1
|
Uslu Y, Er S, Subaşı Sezgin D, Yeşilyurt A, Uras C. What Do Breast Cancer Previvors Tell Us About Their Stories? To Know or Not to Know? Semin Oncol Nurs 2024; 40:151714. [PMID: 39164159 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/22/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to explore the (1) experiences of breast cancer previvor women during genetic testing; (2) perceptions of the impact of genetic testing on their personal, social, family, and professional lives; and (3) views on breast cancer prevention and follow-up processes. This study focused on the risk of breast cancer in persons with BRCA mutations. METHODS Data were collected through individual in-depth semistructured interviews. The data were analyzed using the MAXQDA program based on the method suggested by Graneheim and Lundman. RESULTS This study was conducted in Istanbul, Turkey, and included 17 participants. Five themes emerged from the data analysis-Acquaintance with BRCA, Living with BRCA, Managing the Legacy, Maternalism, and We Are Here, including a total of 12 categories. CONCLUSION The previvors had negative experiences during genetic testing, mainly owing to a lack of information, stigma, and women's roles in society. A structured and individualized process for genetic counseling was identified as the main requirement. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE National and international policies on breast cancer previvors should be developed to prevent breast cancer and reduce mortality. Adopting a multidisciplinary approach during genetic counseling will favorably contribute to previvors' medical and psychosocial well-being. Follow-up programs before and after genetic testing should be created. Society's cultural and genetic literacy levels should be evaluated, and activities should be planned to raise social awareness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasemin Uslu
- Department of Surgical Nursing, Istanbul University, Faculty of Nursing, Fatih, İstanbul.
| | - Seda Er
- Department of Mental Health and Psychiatric Nursing, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, İstanbul
| | | | | | - Cihan Uras
- Acibadem University, Institute of Senology, İstanbul
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
An J, McDougall J, Lin Y, Lu SE, Walters ST, Heidt E, Stroup A, Paddock L, Grumet S, Toppmeyer D, Kinney AY. Randomized trial promoting cancer genetic risk assessment when genetic counseling cost removed: 1-year follow-up. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2024; 8:pkae018. [PMID: 38490263 PMCID: PMC11006111 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkae018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer genetic risk assessment (CGRA) is recommended for women with ovarian and high-risk breast cancer. However, the underutilization of CGRA has long been documented, and cost has been a major barrier. In this randomized controlled trial, a tailored counseling and navigation (TCN) intervention significantly improved CGRA uptake at 6-month follow-up, compared with targeted print (TP) and usual care (UC). We aimed to examine the effect of removing genetic counseling costs on CGRA uptake by 12 months. METHODS We recruited racially and geographically diverse women with breast and ovarian cancer from cancer registries in Colorado, New Jersey, and New Mexico. Participants assigned to TCN received telephone-based psychoeducation and navigation. After 6 months, the trial provided free genetic counseling to participants in all arms. RESULTS At 12 months, more women in TCN obtained CGRA (26.6%) than those in TP (11.0%; odds ratio [OR] = 2.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.56 to 4.89) and UC (12.2%; OR = 2.46, 95% CI = 1.41 to 4.29). There were no significant differences in CGRA uptake between TP and UC. The Kaplan-Meier curve shows that the divergence of cumulative incidence slopes (TCN vs UC, TCN vs TP) appears primarily within the initial 6 months. CONCLUSION TCN significantly increased CGRA uptake at the 12-month follow-up. Directly removing the costs of genetic counseling attenuated the effects of TCN, highlighting the critical enabling role played by cost coverage. Future policies and interventions should address multilevel cost-related barriers to expand patients' access to CGRA. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial was registered with the NIH clinical trial registry, clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03326713. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03326713.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinghua An
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | | | - Yong Lin
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- Rutgers University School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Shou-En Lu
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- Rutgers University School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Scott T Walters
- University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA
| | - Emily Heidt
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Antoinette Stroup
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- Rutgers University School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Lisa Paddock
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- Rutgers University School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Sherry Grumet
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | | | - Anita Y Kinney
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- Rutgers University School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Martinez JM, Zinberg RE, Diaz GA, Naik H. Patient and Provider Experiences and Views on the Use of Telehealth in Genetics Clinics in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Telemed J E Health 2024; 30:118-125. [PMID: 37294555 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic necessitated a mass transition in genetics clinics nationwide from in-person care to virtual care through telehealth. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, there was limited research on the use of telehealth in genetics specialties. Therefore, the COVID-19 pandemic presented a unique opportunity to study this emerging mode of care delivery in the setting of genetics clinics. This study described the scope of telehealth use in genetics clinics nationally and determined how COVID-19 influenced patients' decisions regarding their genetic care. Methods: Two anonymous surveys for patients and providers were developed. The patient survey was offered online to all genetics patients seen through telehealth at a Manhattan-based practice between March and December 2020. The provider survey was distributed through several listservs to genetics providers nationwide. Results: Patients (n = 242) and providers (n = 150) responded. Telehealth was used in all specialty genetics clinics for both initial and follow-up visits. Telehealth was both effective and satisfactory to patients for both visit types and across specialties; however, Asian and Hispanic/Latino patients had significantly lower mean satisfaction scores compared with White patients (p = 0.03 and 0.04, respectively). Patients appreciated telehealth for its convenience and to avoid COVID-19 exposure. Providers across specialties and provider types preferred telehealth for follow-up rather than initial visits. Several clinic initiatives related to telehealth were identified. Discussion: Telehealth was generally well received by both patients and providers, and is expected to become permanent option in genetics clinics. Further studies are needed to identify barriers to accessing telehealth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia M Martinez
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
- Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Randi E Zinberg
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - George A Diaz
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Hetanshi Naik
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Agiannitopoulos K, Potska K, Katseli A, Ntogka C, Tsaousis GN, Pepe G, Bouzarelou D, Tsoulos N, Papathanasiou A, Ziogas D, Venizelos V, Markopoulos C, Iosifidou R, Karageorgopoulou S, Giassas S, Natsiopoulos I, Papazisis K, Vasilaki-Antonatou M, Psyrri A, Koumarianou A, Matthaios D, Zairi E, Blidaru A, Banu E, Jinga DC, Laçin Ş, Özdoğan M, Papadopoulou E, Nasioulas G. Only 32.3% of Breast Cancer Families with Pathogenic Variants in Cancer Genes Utilized Cascade Genetic Testing. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5218. [PMID: 37958392 PMCID: PMC10649031 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15215218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes are responsible for approximately 5-10% of all diagnosed cancer cases. In order to identify individuals at risk in a cost-efficient manner, family members of individuals carrying pathogenic alterations are tested only for the specific variant that was identified in their carrier relative. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical use and implementation of cascade family testing (CFT) in families of breast cancer patients with pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PVs/LPVs) in cancer-related predisposition genes. METHODS Germline sequencing was carried out with NGS technology using a 52-gene panel, and cascade testing was performed by Sanger sequencing or MLPA. RESULTS In a cohort of 1785 breast cancer patients (families), 20.3% were found to have PVs/LPVs. Specifically, 52.2%, 25.1%, and 22.7% of patients had positive findings in high-, intermediate-, and low-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility genes, respectively. Although CFT was recommended to all families, only 117 families (32.3%) agreed to proceed with genetic testing. Among the first-degree relatives who underwent CFT, 70.3% were female, and 108 of 121 (89.3%) were cancer free. Additionally, 42.7%, 36.7%, and 20.6% were offspring, siblings, and parents of the subject, respectively. Our data suggest that CFT was mostly undertaken (104/117, 88.8%) in families with positive findings in high-risk genes. CONCLUSIONS Cascade family testing can be a powerful tool for primary cancer prevention by identifying at-risk family members. It is of utmost importance to implement genetic counseling approaches leading to increased awareness and communication of genetic testing results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos Agiannitopoulos
- Genekor Medical S.A., 15344 Athens, Greece; (K.P.); (A.K.); (C.N.); (G.N.T.); (G.P.); (D.B.); (N.T.); (A.P.); (E.P.); (G.N.)
| | - Kevisa Potska
- Genekor Medical S.A., 15344 Athens, Greece; (K.P.); (A.K.); (C.N.); (G.N.T.); (G.P.); (D.B.); (N.T.); (A.P.); (E.P.); (G.N.)
| | - Anastasia Katseli
- Genekor Medical S.A., 15344 Athens, Greece; (K.P.); (A.K.); (C.N.); (G.N.T.); (G.P.); (D.B.); (N.T.); (A.P.); (E.P.); (G.N.)
| | - Christina Ntogka
- Genekor Medical S.A., 15344 Athens, Greece; (K.P.); (A.K.); (C.N.); (G.N.T.); (G.P.); (D.B.); (N.T.); (A.P.); (E.P.); (G.N.)
| | - Georgios N. Tsaousis
- Genekor Medical S.A., 15344 Athens, Greece; (K.P.); (A.K.); (C.N.); (G.N.T.); (G.P.); (D.B.); (N.T.); (A.P.); (E.P.); (G.N.)
| | - Georgia Pepe
- Genekor Medical S.A., 15344 Athens, Greece; (K.P.); (A.K.); (C.N.); (G.N.T.); (G.P.); (D.B.); (N.T.); (A.P.); (E.P.); (G.N.)
| | - Dimitra Bouzarelou
- Genekor Medical S.A., 15344 Athens, Greece; (K.P.); (A.K.); (C.N.); (G.N.T.); (G.P.); (D.B.); (N.T.); (A.P.); (E.P.); (G.N.)
| | - Nikolaos Tsoulos
- Genekor Medical S.A., 15344 Athens, Greece; (K.P.); (A.K.); (C.N.); (G.N.T.); (G.P.); (D.B.); (N.T.); (A.P.); (E.P.); (G.N.)
| | - Athanasios Papathanasiou
- Genekor Medical S.A., 15344 Athens, Greece; (K.P.); (A.K.); (C.N.); (G.N.T.); (G.P.); (D.B.); (N.T.); (A.P.); (E.P.); (G.N.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Stylianos Giassas
- IASO, General Maternity and Gynecology Clinic, 15123 Athens, Greece; (S.K.); (S.G.)
| | | | | | | | - Amanta Psyrri
- Section of Medical Oncology, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (A.P.); (A.K.)
| | - Anna Koumarianou
- Section of Medical Oncology, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (A.P.); (A.K.)
| | | | - Eleni Zairi
- St. Luke’s Hospital, 55236 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Alexandru Blidaru
- Alexandru Trestioreanu Bucharest Oncology Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Eugeniu Banu
- Saint Constantin Hospital, 500299 Brasov, Romania;
| | | | - Şahin Laçin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Koc University Faculty of Medicine, 34010 Istanbul, Turkey;
| | - Mustafa Özdoğan
- Division of Medical Oncology, Memorial Antalya Hospital, 07025 Antalya, Turkey;
| | - Eirini Papadopoulou
- Genekor Medical S.A., 15344 Athens, Greece; (K.P.); (A.K.); (C.N.); (G.N.T.); (G.P.); (D.B.); (N.T.); (A.P.); (E.P.); (G.N.)
| | - George Nasioulas
- Genekor Medical S.A., 15344 Athens, Greece; (K.P.); (A.K.); (C.N.); (G.N.T.); (G.P.); (D.B.); (N.T.); (A.P.); (E.P.); (G.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shaffer KM, Turner KL, Siwik C, Gonzalez BD, Upasani R, Glazer JV, Ferguson RJ, Joshua C, Low CA. Digital health and telehealth in cancer care: a scoping review of reviews. Lancet Digit Health 2023; 5:e316-e327. [PMID: 37100545 PMCID: PMC10124999 DOI: 10.1016/s2589-7500(23)00049-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated remote cancer care delivery via the internet and telephone, rapidly accelerating an already growing care delivery model and associated research. This scoping review of reviews characterised the peer-reviewed literature reviews on digital health and telehealth interventions in cancer published from database inception up to May 1, 2022, from PubMed, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Cochrane Reviews, and Web of Science. Eligible reviews conducted a systematic literature search. Data were extracted in duplicate via a pre-defined online survey. Following screening, 134 reviews met the eligibility criteria. 77 of those reviews were published since 2020. 128 reviews summarised interventions intended for patients, 18 addressed family caregivers, and five addressed health-care providers. 56 reviews did not target a specific phase of the cancer continuum, whereas 48 reviews tended to address the active treatment phase. 29 reviews included a meta-analysis, with results showing positive effects on quality of life, psychological outcomes, and screening behaviours. 83 reviews did not report intervention implementation outcomes but when reported, 36 reported acceptability, 32 feasibility, and 29 fidelity outcomes. Several notable gaps were identified in these literature reviews on digital health and telehealth in cancer care. No reviews specifically addressed older adults, bereavement, or sustainability of interventions and only two reviews focused on comparing telehealth to in-person interventions. Addressing these gaps with rigorous systematic reviews might help guide continued innovation in remote cancer care, particularly for older adults and bereaved families, and integrate and sustain these interventions within oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly M Shaffer
- Center for Behavioral Health and Technology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
| | - Kea L Turner
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Chelsea Siwik
- Osher Center for Integrative Health, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Brian D Gonzalez
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Rujula Upasani
- Center for Behavioral Health and Technology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Jillian V Glazer
- Center for Behavioral Health and Technology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Robert J Ferguson
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Catherine Joshua
- Center for Behavioral Health and Technology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Carissa A Low
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Christian S, Tagoe J, Delday L, Bernier FP, Kohut R, Ferrier R. IMPACT webinars: Improving Patient Access to genetic Counselling and Testing using webinars-the Alberta experience with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Community Genet 2022; 13:81-89. [PMID: 34766249 PMCID: PMC8582342 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-021-00564-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Growing demand for genetic counselling and testing has created a need for innovative service delivery models to provide quality care in an efficient manner. The goal of this study was to develop and evaluate a patient-facing webinar providing pre-test genetic counselling to individuals with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. A patient-facing webinar was developed and implemented between April 2019 and January 2021. It was evaluated using the Alberta Quality Matrix for Health framework, which considers the patient experience across the domains of effectiveness, appropriateness, acceptability, accessibility, and efficiency. The webinar group showed comparable scores to controls with regard to self-perceived knowledge and decisional conflict. The majority of patients reported that the webinar met their expectations and was an acceptable replacement for a 1:1 genetic counselling appointment. Finally, the webinar reduced genetic counsellor time to an average of 24 min per patient. Providing pre-test genetic counselling to index hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients via a group webinar has achieved a high quality of care, and optimized use of provider and space resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Christian
- Medical Genetics Clinic, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
| | - Julia Tagoe
- Lethbridge Outreach Genetics Service, Alberta Health Services, Lethbridge, AB, Canada
| | - Lenore Delday
- Unified Communications Services, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Francois P Bernier
- Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, Alberta Health Services South, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Ruth Kohut
- Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, Alberta Health Services South, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Raechel Ferrier
- Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, Alberta Health Services South, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Experiences of BRCA1/2 Gene Mutation-Positive Women With Cancer in Communicating Genetic Risk to Their Relatives. Cancer Nurs 2021; 44:E142-E150. [PMID: 32022782 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000000796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND When a woman is diagnosed with hereditary breast or ovarian cancer, family members may be at high risk of cancers associated with BRCA1/2 gene mutation and benefit from disclosure of the genetic test result. This duty of informing relatives may be distressing, or relatives may not be properly informed. OBJECTIVE To qualitatively describe breast cancer patients' experiences communicating genetic risk of cancer to their relatives. METHODS Probands with BRCA1/2 gene mutations were recruited from an oncology institute in Istanbul, Turkey, and interviewed by telephone. Qualitative content analysis was conducted to derive central elements of the 30 women's experiences communicating genetic risk to their relatives. RESULTS Six themes were identified: response to genetic test results, reason for communication, feelings about communication, reflection after communication, results of communication, and needs. CONCLUSION Women with cancer found to have BRCA1/2 gene mutations tended to share their genetic test results within the family. The main motives for sharing test results were the desire to encourage relatives to get tested and moral and ethical convictions. Women needed explicit information regarding cancer risk and risk-reducing strategies to act upon. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The women's feelings and reflections about the communication process were varied and suggest that personalized genetic risk communication interventions may better support women with BRCA1/2 gene mutations during and after communication with relatives. Long-term follow-up of those women is essential because of the need for informed decision on risk-reducing strategies.
Collapse
|
8
|
Dragojlovic N, Kopac N, Borle K, Tandun R, Salmasi S, Ellis U, Birch P, Adam S, Friedman JM, Elliott AM, Lynd LD. Utilization and uptake of clinical genetics services in high-income countries: A scoping review. Health Policy 2021; 125:877-887. [PMID: 33962789 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Ongoing rapid growth in the need for genetic services has the potential to severely strain the capacity of the clinical genetics workforce to deliver this care. Unfortunately, assessments of the scale of this health policy challenge and potential solutions are hampered by the lack of a consolidated evidence base on the growth in genetic service utilization. To enable health policy research and strategic planning by health systems in this area, we conducted a scoping review of the literature on the utilization and uptake of clinical genetics services in high-income countries published between 2010 and 2018. One-hundred-and-ninety-five unique studies were included in the review. Most focused on cancer (85/195; 44%) and prenatal care (50/195; 26%), which are consistently the two areas with the greatest volume of genetic service utilization in both the United States and other high-income countries. Utilization and uptake rates varied considerably and were influenced by contextual factors including health system characteristics, provider knowledge, and patient preferences. Moreover, growth in genetic service utilization appears to be driven to a significant degree by technological advances and the integration of new tests into clinical care. Our review highlights both the policy challenge posed by the rapid growth in the utilization of genetic services and the variability in this trend across clinical indications and health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nick Dragojlovic
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Nicola Kopac
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Kennedy Borle
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Rachel Tandun
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Shahrzad Salmasi
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Ursula Ellis
- Woodward Library, University of British Columbia, 2198 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Patricia Birch
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, C201 - 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada; BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, 938 West 28th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4H4, Canada
| | - Shelin Adam
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, C201 - 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada; BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, 938 West 28th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4H4, Canada
| | - Jan M Friedman
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, C201 - 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada; BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, 938 West 28th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4H4, Canada
| | | | - Alison M Elliott
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, C201 - 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada; BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, 938 West 28th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4H4, Canada; BC Women's Hospital Research Institute, H214 - 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada
| | - Larry D Lynd
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada; Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences, Providence Health Research Institute, 588-1081 Burrard Street, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gorrie A, Gold J, Cameron C, Krause M, Kincaid H. Benefits and limitations of telegenetics: A literature review. J Genet Couns 2021; 30:924-937. [PMID: 33817891 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Revised: 02/13/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Telegenetics involves the use of technology (generally video conferencing) to remotely provide genetic services. A telegenetics platform is critical for those with limitations or vulnerabilities compromising their ability to attend clinic in-person, including individuals in rural areas. As the demand for remote genetics services increases, and amidst the COVID-19 pandemic with social distancing practices in place, we conducted a literature review to examine the benefits and limitations of telegenetics and explore the views of patients and health professionals utilizing telegenetics. Searches of the PubMed database identified 21 relevant primary studies for inclusion. The majority of studies found acceptability of telegenetics to be high among patients and health professionals and that telegenetics provided access to genetics services for underserved communities. The main benefits cited include cost-effectiveness and reduction in travel time for genetics services providing outreach clinics and patients who would otherwise travel long distances to access genetics. Patients appreciated the convenience of telegenetics including the reduced wait times, although a minority of patients reported their psychosocial needs were not adequately met. Eight studies compared outcomes between telegenetics and in-person services; findings suggested when comparing telegenetics patients to their in-person counterparts, telegenetics patients had a similar level of knowledge and understanding of genetics and similar psychological outcomes. Some studies reported challenges related to establishing rapport and reading and responding to verbal cues via telegenetics, while technical issues were not generally found to be a major limitation. Some service adaptations, for example, counseling strategies, may be required to successfully deliver telegenetics. Further research may be necessary to gather and examine data on how telegenetics outcomes compare to that of in-person genetic counseling and adapt services accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Gorrie
- Department of General Genetics, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Judy Gold
- Independent Consultant, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Carolyn Cameron
- Department of General Genetics, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Molly Krause
- Department of General Genetics, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Helen Kincaid
- Department of General Genetics, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Berliner JL, Cummings SA, Boldt Burnett B, Ricker CN. Risk assessment and genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndromes-Practice resource of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns 2021; 30:342-360. [PMID: 33410258 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Revised: 11/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Cancer risk assessment and genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) are a communication process to inform and prepare patients for genetic test results and the related medical management. An increasing number of healthcare providers are active in the delivery of cancer risk assessment and testing, which can have enormous benefits for enhanced patient care. However, genetics professionals remain key in the multidisciplinary care of at-risk patients and their families, given their training in facilitating patients' understanding of the role of genetics in cancer development, the potential psychological, social, and medical implications associated with cancer risk assessment and genetic testing. A collaborative partnership of non-genetics and genetics experts is the ideal approach to address the growing number of patients at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. The goal of this practice resource is to provide allied health professionals an understanding of the key components of risk assessment for HBOC as well as the use of risk models and published guidelines for medical management. We also highlight what patient types are appropriate for genetic testing, what are the most appropriate test(s) to consider, and when to refer individuals to a genetics professional. This practice resource is intended to serve as a resource for allied health professionals in determining their approach to delivering comprehensive care for families and individuals facing HBOC. The cancer risk and prevalence figures in this document are based on cisgender women and men; the risks for transgender or non-binary individuals have not been studied and therefore remain poorly understood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janice L Berliner
- Genetic Counseling Department, Bay Path University, East Longmeadow, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Charité N Ricker
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Molecular Features and Clinical Management of Hereditary Gynecological Cancers. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21249504. [PMID: 33327492 PMCID: PMC7765001 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21249504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Hereditary gynecological cancers are caused by several inherited genes. Tumors that arise in the female reproductive system, such as ovaries and the uterus, overlap with hereditary cancers. Several hereditary cancer-related genes are important because they might lead to therapeutic targets. Treatment of hereditary cancers should be updated in line with the advent of various new methods of evaluation. Next-generation sequencing has led to rapid, economical genetic analyses that have prompted a concomitant and significant paradigm shift with respect to hereditary cancers. Molecular tumor profiling is an epochal method for determining therapeutic targets. Clinical treatment strategies are now being designed based on biomarkers based on tumor profiling. Furthermore, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines significantly changed the genetic testing process in 2020 to initially consider multi-gene panel (MGP) evaluation. Here, we reviewed the molecular features and clinical management of hereditary gynecological malignancies, such as hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), and Lynch, Li–Fraumeni, Cowden, and Peutz–Jeghers syndromes. We also reviewed cancer-susceptible genes revealed by MGP tests.
Collapse
|
12
|
Snir M, Nazareth S, Simmons E, Hayward L, Ashcraft K, Bristow SL, Esplin ED, Aradhya S. Democratizing genomics: Leveraging software to make genetics an integral part of routine care. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS. PART C, SEMINARS IN MEDICAL GENETICS 2020; 187:14-27. [PMID: 33296144 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Genetic testing can provide definitive molecular diagnoses and guide clinical management decisions from preconception through adulthood. Innovative solutions for scaling clinical genomics services are necessary if they are to transition from a niche specialty to a routine part of patient care. The expertise of specialists, like genetic counselors and medical geneticists, has traditionally been relied upon to facilitate testing and follow-up, and while ideal, this approach is limited in its ability to integrate genetics into primary care. As individuals, payors, and providers increasingly realize the value of genetics in mainstream medicine, several implementation challenges need to be overcome. These include electronic health record integration, patient and provider education, tools to stay abreast of guidelines, and simplification of the test ordering process. Currently, no single platform offers a holistic view of genetic testing that streamlines the entire process across specialties that begins with identifying at-risk patients in mainstream care settings, providing pretest education, facilitating consent and test ordering, and following up as a "genetic companion" for ongoing management. We describe our vision for using software that includes clinical-grade chatbots and decision support tools, with direct access to genetic counselors and pharmacists within a modular, integrated, end-to-end testing journey.
Collapse
|
13
|
Melas M, Subbiah S, Saadat S, Rajurkar S, McDonnell KJ. The Community Oncology and Academic Medical Center Alliance in the Age of Precision Medicine: Cancer Genetics and Genomics Considerations. J Clin Med 2020; 9:E2125. [PMID: 32640668 PMCID: PMC7408957 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9072125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2020] [Revised: 06/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent public policy, governmental regulatory and economic trends have motivated the establishment and deepening of community health and academic medical center alliances. Accordingly, community oncology practices now deliver a significant portion of their oncology care in association with academic cancer centers. In the age of precision medicine, this alliance has acquired critical importance; novel advances in nucleic acid sequencing, the generation and analysis of immense data sets, the changing clinical landscape of hereditary cancer predisposition and ongoing discovery of novel, targeted therapies challenge community-based oncologists to deliver molecularly-informed health care. The active engagement of community oncology practices with academic partners helps with meeting these challenges; community/academic alliances result in improved cancer patient care and provider efficacy. Here, we review the community oncology and academic medical center alliance. We examine how practitioners may leverage academic center precision medicine-based cancer genetics and genomics programs to advance their patients' needs. We highlight a number of project initiatives at the City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center that seek to optimize community oncology and academic cancer center precision medicine interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marilena Melas
- The Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, USA;
| | - Shanmuga Subbiah
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Glendora, CA 91741, USA;
| | - Siamak Saadat
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Colton, CA 92324, USA;
| | - Swapnil Rajurkar
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Upland, CA 91786, USA;
| | - Kevin J. McDonnell
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
- Center for Precision Medicine, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
A Review of the Emergence and Expansion of Cardiovascular Genetic Counseling. CURRENT CARDIOVASCULAR RISK REPORTS 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s12170-019-0631-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
15
|
Esplen MJ, Harrington S, Leung YW, Aronson M, Rothenmund H, Semotiuk K, Wong J, Gallinger S, Dicks E, McLaughlin J. Telephone versus in-person colorectal cancer risk and screening intervention for first-degree relatives: A randomized controlled trial. Cancer 2019; 125:2272-2282. [PMID: 30861097 PMCID: PMC6742581 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2018] [Revised: 01/18/2019] [Accepted: 02/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Having a first-degree relative (FDR) with colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant risk factor for CRC. Counseling for FDRs regarding CRC risk factors and personalized risk is important to improve knowledge and screening compliance. METHODS A 3-arm randomized controlled trial compared tailored in-person and telephone CRC counseling interventions with controls among FDRs who were not mutation carriers for known hereditary cancer syndromes, but who were considered to be at an increased risk based on family history. It was hypothesized that both telephone and in-person approaches would increase CRC knowledge, screening adherence, perceived risk accuracy, and psychosocial functioning compared with controls. The authors anticipated greater satisfaction with the in-person approach. CRC knowledge, risk perception, psychosocial functioning, and intention to screen were assessed at baseline and at 2-week and 2-month follow-ups (primary endpoint). RESULTS A total of 278 FDRs (mean age, 47.4 years, standard deviation, 11.38 years) participated. At baseline, participants reported low to moderate CRC knowledge and overestimations of risk. Screening adherence was 73.7%. At 2 months, participants in the in-person arm and telephone arm demonstrated improvements in knowledge and perceived risk and were not found to be statistically different from each other. However, when comparing each intervention with controls, knowledge in the in-person arm was found to be statistically significantly higher, but the difference between the telephone and control arms was not. Cancer-related stress reduced over time in all groups. Intervention benefits were maintained at 1 year. Baseline screening intent/adherence were high, and therefore did not reach statistically significant improvement. CONCLUSIONS Tailored in-person or telephone formats for providing CRC risk counseling, incorporating behavioral interventions, appear to improve knowledge and risk perceptions, with high client satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Jane Esplen
- de Souza Institute, University Health Network (UHN)
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, UHN
| | | | - Yvonne W Leung
- de Souza Institute, University Health Network (UHN)
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto
| | - Melyssa Aronson
- Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Familial Gastrointestinal Cancer Registry, Mount Sinai Hospital
| | - Heidi Rothenmund
- Winnipeg Regional Health Authority; Department of Genetics & Metabolism, Health Sciences Centre in Winnipeg
| | - Kara Semotiuk
- Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Familial Gastrointestinal Cancer Registry, Mount Sinai Hospital
| | - Jiahui Wong
- de Souza Institute, University Health Network (UHN)
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto
| | - Steven Gallinger
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, UHN
- Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Familial Gastrointestinal Cancer Registry, Mount Sinai Hospital
| | - Elizabeth Dicks
- Faculty of Medicine: Center for Health Informatics and Analytics, Memorial University
| | - John McLaughlin
- Public Health Ontario
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Impact of Implementing B-RST TM to Screen for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer on Risk Perception and Genetic Counseling Uptake Among Women in an Academic Safety Net Hospital. Clin Breast Cancer 2019; 19:e547-e555. [PMID: 31005475 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2019.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2018] [Revised: 02/09/2019] [Accepted: 02/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lower socioeconomic status is strongly associated with decreased perception of cancer risk. Fewer low socioeconomic status women than expected currently access cancer genetic services from which they may benefit. PATIENTS AND METHODS We screened women presenting for a screening mammogram at a safety net academic hospital using the Breast Cancer Genetics Referral Screening Tool Version 3.0 (B-RSTTM), an online tool designed to identify individuals potentially at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Participants screening either positive (high risk) or negative (moderate risk) were offered genetic counseling appointments. We used a brief survey to evaluate change in risk perception before and after using B-RSTTM, and after a genetic counseling appointment, if applicable. Barriers to accepting appointments were assessed when participants declined. RESULTS Of the 126 participants, 91 (72.2%) screened negative-average risk, 13 (10.3%) screened negative-moderate risk, and 22 (17.5%) screened positive. Of those who screened positive or negative-moderate, 24 (68.6%) expressed interested in a genetic counseling appointment, of which 19 (79.2%) scheduled. Four of the 19 scheduled (21.1%) completed the appointment. We found a significant difference in the number who rated their breast cancer risk correctly on the post-test between the groups who self-rated as low, moderate, or high risk. Those who perceived themselves as high risk were the most likely to rate their risk correctly on the post-test (P < .001). CONCLUSION We showed that using B-RSTTM in a safety net academic hospital was effective at identifying women at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.
Collapse
|
17
|
Terry AB, Wylie A, Raspa M, Vogel B, Sanghavi K, Djurdjinovic L, Caggana M, Bodurtha J. Clinical models of telehealth in genetics: A regional telegenetics landscape. J Genet Couns 2019; 28:673-691. [DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2018] [Revised: 12/03/2018] [Accepted: 12/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Alissa B. Terry
- NYMAC Regional Genetics Network; Wadsworth Center; Albany New York
- Genetic Counseling Program; Ferre Institute; Binghamton New York
| | - Amanda Wylie
- NYMAC Regional Genetics Network; Wadsworth Center; Albany New York
- RTI International; Research Triangle Park; North Carolina
| | - Melissa Raspa
- NYMAC Regional Genetics Network; Wadsworth Center; Albany New York
- RTI International; Research Triangle Park; North Carolina
| | - Beth Vogel
- NYMAC Regional Genetics Network; Wadsworth Center; Albany New York
- New York State Department of Health; Wadsworth Center; Albany New York
| | - Kunal Sanghavi
- The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine; Farmington Connecticut
| | | | - Michele Caggana
- NYMAC Regional Genetics Network; Wadsworth Center; Albany New York
- New York State Department of Health; Wadsworth Center; Albany New York
| | - Joann Bodurtha
- NYMAC Regional Genetics Network; Wadsworth Center; Albany New York
- McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine; Johns Hopkins University; Baltimore Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Verma A, Nag S, Hasan Q, Priya Selvakumar V. Mainstreaming genetic counseling for BRCA testing into oncology clinics – Indian perspective. Indian J Cancer 2019; 56:S38-S47. [DOI: 10.4103/ijc.ijc_458_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
19
|
Bovbjerg ML. Current Resources for Evidence-Based Practice, January 2019. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2019; 48:99-111. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogn.2018.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
|
20
|
Next-Generation Service Delivery: A Scoping Review of Patient Outcomes Associated with Alternative Models of Genetic Counseling and Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2018; 10:cancers10110435. [PMID: 30428547 PMCID: PMC6266465 DOI: 10.3390/cancers10110435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2018] [Revised: 11/06/2018] [Accepted: 11/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The combination of increased referral for genetic testing and the current shortage of genetic counselors has necessitated the development and implementation of alternative models of genetic counseling and testing for hereditary cancer assessment. The purpose of this scoping review is to provide an overview of the patient outcomes that are associated with alternative models of genetic testing and genetic counseling for hereditary cancer, including germline-only and tumor testing models. Seven databases were searched, selecting studies that were: (1) full-text articles published ≥2007 or conference abstracts published ≥2015, and (2) assessing patient outcomes of an alternative model of genetic counseling or testing. A total of 79 publications were included for review and synthesis. Data-charting was completed using a data-charting form that was developed by the study team for this review. Seven alternative models were identified, including four models that involved a genetic counselor: telephone, telegenic, group, and embedded genetic counseling models; and three models that did not: mainstreaming, direct, and tumor-first genetic testing models. Overall, these models may be an acceptable alternative to traditional models on knowledge, patient satisfaction, psychosocial measures, and the uptake of genetic testing; however, particular populations may be better served by traditional in-person genetic counseling. As precision medicine initiatives continue to advance, institutions should consider the implementation of new models of genetic service delivery, utilizing a model that will best serve the needs of their unique patient populations.
Collapse
|