1
|
Marxgut L, Desagneaux A, Bellier A, Mouret S, Charles J, Laramas M, Verry C. Outcomes of adjuvant lymph node field radiotherapy and immunotherapy for stage III melanoma. Cancer Radiother 2024:S1278-3218(24)00099-4. [PMID: 39174360 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2024.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE With the promising results of immunotherapy in patients with stage III melanoma, the role of adjuvant radiotherapy after resection and complete lymph-node dissection must be reassessed. We evaluate the outcomes and safety of adjuvant radiotherapy and immunotherapy compared to immunotherapy only in patients with resected stage III melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS This retrospective and single institution study included patients treated for a stage III melanoma with complete lymph-node dissection and adjuvant immunotherapy from January 2019 to December 2022. The radiotherapy associated with immunotherapy group was defined by completion of immunotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy in the lymph-node dissection area. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival. The secondary endpoints were locoregional progression, incidence of adverse events grade 3 or above and disease-free survival rate in patients with high risk of locoregional recurrence. RESULTS Thirty-three patients were included. Among them, twelve received adjuvant lymph-node field radiotherapy. The median duration of follow-up was 17months (range: 8-45months). Patients receiving radiotherapy and immunotherapy had a significantly higher disease stage and more frequent extracapsular extension. At 12months, the disease-free survival rate was 66.7% for the patients receiving immunotherapy alone (95% CI: 42.5-82.5%) and 83.3% for those receiving radiotherapy and immunotherapy (95% CI: 48.2-95.6%; P=0.131). The locoregional progression rate was 24% in patients receiving immunotherapy and 8% in patients receiving immunotherapy and radiotherapy (P=0.379). After adjuvant treatment, 6% of patients developed grade 3 or above immunotherapy-related events and none developed grade 3 or above radiation-related adverse events. CONCLUSION In patients with stage III melanoma, adjuvant lymph-node field radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy seems to be associated with longer disease-free survival, with acceptable tolerance. However, these results need to be confirmed by long-term and prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Marxgut
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU Grenoble Alpes, avenue Maquis-du-Grésivaudan, 38700 La Tronche, France.
| | - A Desagneaux
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU Grenoble Alpes, avenue Maquis-du-Grésivaudan, 38700 La Tronche, France
| | - A Bellier
- Department of Dermatology, CHU Grenoble Alpes, avenue Maquis-du-Grésivaudan, 38700 La Tronche, France
| | - S Mouret
- Department of Clinical Investigation Research, CHU Grenoble Alpes, avenue Maquis-du-Grésivaudan, 38700 La Tronche, France
| | - J Charles
- Department of Clinical Investigation Research, CHU Grenoble Alpes, avenue Maquis-du-Grésivaudan, 38700 La Tronche, France
| | - M Laramas
- Department of Oncology, CHU Grenoble Alpes, avenue Maquis-du-Grésivaudan, 38700 La Tronche, France
| | - C Verry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU Grenoble Alpes, avenue Maquis-du-Grésivaudan, 38700 La Tronche, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lei PJ, Fraser C, Jones D, Ubellacker JM, Padera TP. Lymphatic system regulation of anti-cancer immunity and metastasis. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1449291. [PMID: 39211044 PMCID: PMC11357954 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1449291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Cancer dissemination to lymph nodes (LN) is associated with a worse prognosis, increased incidence of distant metastases and reduced response to therapy. The LN microenvironment puts selective pressure on cancer cells, creating cells that can survive in LN as well as providing survival advantages for distant metastatic spread. Additionally, the presence of cancer cells leads to an immunosuppressive LN microenvironment, favoring the evasion of anti-cancer immune surveillance. However, recent studies have also characterized previously unrecognized roles for tumor-draining lymph nodes (TDLNs) in cancer immunotherapy response, including acting as a reservoir for pre-exhausted CD8+ T cells and stem-like CD8+ T cells. In this review, we will discuss the spread of cancer cells through the lymphatic system, the roles of TDLNs in metastasis and anti-cancer immune responses, and the therapeutic opportunities and challenges in targeting LN metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pin-Ji Lei
- Edwin L. Steele Laboratories for Tumor Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Cameron Fraser
- Department of Molecular Metabolism, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Dennis Jones
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jessalyn M. Ubellacker
- Department of Molecular Metabolism, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Timothy P. Padera
- Edwin L. Steele Laboratories for Tumor Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schmidt M, Hohberg M, Felcht M, Kühn T, Eichbaum M, Krause BJ, Zöphel BK, Kotzerke J. [Nuclear medicine procedure guideline for sentinel lymph node localization]. Nuklearmedizin 2024; 63:233-246. [PMID: 38788776 DOI: 10.1055/a-2319-8306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
The authors present a procedure guideline for scintigraphic detection of sentinel lymph nodes in malignant melanoma, in breast cancer, in penile and vulva tumors, in head and neck cancer, and in prostate carcinoma. Important goals of sentinel lymph node scintigraphy comprise reduction of the extent of surgery, lower postoperative morbidity and optimization of histopathological examination focussing on relevant lymph nodes. Sentinel lymph node scintigraphy itself does not diagnose tumorous lymph node involvement and is not indicated when lymph node or distant metastases have been definitely diagnosed before sentinel lymph node scintigraphy. Procedures are compiled with the aim to reliably localise sentinel lymph nodes with a high detection rate typically in early tumour stages. New aspects in this guideline are new radiopharmaceuticals such as tilmanocept and Tc-99m-PSMA and SPECT/CT allowing an easier anatomical orientation. Initial dynamic lymphoscintigraphy in breast cancer is of little significance nowadays. Radiation exposure is low so that pregnancy is not a contraindication for sentinel lymph node scintigraphy. A one-day protocol should preferentially be used. Even with high volumes of scintigraphic sentinel lymph node procedures surgeons, theatre staff and pathologists receive a radiation exposure < 1 mSv/year so that they do not require occupational radiation surveillance. Aspects of quality control were included (scintigraphy, quality control of gamma probe, 6 h SLN course for surgeons, certified breast centers, medical surveillance center).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Köln
| | - M Hohberg
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Köln
| | - M Felcht
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim (Vertreter der DDG)
| | - T Kühn
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Esslingen (Vertreter der DGGG - Mamma-Ca)
| | - M Eichbaum
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und gynäkologische Onkologie, Helios Dr.-Horst-Schmidt-Kliniken Wiesbaden (Vertreter der DGGG - Genitaltumoren)
| | - B J Krause
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Rostock
| | - B K Zöphel
- Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Klinikum Chemnitz
| | - J Kotzerke
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Dresden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kakish H, Jung CA, Doh SJ, Mulligan KM, Sheng I, Ammori JB, Mangla A, Hoehn RS, Rothermel LD. The Utility of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Elderly Patients with Melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15684-0. [PMID: 39039381 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15684-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is performed less often for older patients with melanoma. We investigated the association of SLNB and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) in the elderly. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER: 2010-2019) for patients ≥ 70 years with cT2-4N0M0 melanoma. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazard models to evaluate the impact of SLNB performance and SLN status on MSS at increasing age cutoffs. In addition, we evaluated the association of different factors with SLNB performance using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS We identified 11,548 patients. Sentinel lymph node biopsy occurred in 6754 (58.5%) patients, 1050 (15.5%) of whom had a positive SLN. On adjusted SEER analysis, a negative SLN was independently associated with improved MSS (overall hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.67) for patients up to 87 years old. Positive SLNB was independently associated with inferior MSS (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.93-1.98). Increasing age groups were significantly associated with decreased SLNB performance. CONCLUSIONS Sentinel lymph node biopsy is associated with cancer-specific survival and adds prognostic information for elderly patients with melanoma. Sentinel lymph node biopsy performance should not be eliminated in elderly patients based on age alone, unless justified by poor performance status, patient preference, or other surgical contraindications. Decreased SLNB performance with increasing age in our cohort may indicate a missed therapeutic opportunity in the care of elderly patients with melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna Kakish
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Carmen A Jung
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Susan J Doh
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Iris Sheng
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - John B Ammori
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ankit Mangla
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Richard S Hoehn
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Luke D Rothermel
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kfir U, Ronen O. Intraparotid Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15668-0. [PMID: 38954096 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15668-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical management of head and neck cutaneous melanoma (HNCM) has evolved tremendously since sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become the prominent tool of prognosis and staging. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficiency of intraparotid SLNB compared with a more extensive surgery of superficial parotidectomy (SP). METHODS The electronic database of PubMed and Scopus were searched for publications until 10 March 2022. In addition, the study included data of patients from our institution who underwent cherry-picking procedures. Pooled estimates were calculated using the random-effects model. Heterogeneity was calculated using the I2 test. RESULTS The pooled result regarding the rate of SLNB excision success was 97 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.95-0.99; p < 0.0001), and the pooled probability of a positive SLNB result was 16 % (95 % CI 0.12-0.20; p < 0.0001). Failure of SLNB had pooled results of 4 % (95 % CI 0.02-0.06; p < 0.0009). For SP, no study examining N0 HNCM patients has met the authors' inclusion criteria. Cherry-picking SLNB had temporary and permanent facial nerve paralysis relative risks (RRs) of 0.12 (95 % CI 0.06-0.27; p < 0.0001) and 0.46 (95 % CI 0.17-1.22; p < 0.0001), respectively, compared with historical data from four weighted meta-analyses of SP. CONCLUSIONS The data from this study suggest that intraparotid SLNB performed for N0 HNCM patients is a safe and reliable procedure, with very low complication rates. Failure of the procedure did not exceed 4 %. Therefore, intraparotid SLNB may be superior to an extensive surgery such as SP and should be examined in future prospective trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uriel Kfir
- Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel
| | - Ohad Ronen
- Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel.
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Galilee Medical Center, 221001, Nahariya, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Karakousi T, Mudianto T, Lund AW. Lymphatic vessels in the age of cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2024; 24:363-381. [PMID: 38605228 DOI: 10.1038/s41568-024-00681-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
Lymphatic transport maintains homeostatic health and is necessary for immune surveillance, and yet lymphatic growth is often associated with solid tumour development and dissemination. Although tumour-associated lymphatic remodelling and growth were initially presumed to simply expand a passive route for regional metastasis, emerging research puts lymphatic vessels and their active transport at the interface of metastasis, tumour-associated inflammation and systemic immune surveillance. Here, we discuss active mechanisms through which lymphatic vessels shape their transport function to influence peripheral tissue immunity and the current understanding of how tumour-associated lymphatic vessels may both augment and disrupt antitumour immune surveillance. We end by looking forward to emerging areas of interest in the field of cancer immunotherapy in which lymphatic vessels and their transport function are likely key players: the formation of tertiary lymphoid structures, immune surveillance in the central nervous system, the microbiome, obesity and ageing. The lessons learnt support a working framework that defines the lymphatic system as a key determinant of both local and systemic inflammatory networks and thereby a crucial player in the response to cancer immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Triantafyllia Karakousi
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tenny Mudianto
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amanda W Lund
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Pathology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Thompson JF. The evolution of melanomology: a tale of giants' shoulders and bold hypotheses. Surg Oncol 2024:102094. [PMID: 38830788 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Baecher H, Gerken M, Knoedler L, Knoedler S, Alfertshofer M, Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Berneburg M, Drexler K, Haferkamp S. Complete lymph node dissection in cutaneous melanoma patients with positive sentinel lymph node: Outcome and predictors in a retrospective cohort study over 16 years. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2024; 92:33-47. [PMID: 38489985 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.02.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In melanoma treatment, complete lymph node dissection (CLND) has been considered the therapeutic gold standard in patients with positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). This long-held approach was revised in 2017, with recent evidence questioning the therapeutic benefit of CLND in malignant melanoma (MM) therapy. In this study, we aimed to fill this knowledge gap by retrospectively analyzing the impact of CLND on MM patients' survival. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the multi-center population-based Clinical Cancer Registry at the Tumor Center Regensburg (TUDOK) database (2004-2020) to identify patients who had been diagnosed with SLN-positive MM and underwent (non)invasive management thereof. Patient cohorts were subdivided according to the treatment received (CLND and waiving CLND). Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and cumulative recurrence rate. RESULTS We identified 1143 MM patients, of whom 126 (11.0%) had positive SLN status. CLND was waived in the majority of SLN-positive MM cases (n = 71; 56.3%), with 55 (43.7%) patients undergoing CLND. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression revealed no significant advantage for CLND patients compared to non-CLND patients in OS (HR=0.970, p = 0.915 and HR=1.295, p = 0.479, respectively), RFS (HR=1.050, p = 0.849 and HR=1.220, p = 0.544, respectively), and cumulative recurrence rate (HR=1.234, p = 0.441 and HR=1.220, p = 0.544), respectively). CONCLUSION We found that CLND had no significant impact on patient survival and MM recurrence rate, thus corroborating the validity of current clinical guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Baecher
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Michael Gerken
- Bavarian Cancer Registry, Regional Centre Regensburg, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Leonard Knoedler
- Department of Plastic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Samuel Knoedler
- Department of Plastic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael Alfertshofer
- Division of Hand, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke
- Tumor Center, Institute for Quality Management and Health Services Research, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Mark Berneburg
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Konstantin Drexler
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Haferkamp
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kong W, Wang C, Wang H, Liu H, Mu J, Jiang J, Zhang C. Hyperosmotic cold shock mouse melanoma cells encapsulated with doxorubicin for targeted treatment of melanoma. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1403719. [PMID: 38751816 PMCID: PMC11094257 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1403719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The primary treatment strategies for melanoma include surgical excision, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. However, the efficacy of these treatments is often limited by drug resistance, recurrence, and severe side effects. Therefore, we aimed to develop a targeted drug delivery system capable of selectively locating tumor sites to minimize systemic toxicity and enhance therapeutic efficacy. This cell drug delivery system can also deliver chemotherapeutic drugs to the tumor microenvironment. Methods We treated B16F10 cells with hyperosmotic cold shock (HCS) to obtain and characterize HCS cells. We then investigated the anti-tumor effects and immune activation capabilities of these cells and explored their potential as a targeted drug delivery system. Results HCS cells not only maintained an intact cellular structure and tumor antigens but also exhibited high expression of the homologous melanoma-associated antigen glycoprotein 100. These cells demonstrated an exceptional capacity for loading and releasing doxorubicin, which has chemotherapeutic anti-tumor effects. HCS cells can precisely target the tumor microenvironment to minimize systemic toxicity, inducing an immune response by activating CD3+ and CD4+ T cells. Conclusion HCS cells are non-carcinogenic, with both cellular and tumor antigens intact; thus, they are suitable drug delivery carriers. Our findings highlight the potential of HCS cells for carrying doxorubicin because of their high drug-loading efficiency, effective tumor-targeting and anti-tumor effects. Therefore, our results will facilitate the development of melanoma treatments that have higher efficacy than those in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weihui Kong
- Department of Stomatology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Chengran Wang
- Scientific Research Center, China-Japan Union Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Hui Wang
- Scientific Research Center, China-Japan Union Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Haiou Liu
- Department of Stomatology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Jianhui Mu
- Spine Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Jinlan Jiang
- Scientific Research Center, China-Japan Union Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Congxiao Zhang
- Department of Stomatology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shen C, Shah JK, Cevallos P, Nazerali R, Rosen JM. Lymphadenectomy After Melanoma-A National Analysis of Recurrence Rates and Risk of Lymphedema. Ann Plast Surg 2024; 92:S284-S292. [PMID: 38556691 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000003867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Treatment for melanoma after a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy includes nodal observation or lymphadenectomy. Important considerations for management, however, involve balancing the risk of recurrence and the risk of lymphedema after lymphadenectomy. METHODS From the Merative MarketScan Research Databases, adult patients were queried from 2007 to 2021. International Classification of Disease, Ninth (ICD-9) and Tenth (ICD-10) Editions, diagnosis codes and Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify patients with melanoma diagnoses who underwent an index melanoma excision with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Main outcomes were completion lymph node dissection (CLND) utilization after a positive SLNB, developing lymphedema with or without CLND, and nodal basin recurrence 3 months or more after index excision. Subanalyses stratified by index excision year (2007-2017 and 2018-2021) and propensity score matched were additionally conducted. Demographics and comorbidities (measured by Elixhauser index) were recorded. RESULTS A total of 153,085,453 patients were identified. Of those, 359,298 had a diagnosis of melanoma, and 202,456 patients underwent an excision procedure. The study cohort comprised 3717 patients with a melanoma diagnosis who underwent an excision procedure and had a positive SLNB. The mean age of the study cohort was 49 years, 57% were male, 41% were geographically located in the South, and 24% had an Elixhauser index of 4+. Among the 350 patients who did not undergo CLND, 10% experienced recurrence and 22% developed lymphedema. A total of 3367 patients underwent CLND, of which 8% experienced recurrence and 20% developed lymphedema. Completion lymph node dissection did not significantly affect risk of recurrence [odds ratio (OR), 1.370, P = 0.090] or lymphedema (OR, 1.114, P = 0.438). After stratification and propensity score matching, odds of experiencing lymphedema (OR, 1.604, P = 0.058) and recurrence (OR, 1.825, P = 0.058) after CLND were not significantly affected. Rates of CLND had significantly decreased (P < 0.001) overtime, without change in recurrence rate (P = 0.063). CONCLUSIONS Electing for nodal observation does not increase the risk of recurrence or reduce risk of lymphedema. Just as CLND does not confer survival benefit, its decreased utilization has not increased recurrence rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Shen
- From the Section of Plastic Reconstructive Surgery, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - Jennifer K Shah
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Priscila Cevallos
- From the Section of Plastic Reconstructive Surgery, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - Rahim Nazerali
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Joseph M Rosen
- From the Section of Plastic Reconstructive Surgery, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Roshan A, Shah B, Anderson KD, Murphy S, Thomas B, McPhee AS, Lamb BW, Durrani AJ, Patel AJK. Robot-Assisted Pelvic Dissection for Enlarged Lymph Nodes in Melanoma Improves Recovery with Equivalent Oncological Outcomes to Open Pelvic Dissection. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:2727-2736. [PMID: 38177461 PMCID: PMC10908615 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14834-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robot-assisted pelvic lymph node dissection (rPLND) has been reported in heterogenous groups of patients with melanoma, including macroscopic or at-high-risk-for microscopic metastasis. With changing indications for surgery in melanoma, and availability of effective systemic therapies, pelvic dissection is now performed for clinically detected bulky lymph node metastasis followed by adjuvant drug therapy. rPLND has not been compared with open pelvic lymph node dissection (oPLND) for modern practice. METHODS All patients undergoing pelvic node dissection for macroscopic melanoma at a single institution were reviewed as a cohort, observational study. RESULTS Twenty-two pelvic lymph node dissections were identified (8 oPLND; 14 rPLND). The number of pelvic lymph nodes removed was similar (median oPLND 6.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 6.0-12.5] versus rPLND 6.0 [3.75-9.0]), with frequent matted nodes (11/22, 50.0%). Operative time (median oPLND 130 min [IQR 95.5-182] versus rPLND 126 min [IQR 97.8-160]) and complications (Clavien-Dindo scale) were similar. Length of hospital stay (median 5.34 days (IQR 3.77-6.94) versus 1.98 days (IQR 1.39-3.50) and time to postoperative adjuvant therapy (median 11.6 weeks [IQR 10.6-18.5] versus 7.71 weeks [IQR 6.29-10.4]) were shorter in the rPLND group. No differences in pelvic lymph node recurrence (p = 0.984), distant metastatic recurrence (p = 0.678), or melanoma-specific survival (p = 0.655) were seen (median follow-up 21.1 months [rPLND] and 25.7 months [oPLND]). CONCLUSIONS rPLND is an effective way to remove bulky pelvic lymph nodes in melanoma, with a shorter recovery and reduced interval to initiating adjuvant therapy compared with oPLND. This group of patients may especially benefit from neoadjuvant systemic approaches to management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Roshan
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Bhumi Shah
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Keith D Anderson
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Suzanne Murphy
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Benjamin Thomas
- Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne and International Medical Robotics Academy, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Arthur S McPhee
- Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Benjamin W Lamb
- Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Urology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London and University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Amer J Durrani
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Animesh J K Patel
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Koizumi S, Inozume T, Nakamura Y. Current surgical management for melanoma. J Dermatol 2024; 51:312-323. [PMID: 38149725 DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.17086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
Melanoma is a major malignant cutaneous neoplasm with a high mortality rate. In recent years, the treatment of melanoma has developed dramatically with the invention of new therapeutic agents, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and molecular-targeted agents. These agents are available as adjuvant therapies for postoperative patients with stage IIB, IIC, and III melanomas. Furthermore, neoadjuvant therapy has been studied in several global clinical trials and has demonstrated promising and favorable clinical efficacy, mainly in patients with palpable regional lymph nodes. A recent large phase III clinical trial investigating early lymph node dissection for sentinel lymph node metastases demonstrated no survival benefits. Based on these data, surgery should be reconsidered as an appropriate treatment modality for melanoma. The need for invasive surgical procedures will be reduced with the invention of effective adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies and novel clinical trial data on regional lymph node dissection. However, surgery still plays an important role in treating early-stage melanoma, accurately determining the disease stage, and effective palliative treatment for advanced melanoma. In this article, we focus on surgery for primary tumors, regional lymph nodes, and metastatic sites in an era of remarkably revolutionary drug treatments for melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shigeru Koizumi
- Department of Skin Oncology/Dermatology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
- Department of Dermatology, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | | | - Yasuhiro Nakamura
- Department of Skin Oncology/Dermatology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Benesch MGK, Skitzki JJ. Impact of anesthesia choice in cutaneous melanoma surgery. Melanoma Res 2024; 34:16-21. [PMID: 37924527 PMCID: PMC10842619 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Abstract
Invasive cutaneous melanoma is the most lethal skin cancer, but fortunately, the vast majority can be surgically treated with wide local excision, and sometimes additionally with sentinel or index lymph node biopsy for prognostication. Melanomas are particularly immunogenic malignancies, and preclinical studies have demonstrated that use of volatile anesthetics and opioids, unlike local agents, can suppress the immune system during the perioperative period. Immunosuppression has implications for creating a potentially favorable microenvironment for the survival and propagation of residual melanoma cells or micro-metastases, which could lead to disease relapse, both in the local tumor bed and distally. Results from observational clinical studies are mixed, but the literature would suggest that patients are at risk of decreased melanoma-specific survival after undergoing general anesthesia compared to regional anesthesia and spinal blocks. With the safety of close observation now established rather than automatic completion or total lymph node dissection for patients with either a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy or significant clinical response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy after index node sampling, the indications for definitive surgery with local or regional anesthesia have increased tremendously in recent years. Therefore, cutaneous melanoma patients might benefit from avoidance of general anesthesia and other perioperative drugs that suppress cell-mediated immunity if the option to circumvent systemic anesthesia agents is feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew G K Benesch
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wilson AK, Lourdault K, Ostad T, Stern S, Essner R. Is therapeutic lymph node dissection of value for lymph node recurrence in melanoma? Am J Surg 2024; 228:258-263. [PMID: 37923660 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Therapeutic lymphadenectomy (TLND) is still performed in most melanoma patients to treat nodal recurrences after initial negative lymph node biopsy (-SLNB), despite the lack of evidence for survival benefit. We sought to compare melanoma-specific survival (MSS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) of patients who underwent TLND versus no TLND using our institutional and MSTL-1 databases. METHODS We identified 146 patients with nodal recurrence following -SLNB: 132 underwent TLND and 14 did not. DMFS and MSS were evaluated for the cohorts followed by a matched-pair analysis between the cohorts. RESULTS No difference was observed in five-year DMFS (p = 0.454) and five-year MSS (p = 0.945) between the two groups. The matched-pair analysis showed similar results (p = 0.329 and p = 0.363 for DMSF and MSS, respectively). CONCLUSIONS From this limited retrospective study, TLND for nodal recurrence after a -SLNB does not appear to improve DMFS or MSS in melanoma patients compared to no TLND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana K Wilson
- Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Department of Surgical Oncology, Santa Monica, CA, United States
| | - Kristel Lourdault
- Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Melanoma and CutaneousOncology Laboratory, Santa Monica, CA, United States
| | - Tara Ostad
- Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Melanoma and CutaneousOncology Laboratory, Santa Monica, CA, United States
| | - Stacey Stern
- Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Data Management/Biostatistics, Santa Monica, CA, United States
| | - Richard Essner
- Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Melanoma and CutaneousOncology Laboratory, Santa Monica, CA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gyurdzhyan S, Muralidharan V, Liu LY, Sunwoo JB, Zaba LC, Swetter SM. Nodal ultrasound for regional recurrence detection in sentinel lymph node biopsy-positive cutaneous melanoma patients undergoing cross-sectional imaging. SKIN HEALTH AND DISEASE 2024; 4:e305. [PMID: 38312253 PMCID: PMC10831564 DOI: 10.1002/ski2.305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Samvel Gyurdzhyan
- Department of DermatologyPigmented Lesion and Melanoma ProgramStanford University Medical Center and Cancer InstituteStanfordCaliforniaUSA
- Stanford University School of MedicineStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - Vijaytha Muralidharan
- Department of DermatologyPigmented Lesion and Melanoma ProgramStanford University Medical Center and Cancer InstituteStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - Lucy Y. Liu
- Department of DermatologyPigmented Lesion and Melanoma ProgramStanford University Medical Center and Cancer InstituteStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - John B. Sunwoo
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck SurgeryStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - Lisa C. Zaba
- Department of DermatologyPigmented Lesion and Melanoma ProgramStanford University Medical Center and Cancer InstituteStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - Susan M. Swetter
- Department of DermatologyPigmented Lesion and Melanoma ProgramStanford University Medical Center and Cancer InstituteStanfordCaliforniaUSA
- Dermatology ServiceVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care SystemPalo AltoCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kumar A, Kulkarni S, Pandey A, Mutalik S, Subramanian S. Nano-tracers for sentinel lymph node detection: current trends in technique and application. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2024; 19:59-77. [PMID: 38197375 DOI: 10.2217/nnm-2023-0271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection and biopsy is a critical staging component for several cancers. Apart from established methods using dyes or radiolabeled colloids, newer techniques are emerging, like near-infrared fluorescent compounds, targeted molecular radiopharmaceuticals and magnetic nano-tracers. In the overview section of this review, we categorize SLN detection tracers based on their principle of use. We discuss the merits of existing tracers and provide a glimpse of in-development formulations. A subsequent clinical section explores the expanded role of SLN detection in management of various cancers, citing current medical guidelines and the leading conclusions of long-term clinical trials. The concluding section tries to provide a perspective of promising developments and the work required to bring them to clinical fruition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anuj Kumar
- Radiopharmaceuticals Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, 400085, India
| | - Sanjay Kulkarni
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India
| | - Abhijeet Pandey
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India
| | - Srinivas Mutalik
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India
| | - Suresh Subramanian
- Radiopharmaceuticals Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, 400085, India
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Delclaux I, Ventre KS, Jones D, Lund AW. The tumor-draining lymph node as a reservoir for systemic immune surveillance. Trends Cancer 2024; 10:28-37. [PMID: 37863720 PMCID: PMC10843049 DOI: 10.1016/j.trecan.2023.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
Early in solid tumor development, antigens are presented in tumor-draining lymph nodes (tdLNs), a process that is necessary to set up immune surveillance. Recent evidence indicates that tdLNs fuel systemic tumor-specific T cell responses which may halt cancer progression and facilitate future responses to immunotherapy. These protective responses, however, are subject to progressive dysfunction exacerbated by lymph node (LN) metastasis. We discuss emerging preclinical and clinical literature indicating that the tdLN is a crucial reservoir for systemic immunity that can potentiate immune surveillance. We also discuss the impact of LN metastasis and argue that a better understanding of the relationship between LN metastasis and systemic immunity will be necessary to direct regional disease management in the era of immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ines Delclaux
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University (NYU) Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katherine S Ventre
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University (NYU) Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dennis Jones
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Amanda W Lund
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University (NYU) Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Department of Pathology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hu T, Xu Y, Yan W, Wang C, Sun W, Kong Y, Chen Y. Prognostic value of the number of biopsied sentinel lymph nodes for Chinese patients with melanoma: A single-center retrospective study. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2023; 7:e1958. [PMID: 38148035 PMCID: PMC10849921 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) helps to determine accurate pathological stages and facilitates strategies for regional disease control in melanoma. However, whether the number of biopsied sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) influences the patients' survival is rarely investigated. METHODS Acral or cutaneous melanoma patients with no history of nodal disease who received SLNB in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. Clinicopathological variables including Breslow index, ulceration, number of positive SLNs, SLN/non-SLN status were analyzed. The pathologic nodal (pN) stage and pathological stage were defined. RESULTS A total of 381 eligible patients were enrolled in this study, of whom 132 (34.7%) patients were diagnosed with SLN-positive. The median number of biopsied SLNs was 2 (range: 1 to 20). Different numbers of biopsied SLNs did not influence the release-free survival (RFS) of the general patients. However, patients with >2 SLNs had a longer RFS than those with 1-2 SLNs in T4, N1a group and those who rejected complete lymph node dissection (CLND). CONCLUSIONS In patients with T4 melanomas, N1a melanomas and those that did not undergo a CLND, the prognosis of those with three or more SLNs retrieved seemed to be improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tu Hu
- Department of Musculoskeletal SurgeryFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical CollegeFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Yu Xu
- Department of Musculoskeletal SurgeryFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical CollegeFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Wangjun Yan
- Department of Musculoskeletal SurgeryFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical CollegeFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Chunmeng Wang
- Department of Musculoskeletal SurgeryFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical CollegeFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Wei Sun
- Department of Musculoskeletal SurgeryFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical CollegeFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Yunyi Kong
- Department of PathologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Yong Chen
- Department of Musculoskeletal SurgeryFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical CollegeFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
de Menezes JN, Arra DASM, Lôbo MM, Pinto CAL, Lima JPSN, Silva MJB, Duprat Neto JP, Bertolli E. Recurrence Patterns and Clinical Management after a Positive Sentinel Node Biopsy in Melanoma Patients. Cancer Invest 2023; 41:830-836. [PMID: 37962565 DOI: 10.1080/07357907.2023.2283459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
Introduction melanoma patients who become stage III after a positive sentinel node biopsy (SNB) may have several patterns of recurrence patients and methods retrospective analysis of melanoma patients who have undergone SNB in a single institution from 2000 to 2015. Results There were 111 recurrences (45.1%) among 246 (20.3%) SNB positive patients and median DRFS was 77.7 months. After initial treatment, further recurrences occurred in 68 (77.3%) patients, regardless the site of initial recurrence conclusions multimodal strategies are recommended to achieve better results when managing stage III melanoma patients after a positive SNB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dante A S M Arra
- Surgical Oncology Residence Program, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Matheus M Lôbo
- Skin Cancer Department, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - João P Duprat Neto
- Skin Cancer Department, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Eduardo Bertolli
- Skin Cancer Department, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Reticker-Flynn NE, Engleman EG. Lymph nodes: at the intersection of cancer treatment and progression. Trends Cell Biol 2023; 33:1021-1034. [PMID: 37149414 PMCID: PMC10624650 DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2023.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
Metastasis to lymph nodes (LNs) is a common feature of disease progression in most solid organ malignancies. Consequently, LN biopsy and lymphadenectomy are common clinical practices, not only because of their diagnostic utility but also as a means of deterring further metastatic spread. LN metastases have the potential to seed additional tissues and can induce metastatic tolerance, a process by which tumor-specific immune tolerance in LNs promotes further disease progression. Nonetheless, phylogenetic studies have revealed that distant metastases are not necessarily derived from nodal metastases. Furthermore, immunotherapy efficacy is increasingly being attributed to initiation of systemic immune responses within LNs. We argue that lymphadenectomy and nodal irradiation should be approached with caution, particularly in patients receiving immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan E Reticker-Flynn
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| | - Edgar G Engleman
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hsu CC, Liao YH, Sheen YS. Survival benefit of sentinel lymph node biopsy in Asian melanoma patients. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 2023; 36:522-530. [PMID: 37468225 DOI: 10.1111/pcmr.13113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) provides important prognostic information for early-stage melanomas. However, statistics regarding the survival comparison between SLNB and nodal observation in Asia, where acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) predominates, are limited. This study aimed to identify if SLNB offered survival benefits over nodal observation in early-stage melanomas in Taiwan. The retrospective study included 227 patients who met the SLNB criteria according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and were treated at National Taiwan University Hospital from June 1997 to June 2021. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression models. Of the study population, ALM accounted for 73.1%; 161 patients (70.9%) underwent SLNB and 66 patients (29.1%) were under nodal observation. Multivariate analysis showed significantly improved melanoma-specific survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.6; p = .02) in the SLNB group. Among those who underwent completion lymph node dissection (CLND), the non-sentinel node positivity rate was 44.4%. Immediate CLND resulted in significantly longer melanoma-specific survival and distant-metastasis-free survival (DMFS) compared to nodal observation. (HR, 0.2; p = .01 for melanoma-specific survival. HR, 0.3; p = .046 for DMFS). In conclusion, SLNB may provide survival benefits of cutaneous melanoma over nodal observation in the Taiwanese population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Che-Chia Hsu
- Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Hua Liao
- Department of Dermatology, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Shuan Sheen
- Department of Dermatology, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Zhong J, Zou Z, Hu T, Sun W, Wang C, Yan W, Luo Z, Liu X, Xu Y, Chen Y. Survival impact of immediate complete lymph node dissection for Chinese acral and cutaneous melanoma with micrometastasis in sentinel nodes: a retrospective study. Clin Exp Med 2023; 23:4003-4010. [PMID: 37300655 PMCID: PMC10618307 DOI: 10.1007/s10238-023-01107-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has become a critical part of standard surgical treatment for melanoma with no clinical metastatic evidence. However, for patients with a positive sentinel node, the MSLT-II and DeCOG-SLT trials have shown that immediate complete lymph node dissection (CLND) does not bring further survival benefits. There is still an argument among the Chinese population dominated by acral subtypes on whether CLND can be omitted. Thus, this study aims to investigate the impact of immediate CLND on relapse-free survival (RFS) in Chinese melanoma patients with a positive sentinel node. Patients with acral or cutaneous melanoma of clinical Stages I-II who received SNB procedure and were detected with nodal micrometastasis were retrospectively collected at Fudan University Cancer Center (FUSCC) from January 2017 to December 2021. The clinicopathologic features and prognostic factors for RFS were analyzed. Out of 381 patients who received SNB in the past 5 years, 130 (34%) cases with SN micrometastasis detected were included in this study. Ninety-nine patients underwent immediate CLND while the other 31 patients received observation alone. Among patients who received CLND, the non-SN(NSN)-positive rate was 22.2%. Most of the clinicopathologic factors were balanced well between the CLND and non-CLND groups. However, more patients in the CLND group were detected with BRAF and NRAS mutation (P = 0.006) and received adjuvant PD-1 monotherapy (P = 0.042) as well. There were slightly fewer N1 patients in the CLND group, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.075). The study found no significant difference in RFS between the two groups (P = 0.184). Even for patients with the acral subtype (P = 0.925), primary T4 lesion (P = 0.769), or presence of ulceration (P = 0.249), immediate CLND did not bring more survival benefits. Immediate CLND did not bring further RFS benefit for Chinese melanoma patients with SN micrometastasis in real-world clinical practice, even for patients with acral subtype or more tumor burden such as thick Breslow invasion and ulceration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingqin Zhong
- Department of Musculoskeletal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Zijian Zou
- Department of Musculoskeletal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Tu Hu
- Department of Musculoskeletal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Sun
- Department of Musculoskeletal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Chunmeng Wang
- Department of Musculoskeletal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Wangjun Yan
- Department of Musculoskeletal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhiguo Luo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Xin Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu Xu
- Department of Musculoskeletal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
| | - Yong Chen
- Department of Musculoskeletal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kesmodel SB, Kronenfeld JP, Zhao W, Koru-Sengul T, Goel N, Weingrad DN, Hernandez-Aya L, Lutzky J, Feun L, Garland-Kledzik M, Crystal JS. Omission of Completion Lymph Node Dissection in Sentinel Node Biopsy Positive Head and Neck Cutaneous Melanoma Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:7671-7685. [PMID: 37639029 PMCID: PMC10883719 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14036-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent studies evaluating patients with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB+) show no melanoma-specific survival difference between patients undergoing lymph node basin surveillance and completion lymph node dissection (CLND). This has been broadly applied, despite underrepresentation of head and neck (HN) cutaneous melanoma patients. We evaluated whether this was upheld in the HN melanoma cohort. METHODS Patients with HN melanoma with a SLNB+ were selected from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2012 to 2019. Overall survival (OS) of patients who underwent SLNB only versus SLNB + CLND were compared. Subgroup analyses were performed based on pathologic N (pN) and receipt of immunotherapy. Adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. RESULTS Analysis of 634 patients with multivariable Cox regression showed no difference in OS in SLNB only versus SLNB + CLND cohorts (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-1.81; p = 0.610). Charlson-Deyo score (CDS) 1 versus 0 (HR 1.70; 95% CI 1.10-2.63; p = 0.016), pN2+ versus pN1 (HR 1.74; 95% CI 1.23-2.45; p = 0.002), and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) versus no (HR 2.07; 95% CI 1.34-3.19; p = 0.001) were associated with worse prognosis. Subgroup analysis by pN showed no OS benefit for CLND in either pN1 (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.51-2.10; p = 0.922) or pN2+ (HR 1.31; 95% CI 0.67-2.57; p = 0.427) patients or in patients who received immunotherapy (HR 1.32; 95% CI 0.54-3.22; p = 0.549). CONCLUSIONS This study of SLNB + HN melanoma patients showed no OS difference in SLNB only versus SLNB + CLND. Further studies need to be performed to better define the role of CLND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan B Kesmodel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Joshua P Kronenfeld
- DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Wei Zhao
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Tulay Koru-Sengul
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Neha Goel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Daniel N Weingrad
- Division of Surgical Oncology, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Leonel Hernandez-Aya
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
- Division of Medical Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Jose Lutzky
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
- Division of Medical Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Lynn Feun
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
- Division of Medical Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Mary Garland-Kledzik
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Jessica S Crystal
- Division of Surgical Oncology, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Helvind NM, Brinch-Møller Weitemeyer M, Chakera AH, Hendel HW, Ellebæk E, Svane IM, Kjærskov MW, Bojesen S, Skyum H, Petersen SK, Bastholt L, Johansen C, Bidstrup PE, Hölmich LR. Stage-Specific Risk of Recurrence and Death From Melanoma in Denmark, 2008-2021: A National Observational Cohort Study of 25 720 Patients With Stage IA to IV Melanoma. JAMA Dermatol 2023; 159:1213-1222. [PMID: 37650576 PMCID: PMC10472263 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.3256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
Importance To ensure optimal treatment and surveillance of patients with melanoma, knowledge of the clinical stage-specific risk of recurrence, mortality, and recurrence patterns across the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition (AJCC8) substages is needed. Objective To estimate stage-specific recurrence and melanoma-specific mortality rates, assess absolute stage-specific risks of recurrence and mortality, and describe stage-specific recurrence patterns, including conditional rates. Design Retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected nationwide population-based registry data. Setting Nationwide, population-based cohort study. Participants The 25 720 Danish patients, 18 years or older, diagnosed with first-time stage IA to IV cutaneous melanoma between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2019, were included and followed up from time of primary treatment until December 31, 2021. Exposures First diagnosis of stage IA to IV cutaneous melanoma. Main Outcomes Stage-specific cumulative incidence of recurrence and melanoma-specific mortality, melanoma-specific recurrence-free survival, and assessed absolute stage-specific risks of recurrence and melanoma-specific mortality. Secondary outcomes were stage-specific recurrence patterns, including conditional rates, and melanoma-specific survival. Results We followed up 25 720 patients for a median of 5.9 years (95% CI, 58.9-59.3 years). Mean age was 59.1 years (95% CI, 58.9-59.3 years). Patients with stage IIB to IIC melanoma were older, had more comorbidities at diagnosis, and had the lowest rate of pathologic staging by sentinel node biopsy (81.6%-87.4%). A total of 10.6% of patients developed recurrence; first recurrence included distant recurrence, alone or with synchronous locoregional recurrence, in 56.6% of patients. We found a comparable risk of recurrence in stages IIIA and IIB (29.7% vs 33.2%) and in stages IIIB and IIC (35.9% vs 36.8%), respectively. Melanoma-specific mortality was comparable between stages IIIA and IIA (13.0% vs 13.6%) and between stages IIIB and IIB (18.4% vs 22.0%), respectively. These risk patterns persisted in cause-specific hazards models. Conclusions and Relevance This nationwide, population-based cohort study found that the increasing stages of the current AJCC8 staging system do not accurately reflect an increasing risk of recurrence and mortality in melanoma. The high proportion of distant recurrences suggests that hematogenous spread is a more common metastatic pathway than previously assumed, and surveillance with routine functional/cross-sectional imaging should be considered for stages IIB to IV. Future efforts should be put toward developing new tools for risk stratification and determining the survival effect of routine imaging in surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neel M. Helvind
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital: Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | | | - Annette H. Chakera
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital: Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Helle W. Hendel
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital: Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Eva Ellebæk
- National Center for Cancer Immune Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital: Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital: Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Inge Marie Svane
- National Center for Cancer Immune Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital: Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital: Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Mette W. Kjærskov
- Department of General and Plastic Surgery, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Sophie Bojesen
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Zealand University Hospital Roskilde, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Helle Skyum
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Lars Bastholt
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Christoffer Johansen
- Cancer Late Effect Research, Oncology Clinic, Center for Surgery and Cancer, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Pernille E. Bidstrup
- Psychological Aspects of Cancer, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lisbet R. Hölmich
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital: Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Cheng TW, Hartsough E, Giubellino A. Sentinel lymph node assessment in melanoma: current state and future directions. Histopathology 2023; 83:669-684. [PMID: 37526026 DOI: 10.1111/his.15011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
Assessment of sentinel lymph node status is an important step in the evaluation of patients with melanoma for both prognosis and therapeutic management. Pathologists have an important role in this evaluation. The methodologies have varied over time, from the evaluation of dimensions of metastatic burden to determination of the location of the tumour deposits within the lymph node to precise cell counting. However, no single method of sentinel lymph node tumour burden measurement can currently be used as a sole independent predictor of prognosis. The management approach to sentinel lymph node-positive patients has also evolved over time, with a more conservative approach recently recognised for selected cases. This review gives an overview of past and current status in the field with a glimpse into future directions based on prior experiences and clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany W Cheng
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Emily Hartsough
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Alessio Giubellino
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Gershenwald JE. Top Melanoma Articles from 2021 to Inform Your Cancer Practice. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:6325-6331. [PMID: 37493893 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13853-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
Advances in our understanding of melanoma biology and the role of immune checkpoint blockade and targeted therapy have ushered in a new and rapidly evolving era of multidisciplinary care for patients with melanoma. Based on efficacy for patients with metastatic melanoma, these systemic treatment approaches have been introduced into the adjuvant and, more recently, the neoadjuvant landscape. This report highlights the results of key clinical studies published or initially presented in 2021 that have informed our evidence-based approach to melanoma multidisciplinary care, primarily related to adjuvant and neoadjuvant approaches for patients with resectable or resected stage III or high-risk stage II melanoma and their impact on clinical care. Knowledge concerning these areas of active clinical investigation is critical for surgical oncologists who care for melanoma patients as the treatment landscape continues to evolve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1484, P.O. Box 301402, Houston, TX, 77230-1402, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Long GV, Swetter SM, Menzies AM, Gershenwald JE, Scolyer RA. Cutaneous melanoma. Lancet 2023:S0140-6736(23)00821-8. [PMID: 37499671 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)00821-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 116.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
Cutaneous melanoma is a malignancy arising from melanocytes of the skin. Incidence rates are rising, particularly in White populations. Cutaneous melanoma is typically driven by exposure to ultraviolet radiation from natural sunlight and indoor tanning, although there are several subtypes that are not related to ultraviolet radiation exposure. Primary melanomas are often darkly pigmented, but can be amelanotic, with diagnosis based on a combination of clinical and histopathological findings. Primary melanoma is treated with wide excision, with margins determined by tumour thickness. Further treatment depends on the disease stage (following histopathological examination and, where appropriate, sentinel lymph node biopsy) and can include surgery, checkpoint immunotherapy, targeted therapy, or radiotherapy. Systemic drug therapies are recommended as an adjunct to surgery in patients with resectable locoregional metastases and are the mainstay of treatment in advanced melanoma. Management of advanced melanoma is complex, particularly in those with cerebral metastasis. Multidisciplinary care is essential. Systemic drug therapies, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, have substantially increased melanoma survival following a series of landmark approvals from 2011 onward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Mater Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Susan M Swetter
- Department of Dermatology and Pigmented Lesion and Melanoma Program, Stanford University Medical Center and Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Dermatology, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Mater Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ma KL, Sharon CE, Tortorello GN, Perry NJ, Keele LJ, Lukens JN, Karakousis GC, Miura JT. Radiation, Lymph Node Dissection, or Both: Management of Lymph Node Micrometastases from Merkel Cell Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:4345-4355. [PMID: 37106277 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13437-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regional lymph node micrometastases from Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) can be treated with completion lymph node dissection (CLND) and/or radiation therapy (RT). It is unclear how these options compare in terms of survival benefits for patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS This retrospective cohort study used data from years 2012-2019 of the National Cancer Database. Patients with MCC and clinically negative, but pathologically positive, lymph node metastases who received RT to and/or CLND of the regional lymph node basin were included. Inverse probability weight balancing was performed using covariates followed by Cox proportional hazards modeling for survival analysis. RESULTS A total of 962 patients were included [median (interquartile range) age, 74 (67-80) years, 662 (68.8%) male patients, 926 (96.3%) white patients]. The majority (63%, n = 606) had a CLND only, while 18% (n = 173) had RT only, and 19% (n = 183) had both CLND and RT. From 2016 to 2019, usage of RT only increased from 10% to 31.8%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that treatment modality was not associated with survival [RT versus CLND, hazard ratio (HR) 0.842, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.621-1.142, p = 0.269, RT+CLND versus CLND, HR 1.029, 95% CI 0.775-1.367, p = 0.844]. This persisted after balancing weights (RT versus CLND, HR 0.837, 95% CI 0.614-1.142, p = 0.262, RT+CLND versus CLND, HR 1.085, 95% CI 0.801-1.470, p = 0.599). CONCLUSIONS The usage of RT for nodal micrometastasis in MCC is increasing as compared with CLND. This strategy appears to be safe, with no significant difference in survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin L Ma
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Cimarron E Sharon
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Gabriella N Tortorello
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Nikhita J Perry
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Luke J Keele
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - John N Lukens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Giorgos C Karakousis
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - John T Miura
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ishizuki S, Nakamura Y. Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Skin Cancer Based on Clinical Studies. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3291. [PMID: 37444401 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The sentinel lymph node is the first lymph node from the primary tumor. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a surgical procedure that can detect occult nodal metastasis with relatively low morbidity. It may also have a therapeutic effect via regional disease control. The Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy-I (MSLT-I) trial revealed a prognostic benefit from SLNB in melanoma patients. However, it remains unclear whether there is a prognostic benefit from SLNB in patients with nonmelanoma skin cancer owing to a lack of randomized prospective studies. Nevertheless, SLNB provides important information about nodal status, which is one of the strongest factors to predict prognosis and may guide additional nodal treatment. Currently, SLNB is widely used in the management of not only patients with melanoma but also those with nonmelanoma skin cancer. However, the utilization and outcomes of SLNB differ among skin cancers. In addition, SLNB is not recommended for routine use in all patients with skin cancer. In this review, we provide a summary of the role of SLNB and of the indications for SLNB in each skin cancer based on previously published articles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoichiro Ishizuki
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba 305-8575, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Nakamura
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba 305-8575, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Rosales JA, Palacios CA, Fernandez Trokhimtchouk T, Flores LF, Morillo Cox Á, Crespo Martinez JK, German M. Video-Assisted Endoscopic Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Acral Melanoma. Cureus 2023; 15:e40136. [PMID: 37425577 PMCID: PMC10329480 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.40136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
This article discusses acral melanoma, a rare subtype of melanoma often presented at the later stages of the disease and is, thus, associated with poor survival rates, especially in patients with a lower socioeconomic status. Surgical resection is the primary treatment option for localized acral melanoma, while amputation is often necessary for tumors on the digits or the midfoot. Lymphadenectomy may be necessary for patients with regional lymph node involvement; however, the therapeutic role of dissection remains controversial. Here, we present the case of a 68-year-old man with acral melanoma who underwent a Lisfranc amputation and endoscopic groin lymph node dissection for ganglionic metastasis. In Ecuador, this is the first reported case of endoscopic groin lymphadenectomy for regional lymph node metastasis secondary to acral melanoma. The discussion explores the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy and the completion of lymph node dissection in managing regional lymph nodes in melanoma patients. This case study aims to contribute to the growing knowledge on acral melanoma, assess the need for better patient care, and analyze the role of minimally invasive techniques for inguinal lymph node dissections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose A Rosales
- General Surgery, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador/Axxis Hospital, Quito, ECU
| | | | | | - Luis F Flores
- General Surgery, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador/Axxis Hospital, Quito, ECU
| | - Álvaro Morillo Cox
- General Surgery, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador/Axxis Hospital, Quito, ECU
| | | | - Melissa German
- Surgical Oncology, Hospital Carlos Andrade Marín, Quito, ECU
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ziętek M, Teterycz P, Wierzbicki J, Jankowski M, Las-Jankowska M, Zegarski W, Piekarski J, Nejc D, Drucis K, Cybulska-Stopa B, Łobaziewicz W, Galwas K, Kamińska-Winciorek G, Zdzienicki M, Sryukina T, Ziobro A, Kluz A, Czarnecka AM, Rutkowski P. The Current Treatment Trends and Survival Patterns in Melanoma Patients with Positive Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB): A Multicenter Nationwide Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2667. [PMID: 37345002 PMCID: PMC10216007 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15102667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In melanoma treatment, an approach following positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been recently deescalated from completion lymph node dissection (CLND) to active surveillance based on phase III trials data. In this study, we aim to evaluate treatment strategies in SLNB-positive melanoma patients in real-world practice. METHODS Five-hundred-fifty-seven melanoma SLNB-positive patients from seven comprehensive cancer centers treated between 2017 and 2021 were included. Kaplan-Meier methods and the Cox Proportional-Hazards Model were used for analysis. RESULTS The median follow-up was 25 months. Between 2017 and 2021, the percentage of patients undergoing CLND decreased (88-41%), while the use of adjuvant treatment increased (11-51%). The 3-year OS and RFS rates were 77.9% and 59.6%, respectively. Adjuvant therapy prolonged RFS (HR:0.69, p = 0.036)), but CLND did not (HR:1.22, p = 0.272). There were no statistically significant differences in OS for either adjuvant systemic treatment or CLND. Lower progression risk was also found, and time-dependent hazard ratios estimation in patients treated with systemic adjuvant therapy was confirmed (HR:0.20, p = 0.002 for BRAF inhibitors and HR:0.50, p = 0.015 for anti-PD-1 inhibitors). CONCLUSIONS Treatment of SLNB-positive melanoma patients is constantly evolving, and the role of surgery is currently rather limited. Whether CLND has been performed or not, in a group of SLNB-positive patients, adjuvant systemic treatment should be offered to all eligible patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcin Ziętek
- Department of Oncology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Lower Silesian Oncology, Pulmonology and Hematology Center, 53-413 Wroclaw, Poland;
| | - Paweł Teterycz
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland (M.Z.); (A.Z.); (A.M.C.); (P.R.)
- Department of Computational Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Jędrzej Wierzbicki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Lower Silesian Oncology, Pulmonology and Hematology Center, 53-413 Wroclaw, Poland;
- Laboratory of Immunopathology, Department of Experimental Therapy, Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology & Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, 53-114 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Michał Jankowski
- Chair of Surgical Oncology, Collegium Medicum Nicolaus Copernicus University, Oncology Center—Prof Franciszek Łukaszczyk Memorial Hospital, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland (W.Z.)
| | - Manuela Las-Jankowska
- Chair of Surgical Oncology, Collegium Medicum Nicolaus Copernicus University, Oncology Center—Prof Franciszek Łukaszczyk Memorial Hospital, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland (W.Z.)
| | - Wojciech Zegarski
- Chair of Surgical Oncology, Collegium Medicum Nicolaus Copernicus University, Oncology Center—Prof Franciszek Łukaszczyk Memorial Hospital, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland (W.Z.)
| | - Janusz Piekarski
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lodz, 90-419 Lodz, Poland; (J.P.); (D.N.)
| | - Dariusz Nejc
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lodz, 90-419 Lodz, Poland; (J.P.); (D.N.)
- Nicolaus Copernicus Multidisciplinary Center for Oncology and Traumatology, 93-513 Lodz, Poland
| | - Kamil Drucis
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gdansk Medical University, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland
| | - Bożena Cybulska-Stopa
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Cracow Branch, 31-115 Cracow, Poland;
| | - Wojciech Łobaziewicz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Cracow Branch, 31-115 Cracow, Poland;
| | - Katarzyna Galwas
- 2nd Department of Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, 44-102 Gliwice, Poland
| | - Grażyna Kamińska-Winciorek
- Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Onco-Hematology, Skin Cancer and Melanoma Team, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, 44-102 Gliwice, Poland;
| | - Marcin Zdzienicki
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland (M.Z.); (A.Z.); (A.M.C.); (P.R.)
| | - Tatsiana Sryukina
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland (M.Z.); (A.Z.); (A.M.C.); (P.R.)
- Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Anna Ziobro
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland (M.Z.); (A.Z.); (A.M.C.); (P.R.)
- Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Kluz
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland (M.Z.); (A.Z.); (A.M.C.); (P.R.)
- Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Anna M. Czarnecka
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland (M.Z.); (A.Z.); (A.M.C.); (P.R.)
- Department of Experimental Pharmacology, Mossakowski Medical Research Centers, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland (M.Z.); (A.Z.); (A.M.C.); (P.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Broman KK, Hughes TM, Bredbeck BC, Sun J, Kirichenko D, Carr MJ, Sharma A, Bartlett EK, Nijhuis AAG, Thompson JF, Hieken TJ, Kottschade L, Downs J, Gyorki DE, Stahlie E, van Akkooi A, Ollila DW, O'shea K, Song Y, Karakousis G, Moncrieff M, Nobes J, Vetto J, Han D, Hotz M, Farma JM, Deneve JL, Fleming MD, Perez M, Baecher K, Lowe M, Bagge RO, Mattsson J, Lee AY, Berman RS, Chai H, Kroon HM, Teras J, Teras RM, Farrow NE, Beasley GM, Hui JYC, Been L, Kruijff S, Sinco B, Sarnaik AA, Sondak VK, Zager JS, Dossett LA. International Center-Level Variation in Utilization of Completion Lymph Node Dissection and Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Sentinel Lymph Node-Positive Melanoma at Major Referral Centers. Ann Surg 2023; 277:e1106-e1115. [PMID: 35129464 PMCID: PMC10097464 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine overall trends and center-level variation in utilization of completion lymph node dissection (CLND) and adjuvant systemic therapy for sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive melanoma. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Based on recent clinical trials, management options for SLN-positive melanoma now include effective adjuvant systemic therapy and nodal observation instead of CLND. It is unknown how these findings have shaped practice or how these contemporaneous developments have influenced their respective utilization. METHODS We performed an international cohort study at 21 melanoma referral centers in Australia, Europe, and the United States that treated adults with SLN-positive melanoma and negative distant staging from July 2017 to June 2019. We used generalized linear and multinomial logistic regression models with random intercepts for each center to assess center-level variation in CLND and adjuvant systemic treatment, adjusting for patient and disease-specific characteristics. RESULTS Among 1109 patients, performance of CLND decreased from 28% to 8% and adjuvant systemic therapy use increased from 29 to 60%. For both CLND and adjuvant systemic treatment, the most influential factors were nodal tumor size, stage, and location of treating center. There was notable variation among treating centers in management of stage IIIA patients and use of CLND with adjuvant systemic therapy versus nodal observation alone for similar risk patients. CONCLUSIONS There has been an overall decline in CLND and simultaneous adoption of adjuvant systemic therapy for patients with SLN-positive melanoma though wide variation in practice remains. Accounting for differences in patient mix, location of care contributed significantly to the observed variation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristy K Broman
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Amanda A G Nijhuis
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | - Emma Stahlie
- Netherlands Cancer institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Yun Song
- University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | - Marc Moncrieff
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | - Jenny Nobes
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | - John Vetto
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Dale Han
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jan Mattsson
- University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Harvey Chai
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Hidde M Kroon
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Juri Teras
- North Estonia Medical Centre Foundation, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Roland M Teras
- North Estonia Medical Centre Foundation, Tallinn, Estonia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Amod A Sarnaik
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL
| | - Vernon K Sondak
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL
| | - Jonathan S Zager
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ospina Serrano AV, Contreras F, Triana I, Sánchez-Vanegas G, Ortíz JD, Ramos P, Vargas C, Arango N, Idrobo H, Munévar I, Yepes A, Mantilla W, Jiménez P, Rivas G, Lema M, Alcalá C, Gómez D, Chinchia M, Barrero A. Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Patients With Early Malignant Melanoma in One Latin American Country: Results of the Epidemiological Registry of Malignant Melanoma in Colombia Study. JCO Glob Oncol 2023; 9:e2200377. [PMID: 37216624 PMCID: PMC10497268 DOI: 10.1200/go.22.00377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
To describe the population with early malignant melanoma, we performed a cohort study on the basis of the Epidemiological Registry of Malignant Melanoma in Colombia-Asociacion Colombiana de Hematologia y Oncologia. From January 2011 until December 2021, 759 patients were included; the average age was 66 years, 57% were women, acral lentiginous histology was found in 27.8% of patients, and the median follow-up was 36.5 months. The prognostic factors for overall survival in our population are Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 3-4 (hazard ratio [HR], 13.8), stage III (HR, 5.07), received radiotherapy (HR, 3.38), ulceration on histology (HR, 2.68), chronic sun exposure (HR, 2.3), low income (HR, 2.04), previous local surgery (HR, 0.27), and have received adjuvant treatment (HR, 0.41).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aylen Vanessa Ospina Serrano
- Asociación Colombiana de Hematología y Oncología—ACHO, ICCAL Hospital, Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Fernando Contreras
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología INC, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Iván Triana
- Asociación Colombiana de Hematología y Oncología—ACHO, ICCAL Hospital, Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | | | - Pedro Ramos
- Clínica Universitaria Colombia Sanitas, Oncocare, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | | | - Henry Idrobo
- Centro Médico Julián Coronel, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia
| | - Isabel Munévar
- Hospital Militar Central, Fundación Cardio infantil, Hemato Oncólogos Asociados, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Andrés Yepes
- Hospital Universitario San Vicente Fundación, Medellín, Colombia
| | - William Mantilla
- Fundación Cardio infantil, Universidad del Rosario, Grupo ICAROS, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Paola Jiménez
- Hemato Oncólogos Asociados, Los Cobos Medical Center, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | | | | | - Diego Gómez
- Fundación cardiovascular de Colombia, Hospital Internacional de Colombia, Bucaramanga, Colombia
| | | | - Angela Barrero
- Asociación Colombiana de Hematología y Oncología—ACHO, Bogota, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Pasha T, Arain Z, Buscombe J, Aloj L, Durrani A, Patel A, Roshan A. Association of Complex Lymphatic Drainage in Head and Neck Cutaneous Melanoma With Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Outcomes: A Cohort Study and Literature Review. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 149:416-423. [PMID: 36892824 PMCID: PMC9999281 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.0076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023]
Abstract
Importance Although sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a vital staging tool, its application in head and neck melanoma (HNM) is complicated by a higher false-negative rate (FNR) compared with other regions. This may be due to the complex lymphatic drainage in the head and neck. Objective To compare the accuracy, prognostic value, and long-term outcomes of SLNB in HNM with melanoma from the trunk and limb, focusing on the lymphatic drainage pattern. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort observational study at a single UK University cancer center included all patients with primary cutaneous melanoma undergoing SLNB between 2010 to 2020. Data analysis was conducted during December 2022. Exposures Primary cutaneous melanoma undergoing SLNB between 2010 to 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures This cohort study compared the FNR (defined as the ratio between false-negative results and the sum of false-negative and true-positive results) and false omission rate (defined as the ratio between false-negative results and the sum of false-negative and true-negative results) for SLNB stratified by 3 body regions (HNM, limb, and trunk). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare recurrence-free survival (RFS) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS). Comparative analysis of detected lymph nodes on lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) and SLNB was performed by quantifying lymphatic drainage patterns by number of nodes and lymph node basins. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression identified independent risk factors. Results Overall, 1080 patients were included (552 [51.1%] men, 528 [48.9%] women; median age at diagnosis 59.8 years), with a median (IQR) follow-up 4.8 (IQR, 2.7-7.2) years. Head and neck melanoma had a higher median age at diagnosis (66.2 years) and higher Breslow thickness (2.2 mm). The FNR was highest in HNM (34.5% vs 14.8% trunk or 10.4% limb, respectively). Similarly, the false omission rate was 7.8% in HNM compared with 5.7% trunk or 3.0% limbs. The MSS was no different (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.43-1.53), but RFS was lower in HNM (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.36-0.85). On LSG, patients with HNM had the highest proportion of multiple hotspots (28.6% with ≥3 hotspots vs 23.2% trunk and 7.2% limbs). The RFS was lower for patients with HNM with 3 or more affected lymph nodes found on LSG than those with fewer than 3 affected lymph nodes (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.18-0.77). Cox regression analysis showed head and neck location to be an independent risk factor for RFS (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.01-2.50), but not for MSS (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.35-1.71). Conclusions and Relevance This cohort study found higher rates of complex lymphatic drainage, FNR, and regional recurrence in HNM compared with other body sites on long-term follow-up. We advocate considering surveillance imaging for HNM for high-risk melanomas irrespective of sentinel lymph node status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terouz Pasha
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Zohaib Arain
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - John Buscombe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Luigi Aloj
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Amer Durrani
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Animesh Patel
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Amit Roshan
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ascierto PA, Blank C, Eggermont AM, Garbe C, Gershenwald JE, Hamid O, Hauschild A, Luke JJ, Mehnert JM, Sosman JA, Tawbi HA, Mandalà M, Testori A, Caracò C, Osman I, Puzanov I. The "Great Debate" at Melanoma Bridge 2022, Naples, December 1st-3rd, 2022. J Transl Med 2023; 21:265. [PMID: 37072748 PMCID: PMC10114457 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04100-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023] Open
Abstract
The Great Debate session at the 2022 Melanoma Bridge congress (December 1-3) featured counterpoint views from leading experts on five contemporary topics of debate in the management of melanoma. The debates considered the choice of anti-lymphocyte-activation gene (LAG)-3 therapy or ipilimumab in combination with anti-programmed death (PD)-1 therapy, whether anti-PD-1 monotherapy is still acceptable as a comparator arm in clinical trials, whether adjuvant treatment of melanoma is still a useful treatment option, the role of adjuvant therapy in stage II melanoma, what role surgery will continue to have in the treatment of melanoma. As is customary in the Melanoma Bridge Great Debates, the speakers are invited by the meeting Chairs to express one side of the assigned debate and the opinions given may not fully reflect personal views. Audiences voted in favour of either side of the argument both before and after each debate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo A Ascierto
- Department of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapy, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.
| | | | - Alexander M Eggermont
- University Medical Center Utrecht & Princess Maxima Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Comprehensive Cancer Center München, Technical University München & Ludwig Maximiliaan University, München, Germany
| | - Claus Garbe
- Center for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Omid Hamid
- The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, A Cedars-Sinai Affiliate, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Axel Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Jason J Luke
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Janice M Mehnert
- Perlmutter Cancer Center of NYU Langone/NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Sosman
- Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Hussein A Tawbi
- MD Anderson Brain Metastasis Clinic UT, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Alessandro Testori
- Image regenerative clinic Milan, Italy; EORTC Melanoma Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Corrado Caracò
- Division of Surgery of Melanoma and Skin Cancer, Istituto Nazionale Tumori "Fondazione Pascale" IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Iman Osman
- Rudolf L. Baer, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Igor Puzanov
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Pérez-Morales J, Broman KK, Bettampadi D, Haver MK, Zager JS, Schabath MB. Recurrence Patterns for Regionally Metastatic Melanoma Treated in the Era of Adjuvant Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:2364-2374. [PMID: 36479663 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12866-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the timing and patterns of recurrence for patients with regionally metastatic melanoma on the basis of nodal management and receipt of adjuvant therapy. METHODS We identified randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies published between 2010 and 2020 that reported timing and/or patterns of recurrence. We evaluated recurrence-free survival (RFS), location of recurrence, and surveillance strategy on the basis of receipt of adjuvant systemic therapy and nodal management with observation versus completion dissection. We compared differences in patterns of recurrence across studies using RevMan. RFS was evaluated graphically using point estimates and confidence intervals. RESULTS Among the 19 publications, there was wide variation in study populations, imaging surveillance regimens, and format of recurrence reporting. Patterns of disease recurrence did not differ between adjuvant and placebo/observation groups. A total of 11 studies reported RFS at variable time intervals, which ranged in adjuvant therapy groups (38-88% at 1 year, 29-67% at 2 years, 33-58% at 3 years, and 34-53% at 5 years) and placebo/observation groups (47-63% at 1 year, 39-47% at 2 years, 33-68% at 3 years, and 57% at 5 years). Anti-PD-1 immune therapy and BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy were superior to placebo at year 1. DISCUSSION We found that adjuvant treatment improved RFS but did not alter the patterns of disease recurrence compared with patients managed without adjuvant systemic treatment. Future studies should separately report sites of disease recurrence on the basis of specific adjuvant systemic treatment and surveillance practices to better advise patients about their patterns and risk of recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaileene Pérez-Morales
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
| | - Kristy K Broman
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Deepti Bettampadi
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Mary Katherine Haver
- Moffitt Biomedical Library, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jonathan S Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Matthew B Schabath
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Helvind NM, Weitemeyer MBM, Chakera AH, Hendel HW, Ellebæk E, Svane IM, Kjærskov MW, Bojesen S, Skyum H, Petersen SK, Bastholt L, Johansen C, Bidstrup PE, Hölmich LR. Earlier Recurrence Detection Using Routine FDG PET-CT Scans in Surveillance of Stage IIB to IIID Melanoma: A National Cohort Study of 1480 Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:2377-2388. [PMID: 36752970 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-13034-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of routine imaging in melanoma surveillance is unknown. In 2016, Denmark was the first country in the world to implement routine imaging with positron emission tomography-computed tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG PET-CT) in a nationwide, population-based surveillance program. This study aimed to determine the impact of surveillance with routine FDG PET-CT on hazard, cumulative incidence, and absolute risk of overall, locoregional, and distant recurrence detection in patients with stage IIB to IIID cutaneous melanoma. METHODS This retrospective, population-based, nationwide cohort study used prospectively collected data from five national health registries to compare hazard, cumulative incidence, and absolute risk of recurrence in patients with cutaneous melanoma diagnosed in 2008-2010 (cohort 1, followed with clinical examinations) and patients with cutaneous melanoma diagnosed in 2016-2017 (cohort 2, followed with clinical examinations and routine FDG PET-CT at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months). RESULTS The study included 1480 patients with stage IIB to IIID cutaneous melanoma. Cumulative incidences of overall and distant recurrence were higher in cohort 2, with a peak difference at three years (32.3 % vs 27.5 % and 25.8 % vs. 18.5 %, respectively). The hazard of recurrence was higher in cohort 2 during the first two years, with hazard rates for overall and distant recurrence of 1.16 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.93-1.44) and 1.51 (95 % CI, 1.16-1.96), respectively. The patterns persisted in absolute risk estimates. CONCLUSIONS Patients with stage IIB to IIID melanoma followed with routine FDG PET-CT had a 51 % increased hazard of distant recurrence detection within the first two years of surveillance. Future studies must determine whether this earlier recurrence detection translates into improved survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neel Maria Helvind
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital: Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
| | | | - Annette Hougaard Chakera
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital: Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Helle Westergren Hendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital: Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Eva Ellebæk
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital: Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Inge Marie Svane
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital: Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | | | - Sophie Bojesen
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Helle Skyum
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Lars Bastholt
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Christoffer Johansen
- CASTLE-Cancer Late Effect Research, Center for Surgery and Cancer, Oncology Clinic, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ito T, Hashimoto H, Kaku-Ito Y, Tanaka Y, Nakahara T. Nail Apparatus Melanoma: Current Management and Future Perspectives. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12062203. [PMID: 36983205 PMCID: PMC10057171 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12062203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Nail apparatus melanoma (NAM) is a rare type of cutaneous melanoma that belongs to the acral melanoma subtype. NAM is managed principally in accordance with the general treatment for cutaneous melanoma, but there is scarce evidence in support of this in the literature. Acral melanoma is genetically different from non-acral cutaneous melanoma, while recently accumulated data suggest that NAM also has a different genetic background from acral melanoma. In this review, we focus on recent advances in the management of NAM. Localized NAM should be surgically removed; amputation of the digit and digit-preserving surgery have been reported. Sentinel lymph node biopsy can be considered for invasive NAM for the purpose of accurate staging. However, it is yet to be clarified whether patients with metastatic sentinel lymph nodes can be safely spared completion lymph node dissection. Similar to cutaneous melanoma, immune checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF/MEK inhibitors are used as the first-line treatment for metastatic NAM, but data on the efficacy of these therapies remain scarce. The therapeutic effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors could be lower for NAM than for cutaneous melanoma. This review highlights the urgent need to accumulate data to better define the optimal management of this rare melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takamichi Ito
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +81-92-642-5585; Fax: +81-92-642-5600
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
van Akkooi ACJ, Schadendorf D, Eggermont AMM. Alternatives and reduced need for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) staging for melanoma. Eur J Cancer 2023; 182:163-169. [PMID: 36681612 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.12.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been introduced in the 1990s to identify patients who might benefit from completion lymph node dissection. Neither SLNB nor CLND improved survival, but SLNB staging did provide the best staging, above Breslow thickness and ulceration. The SLN status and SLN tumour burden were used in all trials until date looking at modern adjuvant systemic therapy with immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) or targeted therapies (TT). Adjuvant ICI and TT are shifting towards stage II melanoma. The question is whether there is still role for SLNB in melanoma, in this day and age, and if so, how does the future look for SLNB staging? The SLN status and SLN tumour burden might be useful for a consultation to discuss the number needed to treat in a risk/benefit discussion. For stage IIB/C patients, it seems likely, however, that patients will forego a nuclear scan followed by the risk of surgical intervention and morbidity associated with SLNB if they opt to receive adjuvant therapy regardless of the SLNB result. For stage I/IIA, it is still required to detect high-risk patients who might benefit from adjuvant therapy. However, biomarkers are emerging, such as gene expression profilers (GEP), immunohistological signatures and liquid biopsies with ctDNA. There still is a role for SLNB staging in melanoma today, but we expect that the availability of therapeutic option independent of SLNB status as well as emergence of validated biomarkers to predict risk will reduce the need for SLNB staging in the upcoming decade to the point it will no longer be used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander C J van Akkooi
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; German Cancer DKTK Consortium, Partner Site, Germany; Research Center One Health Ruhr, Research Alliance Ruhr, University Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Alexander M M Eggermont
- Comprehensive Cancer Center München, Technical University München & Ludwig Maximiliaan University, München, Germany; University Medical Center Utrecht & Princess Maxima Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Traditional risk factors and nodal yield-still relevant with high-quality risk-adapted adjuvant treatment for locally advanced head and neck cancer? Strahlenther Onkol 2023; 199:284-292. [PMID: 36350358 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-02017-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) often undergo multimodal therapy including radical resection of the primary tumor and neck dissection (ND) followed by risk-adapted adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy (R(C)T). Quality parameters influencing local control and survival of these patients have been postulated: resection status (R status), extranodal extension (ENE), interval to adjuvant treatment ≤6 weeks, R(C)T given when indicated, and nodal yield (NY) ≥18 lymph nodes per neck. For other solid tumors the trend is towards less extensive lymph node surgery to avoid toxicity such as lymphedema, damage to peripheral nerves, dysesthesia, or paresthesia. The present study aims to investigate whether the number of nodes removed during neck dissection for LAHNC is still predictive for outcome when patients receive risk-adapted adjuvant treatment according to current guidelines. METHODS Between 2008 and 2015, 468 patients with LAHNC undergoing R(C)T with curative intent were prospectively registered in a database (UICC III/IV). Among them, 359 patients received adjuvant treatment and 295 underwent neck dissection. There were 119 (40%) patients with an oropharyngeal primary, 49 (17%) with cancer of the larynx/hypopharynx, 88 (30%) of the oral cavity, and 39 (13%) of the nasal/paranasal sinuses and cancer of unknown primary (CUP). Median follow-up was 45.6 months. Histopathology revealed an R1 status in 65 (22%) cases and ENE in 93 (31%) cases. 150 (51%) patients received RCT; the median time to adjuvant treatment from the day of tumor resection was 44 days (35-54) and overall treatment time (OTT; time from surgery to the last day of R(C)T) was 90 days (82-101). Factors influencing disease-free survival (DFS) were adjusted and analyzed using CART analysis (removed nodes, number of positive nodes, body mass index (BMI), ENE, T and N classification, R status, and primary site). Local control (LC), distant metastases-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier statistics and multivariate analysis (MVA) for factors predictive for DFS and OS. RESULTS CART analysis (Classification and Regression Trees) showed that T classification (T3/4) is the most important predictor for DFS, followed by age (> 61 years) and BMI (< 17.4). Primary site (OPC vs. other) and number of removed nodes (< 17) were shown to be less important for DFS, while ECE, N classification, and R status seem to be of little relevance. MVA revealed number of positive nodes, non-OPC, and T3/4 to be negative predictive factors for DFS. For OS, the number of positive nodes and non-OPC primary were predictive. Five-year rates were 86.1% for LC, 87.9% DMFS, 76.5% DFS, and 67.2% for OS. CONCLUSION In this patient cohort, the number of removed nodes is not relevant for DFS and OS, while the number of positive nodes and T classification have a negative impact on these endpoints. The high-risk factors positive resection margin and ECE seem to lose their negative impact on DFS and OS. High-quality care in head and oncology is only possible within a close multidisciplinary team and network.
Collapse
|
41
|
Leonard LD, Beaty L, Thomas M, Quinn C, Colborn KL, de Araujo TB, Torphy RJ, Assumpção LR, Olino K, Studts CR, Rodriguez Franco S, McCarter M, Stewart C, Gleisner AL. Unmeasured factors are associated with the use of completion lymph node dissection (CLND) in melanoma. J Surg Oncol 2023; 127:716-726. [PMID: 36453464 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Revised: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Completion lymph node dissection (CLND) was the standard treatment for patients with melanoma with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) until 2017 when data from the DeCOG-SLT and MLST-2 randomized trials challenged the survival benefit of this procedure. We assessed the contribution of patient, tumor and facility factors on the use of CLND in patients with surgically resected Stage III melanoma. METHODS Using the National Cancer Database, patients who underwent surgical excision and were found to have a positive SLN from 2012 to 2017 were included. A multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression model with a random intercept for the facility was used to determine the effect of patient, tumor, and facility variables on the risk of CLND. Reference effect measures (REMs) were used to compare the contribution of contextual effects (unknown facility variables) versus measured variables on the variation in CLND use. RESULTS From 2012 to 2017, the overall use of CLND decreased from 59.9% to 26.5% (p < 0.0001). Overall, older patients and patients with government-based insurance were less likely to undergo CLND. Tumor factors associated with a decreased rate of CLND included primary tumor location on the lower limb, decreasing depth, and mitotic rate <1. However, the contribution of contextual effects to the variation in CLND use exceeded that of the measured facility, tumor, time, and patient variables. CONCLUSIONS There was a decrease in CLND use during the study period. However, there is still high variability in CLND use, mainly driven by unmeasured contextual effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura D Leonard
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Laurel Beaty
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Madeline Thomas
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Christopher Quinn
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Kathryn L Colborn
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Thiago B de Araujo
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Robert J Torphy
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Lia R Assumpção
- Department of Surgery, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Kelly Olino
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Christina R Studts
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Salvador Rodriguez Franco
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,The Heart Institute, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Martin McCarter
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Camille Stewart
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Ana L Gleisner
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Current Controversies in Melanoma Treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 151:495e-505e. [PMID: 36821575 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000009936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
LEARNING OBJECTIVES After reading this article and viewing the videos, the participant should be able to: 1. Discuss margins for in situ and invasive disease and describe reconstructive options for wide excision defects, including the keystone flap. 2. Describe a digit-sparing alternative for subungual melanoma. 3. Calculate personalized risk estimates for sentinel node biopsy using predictive nomograms. 4. Describe the indications for lymphadenectomy and describe a technique intended to reduce the risk of lymphedema following lymphadenectomy. 5. Offer options for in-transit melanoma management. SUMMARY Melanoma management continues to evolve, and plastic surgeons need to stay at the forefront of advances and controversies. Appropriate margins for in situ and invasive disease require consideration of the trials on which they are based. A workhorse reconstruction option for wide excision defects, particularly in extremities, is the keystone flap. There are alternative surgical approaches to subungual tumors besides amputation. It is now possible to personalize a risk estimate for sentinel node positivity beyond what is available for groups of patients with a given stage of disease. Sentinel node biopsy can be made more accurate and less morbid with novel adjuncts. Positive sentinel node biopsies are now rarely managed with completion lymphadenectomy. Should a patient require lymphadenectomy, immediate lymphatic reconstruction may mitigate the lymphedema risk. Finally, there are minimally invasive modalities for effective control of in-transit recurrences.
Collapse
|
43
|
Allard-Coutu A, Dobson V, Schmitz E, Shah H, Nessim C. The Evolution of the Sentinel Node Biopsy in Melanoma. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:life13020489. [PMID: 36836846 PMCID: PMC9966203 DOI: 10.3390/life13020489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The growing repertoire of approved immune-checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy has revolutionized the adjuvant treatment of melanoma. While the treatment of primary cutaneous melanoma remains wide local excision (WLE), the management of regional lymph nodes continues to evolve in light of practice-changing clinical trials and dramatically improved adjuvant therapy. With large multicenter studies reporting no benefit in overall survival for completion lymph node dissection (CLND) after a positive sentinel node biopsy (SLNB), controversy remains regarding patient selection and clinical decision-making. This review explores the evolution of the SLNB in cutaneous melanoma in the context of a rapidly changing adjuvant treatment landscape, summarizing the key clinical trials which shaped current practice guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Allard-Coutu
- Department of General Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
- Correspondence:
| | | | - Erika Schmitz
- Department of General Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
| | - Hely Shah
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
| | - Carolyn Nessim
- Department of General Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Mott NM, Duncan ZN, Pesavento CM, Vastardis AF, Bredbeck BC, Harter CA, Dossett LA, Broman KK, Hughes TM. Implementation of melanoma guidelines in the multidisciplinary setting: A qualitative analysis. Am J Surg 2023; 225:335-340. [PMID: 36180302 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.09.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Revised: 09/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data suggest variation in utilization of completion lymph node dissection (CLND) and adjuvant systemic therapy (AT) for sentinel lymph node-positive melanoma. We aimed to explore how clinicians consider multidisciplinary treatment options. METHODS We conducted semi-structured interviews of surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, and otolaryngologists to produce a thematic analysis. RESULTS Participants (n = 26) described melanoma care as inherently "multidisciplinary," noting the importance of conversations facilitated by shared clinic days or space. Despite believing that their practice mirrored other clinicians, participants revealed diverging perspectives on CLND and AT. Multidisciplinary care presented challenges for surveillance as surgeons expressed desire to retain ownership of patients but did not feel comfortable overseeing AT needs. Participants questioned the fidelity of nodal ultrasounds, noted redundancy in their roles, and described a "surveillance burden" for patients. CONCLUSION Opportunities exist to improve multidisciplinary melanoma care through broader consensus of how to translate emerging data into patient care and delineating surveillance roles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole M Mott
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; University of Michigan, Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Surgery, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Zoey N Duncan
- The University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | | | - Brooke C Bredbeck
- University of Michigan, Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; University of Michigan, Department of Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Lesly A Dossett
- University of Michigan, Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; University of Michigan, Department of Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Kristy K Broman
- The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Tasha M Hughes
- University of Michigan, Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; University of Michigan, Department of Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Parvez E, Khosrow-Khavar F, Dumitra T, Nessim C, Bernard-Bédard É, Rivard J, Pravong V, Wang S, Gervais MK, Meterissian S, Dumitra S. Multicenter Adoption and Outcomes of Nodal Observation for Patients with Melanoma and Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:1195-1205. [PMID: 36282456 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12695-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Following publication of the MSLT-II trial showing no survival benefit of completion lymphadenectomy (CLND) in patients with melanoma sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases, it is expected that practice patterns have changed. The purpose of this study is to understand real-world practices and outcomes after publication of this landmark trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with truncal/extremity melanoma SLN metastases diagnosed between 2013 and 2019 at four academic cancer centers were included in this retrospective cohort study. Descriptive statistics, Cox proportional hazards model, and multivariable regression were used to characterize the cohort and identify predictors of CLND, harboring non-SLN (NSLN) metastases, and survival. RESULTS Results of 1176 patients undergoing SLN biopsy, 183 had SLN metastases. The number of patients who underwent CLND before versus after trial publication was 75.7.% versus 20.5% (HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.09-0.28). Of those undergoing nodal observation (NO), 92% had a first nodal-basin ultrasound, while 63% of patients had a fourth. In exploratory multivariable analyses, age ≥ 50 years was associated with lower rate of CLND (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.36-0.92) and larger SLN deposit (> 1.0 mm) with increased rate of CLND (HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.17-3.00) in the complete cohort. Extracapsular extension was associated with increased risk of NSLN metastases (HR 12.43, 95% CI 2.48-62.31). Adjusted survival analysis demonstrated no difference in recurrence or mortality between patients treated with CLND versus NO at median 2.2-year follow-up. CONCLUSION Nodal observation was rapidly adopted into practice in patients with melanoma SLN metastases at four centers in Canada. Younger age and higher nodal burden were associated with increased use of CLND after trial publication. Ultrasound (US) surveillance decreased with time from SLNB. In our study, CLND was not associated with a decreased risk of recurrence or mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Parvez
- Department of Surgery, Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Center, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| | | | - Teodora Dumitra
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Carolyn Nessim
- Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Justin Rivard
- Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Vera Pravong
- Department of Surgery, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sara Wang
- Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Mai-Kim Gervais
- Department of Surgery, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
C-Reactive Protein and Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio Predict Recurrence in Stage III Melanoma Patients with Microscopic Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030702. [PMID: 36765660 PMCID: PMC9913855 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Although adjuvant therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and BRAF/MEK inhibitors improve recurrence-free survival (RFS) in stage III melanoma patients significantly, prognostic factors are needed to identify patients with a high risk of disease recurrence. Therefore, the aim of our study was to investigate the prognostic potential of routinely collected blood parameters for stage III melanoma patients with microscopic sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis. Altogether, we retrospectively analyzed 138 stage III melanoma patients who were diagnosed with microscopic SLN metastasis at the skin cancer center of the University Hospital Cologne between 2011 and 2020 and who did not receive prior adjuvant therapy with ICI or BRAF/MEK-inhibitors. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed to assess the impact of preoperatively collected blood parameters and blood ratios on recurrence-free survival (RFS; primary endpoint) and overall survival (OS). A high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), low lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) and high C-reactive protein (CRP) value were significantly associated with shorter RFS in multivariate analysis. For LMR (cut-off 3.5) and for CRP (cut-off 3.0) this effect remained after dichotomization. CRP showed a stronger association with RFS than NLR or LMR, with the highest association being detected for the combination of low LMR and high CRP. Additionally, derived NLR ≥ 2.0 was significantly associated with shorter OS in multivariate analysis. In summary, our data suggest that CRP in combination with LMR should be considered as a marker for melanoma recurrence in stage III melanoma patients with microscopic SLN metastasis.
Collapse
|
47
|
Dogaru IM, Bahaa-Eddin W, Oproiu AM. Melanoma: A Historical Walk-through from Palliative Treatment to Modern-day Practice. ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF MILITARY MEDICINE 2023. [DOI: 10.55453/rjmm.2023.126.3.5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/05/2023]
Abstract
"Melanoma is one of the most common types of malignancy in the world, and one known to carry a very poor prognosis until recent years. This review aims to outline the events in the history of the disease and the impact made by the discoveries along the way, as well as the modern-day consensus by referencing the updated literature regarding the present approach and future directions. In the last two decades, several studies and research have brought significant improvement in the diagnosis and clinical management of melanomas. The development of sentinel lymph node biopsy has brought major changes to the surgical approach to the disease, and modern therapies based on recently developed knowledge changed the death sentence this diagnosis once meant to a manageable condition despite its aggressiveness, keeping in mind that early diagnosis and safe margin excision remain the best and most optimistic course of treatment. "
Collapse
|
48
|
Blankenstein SA, Bonenkamp JJ, Aarts MJB, van den Berkmortel FWPJ, Blank CU, Blokx WAM, Boers-Sonderen MJ, van den Eertwegh AJM, Franken MG, de Groot JWB, Haanen JBAG, Hospers GAP, Kapiteijn EW, van Not OJ, Piersma D, van Rijn RS, Suijkerbuijk KPM, van der Veldt AAM, Vreugdenhil G, Westgeest HM, Wouters MWJM, van Akkooi ACJ. Is a History of Optimal Staging by Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in the Era Prior to Adjuvant Therapy Associated with Improved Outcome Once Melanoma Patients have Progressed to Advanced Disease? Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:573-586. [PMID: 36203067 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12600-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is important for staging in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma. Did having previously undergone SLNB also affect outcomes in patients once they have progressed to metastatic melanoma in the era prior to adjuvant therapy? METHODS Data were retrieved from the Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry, a prospectively collected, nationwide database of patients with unresectable stage IIIC or IV (advanced) melanoma between 2012 and 2018. Melanoma-specific survival (MSS) was compared between patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma, previously treated with a wide local excision (WLE) or WLE combined with SLNB as initial treatment of their primary tumor. Cox regression analyses were used to analyze the influence of different variables on MSS. RESULTS In total, 2581 patients were included, of whom 1412 were treated with a WLE of the primary tumor alone and 1169 in whom this was combined with SLNB. At a median follow-up of 44 months from diagnosis of advanced melanoma, MSS was significantly longer in patients who had previously undergone SLNB {median 23 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 19-29) vs. 18 months (95% CI 15-20) for patients treated with WLE alone; p = 0.002}. However, multivariate Cox regression did not identify SLNB as an independent favorable prognostic factor for MSS after diagnosis of advanced melanoma. CONCLUSION Prior to the availability of adjuvant systemic therapy, once patients have unresectable stage IIIC or IV (advanced) melanoma, there was no difference in disease outcome for patients who were or were not previously staged with SLNB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A Blankenstein
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Johannes J Bonenkamp
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maureen J B Aarts
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Christian U Blank
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willeke A M Blokx
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marye J Boers-Sonderen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Alfons J M van den Eertwegh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VU University Medical Center (VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet G Franken
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - John B A G Haanen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geke A P Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen W Kapiteijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier J van Not
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Djura Piersma
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Rozemarijn S van Rijn
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Astrid A M van der Veldt
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerard Vreugdenhil
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Hans M Westgeest
- Department of Internal Medicine, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Michel W J M Wouters
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander C J van Akkooi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Diagnostic and Prognostic Deep Learning Applications for Histological Assessment of Cutaneous Melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14246231. [PMID: 36551716 PMCID: PMC9776963 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14246231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Melanoma is among the most devastating human malignancies. Accurate diagnosis and prognosis are essential to offer optimal treatment. Histopathology is the gold standard for establishing melanoma diagnosis and prognostic features. However, discrepancies often exist between pathologists, and analysis is costly and time-consuming. Deep-learning algorithms are deployed to improve melanoma diagnosis and prognostication from histological images of melanoma. In recent years, the development of these machine-learning tools has accelerated, and machine learning is poised to become a clinical tool to aid melanoma histology. Nevertheless, a review of the advances in machine learning in melanoma histology was lacking. We performed a comprehensive literature search to provide a complete overview of the recent advances in machine learning in the assessment of melanoma based on hematoxylin eosin digital pathology images. In our work, we review 37 recent publications, compare the methods and performance of the reviewed studies, and highlight the variety of promising machine-learning applications in melanoma histology.
Collapse
|
50
|
Marsh KM, Lattimore CM, Cramer CL, Slingluff CL, Dengel LT. Subcostal lymph nodes: An unusual sentinel lymph node basin in cutaneous melanoma. J Surg Oncol 2022; 126:1272-1278. [PMID: 35870116 PMCID: PMC9707633 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Lymphatic drainage from subcostal nodes, along the costal groove, have not previously been characterized as sites for melanoma drainage and metastasis. This study reports a series of patients with subcostal nodes draining primary melanomas, with characterization of the sites of primary melanomas that drain to these nodes. METHODS Patients who presented to our institution between 2005 and 2020 with documented cutaneous melanoma and sentinel lymph node biopsy of a subcostal node (sentinel = S), or metastases to subcostal nodes later in clinical management (recurrent = R) were included. Patient demographics, melanoma pathology, nodal features, imaging information, surgical approaches, and outcomes data were collected. RESULTS Six patients had subcostal sentinel nodes (SNs). Primary sites included the posterior trunk and lateral chest wall. Subcostal nodes were found under ribs 10-12. Subcostal SNs had at least one dimension measuring 3 mm or less. There were no surgical complications related to removing the subcostal SN. CONCLUSIONS Melanoma can metastasize to subcostal lymph nodes and be found at the time of SN biopsy or identified at recurrence. These small nodes are fed by lymphatic channels that run in the neurovascular bundle under the ribs. When lymphatic mapping identifies a subcostal SN, it should be excised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Lynn T. Dengel
- Department of SurgeryUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleVirginiaUSA
| |
Collapse
|