The clinical regimens and cell membrane camouflaged nanodrug delivery systems in hematologic malignancies treatment

Hematologic malignancies (HMs), also referred to as hematological or blood cancers, pose significant threats to patients as they impact the blood, bone marrow, and lymphatic system. Despite significant clinical strategies using chemotherapy, radiotherapy, stem cell transplantation, targeted molecular therapy, or immunotherapy, the five-year overall survival of patients with HMs is still low. Fortunately, recent studies demonstrate that the nanodrug delivery system holds the potential to address these challenges and foster effective anti-HMs with precise treatment. In particular, cell membrane camouflaged nanodrug offers enhanced drug targeting, reduced toxicity and side effects, and/or improved immune response to HMs. This review firstly introduces the merits and demerits of clinical strategies in HMs treatment, and then summarizes the types, advantages, and disadvantages of current nanocarriers helping drug delivery in HMs treatment. Furthermore, the types, functions, and mechanisms of cell membrane fragments that help nanodrugs specifically targeted to and accumulate in HM lesions are introduced in detail. Finally, suggestions are given about their clinical translation and future designs on the surface of nanodrugs with multiple functions to improve therapeutic efficiency for cancers.

A Systematic Review of Clinical Applications of Anti-CD20 Radioimmunotherapy for Lymphoma

PURPOSE

The clinical efficacy of anti-CD20 radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is due to a combination of extracellular mechanisms involving immune-mediated cytotoxicity, and intracellular mechanisms related to inhibition of CD20 signaling and DNA damage from ionizing radiation. In 2002, the first RIT was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with indolent B-cell follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The 2 approved agents, 90 Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan (90Y-IT, Zevalin, Acrotech Biopharma) and 131 I-tositumomab (131-IT, Bexxar, GlaxoSmithKline) both target CD20. The aim of this study was to review the clinical applications and supporting clinical trial data of anti-CD20 RIT for lymphoma.

METHODS

A review of published articles and abstracts on the clinical efficacy and safety of 90Y-IT and iodine I 131 tositumomab was performed.

RESULTS

The clinical efficacy and safety of anti-CD20 RIT have been demonstrated in numerous clinical trials and case series. Agents have produced significant responses in patients with follicular NHLs and in off-label applications. Importantly, RIT has demonstrated promising findings in high-risk lymphomas and heavily pretreated and refractory patient populations. Associated toxicity profiles are noted as tolerable, acceptable, and most often reversible.

CONCLUSIONS

In the 2 decades since its approval, anti-CD20 RIT continues to demonstrate efficacy, particularly with a proportion of patients maintaining long-term remissions. The combination of prolonged efficacy, tolerability, and treatment convenience makes RIT a reasonable alternative to other systemic therapies. It is recommended that further research on RIT should focus on biomarkers of long-term response, pretargeting, and sequencing of RIT in the treatment course.

Maintenance and consolidation strategies for patients with untreated advanced follicular lymphoma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

The emergence of novel and efficient antibody maintenance approaches has provided more options for post-induction treatment of advanced follicular lymphoma (FL), and further comparisons are required to determine the most clinically beneficial regimen. The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the maintenance or consolidation strategy.

METHODS

The authors performed two independent searches in PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane library databases, Scopus, and Embase for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating maintenance or consolidation therapy in untreated FL patients. Extracted data included the clinical characteristics, treatment regimen, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse effects. They then pooled the data and used a Bayesian random-effects model to combine direct comparisons with indirect evidence.

RESULTS

The authors screened 1515 records and identified 13 eligible RCTs that assessed nine different regimens in 5681 advanced FL patients. Reconstructed individual survival data presented that obinutuzumab had the highest effect sizes and certainty of the evidence for PFS (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.79) and tolerability compared with observation. However, no benefit was observed in patients according to the OS, regardless of which regimen was taken. Considering other regimens, although an extended course of rituximab maintenance and consolidation therapies presented PFS benefits compared with standard rituximab maintenance, they were also associated with higher toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Although obinutuzumab and rituximab maintenance treatment improved PFS significantly, its clinical benefit requires further validation in larger populations. Furthermore, because few trials informed each treatment comparison, research is needed to refine the understanding of this complex and rapidly evolving treatment landscape.

The asymptomatic follicular lymphoma (AFL) trial: single-agent rituximab immunotherapy versus 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan radioimmunotherapy (RIT) for patients with new, untreated follicular lymphoma

Patients with asymptomatic follicular lymphoma (AFL) are candidates for observation or immunotherapy. Given the effectiveness of radiation therapy in FL, another option is 90Yttrium-ibritumomab tiuxetan radioimmunotherapy (RIT). We conducted a trial where untreated AFL patients were randomized to rituximab 375 mg/m2 weekly × 4 or rituximab 250 mg/m2 days 1, 8, and 0.4 mCi/kg (maximum 32 mCi) of RIT day 8. Twenty patients were enrolled before the study was halted due to unavailability of RIT. The ORR for rituximab and RIT were 90% and 80%, respectively; the CR rate at 6 months was 30% and 60%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 67 months, eight patients have progressed-three in the rituximab arm and five in the RIT arm and five have required systemic therapy. All patients remain alive. Both agents are highly active for AFL. The 1-week treatment with RIT and sparing of T-cells make combination therapy with newer agents attractive.

Recent preclinical and clinical advances in radioimmunotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is a therapy that combines a radioactive nucleotide with a monoclonal antibody (mAb). RIT enhances the therapeutic effect of mAb and reduces toxicity compared with conventional treatment. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current progress of RIT for treating non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) based on recent preclinical and clinical studies. The efficacy of RIT targeting the B-lymphocyte antigen cluster of differentiation 20 (CD20) has been demonstrated in clinical trials. Two radioimmunoconjugates targeting CD20, yttrium-90 (90Y)-ibritumomab-tiuxetan (Zevalin) and iodine-131 (131I)-tositumomab (Bexxar), have been approved in the USA Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating relapsed/refractory indolent or transformed NHL in 2002 and 2003, respectively. Although these two radioimmunoconjugates are effective and least toxic, they have not achieved popularity due to increasing access to novel therapies and the complexity of their delivery process. RIT is constantly evolving with the identification of novel targets and novel therapeutic strategies using newer radionuclides such as alpha-particle isotopes. Alpha-particles show very short path lengths and high linear energy transfer. These characteristics provide increased tumor cell-killing activities and reduced non-specific bystander responses on normal tissue. This review also discusses reviewed pre-targeted RIT (PRIT) and immuno-positron emission tomography (PET). PRIT potentially increases the dose of radionuclide delivered to tumors while toxicities to normal tissues are limited. Immuno-PET is a molecular imaging tracer that combines the high sensitivity of PET with the specific targeting capability of mAb. Immuno-PET strategies targeting CD20 and other antigens are currently being developed. The theragnostic approach by immuno-PET will be useful in monitoring the treatment response.

Prognostic relevance of clonal hematopoiesis in myeloid neoplastic transformation in patients with follicular lymphoma treated with radioimmunotherapy

While novel radioisotope therapies continue to advance cancer care, reports of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN) have generated concern. The prevalence and role of clonal hematopoiesis (CH) in this process remain to be defined. We hypothesized that: (i) CH is prevalent in relapsed follicular lymphoma and is associated with t-MN transformation, and (ii) radiation in the form of radioimmunotherapy (RIT) plays a role in clonal progression. In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated the prevalence and prognostic impact of CH on clinical outcomes in 58 heavily pre-treated follicular lymphoma patients who received RIT. Patients had been given a median of four lines of therapy before RIT. The prevalence of CH prior to RIT was 46%, while it was 67% (P=0.15) during the course of RIT and subsequent therapies in the paired samples. Fourteen (24%) patients developed t-MN. Patients with t-MN had a higher variant allele fraction (38% vs. 15%; P=0.02) and clonal complexity (P=0.03) than those without. The spectrum of CH differed from that in age-related CH, with a high prevalence of DNA damage repair and response pathway mutations, absence of spliceosome mutations, and a paucity of signaling mutations. While there were no clear clinical associations between RIT and t-MN, or overall survival, patients with t-MN had a higher mutant clonal burden, along with extensive chromosomal abnormalities (median survival, afer t-MN diagnosis, 0.9 months). The baseline prevalence of CH was high, with an increase in prevalence on exposure to RIT and subsequent therapies. The high rates of t-MN with marked clonal complexities and extensive chromosomal damage underscore the importance of better identifying and studying genotoxic stressors accentuated by therapeutic modalities.

Carrier systems of radiopharmaceuticals and the application in cancer therapy

Radiopharmaceuticals play a vital role in cancer therapy. The carrier of radiopharmaceuticals can precisely locate and guide radionuclides to the target, where radionuclides kill surrounding tumor cells. Effective application of radiopharmaceuticals depends on the selection of an appropriate carrier. Herein, different types of carriers of radiopharmaceuticals and the characteristics are briefly described. Subsequently, we review radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and their derivatives, and novel strategies of radiolabeled mAbs and their derivatives in the treatment of lymphoma and colorectal cancer. Furthermore, this review outlines radiolabeled peptides, and novel strategies of radiolabeled peptides in the treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasms, prostate cancer, and gliomas. The emphasis is given to heterodimers, bicyclic peptides, and peptide-modified nanoparticles. Last, the latest developments and applications of radiolabeled nucleic acids and small molecules in cancer therapy are discussed. Thus, this review will contribute to a better understanding of the carrier of radiopharmaceuticals and the application in cancer therapy.

Mosunetuzumab and the emerging role of T-cell-engaging therapy in follicular lymphoma

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common indolent lymphoma. Since the advent of rituximab, FL has seen a progressive improvement in patient prognosis. While chemotherapy combined with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody remains standard first-line therapy, most patients will relapse and require subsequent therapy. T-cell-redirecting therapies can be very potent and are transforming the therapeutic landscape in the relapsed and refractory (R/R) setting. T-cell-dependent bispecific antibodies, of which mosunetuzumab is the first to be approved for R/R FL, are proving to be a highly effective, 'off-the-shelf' option with manageable toxicities. This review covers approved treatments for R/R FL and focuses on preclinical and clinical data available for mosunetuzumab (Lunsumio™), with the goal of determining its role in the treatment of R/R FL.

Immunotherapy in hematologic malignancies: achievements, challenges and future prospects

The immune-cell origin of hematologic malignancies provides a unique avenue for the understanding of both the mechanisms of immune responsiveness and immune escape, which has accelerated the progress of immunotherapy. Several categories of immunotherapies have been developed and are being further evaluated in clinical trials for the treatment of blood cancers, including stem cell transplantation, immune checkpoint inhibitors, antigen-targeted antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, tumor vaccines, and adoptive cell therapies. These immunotherapies have shown the potential to induce long-term remission in refractory or relapsed patients and have led to a paradigm shift in cancer treatment with great clinical success. Different immunotherapeutic approaches have their advantages but also shortcomings that need to be addressed. To provide clinicians with timely information on these revolutionary therapeutic approaches, the comprehensive review provides historical perspectives on the applications and clinical considerations of the immunotherapy. Here, we first outline the recent advances that have been made in the understanding of the various categories of immunotherapies in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. We further discuss the specific mechanisms of action, summarize the clinical trials and outcomes of immunotherapies in hematologic malignancies, as well as the adverse effects and toxicity management and then provide novel insights into challenges and future directions.

Clinical Advances and Perspectives in Targeted Radionuclide Therapy

Targeted radionuclide therapy has become increasingly prominent as a nuclear medicine subspecialty. For many decades, treatment with radionuclides has been mainly restricted to the use of iodine-131 in thyroid disorders. Currently, radiopharmaceuticals, consisting of a radionuclide coupled to a vector that binds to a desired biological target with high specificity, are being developed. The objective is to be as selective as possible at the tumor level, while limiting the dose received at the healthy tissue level. In recent years, a better understanding of molecular mechanisms of cancer, as well as the appearance of innovative targeting agents (antibodies, peptides, and small molecules) and the availability of new radioisotopes, have enabled considerable advances in the field of vectorized internal radiotherapy with a better therapeutic efficacy, radiation safety and personalized treatments. For instance, targeting the tumor microenvironment, instead of the cancer cells, now appears particularly attractive. Several radiopharmaceuticals for therapeutic targeting have shown clinical value in several types of tumors and have been or will soon be approved and authorized for clinical use. Following their clinical and commercial success, research in that domain is particularly growing, with the clinical pipeline appearing as a promising target. This review aims to provide an overview of current research on targeting radionuclide therapy.

Theranostics in Hematooncology

In the early 2000s, major clinical trials provided evidence of a favorable outcome from antibody-mediated radioimmunotherapy for hematologic neoplasms, which then led to Food and Drug Administration approval. For instance, the theranostic armamentarium for the referring hematooncologist now includes ⁹⁰Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan for refractory low-grade follicular lymphoma or transformed B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, as well as ¹³¹I-tositumomab for rituximab-refractory follicular lymphoma. Moreover, the first interim results of the SIERRA phase III trial reported beneficial effects from the use of ¹³¹I-anti-CD45 antibodies (Iomab-B) in refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia. During the last decade, the concept of theranostics in hematooncology has been further expanded by C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4-directed molecular imaging. Beyond improved detection rates of putative sites of disease, C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4-directed PET/CT also selects candidates for radioligand therapy using β-emitting radioisotopes targeting the identical chemokine receptor on the lymphoma cell surface. Such image-piloted therapeutic strategies provided robust antilymphoma efficacy, along with desired eradication of the bone marrow niche, such as in patients with T- or B-cell lymphoma. As an integral part of the treatment plan, such radioligand therapy-mediated myeloablation also allows one to line up patients for stem cell transplantation, which leads to successful engraftment during the further treatment course. In this continuing education article, we provide an overview of the current advent of theranostics in hematooncology and highlight emerging clinical applications.

Radioimmunotherapy of Non-Hodgkin B-cell Lymphoma: An update

Systemic radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is arguably the most effective and least toxic anticancer treatment for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). In treatment-naïve patients with indolent NHL, the efficacy of a single injection of RIT compares with that of multiple cycles of combination chemotherapy. However, 20 years following the approval of the first CD20-targeting radioimmunoconjugates ⁹⁰Y-Ibritumomab-tiuxetan (Zevalin) and ¹³¹I-tositumomab (Bexxar), the number of patients referred for RIT in western countries has dramatically decreased. Notwithstanding this, the development of RIT has continued. Therapeutic targets other than CD20 have been identified, new vector molecules have been produced allowing for faster delivery of RIT to the target, and innovative radionuclides with favorable physical characteristics such as alpha emitters have been more widely available. In this article, we reviewed the current status of RIT in NHL, with particular focus on recent clinical and preclinical developments.

Follicular lymphoma: 2023 update on diagnosis and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is generally an indolent B cell lymphoproliferative disorder of transformed follicular center B cells. FL is characterized by diffuse lymphadenopathy, bone marrow involvement, and splenomegaly. Extranodal involvement is less common. Cytopenias are relatively common but constitutional symptoms of fever, night sweats, and weight loss are uncommon in the absence of transformation to diffuse large B cell lymphoma.

DIAGNOSIS

The diagnosis is based on histology from a biopsy of a lymph node or other affected tissue. Incisional biopsy is preferred over needle biopsies in order to give adequate tissue to assign grade and assess for transformation. Immunohistochemical staining is positive in virtually all cases for cell surface CD19, CD20, CD10, and monoclonal immunoglobulin, as well as cytoplasmic expression of bcl-2 protein. The overwhelming majority of cases have the characteristic t(14;18) translocation involving the IgH/bcl-2 genes.

RISK STRATIFICATION

The Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) uses five independent predictors of inferior survival: age >60 years, hemoglobin <12 g/dL, serum LDH > normal, Ann Arbor stage III/IV, number of involved nodal areas >4. The presence of 0-1, 2, and ≥3 adverse factors defines low, intermediate, and high-risk disease. There are other clinical prognostic models but the FLIPI remains the most common. Other factors such as time to relapse of less than 2 years from chemoimmunotherapy and specific gene mutations may also be useful for prognosis. Regardless of the prognostic model used, modern therapies have demonstrably improved prognosis.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

Observation continues to be appropriate for asymptomatic patients with low bulk disease and no cytopenias. There is no overall survival (OS) advantage for early treatment with either chemotherapy or single-agent rituximab. For patients needing therapy, most patients are treated with chemoimmunotherapy, which has improved overall response rates (ORR), DOR, and OS. Randomized studies have shown additional benefits for maintenance of rituximab. Lenalidomide was non-inferior to chemoimmunotherapy in a randomized front-line study and, when combined with rituximab, was superior to rituximab alone in relapsed FL. Kinase inhibitors, stem cell transplantation (SCT), and chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) are also considered for recurrent disease.

Joint EANM, SNMMI, and IAEA Enabling Guide: How to Set up a Theranostics Center

The theranostics concept using the same target for both imaging and therapy dates back to the middle of the last century, when radioactive iodine was first used to treat thyroid diseases. Since then, radioiodine has become broadly established clinically for diagnostic imaging and therapy of benign and malignant thyroid disease, worldwide. However, only since the approval of SSTR2-targeting theranostics following the NETTER-1 trial in neuroendocrine tumors, and the positive outcome of the VISION trial has theranostics gained substantial attention beyond nuclear medicine. The roll-out of radioligand therapy for treating a high-incidence tumor such as prostate cancer requires the expansion of existing and the establishment of new theranostics centers. Despite wide global variation in the regulatory, financial and medical landscapes, this guide attempts to provide valuable information to enable interested stakeholders to safely initiate and operate theranostic centers. This enabling guide does not intend to answer all possible questions, but rather to serve as an overarching framework for multiple, more detailed future initiatives. It recognizes that there are regional differences in the specifics of regulation of radiation safety, but common elements of best practice valid globally.

90Y-ibritumomab Tiuxetan in B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas: Real-world Data From the United Arab Emirates

Purpose

B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs) are significant contributors to cancer-related mortality. In this single-arm, retrospective cohort study, we aimed to examine the outcomes of a radioimmunotherapeutic modality, ⁹⁰Y-labeled ibritumomab tiuxetan (⁹⁰YIT) in B-cell NHLs.

Methods and Materials

We conducted this study based on data from the United Arab Emirates lymphoma registry. All patients with NHL subjected to ⁹⁰YIT were eligible for inclusion. The country of research lacked a national autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) center, but many ASCT-eligible patients received ⁹⁰YIT. We investigated overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS), as well as safety outcomes.

Results

Between 2004 and 2008, 54 of 111 patients with B-cell NHL received radioimmunotherapy. The therapy was applied as first-line treatment in 18 cases (33.3%) and second- or later-line treatment in 36 cases (66.7%). All patients were evaluable for response. The first-line group consisted mainly of follicular lymphoma cases, and 3 of 18 patients died (16.7%) during the follow-up (range, 22-67 months). Median OS was not reached. No progression occurred after treatment (median EFS, 36.5 months [Q₁-Q₃ range, 30.5-44 months]). The second- or later-line group consisted mainly of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cases, and 3 of 36 patients died (8.3%) during the follow-up (range, 4-68 months). Median OS was not reached. One case of progression was registered (median EFS: 33 months [Q₁-Q₃ range, 30.5-44 months]). ⁹⁰YIT had acceptable short- and long-term safety profiles.

Conclusions

The findings suggest that patients with NHL may benefit from ⁹⁰YIT as salvage treatment if ASCT is not available; however, this should be validated in randomized studies.

Time to First Subsequent Salvage Therapy in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated With Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in the Phase III INO-VATE Trial

BACKGROUND

In relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R ALL), successive salvage therapies may worsen outcomes and decrease quality of life. This post hoc analysis of the phase III INO-VATE trial investigates subsequent salvage therapies and compared the time from randomization to first subsequent salvage therapy (TST) in the inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) and standard-of-care chemotherapy (SoC) arms.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adults (aged ≥18 years) with CD22+ R/R ALL were randomized to InO (n = 164) or SoC (n = 162) treatment. We determined TST and proportion of patients receiving subsequent salvage therapies by treatment arm and for subgroups based on transplantation status and baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

In the InO versus SoC arm, a smaller proportion of patients received subsequent salvage therapy (34.1% [n = 56] vs. 56.8% [n = 92]), and TST was longer (median 19 vs. 4 months, hazard ratio 0.339, P < .0001). Similar benefits were seen with InO versus SoC irrespective of transplantation status, age, salvage phase, first remission duration, Philadelphia chromosome status, or CD22 expression. Following receipt of subsequent salvage therapy, median overall survival was 4 months, irrespective of treatment arm.

CONCLUSION

Patients in the InO versus SoC arm were less likely to receive subsequent salvage therapy, and showed a clinically meaningful extension of TST irrespective of subgroup. This suggests InO treatment leads to improved outcomes by increasing the likelihood that subsequent salvage therapies and their associated adverse impacts can be delayed or avoided.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Available in Supplementary Materials.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01564784.

Radiotheranostics in oncology: current challenges and emerging opportunities

Structural imaging remains an essential component of diagnosis, staging and response assessment in patients with cancer; however, as clinicians increasingly seek to noninvasively investigate tumour phenotypes and evaluate functional and molecular responses to therapy, theranostics - the combination of diagnostic imaging with targeted therapy - is becoming more widely implemented. The field of radiotheranostics, which is the focus of this Review, combines molecular imaging (primarily PET and SPECT) with targeted radionuclide therapy, which involves the use of small molecules, peptides and/or antibodies as carriers for therapeutic radionuclides, typically those emitting α-, β- or auger-radiation. The exponential, global expansion of radiotheranostics in oncology stems from its potential to target and eliminate tumour cells with minimal adverse effects, owing to a mechanism of action that differs distinctly from that of most other systemic therapies. Currently, an enormous opportunity exists to expand the number of patients who can benefit from this technology, to address the urgent needs of many thousands of patients across the world. In this Review, we describe the clinical experience with established radiotheranostics as well as novel areas of research and various barriers to progress.

Real World Long-term Follow-up Experience with Yttrium-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan in Previously Untreated Patients with Low-Grade Follicular Lymphoma and Marginal Zone Lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

Yttrium-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan [(90)Y-IT] is a CD20-targeted radio-immuno conjugate. Clinical trials of (90)Y-IT as a first-line stand-alone treatment in follicular lymphoma (FL) and/or marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) showed high efficacy. However, long-term survival outcomes and toxicities are not well-defined.

METHODS

We report a retrospective single-institution, multi-center study of (90)Y-IT in previously untreated low grade (LG)-FL and MZL at Mayo Clinic Cancer Center between January 2000 and October 2019. We selected patients with LG-FL and MZL who received standard-dose (90)Y-IT as a single agent in the first line setting.

RESULTS

The cohort (n = 51) consists of previously untreated LG-FL (n = 41) or MZL (n = 10). Median follow-up was 5.3 years (95% CI; 4.2, 6.2). Overall response rate (ORR) was 100% with complete response rate (CR) of 94%. Continuous CR was observed in 59% patients who had more than 2 years of follow-up. Long-term CR (>7 years) was seen in 25% of patients. Median progression free survival (mPFS) for the whole cohort was not reached (NR) (95% CI; 4.9, NR). Bulky disease was associated with shorter median PFS of 3.5 years (CI 95%; 0.8, 4.9) compared to non-bulky disease NR (CI 95%; 5.8, NR), P = .02. The incidence of grade 3 or higher thrombocytopenia, neutropenia and anemia were 47%, 37%, and 4% respectively. No therapy-related myelodysplasia or acute myeloid leukemia were observed.

CONCLUSION

Long real-life follow-up showed that single-agent (90)Y-IT is highly efficacious with durable long-term survival in previously untreated LG-FL and MZL without significant risk for secondary malignancies.

Radiotheranostic Agents in Hematological Malignancies

Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is a cancer treatment that combines radiation therapy with tumor-directed monoclonal antibodies (Abs). Although RIT had been introduced for the treatment of CD20 positive non-Hodgkin lymphoma decades ago, it never found a broad clinical application. In recent years, researchers have developed theranostic agents based on Ab fragments or small Ab mimetics such as peptides, affibodies or single-chain Abs with improved tumor-targeting capacities. Theranostics combine diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities into a single pharmaceutical agent; this dual application can be easily achieved after conjugation to radionuclides. The past decade has seen a trend to increased specificity, fastened pharmacokinetics, and personalized medicine. In this review, we discuss the different strategies introduced for the noninvasive detection and treatment of hematological malignancies by radiopharmaceuticals. We also discuss the future applications of these radiotheranostic agents.

Radiolabeled Antibodies for Cancer Imaging and Therapy

Radioimmunoconjugates consist of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) linked to a radionuclide. Radioimmunoconjugates as theranostics tools have been in development with success, particularly in hematological malignancies, leading to approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) allows for reduced toxicity compared to conventional radiation therapy and enhances the efficacy of mAbs. In addition, using radiolabeled mAbs with imaging methods provides critical information on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of therapeutic agents with direct relevance to the optimization of the dose and dosing schedule, real-time antigen quantitation, antigen heterogeneity, and dynamic antigen changes. All of these parameters are critical in predicting treatment responses and identifying patients who are most likely to benefit from treatment. Historically, RITs have been less effective in solid tumors; however, several strategies are being investigated to improve their therapeutic index, including targeting patients with minimal disease burden; using pre-targeting strategies, newer radionuclides, and improved labeling techniques; and using combined modalities and locoregional application. This review provides an overview of the radiolabeled intact antibodies currently in clinical use and those in development.

90-yttrium-ibritumomab tiuxetan as first-line treatment for follicular lymphoma: updated efficacy and safety results at an extended median follow-up of 9.6 years

Radioimmunotherapy with 90-yttrium-ibritumomab tiuxetan (90Y-IT) as first-line treatment in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) demonstrated promising results with a complete remission (CR) rate of 56% and a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 26 months, when initially analyzed after a median follow-up of 30.6 months. The aim of this long-term follow-up was to investigate whether clinical benefits were maintained and new safety signals appeared. Fifty-nine patients, aged ≥ 50 years, with FL grade 1 to 3A in stages II to IV were treated with 90Y-IT as first-line therapy. If CR without evidence of minimal residual disease (MRD), partial response or stable disease was achieved 6 months after treatment, patients were observed without further treatment. Patients with CR but persisting MRD received consolidation therapy with rituximab. The primary endpoint was the clinical response rate. Secondary endpoints were time to progression, safety, and tolerability. After a median follow-up of 9.6 years, median PFS was 3.6 years, and 8-year PFS was 38.3%. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached during the extended follow-up, and 8-year OS amounted to 69.2%. Age 65 years and above or disease progression within 24 months of treatment were significantly associated with shorter OS. An important finding was the lack of new safety signals. In particular, no increase in secondary malignancies or transformation into aggressive lymphoma was observed compared to trials with a similar follow-up. In summary, 90Y-IT as first-line treatment demonstrates a favorable safety profile and long-term clinical activity in a substantial fraction of FL patients in need of therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00772655.

Dosimetric Approaches for Radioimmunotherapy of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in Myeloablative Setting

Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is a safe and active treatment available for non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs). In particular, two monoclonal antibodies raised against CD20, that is Zevalin (⁹⁰Y-ibritumomab-tiuxetan) and Bexxar (¹³¹I-tositumomab) received FDA approval for the treatment of relapsing/refractory indolent or transformed NHLs. RIT is likely the most effective and least toxic anticancer agent in NHLs. However, its use in the clinical setting is still debated and, in case of relapse after optimized rituximab-containing regimens, the efficacy of RIT at standard dosage is suboptimal. Thus, clinical trials were based on the hypothesis that the inclusion of RIT in myeloablative conditioning would allow to obtain improved efficacy and toxicity profiles when compared to myeloablative total-body irradiation and/or high-dose chemotherapy regimens. Standard-activity RIT has a safe toxicity profile, and the utility of pretherapeutic dosimetry in this setting can be disputed. In contrast, dose-escalation clinical protocols require the assessment of radiopharmaceutical biodistribution and dosimetry before the therapeutic injection, as dose constrains for critical organs may be exceeded when RIT is administered at high activities. The aim of the present study was to review and discuss the internal dosimetry protocols that were adopted for non-standard RIT administration in the myeloablative setting before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with NHLs.

Joint EANM, SNMMI and IAEA enabling guide: how to set up a theranostics centre

The theranostics concept using the same target for both imaging and therapy dates back to the middle of the last century, when radioactive iodine was first used to treat thyroid diseases. Since then, radioiodine has become broadly established clinically for diagnostic imaging and therapy of benign and malignant thyroid disease, worldwide. However, only since the approval of SSTR2-targeting theranostics following the NETTER-1 trial in neuroendocrine tumours and the positive outcome of the VISION trial has theranostics gained substantial attention beyond nuclear medicine. The roll-out of radioligand therapy for treating a high-incidence tumour such as prostate cancer requires the expansion of existing and the establishment of new theranostics centres. Despite wide global variation in the regulatory, financial and medical landscapes, this guide attempts to provide valuable information to enable interested stakeholders to safely initiate and operate theranostics centres. This enabling guide does not intend to answer all possible questions, but rather to serve as an overarching framework for multiple, more detailed future initiatives. It recognizes that there are regional differences in the specifics of regulation of radiation safety, but common elements of best practice valid globally.

National Cancer Institute support for targeted alpha-emitter therapy

BACKGROUND

Radiopharmaceutical targeted therapy (RPT) has been studied for decades; however, recent clinical trials demonstrating efficacy have helped renewed interest in the modality.

METHODS

This article reviews National Cancer Institute (NCI)'s support of RPT through communication via workshops and interest groups, through funding extramural programs in academia and small business, and through intramural research, including preclinical and clinical studies.

RESULTS

NCI has co-organized workshops and organized interest groups on RPT and RPT dosimetry to encourage the community and facilitate rigorous preclinical and clinical studies. NCI has been supporting RPT research through various mechanisms. Research has been funded through peer-reviewed NCI Research and Program Grants (RPG) and NCI Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Development Center, which funds small business-initiated projects, some of which have led to clinical trials. The NCI Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP)'s Radiopharmaceutical Development Initiative supports RPT in NCI-funded clinical trials, including Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) expertise in imaging QA and dosimetry procedures. Preclinical targeted a-emitter therapy (TAT) research at the NCI's intramural program is ongoing, building on foundational work dating back to the 1980s. Ongoing "bench-to-bedside" efforts leverage the unique infrastructure of the National Institutes of Health's (NIH) Clinical Center.

CONCLUSION

Given the great potential of RPT, our goal is to continue to encourage its development that will generate the high-quality evidence needed to bring this multidisciplinary treatment to patients.

Radioimmunotherapy in Oncology: Overview of the Last Decade Clinical Trials

Simple Summary

Monoclonal antibody-bearing radionuclides have been under clinical investigation over the last two decades for their use in theranostic (diagnostic and therapeutic) applications in cancer. However, despite the numerous trials that have been conducted, only two radioimmunotherapies (RIT) have been approved by the FDA for the targeted therapy of hematologic tumors expressing CD20 antigens. Moreover, RIT applications for solid cancers faced major issues—such as radiotoxicity due to low antibodies penetrance requiring substantial curative dose—where new discoveries concerning antibody engineering or radionuclides are trying to overcome. Here, we performed an overview of the last 11-year clinical trials involving RIT for solid and non-solid cancers conducted either with full antibodies or antibody fragments. We discussed the low-to-moderate efficiency of RIT compared to conventional therapies and described the last advances in clinic for antibodies carriers (F(ab′)₂, Fab′, ScFv). Finally, we discussed about the complexity of RIT as a therapy and depicted both the issues and the prospects of such a strategy.

Abstract

The specific irradiation of tumors with selective radiolabeled antibodies constitutes an attractive therapeutic approach. Consequent preclinical research has been conducted by both biologists to identify pertinent targets and to select corresponding antibodies (mAb) and by radiochemists to radiolabel mAbs. These numerous preclinical investigations have ascertained the therapeutic interest of radioimmunotherapy (RIT) protocols in mice models. Here, we summarize the clinical studies that have been performed the last decade, including clinical trials (phases I, II, and III), prospective and retrospective studies, and cases series. We thereby reported 92 clinical studies. Among them, 62 concern the treatment of hematological malignancies, and 30 concern solid tumors. For hematologic diseases, the analysis was complex due to the high discrepancy of therapeutic strategies (first-line therapy, consolidation, stem cell transplantation conditioning) as well as the high variety of malignancies that were treated. The clinical studies from the last decade failed to expand anti-CD20 RIT indications but confirmed that RIT using radiolabeled anti-CD20 remains a pertinent choice for patients with relapse follicular lymphomas. For solid tumors, the positive benefit of RIT is more mitigated, apart for few malignancies that can be treated locally. Clinical trials also demonstrated the potential of some antibody formats, such as F(ab′)₂, which has already been approved by the China State FDA under the trend name Licartin®. Despite disparate results, mAb fragments are an interesting prospect for the improvement of RIT efficiency as well as for pretargeted strategies that delay the injection of radioactive treatments from the mAb ones.

Priming and Propagating Anti-tumor Immunity: Focal Hypofractionated Radiation for in Situ Vaccination and Systemic Targeted Radionuclide Theranostics for Immunomodulation of Tumor Microenvironments

Recent preclinical and clinical studies have elucidated mechanisms whereby radiation therapy influences the anti-tumor immune response. Immunogenic cell death and phenotypic changes in tumor cells surviving radiation may underlie this effect and contribute to the capacity of radiation to elicit an in situ tumor vaccine effect. In situ vaccination is a therapeutic strategy that seeks to convert a patient's own tumor into a source of enhanced antigen recognition for the purpose of augmenting a systemic anti-tumor immune response. Capitalizing on the in situ vaccine effect of radiation, several groups have demonstrated anti-tumor efficacy in preclinical models by combining radiation with immune checkpoint blockade. Local delivery of immune adjuvants and/or immune stimulatory cytokines via direct injection into the radiated tumor microenvironment may further increase the in situ vaccine capacity of radiation therapy. However, recent studies suggest that in some contexts this effect is antagonized by the presence of distant untreated sites of disease that may dampen the systemic immune response generated by in situ vaccination through a phenomenon termed concomitant immune tolerance. Concomitant immune tolerance may be overcome by delivering radiation to all sites of metastatic disease, however this is often not possible to safely achieve using external beam radiation therapy without considerable risk of lymphopenia that would negate the immune effects of in situ vaccination. For patients with widespread metastatic disease, alternative strategies may include systemic treatment with targeted radionuclide therapies alone or in combination with an external beam radiation therapy-based in situ vaccine approach.

A randomized phase II study comparing consolidation with a single dose of 90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan vs. maintenance with rituximab for two years in patients with newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma responding to R-CHOP. Long-term follow-up results

This is a randomized phase-2 trial aimed to compare consolidation vs. maintenance in untreated patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) responding to induction. 146 patients were enrolled from 25 Spanish institutions (ZAR2007; ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT00662948). Patients in PR or CR/CR[u] after R-CHOP were randomized 1:1 to ⁹⁰Y-ibritumomab-tiuxetan 0.4 mCi/kg (arm A) vs. rituximab 375 mg/m² every 8 weeks for 2 years (arm B). After a median follow-up of 10.55 years, 53 patients eventually progressed with a 10-year PFS of 50% vs. 56% for patients in arm A and B, respectively (HR = 1.42; p > 0.1). No significant differences were seen in OS (10-year OS 78% vs. 84.5%; HR = 1.39, p > .1). Patients receiving ⁹⁰Y-ibritumomab-tiuxetan showed higher incidence of second neoplasms than those in arm B (10-year cumulative incidence 18.5 vs. 2%, respectively; p = .038). In conclusion, in FL patients responding to R-CHOP, no significant differences were found between consolidation and maintenance, although with higher late toxicity for consolidation.

Combination radionuclide therapy: A new paradigm

Targeted molecular radionuclide therapy (MRT) has shown its potential for the treatment of cancers of multiple origins. A combination therapy strategy employing two or more distinct therapeutic approaches in cancer management is aimed at circumventing tumor resistance by simultaneously targeting compensatory signaling pathways or bypassing survival selection mutations acquired in response to individual monotherapies. Combination radionuclide therapy (CRT) is a newer application of the concept, utilizing a combination of radiolabeled molecular targeting agents with chemotherapy and beam radiation therapy for enhanced therapeutic index. Encouraging results are reported with chemotherapeutic agents in combination with radiolabeled targeting molecules for cancer therapy. With increasing awareness of the various survival and stress response pathways activated after radionuclide therapy, different holistic combinations of MRT agents with radiosensitizers targeting such pathways have also been explored. MRT has also been studied in combination with beam radiotherapy modalities such as external beam radiation therapy and carbon ion radiation therapy to enhance the anti-tumor response. Nanotechnology aids in CRT by bringing together multiple monotherapies on a single nanostructure platform for treating cancers in a more precise or personalized way. CRT will be a key player in managing cancers if correctly tailored to the individual patient profile. The success of CRT lies in an in-depth understanding of the radiobiological principles and pathways activated in response.

Prolonged rituximab maintenance in follicular lymphoma patients: long-term results of the SAKK 35/03 randomized trial

The Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) conducted the SAKK 35/03 randomized trial (NCT00227695) to investigate different rituximab monotherapy schedules in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL). Here, we report their long-term treatment outcome. Two-hundred and seventy FL patients were treated with 4 weekly doses of rituximab monotherapy (375 mg/m2); 165 of them, achieving at least a partial response, were randomly assigned to maintenance rituximab (375 mg/m2 every 2 months) on a short-term (4 administrations; n = 82) or a long-term (up to a maximum of 5 years; n = 83) schedule. The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS). At a median follow-up period of 10 years, median EFS was 3.4 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1-5.5) in the short-term arm and 5.3 years (95% CI, 3.5-7.5) in the long-term arm. Using the prespecified log-rank test, this difference is not statistically significant (P = .39). There also was not a statistically significant difference in progression-free survival or overall survival (OS). Median OS was 11.0 years (95% CI, 11.0-NA) in the short-term arm and was not reached in the long-term arm (P = .80). The incidence of second cancers was similar in the 2 arms (9 patients after short-term maintenance and 10 patients after long-term maintenance). No major late toxicities emerged. No significant benefit of prolonged maintenance became evident with longer follow-up. Notably, in symptomatic patients in need of immediate treatment, the 10-year OS rate was 83% (95% CI, 73-89%). These findings indicate that single-agent rituximab may be a valid first-line option for symptomatic patients with advanced FL.

Chemotherapy-Free Management of Follicular and Marginal Zone Lymphoma

Many patients with follicular (FL) or marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) are not eligible to receive immunochemotherapy due to advanced age or comorbidities. Recent innovations in the treatment of these indolent lymphomas provide options for multiple lines of chemotherapy-free management. More research is needed to determine which older patients are best served by a chemotherapy-free approach in the context of geriatric vulnerabilities. In the first line, regardless of disease burden, rituximab monotherapy can provide high rates of disease control with minimal toxicity, while judicious use of brief maintenance extends the duration of response. Radioimmunotherapy using ibritumomab tiuxetan is an effective and safe post-rituximab consolidation for older patients who have <25% bone marrow involvement. The combination of rituximab and lenalidomide, although "chemotherapy-free", does not improve tolerability over immunochemotherapy. However, studies support lower doses and shorter duration of lenalidomide exposure as a means to improve safety without materially compromising efficacy for older individuals. Extranodal MZL can often be effectively controlled with low-dose radiation therapy, and splenic MZL has excellent outcomes with rituximab monotherapy. For many patients with relapsed FL/MZL, simple retreatment with anti-CD20 antibodies will prove sufficient. Other currently available options for relapsed/refractory disease include ibritumomab tiuxetan, lenalidomide with rituximab, umbralisib as a potentially less toxic PI3K inhibitor, ibrutinib (for MZL), and tazemetostat (for FL, especially with EZH2 mutation). Emerging data with novel forms of immunotherapy (antibody-drug conjugates like polatuzumab vedotin or loncastuximab tesirine; T-cell-engaging bispecific antibodies like mosunetuzumab or epcoritamab; and chimeric antigen receptor CAR T-cells like axicabtagene ciloleucel) suggest that immune-directed approaches can produce very high and potentially durable responses in FL/MZL with limited toxicities, further obviating the need for chemotherapy.

The dual role of complement in cancers, from destroying tumors to promoting tumor development

Complement is an important branch of innate immunity; however, its biological significance goes far beyond the scope of simple nonspecific defense and involves a variety of physiological functions, including the adaptive immune response. In this review, to unravel the complex relationship between complement and tumors, we reviewed the high diversity of complement components in cancer and the heterogeneity of their production and activation pathways. In the tumor microenvironment, complement plays a dual regulatory role in the occurrence and development of tumors, affecting the outcomes of the immune response. We explored the differential expression levels of various complement components in human cancers via the Oncomine database. The gene expression profiling interactive analysis (GEPIA) tool and Kaplan-Meier plotter (K-M plotter) confirmed the correlation between differentially expressed complement genes and tumor prognosis. The tumor immune estimation resource (TIMER) database was used to statistically analyze the effect of complement on tumor immune infiltration. Finally, with a view to the role of complement in regulating T cell metabolism, complement could be a potential target for immunotherapies. Targeting complement to regulate the antitumor immune response seems to have potential for future treatment strategies. However, there are still many complex problems, such as who will benefit from this therapy and how to select the right therapeutic target and determine the appropriate drug concentration. The solutions to these problems depend on a deeper understanding of complement generation, activation, and regulatory and control mechanisms.

Targeted Therapies for Follicular Lymphoma

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the 2nd most common lymphoma in the USA/Western Europe. While incurable, the majority of patients are able to survive at least a decade with this disease. Response duration though varies, and subset of patients will relapse within 24 months of initial therapy (POD24). These patients have shortened survival compared to those who achieve more durable responses. Treatment interventions for patients are varied and include observation, radiation, or systemic therapies. Treatment outcomes have improved considerably over the last several decades with the introduction of new agents such as the CD 20 antibody rituximab and more recently with the advent of more targeted therapy. Most of the newer agents work differently from cytotoxic chemotherapy and either inhibit tumor-specific mutations, survival pathways, or harness the immune systems. While outcomes with traditional cytotoxic agents have been historically poor in certain subtypes such as POD24 and rituximab refractory disease, the reported outcomes with the newer agents have been encouraging as evident by several new drug approvals in FL. The biggest impact has been in the relapsed/refractory setting where we have approval of the immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide given in combination with rituximab. Based on the AUGMENT study, this agent has been approved for patients with R/R FL after one previous line of therapy. The EZH2 inhibitor, tazemetostat, was approved recently for patients with a known EZH2 mutation after one prior line of therapy or for FL patients who are deemed intolerant to other agents given the impressive safety profile in all patients. Finally, there is a plethora of agents that are designed to harness the immune system to combat this lymphoma. The data for these agents is still very early but nonetheless very impressive. In summary, FL is an incurable lymphoma without any standard of care options but has numerous treatments that have demonstrated some degree of efficacy. Recently we have made enormous strides in the understanding of some of the biological drivers of this disease which has allowed for refinement of treatment options. Moving forward, I would anticipate that we will continue to explore the use of agents that target specific mutations or utilize the immune system to hopefully one day achieve a cure.

Novel Therapy Approaches to Follicular Lymphoma

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common form of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. It is a disease characterised by a long median overall survival and high response rates to currently available chemotherapy and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy combinations. However, for a sub-group of patients the disease behaves aggressively, fails to respond adequately to initial therapy or relapses early. For others, the disease becomes resistant following multiple lines of therapy, and despite recent advances the main cause of death for patients with FL remains their lymphoma. A wide landscape of novel therapies is emerging and the role of individual agents in the FL treatment paradigm is still being established. Some agents, including the cereblon modulator lenalidomide, the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors idelalisib, copanlisib and duvelisib, and the EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat have received regulatory approval in the USA or European Union and have entered clinical practice for relapsed FL. Other developments, such as the emergence of immunotherapies including CAR-T cell therapy and bispecific antibodies, are expected to fundamentally change the approach to FL treatment in the future.

Consolidation with 90 Yttrium-ibritumomab tiuxetan after bendamustine and rituximab for relapsed follicular lymphoma

Bendamustine and rituximab (BR) are widely used in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) previously treated with conventional immunochemotherapy, but the role of consolidation radioimmunotherapy in these patients is unknown. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of consolidation with ⁹⁰ Yttrium-ibritumomab tiuxetan (⁹⁰ Y-IT) after re-induction therapy with BR in patients with previously treated FL. This study included adult patients with relapsed FL who had undergone one or two prior therapies. Re-induction therapy with BR was administered every 4 weeks up to 4-6 cycles. If patients achieved at least partial response, ⁹⁰ Y-IT was administered as consolidation therapy. The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) after consolidation. A total of 24 FL patients (median age 60 years) who had undergone one (n = 17) or two (n = 7) prior treatments received BR. After BR therapy, 22 patients proceeded to consolidation with ⁹⁰ Y-IT, resulting in an overall 88% response rate to the protocol treatment. Within a median observation period of 46.8 months, the estimated 2-year PFS rate after the consolidation among the 22 patients receiving ⁹⁰ Y-IT was 59% (95% confidence interval [CI], 38%-77%). Patients whose remission after previous treatment had lasted ≥2 years had a significantly higher 2-year PFS rate than patients whose remission after previous treatment had been <2 years (68% vs. 33%, Wilcoxon p = 0.0211). Major adverse events during the protocol treatment and within 2 years after the consolidation were hematological toxicities, but they were generally acceptable. Consequently, the estimated 2-year overall survival after the consolidation was 95% (95% CI, 74%-99%). In conclusion, in a subset of patients with previously treated FL, ⁹⁰ Y-IT consolidation after BR re-induction conferred a durable remission, indicating that consolidation therapy using ⁹⁰ Y-IT may be a novel therapeutic option for patients with relapsed FL (UMIN000008793).

Initial report of a phase II study with R-FND followed by ibritumomab tiuxetan radioimmunotherapy and rituximab maintenance in patients with untreated high-risk follicular lymphoma

R-FND (rituximab, fludarabine, mitoxantrone, and dexamethasone) can induce molecular remissions in indolent lymphoma. The addition of ⁹⁰yttrium ibritumomab tiuxetan (⁹⁰YIT) radioimmunotherapy following first-line induction treatment in patients with advanced follicular lymphoma (FL) may improve remission rates. We now report 10-year follow-up results from our sequential treatment approach with an abbreviated regimen of R-FND followed by ⁹⁰YIT consolidation and rituximab maintenance. Forty-nine patients were enrolled; 47 received treatment. Patients had high-risk (FLIPI score ≥3) FL of grade 1-3A and stage III/IV with adequate hematologic function. Following R-FND, the complete and partial response rates were 91% and 8.5%, respectively. After ⁹⁰YIT consolidation, the CR rate increased to 97%. The 10-year PFS rate was 49%. The most common non-hematologic, grade 3 or 4 adverse events were fatigue, dyspnea, and myalgia. Five developed myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). This treatment approach is most appropriate in FLIPI-based high-risk patients whose outlook with standard therapy is inadequate.

The Promise of Combining Radiation Therapy With Immunotherapy

The development of immunotherapy in oncology builds upon many years of scientific investigation into the cellular mechanics underlying interactions between tumor cells and immune cell populations. The past decade has brought an accelerating pace to the clinical investigation of new immunotherapy agents, particularly in the setting of metastatic disease. The integration of immunotherapy into phase 3 clinical trial design has lagged in settings of advanced locoregional disease, where combination with radiation therapy may be critical. Yet, such may be the settings where immunotherapies have their greatest potential to affect patient survival and achieve curative outcomes. In this review, we discuss the interaction of radiation with the immune system and the potential to augment antitumor immunity through combined-modality approaches that integrate radiation and immunotherapies. The dynamics of cellular and tumor response to radiation offer unique opportunities for beneficial interplay with immunotherapy that may go unrecognized with conventional screening and monotherapy clinical testing of novel pharmaceutical agents. Using immune checkpoint blockade as a primary example, we discuss recent preclinical and clinical studies that illustrate the potential synergy of such therapies in combination with radiation, and we highlight the potential clinical value of such interactions. For various immunotherapy agents, their greatest clinical effect may rest in combination with radiation, and efforts to facilitate systematic investigation of this approach are highly warranted.

Precision medicine in follicular lymphoma: Focus on predictive biomarkers

Current care for patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) offers most of them long-term survival. Improving it further will require careful patient selection. This review focuses on predictive biomarkers (ie, those whose outcome correlations depend on the treatment strategy) in FL, because awareness of what patient subsets benefit most or least from each therapy will help in this task. The first part of this review aims to summarize what biomarkers are predictive in FL, the magnitude of the effect and the quality of the evidence. We find predictive biomarkers in the setting of (a) indication of active treatment, (b) front-line induction (use of anthracyline-based regimens, CHOP vs bendamustine, addition of rituximab), (c) post-(front-line)induction (rituximab maintenance, radioimmunotherapy), and (d) relapse (hematopoietic stem cell transplant) and targeted agents. The second part of this review discusses the challenges of precision medicine in FL, including (a) cost, (b) clinical relevance considerations, and (c) difficulties over the broad implementation of biomarkers. We then provide our view on what biomarkers may become used in the next few years. We conclude by underscoring the importance of assessing the potential predictiveness of available biomarkers to improve patient care but also that there is a long road ahead before reaching their broad implementation due to remaining scientific, technological, and economic hurdles.

Time to Next Treatment as a Meaningful Endpoint for Trials of Primary Cutaneous Lymphoma

Time to next treatment (TTNT) is an emerging endpoint in clinical studies of primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL), with utility as a surrogate marker for the “duration of clinical benefit”. TTNT provides a highly clinically meaningful endpoint that uniquely reflects not only the duration of treatment efficacy on disease and symptom control, but also incorporates the patient experience by accounting for patient compliance and tolerance to the studied therapy(s). Given the distinct challenges of pin-pointing the exact date of progression in patients with multi-compartmental CTCL, TTNT overcomes many of the shortcomings of conventional, disease-focused, clinical endpoints in primary CTCL research. Although widely accepted in clinical research for numerous other incurable malignancies, TTNT currently lacks a standardised definition. In this paper, we describe the value of TTNT as a clinical endpoint, review the applications of TTNT in primary CTCL research, and propose a standardised definition of TTNT to be applied in future clinical research of primary CTCL therapies.

Chemotherapy combinations for B-cell lymphoma and chemo-free approach in elderly patients: an update on best practice

INTRODUCTION

Elderly patients represent a consistent portion of new diagnoses of B cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (B-NHL). The treatment approach in this setting can be challenging for clinicians due to treatment toxicities and patients' comorbidities to deal with. Immunochemotherapy still represents the main option in the front-line setting for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), with different options to choose depending on patient characteristics. In the last decade, a number of new drugs and combinations have been investigated, demonstrating efficacy and safety even in the older population and extending the spectrum of treatment choices for this setting.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the majority data in literature on immunochemotherapy regimens and chemo-free approaches available for DLBCL, FL, and MCL in the elderly, both in front-line and relapse/refractory setting, the incoming drugs and how to identify the best option for each patient.

EXPERT OPINION

The therapeutic approach for elderly B-NHL is challenging and a tailored approach guided by a geriatric assessment is mandatory, in order to optimize efficacy and minimize treatment-related toxicities. The more extended use of biological drugs may potentially lead to prolonged survival with reduction of toxicities and improved quality of life.

Autophagy in cancers including brain tumors: role of MicroRNAs

Autophagy has a crucial role in many cancers, including brain tumors. Several types of endogenous molecules (e.g. microRNAs, AKT, PTEN, p53, EGFR, and NF1) can modulate the process of autophagy. Recently miRNAs (small non-coding RNAs) have been found to play a vital role in the regulation of different cellular and molecular processes, such as autophagy. Deregulation of these molecules is associated with the development and progression of different pathological conditions, including brain tumors. It was found that miRNAs are epigenetic regulators, which influence the level of proteins coded by the targeted mRNAs with any modification of the genetic sequences. It has been revealed that various miRNAs (e.g., miR-7-1-3p, miR-340, miR-17, miR-30a, miR-224-3p, and miR-93), as epigenetic regulators, can modulate autophagy pathways within brain tumors. A deeper understanding of the underlying molecular targets of miRNAs, and their function in autophagy pathways could contribute to the development of new treatment methods for patients with brain tumors. In this review, we summarize the various miRNAs, which are involved in regulating autophagy in brain tumors. Moreover, we highlight the role of miRNAs in autophagy-related pathways in different cancers.

Evolving role of biomaterials in diagnostic and therapeutic radiation oncology

Radiation therapy to treat cancer has evolved significantly since the discovery of x-rays. Yet, radiation therapy still has room for improvement in reducing side effects and improving control of cancer. Safer and more effective delivery of radiation has led us to novel techniques and use of biomaterials. Biomaterials in combination with radiation and chemotherapy have started to appear in pre-clinical explorations and clinical applications, with many more on the horizon. Biomaterials have revolutionized the field of diagnostic imaging, and now are being cultivated into the field of theranostics, combination therapy, and tissue protection. This review summarizes recent development of biomaterials in radiation therapy in several application areas.

Radiation doses from 161Tb and 177Lu in single tumour cells and micrometastases

Background

Targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) is gaining importance. For TRT to be also used as adjuvant therapy or for treating minimal residual disease, there is a need to increase the radiation dose to small tumours. The aim of this in silico study was to compare the performances of ¹⁶¹Tb (a medium-energy β⁻ emitter with additional Auger and conversion electron emissions) and ¹⁷⁷Lu for irradiating single tumour cells and micrometastases, with various distributions of the radionuclide.

Methods

We used the Monte Carlo track-structure (MCTS) code CELLDOSE to compute the radiation doses delivered by ¹⁶¹Tb and ¹⁷⁷Lu to single cells (14 μm cell diameter with 10 μm nucleus diameter) and to a tumour cluster consisting of a central cell surrounded by two layers of cells (18 neighbours). We focused the analysis on the absorbed dose to the nucleus of the single tumoral cell and to the nuclei of the cells in the cluster. For both radionuclides, the simulations were run assuming that 1 MeV was released per μm³ (1436 MeV/cell). We considered various distributions of the radionuclides: either at the cell surface, intracytoplasmic or intranuclear.

Results

For the single cell, the dose to the nucleus was substantially higher with ¹⁶¹Tb compared to ¹⁷⁷Lu, regardless of the radionuclide distribution: 5.0 Gy vs. 1.9 Gy in the case of cell surface distribution; 8.3 Gy vs. 3.0 Gy for intracytoplasmic distribution; and 38.6 Gy vs. 10.7 Gy for intranuclear location. With the addition of the neighbouring cells, the radiation doses increased, but remained consistently higher for ¹⁶¹Tb compared to ¹⁷⁷Lu. For example, the dose to the nucleus of the central cell of the cluster was 15.1 Gy for ¹⁶¹Tb and 7.2 Gy for ¹⁷⁷Lu in the case of cell surface distribution of the radionuclide, 17.9 Gy for ¹⁶¹Tb and 8.3 Gy for ¹⁷⁷Lu for intracytoplasmic distribution and 47.8 Gy for ¹⁶¹Tb and 15.7 Gy for ¹⁷⁷Lu in the case of intranuclear location.

Conclusion

¹⁶¹Tb should be a better candidate than ¹⁷⁷Lu for irradiating single tumour cells and micrometastases, regardless of the radionuclide distribution.

Lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) can predict bendamustine therapeutic efficacy in low-grade B-cell lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

Bendamustine has been reported to be effective against low-grade B-cell lymphoma. We examined the effect of bendamustine on the lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) in low-grade B-cell lymphoma patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 127 cases of first line or relapse/refractory low-grade B-cell lymphoma in three individual institutions (Asahikawa Municipal Hospital, Aiiku Hospital, and Hakodate Municipal Hospital). Only patients who had received at least three courses of bendamustine therapy were selected; the LMR was evaluated at starting the initial course of bendamustine therapy. Time to next treatment (TTNT) was used to ascertain the efficacy of bendamustine therapy.

RESULTS

Follicular lymphoma (FL), at 68.5% (87/127), is the most common histological subtype of low-grade B-cell lymphoma. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the LMR showed a cutoff value of 2.0, and 33 cases (26.0%) had an LMR ≤2.0. Cases with LMR ≤2.0 had a significantly earlier progression than those with LMR > 2.0, based on the TTNT (P = .0007). Additionally, LMR ≤2.0 indicates earlier progression in TTNT when comparing only FL and low-grade B-cell lymphoma cases without FL (P = .007, 0.002). For multivariate analysis, the factors associated with an LMR ≤2.0 (HR, 2.741; 95% CI, 1.4330-5.245; P = .002) were considered as early progression factors with regard to the TTNT.

CONCLUSION

Lymphocyte-monocyte ratio effectively predicts the efficacy of bendamustine therapy for low-grade B-cell lymphoma, particularly FL; its application may improve treatment strategies for this disease.

Advances in targeted therapy for malignant lymphoma

The incidence of lymphoma has gradually increased over previous decades, and it ranks among the ten most prevalent cancers worldwide. With the development of targeted therapeutic strategies, though a subset of lymphoma patients has become curable, the treatment of refractory and relapsed diseases remains challenging. Many efforts have been made to explore new targets and to develop corresponding therapies. In addition to novel antibodies targeting surface antigens and small molecular inhibitors targeting oncogenic signaling pathways and tumor suppressors, immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T-cells have been rapidly developed to target the tumor microenvironment. Although these targeted agents have shown great success in treating lymphoma patients, adverse events should be noted. The selection of the most suitable candidates, optimal dosage, and effective combinations warrant further investigation. In this review, we systematically outlined the advances in targeted therapy for malignant lymphoma, providing a clinical rationale for mechanism-based lymphoma treatment in the era of precision medicine.

Follicular lymphoma: 2020 update on diagnosis and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is generally an indolent B cell lymphoproliferative disorder of transformed follicular center B cells. Follicular lymphoma is characterized by diffuse lymphadenopathy, bone marrow involvement, and splenomegaly. Extranodal involvement is less common. Cytopenias are relatively common but constitutional symptoms of fever, night sweats, and weight loss are uncommon in the absence of transformation to diffuse large B cell lymphoma.

DIAGNOSIS

The diagnosis is based on histology from a biopsy of a lymph node or other affected tissue. Incisional biopsy is preferred over needle biopsies in order to give adequate tissue to assign grade and assess for transformation. Immunohistochemical staining is positive in virtually all cases for cell surface CD19, CD20, CD10 and monoclonal immunoglobulin, as well as cytoplasmic expression of bcl-2 protein. The overwhelming majority of cases have the characteristic t(14;18) translocation involving the IgH/bcl-2 genes.

RISK STRATIFICATION

The Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) uses five independent predictors of inferior survival: age > 60 years, hemoglobin <12 g/dL, serum LDH > normal, Ann Arbor stage III/IV, number of involved nodal areas >4. The presence of 0-1, 2, and ≥ 3 adverse factors defines low, intermediate, and high-risk disease. There are other clinical prognostic models but the FLIPI remains the most common. Other factors such as time to relapse of less than 2 years from chemoimmunotherapy and specific gene mutations may also be useful for prognosis. Regardless of the prognostic model used, modern therapies have demonstrably improved prognosis.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

Observation continues to be appropriate for asymptomatic patients with low bulk disease and no cytopenias. There is no overall survival advantage for early treatment with either chemotherapy or single agent rituximab. For patients needing therapy, most patients are treated with chemoimmunotherapy, which has improved response rates, duration of response and overall survival (OS). Randomized studies have shown additional benefit for maintenance rituximab. Lenalidomide was non-inferior to chemoimmunotherapy in a randomized front-line study and, when combined with rituximab, was superior to rituximab alone in relapsed FL. Kinase inhibitors, other immunotherapies, and stem cell transplantation (SCT) are also considered for recurrent disease.

The use of yttrium in medical imaging and therapy: historical background and future perspectives

Yttrium presents a wide palette of isotopes with interesting coordination and radiochemical properties. We review its most prominent isotopes and their diverse medical uses in therapy and imaging.

Current targeted therapies in lymphomas

Purpose

This article summarizes current targeted therapies that have received regulatory approval for the treatment of B- and T-cell lymphomas.

Summary

Over the last 20 years, new drug therapies for lymphomas of B cells and T cells have expanded considerably. Targeted therapies for B-cell lymphomas include: (1) monoclonal antibodies directed at the CD20 lymphocyte antigen, examples of which are rituximab, ofatumumab, and obinutuzumab; (2) gene transfer therapy, an example of which is chimeric antigen receptor–modified T-cell (CAR-T) therapy directed at the CD19 antigen expressed on the cell surface of both immature and mature B cells; and (3) small-molecule inhibitors (ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, copanlisib, duvelisib, and idelalisib) that target the B-cell receptor signaling pathway. Of note, brentuximab vedotin is an antibody–drug conjugate that targets CD30, another lymphocyte antigen expressed on the cell surface of both Hodgkin lymphoma (a variant of B-cell lymphoma) and some T-cell lymphomas. Although aberrant epigenetic signaling pathways are present in both B- and T-cell lymphomas, epigenetic inhibitors (examples include belinostat, vorinostat, and romidepsin) are currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for T-cell lymphomas only. In addition, therapies that target the tumor microenvironment have been developed. Examples include mogamulizumab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab. In summary, the efficacy of these agents has led to the development of supportive care to mitigate adverse effects, due to the presence of on- or off-target toxicities.

Conclusion

The therapeutic landscape of lymphomas has continued to evolve. In turn, the efficacy of these agents has led to the development of supportive care to mitigate adverse effects, due to the presence of on- or off-target toxicities. Further opportunities are warranted to identify patients who are most likely to achieve durable response and reduce the risk of disease progression. Ongoing trials with current and investigational agents may further elucidate their place in therapy and therapeutic benefits.

Current Development of Monoclonal Antibodies in Cancer Therapy

Exploiting the unique specificity of monoclonal antibodies has revolutionized the treatment and diagnosis of haematological and solid organ malignancies; bringing benefit to millions of patients over the past decades. Recent achievements include conjugating antibodies with toxic payloads resulting in superior efficacy and/or reduced toxicity, development of molecular imaging techniques targeting specific antigens for use as predictive and prognostic biomarkers, the development of novel bi- and tri-specific antibodies to enhance therapeutic benefit and abrogate resistance and the success of immunotherapy agents. In this chapter, we review an overview of antibody structure and function relevant to cancer therapy and provide an overview of pivotal clinical trials which have led to regulatory approval of monoclonal antibodies in cancer treatment. We further discuss resistance mechanisms and the unique side effects of each class of antibody and provide an overview of emerging therapeutic agents.