Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in isolated dystonia: A 3-year follow-up study

How Long Does Deep Brain Stimulation Give Patients Benefit?

INTRODUCTION

One of the most common questions patients ask when they are contemplating deep brain stimulation (DBS) is how long it will last. To guide physicians in answering this query, we performed a scoping review to assess the current state of the literature and to identify the gaps that need to be addressed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors performed a MEDLINE search inclusive of articles from January 1987 (advent of DBS literature) to June 2023 including human and modeling studies written in English. For longevity of therapy data, only studies with a mean follow-up of ≥three years were included. Using the Rayyan platform, two reviewers (JP and RM) performed a title screen. Of the 734 articles, 205 were selected by title screen and 109 from abstract review. Ultimately, a total of 122 articles were reviewed. The research questions we explored were 1) how long can the different components of the DBS system maintain functionality? and 2) how long can DBS remain efficacious in treating Parkinson's disease (PD), essential tremor (ET), dystonia, and other disorders?

RESULTS

We showed that patients with PD, ET, and dystonia maintain a considerable long-term benefit in motor scores seven to ten years after implant, although the percentage improvement decreases over time. Stimulation off scores in PD and ET show worsening, consistent with disease progression. Battery life varies by the disease treated and the programming settings used. There remains a paucity of literature after ten years, and the impact of new device technology has not been classified to date.

CONCLUSION

We reviewed existing data on DBS longevity. Overall, outcomes data after ten years of therapy are substantially limited in the current literature. We recommend that physicians who have data for patients with DBS exceeding this duration publish their results.

Prediction of subthalamic stimulation efficacy on isolated dystonia via support vector regression

Introduction

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of subthalamic nucleus (STN) has been well-established and increasingly applied in patients with isolated dystonia. Nevertheless, the surgical efficacy varies among patients. This study aims to explore the factors affecting clinical outcomes of STN-DBS on isolated dystonia and establish a well-performed prediction model.

Methods

In this prospective study, thirty-two dystonia patients were recruited and received bilateral STN-DBS at our center. Their baseline characteristics and up to one-year follow-up outcomes were assessed. Implanted electrodes of each subject were reconstructed with their contact coordinates and activated volumes calculated. We explored correlations between distinct clinical characteristics and surgical efficacy. Those features were then trained for the model in outcome prediction via support vector regression (SVR) algorithm and testified through cross-validation.

Results

Patients demonstrated an average clinical improvement of 56 ± 25 % after STN-DBS, significantly affected by distinct symptom forms and activated volumes. The optimal targets and activated volumes were concentratedly located at the dorsal posterior region to STN. Most patients had a rapid response to STN-DBS, and their motor score improvement within one week was highly associated with long-term outcomes. The trained SVR model, contributed by distinct weights of features, could reach a maximum prediction accuracy with mean errors of 11 ± 7 %.

Conclusion

STN-DBS demonstrated significant and rapid therapeutic effects in patients with isolated dystonia, by possibly affecting the pallidofugal fibers. Early improvement highly indicates the ultimate outcomes. SVR proves valid in outcome prediction. Patients with predominant phasic and generalized symptoms, shorter disease duration, and younger onset age may be more favorable to STN-DBS in the long run.

Focused Ultrasound for Treatment of Movement Disorders: A Review of Non-Food and Drug Administration Approved Indications

INTRODUCTION

MRI-guided focused ultrasound (FUS) is an incisionless thermo-ablative procedure that may be used to treat medication-refractory movement disorders, with a growing number of potential anatomic targets and clinical applications. As of this article's publication, the only US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved uses of FUS for movement disorders are thalamotomy for essential tremor (ET) and tremor-dominant Parkinson's Disease (PD), and pallidotomy for other cardinal symptoms of PD. We present a state-of-the-art review on all non-FDA approved indications of FUS for movement disorders, beyond the most well-described indications of ET and PD. Our objective was to summarize the safety and efficacy of FUS in this setting and provide a roadmap for future directions of FUS for movement disorders.

METHODS

A state-of-the-art review was conducted on use of FUS for non-FDA approved movement disorders. All movement disorders excluding FDA-approved uses for ET and PD were included.

RESULTS

A total of 25 studies on 172 patients were included. In patients with tremor plus dystonia syndromes (n = 6), ventralis intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (VIM)-FUS gave >50% tremor reduction, with no improvement in dystonia and worsened dystonia in 2/6 patients. Ventral-oralis complex (VO)-FUS gave >50% improvement for focal hand dystonia (n = 6) and 100% return to musical performance in musician's dystonia (n = 6). In patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and tremor (n = 3), improvement in tremor was seen in 2 patients with a favorable skull density ratio; no MS disease change was noted after VIM-FUS. In patients with tremor and comorbid ataxia syndromes (n = 3), none were found to have worsened ataxia after VIM-FUS; all had clinically significant tremor improvement. Subthalamic nucleus (STN)-FUS for PD (n = 49) gave approximately 50% improvement in PD motor symptoms, with dystonia and mild dyskinesias as possible adverse effects. Cerebellothalamic tract (CTT-FUS) for ET (n = 42) gave 55-90% tremor improvement, with gait dysfunction as a rare persistent adverse effect. Pallidothalamic tract (PTT-FUS) for PD (n = 50) gave approximately 50% improvement in motor symptoms, with mild speech dysfunction as a possible adverse effect.

CONCLUSION

VIM-FUS appeared safe and effective for heterogenous tremor etiologies, and VO-FUS appeared most effective for isolated segmental dystonia. STN-FUS was effective for PD symptom reduction; postoperative dystonia and mild on-medication dyskinesias required medical management. Tractography-based targeting with CTT-FUS for ET and PTT-FUS for PD demonstrated promising early results. Larger prospective trials with long-term follow-up are needed to the evaluate the safety and efficacy non-FDA approved indications for FUS.

Long-Term Outcome of Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Generalized Isolated Dystonia

OBJECTIVES

Few studies have focused on subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for refractory isolated dystonia, and the long-term outcomes are unclear. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of subthalamic stimulation for generalized isolated dystonia for more than five years and explored the factors predicting clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 16 patients with generalized isolated dystonia underwent a two-phase procedure for stimulation system implantation. After implanting the leads, we performed a test stimulation and observed the stimulation response. The severity of dystonia was assessed using a blinded rating of the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale based on videos recorded at scheduled times.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 7.4 ± 2.2 years (5-12.5 years). The severity of dystonia improved significantly one year after surgery. The movement score decreased from 49.3 (40.9) points at baseline to 26.5 (43.5) points (-44.6%) at six months, 12.0 (22.5) points (-66.8%) at one year, 11.25 (17.6) points (-72.7%) at three years, and 12.5 (21.0) points (-72.6%) at the last follow-up. The improvement in motor symptoms resulted in a corresponding improvement in activities of daily living. Greater long-term outcomes were correlated with early stimulation responses, lower baseline movement scores, and female sex. When analyzed comprehensively, only the baseline movement score had meaningful predictive value for the outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that subthalamic stimulation is effective and durable in treating generalized isolated dystonia. The subthalamic nucleus may be an alternative target for the treatment of refractory dystonia. Patients with less severe motor symptoms may benefit more from this treatment.

PAllidal versus SubThalamic deep brain Stimulation for Cervical Dystonia (PASTS-CD): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been validated as a safe and effective treatment for refractory cervical dystonia (CD). Globus pallidus internus (GPi) and subthalamic nucleus (STN) are the two main stimulating targets. However, there has been no prospective study to clarify which target is the better DBS candidate for CD. The objective of this trial is to compare directly the efficacy and safety of GPi-DBS and STN-DBS, thereby instructing the selection of DBS target in clinical practice.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled study plans to enrol 98 refractory CD patients. Eligible CD patients will be randomly allocated to GPi-DBS group or STN-DBS group, with the DBS electrodes implanted into the posteroventral portion of GPi or the dorsolateral portion of STN, respectively. The primary outcome will be the improvement of symptomatic severity, measured by the changes in the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) severity subscale and the Tsui scale at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery. The secondary outcomes include the improvement of the TWSTRS-disability subscale, TWSTRS-pain subscale, quality of life, mental and cognitive condition, as well as the differences in stimulation parameters and adverse effects. In addition, this study intends to identify certain predictors of DBS efficacy for CD.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Chinese PLA General Hospital (S2022-613-01). The results of this study will be published in international peer-reviewed journals and shared in professional medical conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05715138.

The Challenge of Choosing the Right Stimulation Target for Dystonic Tremor-A Series of Instructive Cases

Background

Thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) is established for medically refractory tremor syndromes and globus pallidus stimulation (GPi-DBS) for medically refractory dystonia syndromes. For combined tremor and dystonia syndromes, the best target is unclear.

Objectives

We present four patients with two different profiles whose clinical course demonstrates that our current analysis of clinical symptomatology is not a sufficient predictor of surgical success.

Methods

Outcome parameters were assessed with observer-blinded video ratings and included the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin-Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS) and the Unified Dystonia Rating Scale (UDRS).

Results

Two patients with "predominant lateralized action tremor" of the hands and mild cervical dystonia showed no relevant tremor improvement after GPi-DBS, but UDRS improved (mean, 45%). Rescue ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (Vim)-DBS electrodes were implanted and both patients benefited significantly with a mean tremor reduction of 51%.Two other patients with "axial-predominant action tremor of the trunk and head" associated with cervical dystonia underwent bilateral Vim-DBS implantation with little effect on tremor (24% reduction in mean FTM-TRS total score) and no effect on dystonic symptoms. GPi rescue DBS was implanted and showed a significant effect on tremor (63% reduction in mean FTM-TRS) and dystonia (49% reduction in UDRS).

Conclusions

The diagnosis of dystonic tremor alone is not a sufficient predictor to establish the differential indication of GPi- or Vim-DBS. Further criteria (eg, proximal-distal distribution of tremor/dystonia) are needed to avoid rescue surgery in the future. On the other hand, the course of our patients encourages rescue surgery in such severely disabled patients if the first target fails.

Globus pallidus internus versus subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for isolated dystonia: A 3-year follow-up

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery targeting the globus pallidus internus (GPi) or the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is widely used in medication-refractory dystonia. However, evidence regarding target selection considering various symptoms remains limited. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of these two targets in patients with isolated dystonia.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated 71 consecutive patients (GPi-DBS group, n = 32; STN-DBS group, n = 39) with isolated dystonia. Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale scores and quality of life were evaluated preoperatively and at 1, 6, 12, and 36 months postoperatively. Cognition and mental status were assessed preoperatively and at 36 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Targeting the STN (STN-DBS) yielded effects within 1 month (65% vs. 44%; p = 0.0076) and was superior at 1 year (70% vs. 51%; p = 0.0112) and 3 years (74% vs. 59%; p = 0.0138). For individual symptoms, STN-DBS was preferable for eye involvement (81% vs. 56%; p = 0.0255), whereas targeting the GPi (GPi-DBS) was better for axis symptoms, especially for the trunk (82% vs. 94%; p = 0.015). STN-DBS was also favorable for generalized dystonia at 36-month follow-up (p = 0.04) and required less electrical energy (p < 0.0001). Disability, quality of life, and depression and anxiety measures were also improved. Neither target influenced cognition.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that the GPi and STN are safe and effective targets for isolated dystonia. The STN has the benefits of fast action and low battery consumption, and is superior for ocular dystonia and generalized dystonia, while the GPi is better for trunk involvement. These findings may offer guidance for future DBS target selection for different types of dystonia.

Identification and Management of Persistent Stimulation-Induced Dyskinesia Associated with STN DBS: The See-Saw Dilemma

Clinical vignette

A 73-year-old woman with Parkinson's disease (PD) underwent implantation of bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulators (STN-DBS) to address bilateral upper extremity medication-refractory tremor. Post-operatively, she experienced a "see-saw effect" where small increases in stimulation resulted in improvement in one symptom (tremor) with concurrent worsening in another (dyskinesia).

Clinical dilemma

SID is usually considered a positive predictor of DBS outcome. However, there are cases where SID cannot be optimized. Lead location and pre-operative characteristics may contribute to this adverse effect. If the combination of programming and medication adjustments fails to resolve SID, what can be done to "rescue" the outcome?

Clinical solution

Management of SID requires a gradual and steadfast programming approach. Post-operative lead localization can guide advanced programming and decision-making. Rescue surgical interventions may be considered.

Gap in knowledge

In cases where SID is persistent despite deploying persistent optimization strategies, there is limited guidance on next steps.

DYT-TOR1A dystonia: an update on pathogenesis and treatment

DYT-TOR1A dystonia is a neurological disorder characterized by involuntary muscle contractions and abnormal movements. It is a severe genetic form of dystonia caused by mutations in the TOR1A gene. TorsinA is a member of the AAA + family of adenosine triphosphatases (ATPases) involved in a variety of cellular functions, including protein folding, lipid metabolism, cytoskeletal organization, and nucleocytoskeletal coupling. Almost all patients with TOR1A-related dystonia harbor the same mutation, an in-frame GAG deletion (ΔGAG) in the last of its 5 exons. This recurrent variant results in the deletion of one of two tandem glutamic acid residues (i.e., E302/303) in a protein named torsinA [torsinA(△E)]. Although the mutation is hereditary, not all carriers will develop DYT-TOR1A dystonia, indicating the involvement of other factors in the disease process. The current understanding of the pathophysiology of DYT-TOR1A dystonia involves multiple factors, including abnormal protein folding, signaling between neurons and glial cells, and dysfunction of the protein quality control system. As there are currently no curative treatments for DYT-TOR1A dystonia, progress in research provides insight into its pathogenesis, leading to potential therapeutic and preventative strategies. This review summarizes the latest research advances in the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of DYT-TOR1A dystonia.

Subthalamic deep brain stimulation for primary dystonia: defining an optimal location using the medial subthalamic nucleus border as anatomical reference

Introduction

Although the subthalamic nucleus (STN) has proven to be a safe and effective target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the treatment of primary dystonia, the rates of individual improvement vary considerably. On the premise of selecting appropriate patients, the location of the stimulation contacts in the dorsolateral sensorimotor area of the STN may be an important factor affecting therapeutic effects, but the optimal location remains unclear. This study aimed to define an optimal location using the medial subthalamic nucleus border as an anatomical reference and to explore the influence of the location of active contacts on outcomes and programming strategies in a series of patients with primary dystonia.

Methods

Data from 18 patients who underwent bilateral STN-DBS were retrospectively acquired and analyzed. Patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively (1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and last follow-up after neurostimulator initiation) using the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (for cervical dystonia) and the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (for other types). Optimal parameters and active contact locations were determined during clinical follow-up. The position of the active contacts relative to the medial STN border was determined using postoperative stereotactic MRI.

Results

The clinical improvement showed a significant negative correlation with the y-axis position (anterior-posterior; A+, P-). The more posterior the electrode contacts were positioned in the dorsolateral sensorimotor area of the STN, the better the therapeutic effects. Cluster analysis of the improvement rates delineated optimal and sub-optimal groups. The optimal contact coordinates from the optimal group were 2.56 mm lateral, 0.15 mm anterior, and 1.34 mm superior relative to the medial STN border.

Conclusion

STN-DBS was effective for primary dystonia, but outcomes were dependent on the active contact location. Bilateral stimulation contacts located behind or adjacent to Bejjani's line were most likely to produce ideal therapeutic effects. These findings may help guide STN-DBS preoperative planning, stimulation programming, and prognosis for optimal therapeutic efficacy in primary dystonia.

Dystonia and Parkinson's disease: Do they have a shared biology?

Parkinsonism and dystonia co-occur across many movement disorders and are most encountered in the setting of Parkinson's disease. Here we aim to explore the shared neurobiological underpinnings of dystonia and parkinsonism through the clinical lens of the conditions in which these movement disorders can be seen together. Foregrounding the discussion, we briefly review the circuits of the motor system and the neuroanatomical and neurophysiological aspects of motor control and highlight their relevance to the proposed pathophysiology of parkinsonism and dystonia. Insight into shared biology is then sought from dystonia occurring in PD and other forms of parkinsonism including those disorders in which both can be co-expressed simultaneously. We organize these within a biological schema along with important questions to be addressed in this space.

What have we learned about the biology of dystonia from deep brain stimulation?

Deep brain stimulation has dramatically changed the management of patients with dystonia, therapeutic approach of dystonia with marked improvement of dystonia and functional disability. However, despite decades of experience and identification of good prognosis factors, prediction of beneficial effect at the individual level is still a challenge. There is inter-individual variability in therapeutic outcome. Genetic factors are identified but subgroups of patients still have relapse or worsening of dystonia in short or long term. Possible "biological factors" underlying such a difference among patients are discussed, including structural or functional differences including altered plasticity.

Subthalamic Nucleus Stimulation-Induced Local Field Potential Changes in Dystonia

BACKGROUND

Subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation is an effective treatment for Parkinson's disease and induced local field potential (LFP) changes that have been linked with clinical improvement. STN stimulation has also been used in dystonia although the internal globus pallidus is the standard target where theta power has been suggested as a physiomarker for adaptive stimulation.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to explore if enhanced theta power was also present in STN and if stimulation-induced spectral changes that were previously reported for Parkinson's disease would occur in dystonia.

METHODS

We recorded LFPs from 7 patients (12 hemispheres) with isolated craniocervical dystonia whose electrodes were placed such that inferior, middle, and superior contacts covered STN, zona incerta, and thalamus.

RESULTS

We did not observe prominent theta power in STN at rest. STN stimulation induced similar spectral changes in dystonia as in Parkinson's disease, such as broadband power suppression, evoked resonant neural activity (ERNA), finely-tuned gamma oscillations, and an increase in aperiodic exponents in STN-LFPs. Both power suppression and ERNA localize to STN. Based on this, single-pulse STN stimulation elicits evoked neural activities with largest amplitudes in STN, which are relayed to the zona incerta and thalamus with changing characteristics as the distance from STN increases.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that STN stimulation-induced spectral changes are a nondisease-specific response to high-frequency stimulation, which can serve as placement markers for STN. This broadens the scope of STN stimulation and makes it an option for other disorders with excessive oscillatory peaks in STN. © 2022 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Rescue procedure for isolated dystonia after the secondary failure of globus pallidus internus deep brain stimulation

Introduction

Globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is widely used in patients with dystonia. However, 10–20% of patients receive insufficient benefits. The objectives of this study are to evaluate the effectiveness of bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS along with unilateral posteroventral pallidotomy (PVP) in patients with dystonia who experienced unsatisfactory GPi-DBS and to address the reported rescue procedures after suboptimal DBS or lesion surgery in dystonia patients.

Methods

Six patients with isolated dystonia who had previously undergone bilateral GPi-DBS with suboptimal improvement were included. Standardized assessments of dystonia using the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) and quality of life using SF-36 were evaluated before surgery and 1, 6 months, and last follow-up (LFU) after surgery. STN bilateral OFF (bi-OFF), unilateral ON (uni-ON), and bilateral ON (bi-ON) states were recorded at LFU. Specific items were used to find publications published before 10 April 2022 regarding rescue procedures after suboptimal DBS or lesion surgery in patients with dystonia for reference. Eleven original studies including case reports/series were identified for discussion.

Results

Substantial clinical benefits were achieved in all six patients. Significant amelioration was achieved during the 1-month (6.5 ± 7.45; p = 0.0049), 6-month (5.67 ± 6.3; p = 0.0056) follow-ups, and at LFU (4.67 ± 4.72; p = 0.0094) when compared with the baseline (LFU of GPi DBS with on status) (17.33 ± 11.79) assessed by BFMDRS. The percentage of improvement reached 70.6, 74.67, and 77.05%, respectively. At LFU, significant differences were found between the stimulation bi-OFF and uni-ON (11.08 ± 8.38 vs. 9 ± 8.52, p = 0.0191), and between the stimulation bi-OFF and bi-ON (11.08 ± 8.38 vs. 4.67 ± 4.72, p = 0.0164). Trends depicting a better improvement in stimulation bi-ON compared with uni-ON (4.67 ± 4.72 vs. 9 ± 8.52, p = 0.0538) were observed.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that bilateral STN-DBS plus unilateral PVP may be an effective rescue procedure for patients with isolated dystonia who experienced suboptimal movement improvement following GPi-DBS. However, given the heterogeneity of patients and the small sample size, these findings should be interpreted with caution.

Deep brain stimulation in dystonia: factors contributing to variability in outcome in short and long term follow-up

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is currently the most effective treatment for medically refractory dystonia with globus pallidus internus (GPi) usually the preferred target. Despite the overall success of DBS in dystonia, there remains variability in treatment outcome in both short and long-term follow-up, due to various factors. Factors contributing to variability in outcome comprise 'Dystonia Related' including dystonia classification, semiology, duration, body distribution, orthopaedic deformity, aetiology and genetic cause. The majority of these factors are identifiable from clinical assessment, brain MRI and genetic testing, and therefore merit careful preoperative consideration. 'DBS related' factors include brain target, accuracy of lead placement, stimulation parameters, time allowed for response, neurostimulation technology employed and DBS induced side-effects. In this review, factors contributing to variability in short and long-term dystonia DBS outcome are reviewed and discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

The recognition of differential DBS benefit in monogenic dystonia, increasing experience with subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS and in DBS for Meige syndrome, elucidation of DBS side effects and novel neurophysiological and imaging techniques to assist in predicting clinical outcome.

SUMMARY

Improved understanding of factors contributing to variability of DBS outcome in dystonia may assist in patient selection and predicting surgical outcomes.

Bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for refractory isolated cervical dystonia

Subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been proven to be an alternative target choice for refractory isolated cervical dystonia (CD). However, assessments of its short and long-term safety, efficacy, and sustained effectiveness have been limited to few reports. Here, we evaluated nine consecutive refractory isolated CD patients who underwent bilateral STN DBS and accepted to short and long-term follow-up in this retrospective study. Seven time points were used to see the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) scores (pre-operation [baseline], 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months post-operation and last follow-up) to assess improvement of dystonic symptoms. The 36-item Short-Form General Health Survey (SF-36) scores obtained at pre-operation and last follow-up to assess the changes in quality of life. All patients tolerated surgery well and acquired observable clinical benefits from STN DBS therapy. All patients achieved a considerable improvement in quality of life at the last follow-up. The hardware-related adverse events can be tolerated and the stimulation-related adverse events can be ameliorated by programming. Our data support the idea that bilateral STN DBS is a safety and effective method for the treatment of refractory isolated CD, with persistent and remarkable improvement in both movement and quality of life.

Both subthalamic and pallidal deep brain stimulation are effective for GNAO1-associated dystonia: three case reports and a literature review

Background

Mutations in the G-protein subunit alpha o1 (GNAO1) gene have recently been shown to be involved in the pathogenesis of early infantile epileptic encephalopathy and movement disorders. The clinical manifestations of GNAO1-associated movement disorders are highly heterogeneous. However, the genotype-phenotype correlations in this disease remain unclear, and the treatments for GNAO1-associated movement disorders are still limited.

Objective

The objective of this study was to explore diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for GNAO1-associated movement disorders.

Methods

This study describes the cases of three Chinese patients who had shown severe and progressive dystonia in the absence of epilepsy since early childhood. We performed genetic analyses in these patients. Patients 1 and 2 underwent globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) implantation, and Patient 3 underwent subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS implantation. In addition, on the basis of a literature review, we summarized and discussed the clinical characteristics and outcomes after DBS surgery for all reported patients with GNAO1-associated movement disorders.

Results

Whole-exome sequencing (WES) analysis revealed de novo variants in the GNAO1 gene for all three patients, including a splice-site variant (c.724-8G > A) in Patients 1 and 3 and a novel heterozygous missense variant (c.124G > A; p. Gly42Arg) in Patient 2. Both GPi and STN DBS were effective in improving the dystonia symptoms of all three patients.

Conclusion

DBS is effective in ameliorating motor symptoms in patients with GNAO1-associated movement disorders, and both STN DBS and GPi DBS should be considered promptly for patients with sustained refractory GNAO1-associated dystonia.

Unilateral pallidothalamic tractotomy at Forel's field H1 for cervical dystonia

Background

Neurosurgical ablation of Forel's field H1 for cervical dystonia, which is currently abandoned, was formerly used in the 1960s–1970s. Regardless of the lack of neuroimaging modalities and objective evaluation scales, the reported efficacy was significant. Although recent studies have reappraised the ablation of the pallidothalamic tract at Forel's field H1 for Parkinson's disease, the efficacy for cervical dystonia has not been investigated well.

Methods

Data of 35 patients with cervical dystonia who underwent unilateral pallidothalamic tractotomy at Forel's field H1 were retrospectively analyzed. The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) scores, the neck score of the Burke–Fahn–Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS), and adverse events were evaluated preoperatively and at the last available follow‐up period.

Results

The mean clinical follow‐up period was 13.9 ± 6.5 months. The mean TWSTRS total scores were 34.3 ± 14.0 preoperatively and 18.4 ± 16.5 at the last available follow‐up period (46.4% improvement, p < 0.0001). The BFMDRS neck score also improved significantly from 6.2 ± 2.9 preoperatively to 2.8 ± 2.8 at the last available follow‐up period (55.0% improvement on the neck score, p < 0.0001). Reduced hand dexterity in seven patients, hypophonia in five patients, dysarthria in four patients, and executive dysfunction in one patient were confirmed as adverse events at the last available follow‐up evaluation. One patient had postoperative hemorrhage.

Conclusion

The current study confirmed significant improvement in TWSTRS total scores and BFMDRS neck scores at the 13.9‐month follow‐up after unilateral pallidothalamic tractotomy. The pallidothalamic tract in Forel's field H1 is expected to be an alternative treatment target for cervical dystonia.

Dual Pallidal and Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Complex Ipsilateral Dystonia

PURPOSE

Globus pallidus pars interna (GPi) has become an established target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in dystonia. Previous studies suggest that targeting the ventralis oralis (Vo) complex nucleus improves dystonic tremor or even focal dystonia. Research has also demonstrated that multi-target DBS shows some benefits over single target DBS. In this study, we reviewed patients who had undergone unilateral DBS targeting the GPi and Vo.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five patients diagnosed with medically refractory upper extremity dystonia (focal or segmental) underwent DBS. Two DBS electrodes each were inserted unilaterally targeting the ipsilateral GPi and Vo. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) and Disability Rating Scale.

RESULTS

BFMDRS scores decreased by 55% at 1-month, 56% at 3-month, 59% at 6-month, and 64% at 12-month follow up. Disability Rating Scale scores decreased 41% at 1-month, 47% at 3-month, 50% at 6-month, and 60% at 12-month follow up. At 1 month after surgery, stimulating both targets improved clinical scores better than targeting GPi or Vo alone.

CONCLUSION

Unilateral thalamic and pallidal dual electrode DBS may be as effective or even superior to DBS of a single target for dystonia. Although the number of patients was small, our results reflected favorable clinical outcomes.

Should the Globus Pallidus Targeting Be Refined in Dystonia?

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

 Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) is a highly effective therapy for primary generalized and focal dystonias, but therapeutic success is compromised by a nonresponder rate of up to 20%. Variability in electrode placement and in tissue stimulated inside the GPi may explain in part different outcomes among patients. Refinement of the target within the pallidal area could be helpful for surgery planning and clinical outcomes. The objective of this study was to discuss current and potential methodological (somatotopy, neuroimaging, and neurophysiology) aspects that might assist neurosurgical targeting of the GPi, aiming to treat generalized or focal dystonia.

METHODS

 We selected published studies by searching electronic databases and scanning the reference lists for articles that examined the anatomical and electrophysiologic aspects of the GPi in patients with idiopathic/inherited dystonia who underwent functional neurosurgical procedures.

RESULTS

 The sensorimotor sector of the GPi was the best target to treat dystonic symptoms, and was localized at its lateral posteroventral portion. The effective volume of tissue activated (VTA) to treat dystonia had a mean volume of 153 mm³ in the posterior GPi area. Initial tractography studies evaluated the close relation between the electrode localization and pallidothalamic tract to control dystonic symptoms.Regarding the somatotopy, the more ventral, lateral, and posterior areas of the GPi are associated with orofacial and cervical representation. In contrast, the more dorsal, medial, and anterior areas are associated with the lower limbs; between those areas, there is the representation of the upper limb. Excessive pallidal synchronization has a peak at the theta band of 3 to 8 Hz, which might be responsible for generating dystonic symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

 Somatotopy assessment of posteroventral GPi contributes to target-specific GPi sectors related to segmental body symptoms. Tractography delineates GPi output pathways that might guide electrode implants, and electrophysiology might assist in pointing out areas of excessive theta synchronization. Finally, the identification of oscillatory electrophysiologic features that correlate with symptoms might enable closed-loop approaches in the future.

Surgical Management for Dystonia: Efficacy of Deep Brain Stimulation in the Long Term

Introduction: Dystonia is a movement disorder substantially affecting the quality of life. Botulinum Neurotoxin (BoNT) is used intramuscularly as a treatment for dystonia; however, not all dystonia patients respond to this treatment. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for Parkinson’s disease (PD) and essential tremor, but it can help in dystonia as well. Objectives: We studied a total of 67 dystonia patients who were treated with DBS over a period of 7 years to find out the long-term efficacy of DBS in those patients. First, we calculated patient improvement in post-surgery follow-up programs using the Global Dystonia Severity scale (GDS) and Burke–Fahn–Marsden dystonia rating scale (BFMDRS). Secondly, we analyzed the scales scores to see if there was any statistical significance. Methods: In our study we analyzed patients with ages from 38 to 78 years with dystonia who underwent DBS surgery between January 2014 and December 2020 in four different centers (India, Kuwait, Egypt, and Turkey). The motor response to DBS surgery was retrospectively measured for each patient during every follow-up visit using the GDS and the BFMDRS scales. Results: Five to 7 years post-DBS, the mean reduction in the GDS score was 30 ± 1.0 and for the BFMDRS score 26 ± 1.0. The longitudinal change in scores at 12 and 24 months post-op was also significant with mean reductions in GDS and BFMDRS scores of 68 ± 1.0 and 56 ± 1.0, respectively. The p-values were <0.05 for our post-DBS dystonia patients. Conclusions: This study illustrates DBS is an established, effective treatment option for patients with different dystonias, such as generalized, cervical, and various brain pathology-induced dystonias. Although symptoms are not completely eliminated, continuous improvements are noticed throughout the post-stimulation time frame.

Embedded adaptive deep brain stimulation for cervical dystonia controlled by motor cortex theta oscillations

Dystonia is a disabling movement disorder characterized by excessive muscle contraction for which the underlying pathophysiology is incompletely understood and treatment interventions limited in efficacy. Here we utilize a novel, sensing-enabled, deep brain stimulator device, implanted in a patient with cervical dystonia, to record local field potentials from chronically implanted electrodes in the sensorimotor cortex and subthalamic nuclei bilaterally. This rechargeable device was able to record large volumes of neural data at home, in the naturalistic environment, during unconstrained activity. We confirmed the presence of theta (3-7 Hz) oscillatory activity, which was coherent throughout the cortico-subthalamic circuit and specifically suppressed by high-frequency stimulation. Stimulation also reduced the duration, rate and height of theta bursts. These findings motivated a proof-of-principle trial of a new form of adaptive deep brain stimulation - triggered by theta-burst activity recorded from the motor cortex. This facilitated increased peak stimulation amplitudes without induction of dyskinesias and demonstrated improved blinded clinical ratings compared to continuous DBS, despite reduced total electrical energy delivered. These results further strengthen the pathophysiological role of low frequency (theta) oscillations in dystonia and demonstrate the potential for novel adaptive stimulation strategies linked to cortico-basal theta bursts.

Deep Brain Stimulation for Pediatric Dystonia

Dystonia is one of the most common pediatric movement disorders and can have a profound impact on the lives of children and their caregivers. Response to pharmacologic treatment is often unsatisfactory. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as a promising treatment option for children with medically refractory dystonia. In this review we highlight the relevant literature related to DBS for pediatric dystonia, with emphasis on the background, indications, prognostic factors, challenges, and future directions of pediatric DBS.

A practical guide to troubleshooting pallidal deep brain stimulation issues in patients with dystonia

High frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the internal portion of the globus pallidus has, in the last two decades, become a mainstream therapy for the management of medically-refractory dystonia syndromes. Such increasing uptake places an onus on movement disorder physicians to become familiar with this treatment modality, in particular optimal patient selection for the procedure and how to troubleshoot problems relating to sub-optimal efficacy and therapy-related side effects. Deep brain stimulation for dystonic conditions presents some unique challenges. For example, the frequent lack of immediate change in clinical status following stimulation alterations means that programming often relies on personal experience and local practice rather than real-time indicators of efficacy. Further, dystonia is a highly heterogeneous disorder, making the development of unifying guidelines and programming algorithms for DBS in this population difficult. Consequently, physicians may feel less confident in managing DBS for dystonia as compared to other indications e.g. Parkinson's disease. In this review, we integrate our years of personal experience of the programming of DBS systems for dystonia with a critical appraisal of the literature to produce a practical guide for troubleshooting common issues encountered in patients with dystonia treated with DBS, in the hope of improving the care for these patients.

The Efficacy and Predictors of Using GPi-DBS to Treat Early-Onset Dystonia: An Individual Patient Analysis

Objective

To compare the efficacy in patients with different genotypes, identify the potential predictive factors, and summarize the complications of globus pallidus deep brain stimulation (GPi-DBS) treating early-onset dystonia.

Methods

Three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases) were searched with no publication data restriction. The primary outcomes were the improvements in Burke–Fahn–Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale motor (BFMDRS-M) and disability (BFMDRS-D) score. Pearson's correlation coefficients and a metaregression analysis were used to identify the potential predictive factors. This article was registered in Prospero (CRD42020188527).

Results

Fifty-four studies (231 patients) were included. Patients showed significant improvement rate in BFMDRS-M (60.6%, p < 0.001) and BFMDRS-D (57.5%, p < 0.001) scores after treatment with GPi-DBS. BFMDRS-M score improved greater in the DYT-1-positive (p = 0.001) and DYT-11-positive (p = 0.008) patients compared to DYT-6-positive patients. BFMDRS-D score improved greater in the DYT-11 (+) compared to DYT-6 (+) patients (p = 0.010). The relative change of BFMDRS-M (p = 0.002) and BFMDRS-D (p = 0.010) scores was negatively correlated with preoperative BFMDRS-M score. In the metaregression analysis, the best predictive model showed that preoperative BFMDRS-M, disease duration (p = 0.047), and the age at symptom onset (p = 0.027) were important.

Conclusion

Patients with early-onset dystonia have a significant effect after GPi-DBS treatment, and DYT-1 (+) and DYT-11 (+) patients are better candidates for GPi-DBS. Lower preoperative score, later age of onset, and an earlier age at surgery probably predict better clinical outcomes.

Arching deep brain stimulation in dystonia types

Although medical treatment including botulinum toxic injection is the first-line treatment for dystonia, response is insufficient in many patients. In these patients, deep brain stimulation (DBS) can provide significant clinical improvement. Mounting evidence indicates that DBS is an effective and safe treatment for dystonia, especially for idiopathic and inherited isolated generalized/segmental dystonia, including DYT-TOR1A. Other inherited dystonia and acquired dystonia also respond to DBS to varying degrees. For Meige syndrome (craniofacial dystonia), other focal dystonia, and some rare inherited dystonia, further evidences are still needed to evaluate the role of DBS. Because short disease duration at DBS surgery and absence of fixed musculoskeletal deformity are associated with better outcome, DBS should be considered as early as possible when indicated after careful evaluation including genetic work-up. This review will focus on the factors to be considered in DBS for patients with dystonia and the outcome of DBS in the different types of dystonia.

Weight Change After Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients With Isolated Dystonia

Purpose: Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) is an effective treatment method for advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) and isolated dystonia and provides marked improvement of major motor symptoms. In addition, non-motor effects have been reported including weight gain (WG) in patients with PD after STN-DBS. However, it is still unclear whether patients with isolated dystonia also experience WG. Methods: Data from 47 patients with isolated dystonia who underwent bilateral STN-DBS surgery between October 2012 and June 2019 were retrospectively collected. The severity of dystonia was assessed via the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS). Changes in the body mass index (BMI) and BFMDRS score were analyzed using paired Student's t-tests. Regression analysis was performed to identify factors that affected the BMI after surgery. Results: Postoperative WG was observed in 78.7% of patients. The percentage of overweight and obese patients increased from 25.5% (before STN-DBS) to 48.9% (at the last follow-up). The mean BMI and mean percentage change in BMI increased by 1.32 ± 1.83 kg/m2 (P < 0.001) and 6.28 ± 8.34%, respectively. BMI increased more in female than in male patients. At the last follow-up, BFMDRS movement and disability scores improved by 69.76 ± 33.23% and 65.66 ± 31.41%, respectively (both P < 0.001). The final regression model analysis revealed that sex and preoperative BMI alone were independently associated with BMI change (P < 0.05). Conclusions: STN-DBS is associated with postoperative WG with patients with isolated dystonia. WG is more prominent in female patients and is associated with preoperative weight but not with the efficacy of STN-DBS on motor symptoms.

Long-term effects of pallidal and thalamic deep brain stimulation in myoclonus dystonia

OBJECTIVE

Observational study to evaluate long-term effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) and the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus (VIM) on patients with medically refractory myoclonus dystonia (MD).

BACKGROUND

More recently, pallidal as well as thalamic DBS have been applied successfully in MD but long-term data are sparse.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of seven MD patients with either separate (n = 1, VIM) or combined GPi- DBS and VIM-DBS (n = 6). Myoclonus, dystonia and disability were rated at baseline (BL), short-term (ST-FU) and long-term follow-up (LT-FU) using the United Myoclonus Rating Scale, Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) and Tsui rating scale, respectively. Quality of life (QoL) and mood were evaluated using the SF-36 and Beck Depression Inventory questionnaires, respectively.

RESULTS

Patients reached a significant reduction of myoclonus at ST-FU (62% ± 7.3%; mean ± SE) and LT-FU (68% ± 3.4%). While overall motor BFMDRS changes were not significant at LT-FU, patients with GPi-DBS alone responded better and predominant cervical dystonia ameliorated significantly up to 54% ± 9.7% at long-term. Mean disability scores significantly improved by 44% ± 11.4% at ST-FU and 58% ± 14.8% at LT-FU. Mood and QoL remained unchanged between 5 and up to 20 years postoperatively. No serious long-lasting stimulation-related adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

We present a cohort of MD patients with very long follow-up of pallidal and/or thalamic DBS that supports the GPi as the favourable stimulation target in MD with safe and sustaining effects on motor symptoms (myoclonus>dystonia) and disability.

Asleep Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients With Isolated Dystonia: Stereotactic Accuracy, Efficacy, and Safety

OBJECTIVES

Lead placement for deep brain stimulation (DBS) is routinely performed using neuroimaging or microelectrode recording (MER). Recent studies have demonstrated that DBS under general anesthesia using an imaging-guided target technique ("asleep" DBS) can be performed accurately and effectively with lower surgery complication rates than the MER-guided target method under local anesthesia ("awake" DBS). This suggests that asleep DBS may be a more acceptable method. However, there is limited direct evidence focused on isolated dystonia using this method. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes and targeting accuracy in patients with dystonia who underwent asleep DBS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined 56 patients (112 leads) with isolated dystonia who underwent asleep DBS targeting in the globus pallidus internus (GPi) and subthalamic nucleus (STN). The Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) scores were assessed preoperatively and at 12-month follow-up (12 m-FU). The lead accuracy was evaluated by comparing the coordinates of the preoperative plan with those of the final electrode implantation location. Other measures analyzed included stimulation parameters and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

For both GPi and STN cohorts, mean BFMDRS motor scores were significantly lower at 12 m-FU (8.9 ± 10.9 and 4.6 ± 5.7 points) than at baseline (22.6 ± 16.4 and 16.1 ± 14.1 points, p < 0.001). The mean difference between the planned target and the distal contact of the leads was 1.33 ± 0.54 mm for the right brain electrodes and 1.50 ± 0.57 mm for the left, determined by Euclidian distance. No perioperative complications or AEs related to the device were observed during the complete follow-up. However, AEs associated with stimulation occurred in 12 and 6 patients in the GPi and STN groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Asleep DBS may be an accurate, effective, and safe method for treating patients with isolated dystonia regardless of the stimulation target.

Similar Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Deep Brain Stimulation With Different Electrode Targets for Primary Meige Syndrome: One Institution's Experience of 17 Cases

OBJECTIVE

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is considered an effective and safe treatment for patients with primary Meige syndrome (MS). Both the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus pars internus (Gpi) have been shown to be optional targets for electrode implantation to improve clinical symptoms, but the relationship between clinical outcomes and target is still unclear. The current study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of DBS with different electrode targets for primary MS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective study to assess the clinical outcomes for 17 consecutive patients with primary MS in Wuhan Union Hospital from January 2016 to September 2019. Six patients were treated by Gpi-DBS and 11 patients were treated by STN-DBS. All patients were assessed before surgery and at the last follow-up after surgery. The Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) including the movement and disability scales was used to evaluate the dystonia severity of the eyes, the mouth, speech, and swallowing. The median follow-up duration was 30.1 ± 13.1 months (range 6 months-52 months).

RESULTS

In our study, DBS improved the BFMDRS-M scores by 70.52 ± 7.45% and the BFMDRS-D scores by 70.51 ± 8.38% for patients with MS. STN-DBS and Gpi-DBS had similar effects not only on the BFMDRS-M and BFMDRS-D scores, but also on the subitems including eyes, mouth, speech, and swallowing. The stimulation voltage for the Gpi was significantly higher than that for the STN. The improvements were similar in the general anesthesia and local anesthesia groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The curative effects of STN-DBS and Gpi-DBS on patients with primary MS are similar. Both the STN and Gpi could be effective targets of DBS for primary MS.

Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients with Prior Bilateral Pallidotomy and Selective Peripheral Denervation for Treatment of Dystonia

INTRODUCTION

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus has become an accepted treatment for severe isolated idiopathic and inherited dystonia. Patients who had other forms of surgery earlier, such as radiofrequency lesioning or selective peripheral denervation, however, usually are not considered candidates for DBS.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of pallidal DBS in a rare subgroup of patients who had undergone both pallidotomy and selective peripheral denervation previously with a waning effect over the years.

METHODS

Pallidal DBS was performed according to a prospective study protocol in 2 patients with isolated idiopathic dystonia, and patients were followed for a period of at least 6 years.

RESULTS

Both patients benefitted from long-lasting amelioration of dystonia after pallidal DBS, which was comparable to that of patients who did not have previous surgeries. In a 62-year-old female with cervical dystonia both the Burke-Fahn-Marsden (BFM) and the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) motor scores were improved at follow-up 8 years after surgery (50 and 39%). In a 32-year-old male with generalized dystonia, the BFM motor and disability scores showed marked improvement at 6.5 years of follow-up (82 and 66%).

CONCLUSIONS

Pallidal DBS can yield marked and long-lasting improvement in patients who underwent both pallidotomy and selective peripheral denervation earlier. Therefore, such patients, in general, should not be excluded from DBS.

Treatment of Dystonia: Medications, Neurotoxins, Neuromodulation, and Rehabilitation

Dystonia is a complex disorder with numerous presentations occurring in isolation or in combination with other neurologic symptoms. Its treatment has been significantly improved with the advent of botulinum toxin and deep brain stimulation in recent years, though additional investigation is needed to further refine these interventions. Medications are of critical importance in forms of dopa-responsive dystonia but can be beneficial in other forms of dystonia as well. Many different rehabilitative paradigms have been studied with variable benefit. There is growing interest in noninvasive stimulation as a potential treatment, but with limited long-term benefit shown to date, and additional research is needed. This article reviews existing evidence for treatments from each of these categories. To date, there are many examples of incomplete response to available treatments, and improved therapies are needed.

Stimulation-Induced Dyskinesia After Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients With Meige Syndrome

OBJECTIVES

Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) is increasingly used to treat Meige syndrome (MS) and markedly improves symptoms. Stimulation-induced dyskinesia (SID), which adversely affects surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction, may, however, occur in some patients. This study attempts to explore possible causes of SID.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospectively collected clinical data on 32 patients who underwent STN-DBS between October 2016 and April 2019 were analyzed. Clinical outcomes were assessed pre- and post-surgery, using the Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia rating scale (BFMDRS). Patients were divided into a dyskinesia group and a non-dyskinesia group, according to whether or not they experienced persistent SID during follow-up. The coordinates of the active contacts were calculated from post-operative computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, using the inter-commissural line as a reference. At final follow-up, the main stimulatory parameters for further study included pulse width, voltage, and frequency.

RESULTS

At final follow-up (mean = 16.3 ± 7.2 months), MS patients had improved BFMDRS total scores compared with pre-surgical scores (mean improvement = 79.0%, p < 0.0001). The mean improvement in BFMDRS total scores in the dyskinesia (n = 10) and non-dyskinesia (n = 22) groups were 81.6 ± 8.8% and 77.9 ± 14.2%, respectively. The mean minimum voltage to induce dyskinesia was 1.7 ± 0.3 V. The programmed parameters of both groups were similar. When compared with the non-dyskinesia group, active stimulatory contact coordinates in the dyskinesia group were inferior (mean left side: z = -2.3 ± 1.7 mm vs. z = -1.2 ± 1.5 mm; p = 0.0282; mean right side: z = -2.7 ± 1.9 mm vs. z = -2.3 ± 1.7 mm; p = 0.0256). The x and y coordinates were similar.

CONCLUSION

STN-DBS is an effective intervention for MS, providing marked improvements in clinical symptoms; SID may, however occur in the subsequent programming control process. Comparing patients with/without dyskinesia, the active contacts were located closer to the inferior part of the STN in patients with dyskinesia, which may provide an explanation for the dyskinesia.

Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Post-Infarct Dystonia

Dystonia secondary to cerebral infarcts presents months to years after the initial insult, is usually unilateral and causes significant morbidity. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) is established as the most frequent target in the management of the dystonic symptoms. We report our experience with subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS in 3 patients with post-infarct dystonia, in whom GPi DBS was not confidently possible due to the presence of striatal infarcts. Two patients had unilateral STN DBS implantation, whereas the third patient had bilateral STN DBS implantation for bilateral dystonic symptoms. Prospectively collected preoperative and postoperative functional assessment data including imaging, medication and neuropsychology evaluations were analyzed with regard to symptom improvement. Median follow-up period was 38.3 months (range 26–43 months). All patients had clinically valuable improvements in dystonic symptoms and pain control despite variable improvements in the Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia rating scores. In our series, we have demonstrated that STN DBS could be an alternative in the management of post-infarct dystonia in patients with abnormal striatal anatomy which precludes GPi DBS. A multidisciplinary team-based approach is essential for patient selection and management.

Deep brain stimulation and recordings: Insights into the contributions of subthalamic nucleus in cognition

Recent progress in targeted interrogation of basal ganglia structures and networks with deep brain stimulation in humans has provided insights into the complex functions the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Beyond the traditional role of the STN in modulating motor function, recognition of its role in cognition was initially fueled by side effects seen with STN DBS and later revealed with behavioral and electrophysiological studies. Anatomical, clinical, and electrophysiological data converge on the view that the STN is a pivotal node linking cognitive and motor processes. The goal of this review is to synthesize the literature to date that used DBS to examine the contributions of the STN to motor and non-motor cognitive functions and control. Multiple modalities of research have provided us with an enhanced understanding of the STN and reveal that it is critically involved in motor and non-motor inhibition, decision-making, motivation and emotion. Understanding the role of the STN in cognition can enhance the therapeutic efficacy and selectivity not only for existing applications of DBS, but also in the development of therapeutic strategies to stimulate aberrant circuits to treat non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease and other disorders.

What is the true discharge rate and pattern of the striatal projection neurons in Parkinson's disease and Dystonia?

Dopamine and striatal dysfunctions play a key role in the pathophysiology of Parkinson's disease (PD) and Dystonia, but our understanding of the changes in the discharge rate and pattern of striatal projection neurons (SPNs) remains limited. Here, we recorded and examined multi-unit signals from the striatum of PD and dystonic patients undergoing deep brain stimulation surgeries. Contrary to earlier human findings, we found no drastic changes in the spontaneous discharge of the well-isolated and stationary SPNs of the PD patients compared to the dystonic patients or to the normal levels of striatal activity reported in healthy animals. Moreover, cluster analysis using SPN discharge properties did not characterize two well-separated SPN subpopulations, indicating no SPN subpopulation-specific (D1 or D2 SPNs) discharge alterations in the pathological state. Our results imply that small to moderate changes in spontaneous SPN discharge related to PD and Dystonia are likely amplified by basal ganglia downstream structures.

Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation on Swallowing Function: A Systematic Review

The effect of deep brain stimulation (DBS) on swallowing function in movement disorders is unclear. Here, we systematically reviewed this topic by searching keywords following PICOS strategy of problem (swallowing or swallow or dysphagia or aspiration) and intervention (deep brain stimulation, or DBS) in the PubMed and Web of Science in English in April 2020, with comparators [subthalamic nucleus (STN), globus pallidus interna (GPi), ventralis intermedius, (ViM), post-subthalamic area, or caudal zona incerta (PSA/cZi); ON/OFF DBS state/settings, ON/OFF medication state, Parkinson's disease (PD), dystonia, tremor], outcomes (swallowing function measures, subjective/objective) and study types (good quality original studies) in mind. We found that STN DBS at usual high-frequency stimulation could have beneficial effect (more so on subjective measures and/or OFF medication), no effect, or detrimental effect (more so on objective measures and/or ON medication) on swallowing function in patients with PD, while low-frequency stimulation (LFS) could have beneficial effect on swallowing function in patients with freezing of gait. GPi DBS could have a beneficial effect (regardless of medication state and outcome measures) or no effect, but no detrimental effect, on swallowing function in PD. GPi DBS also has beneficial effects on swallowing function in majority of the studies on Meige syndrome but not in other diseases with dystonia. PSA/cZi DBS rarely has detrimental effect on swallowing functions in patients with PD or tremor. There is limited information on ViM to assess. Information on swallowing function by DBS remains limited. Well-designed studies and direct comparison of targets are further needed.

Phenomenology and Management of Subthalamic Stimulation-Induced Dyskinesia in Patients With Isolated Dystonia

Background

The pallidum has been the preferred DBS target for dystonia, but recent studies have shown equal or greater improvement in patients implanted in the STN.¹ Transient stimulation-induced dyskinesia (SID) is frequently observed when stimulating this novel target, and there are no previously published video case reports of this phenomenon.

Cases

We describe in detail the SID phenomenology experienced by 4 patients who had been implanted with STN DBS for isolated dystonia.

Conclusions

SID can occur in focal, segmental, axial, or generalized distribution, can resemble levodopa-induced dyskinesia choreiform or dystonic movements observed in Parkinson's disease, and is generally transient and resolves with customized DBS programming. Providers should be aware that SID can occur after STN DBS when treating isolated dystonia and not assume movements are the result of worsening or spread of the underlying dystonia.

Predictive factors of outcome in cervical dystonia following deep brain stimulation: an individual patient data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) therapy has been suggested to be a beneficial alternative in cervical dystonia (CD) for patients who failed nonsurgical treatments. This individual patient data meta-analysis compared the efficacy of DBS in the globus pallidus internus (GPi) versus subthalamic nucleus (STN) and identified possible predictive factors for CD.

METHODS

Three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase and Web of Science) were searched for studies with no publication date restrictions. The primary outcomes were normalized by calculating the relative change in TWSTRS total scores and subscale scores at the last follow-up. Data were analyzed mainly using Pearson's correlation coefficients and a stepwise multivariate regression analysis.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies (86 patients, 58 with GPi-DBS and 28 with STN-DBS) were eligible. Patients showed significant improvement in the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) (52.5 ± 11.6 vs 21.9 ± 14.9, P < 0.001) scores at the last follow-up (22.0 ± 14.3 months), compared with scores at baseline, with a mean improvement of 56.6% (P < 0.001) (54.9% in severity, 63.2% in disability, 41.7% in pain). There was no significant difference in the improvement (%) of the total TWSTRS scores in 3 years for the GPI and STN groups (58.1 ± 22.6 vs 47.5 ± 39.2, P > 0.05). Age at surgery and age at symptom onset were negatively correlated with the relative changes in TWSTRS scores at the last follow-up, while there was a positive correlation with preoperative TWSTRS scores. On the stepwise multivariate regression, only the age at surgery remained significant in the best predictive model.

CONCLUSIONS

GPi-DBS and STN-DBS both provided a common great improvement in the symptoms of CD patients in 3 years. Earlier age at surgery may probably indicate larger improvement. More randomized large-scale clinical trials are warranted in the future.

Deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus internus versus the subthalamic nucleus in isolated dystonia

OBJECTIVE

Surgical procedures involving deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) or subthalamic nucleus (STN) are well-established treatments for isolated dystonia. However, selection of the best stimulation target remains a matter of debate. The authors' objective was to compare the effectiveness of DBS of the GPi and the STN in patients with isolated dystonia.

METHODS

In this matched retrospective cohort study, the authors searched an institutional database for data on all patients with isolated dystonia who had undergone bilateral implantation of DBS electrodes in either the GPi or STN in the period from January 30, 2014, to June 30, 2017. Standardized assessments of dystonia and health-related quality of life using the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) and SF-36 were conducted before and at 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery. No patients were lost to the 6-month follow-up; 5 patients were lost to the 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Both GPi (14 patients) and STN (16 patients) stimulation produced significant improvement in dystonia and quality of life in all 30 patients found in the database search. At the 1-month follow-up, however, the percentage improvement in the BFMDRS total movement score was significantly (p = 0.01) larger after STN DBS (64%) than after GPi DBS (48%). At the 12-month follow-up, the percentage improvement in the axis subscore was significantly (p = 0.03) larger after GPi DBS (93%) than after STN DBS (83%). Also, the total amount of electrical energy delivered was significantly (p = 0.008) lower with STN DBS than with GPi DBS (124 ± 52 vs 192 ± 65 μJ, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The GPi and STN are both effective targets in alleviating dystonia and improving quality of life. However, GPi stimulation may be better for patients with axial symptoms. Moreover, STN stimulation may produce a larger clinical response within 1 month after surgery and may have a potential economic advantage in terms of lower battery consumption.

Defining research priorities in dystonia

OBJECTIVE

Dystonia is a complex movement disorder. Research progress has been difficult, particularly in developing widely effective therapies. This is a review of the current state of knowledge, research gaps, and proposed research priorities.

METHODS

The NIH convened leaders in the field for a 2-day workshop. The participants addressed the natural history of the disease, the underlying etiology, the pathophysiology, relevant research technologies, research resources, and therapeutic approaches and attempted to prioritize dystonia research recommendations.

RESULTS

The heterogeneity of dystonia poses challenges to research and therapy development. Much can be learned from specific genetic subtypes, and the disorder can be conceptualized along clinical, etiology, and pathophysiology axes. Advances in research technology and pooled resources can accelerate progress. Although etiologically based therapies would be optimal, a focus on circuit abnormalities can provide a convergent common target for symptomatic therapies across dystonia subtypes. The discussions have been integrated into a comprehensive review of all aspects of dystonia.

CONCLUSION

Overall research priorities include the generation and integration of high-quality phenotypic and genotypic data, reproducing key features in cellular and animal models, both of basic cellular mechanisms and phenotypes, leveraging new research technologies, and targeting circuit-level dysfunction with therapeutic interventions. Collaboration is necessary both for collection of large data sets and integration of different research methods.

Predictive factors for outcome of pallidal deep brain stimulation in cervical dystonia

OBJECTIVE

Primary cervical dystonia (CD) is characterized by abnormal contractions of neck muscles. Globus pallidus internus deep brain stimulation (GPi-DBS) is recognized as an effective therapy for patients with refractory CD, but the prognostic factors need further research. Our study investigated the predictive factors of clinical outcomes in CD patients who underwent GPi-DBS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients (n = 23) who underwent GPi-DBS at Chinese PLA General Hospital from March 2012 to April 2018 were included in our analysis. Their scores of Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) and Tsui were acquired at baseline and at the last follow-up visit. Percent improvement in these scores were compared between the categorical variables. Correlations between outcomes and continuous demographic and clinical variables were calculated.

RESULTS

Patients showed significant improvement in TWSTRS total (55.71 %), severity (48.75 %), disability (57.05 %), pain (63.67 %) scores and total Tsui score (46.07 %, all P ﹤0.001). Follow-up duration was positively correlated with percent improvement in TWSTRS total (rho = 0.594, P =  0.003), severity (rho = 0.581, P =  0.004) and disability (rho = 0.470, P =  0.023) scores. No significant differences in the outcomes were found between any pair of the categorical variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Follow-up duration was the only independent factor correlated to the outcomes of GPi-DBS for CD patients. However, follow-up duration is an indefinite factor prior to surgery, thus further studies are needed before the final conclusions of prognostic factors are established.

Treatment of dystonia and tics

Treatment of dystonia and tics continues to evolve. In dystonia, while oral agents such as benzodiazepines, baclofen and anticholinergics remain in use, botulinum toxin (BoNT) continues to be regarded as the treatment of choice for focal and segmental dystonia, but new preparations are being studied. While deep brain stimulation (DBS) has typically focused on targeting the globus pallidus internus (GPi) when treating dystonia, more recent research has expanded the targets to include subthalamic nucleus (STN) and other targets. In addition to DBS, thalamotomies continue to show therapeutic benefit in focal hand dystonias. Treatment of tics includes a growing armamentarium of options besides the three FDA-approved drugs, all dopamine receptor blockers (haloperidol, pimozide and aripiprazole). Because of lower risk of adverse effects, dopamine depleters (e.g. tetrabebazine, deutetrabenazine, and valbenazine), along with novel D1 receptor antagonists, are currently studied as treatment alternatives in patients with tics. Practice guidelines for the treatment of tics and Tourette syndrome have been recently updated. Data regarding the use of DBS in treatment of tics remains relatively sparse, but international registries have expanded our understanding of the effect of stimulation at several targets.