Using population-based registries to study variations in health care

Hospital-level Variation in the Quality of Benign Inpatient Urologic Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To examine hospital-level variation in outcomes following benign urologic surgeries given that hospital-level variation in surgical outcomes can portend quality and appropriateness of care concerns and identify quality improvement opportunities in perioperative care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the Washington State Comprehensive Hospital Abstract Reporting System, we identified patients who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), percutaneous nephrostolithotomy (PCNL), and pyeloplasty from 2003 to 2008. We classified prolonged postoperative length of stay (LOS) as that exceeding the 75th percentile, and we measured the rate of Agency for Healthcare Quality Patient Safety Indicators, readmissions, and death. We calculated hospital-specific observed-to-expected event rates using random effects multilevel multivariable models adjusted for age and comorbidity.

RESULTS

We identified 6699 TURP patients at 54 hospitals, 2541 PCNL patients at 45 hospitals, and 584 pyeloplasty patients at 36 hospitals. Complication rates were highest after PCNL (22.9% prolonged LOS vs 17.3% for TURP and 13.9% for pyeloplasty, P < .001; 3.4% 90-day mortality vs 0.6% for TURP and 0% for pyeloplasty). Hospital-level variation was most substantial for LOS after TURP and pyeloplasty (8.1% and 14.3% of variance in prolonged LOS, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Hospital-level variation is common after benign inpatient urologic surgeries and may relate to difference in perioperative provider practice patterns. The morbidity of PCNL in this study was higher than expected and merits further investigation.

Hospital-level variation in the quality of urologic cancer surgery

BACKGROUND

Unexplained variation in outcomes after common surgeries raises concerns about the quality and appropriateness of surgical care. Understanding variation in surgical outcomes may identify processes that could affect the quality of surgical and postoperative care. The authors of this report examined hospital-level variation in outcomes after inpatient urologic oncology procedures.

METHODS

Patients who underwent radical cystectomy, radical nephrectomy, and radical prostatectomy were identified from the Washington State Comprehensive Hospital Abstract Reporting System for the years 2003 through 2007. The postoperative length of stay (LOS) was measured, and LOS that exceeded the 75th percentile was classified as prolonged. The occurrence of Agency for Healthcare Quality patient safety indicators (PSIs), readmissions, and deaths also were measured. Analyses were adjusted for patient age and comorbidity in random effects, multilevel, multivariable models that assessed hospital-level outcomes.

RESULTS

The authors identified 853 patients from 37 hospitals who underwent cystectomy, 3018 patients who underwent nephrectomy from 51 hospitals, and 8228 patients who underwent prostatectomy from 51 hospitals. Complications captured by PSIs were rare. Hospital-level variation was most profound for LOS outcomes after nephrectomy and prostatectomy (variance in prolonged LOS, 8.1% and 26.7%, respectively), thromboembolic events after nephrectomy (8% of variance), and mortality after cystectomy (7.1% of variance).

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital-level variation confounds the care of urologic cancer patients in the state of Washington. The authors concluded that transparent reporting of surgical outcomes and local quality-improvement initiatives should be considered to ameliorate the observed variation and improve the quality of cystectomy, nephrectomy, and prostatectomy care.