1
|
Vink-Börger E, den Bakker M, Voorham R, van Nederveen F, Nagtegaal I. Mismatch repair deficiency: how reliable is the two-antibody approach? A national real-life study. Histopathology 2024; 85:639-648. [PMID: 38859771 DOI: 10.1111/his.15236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Revised: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Traditionally, mismatch repair (MMR) status is determined by a panel of four antibodies (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6). If all proteins are retained, cases are MMR proficient (pMMR), while loss of one or more proteins is indicative of MMR deficiency (dMMR). This approach has been challenged in favour of a two-antibody approach, using PMS2 and MSH6 as a first screening. Their retainment is deemed sufficient to declare cases pMMR. In this study we aim to verify the validity of the two-antibody approach. METHODS AND RESULTS We performed a nationwide study in colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer (EC) diagnosed between 2016 and 2023, including 47,657 patients to evaluate the two-antibody approach. In 0.17% and 0.4% of cases of CRC and EC, respectively, dMMR cases would be missed with the two-antibody approach. Subgroup analyses pointed towards slightly increased miss rates in younger patients (under the age of 50 years) in both groups and identified special subtypes (signet ring cell carcinoma, medullary carcinoma, and mucinous carcinoma in CRC and clear cell carcinoma in EC) with increased miss rates. For these specific subgroups, a low threshold should be used for further testing. In case of ambiguous or heterogeneous staining patterns, four antibodies should be used. CONCLUSION In general, the application of a two-antibody MMR testing strategy does not lead to considerable failure of dMMR identification and saves costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Iris Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Andrea MK, Jepsen RK, Klein MF, Gögenur I, Kuhlmann TP. Predictors for dMMR colorectal cancer in patients with serrated lesions and polyps - A register-based cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol 2024; 91:102601. [PMID: 38905781 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2024] [Revised: 06/07/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Serrated lesions and polyps (SP) are precursors of up to 30 % of colorectal cancers (CRC) through the serrated pathway. This often entails early BRAF mutations and MLH1 hypermethylation leading to mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) CRC. We investigated predictors of dMMR CRC among patients with co-occurrence of CRC and SP to increase our knowledge on the serrated pathway. METHODS We used data from The Danish Pathology Registry and Danish Colorectal Cancer Groups Database from the period 2010-2021 to investigate risk factors for development of dMMR CRC. We used logistic regression models to identify difference in risk factors of developing dMMR CRC in comparison to CRC with proficient MMR (pMMR). RESULTS We included 3273 patients with a median age of 70.7 years [64.3,76.4] of which 1850 (56.5 %) were male. dMMR CRC was present in 592 patients (18.1 %), with loss of MLH1/PMS2 being most common. The risk of dMMR CRC was significantly higher in females OR 3.47 [2.87;4.20]. When adjusting for age, SP subtype, conventional adenomas (CA), anatomical location and lifestyle factors, female sex remained the strongest predictor OR 2.84 [2.27;3.56]. The presence of sessile serrated lesions with or without dysplasia was related to higher risk OR 1.60 [1.11;2.31] and OR 1.42 [1.11;1.82] respectively, while conventional adenomas constituted a lower risk OR 0.68 [0.55;0.84]. CONCLUSION In conclusion we found several predictors of whom female sex had the strongest correlation with dMMR CRC in patients with SP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mille Kyhn Andrea
- Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
| | - Rikke Karlin Jepsen
- Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mads Falk Klein
- Department of Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ismail Gögenur
- Department of Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark; Center for Surgical Sciences, University Hospital Zealand, Køge, Denmark; Department of Surgery, University Hospital Zealand, Køge, Denmark
| | - Tine Plato Kuhlmann
- Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jafry BH, Buhaya MH, Milsap A, Jones AL, Goksu SY, Verma N, Brown TJ, Hughes A, Nair R, Sanford N, Su J, Huang E, Kazmi SMA. Clinical, pathological, and adjuvant chemotherapy use differences among microsatellite unstable and microsatellite stable colon cancers. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER CENTER 2024; 4:169-175. [PMID: 39282583 PMCID: PMC11390619 DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2024.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2024] [Revised: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Colon cancers are categorized into mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite unstable (MSI-H) and mismatch repair proficient/microsatellite stable (MSS) cancers. This study aims to compare the disease characteristics and trends in the utilization of cancer therapies across different age groups and stages in these two groups. Methods MSI-H and MSS colon adenocarcinomas from 2010 to 2016 were identified using the National Cancer Database. We compared patient and disease characteristics between the two groups and evaluated the use of adjuvant chemotherapy across age groups and cancer stages. Within MSI-H and MSS groups, we conducted a landmark analysis after propensity score matching for adjuvant chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy to determine its effect on survival. Results Of the 542,368 patients that met inclusion criteria, 120,751 (22%) had mismatch repair results available-out of these 96,928 (80%) had MSS colon cancers while 23,823 (19.7%) had MSI-H cancers. MSI-H disease had a bimodal age distribution (<40 years = 22%; ≥75 years = 26%) and was frequent among females (22%) and non-Hispanic Whites (20%). Among those < 65 years, 15% of low-risk stage 2 MSI-H patients and 40% of high-risk stage 2 MSI-H patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. More than two-thirds of stage 3 patients <65 years received adjuvant chemotherapy in both groups. After conducting propensity-score matching for age, gender, and co-morbidities, we found that adjuvant chemotherapy use had a trend towards lower overall survival (OS) in low-risk stage 2 MSI-H (HR = 1.8 [95% CI, 0.8-4.02]) and high-risk stage 2 MSI-H (HR = 1.42 [95% CI, 0.96-2.12]) groups. Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved OS in stage 3 colon cancer patients irrespective of microsatellite status or risk category of disease. Conclusions MSI-H colon cancer had bimodal age distribution. Among stage 2 MSI-H patients <65 years, a notable proportion received adjuvant chemotherapy. Among MSI-H stage 2 patients, adjuvant chemotherapy use was associated with lower survival while it significantly improved survival for stage 3 patients, irrespective of MSI status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baqir Hasan Jafry
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | - Munir Hassan Buhaya
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | - Allante Milsap
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | - Amy Little Jones
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | | | - Nilesh Verma
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | - Timothy J Brown
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | - Amy Hughes
- Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | - Rasmi Nair
- Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | - Nina Sanford
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | - Joseph Su
- Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | - Emina Huang
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | - Syed Mohammad Ali Kazmi
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fountzilas E, Papadopoulos T, Papadopoulou E, Gouedard C, Kourea HP, Constantoulakis P, Magkou C, Sfakianaki M, Kotoula V, Bantouna D, Raptou G, Saetta AA, Christopoulou G, Hatzibougias D, Michalopoulou-Manoloutsiou E, Siatra E, Eleftheriadis E, Kavoura E, Kaklamanis L, Sourla A, Papaxoinis G, Pavlakis K, Hytiroglou P, Vourlakou C, Arapantoni-Dadioti P, Murray S, Nasioulas G, Timologos G, Fountzilas G, Saridaki Z. Nationwide Real-World Data of Microsatellite Instability and/or Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Cancer: Prevalence and Testing Patterns. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:1076. [PMID: 38893603 PMCID: PMC11171982 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14111076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2024] [Revised: 05/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Determination of microsatellite instability (MSI)/mismatch repair (MMR) status in cancer has several clinical implications. Our aim was to integrate MSI/MMR status from patients tested in Greece to assess the prevalence of MSI-high (MSI-H)/deficient MMR (dMMR) per tumor type, testing patterns over time and concordance between MSI and MMR status. We retrospectively recorded MSI/MMR testing data of patients with diverse tumor types performed in pathology and molecular diagnostics laboratories across Greece. Overall, 18 of 22 pathology and/or molecular diagnostics laboratories accepted our invitation to participate. In the 18 laboratories located across the country, 7916 tumor samples were evaluated for MSI/MMR status. MSI/MMR testing significantly increased in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and other tumor types overtime (p < 0.05). The highest prevalence was reported in endometrial cancer (47 of 225 patients, 20.9%). MSI-H/dMMR was observed in most tumor types, even in low proportions. Among 904 tumors assessed both for MSI and MMR status, 21 had discordant results (overall discordance rate, 2.3%). We reported MSI-H/dMMR prevalence rates in patients with diverse cancers, while demonstrating increasing referral patterns from medical oncologists in the country overtime. The anticipated high rate of concordance between MSI and MMR status in paired analysis was confirmed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Fountzilas
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Lukes’s Clinic, 55236 Thessaloniki, Greece
- Medical Oncology, European University Cyprus, 2404 Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Theofanis Papadopoulos
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, KARYO Ltd., 54622 Thessaloniki, Greece; (T.P.); (G.T.)
| | | | - Cedric Gouedard
- BioPath Innovations SA, 15124 Athens, Greece; (C.G.); (S.M.)
| | - Helen P. Kourea
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece; (H.P.K.); (D.B.)
| | | | - Christina Magkou
- Department of Pathology, Evangelismos Hospital, 10676 Athens, Greece; (C.M.); (C.V.)
| | - Maria Sfakianaki
- Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Medical School, University of Crete, 71410 Heraklion, Greece;
| | - Vassiliki Kotoula
- Department of Pathology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece; (V.K.); (G.R.); (P.H.)
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54006 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Dimitra Bantouna
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece; (H.P.K.); (D.B.)
| | - Georgia Raptou
- Department of Pathology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece; (V.K.); (G.R.); (P.H.)
| | - Angelica A. Saetta
- First Department of Pathology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laiko General Hospital, 15772 Athens, Greece;
| | | | - Dimitris Hatzibougias
- microDiagnostics LP, Private Surgical & Molecular Pathology Laboratory, 54622 Thessaloniki, Greece; (D.H.); (E.M.-M.)
| | | | - Eleni Siatra
- Department of Pathology, Henry Dunant Hospital, 11526 Athens, Greece; (E.S.); (P.A.-D.)
| | | | - Evangelia Kavoura
- Pathology Department, IASO Women’s Hospital, 15123 Athens, Greece; (E.K.); (K.P.)
| | - Loukas Kaklamanis
- Pathology Department, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, 17674 Athens, Greece;
| | - Antigoni Sourla
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Bioiatriki Laboratories, 11528 Athens, Greece;
| | - George Papaxoinis
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Agios Savvas Cancer Hospital, 11522 Athens, Greece;
| | - Kitty Pavlakis
- Pathology Department, IASO Women’s Hospital, 15123 Athens, Greece; (E.K.); (K.P.)
| | - Prodromos Hytiroglou
- Department of Pathology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece; (V.K.); (G.R.); (P.H.)
| | - Christina Vourlakou
- Department of Pathology, Evangelismos Hospital, 10676 Athens, Greece; (C.M.); (C.V.)
| | | | - Samuel Murray
- BioPath Innovations SA, 15124 Athens, Greece; (C.G.); (S.M.)
| | | | - Grigorios Timologos
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, KARYO Ltd., 54622 Thessaloniki, Greece; (T.P.); (G.T.)
| | - George Fountzilas
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54006 Thessaloniki, Greece;
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
- Department of Medical Oncology, German Oncology Center, 4108 Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Zacharenia Saridaki
- First Oncology Department, Metropolitan Hospital, 18547 Piraeus, Greece;
- Asklepios, Oncology Department, 71303 Heraklion, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dosunmu GT, Shergill A. Colorectal Cancer: Genetic Underpinning and Molecular Therapeutics for Precision Medicine. Genes (Basel) 2024; 15:538. [PMID: 38790167 PMCID: PMC11120657 DOI: 10.3390/genes15050538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2024] [Revised: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) accounts for about 10% of all cancer cases and 9% of cancer-related deaths globally. In the United States alone, CRC represents approximately 12.6% of all cancer cases, with a mortality rate of about 8%. CRC is now the first leading cause of cancer death in men younger than age 50 and second in women younger than age 50. This review delves into the genetic landscape of CRC, highlighting key mutations and their implications in disease progression and treatment. We provide an overview of the current and emerging therapeutic strategies tailored to individual genomic profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ardaman Shergill
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kiran N, Yashaswini C, Maheshwari R, Bhattacharya S, Prajapati BG. Advances in Precision Medicine Approaches for Colorectal Cancer: From Molecular Profiling to Targeted Therapies. ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci 2024; 7:967-990. [PMID: 38633600 PMCID: PMC11019743 DOI: 10.1021/acsptsci.4c00008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
Precision medicine is transforming colorectal cancer treatment through the integration of advanced technologies and biomarkers, enhancing personalized and effective disease management. Identification of key driver mutations and molecular profiling have deepened our comprehension of the genetic alterations in colorectal cancer, facilitating targeted therapy and immunotherapy selection. Biomarkers such as microsatellite instability (MSI) and DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) guide treatment decisions, opening avenues for immunotherapy. Emerging technologies such as liquid biopsies, artificial intelligence, and machine learning promise to revolutionize early detection, monitoring, and treatment selection in precision medicine. Despite these advancements, ethical and regulatory challenges, including equitable access and data privacy, emphasize the importance of responsible implementation. The dynamic nature of colorectal cancer, with its tumor heterogeneity and clonal evolution, underscores the necessity for adaptive and personalized treatment strategies. The future of precision medicine in colorectal cancer lies in its potential to enhance patient care, clinical outcomes, and our understanding of this intricate disease, marked by ongoing evolution in the field. The current reviews focus on providing in-depth knowledge on the various and diverse approaches utilized for precision medicine against colorectal cancer, at both molecular and biochemical levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neelakanta
Sarvashiva Kiran
- Department
of Biotechnology, School of Applied Sciences, REVA University, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560064, India
| | - Chandrashekar Yashaswini
- Department
of Biotechnology, School of Applied Sciences, REVA University, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560064, India
| | - Rahul Maheshwari
- School
of Pharmacy and Technology Management, SVKM’s
Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies (NMIMS) Deemed-to-University, Green Industrial Park, TSIIC,, Jadcherla, Hyderabad 509301, India
| | - Sankha Bhattacharya
- School
of Pharmacy and Technology Management, SVKM’S
NMIMS Deemed-to-be University, Shirpur, Maharashtra 425405, India
| | - Bhupendra G. Prajapati
- Shree.
S. K. Patel College of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Ganpat University, Kherva, Gujarat 384012, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nádorvári ML, Lotz G, Kulka J, Kiss A, Tímár J. Microsatellite instability and mismatch repair protein deficiency: equal predictive markers? Pathol Oncol Res 2024; 30:1611719. [PMID: 38655493 PMCID: PMC11036414 DOI: 10.3389/pore.2024.1611719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
Current clinical guidelines recommend mismatch repair (MMR) protein immunohistochemistry (IHC) or molecular microsatellite instability (MSI) tests as predictive markers of immunotherapies. Most of the pathological guidelines consider MMR protein IHC as the gold standard test to identify cancers with MMR deficiency and recommend molecular MSI tests only in special circumstances or to screen for Lynch syndrome. However, there are data in the literature which suggest that the two test types may not be equal. For example, molecular epidemiology studies reported different rates of deficient MMR (dMMR) and MSI in various cancer types. Additionally, direct comparisons of the two tests revealed relatively frequent discrepancies between MMR IHC and MSI tests, especially in non-colorectal and non-endometrial cancers and in cases with unusual dMMR phenotypes. There are also scattered clinical data showing that the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors is different if the patient selection was based on dMMR versus MSI status of the cancers. All these observations question the current dogma that dMMR phenotype and genetic MSI status are equal predictive markers of the immunotherapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - József Tímár
- Department of Pathology, Forensic and Insurance Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Stemmer A, Margalit O, Serpas V, Strauss G, Thomas J, Shah P, Tau N, Levanon K, Shacham-Shmueli E, Kopetz S, Overman M, Boursi B. Immunotherapy in mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer - Outcome and novel predictive markers. Eur J Cancer 2024; 198:113495. [PMID: 38157568 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to assess predictive markers for response to immunotherapy in dMMR/MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS A study using two prospective cohorts from MD Anderson Cancer Center and Sheba Medical Center of consecutive patients with dMMR/MSI-H mCRC that were treated with immunotherapy between 2014-2022. Primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS) and secondary outcome was overall response rate (ORR). Evaluated predictors included ECOG-PS score, RAS/BRAF status, single-agent versus doublet immunotherapy, metastatic sites, disease burden, and CEA levels prior to treatment initiation. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression model were used to analyze the effect of exposure variables on PFS. RESULTS The study included 153 patients. Median follow-up time was 26 months (IQR 11-48). Median PFS was 51.6 months (95%CI 38.1-NR) and ORR was 58.1%. In a univariate analysis, male sex was associated with worse PFS with a HR of 1.67 (95% CI 1.00-2.79); Right-sided tumors were associated with improved PFS with a HR of 0.56 (95% CI 0.32-0.97); Liver or lung metastasis were associated with worse PFS with HRs of 2.35 (95%CI 1.43-3.88) and 2.30 (95%CI 1.31-4.04), respectively; ECOG-PS score ≥ 2, CEA levels ˃5 μg/L prior to treatment initiation and ≥ 3 metastatic sites were associated with worse PFS with HRs of 2.09 (95%CI 0.98-4.47), 2.23 (95%CI 1.30-3.81) and 3.11 (95%CI 1.61-6.03), respectively. Liver or lung metastasis remained significant in a multivariable model. CONCLUSIONS Extent of disease (worse PFS with high CEA, poor ECOG-PS and ≥3 metastatic sites) and disease location (worse PFS with liver or lung metastasis and left sided tumor) were associated with immunotherapy outcome in dMMR/MSI-H mCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amos Stemmer
- Department of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel; Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
| | - Ofer Margalit
- Department of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel; Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Victoria Serpas
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gal Strauss
- Department of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel; Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Jane Thomas
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Preksha Shah
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Noam Tau
- Department of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel; Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Keren Levanon
- Department of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel; Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Einat Shacham-Shmueli
- Department of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel; Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Scott Kopetz
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael Overman
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ben Boursi
- Department of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel; Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lawler T, Parlato L, Warren Andersen S. Racial disparities in colorectal cancer clinicopathological and molecular tumor characteristics: a systematic review. Cancer Causes Control 2024; 35:223-239. [PMID: 37688643 PMCID: PMC11090693 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01783-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE African Americans have the highest colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality of all racial groups in the USA, which may relate to differences in healthcare access or advanced stage at diagnosis. Recent evidence indicates that differences in tumor characteristics may also underlie disparities in mortality. To highlight recent findings and areas for investigation, we completed the first systematic review of racial disparities in CRC tumor prognostic markers, including clinicopathological markers, microsatellite instability (MSI), oncogene mutations, and novel markers, including cancer stem cells and immune markers. METHODS Relevant studies were identified via PubMed, limited to original research published within the last 10 years. Ninety-six articles were identified that compared the prevalence of mortality-related CRC tumor characteristics in African Americans (or other African ancestry populations) to White cases. RESULTS Tumors from African ancestry cases are approximately 10% more likely to contain mutations in KRAS, which confer elevated mortality and resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition. Conversely, African Americans have approximately 50% lower odds for BRAF-mutant tumors, which occur less frequently but have similar effects on mortality and therapeutic resistance. There is less consistent evidence supporting disparities in mutations for other oncogenes, including PIK3CA, TP53, APC, NRAS, HER2, and PTEN, although higher rates of PIK3CA mutations and lower prevalence of MSI status for African ancestry cases are supported by recent evidence. Although emerging evidence suggests that immune markers reflecting anti-tumor immunity in the tumor microenvironment may be lower for African American cases, there is insufficient evidence to evaluate disparities in other novel markers, cancer stem cells, microRNAs, and the consensus molecular subtypes. CONCLUSION Higher rates of KRAS-mutant tumors in in African Americans may contribute to disparities in CRC mortality. Additional work is required to understand whether emerging markers, including immune cells, underlie the elevated CRC mortality observed for African Americans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Lawler
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Lisa Parlato
- School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Shaneda Warren Andersen
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
- School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
- University of Wisconsin-Madison, Suite 1007B, WARF, 610 Walnut Street, Madison, WI, 53726, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhang Z, Huang J, Li Y, Yan H, Xie J, Wang J, Zhao B. Global burden, risk factors, clinicopathological characteristics, molecular biomarkers and outcomes of microsatellite instability-high gastric cancer. Aging (Albany NY) 2024; 16:948-963. [PMID: 38224334 PMCID: PMC10817383 DOI: 10.18632/aging.205431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
Microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) has gained considerable interests since it was approved as a tumor-agnostic biomarker in immunotherapy. However, the reported characteristics of MSI-H gastric cancer (GC) are inconsistent due to the biological complexity. Here, we aim to clarify the prevalence, risk factors, clinicopathological/molecular features and outcomes of MSI-H GC though a comprehensive review on 43246 patients from 134 cohorts. Overall, the proportion of MSI-H GC was 14.5% (95% CI, 13.3%-15.8%). Patients with MSI-H GC were less likely to have Epstein-Barr virus infection. High incidences of MSI-H GC were associated with female, older age, lower gastric body, Lauren intestinal histology, WHO tubular and mucinous subtypes, and early disease stage. Additionally, patients with MSI-H GC harbored more KRAS mutation, PD-L1 positivity, CD8 overexpression, and higher TMB, but less HER2 positivity and TP53 mutation. When treated with conventional strategy, the 5-year survival rates in MSI-H patients (70.3%) and MSI-L/MSS patients (43.7%) were significantly different (p<0.001). Patients with MSI-H GC derived larger benefit from immunotherapy in term of overall survival (pInteraction<0.001) and objective response (pInteraction=0.02). Since the prevalence of MSI-H GC is relatively high and associated with distinct clinicopathological and molecular characteristics, MSI testing should be conducted during standard diagnostical activity. Moreover, giving MSI-H tumors are often diagnosed at early stage and have favorable outcomes, less aggressive treatment strategies may be considered in clinical practice. In summary, this panoramic review may assist in design and/or interpretation of clinical trials, provide references in drug development, and constitute complementary information in drafting the clinical practice guideline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhishan Zhang
- Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou 362000, China
| | - Jinyuan Huang
- Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou 362000, China
- The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China
| | - Yingying Li
- Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou 362000, China
- The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China
| | - Huimeng Yan
- Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou 362000, China
- The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China
| | - Junxing Xie
- Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou 362000, China
| | - Jing Wang
- Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou 362000, China
| | - Bin Zhao
- Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou 362000, China
- The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chandran EBA, Iannantuono GM, Atiq SO, Akbulut D, Sinaii N, Simon NI, Banday AR, Boudjadi S, Gurram S, Nassar AH, Rosenberg JE, Butera G, Teo MY, Sonpavde G, Coleman JA, Apolo AB. Mismatch repair deficiency and microsatellite instability in urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ ONCOLOGY 2024; 3:e000335. [PMID: 39086924 PMCID: PMC11203074 DOI: 10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
Background Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) occur in a subset of cancers and have been shown to confer sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI); however, there is a lack of prospective data in urothelial carcinoma (UC). Methods and analysis We performed a systematic review to estimate the prevalence of dMMR and MSI-H in UC, including survival and clinical outcomes. We searched for studies published up to 26 October 2022 in major scientific databases. We screened 1745 studies and included 110. Meta-analyses were performed if the extracted data were suitable. Results The pooled weighted prevalences of dMMR in bladder cancer (BC) and upper tract UC (UTUC) were 2.30% (95% CI 1.12% to 4.65%) and 8.95% (95% CI 6.81% to 11.67%), respectively. The pooled weighted prevalences of MSI-H in BC and UTUC were 2.11% (95% CI 0.82% to 5.31%) and 8.36% (95% CI 5.50% to 12.53%), respectively. Comparing localised versus metastatic disease, the pooled weighted prevalences for MSI-H in BC were 5.26% (95% CI 0.86% to 26.12%) and 0.86% (95% CI 0.59% to 1.25%), respectively; and in UTUC, they were 18.04% (95% CI 13.36% to 23.91%) and 4.96% (95% CI 2.72% to 8.86%), respectively. Cumulatively, the response rate in dMMR/MSI-H metastatic UC treated with an ICI was 22/34 (64.7%) compared with 1/9 (11.1%) with chemotherapy. Conclusion Both dMMR and MSI-H occur more frequently in UTUC than in BC. In UC, MSI-H occurs more frequently in localised disease than in metastatic disease. These biomarkers may predict sensitivity to ICI in metastatic UC and resistance to cisplatin-based chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias B A Chandran
- Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Saad O Atiq
- Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Dilara Akbulut
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Ninet Sinaii
- Biostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology Service, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Nicholas I Simon
- Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Abdul Rouf Banday
- Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Salah Boudjadi
- Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Sandeep Gurram
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Amin H Nassar
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | | | - Gisela Butera
- Division of Library Services, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Min Yuen Teo
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Guru Sonpavde
- Medical Oncology, AdventHealth Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | | | - Andrea B Apolo
- Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kasi PM, Bucheit LA, Liao J, Starr J, Barata P, Klempner SJ, Gandara D, Shergill A, Madeira da Silva L, Weipert C, Zhang N, Pretz C, Hardin A, Kiedrowski LA, Odegaard JI. Pan-Cancer Prevalence of Microsatellite Instability-High (MSI-H) Identified by Circulating Tumor DNA and Associated Real-World Clinical Outcomes. JCO Precis Oncol 2023; 7:e2300118. [PMID: 37769226 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Immune checkpoint inhibitors are approved for advanced solid tumors with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H). Although several technologies can assess MSI-H status, detection and outcomes with circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-detected MSI-H are lacking. As such, we examined pan-cancer MSI-H prevalence across 21 cancers and outcomes after ctDNA-detected MSI-H. METHODS Patients with advanced cancer who had ctDNA testing (Guardant360) from October 1, 2018, to June 30, 2022, were retrospectively assessed for prevalence. GuardantINFORM, which includes anonymized genomic and structured payer claims data, was queried to assess outcomes. Patients who initiated new treatment within 90 days of MSI-H detection were sorted into immunotherapy included in treatment (IO) or no immunotherapy included (non-IO) groups. Real-world time to treatment discontinuation (rwTTD) and real-world time to next treatment (rwTTNT) were assessed in months as proxies of progression-free survival (PFS); real-world overall survival (rwOS) was assessed in months. Cox regression tests analyzed differences. Colorectal cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), prostate cancer, gastroesophageal cancer, and uterine cancer (UC) were assessed independently; all other cancers were grouped. RESULTS In total, 1.4% of 171,881 patients had MSI-H detected. Of 770 patients with outcomes available, rwTTD and rwTTNT were significantly longer for patients who received IO compared with non-IO for all cancers (P ≤ .05; hazard ratio [HR] range, 0.31-0.52 and 0.25-0.54, respectively) except NSCLC. rwOS had limited follow-up for all cohorts except UC (IO 39 v non-IO 23 months; HR, 0.18; P = .004); however, there was a consistent trend toward prolonged OS in IO-treated patients. CONCLUSION These data support use of a well-validated ctDNA assay to detect MSI-H across solid tumors and suggest prolonged PFS in patients treated with IO-containing regimens after detection. Tumor-agnostic, ctDNA-based MSI testing may be reliable for rapid decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Pedro Barata
- Case Western Reserve University/University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - David Gandara
- UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|