Q-HAM: a multicenter upfront randomized phase II trial of quizartinib and high-dose Ara-C plus mitoxantrone in relapsed/refractory AML with FLT3-ITD

BACKGROUND

About 50% of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) fail to attain complete remission (CR) following cytarabine plus anthracycline-based induction therapy. Salvage chemotherapy regimens are based on high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC), which is frequently combined with mitoxantrone (HAM regimen). However, CR rates remain low, with less than one-third of the patients achieving a CR. FLT3-ITD has consistently been identified as an unfavorable molecular marker in both relapsed and refractory (r/r)-AML. One-quarter of patients who received midostaurin are refractory to induction therapy and relapse rate at 2 years exceeds 40%. The oral second-generation bis-aryl urea tyrosine kinase inhibitor quizartinib is a very selective FLT3 inhibitor, has a high capacity for sustained FLT3 inhibition, and has an acceptable toxicity profile.

METHODS

In this multicenter, upfront randomized phase II trial, all patients receive quizartinib combined with HAM (cytarabine 3g/m2 bidaily day one to day three, mitoxantrone 10mg/m2 days two and three) during salvage therapy. Efficacy is assessed by comparison to historical controls based on the matched threshold crossing approach with achievement of CR, complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), or complete remission with partial recovery of peripheral blood counts (CRh) as primary endpoint. During consolidation therapy (chemotherapy and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation), patients receive either prophylactic quizartinib therapy or measurable residual disease (MRD)-triggered preemptive continuation therapy with quizartinib according to up-front randomization. The matched threshold crossing approach is a novel study-design to enhance the classic single-arm trial design by including matched historical controls from previous clinical studies. It overcomes common disadvantages of single-armed and small randomized studies, since the expected outcome of the observed study population can be adjusted based on the matched controls with a comparable distribution of known prognostic and predictive factors. Furthermore, balanced treatment groups lead to stable statistical models. However, one of the limitations of our study is the inability to adjust for unobserved or unknown confounders. Addressing the primary endpoint, CR/CRi/CRh after salvage therapy, the maximal sample size of 80 patients is assessed generating a desirable power of the used adaptive design, assuming a logistic regression is performed at a one-sided significance level α=0.05, the aspired power is 0.8, and the number of matching partners per intervention patient is at least 1. After enrolling 20 patients, the trial sample size will be recalculated in an interim analysis based on a conditional power argument.

CONCLUSION

Currently, there is no commonly accepted standard for salvage chemotherapy treatment. The objective of the salvage therapy is to reduce leukemic burden, achieve the best possible remission, and perform a hemopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Thus, in patients with FLT3-ITD mutation, the comparison of quizartinib with intensive salvage therapy versus chemotherapy alone appears as a logical consequence in terms of efficacy and safety.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval and approvals from the local and federal competent authorities were granted. Trial results will be reported via peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences and scientific meetings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03989713; EudraCT Number: 2018-002675-17.

FDA Approval Summary: Gilteritinib for Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia with a FLT3 Mutation

On November 28, 2018, the FDA approved gilteritinib (Xospata; Astellas), a small-molecule FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor, for treatment of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia with a FLT3 mutation as detected by an FDA-approved test. In the ADMIRAL study, patients were randomized 2:1 to receive gilteritinib or standard chemotherapy and stratified by response to first-line treatment and intensity of prespecified chemotherapy. Efficacy was established on interim analysis on the basis of complete remission (CR) + CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) rate, duration of CR + CRh, and conversion from transfusion dependence to transfusion independence in 138 patients in the gilteritinib arm. With median follow-up of 4.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.8-15.8 months] at interim analysis, the CR + CRh rate was 21% (95% CI, 15%-29%), median duration of CR + CRh was 4.6 months (range, 0.1-15.8+), and conversion from transfusion dependence to transfusion independence was 31%. Revised labeling approved on May 29, 2019 included the results of the final analysis, showing an improvement in overall survival (OS) with gilteritinib compared with chemotherapy (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.49-0.83; one-sided P = 0.0004; median OS, 9.3 vs. 5.6 months). The OS benefit was observed in both high and low chemotherapy intensity subgroups. Labeling includes a boxed warning for differentiation syndrome and warnings for posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, QT prolongation, pancreatitis, and embryo-fetal toxicity. Safe use requires frequent monitoring of electrocardiograms and blood chemistries. Assessments of long-term safety are pending.

Safety and tolerability of quizartinib, a FLT3 inhibitor, in advanced solid tumors: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial

Background

Quizartinib, an inhibitor of class III receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), is currently in phase 3 development for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) bearing internal tandem duplications in the FLT3 gene. Aberrant RTK signaling is implicated in the pathogenesis of a variety of solid tumors, suggesting that inhibiting quizartinib-sensitive RTKs may be beneficial in precision cancer therapy.

Methods

This was a phase 1, open-label, modified Fibonacci dose-escalation study of orally administered quizartinib in patients with advanced solid tumors whose disease progressed despite standard therapy or for which there was no available standard treatment. Patients received quizartinib dihydrochloride (henceforth referred to as quizartinib) once daily throughout a 28-day treatment cycle. The primary endpoint was evaluation of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of quizartinib. Secondary endpoints included preliminary evidence of antitumor activity and determination of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of quizartinib.

Results

Thirteen patients were enrolled. Five patients received a starting dose of quizartinib 135 mg/day; dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of grade 3 pancytopenia, asymptomatic grade 3 QTc prolongation, and febrile neutropenia were observed in 1 patient each at this dose. A lower dose of quizartinib (90 mg/day [n = 8]) was administered without DLTs. The most common treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (n = 7, 54%), dysgeusia (n = 5, 38%), neutropenia (n = 3, 23%), and QTc prolongation (n = 3, 23%). Overall, all patients experienced at least 1 AE, and 4 experienced serious AEs (2 patients each in the 135-mg and 90-mg dose groups) including hematologic AEs, infections, and gastrointestinal disorders. Six patients (including 3 patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors [GIST]) had a best response of stable disease.

Conclusion

The MTD of quizartinib in patients with advanced solid tumors was 90 mg/day. Overall, the safety and tolerability of quizartinib were manageable, with no unexpected AEs. Quizartinib monotherapy had limited evidence of activity in this small group of patients with advanced solid tumors.

Trial registration

Clinical Trials Registration Number: NCT01049893; First Posted: January 15, 2010.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4692-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

State of the Art Update and Next Questions: Acute Myeloid Leukemia

As our general understanding regarding the complex nature of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is expanding, so is our ability to translate this biological data into clinically relevant information. The use of whole genome and whole exome sequencing has begun to shed light on the importance of a variety of somatic mutations that are frequently identified in AML. In turn, this has allowed the field to incorporate mutational data into prognostic classifications which can guide treatment decisions. Furthermore, minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring in AML is more commonplace as the prognostic relevance of MRD at various time points during treat is becoming clear. Many novel treatments have recently been approved, or are expected to gain approval in the near future, and this is opening the door to a more personalized approach to the management of AML.