Her-2/neu overexpression and response to oophorectomy plus tamoxifen adjuvant therapy in estrogen receptor-positive premenopausal women with operable breast cancer

Hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer in young women: A comprehensive review

The incidence of breast cancer in ≤ 40 yr-old women (YWBC) has been steadily increasing in recent decades. Although this group of patients represents less than 10 % of all newly diagnosed BC cases it encompasses a significant burden of disease. Usually underrepresented in clinical trials, YWBCs are also characterized by late diagnoses and poorly differentiated, aggressive-subtype disease, partly explaining its poor prognosis along with a high recurrence risk, and high mortality rates. On the other hand, YWBC treatment poses unique challenges such as preservation of fertility, and long-term toxicity and adverse events. Herein, we summarize the current evidence in hormone receptor-positive YWBC including specific risk factors, clinicopathologic and genomic features, and available evidence on response to chemotherapy and endocrine therapy. Overall, we advocate for a more comprehensive multidisciplinary healthcare model to improve the outcomes and the quality of life of this subset of younger patients.

Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 and endocrine resistance in hormone-dependent breast cancer

Endocrine therapies are the main treatment strategies for the clinical management of hormone-dependent breast cancer. Despite prolonged time to recurrence in the adjuvant setting and the initial clinical responses in the metastatic setting, many patients eventually encounter tumour relapse due to acquired resistance to these agents. Other patients experience a lack of tumour regression at the beginning of treatment indicating de novo resistance that significantly limits its efficacy in the clinic. There is compelling evidence that human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) overexpression contributes to resistance to endocrine therapies in oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. ER+/HER2+ tumours comprise about 10% of all breast cancer cases and about 60% of the whole set of HER2+ tumours. Most patients with primary ER+/HER2+ disease will receive antibody-based HER2-targeted therapy, but this is generally for no more than one year while endocrine treatment is usually for at least 5 years. A number of HER2-kinase inhibitors are also now in clinical use or in clinical trials, and the interaction of these with endocrine treatment may differ from that of antibody treatment. In this review article, we aim to summarise knowledge on molecular mechanisms of breast cancer resistance to endocrine therapies attributable to the impact of HER2 signalling on endocrine sensitivity, to discuss data from clinical trials addressing the role of HER2 in the development of endocrine resistance in the metastatic, neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings and to explore rational new therapeutic strategies.

Therapeutic Strategies for the Management of Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive (HR+/HER2+) Breast Cancer: A Review of the Current Literature

Enormous advances have been made in the understanding and treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer (HER2+ BC) in the last 30 years that have resulted in survival gains for affected patients. A growing body of evidence suggests that hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2+ BC and HR-negative (HR-)/HER2+ BC are biologically different, with complex molecular bidirectional crosstalk between the estrogen receptor and HER2 pathway potentially affecting sensitivity to both HER2-targeted and endocrine therapy in patients with HR+/HER2+ BC. Subgroup analyses from trials enrolling patients with HER2+ BC and the results of clinical trials specifically designed to evaluate therapy in patients with HR+/HER2+ BC are helping to guide treatment decisions. In this context, encouraging results with strategies aimed at delaying or reversing drug resistance, including extended adjuvant therapy and the addition of drugs targeting alternative pathways, such as cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4 and 6 inhibitors, have recently emerged. We have reached the point where tailoring the treatment according to risk and biology has become the paradigm in early BC. However, further clinical trials are needed that integrate translational research principles and identify and consider specific patient subgroups and biomarkers.

DPEP1 Balance GSH Involve in Cadmium Stress Response in Blood Clam Tegillarca granosa

The blood clam, Tegillarca granosa, is a benthic filter feeder with a strong capacity to accumulate and tolerate cadmium (Cd). In our previous study, DPEP1 was shown to be significantly up-regulated under Cd stress based on proteomic analysis. To investigate whether DPEP1 is involved in Cd-induced response, the function of DPEP1 in T. granosa was investigated by integrated molecular and protein approaches. Rapid amplification cDNA end (RACE) assay was established to achieve the complete cDNA sequence of DPEP1 from T. granosa. The full-length cDNA of DPEP1 was 1811 bp, and it contained a 1359-bp open reading frame (ORF), including a 22-amino acid signal peptide. qRT-PCR analysis revealed that DPEP1 was expressed in all examined tissues with the highest expression in gills. At the same time, we investigated DPEP1 gene expression changes after Cd stress at different time points over 96 h. We found that the expression of DPEP1 increased upon initial Cd stress, then it was inhibited, and finally, it was maintained at a low level. Moreover, recombinant DPEP1 showed that higher glutathione (GSH) hydrolysis activity in the temperature range of 30–40°C, and its maximum activity was at pH = 6. Additionally, the results of immunohistochemistry also confirmed that DPEP1 protein was expressed in all test tissues with the highest expression in gills. In addition, there was a positive correlation between QRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. These results suggested that DPEP1 is probably involved in Cd-induced response by balancing GSH.

Factors Predictive of Response to Hormone Therapy in Breast Cancer

Aims and Background

Approximately half of metastatic breast cancers expressing estrogen and/or progesterone receptors responds to endocrine therapy, and postoperative adjuvant endocrine therapy provides about a 50% reduction in the development of recurrent disease. A number of publications have focused on the correlation of biomarkers, in particular estrogen and progesterone receptors and HER-2/neu status as well as different gene profiles, multigene assays and genetic polymorphisms with response to hormone therapy. The purpose of this article is to review the literature to identify biological markers predictive of response to tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors.

Methods

A computerized literature search through Medline and ASCO abstract databases was performed, applying the words “endocrine therapy” and “predictive markers” and each of the following: early and metastatic breast cancer, estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors, HER2/neu, multigene assays, polymorphisms. The last search was updated in June 2007. In the examined literature, biological markers were retrospectively assayed to establish whether such variables were predictive for endocrine therapy efficacy.

Results

The role of estrogen receptor content as a predictor of response to endocrine treatment was confirmed: benefit from endocrine treatment was directly proportional to estrogen receptor levels. Progesterone receptor status was only a strong time-dependent prognostic value, and it has not yet been validated as a predictive factor of tamoxifen efficacy. Retrospective clinical data from upfront and sequential studies of aromatase inhibitors were discordant regarding the degree of benefit of these drugs over tamoxifen according to progesterone receptor status. HER-2 positivity was associated with a significantly greater risk of endocrine therapy failure in metastatic and neoadjuvant settings. The current generation of genomic assays for tamoxifen sensitivity all contain a combination of prognostic information that it is difficult to integrate into clinical practice.

Conclusions

Available clinical data are inconclusive to support preferential use of aromatase inhibitors over tamoxifen in progesterone-receptor-negative and HER-2-positive tumors, but it was also clear that lower estrogen receptors, lower progesterone receptors, and positive HER-2 are associated with lower responsiveness to any type of endocrine therapy. Tumors overexpressing HER-2 are endocrine resistant and they require the blockage of the HER-2 pathway in addition to estrogen deprivation. Recent molecular studies have shown that endocrine responsiveness is to a large extent influenced by estrogen-receptor-related pathways. In the future, the key to the correct tailoring of hormone therapy will probably be the ability to subtype estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer.

Optimal adjuvant endocrine treatment of ER+/HER2+ breast cancer patients by age at diagnosis: A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Prior randomised controlled trials on adjuvant hormonal therapy included HER2_any patients; however, a differential effect of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) versus tamoxifen (TAM) may have been missed in ER+/HER2+ patients that comprise 7-15% of all breast cancer patients. In addition, a woman's hormonal microenvironment may influence sensitivity to TAM and AIs in the adjuvant setting, which changes during menopausal transition, a process that takes years. We studied the efficacy of AIs versus TAM in ER+/HER2+ breast cancer patients grouped by age at diagnosis as a proxy for menopausal status using treatment and outcome data from the nationwide population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All women diagnosed between 2005 and 2007 with endocrine-treated, T_anyN_anyM₀, ER+/HER2+ breast cancer were identified through the NCR (n = 1155). Patients were divided by age at diagnosis: premenopausal (≤45 years; n = 326), perimenopausal (45<years≤55; n = 304) and postmenopausal (>55 years; n = 525). A time-dependent variable, indicating whether AI or TAM was received for >50% of endocrine treatment duration, was applied to subdivide groups by predominant treatment received. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival estimation and Cox regression. Hazard ratios (HRs) were adjusted for chemotherapy, trastuzumab, age at diagnosis, N-status, grade, pT-stage and ovarian ablation.

RESULTS

During follow-up, 237 recurrences and 182 deaths occurred. Perimenopausal women derived significant RFS and OS benefit from AI compared with TAM, HR 0.47 (95% CI 0.25-0.91; P = 0.03) and HR 0.37 (95% CI 0.18-0.79; P = 0.01), respectively, whereas premenopausal women derived no benefit from AI compared with TAM. Treatment effects differed significantly between these age groups (interaction P = 0.03 and P = 0.02, respectively). Among postmenopausal women a small but non-significant AI benefit was observed.

CONCLUSION

AI treatment, preferably without any TAM treatment, was associated with the best RFS and OS outcome in ER+/HER2+ perimenopausal breast cancer patients.

Navigating the Challenges of Endocrine Treatments in Premenopausal Women with ER-Positive Early Breast Cancer

Endocrine therapy is a key component of adjuvant treatment for premenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive tumors. It is commonly well tolerated, although side effects are a main concern in the selection of treatment options. Tamoxifen is still considered an adequate endocrine therapy in a large group of premenopausal patients (e.g. lower-risk patient, presence of co-morbidities, patient preference). Results of the SOFT and TEXT trials addressing new adjuvant endocrine treatment options in premenopausal patients were recently presented. Overall, in the SOFT study the premenopausal population did not benefit from the addition of ovarian function suppression (OFS). Nevertheless, for women at sufficient risk of recurrence to receive adjuvant chemotherapy and who maintained premenopausal estradiol, the addition of OFS to tamoxifen reduced the risk of recurrence. The magnitude of the effect was larger in younger patients. Moreover, in the SOFT and TEXT trials, adjuvant treatment with exemestane plus OFS, as compared with tamoxifen plus OFS, significantly improved disease-free survival, breast cancer-free interval and distant disease-free survival. However, premenopausal patients include heterogeneous subsets of women and tumors where costs and benefits of adjuvant endocrine therapy should be properly weighted. Issues specific for premenopausal patients, related to desire for pregnancy, family planning, safety, quality of life and subjective side effects, should be a priority in the therapeutic algorithm. Therefore, selecting the best-tolerated agent can enhance adherence to therapies and reduce the impact on quality of life and health status for these younger patients.

Hormone Receptor/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-positive breast cancer: Where we are now and where we are going

Near 75% of all breast cancers (BC) express estrogen receptors (ER) and/or progesterone receptors (PgR), while up to 20% of BC show an overexpression/amplification of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2). Around 50% of all HER2-overexpressing BC show the coexistence of both HER2 overexpression/amplification and ER and/or PgR overexpression. Numerous in vitro and in vivo studies suggest the existence of a cross-talk between their downstream pathways, which seem to affect the natural history, response to therapy and outcome of patients affected by this subset of BC. Meta-analyses or subgroup analysis of numerous neo-/adjuvant trials demonstrated significant clinical implications deriving from ER/HER2 co-existence, consisting in a different pattern of relapse and dissimilar outcome in response to anti-HER2 therapy. However, only two randomized trials in early disease and three in advanced disease specifically addressed the issue whether a combined approach with both hormonal and anti-HER2 therapy would have a better therapeutic impact in this subset of BC compared to the lone anti-HER2 or hormonal therapies (HT). None of these trials demonstrated improvements in overall survival, even though several efficacy end-points such as progression free survival, in advanced setting, or pCR rates in neoadjuvant setting, often favored the combined hormonal and anti-HER2 therapeutic approach. In the next few years, a certain number of ongoing randomized trials, both in neoadjuvant and advanced setting, will evaluate the efficacy of new anti-HER2 drugs, T-DM1 and pertuzumab, in combination with HT, helping to improve the therapeutic strategy for this specific subtype of breast tumors.

First international consensus guidelines for breast cancer in young women (BCY1)

The 1st International Consensus Conference for Breast Cancer in Young Women (BCY1) took place in November 2012, in Dublin, Ireland organized by the European School of Oncology (ESO). Consensus recommendations for management of breast cancer in young women were developed and areas of research priorities were identified. This manuscript summarizes these international consensus recommendations, which are also endorsed by the European Society of Breast Specialists (EUSOMA).

Hormonal therapies in young breast cancer patients: when, what and for how long?

Breast cancer in young women (<40 years) is a rare and complex clinical and psychosocial condition, which deserves multidisciplinary and personalized approaches. In young women with hormone-receptor positive disease, 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen, with or without ovarian suppression/ablation, is considered the standard endocrine therapy. The definitive role of adjuvant aromatase inhibitors has still to be elucidated: the upcoming results of the Tamoxifen and EXemestane Trial (TEXT) and Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial (SOFT) trials will help understanding if we can widen our current endocrine therapeutic options. The optimal duration of adjuvant endocrine therapy in young women also remains an unresolved issue. The recently reported results of the ATLAS and aTToM trials represent the first evidence of a beneficial effect of extended endocrine therapy in premenopausal women and provide an important opportunity in high-risk young patients. In the metastatic setting, endocrine therapy should be the preferred choice for endocrine responsive disease, unless there is evidence of endocrine resistance or need for rapid disease and/or symptom control. Tamoxifen in combination with ovarian suppression/ablation remains the 1st-line endocrine therapy of choice. Aromatase inhibitors in combination with ovarian suppression/ablation can be considered after progression on tamoxifen and ovarian suppression/ablation. Fulvestrant has not yet been studied in pre-menopausal women. Specific age-related treatment side effects (i.e., menopausal symptoms, change in body image and weight gain, cognitive function impairment, fertility damage/preservation, long-term organ dysfunction, sexuality) and the social impact of diagnosis and treatment (i.e., job discrimination, family management) should be carefully addressed when planning long-lasting endocrine therapies in young women with hormone-receptor positive early and advanced breast cancer.

Using decision aids to improve treatment choices for women with breast cancer

SUMMARY Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women worldwide and decision-making regarding treatment options can be complex; however, patients often desire to be involved in health-related decisions. There has been a growing body of research into decision-support tools such as decision aids (DAs). Generally, DAs outperform standard care over a range of decision-making outcomes and there are some that have been developed for use with breast cancer patients across the treatment trajectory, which have been evaluated for use in practice. There is scope for developing additional DAs for cancer patients, however, there are some limitations and barriers that need to be overcome as part of the implementation process. Consideration for the mechanisms for maintaining relevancy of materials and ease of accessibility is also needed.

Breast cancer in young women: climbing for progress in care and knowledge

Approximately a third of newly diagnosed invasive breast cancers occur in women aged under 50 years and it is likely that the incidence of the disease in younger women will further increase as a result of demographic and lifestyle changes and progress in screening. Breast cancer in young women is different from that in older patients. Young women with breast cancer represent a distinct population for which tailored diagnostic, therapeutic and supportive interventions are required. This review highlights the complex diagnostic and therapeutic processes that women and care providers are faced with. Topics addressed include the need for more sensitive and specific diagnostic tools that are capable of detecting cancer in dense breasts, the development of individualized surgical and medical treatments in the early and advanced disease setting aimed at improving outcome and reducing long-term side effects, and adequate psychosocial interventions.

Can predictive biomarkers in breast cancer guide adjuvant endocrine therapy?

Personalized medicine for oestrogen receptor-α (ERα)-positive breast cancer requires predictive biomarkers for broad endocrine resistance as well as biomarkers capable of predicting resistance to a specific agent. In addition, biomarkers could be used to select patients that might benefit from the addition of treatments that do not target ERα. However, biomarker identification studies seem to be far from consistent and identified biomarkers seldom face an introduction into clinical practice. Importantly, most of the studies that seek to identify biomarkers have been performed using material from consecutive series of patients treated with tamoxifen (the most commonly prescribed ERα antagonist). Consequently, the predictive value of any biomarker identified is confounded by its prognostic value. Another important issue is the lack of differentiation between premenopausal and postmenopausal patients with breast cancer. The hormonal environment of a tumour in patients who are premenopausal is intrinsically distinct from those arising in postmenopausal women. Biomarkers of different biological mechanisms might enable the prediction of either broad endocrine resistance or resistance to a specific agent in each of these patient subtypes. Ultimately, improvements to study design are needed to establish the clinical validity of the most promising biomarkers to predict benefit from endocrine therapy.

HER2 evaluation and its impact on breast cancer treatment decisions

BACKGROUND

Eighteen to twenty percent of breast cancer tumors show abnormal amplification of the Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2) gene and increased expression of the associated protein. HER2 amplification is associated with rapid tumor proliferation and shorter disease-free and overall survival. Because women with HER2 amplification are more likely to benefit from treatment with the drug trastuzumab, testing for HER2 is recommended to guide therapy. However, little is known about use of HER2 testing in real-world settings. This study examined uptake, use, appropriateness of HER2 testing, and the relationship between HER2 test results and treatment decisions.

METHODS

We assessed electronic data from 3,634 patients with invasive breast cancer diagnosed from 1998 to 2007 in a large integrated health system. We collected data on patient and tumor characteristics, HER2 testing status, test results, and trastuzumab treatment.

RESULTS

From 1998 to 2000, the percent of patients who underwent HER2 evaluation increased from 12 to 94%; <3% of women with ductal carcinoma in situ, for whom HER2 testing is not recommended, were tested. Trastuzumab use increased 5-fold after 2004, when guidelines expanded to include recommending adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer in addition to metastatic treatment. Ninety-five percent of women receiving trastuzumab had a positive HER2 result. After 2004, 55% of women with invasive breast cancer and overexpression of HER2 received trastuzumab treatment; this ranged from 44% of women with localized breast cancer to 80% of women with distant metastatic disease.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings illustrate appropriate and effective implementation of a HER2 testing strategy in a managed care setting.

HER2 status in operable breast cancers from Vietnamese women: Analysis by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and automated silver enhanced in situ hybridization (SISH)

BACKGROUND

HER2 amplification has been reported to occur in 19-30% of breast cancers in women from Western countries. Little is known about the HER2 status in breast cancers from Vietnamese women. The aim of this study was to assess the HER2 status in Vietnamese women with operable breast cancer using immunohistochemistry and silver in situ hybridization techniques.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Tissue blocks from 242 Vietnamese women with invasive primary breast carcinoma were stained by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and a dual silver in situ hybridization (SISH) for assessing HER2 status. The analysis followed international recommendations with a semi-quantitative grading of the reaction in four levels, "0", "1+", "2+" and "3+". The HER2 gene amplification was assessed by calculating the ratio of HER2/chromosome 17 in 20 tumor cell nuclei. A ratio of <1.8 was classified as non-amplification and a ratio >2.2 indicated tumors with gene amplification. A ratio between 1.8 and 2.2 was equivocal.

RESULTS

Using IHC, 39% of the tumors strongly expressed "3+" the HER2 protein. An intermediate level "2+" of the protein was found in 11% while 50% showed no or low "0/1+" levels of protein expression. Gene amplification was found in 95% and 46% of the tumors with high "3+" and intermediate "2+" levels of protein expression, respectively. Thus, 41% of the patients had tumors with HER2 amplification. The concordance between IHC and SISH was 87%. Gene amplification was more frequent in ER negative than in ER positive tumors, 57% versus 33%, respectively. Additionally, tumors from postmenopausal women were amplified in 55% as compared to 36% in premenopausal women.

CONCLUSIONS

HER2 gene amplification was found in 41% of Vietnamese breast cancers; this level is considerably higher than that previously found in a series of Swedish breast cancer women. The HER2-positive tumors were more often found in post-menopausal women than in ER negative tumors.

Testing for HER2 in Breast Cancer: A Continuing Evolution

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is an important prognostic and predictive factor in breast cancer. HER2 is overexpressed in approximately 15%–20% of invasive breast carcinomas and is associated with earlier recurrence, shortened disease free survival, and poor prognosis. Trastuzumab (Herceptin) a “humanized” monoclonal antibody targets the extracellular domain of HER2 and is widely used in the management of HER2 positive breast cancers. Accurate assessment of HER2 is thus critical in the management of breast cancer. The aim of this paper is to present a comprehensive review of HER2 with reference to its discovery and biology, clinical significance, prognostic value, targeted therapy, current and new testing modalities, and the interpretation guidelines and pitfalls.

Prognosis and adjuvant treatment effects in selected breast cancer subtypes of very young women (<35 years) with operable breast cancer

BACKGROUND

There is limited knowledge about prognosis of selected breast cancer subtypes among very young women.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We explored patterns of recurrence by age according to four immunohistochemically defined tumor subtypes: Luminal A and Luminal B (estrogen receptor positive and/or progesterone receptor positive and either human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive and/or high Ki-67), HER2-positive (and) endocrine receptor absent and Triple Negative, in 2970 premenopausal patients with pT1-3, pN0-3 and M0 breast cancer.

RESULTS

Patients <35 years of age (315, 11%) presented a significantly increased risk of recurrence and death [hazards ratio (HR) = 1.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.30-2.10 and HR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.12-2.85, respectively] when compared with older patients (2655, 89%) with similar characteristics of disease. This was true considering patients with Luminal B [HR = 1.62, 95% CI 1.21-2.18 for disease-free survival (DFS) and HR = 2.09, 95% CI 0.96-4.53 for overall survival (OS)] and with Triple Negative (HR = 2.04, 95% CI 1.11-3.72 for DFS and HR = 2.20, 95% CI 1.10-4.41 for OS) breast cancer, observing the highest risk of recurrence in the younger patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (HR = 2.37, 95% CI 1.12-5.02) when compared with older patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Very young patients with Triple Negative, Luminal B or HER2-positive breast cancer have a worse prognosis when compared with older patients with similar characteristics of disease.

Methotrexate, paclitaxel, and doxorubicin radiosensitize HER2-amplified human breast cancer cells to the Auger electron-emitting radiotherapeutic agent (111)In-NLS-trastuzumab

Our goal in this study was to elucidate the mechanisms by which methotrexate radiosensitizes HER2-positive human breast cancer cells to the Auger electron emitter (111)In-trastuzumab modified with nuclear-localization sequence peptides ((111)In-NLS-trastuzumab) and to compare these mechanisms with the potential sensitizing effects of paclitaxel and doxorubicin when combined with this radiopharmaceutical.

METHODS

Experiments were performed in MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells, their HER2-transfected subclones (231-H2N), and 2 trastuzumab-resistant variants (trastuzumab-resistant-1 and -2 [TrR1 and TrR2]). Effects of coexposure of these cells to (111)In-NLS-trastuzumab and low-dose, radiosensitizing methotrexate, paclitaxel, or doxorubicin were assessed by clonogenic cell-survival assay. Quantification of residual DNA damage was measured by the gammaH2AX-immunofluorescence assay, and cell cycle distribution was measured by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis. The radiation-enhancement ratio was calculated as the ratio of the surviving fraction (SF) of cells treated with (111)In-NLS-trastuzumab alone to that of cells treated concurrently with (111)In-NLS-trastuzumab and methotrexate, paclitaxel, or doxorubicin.

RESULTS

A reduction in the SF in HER2-positive 231-H2N (55.7% +/- 1.3%) and TrR1 (62.6% +/- 6.5%) cells was demonstrated after exposure to (111)In-NLS-trastuzumab (approximately 0.2 MBq/microg, 100 nmol/L) but not in MDA-MB-231 or TrR2 cells expressing low levels of HER2 (SF > 90%, P > 0.05). Coadministration of methotrexate, paclitaxel, or doxorubicin enhanced the cytotoxicity of (111)In-NLS-trastuzumab toward 231-H2N and TrR1 cells but not toward MDA-MB-231 or TrR2 cells. The radiation-enhancement ratios for methotrexate, paclitaxel, and doxorubicin for 231-H2N or TrR1 cells were 2.0-2.2, 1.6-1.8, and 2.7-2.8, respectively. Methotrexate or doxorubicin combined with (111)In-NLS-trastuzumab, compared to treatment with (111)In-NLS-trastuzumab alone, significantly increased residual gammaH2AX foci in 231-H2N and TrR1 cells but not in MDA-MB-231 or TrR2 cells or in any cell line treated concurrently with paclitaxel and (111)In-NLS-trastuzumab. Cells exposed to low-dose methotrexate accumulated in the G(1)/S phase of the cell cycle, whereas low-dose paclitaxel or doxorubicin caused cells to arrest in the G(2)/M phase.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose methotrexate, paclitaxel, or doxorubicin potently sensitized HER2-overexpressing human breast cancer cells, with and without acquired trastuzumab-resistance, to the Auger electron emissions from (111)In-NLS-trastuzumab through cell cycle distribution changes and in part through the inhibitory effects of these agents on DNA damage repair.

Management of HER2-positive breast cancer in Asia: consensus statement from the Asian Oncology Summit 2009

Patients with breast cancer positive for human epidermal growth-factor receptor type 2 (HER2) are an important subgroup for consideration in the Asian context. Rationally designed, anti-HER2 targeted agents that can substantially improve treatment outcomes have become commercially available, but are still too costly for some groups in developed countries and for underdeveloped and developing nations. This review discusses the available evidence for optimum management of HER2-positive early and advanced breast cancer, and how this evidence can be applied to Asian countries with different levels of health-care resources and economic development--using framework provided by the Breast Health Global Initiative. We provide a brief overview of HER2 testing and discuss management of early and advanced HER2-positive breast cancer, and formulate a consensus statement for the management of breast cancer in the context of basic, limited, enhanced, and maximum health-care resource availability.

Trastuzumab-resistant breast cancer cells remain sensitive to the auger electron-emitting radiotherapeutic agent 111In-NLS-trastuzumab and are radiosensitized by methotrexate

Our goals in this study were to determine whether (111)In-trastuzumab coupled to peptides harboring nuclear localizing sequences (NLSs) could kill trastuzumab-resistant breast cancer cell lines through the emission of Auger electrons and whether the combination of radiosensitization with methotrexate (MTX) would augment the cytotoxicity of this radiopharmaceutical.

METHODS

Trastuzumab was derivatized with sulfosuccinimidyl-4-(N-maleimidomethyl)cyclohexane-1-carboxylate for reaction with NLS peptides and then conjugated with diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid for labeling with (111)In. HER2 expression was determined by Western blot and by radioligand binding assay using (111)In-trastuzumab in a panel of breast cancer cell lines, including SK-BR-3, MDA-MB-231 and its HER2-transfected subclone (231-H2N), and 2 trastuzumab-resistant variants (TrR1 and TrR2). Nuclear importation of (111)In-NLS-trastuzumab and (111)In-trastuzumab in breast cancer cells was measured by subcellular fractionation, and the clonogenic survival of these cells was determined after incubation with (111)In-NLS-trastuzumab, (111)In-trastuzumab, or trastuzumab (combined with or without MTX). Survival curves were analyzed according to the dose-response model, and the radiation-enhancement ratio was calculated from the survival curve parameters.

RESULTS

The expression of HER2 was highest in SK-BR-3 cells (12.6 x 10(5) receptors/cell), compared with 231-H2N and TrR1 cells (6.1 x 10(5) and 5.1 x 10(5) receptors/cell, respectively), and lowest in MDA-MB-231 and TrR2 cells (0.4 x 10(5) and 0.6 x 10(5) receptors/cell, respectively). NLS peptides increased the nuclear uptake of (111)In-trastuzumab in MDA-MB-231, 231-H2N, TrR1, and TrR2 cells from 0.1%+/-0.01%, 2.5%+/-0.2%, 2.8%+/-0.7%, and 0.5%+/-0.1% to 0.5%+/-0.1%, 4.6%+/-0.1%, 5.2%+/-0.6%, and 1.5%+/-0.2%, respectively. The cytotoxicity of (111)In-NLS-trastuzumab on breast cancer cells was directly correlated with the HER2 expression densities of the cells. On a molar concentration basis, the effective concentration required to kill 50% of 231-H2N and TrR1 cells for (111)In-NLS-trastuzumab was 9- to 12-fold lower than for (111)In-trastuzumab and 16- to 77-fold lower than for trastuzumab. MDA-MB-231 and TrR2 cells were less sensitive to (111)In-NLS-trastuzumab or (111)In-trastuzumab, and both cell lines were completely insensitive to trastuzumab. The radiation-enhancement ratio induced by MTX for 231-H2N and TrR1 cells after exposure to (111)In-NLS-trastuzumab was 1.42 and 1.68, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Targeted Auger electron radioimmunotherapy with (111)In-NLS-trastuzumab can overcome resistance to trastuzumab, and MTX can potently enhance the sensitivity of HER2-overexpressing breast cancer cells to the lethal Auger electrons emitted by this radiopharmaceutical.

Crosstalk between the estrogen receptor and the HER tyrosine kinase receptor family: molecular mechanism and clinical implications for endocrine therapy resistance

Breast cancer evolution and tumor progression are governed by the complex interactions between steroid receptor [estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor] and growth factor receptor signaling. In recent years, the field of cancer therapy has witnessed the emergence of multiple strategies targeting these specific cancer pathways and key molecules (ER and growth factor receptors) to arrest tumor growth and achieve tumor eradication; treatment success, however, has varied and both de novo (up front) and acquired resistance have proven a challenge. Recent studies of ER biology have revealed new insights into ER action in breast cancer and have highlighted the role of an intimate crosstalk between the ER and HER family signaling pathways as a fundamental contributor to the development of resistance to endocrine therapies against the ER pathway. The aim of this review article is to summarize the current knowledge on mechanisms of resistance of breast cancer cells to endocrine therapies due to the crosstalk between the ER and the HER growth factor receptor signaling pathways and to explore new available therapeutic strategies that could prolong duration of response and circumvent endocrine resistant tumor growth.

Ductal carcinoma in situ and the emergence of diversity during breast cancer evolution

PURPOSE

Human invasive breast cancers (IBC) show enormous histologic and biological diversity. This study comprehensively evaluated diversity in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), the immediate precursors of IBCs.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The extent of diversity for conventional histologic grade and standard prognostic biomarkers assessed by immunohistochemistry was evaluated in a series of pure DCIS (n = 200) compared with a contemporaneous series of IBCs (n = 200). A subset of the DCIS (n = 25) was evaluated by DNA microarrays for the presence of luminal, basal, and erbB2 intrinsic subtypes. The extent of diversity within individual cases of DCIS (n = 120) was determined by assessing multiple regions independently for histologic (nuclear) grade and several biomarkers by immunohistochemistry, which approximate microarrays in determining intrinsic subtypes.

RESULTS

DCIS showed a broad distribution of conventional histologic grades and standard biomarkers ranging from well to poorly differentiated, nearly identical to IBCs. Microarrays showed the same intrinsic subtypes in DCIS as in IBCs. However, higher resolution analysis showed that multiple histologic grades, biomarker phenotypes, and intrinsic subtypes often coexist within the same DCIS, and these diverse regions probably compete for dominance. Diversity within cases of DCIS was highly correlated with mutated p53 (P = 0.0007).

CONCLUSIONS

These results support the hypothesis that poorly differentiated DCIS gradually evolve from well-differentiated DCIS by randomly acquiring genetic defects resulting in increasingly abnormal cellular features. This diversity is amplified by defects resulting in genetic instability (e.g., p53 mutation), and the alterations are propagated to IBC in a manner independent of progression to invasion.

Survival after adjuvant oophorectomy and tamoxifen in operable breast cancer in premenopausal women

PURPOSE

Worldwide, approximately 750,000 new cases of breast cancer are diagnosed annually in premenopausal women with limited economic resources. Longer-term survival benefits from adjuvant therapies in such women with operable breast cancer are unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1993 to 1999, we recruited 709 premenopausal women with operable breast cancer to a multisite randomized clinical trial of adjuvant oophorectomy and tamoxifen for 5 years or observation and this combined hormonal therapy on recurrence.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 7.0 years, disease-free and overall survival were significantly improved with the adjuvant treatment (log-rank P = .0003 and .0002, respectively). Five year disease-free survival (DFS) probabilities of 74% and 61% (95% CI for difference, 7% to 21%) and overall survival (OS) rates of 78% and 71% (95% CI for difference, 1% to 21%) were observed in the adjuvant and observation groups. Ten-year DFS probabilities of 62% and 51% (95% CI for difference, 4% to 22%) and OS probabilities of 70% and 52% (95% CI for difference, 6% to 34%) between adjuvant and observation groups, respectively, were observed. In the subset of estrogen receptor-positive patients, 5-year DFS probabilities were 83% and 61%, and 10-year DFS probabilities were 66% and 47%, while 5-year OS probabilities were 88% and 74%, and 10-year OS probabilities were 82% and 49% in the adjuvant and observation groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In premenopausal women with operable breast cancer not selected for estrogen receptor status or with estrogen receptor-positive tumors, 5- and 10-year DFS and OS rates are significantly improved following adjuvant oophorectomy and tamoxifen.

American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer

PURPOSE

To update the recommendations for the use of tumor marker tests in the prevention, screening, treatment, and surveillance of breast cancer.

METHODS

For the 2007 update, an Update Committee composed of members from the full Panel was formed to complete the review and analysis of data published since 1999. Computerized literature searches of MEDLINE and the Cochrane Collaboration Library were performed. The Update Committee's literature review focused attention on available systematic reviews and meta-analyses of published tumor marker studies. In general, significant health outcomes (overall survival, disease-free survival, quality of life, lesser toxicity, and cost-effectiveness) were used for making recommendations. Recommendations and

CONCLUSIONS

Thirteen categories of breast tumor markers were considered, six of which were new for the guideline. The following categories showed evidence of clinical utility and were recommended for use in practice: CA 15-3, CA 27.29, carcinoembryonic antigen, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, urokinase plasminogen activator, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, and certain multiparameter gene expression assays. Not all applications for these markers were supported, however. The following categories demonstrated insufficient evidence to support routine use in clinical practice: DNA/ploidy by flow cytometry, p53, cathepsin D, cyclin E, proteomics, certain multiparameter assays, detection of bone marrow micrometastases, and circulating tumor cells.

Age interacts with the expression of steroid and HER-2 receptors in operable invasive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The negative association between the oestrogen receptor (ER) and the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) in breast cancer travels in both directions. ER+ tumours are less likely HER-2+ and HER-2+ tumours are less likely ER+.

METHODS

We studied the age-related immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of ER, progesterone receptor (PR) and HER-2 in 2,227 tumours using age as a continuous variable. Steroid receptors were considered positive for any nuclear staining of invasive cancer cells and for HER-2, either for strong expression by IHC (score 3+) or gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). Based on nonparametric regression, the age-related association between steroid receptors and HER-2 was presented as likelihood curves.

RESULTS

The association between ER or PR and HER-2 is age-related. The age-related expression of ER and PR is HER-2 dependent. In HER-2(-) cases, the odds ratio (OR) for being ER+ was 2.594 (95% CI = 1.874-3.591) up to age 50 and age-independent thereafter; for PR-expression the OR was 2.687 (95% CI = 1.780-4.057) up to age 45 and 0.847 (95% CI = 0.761-0.942) thereafter. In HER-2+ cases, the OR was 0.806 (95% CI = 0.656-0.991) to be ER+ and 0.722 (95% CI = 0.589-0.886) to be PR+. The age-related OR for breast cancers to be HER-2+ is steroid receptor dependent. Taking together, ER+PR+HER-2+ breast cancers appear on average 5.4 years earlier than breast cancers of any other ER/PR/HER-2 phenotype (95% CI = 3.3-7.5; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

There is a qualitative interaction between age and expression of steroid and HER-2 receptors. Our findings suggest a strong age-related selective growth advantage for breast tumour cells belonging to the ER+PR+HER-2+ subgroup.

HER2 status in hormone receptor positive premenopausal primary breast cancer adds prognostic, but not tamoxifen treatment predictive, information

BACKGROUND

Overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) or amplification of its gene is a prognostic factor in primary breast cancer and a predictor for tamoxifen treatment efficacy in oestrogen receptor (ER) positive disease. In the present study we explored a defined cohort of breast cancer patients included in a randomised trial in order to assess prognostic and tamoxifen treatment information yielded by HER2 status.

METHODS

Premenopausal breast cancer patients with stage II tumours (n = 564) were included and allocated to 2 years of adjuvant tamoxifen treatment versus no adjuvant treatment. ER, progesterone receptor (PR) status and HER2 status was determined by immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarray. HER2 amplification was analysed by fluorescent in situ hybridisation and tumours being amplified and/or HER2 3+ were considered HER2+. HER2 status was evaluable in 83% of the patients and 12.6% were HER2+. In untreated patients, HER2 was a negative prognostic factor in ER+ patients, HR 2.95; 95% CI: 1.61-5.38, p < 0.001, but not in ER- patients, HR 0.67; 95% CI: 0.28-1.61, p = 0.4, and a significant interaction between the two markers was found, p < 0.01. HER2 status was not related to tamoxifen treatment efficacy in ER+ patients (term of interaction p = 0.95). When stratifying for PR status, similar results were achieved.

DISCUSSION

HER2+ and ER+ breast cancer constituted a subgroup of tumours with poor prognosis in premenopausal breast cancer, whereas no treatment interaction was found between HER2 status and tamoxifen in ER+ tumours. The poor prognosis in HER2+ and ER+ patients may interfere with the interpretation of HER2 data in non-randomised trials of adjuvant tamoxifen.

HER2/neu in systemic therapy for women with breast cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Amplification and/or overexpression of the HER2/neu gene is associated with a poor prognosis in breast cancer. Many studies have suggested that this gene may be associated with the relative efficacy of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy options.

METHODS

A systematic review of the evidence was conducted. MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting proceedings, and the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposia proceedings were all searched to November 2006 for reports of analysis by HER2/neu status of the relative efficacy of the treatment arms in randomized controlled trials.

RESULTS

Thirty-five trials were identified. A meta-analysis of trials of tamoxifen versus observation found no significant interaction between treatment and HER2/neu status, although one trial not included in the meta-analysis did find interaction. A meta-analysis of adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy trials found a significant interaction (difference in disease-free survival log-hazard ratios -0.31, 95% confidence interval -0.50 to -0.13; difference in overall survival log-hazard ratios -0.34, 95% confidence interval -0.53 to -0.14). Significant interaction was also found in a meta-analysis of disease-free survival in trials of adjuvant taxane therapy versus non-taxane therapy (difference in disease-free survival log-hazard ratios -0.36, 95% confidence interval -0.68 to -0.04). HER2/neu overexpression and/or amplification was associated with greater efficacy of the anthracycline or taxane regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence supports the conclusion that the benefit of both anthracycline-based and taxane-based adjuvant chemotherapy is associated on HER2/neu status, with patients with HER2/neu-positive cancers benefiting more from these therapies than those with HER2/neu-negative cancers.

Activated ERK1/2 and phosphorylated oestrogen receptor alpha are associated with improved breast cancer survival in women treated with tamoxifen

The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of activated (phosphorylated) ERK1/2, oestrogen receptor alpha phosphorylated at S118 (ERalphaS118), and HER2 in primary breast cancer, and to make correlations with the outcome of tamoxifen therapy. We performed immunohistochemical analysis to determine the expression of HER2, ERalphaS118, and activated ERK1/2 in tumours obtained from 279 women with primary breast cancer. HER2 status was also estimated by fluorescence in situ hybridisation. We identified 108 women with ERalpha-positive tumours who had received adjuvant tamoxifen. Activated ERK1/2 (pERK1/2) and ERalphaS118 were found to be associated with each other and with other factors correlated with good prognosis. HER2 was inversely associated with pERK1/2. Positive staining for pERK1/2 (particularly intense staining) indicated better relapse-free survival (P=0.05) and a trend towards better breast cancer-corrected survival in women treated with tamoxifen. To conclude, this study shows that activated ERK1/2 and ERalphaS118 are associated with improved survival. The poorer outcome in HER2-positive women who receive adjuvant tamoxifen cannot be explained by the crosstalk between HER2 and ERalphaS118 via activated ERK1/2 alone.

Prognostic role of epidermal growth factor receptor in localized breast cancer: 15 Years of follow-up

Background: The expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) in breast cancer (BC) is generally considered as an unfavorable event during tumor progression. Its predictive role has been fairly well defined: EGF-R expression predicts tamoxifen unresponsiveness. EGF-R role in autocrine growth regulation was confirmed. However, reported results on its prognostic role in BC patients were conflicting. The prognostic role of EGF-R after 15 years of follow-up is analyzed in a group of 70 localized BC patients, presented at diagnosis in clinical stages I-III. Methods: BC patients newly diagnosed from December 1990 until March 1991, treated in accordance to the National Protocol, were selected for EGF-R analysis. Steroid receptors and EGF-R were determined at diagnosis in same frozen tissue samples, using biochemical methods. Except 6 patients who were lost from follow-up in the interval shorter than 60 months, the remaining patients were followed-up from 60-188 months. The total number of events was 32 relapses (46%), and 27 deaths (38.5%). Results: EGF-R expression was found in 28/70 patients (40%), and the EGF-R content higher than 26 fmol - in 15/70 patients (21%). Neither the expression, nor the high content of EGF-R showed any influence on disease-free or overall survival. Levels of EGF-R were similar in relapsing and relapse-free patients. Nodal status had the strongest infuence on prognosis. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the controversial findings, regarding the EGF-R prognostic role, might be the consequence of a genuine weak influence of EGF-R expression on disease outcome. .

Co-expression of steroid hormone receptors (estrogen receptor alpha and/or progesterone receptors) and Her2/neu (c-erbB-2) in breast cancer: clinical outcome following tamoxifen-based adjuvant therapy

In breast cancer patients, the expression of steroid hormone receptors (HR:ERalpha/PR) appears inversely correlated with Her2/neu (not all reports agree on this negative correlation). Moreover, some but not all studies suggest that HR+/Her2/neu+ patients have a poor response to endocrine therapy, making this special group a matter of debate. In this prospective study we have analyzed the clinical outcome of our HR+/Her2/neu+ patients (n=51) selected from 516 consecutive stages I-II cases, with a follow-up 5-10 years (mean 7.3), treated with standard adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen (TAM) (TAM alone or TAM after chemotherapy). This group was compared with the HR+/Her-2/neu- patients (n=129) treated also with TAM. The tumor biopsies were studied by immunohistochemistry. We found that the association HR+/Her2/neu- was 2.5 times higher than the association HR+/Her2/neu+ (25% versus 9.9%, respectively). Our study also showed that the disease free survival (DFS) of the patients co-expressing HR and Her2/neu was significantly lower than those expressing HR but lacking of Her2/neu (p<0.001). A similar result was obtained when the overall survival (OS) was evaluated (p=0.001). All of these patients received hormone therapy with TAM, alone or after chemotherapy. When the analysis was performed in the patients treated with TAM alone, again the expression of Her-2/neu had a negative impact on both the DFS and the OS (p<0.05).

Adjuvant endocrine therapies for pre-/perimenopausal women

Endocrine therapy in the form of ovarian ablation was developed over a century ago. It remains nonetheless one of the most effective and most clearly targeted form of systemic therapy for breast cancer. Endocrine or hormonal therapy has an effect on virtually only those women whose tumors are positive for estrogen receptors (ER) and/or progesterone receptors (PgR). The presence of these steroid hormone receptors remains the most useful predictive factor in selecting therapy for breast cancer.

Meeting Highlights: International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2005

The ninth St Gallen (Switzerland) expert consensus meeting in January 2005 made a fundamental change in the algorithm for selection of adjuvant systemic therapy for early breast cancer. Rather than the earlier approach commencing with risk assessment, the Panel affirmed that the first consideration was endocrine responsiveness. Three categories were acknowledged: endocrine responsive, endocrine non-responsive and tumors of uncertain endocrine responsiveness. The three categories were further divided according to menopausal status. Only then did the Panel divide patients into low-, intermediate- and high-risk categories. It agreed that axillary lymph node involvement did not automatically define high risk. Intermediate risk included both node-negative disease (if some features of the primary tumor indicated elevated risk) and patients with one to three involved lymph nodes without additional high-risk features such as HER 2/neu gene overexpression. The Panel recommended that patients be offered chemotherapy for endocrine non-responsive disease; endocrine therapy as the primary therapy for endocrine responsive disease, adding chemotherapy for some intermediate- and all high-risk groups in this category; and both chemotherapy and endocrine therapy for all patients in the uncertain endocrine response category except those in the low-risk group.

Tumor-specific expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 but not vascular endothelial growth factor or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 is associated with impaired response to adjuvant tamoxifen in premenopausal breast cancer

PURPOSE

Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) are often coexpressed in breast cancer, and potentially affect cellular pathways and key proteins such as the estrogen receptor (ER) targeted by endocrine treatment. We therefore explored the association between adjuvant tamoxifen treatment in breast cancer and expression of VEGF-A and VEGFR2, as well as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), which represents a candidate gene product involved in tamoxifen resistance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Immunohistochemical expression of tumor-specific VEGF-A, VEGFR2, and HER2 was evaluated in tumor specimens from premenopausal breast cancer patients randomly assigned to 2 years of tamoxifen or no treatment (n = 564), with 14 years of follow-up. Hormone receptor status was determined in 96% of the tumors.

RESULTS

VEGF-A, VEGFR2, and HER2 were assessable in 460, 472, and 428 of the tumors, respectively. In patients with ER-positive and VEGFR2-low tumors, adjuvant tamoxifen significantly increased recurrence-free survival (RFS; [HR] hazard ratio for RFS, 0.53; P = .001). In contrast, tamoxifen treatment had no effect in patients with VEGFR2-high tumors (HR for RFS, 2.44; P = .2). When multivariate interaction analyses were used, this difference in treatment efficacy relative to VEGFR2 expression status was statistically significant for both ER-positive (P = .04) plus ER-positive and progesterone receptor-positive tumors. We found no significant difference in tamoxifen treatment effects in relation to VEGF-A or HER2 status.

CONCLUSION

Tumor-specific expression of VEGFR2 was associated with an impaired tamoxifen effect in hormone receptor-positive premenopausal breast cancer. Tamoxifen in combination with VEGFR2 inhibitors might be a novel treatment approach for VEGFR2-expressing breast cancer, and such a treatment might restore the tamoxifen response.

Association between tumour characteristics and HER-2/neu by immunohistochemistry in 1362 women with primary operable breast cancer

AIMS

To investigate the association between tumour characteristics and HER-2/neu by immunohistochemistry in primary operable breast cancer.

METHODS

The association between HER-2/neu and other clinicopathological factors was evaluated in 1362 consecutive patients with primary breast cancer treated between 2000 and July 2003 in one centre. Microscopic tumour size, tumour grade, lymph node status, patient's age, oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and joint ER/PR status were evaluated, using the chi2 test for univariate analysis and logistic regression for multivariate analysis. The hormone receptors and HER-2/neu were studied immunohistochemically. Using the HER-2/neu DAKO scoring system, scores of 0, 1+, or 2+ were defined as negative and 3+ as positive. Data for DAKO scores 2+/3+ versus 0/1+ are also presented.

RESULTS

Hormone receptor negative breast cancers were more often HER-2/neu positive than hormone receptor positive cancers, both for ER (28.7% v 6.8%) and PR (19.9% v 5.9%). In multivariate analysis, both ER, PR, and tumour grade were independently associated with HER-2/neu. In ER+ tumours, HER-2/neu overexpression was significantly lower in PR+ than in PR- cases (11.5% v 5.4%). HER-2/neu overexpression (2.7%) was lowest in the large subgroup of ER+PR+ tumours with low tumour grade (grade 1-2), comprising 46.1% of all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

ER, PR, and tumour grade are independent predictors for HER-2/neu overexpression in women with primary operable breast cancer. ER and PR are negatively associated with HER-2/neu, whereas tumour grade is positively associated with HER-2/neu. In women with ER+ tumours, PR status also affects the likelihood of HER-2/neu expression.