Use of Adjuvant Cisplatin-Based Versus Carboplatin-Based Chemotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Findings From the Florida Initiative for Quality Cancer Care

Treatment patterns in non-small-cell lung cancer in China: Results from the CancerMPact survey 2020

PURPOSE

To report the treatment patterns of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in China based on a survey of physicians (CancerMPact).

METHODS

117 Chinese physicians from 27 cities in mainland China were recruited for an online survey in October 2020, reporting on how they treat their patients across all disease stages, including histology and relevant biomarkers in advanced or metastatic NSCLC.

RESULTS

Surveyed physicians indicated that almost half of their stage I patients were treated with surgery only. For stage II patients, it is more common to treat with surgery in combination with radiation and/or systemic therapy (44.5%), whereas the use of surgery decreases for stage III patients and the overall use of systemic therapy increases (63.4%-68.8%). Physicians are more likely to use systemic therapy alone for stage IV patients (31.4%). Chosen treatment regimens for stage IV NSCLC varied by histology and biomarkers, and several observed treatment patterns differed from the USA. In China, platinum-based chemotherapy is standard of care for treating stage IV NSCLC patients, unlike the USA, where checkpoint inhibitors are the dominant choice in first-line. Further, Chinese physicians reported prescribing biomarker-targeted agents for one-third or less of their patients with EGFR, ALK, ROS-1, or BRAF driver mutations, compared to 60-95% in the USA.

CONCLUSION

As treatment options expand in NSCLC in China, physicians face complex decisions for the treatment of their patients. Treatment patterns often vary, including by disease histology and clinically relevant biomarkers. The standard of care for NSCLC in China also differs from the USA.

Relationships of Symptom Groups and Functioning Domains in Patients with Advanced-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Treatment: A Cross-Sectional Study

The purpose of this study was to describe the symptoms experienced by patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), examine whether different symptom groups significantly affected different functioning domains in these patients, and determine the effect of the "lack of energy" and "pain" symptom groups on the different functioning domains of health-related quality of life (HRQOL). From a single tertiary institution, this cross-sectional study enrolled 135 consecutive NSCLC patients who were mostly undergoing chemotherapy and were in the advanced stage (National University Hospital, Daegu, South Korea). Clinical and self-reported demographic information and data on different functioning domains (from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)), symptom experience (from the EORTC QLQ-LC13), and the Symptom Distress Scale (SDS) were examined. The four most common symptoms were fatigue (69%), pain (47%), dyspnea (38%), and lack of appetite (36%). The "pain" symptom group was negatively associated with physical, emotional, cognitive, and role functioning. The "lack of energy" symptom group was negatively associated with physical, role, emotional, social, and cognitive functioning. The "lack of energy" symptom group explained the most variance for physical and role functioning, and the "pain" symptom group explained the most variance for emotional functioning. Impaired concentration explained the most variance for cognitive functioning.

A phase 2 study of adjuvant carboplatin plus S-1 followed by maintenance S-1 therapy for patients with completely resected stage II/IIIA non-small cell lung cancer-Japanese Northern East Area Thoracic Surgery Study Group JNETS1302 study

Background

The standard adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for completely resected pathological stage II/IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is four courses of cisplatin plus vinorelbine. However, the continuity and toxicity of cisplatin-based regimens remain problematic. Conversely, carboplatin-based chemotherapy is a less toxic and more tolerable regimen for various stages of NSCLC. In particular, the efficacy and tolerability of carboplatin plus S-1 in advanced NSCLC were confirmed by previous pivotal studies such as the LETS trail. Therefore, this phase II study assessed the feasibility, safety, and usefulness of carboplatin plus S-1 followed by maintenance S-1 as an adjuvant treatment.

Methods

In this single-arm, multicenter phase II study, 40 patients who previously underwent complete resection of NSCLC were enrolled from November 2013 to January 2015. The chemotherapy protocol was four cycles of carboplatin (AUC 5 on day 1) and oral S-1 (80 mg/m² every other day from days 1 to 21) followed by oral S-1 (80 mg/m² every other day for 48 weeks). The primary endpoint was the treatment completion rate, and the secondary endpoints were adverse events and 2-year recurrence-free survival.

Results

The treatment completion rate of the planned schedule was as low as 30.0% (90% confidence interval: 40.3–63.0%). The reasons for adjuvant chemotherapy discontinuation were adverse events, refusal, tumor recurrence, and other reasons in 13, 6, 10, and 2 patients, respectively. The 2-year progression-free survival rate was 66.7% among patients who completed maintenance chemotherapy. There were no treatment-related deaths, and most adverse events were less than grade 3.

Conclusions

Carboplatin plus S-1 followed by S-1 maintenance for 1 year in the adjuvant treatment of NSCLC was not tolerable, although most adverse events were not severe. However, patients who can fully complete the regimen might experience clinical benefit.

Treatment patterns in non-small-cell lung cancer in USA: results of the CancerMPact Survey 2018

Aim: To report the results of a survey of USA physicians (CancerMPact) that treat non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Materials & methods: 60 physicians were surveyed. Questions covered aspects of the treatment for all stages of the disease. Results: For stage I patients, over 70% of the treatments were based on surgery. For stage II/III disease, a strong preference for combined therapy (surgery/radiation/systemic therapy) was observed. For advanced/stage IV patients, physicians used systemic therapy alone, and choosed the regimen based on histology and biomarkers. Use of PD-L1 inhibitors was highly dependent on histology and biomarkers. Conclusion: The treatment choices of non-small-cell lung cancer are increasingly complex, involve different treatment modalities and are highly dependent on histology and biomarkers, besides stage.