Survival of patients with advanced colorectal cancer improves with the availability of fluorouracil-leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin in the course of treatment

Exploring Predictive and Prognostic Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. While immune checkpoint inhibitors have significantly improved patient outcomes, their effectiveness is mostly limited to tumors with microsatellite instability (MSI-H/dMMR) or an increased tumor mutational burden, which comprise 10% of cases. Advancing personalized medicine in CRC hinges on identifying predictive biomarkers to guide treatment decisions. This comprehensive review examines established tissue markers such as KRAS and HER2, highlighting their roles in resistance to anti-EGFR agents and discussing advances in targeted therapies for these markers. Additionally, this review summarizes encouraging data on promising therapeutic targets and highlights the clinical utility of liquid biopsies. By synthesizing current evidence and identifying knowledge gaps, this review provides clinicians and researchers with a contemporary understanding of the biomarker landscape in CRC. Finally, the review examines future directions and challenges in translating promising biomarkers into clinical practice, with the goal of enhancing personalized medicine approaches for colorectal cancer patients.

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Patients with Concomitant Cancer: A Literature Review

OBJECTIVES

Abdominal aortic aneurysmal (AAA) repair in patients with concomitant cancer is controversial due to increased comorbidity and reduced life expectancy in this specific patient group. This literature review aims to investigate the evidence supporting one treatment modality over another (endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) or open repair (OR)), as well as treatment strategy (staged AAA-, cancer first or simultaneous procedures) in patients with AAA and concomitant cancer.

METHODS

Literature review, including studies published from 2000 to 2021 on surgical treatment in patients with AAA and concomitant cancer and related outcomes (30-day morbidity/complications as well as 30-day and 3-year mortality).

RESULTS

24 studies comprising 560 patients undergoing surgical treatment of AAA and concomitant cancer were included. Of these, 220 cases were treated with EVAR and 340 with OR. Simultaneous procedures were performed in 190 cases, 370 received staged procedures. The 30-day mortality for EVAR versus OR was 1% and 8%, corresponding to a relative risk (RR) of 0.11 (95% CI: 0.03-0.46, p = 0.002). No difference in mortality was observed between staged versus simultaneous procedure nor between AAA-first versus cancer-first strategy, RR 0.59 (95% CI: 0.29-1.1, p = 0.13) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.34-2.31, p = 0.80), respectively. Overall, 3-year mortality was 21% for EVAR and 39% for OR from 2000-2021, while the mortality up to 3 years after EVAR within recent years (2015-2021) was 16%.

CONCLUSION

This review supports EVAR treatment as first choice if suitable. No consensus was established on treating either the aneurysm or the cancer first or simultaneously. Long-term mortality after EVAR was comparable to non-cancer patients within recent years.

Unveiling the Intermolecular Interactions between Drug 5-Fluorouracil and Watson-Crick/Hoogsteen Base Pairs: A Computational Analysis

The adsorption of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) on Watson-Crick (WC) base pairs and Hoogsteen (HT) base pairs has been studied using the dispersion-corrected density functional theory (DFT). The adsorption, binding energy, and thermochemistry for the drug 5FU on the WC and HT base pairs were determined. The most stable geometries were near planar geometry, and 5FU has a higher preference for WC than HT base pairs. The adsorption energies of 5FU on nucleobase pairs are consistently higher than pristine nucleobase pairs, indicating that nucleobase pair cleavage is less likely during the adsorption of the 5FU drug. The enthalpy change for the formation of 5FU-DNA base pairs is higher than that for the formation of 5FU-nucleobases and is enthalpy-driven. The E gap of AT base pairs is higher, suggesting that their chemical reactivity toward further reaction would be less than that of GC base pairs. The electron density difference (EDD) analysis shows a significant decrease in electron density in aromatic regions on the purine bases (adenine/guanine) compared to the pyrimidine bases. The MESP diagram of the stable 5FU-nucleobase pair complexes shows a directional interaction, with the positive regions in a molecule interacting with the negative region of other molecules. The atoms in molecule analysis show that the ρ(r) values of C=O···H-N are higher than those of N···H/N-H···O. The N···H intermolecular bonds between the base pair/drug and nucleobases are weak, closed shell interactions and are electrostatic in nature. The noncovalent interaction analysis shows that several new spikes are engendered along with an increase in their strength, which indicates that the H-bonding interactions are stronger and play a dominant role in stabilizing the complexes. Energy decomposition analysis shows that the drug-nucleobase pair complex has a marginal increase in the electrostatic contributions compared to nucleobase pair complexes.

Isthmin-1 promotes growth and progression of colorectal cancer through the interaction with EGFR and YBX-1

While previous studies have indicated the involvement of Isthmin 1 (ISM1), a secreted protein, in cancer development, the precise mechanisms have remained elusive. In this study, we unveiled that ISM1 is significantly overexpressed in both the blood and tissue samples of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, correlating with their poor prognosis. Functional experiments demonstrated that enforced ISM1 expression significantly enhances CRC proliferation, migration, invasion and tumor growth. Notably, our investigation reveals an interaction of ISM1 with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a member of the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) family of CRC cells. The binding of ISM1 triggered EGFR activation and initiate downstream signaling pathways. Meanwhile, intracellular ISM1 interacted with Y-box binding protein 1 (YBX1), enhancing its transcriptional regulation on EGFR. Furthermore, our research uncovered the regulation of ISM1 expression by the hypoxia-inducible transcription factor HIF-1α in CRC cells. Mechanistically, we identified HIF-1α as a direct regulator of ISM1, binding to a hypoxia response element on its promoter. This novel mechanism illuminated potential therapeutic targets, offering insights into restraining HIF-1α/ISM1/EGFR-driven CRC progression and metastasis.

Causes of death in patients operated for colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer remains the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. This study evaluates the causes of death in patients operated on for colorectal cancer and their determinants.

METHODS

An Instructional Review Board-approved database containing patients who underwent surgical resection for colorectal cancer from 2004 to 2018 (last followed up in December 2020) in a tertiary care institution. Data on the underlying cause of death was extracted from the Registry of Vital Records and Statistics in Massachusetts.

RESULTS

A total of 576 deaths were recorded in the database, of which 290 (50.35%) patients died of colorectal cancer. Deaths from colorectal cancer gradually decreased over time, whereas deaths from other cancers increased, and deaths from cardiovascular diseases remained stable. Patients who died from colorectal cancer were younger, died earlier in the disease course, had fewer comorbidities, higher rates of stage IV disease, rectal cancer, neoadjuvant therapy, extramural vascular invasion, perineural invasion, R0 resection, and preserved mismatch repair protein status. On multivariate analysis, age (adjusted odds ratio for 10-year increase = 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.65-0.95), American Society of Anesthesiologists score (adjusted odds ratio = 0.64, confidence interval 0.42-0.98), stage IV disease (adjusted odds ratio = 3.02, confidence interval 1.59-5.9), neoadjuvant therapy (adjusted odds ratio = 7.91, confidence interval 2.64-28.13), extramural vascular invasion (adjusted odds ratio = 2.3, confidence interval 1.36-3.91) & time from diagnosis to death (adjusted odds ratio = 0.76, confidence interval 0.68-0.83) predicted death due to colorectal cancer versus other causes, whereas tumor location, perineural invasion, R0 resection, and mismatch repair protein status did not.

CONCLUSION

There is a declining trend of deaths from colorectal cancer, presumably reflecting advances in colorectal cancer management strategies and better screening over time. However, younger patients disproportionately contribute to death due to colorectal cancer and need aggressive screening and management strategies.

Orosomucoid 2 upregulation mediates liver injury-induced colorectal cancer liver metastasis by promoting EMT and cell migration

The relationship between drug-induced liver injury and liver metastasis of colorectal cancer and the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. In this study, we used carbon tetrachloride to construct a classic mouse liver injury model and injected CT26 colorectal cancer cells into the mouse spleen to simulate the natural route of colorectal cancer liver metastasis. Liver injury significantly increased the number of colorectal cancer liver metastases. Transcriptome sequencing and data-independent acquisition protein quantification identified proteins that were significantly differentially expressed in injured livers, and orosomucoid (ORM) 2 was identified as a target protein for tumor liver metastasis. In vitro experiments showed that exogenous ORM2 protein increased the expression of EMT markers such as Twist, Zeb1, Vim, Snail1 and Snail2 and chemokine ligands to promote CT26 cell migration. In addition, liver-specific overexpression of the ORM2 protein in the mouse model significantly promoted tumor cell liver metastasis without inducing liver injury. Our results indicate that drug-induced liver injury can promote colorectal cancer liver metastasis and that ORM2 can promote cell migration by inducing EMT in tumor cells.

Effectiveness of Biologic Agents Among Hispanic Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Randomized clinical trials have defined the survival advantage with the addition of biologic drugs to chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Under representation of Hispanics contributes to poorly defined outcomes in this group. We aim to determine whether the real-world benefit of biologics extends to Hispanics using a comparative effectiveness research approach.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included all treatment centers contributing to SEER registry with available claims in the SEER-Medicare linked database (2001-2011) and 2 hospitals (2004-2016) catering to minorities. Metastatic CRC patients were classified as receiving chemotherapy or biochemotherapy (CT plus biologics; if initiated within 3 months of chemotherapy). The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) among the Hispanic patients calculated from time of administration of first dose of chemotherapy to death or last follow-up. A weighted Cox regression model was used to assess differences in survival.

RESULTS

We identified 182 Hispanic patients with mCRC from the Patient Entitlement and Diagnosis Summary (PEDSF) file (n = 101) and hospital database (n = 81). Overall, 52% were women and 72% received biologics. The median OS was 11.3 and 17.0 months in chemotherapy and biochemotherapy group, respectively. Biochemotherapy offered a survival benefit compared with chemotherapy alone, with an average hazard rate reduction of 39% (95% CI 6%-60%, p = .0236) using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based analysis.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of Hispanic patients with mCRC, biochemotherapy was associated with longer survival. Clinicians may offer biochemotherapy therapy to all patients regardless of race/ethnicity to maximize clinical benefit.

Prediction of Clinical Precision Chemotherapy by Patient-Derived 3D Bioprinting Models of Colorectal Cancer and Its Liver Metastases

Methods accurately predicting the responses of colorectal cancer (CRC) and colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) to personalized chemotherapy remain limited due to tumor heterogeneity. This study introduces an innovative patient-derived CRC and CRLM tumor model for preclinical investigation, utilizing 3d-bioprinting (3DP) technology. Efficient construction of homogeneous in vitro 3D models of CRC/CRLM is achieved through the application of patient-derived primary tumor cells and 3D bioprinting with bioink. Genomic and histological analyses affirm that the CRC/CRLM 3DP tumor models effectively retain parental tumor biomarkers and mutation profiles. In vitro tests evaluating chemotherapeutic drug sensitivities reveal substantial tumor heterogeneity in chemotherapy responses within the 3DP CRC/CRLM models. Furthermore, a robust correlation is evident between the drug response in the CRLM 3DP model and the clinical outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. These findings imply a significant potential for the application of patient-derived 3DP cancer models in precision chemotherapy prediction and preclinical research for CRC/CRLM.

Raltitrexed Chemotherapy Regimen Plus Bevacizumab as Second-Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Phase II Trial

OBJECTIVES

Clinical studies have shown that bevacizumab plus chemotherapy significantly improves efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This prospective study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of changing second-line treatment to raltitrexed-based chemotherapy regimens plus bevacizumab in mCRC patients who have failed the first-line fluorouracil-based chemotherapy regimen with or without bevacizumab/cetuximab.

METHODS

This is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, phase II clinical study. A total of 100 patients with mCRC after failure of the first-line fluorouracil-based chemotherapy regimen with or without bevacizumab/cetuximab were enrolled from November 2016 to October 2021, and received second-line raltitrexed-based chemotherapy regimen plus bevacizumab. Patients were treated for 6 cycles, and efficacy evaluation over stable disease were followed by maintenance treatment of bevacizumab and raltitrexed until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), safety, and toxicity.

RESULTS

Ninety-four patients were treated with SALIRI (raltitrexed + irinotecan) plus bevacizumab, and six patients with SALOX (raltitrexed + oxaliplatin) plus bevacizumab. Median PFS was 8.4 (95% CI: 6.2-11.0) months, including 8.2 (95% CI 6.2, 11.0) months in the SALIRI group and 11.6 (95% CI 3.1, NA) months in the SALOX group. Median OS was 17.6 (95% CI 15.2, 22.0) months in the SALIRI group and 17.1 (95% CI 4.1, NA) months in the SALOX group. ORR and DCR were 25.5% and 87.2% in the SALIRI group, and 33.3% and 83.3% in the SALOX group, respectively. A low incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Raltitrexed-based chemotherapy regimens plus bevacizumab improved survival duration in mCRC patients with failed first-line therapy. Therefore, treatment with raltitrexed-based chemotherapy regimens plus bevacizumab could be a superior therapeutic option for second-line chemotherapy in mCRC (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT03126071).

Role of cGAS-STING in colorectal cancer: A new window for treatment strategies

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common and deadly form of cancer, leading to the need for new therapeutic targets and strategies for treatment. Recent studies have shown the cGAS-STING pathway to be a promising target for cancer therapy. The cGAS-STING pathway is a part of the innate immune system and serves to identify DNA damage and viral infection, promoting an immune response. Activation of this pathway leads to the production of immune mediators, such as type I interferons, that activate immune cells to attack cancer cells. Research has identified the cGAS-STING pathway as a frequently dysregulated component in CRC, promoting tumor growth and metastasis, or leading to chronic inflammation and tissue damage. The modulation of this pathway presents a potential therapeutic approach, either activating or inhibiting the pathway to enhance the immune response and prevent inflammation, respectively. Developing drugs that can modulate the cGAS-STING pathway offers promise for improving treatment outcomes for CRC patients. The present review explores recent research on the role of cGAS-STING in CRC and highlights the potential therapeutic benefits of targeting this pathway.

Systematic review: predictive value of organoids in colorectal cancer

While chemotherapy alone or in combination with radiotherapy and surgery are important modalities in the treatment of colorectal cancer, their widespread use is not paired with an abundance of diagnostic tools to match individual patients with the most effective standard-of-care chemo- or radiotherapy regimens. Patient-derived organoids are tumour-derived structures that have been shown to retain certain aspects of the tissue of origin. We present here a systematic review of studies that have tested the performance of patient derived organoids to predict the effect of anti-cancer therapies in colorectal cancer, for chemotherapies, targeted drugs, and radiation therapy, and we found overall a positive predictive value of 68% and a negative predictive value of 78% for organoid informed treatment, which outperforms response rates observed with empirically guided treatment selection.

Clusterin Expression in Colorectal Carcinomas

Colorectal cancer is the third most diagnosed cancer, behind only breast and lung cancer. In terms of overall mortality, it ranks second due to, among other factors, problems with screening programs, which means that one of the factors that directly impacts survival and treatment success is early detection of the disease. Clusterin (CLU) is a molecular chaperone that has been linked to tumorigenesis, cancer progression and resistance to anticancer treatments, which has made it a promising drug target. However, it is still necessary to continue this line of research and to adjust the situations in which its use is more favorable. The aim of this paper is to review the current genetic knowledge on the role of CLU in tumorigenesis and cancer progression in general, and discuss its possible use as a therapeutic target in colorectal cancer.

Current Status of Angiogenesis Inhibitors as Second-Line Treatment for Unresectable Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer is the third most common disease and the second most common cause of death around the world. The drug for second-line treatment depends on the drugs used in first-line treatment and the biomarker status. As biomarkers, the RAS gene, BRAF gene, and dMMR/MSI-H, TMB-H, and HER2 statuses have been established in clinical practice, and the corresponding molecularly targeted therapeutic agents are selected based on the biomarker status. Given the frequency of biomarkers, it is assumed that when patients move on to second-line treatment, an angiogenesis inhibitor is selected in many cases. For second-line treatment, three angiogenesis inhibitors, bevacizumab (BEV), ramucirumab (RAM), and aflibercept (AFL), are available, and one of them is combined with cytotoxic agents. These three angiogenesis inhibitors are known to inhibit angiogenesis through different mechanisms of action. Although no useful biomarkers have been established for the selection of angiogenesis inhibitors, previous biomarker studies have suggested that angiogenesis-related factors such as VEGF-A and VEGF-D might be predictors of the therapeutic efficacy of angiogenesis inhibitors. These biomarkers are measured as protein levels in plasma and are considered to be promising biomarkers. We consider that the rationale for selecting among these three angiogenesis inhibitors should be clarified to benefit patients.

Veliparib (ABT-888), a PARP inhibitor potentiates the cytotoxic activity of 5-fluorouracil by inhibiting MMR pathway through deregulation of MSH6 in colorectal cancer stem cells

OBJECTIVE

Sensitization of mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient colorectal cancer (CRC) cells by 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is well-documented. But not much is known about the treatment of MMR-proficient CRC cancer stem cells (CRC-CSCs). Here, we investigated whether a PARP inhibitor (ABT-888) can enhance the 5-FU-mediated apoptosis in CRC-CSCs through MMR pathway inhibition.

METHODS

The anti-cancer action of 5-FU+ABT-888 combination in CRC-CSCs has been studied by using in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo preclinical model systems.

RESULTS

5-FU caused DNA damage in CRC-CSCs, and ABT-888 enhanced the accumulation of DNA mismatches by downregulating the MMR pathway, triggering S-phase arrest, and finally apoptosis and cell death in 5-FU-pre-treated MMR-proficient-CRC-CSCs at much lower concentrations than their individual treatments. After 5-FU treatment, PARylated-PARP1 activated MMR pathway by interacting with MSH6. But, upon ABT-888 treatment in 5-FU-pre-exposed CSCs, PARylation was inhibited, as a result of which PARP1 could not interact with MSH6, and other MMR proteins were downregulated. The role of MSH6 in PARP1-mediated MMR activation, was confirmed by silencing MSH6 gene, which resulted in MMR pathway shutdown. Similar results were obtained in ex vivo and in vivo model systems.

CONCLUSIONS

5-FU+ABT-888 combination enhanced CRC-CSCs death by increasing DNA damage accumulation and simultaneously inhibiting the MMR pathway in MMR-proficient cells. But this study does not discuss whether the combination treatment will increase the sensitivity of MMR-deficient CSCs, for which further research will be performed in the future.

Evaluation of Fruquintinib in the Continuum of Care of Patients with Colorectal Cancer

The management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has the continuum of care as the treatment paradigm. To date, trifluridine/tipiracil, a biochemically modulated fluoropyrimidine, and regorafenib, a multi-kinase inhibitor, remain the main options for the majority of patients who progressed to standard doublet- or triplet-based chemotherapies, although a tailored approach could be indicated in certain circumstances. Being highly selective for vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-1, -2 and -3, fruquintinib demonstrated a strong anti-tumor activity in preclinical models and received approval from China's National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) in 2018 for the treatment of patients with chemo-refractory mCRC. The approval was based on the results of the phase III FRESCO trial. Then, in order to overcome geographic differences in clinical practice, the FRESCO-2 trial was conducted in the US, Europe, Japan, and Australia. In a heavily pretreated patient population, the study met its primary endpoint, demonstrating an advantage of fruquintinib over a placebo in overall survival (OS). Here, we review the clinical development of fruquintinib and its perspectives in gastrointestinal cancers. Then, we discuss the introduction of fruquintinib in the continuum of care of CRC paying special attention to unmet needs, including the identification of cross-resistant and potentially susceptible populations, evaluation of radiological response, and identification of novel biomarkers of clinical benefit.

Integrative analysis revealed that distinct cuprotosis patterns reshaped tumor microenvironment and responses to immunotherapy of colorectal cancer

Background

Cuprotosis is a novel form of programmed cell death that involves direct targeting of key enzymes in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle by excess copper and may result in mitochondrial metabolic dysfunction. However, whether cuprotosis may mediate the tumor microenvironment (TME) and immune regulation in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear.

Methods

Ten cuprotosis-related genes were selected and unsupervised consensus clustering was performed to identify the cuprotosis patterns and the correlated TME characteristics. Using principal component analysis, a COPsig score was established to quantify cuprotosis patterns in individual patients. The top 9 most important cuprotosis signature genes were analyzed using single-cell transcriptome data.

Results

Three distinct cuprotosis patterns were identified. The TME cell infiltration characteristics of three patterns were associated with immune-excluded, immune-desert, and immune-inflamed phenotype, respectively. Based on individual cuprotosis patterns, patients were assigned into high and low COPsig score groups. Patients with a higher COPsig score were characterized by longer overall survival time, lower immune cell as well as stromal infiltration, and greater tumor mutational burden. Moreover, further analysis demonstrated that CRC patients with a higher COPsig score were more likely to respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy. Single-cell transcriptome analysis indicated that cuprotosis signature genes recruited tumor-associated macrophages to TME through the regulation of TCA and the metabolism of glutamine and fatty acid, thus influencing the prognosis of CRC patients.

Conclusion

This study indicated that distinct cuprotosis patterns laid a solid foundation to the explanation of heterogeneity and complexity of individual TME, thus guiding more effective immunotherapy as well as adjuvant chemotherapy strategies.

The five-year KRAS, NRAS and BRAF analysis results and treatment patterns in daily clinical practice in Slovenia in 1st line treatment of metastatic colorectal (mCRC) patients with RAS wild-type tumour (wtRAS) - a real- life data report 2013-2018

BACKGROUND

We preformed a Phase IV non-interventional study to assess KRAS, NRAS and BRAF status in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients suitable for 1^st line treatment and to evaluate the decisions for 1^st line treatment considering the treatment goals in the RAS wild type (wt) patients. The aim of our study was also to evaluate the influence of a waiting period for biomarkers analysis on the start of first-line treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed mCRC adenocarcinoma suitable for first-line treatment fulfilling all inclusion criteria were included in the study. The KRAS, NRAS and BRAF analysis was performed from tissue samples of primary tumor site or metastatic site. All included patients have given consent to participate in the study by signing the informed consent form.

RESULTS

From April 2013 to March 2018 at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana 650 patients were included, 637 of them were treated with first- line systemic treatment according to RAS and BRAF status. Remaining 13 patients with mCRC did not receive systemic first-line treatment. The distribution of patients with KRAS mutated and wild-type tumors, was almost equal, 48.8% and 47.9% respectively, 89 % of the patients had wt NRAS tumours and 86.1% had wt BRAF tumours. The most frequently prescribed treatment was bevacizumab-based therapy (53.1%), either in combination with doublet chemotherapy or with mono-chemotherapy. EGFR inhibitors cetuximab and panitumumab were prescribed in wt RAS mCRC patients (30.9%). The waiting period for biomarkers analysis was two weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Our real-world data, single centre 5-year analysis showed that the distribution between wild type and mutated type tumors of the patients with mCRC was approximately the same, as worldwide, so the Slovenian population with mCRC has the same ratio distribution of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF wild and mutated genes. We concluded that a two-week waiting period for biomarkers analysis did not influence the first line treatment decision, so it was in the accordance with the worldwide treatment guidelines based on evidence-based medicine.

Outcomes Following Treatment with FOLFOX for Patients with Resectable or Potentially Resectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Population-based Cohort Study

AIMS

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of oxaliplatin-based combination chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) to extrahepatic sites.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a population-based retrospective study examining the safety and effectiveness of perioperative oxaliplatin for resectable or potentially resectable colorectal metastases in Ontario, Canada. Outcomes were also compared with patients with liver-only metastases. Patients received oxaliplatin for mCRC between 1 January 2013 and 30 June 2020.

RESULTS

In total, 192 patients had extrahepatic metastases. Seventy per cent had R0 metastasectomy. The 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival were 62% and 79%, respectively; <4% of patients died within 60 days of metastasectomy and 74-90% of patients received treatment according to recommendations from a multidisciplinary setting. Compared with liver-only controls (n = 1306), patients had mCRC to the lung only (n = 115), lung and liver (n = 55) and liver with non-pulmonary site (n = 22). Extrahepatic metastases were more likely to be found for patients whose primary colorectal resection had positive margins (14% versus 7%, P = 0.005) and primary tumours located in the rectum [odds ratio 4.01 (2.31-6.97)]. After adjustment, there was no difference in overall survival between liver-only controls and patients with lung-only [hazard ratio 0.82 (0.59-1.15)] or liver and lung metastases [hazard ratio 1.26 (0.85-1.87)] (P = 0.24). In total, 79/115 (69%) of patients with lung-only metastases had a metastasectomy compared with 645/1306 (49%) and 15/55 (27%) of patients with liver-only and liver and lung metastases, respectively. Hospital visits were similar between patients with liver-only and extrahepatic metastases.

CONCLUSION

Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for patients with resectable or potentially resectable mCRC with extrahepatic metastases was safe and resulted in similar outcomes in appropriately selected patients when compared with patients with liver-only metastases.

Prognostic Factors of Bone Metastases From Colorectal Cancer in the Era of Targeted Therapy

BACKGROUND

Various prognostic factors have been reported for bone metastases from different primary tumor sites. However, bone metastases from colorectal cancer are very rare, and the prognostic factors have not been investigated in detail.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify prognostic factors of bone metastases from colorectal cancer.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study using data from a prospectively collected database.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at a single tertiary care cancer center in Japan.

PATIENTS

Patients who developed bone metastases from colorectal cancer during the study period among all patients who received initial treatment for colorectal cancer at our hospital between 2005 and 2016 (n = 4538) were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Overall survival after diagnosis of bone metastases from colorectal cancer was the main outcome measure.

RESULTS

Ninety-four patients developed bone metastases during the study period. The 5-year overall survival rate was 11.0%. Multivariable analysis identified the following independent risk factors associated with poor prognosis: ≥70 years of age at diagnosis of bone metastases (HR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.24-4.95; p < 0.01), curative surgery not performed as initial treatment (HR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.24-5.19; p = 0.01), multiple bone metastases (HR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.30-4.57; p < 0.01), albumin level <3.7 g/dL (HR, 3.80; 95% CI, 1.95-7.39; p < 0.01), CEA ≥30 ng/mL (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.09-3.46; p = 0.02), and less than 3 chemotherapy options remaining at diagnosis of bone metastases (HR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.51-5.30; p < 0.01). The median survival times for patients with 0-2, 3, and 4-6 risk factors were 25.0, 8.8, and 4.3 months, respectively.

LIMITATIONS

The main limitation is the single-center, retrospective design of this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results may facilitate multidisciplinary decision-making in patients with bone metastases from colorectal cancer. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B930 .

FACTORES PRONSTICOS DE LAS METSTASIS SEAS DEL CNCER COLORRECTAL EN LA ERA DE LA TERAPIA DIRIGIDA

ANTECEDENTES:Se han reportado varios factores pronósticos para las metástasis óseas de diferentes sitios de tumores primarios. Sin embargo, las metástasis óseas del cáncer colorrectal son muy raras y los factores pronósticos no se han investigado en detalle.OBJETIVO:Identificar los factores pronósticos de las metástasis óseas del cáncer colorrectal.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo utilizando datos de una base de datos recolectada prospectivamente.ENTORNO CLINICO:Un solo centro oncológico de atención terciaria en Japón.PACIENTES:Se seleccionaron pacientes que desarrollaron metástasis óseas de cáncer colorrectal durante el período de estudio entre todos los pacientes que recibieron tratamiento inicial para el cáncer colorrectal en nuestro hospital entre 2005 y 2016 (n = 4538).MEDIDA DE RESULTADO PRINCIPAL:Supervivencia general después del diagnóstico de metástasis óseas por cáncer colorrectal.RESULTADOS:Noventa y cuatro pacientes desarrollaron metástasis óseas, lo que representa el 2,0% de todos los pacientes con cáncer colorrectal que comenzaron el tratamiento durante el período de estudio. La tasa de supervivencia global a 5 años fue del 11,0 %. El análisis multivariable identificó los siguientes factores de riesgo independientes asociados con mal pronóstico: edad ≥70 años al momento del diagnóstico de metástasis óseas (hazard ratio 2,48, CI del 95 % 1,24-4,95, p < 0,01), cirugía curativa no realizada como tratamiento inicial (hazard ratio 2,54, CI 95 % 1,24-5,19, p = 0,01), metástasis óseas múltiples (hazard ratio 2,44, CI del 95 % 1,30-4,57, p < 0,01), nivel de albúmina <3,7 g/dL (hazard ratio 3,80, CI del 95 % 1,95 -7,39, p < 0,01), antígeno carcinoembrionario ≥30 ng/mL (hazard ratio 1,94, CI del 95 % 1,09-3,46, p = 0,02) y menos de 3 opciones de quimioterapia restantes al momento del diagnóstico de metástasis óseas (hazard ratio 2,83, 95 % CI 1,51-5,30, p < 0,01). La mediana de los tiempos de supervivencia para los pacientes con 0-2, 3 y 4-6 factores de riesgo fue de 25,0, 8,8 y 4,3 meses, respectivamente.LIMITACIONES:Diseño retrospectivo de un solo centro.CONCLUSIÓN:Nuestros resultados pueden facilitar la toma de decisiones multidisciplinares en pacientes con metástasis óseas de cáncer colorrectal. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B930 . (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon ).

Regorafenib is suitable for advanced colorectal cancer patients who have previously received trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab

Regorafenib is a standard salvage line therapy used for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Recently, trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD) plus bevacizumab also showed promising efficacy as a salvage line therapy for advanced CRC. However, the efficacy and safety of regorafenib for patients with advanced CRC who have previously received TFTD plus bevacizumab is unclear. We retrospectively collected clinicopathologic data from patients with advanced CRC who received regorafenib after TFTD plus bevacizumab in multiple institutions between April 2017 and June 2020.Thirty-four advanced CRC patients who received regorafenib were analyzed. The median age was 66.5 (range 43-81 years), 11 patients were male, and all had an ECOG performance status(PS) of 0 or 1. Twenty-two patients had left-sided tumors, 18 patients had RAS mutants, and 1 patient had a BRAF V600E mutation. The response rate was 0%, and the disease control rate was 31%. The median progression-free survival was 70 days (95% CI: 56-91), and the overall survival was 233 days (95% CI: 188-324). Treatment was discontinued in 32 patients, and 28 (82%) discontinued treatment due to progressive disease. The major grade 3 and4 toxicities were proteinurea (29%), hypertension (26%), hand-foot syndrome(15%), and platelet decrease (6%). Regorafenib after TFTD plus bevacizumab showed efficacy similar to that of the previous study, and no new adverse events were observed.

Comparative Analysis of First-Line FOLFOX Treatment With and Without Anti-VEGF Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma: A Real-World Data Study

BACKGROUND

FOLFOX (leucovorin calcium [folinic acid], fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) combined with or without anti-VEGF therapy represents one of the primary first-line treatment options for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC). However, there is limited comparative data on the impact of anti-VEGF therapy on treatment effectiveness, survival outcomes, and tumor location.

METHODS

This retrospective, comparative study utilized data from the AIM Cancer Care Quality Program and commercially insured patients treated at medical oncology clinics in the US. We analyzed 1652 mCRC patients who received FOLFOX, of which 1015 (61.4%) were also treated with anti-VEGF therapy (VEGF cohort).

RESULTS

Patients in the VEGF cohort exhibited a higher frequency of lung (33% vs 23%; P < .001) and liver metastases (74% vs 62%; P < .001), underwent fewer liver surgeries prior to treatment (1.2% vs 3.6%; P = .002), and had a higher proportion of right-sided tumors (27% vs 18%; P = .001). Adjusted analysis revealed no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between patients treated with and without anti-VEGF (median survival: 25.4 vs 26.0 months; P = .4). FOLFOX-only treated patients experienced higher rates of post-treatment hospitalizations (22% vs 15%; P < .001). Notably, left-sided tumors treated with anti-VEGF showed a trend toward decreased OS (median survival: 26.8 vs 33 months; P = .09).

CONCLUSION

Our real-world data analysis suggests that the addition of anti-VEGF to FOLFOX offers limited and short-lived benefits in the context of mCRC and may provide differential survival benefit based on tumor sidedness.

Presentation of Colorectal Carcinoma as Abdominal Wall Phlegmon

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy and the second most common deadly cancer worldwide as of 2020. Unusual presentation of this cancer with locally advanced disease is rare and seen in only 5% to 22% of cases. We present the case of a 53-year-old male who had invasive cecal adenocarcinoma with phlegmon of the abdominal wall musculature at presentation and an aggressive course that did not respond to the standard lines of therapy. In the current era of ongoing tremendous developments in colorectal cancer diagnosis and treatment, this uncommon case reminds us that locally advanced CRC is still a challenge to manage. Precision medicine with treatment strategies tailored to an individual's genetic, environmental and lifestyle factors is the current need.

Patient-Derived Organoids from Colorectal Cancer with Paired Liver Metastasis Reveal Tumor Heterogeneity and Predict Response to Chemotherapy

There is no effective method to predict chemotherapy response and postoperative prognosis of colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) patients. Patient-derived organoid (PDO) has become an important preclinical model. Herein, a living biobank with 50 CRLM organoids derived from primary tumors and paired liver metastatic lesions is successfully constructed. CRLM PDOs from the multiomics levels (histopathology, genome, transcriptome and single-cell sequencing) are comprehensively analyzed and confirmed that this organoid platform for CRLM could capture intra- and interpatient heterogeneity. The chemosensitivity data in vitro reveal the potential value of clinical application for PDOs to predict chemotherapy response (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI) and clinical prognosis of CRLM patients. Taken together, CRLM PDOs can be utilized to deliver a potential application for personalized medicine.

Clinical outcomes of targeted therapies in elderly patients aged ≥ 80 years with metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy combined with oxaliplatin or irinotecan is usually used in colorectal cancer (CRC). The addition of a targeted agent (TA) to this combination chemotherapy is currently the standard treatment for metastatic CRC. However, the efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy for metastatic CRC in patients aged above 80 years has yet to be established.

AIM

To assess the clinical outcomes and feasibility of combination chemotherapy using a TA in extremely elderly patients with CRC.

METHODS

Eligibility criteria were: (1) Age above 80 years; (2) Metastatic colorectal cancer; (3) Palliative chemotherapy naïve; (4) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1; and (5) Adequate organ function. Patients received at least one dose of combination chemotherapy with or without TA. Response was evaluated every 8 wk.

RESULTS

Of 30 patients, the median age of 15 patients treated with TA was 83.0 years and that of those without TA was 81.3 years. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients treated with TA were 7.4 mo and 15.4 mo, respectively, compared with 4.4 mo and 15.6 mo, respectively, in patients treated without TA. There was no significant difference in PFS (P: 0.193) and OS (P: 0.748) between patients treated with and without TA. Common grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were anemia (16.7%) and neutropenia (10.0%). After disease progression, the median OS of patients who were treated with and without salvage chemotherapy were 23.5 mo and 7.0 mo, respectively, suggesting significant difference in OS (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Combination chemotherapy with TA for metastatic CRC may be considered feasible in patients aged above 80 years, when with careful caution. Salvage chemotherapy can help improve OS in some selected of these elderly patients.

Impact of Preoperative Chemotherapy Features on Patient Outcomes after Hepatectomy for Initially Unresectable Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: A LiverMetSurvey Analysis

Background: Prognostic factors have been extensively reported after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM); however, specific analyses of the impact of preoperative systemic anticancer therapy (PO-SACT) features on outcomes is lacking. Methods: For this real-world evidence study, we used prospectively collected data within the international surgical LiverMetSurvey database from all patients with initially-irresectable CLM. The main outcome was Overall Survival (OS) after surgery. Disease-free (DFS) and hepatic-specific relapse-free survival (HS-RFS) were secondary outcomes. PO-SACT features included duration (cumulative number of cycles), choice of the cytotoxic backbone (oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based), fluoropyrimidine (infusional or oral) and addition or not of targeted monoclonal antibodies (anti-EGFR or anti-VEGF). Results: A total of 2793 patients in the database had received PO-SACT for initially irresectable diseases. Short (<7 or <13 cycles in 1st or 2nd line) PO-SACT duration was independently associated with longer OS (HR: 0.85 p = 0.046), DFS (HR: 0.81; p = 0.016) and HS-RFS (HR: 0.80; p = 0.05). All other PO-SACT features yielded basically comparable results. Conclusions: In this international cohort, provided that PO-SACT allowed conversion to resectability in initially irresectable CLM, surgery performed as soon as technically feasible resulted in the best outcomes. When resection was achieved, our findings indicate that the choice of PO-SACT regimen had a marginal if any, impact on outcomes.

Prophylactic surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC CO2) versus standard surgery in colorectal carcinoma at high risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis: short-term and long-term outcomes from the CHECK study - protocol for a randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial

INTRODUCTION

Up to one-fifth of patients with colorectal cancer will develop peritoneal metastases, frequently without other districts' involvement. Despite the recent unsuccesses of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases treatment, the rationale in the prophylactic setting remains strong. Several clinical and pharmacokinetic data suggest that the efficacy of intraperitoneal chemotherapy is highest when the disease is microscopic. However, robust evidence demonstrating whether the addition of HIPEC for high-risk colorectal cancers offers better control of local recurrence is lacking.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a multicentre randomised phase 3 trial comparing prophylactic surgery plus HIPEC CO2 with mitomycin, over standard surgical excision in patients with colorectal cancer at high risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis; 388 patients will be included in this study. The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of prophylactic surgery (radical colorectal resection, omentectomy, appendectomy, round ligament of the liver resection and bilateral adnexectomy) plus HIPEC CO2 with mitomycin and standard surgery in terms of local recurrence-free survival. The main secondary endpoints are disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. The primary endpoint will be described with a cumulative incidence function and will be analysed with Grey test to take account of the competing risks. DFS and OS will be described with the Kaplan-Meier method.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This trial has been evaluated by the Italian Medicines Agency, local ethics committees and will be submitted to the Ministry of Health to notify the start of the trial according to the regulation of trials on devices with CE mark/certification.The results will be submitted for presentation at academic meetings and for publication in a peer-reviewed journal, whatever the findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03914820.

Zebrafish Patient-Derived Xenograft Model to Predict Treatment Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer Patients

The use of zebrafish embryos for personalized medicine has become increasingly popular. We present a co-clinical trial aiming to evaluate the use of zPDX (zebrafish Patient-Derived Xenografts) in predicting the response to chemotherapy regimens used for colorectal cancer patients. zPDXs are generated by xenografting tumor tissues in two days post-fertilization zebrafish embryos. zPDXs were exposed to chemotherapy regimens (5-FU, FOLFIRI, FOLFOX, FOLFOXIRI) for 48 h. We used a linear mixed effect model to evaluate the zPDX-specific response to treatments showing for 4/36 zPDXs (11%), a statistically significant reduction of tumor size compared to controls. We used the RECIST criteria to compare the outcome of each patient after chemotherapy with the objective response of its own zPDX model. Of the 36 patients enrolled, 8 metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), response rate after first-line therapy, and the zPDX chemosensitivity profile were available. Of eight mCRC patients, five achieved a partial response and three had a stable disease. In 6/8 (75%) we registered a concordance between the response of the patient and the outcomes reported in the corresponding zPDX. Our results provide evidence that the zPDX model can reflect the outcome in mCRC patients, opening a new frontier to personalized medicine.

LINC00022 acts as an oncogene in colorectal cancer progression via sponging miR-375-3p to regulate FOXF1 expression

Background

Abnormal expression of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) has been shown to be associated with the pathogenesis of cancers, including colorectal cancer (CRC). It has been reported that LINC00022 is highly expressed in some typs of cancer and its overexpression indicates poor prognosis. The function of LINC00022 in CRC progression remains unclear and is mainly investigated in the present study.

Methods

LINC00022 expression in CRC tissues was analyzed by using the TNMplot software. LINC00022 expression in CRC cells was measured by quantitative real-time PCR. The effects of LINC00022 on the malignant behaviors of CRC cells were detected by a series of in vitro and in vivo experiments. Dual-luciferase assays were used to verify the targeting relationship between LINC00022 and miR-375-3p and between miR-375-3p and Forkhead box F1 (FOXF1), followed by the rescue experiment.

Results

LINC00022 was highly expressed in CRC tissues compared with paired para-carcinoma tissues (n = 41). CRC cells with LINC00022 knockdown exhibited decreased cell proliferation, migration, and invasion abilities but increased apoptosis accompanied by decreased protein levels of c-Myc, cyclin D1, cleaved caspase 3, cleaved poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) 2, and MMP9. Additionally, LINC00022 downregulation in CRC cells suppressed the tube formation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) as evidenced by decreased vascular endothelial growth factor A levels in LINC00022-silenced cells. The inhibitory effect of LINC00022 knockdown on tumor growth was also observed in an in vivo model. Conversely, LINC00022 overexpression showed that opposite effect. We further demonsrtaed that LINC00022 could upregulate FOXF1 expression through sponging miR-375-3p. Moreover, miR-375-3p knockdown reversed the effects of LINC00022 down-regulation.

Conclusions

LINC00022 may up-regulate FOXF1 expression via competitively binding miR-375-3p, thereby promoting the development of CRC.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09566-5.

KLF5 inhibition overcomes oxaliplatin resistance in patient-derived colorectal cancer organoids by restoring apoptotic response

Oxaliplatin resistance is a major challenge in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC). Many molecular targeted drugs for refractory CRC have been developed to solve CRC drug resistance, but their effectiveness and roles in the progression of CRC and oxaliplatin resistance remain unclear. Here, we successfully constructed CRC PDOs and selected the Kruppel-like factor 5 (KLF5) inhibitor ML264 as the research object based on the results of the in vitro drug screening assay. ML264 significantly restored oxaliplatin sensitivity in CRC PDOs by restoring the apoptotic response, and this effect was achieved by inhibiting the KLF5/Bcl-2/caspase3 signaling pathway. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and luciferase reporter assays verified that KLF5 promoted the transcription of Bcl-2 in CRC cells. KLF5 inhibition also overcame oxaliplatin resistance in xenograft tumors. Taken together, our study demonstrated that ML264 can restore oxaliplatin sensitivity in CRC PDOs by restoring the apoptotic response. KLF5 may be a potential therapeutic target for oxaliplatin-resistant CRC. PDOs have a strong potential for evaluating inhibitors and drug combination therapy in a preclinical environment.

Minimizing the risk of small-for-size syndrome after liver surgery

BACKGROUND

Primary and secondary liver tumors are not always amenable to resection due to location and size. Inadequate future liver remnant (FLR) may prevent patients from having a curative resection or may result in increased postoperative morbidity and mortality from complications related to small-for-size syndrome (SFSS).

DATA SOURCES

This comprehensive review analyzed the principles, mechanism and risk factors associated with SFSS and presented current available options in the evaluation of FLR when planning liver surgery. In addition, it provided a detailed description of specific modalities that can be used before, during or after surgery, in order to optimize the conditions for a safe resection and minimize the risk of SFSS.

RESULTS

Several methods which aim to reduce tumor burden, preserve healthy liver parenchyma, induce hypertrophy of FLR or prevent postoperative complications help minimize the risk of SFSS.

CONCLUSIONS

With those techniques the indications of radical treatment for patients with liver tumors have significantly expanded. The successful outcome depends on appropriate patient selection, the individualization and modification of interventions and the right timing of surgery.

Efficacy of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer ≥ 70 years

PURPOSE

Colorectal cancer (CRC) affects many older adults. We investigated the efficacy and safety of adding anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) agents to doublet chemotherapy (DC) in older patients.

METHODS

Patients with RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic CRC (mCRC) receiving first-line DC + anti-EGFR (n = 1191) or DC alone (n = 729) from seven trials in the Aide de Recherche en Cancerologie Digestive database were included. The prognostic and predictive effects of age were investigated. Progression-free and overall survival (OS) were evaluated between age groups (≥70 vs <70) for DC + anti-EGFR. In addition, outcomes were compared between DC+/-anti-EGFR within age groups in three trials with a DC alone arm. Subsequently, the same analysis was conducted for left-sided tumours. Adverse events grade ≥3 (G3+) were compared between age groups.

RESULTS

Older (vs younger) patients receiving DC + anti-EGFR had similar progression-free survival (PFS) (8.7 vs 10.3 months; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.20 [0.96-1.49];p = 0.107) but inferior OS (21.3 vs 26.3; HR = 1.36 [1.08-1.72];p = 0.011). DC + anti-EGFR (vs DC alone) improved OS (23.9 vs 20.3; HR = 0.82 [0.70-0.95];p = 0.008) and PFS (11.2 vs 8.9; HR = 0.70 [0.60-0.82];p < 0.001) in younger but not older patients: OS (24.7 vs 17.6; HR [95% confidence interval {CI}] = 0.77 [0.58-1.04];p = 0.092) and PFS (9.1 vs 8.7; HR [95% CI] = 0.85[0.63-1.15];p = 0.287). In left-sided 'only' tumours, the following outcomes for older (vs younger) patients were observed. For DC + anti-EGFR, PFS 9 versus 11.2 months; HR1.10 (95% CI 0.83-1.46); p = 0.52, OS 25.6 vs 30.3 HR 1.32 (95% CI 0.97-1.79), p = 0.086. For DC + anti-EGFR (vs DC alone), PFS and OS for younger patients were 11.9 vs 9.2 months HR 0.60 (95% CI 0.47-0.78) p < 0.001 and 24.1 versus 23.3 months HR 0.84 (95% CI 0.67-1.04), respectively. For older patients, PFS and OS were 13.1 versus 8.5 months, HR 0.51 (95% CI, 0.28-0.93), P = 0.027 and 26.3 versus 16.5 months HR 0.49 (95% CI, 0.28-0.85), respectively. There was no significant difference in toxicity among different age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Older (vs younger) patients with mCRC RAS WT patients had comparable toxicity and efficacy with the addition of anti-EGFR agents to chemotherapy.

Resource Oriented Decision Making for Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) in a Lower-Middle Income Country: Egyptian Foundation of Medical Sciences (EFMS) Consensus Recommendations 2020

PURPOSE

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide and the second cause of cancer related mortality. Treatment options for patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) expanded during the last two decades, with introduction of new chemotherapeutic and targeted agents. Egypt is a lower middle-income country; Egyptian health care system is fragmented with wide diversity in drug availability and reimbursement policies across different health care providing facilities. We report the results of consensus recommendations for treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer developed by Egyptian Foundation of Medical Sciences (EFMS), aiming to harmonize clinical practice through structured expert consensus-based recommendations consistent with the national status. EFMS recommendations could be utilized in other countries with similar economic status.

METHODS

EFMS recommendations were developed using a modified Delphi process, with three rounds of voting till the final recommendations were approved. A non-systematic review of literature was conducted before generating the provisional statements. Content experts were asked to vote on some recommendations in two different resource groups (restricted resources and non-restricted resources). External review board of experts from a low income and lower-middle countries voted on the applicability of EFMS recommendations in their countries.

RESULTS

The current recommendations highlighted the discrepancy in health care between restricted and non-restricted resources with expected survival loss and quality of life deterioration. Access to targeted agents in first line is very limited in governmental institutions, and no access to agents approved for third line in patients who failed oxaliplatin and irinotecan containing regimens for patients treated in restricted resource settings.

CONCLUSION

Management of mCRC in developing countries is a challenge. The currently available resource-stratified guidelines developed by international cancer societies represent a valuable decision-making tool, adaptation to national status in each country based on healthcare system status is required.

FOLFIRI (folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan) increases not efficacy but toxicity compared with single-agent irinotecan as a second-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a randomized clinical trial

Background:

FOLFIRI [irinotecan, folinic acid (CF), and fluorouracil] is considered a standard second-line chemotherapy regimen for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who failed first-line XELOX/FOLFOX regimens. However, it remains unknown whether fluorouracil is still necessary in this case. This trial was designed to test the superiority of FOLFIRI over single-agent irinotecan as a second-line treatment for patients with mCRC.

Methods:

This randomized clinical trial was conducted in five hospitals in China. From 4 November 2016 to 17 January 2020, patients aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed unresectable mCRC and who had failed first-line XELOX/FOLFOX regimens were screened and enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive either FOLFIRI or irinotecan. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and toxicity. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis.

Results:

A total of 172 patients with mCRC were randomly treated with FOLFIRI (n = 88) or irinotecan (n = 84). The median PFS was 104 and 112 days (3.5 and 3.7 months) in the FOLFIRI and irinotecan groups, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.084, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.7911–1.485; p = 0.6094], and there was also no significant difference in OS and ORR between the two groups. The incidence of the following adverse events (AEs) was significantly higher in the FOLFIRI group than in the irinotecan group: any grade AEs including leucopenia (73.9% versus 55.4%), neutropenia (72.7% versus 56.6%), thrombocytopenia (31.8% versus 18.1%), jaundice (18.2% versus 7.2%), mucositis (40.9% versus 14.5%), vomiting (37.5% versus 21.7%), and fever (19.3% versus 7.2%) and grade 3–4 neutropenia (47.7% versus 21.7%).

Conclusion:

This is the first head-to-head trial showing that single-agent irinotecan yielded PFS, OS, and ORR similar to FOLFIRI, with a more favorable toxicity profile; therefore, it might be a more favorable standard chemotherapy regimen for mCRC patients who failed first-line XELOX/FOLFOX regimens.

Trial registration:

This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02935764, registered 17 October 2016, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02935764.

OUP accepted manuscript

Background

In the past decade, several successful clinical trials provided new therapeutic agents approved for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This study evaluated whether these practice-changing results actually altered the clinical practice.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of treatment-naive AGC patients who received combination chemotherapy of fluoropyrimidine and platinum between 2007 and 2018 and divided them into three groups: Groups A (2007-10), B (2011-14), and C (2015-2018), respectively. We compared the clinicopathological features, treatment details, and clinical outcomes among the three groups.

Results

In total, 1004 consecutive patients were enrolled (A; n = 254, B; n = 300, and C; n = 450). The number of patients with poor performance status, older age, esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma, and primary tumor increased during the study period. All groups had similar median overall survival (OS); ~16 months) without any statistical difference but steady prolongation of survival was observed in the adjusted with imbalance prognostic factors among groups (B/A; hazard ratio, HR 0.82, 95% C.I 0.68-0.98, C/A; HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60-0.86); OS of HER2-positive AGC patients was clearly improved (HER2-positive vs HER2-negative in Group B, HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.60-1.06; Group C, HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51-0.90) but that of diffuse-type AGC patients remained dismal.

Conclusions

The increasing availability of chemotherapy options potentially contributed to improved survival of AGC patients, but expanded chemotherapeutic indications made the survival benefit inconspicuous in the whole population. Future therapeutic development for the AGC subset not adequately receiving benefit from previous clinical trials is warranted.

The Orexin receptors: Structural and anti-tumoral properties

At the end of the 20th century, two new neuropeptides (Orexin-A/hypocretin-1 and Orexin-B/hypocretins-2) expressed in hypothalamus as a prepro-orexins precursor, were discovered. These two neuropeptides interacted with two G protein-coupled receptor isoforms named OX1R and OX2R. The orexins/OX receptors system play an important role in the central and peripheral nervous system where it controls wakefulness, addiction, reward seeking, stress, motivation, memory, energy homeostasis, food intake, blood pressure, hormone secretions, reproduction, gut motility and lipolysis. Orexins and their receptors are involved in pathologies including narcolepsy type I, neuro- and chronic inflammation, neurodegenerative diseases, metabolic syndrome, and cancers. Associated with these physiopathological roles, the extensive development of pharmacological molecules including OXR antagonists, has emerged in association with the determination of the structural properties of orexins and their receptors. Moreover, the identification of OX1R expression in digestive cancers encompassing colon, pancreas and liver cancers and its ability to trigger mitochondrial apoptosis in tumoral cells, indicate a new putative therapeutical action of orexins and paradoxically OXR antagonists. The present review focuses on structural and anti-tumoral aspects of orexins and their receptors.

The price of curing cancer

Background

Health care systems around the world struggle with high prices for new cancer drugs. The purpose of this study was to conduct a gedankenexperiment and calculate how much health expenditures would change if a cure for cancer through pharmaceutical treatment were made available. The cancer cure was conceived to eliminate both cancer deaths and the underlying morbidity burden of cancer. Furthermore, the cure was hypothesized to arrive in incremental steps but at infinitesimally small time intervals (resulting, effectively, in an immediate cure).

Methods

The analysis used secondary data and was conducted from the viewpoint of the German social health insurance. As its underlying method, it used a cause-elimination life-table approach. To account for the age distribution of the population, the study weighted age-specific increases in remaining life expectancy by age-specific population sizes. It considered drug acquisition costs as well as savings and life extension costs from eliminating cancer. All cancer drugs that underwent a mandatory early benefit assessment in Germany between 2011 and 2015/16 and were granted an added benefit were included. Data on age- and gender-specific probabilities of survival, population sizes, causes of death, and health expenditures, as well as data on cancer costs were taken from the German Federal Office of Statistics and the German Federal Social Insurance Office.

Results

Based on the cause-elimination life-table approach and accounting for the age structure of the German population, curing cancer in Germany yields an increase in average remaining life expectancy by 2.66 life years. Based on the current incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of new cancer drugs, which is on average €101,493 per life year gained (€39,751/0.39 life years), the German social health insurance would need to pay €280,497 per insuree to eliminate cancer. Dividing this figure by current average remaining lifetime health expenditures yields a ratio of 2.07, which represents a multiplier of current health expenditures.

Conclusions

Eliminating cancer at current price levels would more than triple total health expenditures in Germany. As the current price of a cure requires a drastic reduction of non-health consumption, it appears that current prices for cancer drugs already on the market (i.e., small steps towards a cure) need careful reconsideration.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07327-x.

Survival Advantage of Yttrium-90 Radioembolization to Systemic Therapy in Patients with Hepatic Metastases from Colorectal Cancer in the Salvage Setting: Results of a Matched Pair Study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer have a poor prognosis in the salvage setting. This study assessed the survival benefit of adding transarterial ⁹⁰Y radioembolization in the salvage setting to systemic therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective, matched-pair study, 21 patients who underwent radioembolization plus systemic therapy were matched with a cohort of 173 patients who received systemic chemotherapy alone in the salvage setting, defined as progression on at least two different regimens of systemic chemotherapy. Patients were matched one-to-one on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, presence of extrahepatic disease, and presence of tumor KRAS mutation. Radioembolization patients underwent treatment using standard dosimetry to either a hepatic lobe or the whole liver. Survival data was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent radioembolization plus systemic therapy vs. those who had systemic therapy alone had similar demographics and exposure to prior systemic chemotherapies. Median survival from the date of primary diagnosis was 38 (95% CI 26 to 50) v 25 (95% CI 15 to 35) months in radioembolization with systemic therapy vs. systemic therapy alone (p = 0.17). Median survival from the date of hepatic metastases was 31 (95% CI 23.8 to 38.2) v 20 months (95% CI 10.2 to 29.8) in radioembolization with systemic therapy vs. systemic therapy alone (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

The addition of radioembolization to systemic therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver may improve survival in the salvage setting.

Association between Fusobacterium nucleatum and patient prognosis in metastatic colon cancer

Recent evidence suggests that Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn) is associated with the development and progression of colorectal cancer. We aimed to delineate the clinical implications of Fn in metastatic colon cancer. We performed quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) using DNA samples from synchronous metastatic colon cancer patients with either formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) archival primary site tumor samples or fresh colon tissues. Progression-free survival (PFS)1 and PFS2 were defined as PFS of first- and second-line palliative settings. qPCR for Fn was successfully performed using 112 samples (FFPE, n = 61; fresh tissue, n = 51). Forty-one and 68 patients had right-sided and left-sided colon cancer, respectively. Patients with Fn enriched right-sided colon cancers had shorter PFS1 (9.7 vs. 11.2 months) than the other subgroups (HR 3.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05–11.99; P = 0.04). Fn positive right-sided colon was also associated with shorter PFS2 (3.7 vs. 6.7 months; HR 2.34, 95% CI 0.69–7.91; P = 0.04). In the univariate analysis, PFS1 was affected by differentiation and Fn positive right-sided colon cancer. The multivariate analysis showed that differentiation (HR 2.68, 95% CI 1.40–5.14, P = 0.01) and Fn positive right-sided colon (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.18–0.88, P = 0.02) were associated with PFS1. Fn enrichment in right sided colon was not associated with overall survival (OS). Fn enrichment has significantly worse prognosis in terms of PFS1 and PFS2 in patients with right-sided metastatic colon cancers.

Prognostic Prediction Models for Liver Metastasis and Overall Survival in Colorectal Cancer Patients

Objective

The objective of this study was to develop novel prediction models for liver metastasis-free survival (LMFS) and overall survival (OS) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients following surgically curative resections. We developed novel prediction models for LMFS and OS in CRC patients following surgically curative resections. Using clinicopathologic factors, such models were constructed with concordance indices of 0.811 and 0.776 for LMFS and OS, respectively.

Methods

Seven hundred seventy-six CRC patients presenting to the Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases between January 2004 and December 2010 were retrospectively studied. The exclusion criteria were patients with preoperative treatment, synchronous distant metastasis, noncurative resection, and incomplete postoperative follow-up.

Results

Based on the analysis of clinicopathologic factors, the following factors had significant correlation with LMFS: preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (pre-CEA), tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, lymphatic invasion, and venous invasion. Using these variables, a novel prediction model was constructed by the Cox regression model with a concordance index (c-index) of 0.811 for LMFS. The following factors had a significant correlation with OS: age, pre-CEA, preoperative serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9, tumor location, pathologically defined tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, and venous invasion. Using these variables, a prediction model was constructed with a c-index of 0.776 for OS. These models were validated by external datasets in an independent patient group.

Conclusions

We demonstrated the utility of a novel personalized prognostic model for liver metastasis, integrating tumor node metastasis factors, pre-CEA, and histologic lymphovascular invasion to predict the prognosis. Such models can help clinicians in treating CRC patients postoperatively.

Orexins/Hypocretins and Cancer: A Neuropeptide as Emerging Target

Over 20 years ago, orexin neuropeptides (Orexin-A/hypocretin-1 and Orexin-B/hypocretins-2) produced from the same precursor in hypothalamus were identified. These two neurotransmitters and their receptors (OX1R and OX1R), present in the central and peripheral nervous system, play a major role in wakefulness but also in drug addiction, food consumption, homeostasis, hormone secretion, reproductive function, lipolysis and blood pressure regulation. With respect to these biological functions, orexins were involved in various pathologies encompassing narcolepsy, neurodegenerative diseases, chronic inflammations, metabolic syndrome and cancers. The expression of OX1R in various cancers including colon, pancreas and prostate cancers associated with its ability to induce a proapoptotic activity in tumor cells, suggested that the orexins/OX1R system could have a promising therapeutic role. The present review summarizes the relationship between cancers and orexins/OX1R system as an emerging target.

Treatment of Patients With Late-Stage Colorectal Cancer: ASCO Resource-Stratified Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide expert guidance to clinicians and policymakers in resource-constrained settings on the management of patients with late-stage colorectal cancer.

METHODS

ASCO convened a multidisciplinary, multinational Expert Panel that reviewed existing guidelines, conducted a modified ADAPTE process, and used a formal consensus process with additional experts for two rounds of formal ratings.

RESULTS

Existing sets of guidelines from four guideline developers were identified and reviewed; adapted recommendations from five guidelines form the evidence base and provided evidence to inform the formal consensus process, which resulted in agreement of ≥ 75% on all recommendations.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Common elements of symptom management include addressing clinically acute situations. Diagnosis should involve the primary tumor and, in some cases, endoscopy, and staging should involve digital rectal exam and/or imaging, depending on resources available. Most patients receive treatment with chemotherapy, where chemotherapy is available. If, after a period of chemotherapy, patients become candidates for surgical resection with curative intent of both primary tumor and liver or lung metastatic lesions on the basis of evaluation in multidisciplinary tumor boards, the guidelines recommend patients undergo surgery in centers of expertise if possible. On-treatment surveillance includes a combination of taking medical history, performing physical examinations, blood work, and imaging; specifics, including frequency, depend on resource-based setting.

Additional information is available at www.asco.org/resource-stratified-guidelines.

Preference criteria for regorafenib in treating refractory metastatic colorectal cancer are the small tumor burden, slow growth and poor/scanty spread

Given the unclear preference criteria for regorafenib in treating refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), this study aimed to construct an algorithm in selecting right patients for regorafenib. This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Patients with pathology confirmed mCRC and administered with regorafenib for > 3 weeks were enrolled. Patients with good response were defined to have progression-free survival (PFS) of ≥ 4 months. The Kaplan–Meier plot was used to analyze survival. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze univariate and multivariate prognostic factors and was visualized using forest plot. A clustering heatmap was used to classify patients according to responses. The decision tree and nomogram were used to construct the approaching algorithm. A total of 613 patients was analyzed. The median PFS and overall survival (OS) were 2.7 and 10.6 months, respectively. The partial response and stable disease rate are 2.4% and 36.4%. The interval between metastasis (M1) and regorafenib, metastatic status (number, liver, and brain), and CEA level were independent prognostics factors of PFS that classifies patients into three groups: good, bad and modest-1/modest-2 group with PFS >  = 4 months rates of 51%, 20%, 39% and 30%, respectively. Results were used to develop the decision tree and nomogram for approaching patients indicated with regorafenib. The preference criteria for regorafenib in treating patients with refractory mCRC are small tumor burden (CEA), slow growth (interval between metastasis and regorafenib) and poor/scanty spread (metastatic status: number and sites of metastasis): The 3S rules.

TRIAL registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03829852; Date of first registration (February 11, 2019).

Evidence-Based Second-Line Treatment in RAS Wild-Type/Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the Precision Medicine Era

Target-oriented agents improve metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) survival in combination with chemotherapy. However, the majority of patients experience disease progression after first-line treatment and are eligible for second-line approaches. In such a context, antiangiogenic and anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) agents as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved as second-line options, and RAS and BRAF mutations and microsatellite status represent the molecular drivers that guide therapeutic choices. Patients harboring K- and N-RAS mutations are not eligible for anti-EGFR treatments, and bevacizumab is the only antiangiogenic agent that improves survival in combination with chemotherapy in first-line, regardless of RAS mutational status. Thus, the choice of an appropriate therapy after the progression to a bevacizumab or an EGFR-based first-line treatment should be evaluated according to the patient and disease characteristics and treatment aims. The continuation of bevacizumab beyond progression or its substitution with another anti-angiogenic agents has been shown to increase survival, whereas anti-EGFR monoclonals represent an option in RAS wild-type patients. In addition, specific molecular subgroups, such as BRAF-mutated and Microsatellite Instability-High (MSI-H) mCRCs represent aggressive malignancies that are poorly responsive to standard therapies and deserve targeted approaches. This review provides a critical overview about the state of the art in mCRC second-line treatment and discusses sequential strategies according to key molecular biomarkers.

Accuracy of Using a Patient-Derived Tumor Organoid Culture Model to Predict the Response to Chemotherapy Regimens In Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: A Blinded Study

BACKGROUND

Patient-derived tumor organoid culture has emerged as a preclinical model that has the potential to predict individual drug response. However, the predictive accuracy of patient-derived tumor organoid culture models for responses to chemotherapy regimens in stage IV colorectal cancer remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the patient-derived tumor organoid culture model for responses to chemotherapy regimens in stage IV colorectal cancer.

DESIGN

A pilot study was performed to define the half-maximal inhibitory concentration of the response to chemotherapy regimens in the patient-derived tumor organoid culture model. Then, a blinded study was performed to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the patient-derived tumor organoid culture model for responses to chemotherapy regimens.

SETTINGS

Cancer samples were collected from patients with stage IV colorectal cancer at Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University in China.

PATIENTS

In the pilot study, 30 patients were enrolled, and 43 samples were collected. In the blinded study, 71 patients were enrolled, and 96 samples were collected.

INTERVENTION

Patient-derived tumor organoid culture and chemotherapy regimens were tested.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The predictive accuracy of the patient-derived tumor organoid model for responses to chemotherapy regimens was measured.

RESULTS

The median (range) time of organoid culture and drug testing was 9 days (range, 7-14 d). In the pilot study, 30 samples (69.77% [30/43]) were successfully cultured. The half-maximal inhibitory concentration of the chemotherapy response was 10 µmol/L according to clinical chemotherapy outcomes. In the blinded study, 77 samples (80.21% [77/96]) from 57 patients were successfully cultured. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the patient-derived tumor organoid model for predicting responses to chemotherapy regimens were 63.33%, 94.12%, and 79.69%.

LIMITATIONS

This was a blinded study rather than a prospective randomized controlled study.

CONCLUSIONS

The patient-derived tumor organoid culture model effectively predicts responses to existing chemotherapy regimens for individual patients. Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B511.

PRECISIN EN EL USO DE MODELOS DE CULTIVO DE ORGANOIDES TUMORALES DERIVADOS DE PACIENTES PARA PREDECIR LA RESPUESTA DEL RGIMEN DE QUIMIOTERAPIA EN CNCER COLORRECTAL ESTADIO IV ESTUDIO CIEGO

ANTECEDENTES:El cultivo de organoides tumorales derivado del paciente ha surgido como un modelo preclínico que tiene el potencial de predecir la respuesta a un fármaco individual. Sin embargo, la exactitud predictiva en los modelos de cultivo de organoides tumorales derivados de pacientes para las respuestas a los regímenes de quimioterapia en el cáncer colorrectal en estadio IV sigue siendo desconocida.OBJETIVO:Evaluar la exactitud predictiva del modelo de cultivo organoide tumoral derivado de pacientes para las respuestas a los regímenes de quimioterapia en el cáncer colorrectal en estadio IV.DISEÑO:Se realizó un estudio piloto para definir la concentración inhibitoria media máxima de la respuesta a los regímenes de quimioterapia en el modelo de cultivo organoide tumoral derivado de pacientes. Luego, se realizó un estudio ciego para evaluar la exactitud predictiva del modelo de cultivo organoide tumoral derivado de pacientes para las respuestas a los regímenes de quimioterapia.AJUSTE:Se recolectaron muestras de cáncer de pacientes con cáncer colorrectal en estadio IV en el Hospital Nanfang de la Universidad Médica del Sur en China.PACIENTES:En el estudio piloto, se inscribieron 30 pacientes y se recolectaron 43 muestras. En el estudio ciego, se inscribieron 71 pacientes y se recolectaron 96 muestras.INTERVENCIÓN:Se probaron cultivos de organoides de tumores derivados del paciente y regímenes de quimioterapia.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:La precisión predictiva del modelo organoide tumoral derivado del paciente para las respuestas a los regímenes de quimioterapia.RESULTADOS:La mediana (rango) de tiempo de cultivo organoide y prueba de drogas fue de 9 (7-14) días. En el estudio piloto, se cultivaron con éxito 30 (69,77% [30/43]) muestras. La concentración inhibidora media máxima de la respuesta a la quimioterapia fue de 10 µmol / L según los resultados de la quimioterapia clínica. En el estudio ciego, se cultivaron con éxito 77 muestras (80,21% [77/96]) de 57 pacientes. La sensibilidad, especificidad y precisión del modelo organoide tumoral derivado del paciente para predecir las respuestas a los regímenes de quimioterapia fueron 63,33%, 94,12% y 79,69%, respectivamente.LIMITACIONES:Este fue un estudio ciego en lugar de un estudio prospectivo, aleatorizado y controlado.CONCLUSIONES:El modelo de cultivo organoide tumoral derivado de pacientes predice eficazmente las respuestas a los regímenes de quimioterapia existentes para pacientes individuales. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B511.

Degradation of CCNK/CDK12 is a druggable vulnerability of colorectal cancer

Novel treatment options for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) are urgently needed to improve patient outcome. Here, we screen a library of non-characterized small molecules against a heterogeneous collection of patient-derived CRC spheroids. By prioritizing compounds with inhibitory activity in a subset of-but not all-spheroid cultures, NCT02 is identified as a candidate with minimal risk of non-specific toxicity. Mechanistically, we show that NCT02 acts as molecular glue that induces ubiquitination of cyclin K (CCNK) and proteasomal degradation of CCNK and its complex partner CDK12. Knockout of CCNK or CDK12 decreases proliferation of CRC cells in vitro and tumor growth in vivo. Interestingly, sensitivity to pharmacological CCNK/CDK12 degradation is associated with TP53 deficiency and consensus molecular subtype 4 in vitro and in patient-derived xenografts. We thus demonstrate the efficacy of targeted CCNK/CDK12 degradation for a CRC subset, highlighting the potential of drug-induced proteolysis for difficult-to-treat types of cancer.

Rigosertib elicits potent anti-tumor responses in colorectal cancer by inhibiting Ras signaling pathway

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic potency of Rigosertib (RGS) in the treatment of the myelodysplastic syndrome has been investigated previously, but little is known about its mechanisms of action.

METHODS

The present study integrates systems and molecular biology approaches to investigate the mechanisms of the anti-tumor effects of RGS, either alone or in combination with 5-FU in cellular and animal models of colorectal cancer (CRC).

RESULTS

The effects of RGS were more pronounced in dedifferentiated CRC cell types, compared to cell types that were epithelial-like. RGS inhibited cell proliferation and cell cycle progression in a cell-type specific manner, and that was dependent on the presence of mutations in KRAS, or its down-stream effectors. RGS increased both early and late apoptosis, by regulating the expression of p53, BAX and MDM2 in tumor model. We also found that RGS induced cell senescence in tumor tissues by increasing ROS generation, and impairing oxidant/anti-oxidant balance. RGS also inhibited angiogenesis and metastatic behavior of CRC cells, by regulating the expression of CD31, E-cadherin, and matrix metalloproteinases-2 and 9.

CONCLUSION

Our findings support the therapeutic potential of this potent RAS signaling inhibitor either alone or in combination with standard regimens for the management of patients with CRC.

Long Term Real-World Outcomes of Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer-A Single UK Centre Experience

In the UK, Trifluridine-tipiracil (Lonsurf) is used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer in the third-line setting, after prior exposure to fluoropyrimidine-based regimes. Current data on the real-world use of Lonsurf lack long-term follow-up data. A retrospective evaluation of patients receiving Lonsurf at our Cancer Centre in 2016-2017 was performed, all with a minimum of two-year follow-up. Fifty-six patients were included in the review. The median number of cycles of Lonsurf administered was 3. Median follow-up was 6.0 months, with all patients deceased at the time of analysis. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.2 months, and overall survival (OS) was 5.8 months. The median interval from Lonsurf discontinuation to death was two months, but seven patients received further systemic treatment and median OS gained was 12 months. Lonsurf offered a slightly better PFS but inferior OS to that of the RECOURSE trial, with PFS similar to real-world data previously presented. Interestingly, 12.5% had a PFS > 9 months, and this cohort had primarily left-sided and RAS wild-type disease. A subset received further systemic treatment on Lonsurf discontinuation with good additional OS benefit. Lonsurf may alter the course of disease for a subset of patients, and further treatment on progression can be considered in carefully selected patients.

Induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone as neoadjuvant treatment for locally recurrent rectal cancer: study protocol of a multicentre, open-label, parallel-arms, randomized controlled study (PelvEx II)

Background

A resection with clear margins (R0 resection) is the most important prognostic factor in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). However, this is achieved in only 60 per cent of patients. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the addition of induction chemotherapy to neoadjuvant chemo(re)irradiation improves the R0 resection rate in LRRC.

Methods

This multicentre, international, open-label, phase III, parallel-arms study will enrol 364 patients with resectable LRRC after previous partial or total mesorectal resection without synchronous distant metastases or recent chemo- and/or radiotherapy treatment. Patients will be randomized to receive either induction chemotherapy (three 3-week cycles of CAPOX (capecitabine, oxaliplatin), four 2-week cycles of FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin) or FOLFORI (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan)) followed by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery (experimental arm) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery alone (control arm). Tumours will be restaged using MRI and, in the experimental arm, a further cycle of CAPOX or two cycles of FOLFOX/FOLFIRI will be administered before chemoradiotherapy in case of stable or responsive disease. The radiotherapy dose will be 25 × 2.0 Gy or 28 × 1.8 Gy in radiotherapy-naive patients, and 15 × 2.0 Gy in previously irradiated patients. The concomitant chemotherapy agent will be capecitabine administered twice daily at a dose of 825 mg/m² on radiotherapy days. The primary endpoint of the study is the R0 resection rate. Secondary endpoints are long-term oncological outcomes, radiological and pathological response, toxicity, postoperative complications, costs, and quality of life.

Discussion

This trial protocol describes the PelvEx II study. PelvEx II, designed as a multicentre, open-label, phase III, parallel-arms study, is the first randomized study to compare induction chemotherapy followed by neoadjuvant chemo(re)irradiation and surgery with neoadjuvant chemo(re)irradiation and surgery alone in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer, with the aim of improving the number of R0 resections.

Prognostic value of regional lymph node involvement in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: palliative versus curative resection

Background

Approximately 20% of patients with colorectal cancer are initially diagnosed with stage IV disease. This study aims to examine the role of regional lymph node (LN) status in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with respect to clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes.

Methods

We investigated 1147 patients diagnosed with mCRC and had undergone surgical resection of the primary CRC. A total of 167 patients were placed in the LN-negative (LN−) group and another 980 in the LN-positive (LN+) group.

Results

LN+ patients exhibited a significantly higher rate of T4 tumors (p = 0.008), poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (p < 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (p < 0.001), and perineural invasion (p < 0.001) than those in the LN− group. LN− patients had a significantly higher rate of lung metastasis (p < 0.001), whereas the rate of peritoneal seeding (p < 0.001) and systemic node metastasis (p < 0.001) was both significantly higher in the LN+ group. The 5-year overall survival (OS) in the LN+ group was significantly poorer than that in the LN− group (LN− vs. LN+ 23.2% vs. 18.1%; p = 0.040). In patients with curative resection, the 5-year OS rate has no significant difference between the two groups (LN− vs. LN+ 19.5% vs. 24.3%; p = 0.890).

Conclusions

Metastatic CRC patients with LN+ who underwent primary tumor resection may present with more high-risk pathological features, more peritoneal seeding, and systemic node metastasis, but less lung metastasis than LN− patients. LN+ patients had poorer long-term outcomes compared with that in LN− patients. Nevertheless, with curative resection, LN+ patients could have similar survival outcomes as LN− patients.