1
|
Altmann A, Aksman LM, Oxtoby NP, Young AL, Alexander DC, Barkhof F, Shoai M, Hardy J, Schott JM. Towards cascading genetic risk in Alzheimer's disease. Brain 2024; 147:2680-2690. [PMID: 38820112 PMCID: PMC11292901 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awae176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease typically progresses in stages, which have been defined by the presence of disease-specific biomarkers: amyloid (A), tau (T) and neurodegeneration (N). This progression of biomarkers has been condensed into the ATN framework, in which each of the biomarkers can be either positive (+) or negative (-). Over the past decades, genome-wide association studies have implicated ∼90 different loci involved with the development of late-onset Alzheimer's disease. Here, we investigate whether genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease contributes equally to the progression in different disease stages or whether it exhibits a stage-dependent effect. Amyloid (A) and tau (T) status was defined using a combination of available PET and CSF biomarkers in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative cohort. In 312 participants with biomarker-confirmed A-T- status, we used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate the contribution of APOE and polygenic risk scores (beyond APOE) to convert to A+T- status (65 conversions). Furthermore, we repeated the analysis in 290 participants with A+T- status and investigated the genetic contribution to conversion to A+T+ (45 conversions). Both survival analyses were adjusted for age, sex and years of education. For progression from A-T- to A+T-, APOE-e4 burden showed a significant effect [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.88; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.70-4.89; P < 0.001], whereas polygenic risk did not (HR = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.84-1.42; P = 0.53). Conversely, for the transition from A+T- to A+T+, the contribution of APOE-e4 burden was reduced (HR = 1.62; 95% CI: 1.05-2.51; P = 0.031), whereas the polygenic risk showed an increased contribution (HR = 1.73; 95% CI: 1.27-2.36; P < 0.001). The marginal APOE effect was driven by e4 homozygotes (HR = 2.58; 95% CI: 1.05-6.35; P = 0.039) as opposed to e4 heterozygotes (HR = 1.74; 95% CI: 0.87-3.49; P = 0.12). The genetic risk for late-onset Alzheimer's disease unfolds in a disease stage-dependent fashion. A better understanding of the interplay between disease stage and genetic risk can lead to a more mechanistic understanding of the transition between ATN stages and a better understanding of the molecular processes leading to Alzheimer's disease, in addition to opening therapeutic windows for targeted interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andre Altmann
- UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Leon M Aksman
- Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Neil P Oxtoby
- UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Alexandra L Young
- UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Daniel C Alexander
- UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands
| | - Maryam Shoai
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
- UK Dementia Research Institute, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - John Hardy
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
- UK Dementia Research Institute, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Jonathan M Schott
- UK Dementia Research Institute, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, WC1N 3AR, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lorenzini L, Collij LE, Tesi N, Vilor-Tejedor N, Ingala S, Blennow K, Foley C, Frisoni GB, Haller S, Holstege H, van der van der Lee S, Martinez-Lage P, Marioni RE, McCartney DL, O' Brien J, Oliveira TG, Payoux P, Reinders M, Ritchie C, Scheltens P, Schwarz AJ, Sudre CH, Waldman AD, Wolz R, Chatelat G, Ewers M, Wink AM, Mutsaerts HJMM, Gispert JD, Visser PJ, Tijms BM, Altmann A, Barkhof F. Alzheimer's disease genetic pathways impact cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers and imaging endophenotypes in non-demented individuals. Alzheimers Dement 2024. [PMID: 39073684 DOI: 10.1002/alz.14096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Unraveling how Alzheimer's disease (AD) genetic risk is related to neuropathological heterogeneity, and whether this occurs through specific biological pathways, is a key step toward precision medicine. METHODS We computed pathway-specific genetic risk scores (GRSs) in non-demented individuals and investigated how AD risk variants predict cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and imaging biomarkers reflecting AD pathology, cardiovascular, white matter integrity, and brain connectivity. RESULTS CSF amyloidbeta and phosphorylated tau were related to most GRSs. Inflammatory pathways were associated with cerebrovascular disease, whereas quantitative measures of white matter lesion and microstructure integrity were predicted by clearance and migration pathways. Functional connectivity alterations were related to genetic variants involved in signal transduction and synaptic communication. DISCUSSION This study reveals distinct genetic risk profiles in association with specific pathophysiological aspects in predementia stages of AD, unraveling the biological substrates of the heterogeneity of AD-associated endophenotypes and promoting a step forward in disease understanding and development of personalized therapies. HIGHLIGHTS Polygenic risk for Alzheimer's disease encompasses six biological pathways that can be quantified with pathway-specific genetic risk scores, and differentially relate to cerebrospinal fluid and imaging biomarkers. Inflammatory pathways are mostly related to cerebrovascular burden. White matter health is associated with pathways of clearance and membrane integrity, whereas functional connectivity measures are related to signal transduction and synaptic communication pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Lorenzini
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lyduine E Collij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Niccoló Tesi
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Genomics of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Aging, Human Genetics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Delft Bioinformatics Lab, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Natàlia Vilor-Tejedor
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
- Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Silvia Ingala
- Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Cerebriu A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kaj Blennow
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | | | - Giovanni B Frisoni
- Laboratory Alzheimer's Neuroimaging & Epidemiology, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
- University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Sven Haller
- CIMC - Centre d'Imagerie Médicale de Cornavin, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Radiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Henne Holstege
- Genomics of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Aging, Human Genetics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sven van der van der Lee
- Genomics of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Aging, Human Genetics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pablo Martinez-Lage
- Centro de Investigación y Terapias Avanzadas, Neurología, CITA-Alzheimer Foundation, San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Riccardo E Marioni
- Centre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Daniel L McCartney
- Centre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - John O' Brien
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Tiago Gil Oliveira
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
- ICVS/3B's - PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal
| | - Pierre Payoux
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
- ToNIC, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, University of Toulouse, Inserm, Toulouse, France
| | - Marcel Reinders
- Delft Bioinformatics Lab, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Craig Ritchie
- Edinburgh Dementia Prevention, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Outpatient Department 2, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Brain Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adam J Schwarz
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Carole H Sudre
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), University College London (UCL), London, UK
- MRC Unit for Lifelong Health & Ageing at UCL, University College London, London, UK
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Adam D Waldman
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Gael Chatelat
- Université de Normandie, Unicaen, Inserm, U1237, PhIND "Physiopathology and Imaging of Neurological Disorders", institut Blood-and-Brain @ Caen-Normandie, Cyceron, Caen, France
| | - Michael Ewers
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
| | - Alle Meije Wink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk J M M Mutsaerts
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Ghent Institute for Functional and Metabolic Imaging (GIfMI), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Juan Domingo Gispert
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), Madrid, Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pieter Jelle Visser
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Limburg, Department of Psychiatry & Neuropsychology, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Division of Neurogeriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Betty M Tijms
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andre Altmann
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Grari O, Elmoujtahide D, Sebbar E, Choukri M. The Biochemistry Behind Cognitive Decline: Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease. EJIFCC 2023; 34:276-283. [PMID: 38303754 PMCID: PMC10828533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most prevalent type of dementia. Pathologically, the disease is marked by neurofibrillary tangles (NFT), which are aberrant accumulations of the tau protein that develop inside neurons, and extracellular plaque deposits of the amyloid β peptide (Aβ). These pathological lesions are present in the brain before the beginning of clinical manifestations. However, despite advancements in the comprehension of AD pathophysiology, timely and accurate clinical diagnosis remains challenging. Therefore, developing biomarkers capable of detecting AD during the preclinical phase holds enormous promise for precise diagnosis since detecting the disease early is crucial because it enables interventions when treatments may be more effective. This article intends to provide a comprehensive review of AD biomarkers, discussing their significance, classification, and recent developments in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O. Grari
- : Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed I University, Oujda, Morocco
- : Department of Biochemistry, Mohammed VI University Hospital, Oujda, Morocco
| | - D. Elmoujtahide
- : Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed I University, Oujda, Morocco
- : Department of Biochemistry, Mohammed VI University Hospital, Oujda, Morocco
| | - E. Sebbar
- : Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed I University, Oujda, Morocco
- : Department of Biochemistry, Mohammed VI University Hospital, Oujda, Morocco
| | - M. Choukri
- : Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed I University, Oujda, Morocco
- : Department of Biochemistry, Mohammed VI University Hospital, Oujda, Morocco
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cai B, Shao N, Ye T, Zhou P, Si W, Song H, Wang G, Kou J. Phosphorylation of MAP 1A regulates hyperphosphorylation of Tau in Alzheimer's disease model. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2023; 49:e12934. [PMID: 37705167 DOI: 10.1111/nan.12934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Hyperphosphorylation of Tau is one of the important pathological features of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Therefore, studying the mechanisms behind Tau hyperphosphorylation is crucial in exploring the pathogenesis of neurological damage in AD. METHODS In this study, after the establishment of rat models of AD, quantitative phosphoproteomics and proteomics were performed to identify proteins, showing that phosphorylation of microtubule associated protein 1A (MAP 1A) was lower in the model group. Western blot confirmed the changes of MAP 1A in the SD rats, APP/PS1 transgenic mice and cell AD models. To further study the molecular mechanism of recombinant MAP 1A phosphorylation affecting Tau phosphorylation, interfering siRNA-MAP 1A and protein immunoprecipitation reaction analysis were performed in AD cell models. RESULTS Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (CDK5) showed reduced binding to MAP 1A and increased binding to Tau, resulting in a decrease in phosphorylated MAP 1A (p-MAP 1A) and an increase in phosphorylated Tau (p-Tau), and MAP 1A silencing promoted binding of CDK5-Tau and increased Tau phosphorylation, thereby reducing the cell survival rate. CONCLUSIONS In summary, we found that p-MAP 1A downregulation associated with p-Tau upregulation was due to their altered binding forces to CDK5, and MAP 1A could enhance autophosphorylation by competitive binding to CDK5 and antagonise Tau phosphorylation. This leads to neuronal protection and reducing tissue damage levels in AD, which can help better understand the mechanisms of AD pathogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biao Cai
- State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of TCM Evaluation and Translational Research, Department of Pharmacology of Chinese Material Medica, School of Traditional Chinese Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China
- Department of Biological Sciences, School of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, China
| | - Nan Shao
- Department of Biological Sciences, School of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, China
| | - Ting Ye
- Department of Biological Sciences, School of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, China
| | - Peng Zhou
- Department of Biological Sciences, School of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, China
| | - Wenwen Si
- Department of Biological Sciences, School of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, China
| | - Hang Song
- Department of Biological Sciences, School of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, China
| | - Guangyun Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of TCM Evaluation and Translational Research, Department of Pharmacology of Chinese Material Medica, School of Traditional Chinese Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China
- Department of Biological Sciences, School of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, China
| | - Junping Kou
- State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of TCM Evaluation and Translational Research, Department of Pharmacology of Chinese Material Medica, School of Traditional Chinese Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|