1
|
Wyatt KA, Bell J, Cooper J, Constable L, Siero W, Pozo Jeria C, Darling S, Smith R, Hughes EK. Involvement of children and young people in the conduct of health research: A rapid umbrella review. Health Expect 2024; 27:e14081. [PMID: 38845155 PMCID: PMC11156690 DOI: 10.1111/hex.14081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Revised: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) have long been considered important to good research practice. There is growing, yet diverse, evidence in support of PPIE with children and young people (CYP). We must now understand the various approaches to involvement of CYP in research. AIMS This rapid umbrella review aimed to provide an overview of when, how and to what extent CYP are involved in the conduct of health research, as well as the reported benefits, challenges, and facilitators of involvement. METHODS We searched OVID Medline, Embase and PubMed. Published reviews were included if they reported meaningful involvement of CYP in the conduct of health research. Extracted data were synthesised using thematic analysis. RESULTS The 26 reviews included were predominately systematic and scoping reviews, published within the last decade, and originating from North America and the United Kingdom. CYPs were involved in all stages of research across the literature, most commonly during research design and data collection, and rarely during research funding or data sharing and access. Researchers mostly engaged CYP using focus groups, interviews, advisory panels, questionnaires, and to a lesser extent arts-based approaches such as photovoice and drawing. Visual and active creative methods were more commonly used with children ≤12 years. The evidence showed a shared understanding of the benefits, challenges, and facilitators for involvement of CYP, such as time and resource commitment and building partnership. CONCLUSION Overall, the review identified consistency in the range of methods and approaches used, and stages of research with which CYP are commonly involved. There is a need for more consistent reporting of PPIE in the literature, both in terminology and detail used. Furthermore, the impact of approaches to CYP involvement on research and community outcomes must be better evaluated. PATIENT/PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION This review forms part of broader research initiatives being led by the authors. Together, these projects aim to support embedding of child voices in research practice and to explore the desirability and suitability of Young Persons Advisory Groups within birth cohort studies. The findings from this review, alongside public and stakeholder consultation, will inform development of resources such as practice recommendations to guide future involvement of CYP in health research undertaken at the author's respective institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jason Cooper
- Murdoch Children's Research InstituteParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Centre for Community Child HealthRoyal Children's HospitalParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Leanne Constable
- Murdoch Children's Research InstituteParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Centre for Community Child HealthRoyal Children's HospitalParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - William Siero
- Murdoch Children's Research InstituteParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Department of PaediatricsThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Carla Pozo Jeria
- Murdoch Children's Research InstituteParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Centre for Community Child HealthRoyal Children's HospitalParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Simone Darling
- Murdoch Children's Research InstituteParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Centre for Community Child HealthRoyal Children's HospitalParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Department of PaediatricsThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Rachel Smith
- Murdoch Children's Research InstituteParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Centre for Community Child HealthRoyal Children's HospitalParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Department of PaediatricsThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Elizabeth K. Hughes
- Murdoch Children's Research InstituteParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Department of PaediatricsThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- School of Psychological SciencesThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Røssvoll TB, Liabo K, Hanssen TA, Rosenvinge JH, Sundkvist E, Pettersen G. What motivates public collaborators to become and stay involved in health research? RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2024; 10:24. [PMID: 38347609 PMCID: PMC10863223 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-024-00555-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with lived experience of health and illness are increasingly being involved in research. Knowing what creates interest in becoming involved in health research may help identify appropriate ways of facilitating meaningful involvement. The study aimed to investigate why people became public collaborators in health research and what helped sustain their commitment to staying involved. METHODS Semistructured individual qualitative interviews were conducted with 11 Norwegian public collaborators recruited from patient organisations. To enhance the quality and relevance of this study, three public collaborators were involved in framing the study and in the data analysis. One of them is a coauthor of this paper. The interviews were analysed through reflexive thematic analysis, and two themes were generated. RESULTS The first theme, 'research as a vehicle to impact' showed how interest in becoming involved in research was founded on the possibility of impacting healthcare through research. Other inspiring factors were how they appraised the relevance of the research, in addition to the public collaborators' own sense of moral duty to advocate for research related to their own as well as others, illnesses or diseases. The second theme, ''Acknowledgement and accessibility', framed how the participants perceived appreciation of experiential knowledge as crucial for maintaining motivation in their role as public collaborators. Other promoters of sustained involvement presented were training for both public collaborators and researchers, adequate allowance as a means for visualising and valuing PPI, and accessible language. CONCLUSIONS This study contributes to the understanding of how to facilitate meaningful and sustainable PPI, which requires a safe space for collaboration and attention to accessibility. Facilitating meaningful involvement may, in turn, increase the potential impact and sustainability of PPI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toril Beate Røssvoll
- Department of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsø, Norway.
| | - Kristin Liabo
- College of Medicine and Health, PenCLAHRC Patient and Public Involvement Team, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Tove Aminda Hanssen
- Department of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Jan H Rosenvinge
- Department of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Elisabeth Sundkvist
- Centre for Shared Decision Making, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Gunn Pettersen
- Department of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Adus S, Macklin J, Pinto A. Exploring patient perspectives on how they can and should be engaged in the development of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in health care. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1163. [PMID: 37884940 PMCID: PMC10605984 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10098-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Artificial intelligence (AI) is a rapidly evolving field which will have implications on both individual patient care and the health care system. There are many benefits to the integration of AI into health care, such as predicting acute conditions and enhancing diagnostic capabilities. Despite these benefits potential harms include algorithmic bias, inadequate consent processes, and implications on the patient-provider relationship. One tool to address patients' needs and prevent the negative implications of AI is through patient engagement. As it currently stands, patients have infrequently been involved in AI application development for patient care delivery. Furthermore, we are unaware of any frameworks or recommendations specifically addressing patient engagement within the field of AI in health care. METHODS We conducted four virtual focus groups with thirty patient participants to understand of how patients can and should be meaningfully engaged within the field of AI development in health care. Participants completed an educational module on the fundamentals of AI prior to participating in this study. Focus groups were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS We found that participants in our study wanted to be engaged at the problem-identification stages using multiple methods such as surveys and interviews. Participants preferred that recruitment methodologies for patient engagement included both in-person and social media-based approaches with an emphasis on varying language modalities of recruitment to reflect diverse demographics. Patients prioritized the inclusion of underrepresented participant populations, longitudinal relationship building, accessibility, and interdisciplinary involvement of other stakeholders in AI development. We found that AI education is a critical step to enable meaningful patient engagement within this field. We have curated recommendations into a framework for the field to learn from and implement in future development. CONCLUSION Given the novelty and speed at which AI innovation is progressing in health care, patient engagement should be the gold standard for application development. Our proposed recommendations seek to enable patient-centered AI application development in health care. Future research must be conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of patient engagement in AI application development to ensure that both AI application development and patient engagement are done rigorously, efficiently, and meaningfully.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samira Adus
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Jillian Macklin
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew Pinto
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Toronto, ON, Canada
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Teodorowski P, Gleason K, Gregory JJ, Martin M, Punjabi R, Steer S, Savasir S, Vema P, Murray K, Ward H, Chapko D. Participatory evaluation of the process of co-producing resources for the public on data science and artificial intelligence. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2023; 9:67. [PMID: 37580823 PMCID: PMC10426152 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-023-00480-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The growth of data science and artificial intelligence offers novel healthcare applications and research possibilities. Patients should be able to make informed choices about using healthcare. Therefore, they must be provided with lay information about new technology. A team consisting of academic researchers, health professionals, and public contributors collaboratively co-designed and co-developed the new resource offering that information. In this paper, we evaluate this novel approach to co-production. METHODS We used participatory evaluation to understand the co-production process. This consisted of creative approaches and reflexivity over three stages. Firstly, everyone had an opportunity to participate in three online training sessions. The first one focused on the aims of evaluation, the second on photovoice (that included practical training on using photos as metaphors), and the third on being reflective (recognising one's biases and perspectives during analysis). During the second stage, using photovoice, everyone took photos that symbolised their experiences of being involved in the project. This included a session with a professional photographer. At the last stage, we met in person and, using data collected from photovoice, built the mandala as a representation of a joint experience of the project. This stage was supported by professional artists who summarised the mandala in the illustration. RESULTS The mandala is the artistic presentation of the findings from the evaluation. It is a shared journey between everyone involved. We divided it into six related layers. Starting from inside layers present the following experiences (1) public contributors had space to build confidence in a new topic, (2) relationships between individuals and within the project, (3) working remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic, (4) motivation that influenced people to become involved in this particular piece of work, (5) requirements that co-production needs to be inclusive and accessible to everyone, (6) expectations towards data science and artificial intelligence that researchers should follow to establish public support. CONCLUSIONS The participatory evaluation suggests that co-production around data science and artificial intelligence can be a meaningful process that is co-owned by everyone involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kelly Gleason
- Imperial Cancer Research UK Lead Nurse, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Jonathan J Gregory
- Computational Oncology Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Martha Martin
- School of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Kabelo Murray
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Helen Ward
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London, Imperial College London, London, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Dorota Chapko
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Irgens EL, Berglen G, Christoffersen T, Henninen AP, Hermansen R, Karlsen MRE, Kokkvoll AS, Liabo K, Møllersen S, Rugland G, Stock MH, Zachariassen TO, Kjaer M. Our health, our research. Identifying public health research priorities among children and youth in a multiethnic population: protocol for a community-based participatory health research priority survey. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e072567. [PMID: 37474191 PMCID: PMC10357779 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Emphasis on public involvement (PI) in health research has increased in the last 20 years. However, there is limited literature on PI in planning and conducting population-based health research. This study aims to identify child and adolescent health research priorities among children and stakeholder groups in Northern Norway by inviting PI groups to collaborate with researchers to develop and conduct a research priority survey. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a community-based participatory research project. The methods for research prioritisation are informed by those developed by the James Lind Alliance. In addition, the survey design and engagement plans are developed in extensive collaboration with child and youth stakeholder groups. Nine PI groups have met three times to develop an anonymous child and youth health research priority survey, as well as strategies for recruitment and dissemination of results. All 5th-10th grade pupils in the Finnmark region will be invited to participate in the survey, as well as caretakers and adults working for and with children and youth. The survey results will be analysed in collaboration with the PI groups, and research priorities checked with existing research literature. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study is registered and approved by the Data Protection Authorities at the Finnmark Hospital Trust and the Expert Committee for Sami Health Research. Descriptions of methods applied and the survey results will be published in popular and scientific publications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eirik Lind Irgens
- Department of Health Care Quality and Research, Finnmark Hospital Trust, Alta, Norway
- Department of Health and Care Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway Faculty of Health Sciences, Tromsø, Norway
| | | | - Tore Christoffersen
- Department of Health Care Quality and Research, Finnmark Hospital Trust, Alta, Norway
- School of Sports Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway Faculty of Health Sciences, Tromsø, Norway
| | | | - Rune Hermansen
- Department of Health, Care and Social Services, County Governor of Troms and Finnmark, Vadso, Norway
| | | | - Ane Sofie Kokkvoll
- School of Sports Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway Faculty of Health Sciences, Tromsø, Norway
- Department of Paediatrics, Finnmark Hospital Trust, Hammerfest, Norway
| | - Kristin Liabo
- Institute for Health Research, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Snefrid Møllersen
- Finnmark Hospital Sami National Competence Service Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Kirkenes, Norway
| | - Grete Rugland
- Center for Guidance, Norwegian Women's Public Health Association, Oslo, Norway
| | - Magnhild Helen Stock
- Department of Public Health, Troms and Finnmark County Municipality, Vadso, Norway
| | | | - Mette Kjaer
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway Faculty of Health Sciences, Tromsø, Norway
- Finnmark Hospital Trust, Hammerfest, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Minheere A, Lambrechts W, Mampaey J, Stough T, Caniëls MCJ, Semeijn J. Patient Power and Empowerment: Mitigating Elements of Valuable Patient Participation in Healthcare Collaboratives. Behav Sci (Basel) 2023; 13:bs13040347. [PMID: 37102861 PMCID: PMC10136329 DOI: 10.3390/bs13040347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023] Open
Abstract
During the last decade, the public healthcare sector has had to deal with increased competition, a growing influence of patient associations, and a necessity to deliver health services more efficiently and effectively. Despite recognising the patient participant's role as a critical stakeholder in value creation, there is a limited body of research on the influence and power of patient participants. This article focuses on regional health improvement collaboratives that aim to develop coordinated, multi-stakeholder solutions to their healthcare cost and quality problems. They meet regularly and include health professionals, health insurance providers, and patient participants. In this article, we explore the relationships between these stakeholders and patient participants' interpersonal dimensions regarding empowerment and valuable collaboration. Data were collected through stakeholder observations during meetings of three regional health improvement collaboratives, as well as through semi-structured interviews with the patient participants involved in these cases. Results show that patient participants can be empowered on a personal level. However, this does not imply that patient participants are empowered within the group dynamics. Interpersonal relationships constitute a crucial hidden aspect of building trust. More dialogue and inquiry are needed to examine how patient engagement is enacted and positioned within healthcare collaboratives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Minheere
- Faculty of Management, Open Universiteit of the Netherlands, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Wim Lambrechts
- Faculty of Management, Open Universiteit of the Netherlands, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle Mampaey
- Faculty of Management, Open Universiteit of the Netherlands, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Talia Stough
- Faculty of Management, Open Universiteit of the Netherlands, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein C J Caniëls
- Faculty of Management, Open Universiteit of the Netherlands, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Janjaap Semeijn
- Faculty of Management, Open Universiteit of the Netherlands, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Adebisi YA. Decolonizing Epidemiological Research: A Critical Perspective. Avicenna J Med 2023; 13:68-76. [PMID: 37435557 PMCID: PMC10332938 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1769088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Decolonizing epidemiological research is a crucial endeavor. Historically, colonial and imperialistic ideologies have pervaded epidemiology, leading to an emphasis on Western perspectives and the neglect of indigenous and other marginalized communities' needs and experiences. To effectively address health disparities and promote justice and equality, acknowledging and addressing these power imbalances are imperative. In this article, I highlight the need of decolonizing epidemiological research and make recommendations. These include increasing the representation of researchers from underrepresented communities, ensuring that epidemiological research is contextually relevant and responsive to the experiences of these communities, and collaborating with policymakers and advocacy groups to inform policies and practices that benefit all populations. Moreover, I underscore the importance of recognizing and valuing the knowledge and skills of marginalized populations, and integrating traditional knowledge-the distinct, culturally specific understanding unique to a particular group-into research efforts. I also emphasize the need of capacity building and equitable research collaborations and authorship as well as epidemiological journal editorship. Decolonizing epidemiology research is a continual process that requires continuing discourse, collaboration, and education.
Collapse
|
8
|
Evans BA, Carson‐Stevens A, Cooper A, Davies F, Edwards M, Harrington B, Hepburn J, Hughes T, Price D, Siriwardena NA, Snooks H, Edwards A. Implementing public involvement throughout the research process-Experience and learning from the GPs in EDs study. Health Expect 2022; 25:2471-2484. [PMID: 35894169 PMCID: PMC9615054 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Public involvement in health services research is encouraged. Descriptions of public involvement across the whole research cycle of a major study are uncommon and its effects on research conduct are poorly understood. AIM This study aimed to describe how we implemented public involvement, reflect on process and effects in a large-scale multi-site research study and present learning for future involvement practice. METHOD We recorded public involvement roles and activities throughout the study and compared these to our original public involvement plan included in our project proposal. We held a group interview with study co-applicants to explore their experiences, transcribed the recorded discussion and conducted thematic analysis. We synthesized the findings to develop recommendations for future practice. RESULTS Public contributors' activities went beyond strategic study planning and management to include active involvement in data collection, analysis and dissemination. They attended management, scrutiny, planning and task meetings. They also facilitated public involvement through annual planning and review sessions, conducted a Public Involvement audit and coordinated public and patient input to stakeholder discussions at key study stages. Group interview respondents said that involvement exceeded their expectations. They identified effects such as changes to patient recruitment, terminology clarification and extra dissemination activities. They identified factors enabling effective involvement including team and leader commitment, named support contact, building relationships and demonstrating equality and public contributors being confident to challenge and flexible to meet researchers' timescales and work patterns. There were challenges matching resources to roles and questions about the risk of over-professionalizing public contributors. CONCLUSION We extended our planned approach to public involvement and identified benefits to the research process that were both specific and general. We identified good practice to support effective public involvement in health services research that study teams should consider in planning and undertaking research. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION This paper was co-conceived, co-planned and co-authored by public contributors to contribute research evidence, based on their experiences of active involvement in the design, implementation and dissemination of a major health services research study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridie Angela Evans
- Swansea University Medical SchoolSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
- Swansea University Medical School, PRIME Centre WalesSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
| | - Andrew Carson‐Stevens
- Swansea University Medical School, PRIME Centre WalesSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, PRIME Centre WalesCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
| | - Alison Cooper
- Swansea University Medical School, PRIME Centre WalesSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, PRIME Centre WalesCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
| | - Freya Davies
- Swansea University Medical School, PRIME Centre WalesSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, PRIME Centre WalesCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
| | - Michelle Edwards
- Swansea University Medical School, PRIME Centre WalesSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, PRIME Centre WalesCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
| | - Barbara Harrington
- Public Contributor, c/o Swansea University Medical SchoolSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
| | - Julie Hepburn
- Public Contributor, c/o Swansea University Medical SchoolSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
| | | | - Delyth Price
- Swansea University Medical School, PRIME Centre WalesSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, PRIME Centre WalesCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
| | | | - Helen Snooks
- Swansea University Medical SchoolSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
- Swansea University Medical School, PRIME Centre WalesSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
| | - Adrian Edwards
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, PRIME Centre WalesCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Adams AMN, Chamberlain D, Thorup CB, Grønkjær M, Conroy T. Ethical and feasible stakeholder engagement in guideline development. Collegian 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.colegn.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
10
|
Näslund H, Grim K, Markström U. User-Focused Monitoring as a Strategy for Involvement and Mental Health Service Development: An Analysis of Swedish Monitoring Reports. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOCIAL REHABILITATION AND MENTAL HEALTH 2022; 9:303-316. [PMID: 35345414 PMCID: PMC8942048 DOI: 10.1007/s40737-022-00268-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
User-focused monitoring (UFM) is a method of evaluating mental health services, conducted by people with lived experience of mental ill health. Research on UFM and on user involvement focused on service monitoring and evaluation is lacking. This study addresses this knowledge gap by examining UFM as a strategy for user involvement. More specifically, this study aims to synthesize patterns in UFM reports to characterize the phenomenon, as well as to further discuss negotiation processes and political opportunities in UFM. The empirical material consists of 136 Swedish UFM reports that have been analyzed in two steps: All reports were mapped according to general characteristics and a sample of 20 reports were selected to provide additional information on the method. This study has been conducted in collaboration with actors representing the user movement and municipality-based mental health services. Our analysis shows that long-term contracts between user organizations and service providers are important to create a sustainable implementation of UFM. However, strategies to protect user autonomy must be carefully considered and employed in relation to such collaborations. We further highlight the risks of a restricted focus on consumer satisfaction, and discuss the current development towards including follow-ups in the UFM process as a strategy for counteracting tokenism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilda Näslund
- Department of Social Work, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Katarina Grim
- Department of Social and Psychological Studies, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Owen E, Massazza A, Roberts B, Lokot M, Fuhr DC. “Nothing about us, without us”? A qualitative study of service user involvement in the development of lay-delivered psychological interventions in contexts affected by humanitarian crises. J Migr Health 2022; 5:100087. [PMID: 35243462 PMCID: PMC8885574 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmh.2022.100087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background : Service user involvement has become increasingly prioritised within health research, and more recently, within mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS). However, there is limited exploration of service user involvement in the development of lay-delivered MHPSS psychological interventions. The aim of this research was to investigate how service users have been involved in the development of lay-delivered psychological interventions for populations affected by humanitarian crises. Methods : Thirteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with respondents involved in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of lay-delivered MHPSS psychological interventions, either as principal investigators or as focal points for service user involvement. Thematic data analysis used was used to analyse the data. Results : There was a common perception that service user involvement is vital to the development of lay-delivered psychological interventions, but there was concern about how that happened in practice. Respondents desired to increase service user involvement, but they either did not know how to do this into practice or felt that they lacked the resources to do so. Recommendations were made for strengthening involvement, such as employing service users onto research teams. However, legal difficulties in compensating service users for their work were raised. Conclusion : Service user involvement was viewed as vital in the development of lay delivered psychological interventions, but remains predominantly tokenistic, partly due to limited guidance, time, and finances. Guidelines could support more meaningful and ethical service user involvement in lay-delivered psychological interventions in areas affected by humanitarian crises.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Owen
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Pl, London WC1H 9SH, London, UK
| | - Alessandro Massazza
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Pl, London WC1H 9SH, London, UK
| | - Bayard Roberts
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Pl, London WC1H 9SH, London, UK
| | - Michelle Lokot
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Pl, London WC1H 9SH, London, UK
| | - Daniela C. Fuhr
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Pl, London WC1H 9SH, London, UK
- Corresponding author.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Malm C, Andersson S, Kylén M, Iwarsson S, Hanson E, Schmidt SM. What motivates informal carers to be actively involved in research, and what obstacles to involvement do they perceive? RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2021; 7:80. [PMID: 34749834 PMCID: PMC8574014 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-021-00321-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/23/2021] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to demographic changes and a strained public sector operating in many countries globally, informal care is increasing. Currently, at least 1.3 million adults in Sweden regularly provide help, support and/or care to a family member/significant other. With no sign of an imminent decrease in their caring activities, it is important that informal carers are considered as a key stakeholder group within research that affects them, e.g., the co-design of carer and/or dyadic support interventions. The objective of this descriptive, quantitative study was to investigate informal carers' perceived motivations and obstacles to become involved in research. METHODS A cross-sectional survey design was adopted, using first-wave data from a panel study. The data, collected in Sweden between September 2019 and March 2020, included survey responses from 147 informal carers who were either aged 60+ years themselves or were caring for someone who was aged 60+ years. RESULTS Our main results showed that informal carers are, in general, interested in research. Slightly fewer were interested in becoming actively involved themselves, but older age was the only characteristic significantly associated with less interest of being actively involved. Two latent motivational dimensions emerged from the factor analysis: 'family motivation' and 'the greater good motivation'. These, according to our results, almost equally valued dimensions, described the differing reasons for informal carers to become involved in research. The most common perceived obstacle was lack of time and it was reported by more women than men. CONCLUSION Our study contributes with new knowledge of informal carers' perceived motivations and obstacles regarding carer involvement in research. Paying attention to the differing motivational dimensions held by informal carers could help researchers create conditions for more inclusive and systematic participation of informal carers within research. Thereby, increasing the opportunities for research that is deemed to be of higher societal impact. IRRID (International Registered Report Identifier): RR2-10.2196/17759.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Malm
- Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, 391 82, Kalmar, Sweden.
- Swedish Family Care Competence Centre (SFCCC), Box 681, 391 82, Kalmar, Sweden.
| | - Stefan Andersson
- Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, 391 82, Kalmar, Sweden
| | - Maya Kylén
- Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, P.O. Box 157, 221 00, Lund, Sweden
| | - Susanne Iwarsson
- Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, P.O. Box 157, 221 00, Lund, Sweden
| | - Elizabeth Hanson
- Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, 391 82, Kalmar, Sweden
- Swedish Family Care Competence Centre (SFCCC), Box 681, 391 82, Kalmar, Sweden
| | - Steven M Schmidt
- Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, P.O. Box 157, 221 00, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pozniak K, Buchanan F, Cross A, Crowson J, Galuppi B, Grahovac D, Gorter JW, Hlyva O, Ketelaar M, Kraus de Camargo O, Krpan Mesic M, Martens R, McCauley D, Nguyen L, Palisano RJ, Phoenix M, Putterman C, Rosenbaum P, Sprung J, Strohm S, Teplicky R, Thomson D, Wright M. Building a culture of engagement at a research centre for childhood disability. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2021; 7:78. [PMID: 34742354 PMCID: PMC8572501 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-021-00319-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Engaging patients and family members as partners in research studies has become a widespread practice in healthcare. However, relatively little has been documented about what happens after the research study ends. For example, is patient and family engagement embedded in the wider infrastructure of organizations, and if so how? What are the long-term effects of engaging parents on research teams on the culture of how research is conducted? This study seeks to address these two gaps by examining how a culture of family engagement has been built over time at CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada. METHODS This study is based on ethnographic research methodology and combines elements of organizational ethnography, interviews, and collaborative auto-ethnography with parent partners, researchers, staff, and trainees. RESULTS Since the inception of CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research at McMaster University in 1989, parents have been involved in research studies. Over time, this involvement evolved from being consulted on research studies to undertaking decision-making roles as partners and most recently as co-principal investigators. A growing infrastructure fosters a community of engagement that goes beyond the individual research study, and often beyond CanChild. This infrastructure consists of training, knowledge mobilization and social networking. In addition, the "softer" building blocks of CanChild's culture of engagement are an openness to learning from others, a commitment to relationship building, and a drive to grow and improve. These values are espoused by the leadership and are instilled in the next generation of researchers to inform both research and clinical work. While some challenges should be acknowledged when researchers and family partners work together on research studies, we identify a number of strategies that we have used in our studies to foster authentic and meaningful family-researcher partnerships. CONCLUSION Engaging patients and families as partners in research constitutes a culture shift in health research, whereby studies about patients and families are carried out with them. Developing a community of engagement that transcends an individual research study is a step towards creating a culture of research that is truly shaped by the people about whom the research is being done.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kinga Pozniak
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Francine Buchanan
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Andrea Cross
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Jennifer Crowson
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Down Syndrome Association of Hamilton, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Barb Galuppi
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Danijela Grahovac
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Jan Willem Gorter
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Oksana Hlyva
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Marjolijn Ketelaar
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Olaf Kraus de Camargo
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Manda Krpan Mesic
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Rachel Martens
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Dayle McCauley
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Linda Nguyen
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Robert J. Palisano
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA USA
| | - Michelle Phoenix
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Connie Putterman
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Peter Rosenbaum
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Jennifer Sprung
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Sonya Strohm
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Rachel Teplicky
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Donna Thomson
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Marilyn Wright
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yu R, Hanley B, Denegri S, Ahmed J, McNally NJ. Evaluation of a patient and public involvement training programme for researchers at a large biomedical research centre in the UK. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e047995. [PMID: 34385250 PMCID: PMC8362711 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To design, deliver and evaluate a programme of training workshops for biomedical researchers aimed at building confidence and skills in actively involving patients and the public (PPI) in research. DESIGN A bespoke programme of training workshops in PPI aimed at researchers. SETTING A large National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre in London and several partner organisations. PARTICIPANTS 721 scientists, clinicians and research managers attending dedicated training in PPI at a major London NHS (National Health Service)-university partnership. INTERVENTIONS A programme of 72 training workshops, designed to build practical skills and confidence for researchers working with patients and the public in research, was delivered at a major research-active NHS:university partnership. An iterative approach was taken to the programme, with the content of the workshops continually reviewed and refreshed to respond to the needs of researchers. Surveys before, immediately following and 6 months after training investigated the impact on researchers' confidence and skills in PPI work, and the kind of PPI they subsequently carried out. RESULTS Training brought about immediate marked increases in researchers' self-reported confidence to carry out PPI activities within their research, and in their knowledge of good practice. The evaluation indicates that workshop attendees were more likely to involve patients in their research following training. Researchers tended to involve patients and the public in a range of areas, including input to study design and patient information, in particular. CONCLUSIONS When positioned within a broader organisational strategy for PPI in research, such training has an important role to play in progressing PPI in a major research partnership. Training appeared to provide the confidence needed to carry out PPI which enabled further development of confidence and skills. Involving researchers who have attended the training in the ongoing development of the programme and bringing in patients to the training programme are key next steps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosamund Yu
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at UCLH, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Bec Hanley
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Jaber Ahmed
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at UCLH, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Nicholas J McNally
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at UCLH, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Koren Solvang P, Sveen U, Søberg HL. User involvement in the making: Positions and types of knowledge enacted in the interaction between service users and researchers in user panel meetings. Health Expect 2021; 24:1424-1432. [PMID: 34048617 PMCID: PMC8369089 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Numerous studies of user involvement in research have been conducted. However, there is a lack of studies applying observational methods and addressing the concrete practice of involvement. OBJECTIVE To determine what knowledge types and competences users apply when involved in the research process through user panel meetings. DESIGN User panel meetings in a qualitative project in rehabilitation were sound-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data analysis applied an abductive approach framed by positioning theory. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Six rehabilitation service users and a similar number of researchers met 20 times during a six-year project period. They discussed various issues in the research process such as interview guides, analysis and dissemination of results. FINDINGS The service users combined their respective knowledge and competence into six positions enacted in the panel interactions. They engaged as co-researchers, based their contributions on their respective personal histories, represented an NGO and peers, applied their respective professional and educational backgrounds and, finally, engaged as concerned citizens. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION The findings add to the discussion of professionalization of user involvement by introducing a wider array of positions enacted than do the findings of previous studies. Researchers recruiting user panel members, as well as NGOs appointing candidates for user panels, are advised to consider a wide competence profile for possible candidates. A panel is also considered as a resource in confirming and elaborating on a study's findings. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION A service user panel contributed to the study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Unni Sveen
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Prosthetics and OrthoticsOslo Metropolitan UniversityOsloNorway
- Department of Physical Medicine & RehabilitationOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
| | - Helene Lundgaard Søberg
- Department of PhysiotherapyOslo Metropolitan UniversityOsloNorway
- Department of Physical Medicine & RehabilitationOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ekezie W, Routen A, Denegri S, Khunti K. Patient and public involvement for ethnic minority research: an urgent need for improvement. J R Soc Med 2021; 114:347-350. [PMID: 33625873 PMCID: PMC8415812 DOI: 10.1177/0141076821994274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- W Ekezie
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, UK
| | - A Routen
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, UK
| | - S Denegri
- Academy of Medical Sciences, London, UK
| | - K Khunti
- Diabetes Research Centre and The Centre for Black Minority Health, University of Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Solvang PK, Heiaas I, Romsland G, Søberg HL. The unexpected other: Challenges and strategies after acquired impairment. Health (London) 2021; 27:345-361. [PMID: 34075795 DOI: 10.1177/13634593211021482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
People experiencing traumatic brain injury or multitrauma will often live with problems in functioning for a profound period in life. A situation of great complexity emerges involving both the experience of an impaired body and the experience of a changed social position. This article addresses the intricate relations between the altered body, personal ambitions, and social surroundings in the first 2-3 years after an injury. The conceptual framework centers around the process of change, applying concepts such as the unexpected other and biographical reconstruction. Twenty-one people of working age were interviewed two times. All interviewees had experienced traumatic brain injury or multitrauma. A thematic narrative analysis was applied. Consequences of the injury took place at a carnal level where fatigue is something completely different from becoming exhausted and where elimination of body waste takes place through practices novel to the injured person. Living with impairment also took place at the level of social interaction. Here, family relations, shame, and establishing a new identity seemed profoundly important. This article makes two novel contributions. First, it emphasizes more than previous studies do that the daily management of altered body functions is more important for independence and wellbeing. Second, the article identifies the narrative about the accident as an important issue for injured people to settle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ida Heiaas
- Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway.,Norwegian Women's Public Health Association, Norway
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lund A, Holthe T, Halvorsrud L, Karterud D, Johannessen AF, Lovett HM, Thorstensen E, Casagrande FD, Zouganeli E, Norvoll R, Forsberg EM. Involving older adults in technology research and development discussions through dialogue cafés. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2021; 7:26. [PMID: 33971975 PMCID: PMC8111951 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-021-00274-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Citizen involvement is important for ensuring the relevance and quality of many research and innovation efforts. Literature shows that inadequate citizen involvement poses an obstacle during the research, development, and implementation of assistive technology. Previous studies have addressed the advantages and disadvantages of citizen engagement in health research and technology development, and there is concern about how to ensure valuable engagement to avoid situations where they don't have influence. Frail older adults are often excluded from being active partners in research projects. The overall objective of this commentary is to describe a case where dialogue cafés was used as a method for involving assisted living residents in technology discussions, elaborating on the following research question: In what ways are dialogue cafés useful for directing research and development and for engaging residents in assisted living facilities in assistive technology discussions? METHOD Six dialogue cafés with assisted living residents as participants were carried out over a period of 3 years (2016-19). Reports that were written after each café by the group leaders and rapporteurs provide the material for the analyses in this paper. RESULTS This study demonstrates an example of facilitating user involvement where the participants felt useful by contributing to research and discussions on assistive technology and where this contribution in fact directed the research and development in the overall Assisted Living Project. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that dialogue cafés enable older residents at an assisted living facility to contribute with opinions about their needs and perspectives on assistive technologies. This negates the view of older adults as too frail to participate and demonstrates the importance of including and collaborating with older adults in research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Lund
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Occupational Therapy, Prosthetics and Orthotics, Oslo Metropolitan University, PO Box 4, St. Olavs Plass, 0130 Oslo, Norway
| | - Torhild Holthe
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Occupational Therapy, Prosthetics and Orthotics, Oslo Metropolitan University, PO Box 4, St. Olavs Plass, 0130 Oslo, Norway
| | - Liv Halvorsrud
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, PO Box 4, St. Olavs Plass, 0130 Oslo, Norway
| | - Dag Karterud
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, PO Box 4, St. Olavs Plass, 0130 Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | - Erik Thorstensen
- Oslo Metropolitan University, Work Research Institute, PO Box 4, St. Olavs Plass, 0130 Oslo, Norway
| | - Flávia Dias Casagrande
- Faculty of Technology, Art, and Design, Department of Mechanical, Electronics, and Chemical Engineering, Oslo Metropolitan University, PO Box 4, St. Olavs Plass, 0130 Oslo, Norway
| | - Evi Zouganeli
- Faculty of Technology, Art, and Design, Department of Mechanical, Electronics, and Chemical Engineering, Oslo Metropolitan University, PO Box 4, St. Olavs Plass, 0130 Oslo, Norway
| | - Reidun Norvoll
- Oslo Metropolitan University, Work Research Institute, PO Box 4, St. Olavs Plass, 0130 Oslo, Norway
| | - Ellen Marie Forsberg
- Oslo Metropolitan University, Work Research Institute, PO Box 4, St. Olavs Plass, 0130 Oslo, Norway
- NORSUS Norwegian Institute for Sustainability Research, Stadion 4, 1671 Kråkerøy, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Broomfield K, Craig C, Smith S, Jones G, Judge S, Sage K. Creativity in public involvement: supporting authentic collaboration and inclusive research with seldom heard voices. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2021; 7:17. [PMID: 33731228 PMCID: PMC7968302 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-021-00260-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of public involvement (PI) in healthcare research is growing in importance and it is imperative that researchers continuously reflect on how to promote the inclusion of patients and service users in the design and delivery of research. PI offers a mechanism for end-users to be involved planning, executing, and reporting research. Some patient groups, including people who have communication difficulties, may struggle to engage in the methods traditionally employed to promote PI engagement such as questionnaires and focus groups. METHODS This article describes a longitudinal case-study of a PI group, consisting of people who have communication difficulties, for a patient-reported outcome development project. Creative methods, informed by the participatory design principles of enacting, seeing and doing, were introduced stepwise into seven PI meetings. Data from video and visual minutes were used to evaluate the impact of the methods, following each group. Feedback, in the form of verbal and visual outputs taken directly from group meeting minutes, along with vignettes evidenced the impact of the methods on the project and group members. RESULTS Creative methods enabled the PI group members to successfully contribute in meetings, to interact dynamically and to engage with the aims and processes of the research project. Their involvement facilitated the development of accessible recruitment materials, informed data analysis and supported the dissemination of project outputs. Employing creative methods also enabled both PI group members and the academic team to reflect on their own roles within the research project and the impact that their active involvement in the PI group has had on their personal development and perspectives on research. CONCLUSION The impact of using creative methods in PI for this patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) development project improved collaboration and understanding between PI members and the academic team. The authentic engagement of people who have communication difficulties in PI generated a more accessible project in terms of both process and impact. Creativity has applicability beyond people whose communication is non-verbal; it should be harnessed by research teams to identify and breakdown barriers to involvement to develop outcome tools that reflect the diversity of our populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Broomfield
- Gloucestershire Health and Care NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucestershire, UK.
- Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
- Bristol Speech and Language Therapy Research Unit, Steps and Pines, Southmead Hospital, Westbury on Trym, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
| | | | | | | | - Simon Judge
- Barnsley Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Barnsley, UK
- University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Karen Sage
- Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gheduzzi E, Masella C, Morelli N, Graffigna G. How to prevent and avoid barriers in co-production with family carers living in rural and remote area: an Italian case study. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2021; 7:16. [PMID: 33731217 PMCID: PMC7968224 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-021-00259-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Co-production has been widely recognised as a potential means to reduce the dissatisfaction of citizens, the inefficacy of service providers, and conflicts in relations between the former and the latter. However, the benefits of co-production has begun to be questioned: co-production has often been taken for granted, and its effects may not be effective. To understand and prevent unsuccessful citizen and provider collaboration, the recent literature has begun to focus on the causes of co-destruction. This paper investigates how the barriers that may arise during the co-production of a new social service with family carers can be identified and interpreted. METHODS To investigate this topic, we undertook a single case study - a longitudinal project (Place4Carers (Graffigna et al., BMJ Open 10:e037570, 2020)) intended to co-produce a new social care service with and for the family carers of elderly patients living in rural and remote areas. We organised collaborative co-assessment workshops and semi-structured interviews to collect the views of family carers and service providers on the co-production process. A reflexive approach was used in the analysis for collecting the opinions of the research team that participated in the co-production process. RESULTS The analysis revealed four main co-production barriers: lack of trust, lack of effectiveness of engagement, participants' inability (or impossibility) to change and the lack of a cohesive partnership among partners. Despite these findings, the project increases carers' satisfaction, competence and trust in service providers by demonstrating the positive effects of co-production. CONCLUSIONS Our article confirms that co-creation and co-destruction processes may coexist. The role of researchers and service providers is to prevent or remedy co-destruction effects. To this end, we suggest that in co-production projects, more time should be spent co-assessing the project before, during and after the co-production process. This approach would facilitate the adoption of adjustment actions such as creating mutual trust through conviviality among participants and fostering collaborative research between academia and organisations that are not used to working together.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Niccolò Morelli
- School of Management, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Psychology, EngageMinds Hub Consumer, Food & Health Engagement Research Center, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (Milano), Milan, Italy
| | - Guendalina Graffigna
- Department of Psychology, EngageMinds Hub Consumer, Food & Health Engagement Research Center, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (Milano), Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Stuhlfauth S, Knutsen IR, Foss IC. Guidelines as governance: Critical reflections from a documentary analysis of guidelines to support user involvement in research. Nurs Inq 2020; 28:e12378. [PMID: 32905645 DOI: 10.1111/nin.12378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Revised: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Although guidelines to regulate user involvement in research have been advocated and implemented for several years, literature still describes the process as challenging. In this qualitative study, we take a critical view on guidelines that are developed to regulate and govern the collaboration process of user involvement in research. We adapt a social constructivist view of guidelines and our aim is to explore how guidelines construct the perception of users and researchers and thus the process of involvement. Twenty-two guidelines published between 2006 and 2019 were analyzed iteratively. The analysis focuses on values which are emphasized in the guidelines on the distribution of entities, knowledge, and tasks between users and researchers. The analysis indicates that users and researchers are constructed differently; researchers are mainly constructed as responsible initiators and caretakers, while users are constructed as powerless and vulnerable. The guidelines portray the collaboration process as harmonious and assume a normative perspective. In doing so, challenges described in the literature related to power imbalances are not addressed. Based on these findings, we ask if these guidelines might function to maintain existing power imbalances between users and researchers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Stuhlfauth
- Department of Nursing Science, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ingrid Ruud Knutsen
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, Kjeller, Norway
| | - Ingrid Christina Foss
- Department of Nursing Science, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Smits DW, van Meeteren K, Klem M, Alsem M, Ketelaar M. Designing a tool to support patient and public involvement in research projects: the Involvement Matrix. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2020; 6:30. [PMID: 32550002 PMCID: PMC7296703 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-020-00188-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2019] [Accepted: 03/26/2020] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interest in patient involvement in research is growing. Research should rather be 'with' or 'by' patients, and not only be 'about' or 'for' patients. Patients' active involvement in research is not self-evident and special efforts have to be made. If we make efforts towards patient involvement, it could contribute to even more relevant projects with an even greater impact. In this paper we describe the process of development of a tool to support patient involvement in research projects. METHODS The tool development was done in a co-creation of experience experts (patients and their parents/relatives) together with researchers. We used a participatory method in an iterative process comprising three consecutive stages. First, the purpose for the tool was explored, using focus groups. Second, the main ingredients and conceptualization for the tool were determined, using a narrative review. Third, the so-called Involvement Matrix was formalized and finalized using various expert panels. RESULTS A conversation tool was developed, through which researchers and patients could discuss and explain their roles of involvement in a research project. This tool was formalized and visualized as a 'matrix'. The so-called Involvement Matrix describes five roles (i.e., Listener, Co-thinker, Advisor, Partner, and Decision-maker) and three phases (i.e., Preparation, Execution, and Implementation) and includes a user's guide. CONCLUSION The Involvement Matrix can be used prospectively to discuss about possible roles of patients in different phases of projects, and retrospectively to discuss whether roles were carried out satisfactorily. Sharing experiences with the Involvement Matrix and evaluating its impact are the next steps in supporting patient involvement in research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk-Wouter Smits
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- ‘Denker in Beweging’, Organization for Action Research Involving Parents and Children, Terheijden, the Netherlands
| | - Karen van Meeteren
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- ‘OuderInzicht’, Parent Organization for Increasement of Parent Involvement in Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn Klem
- BOSK, Association of People with congenital disabilities, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Mattijs Alsem
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolijn Ketelaar
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Evans J, Papoulias S(C. Between funder requirements and 'jobbing scientists': the evolution of patient and public involvement in a mental health biomedical research centre - a qualitative study. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2020; 6:12. [PMID: 32322407 PMCID: PMC7164170 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-020-00185-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2019] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the UK, there has been a strong drive towards patient and public involvement (PPI) in health research. Its benefits include improvements in the quality, relevance and acceptability of research, and empowerment, self-respect and value for service users. Organisational context can significantly influence the operationalisation of PPI. Research has highlighted power asymmetries between clinicians, researchers and service users. A resistance to power sharing, tokenism and assimilation into the existing culture suggest that a consultative, technocratic form of PPI is operating within health research settings. The aim of the study was to explore the development of PPI within a London based mental health biomedical research centre (BRC) over a period of 10 years from its inception. METHODS This qualitative study compared data from 52 organisational documents and 16 semi-structured interviews with staff and service users associated with PPI within the Maudsley BRC. The data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Study design, data collection, analysis and write up were conducted by service user researchers. RESULTS Our analysis showed a picture of increasing activity and acceptance of PPI, its alignment with the broader BRC research agenda, progressive involvement of service users in governance, and the development of a collaborative culture in research processes. The presence of salaried service user researchers in the organisation was key to this progress. However, PPI remained localised and under resourced and there was a reluctance to change working practices which resulted in perceptions of tokenism. Service users faced conflicting expectations and were expected to assimilate rather than challenge the organisation's 'biomedical agenda'. CONCLUSIONS Service user researchers may play a key role in establishing PPI in a scientific, hierarchical research environment. Adoption of a more democratic approach to involvement would build on the good work already being done and help to transform the culture and research processes. However, such an adoption requires considerable changes to the funding and policy environment orienting health research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Evans
- Department of Psychology, King’s College London, London, SE5 8AF UK
| | | |
Collapse
|