Carotid arteriography

Contrast-enhanced MR angiography is not more accurate than unenhanced 2D time-of-flight MR angiography for determining > or = 70% internal carotid artery stenosis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Internal carotid artery (ICA) atheromatous disease is an important cause of ischemic stroke, and endarterectomy or stent placement is typically indicated for symptomatic patients with > or = 70% stenosis. Our purpose was to compare contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) with unenhanced 2D time-of-flight MR angiography (2D TOF MRA) in detecting hemodynamically significant ICA stenosis, by using CT angiography (CTA) as the reference standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was an institutional review board-approved retrospective study. We identified 177 consecutive patients (354 ICAs) who received correlative CE-MRA, 2D TOF MRA, and CTA. Two neuroradiologists blinded to the CTA data graded the degree of ICA stenosis according to a 5-point scale. Additionally, luminal signal-intensity characteristics including 1) signal intensity drop-out, 2) distal-vessel narrowing, and 3) distal-vessel signal-intensity reduction were recorded. MRA results were correlated with those of CTA, and receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed.

RESULTS

On CTA, there were 55 ICAs with and 299 without > or = 70% stenosis. CE-MRA was 84% sensitive and 96% specific for detecting > or = 70% stenosis; 2D TOF MRA was 80% sensitive and 95% specific. The area under the ROC curve was 0.97 for CE-MRA and 0.95 for 2D TOF MRA (P = .51, not significant). For both MRA studies, each of the luminal signal-intensity characteristics had high specificity (> 98%) but poor-to-mild sensitivity (35%-66%) in detecting > or = 70% stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although it is established that CE-MRA more accurately delineates neurovascular anatomy than does unenhanced 2D TOF MRA, the administration of gadolinium did not offer a significant advantage in distinguishing surgically treatable ICA stenosis. This conclusion may be important in patients with contraindications to gadolinium.

Sonographic carotid plaque morphologic characteristics and vascular risk factors: results from a population study

OBJECTIVE

The role of vascular risk factors in atherosclerosis development is well established, whereas risk factors involved in determining plaque vulnerability are still a matter of debate. We investigated the vascular risk factor distribution in patients with carotid plaques.

METHODS

We consecutively assessed sonographic plaque morphologic characteristics, the degree of stenosis, and the common carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) in 1655 patients. Demographic data, a documented history of symptomatic cerebrovascular disease (CVD), and the presence of vascular risk factors were collected. According to literature, heterogeneous hypoechoic plaques with an irregular surface or ulcerations and those with a severe degree of stenosis (>or=70%) have been considered "complex" plaques at "major" risk of stroke; homogeneous hyperechoic plaques with smooth surface lesions have been considered "simple" plaques at minor risk.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis showed that all vascular risk factors were associated with the presence of carotid atherosclerotic lesions. Multiple logistic regression showed an independent association of hypertension and diabetes with complex plaques, which also had a thicker IMT. A history of CVD was observed more frequently in complex plaques, which had a higher stenosis percentage even after patients with a severe degree of stenosis (>or=70%) and indications for carotid surgery were excluded.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypertension and diabetes are related to a thicker IMT and more severe complex plaques, which may reflect the instability of atherosclerotic process. Because two-thirds of the patients with complex plaques were asymptomatic for CVD, this raises the importance of surveillance sonography to monitor plaque evolution for prevention of symptomatic CVD.

[Carotid stenosis: appropriate diagnosis and treatment]

Ischemic cerebral infarcts represent a serious health problem with important social and economic repercussions in the western world. The presence of carotid stenosis is one of the main risk factors for the appearance of cerebral infarcts. Carotid stenosis represents a challenge for the medical community, both because of the enormous amount of scientific information available and because of the constant advances in diagnostic procedures and especially in revascularization techniques for treatment. General radiologists as well as those specializing in vascular pathology need to have ample knowledge of how to reach the diagnosis and of the different treatment options for this pathology if they are to play a successful role in multidisciplinary teams dealing with carotid stenosis. This update aims to present the basic information that we consider to be essential in a simple way to enable radiologists to meet this challenge.

Functional Imaging of Carotid Atheromatous Plaques

Atherosclerotic plaque rupture within the internal carotid artery is an important cause of transient ischemic attack (TIA) and stroke. Conventional imaging techniques such as ultrasound and angiography provide information about the structural consequences of such plaques in terms of luminal stenosis. Most clinical trials of carotid surgery and stenting and based on these imaging methods. Techniques aimed at imaging the biological 'functional' status of the plaque are now emerging. Most of these are based on the premise that inflammatory activity is an index of plaque stability. In this article we review potential imaging targets from the known molecular biological pathways of atherosclerosis. Both conventional imaging techniques and the newer methods are discussed. Recent data from position emission tomography (PET) imaging and from the use of superparamagnetic iron oxide particles with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging are shown.

Utility of MRA and CTA in the evaluation of carotid occlusive disease

Cervical carotid artery atherosclerotic disease is an important cause of thromboembolic stroke. Noninvasive imaging techniques have become preferred in initial diagnostic workup. We review the current approach to carotid imaging, and the clinical utility and limitations of carotid computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). Future directions of these modalities, including carotid plaque imaging, are also discussed.

Safety and efficacy of carotid arteriography in vascular surgery practice

OBJECTIVE

Carotid arteriography (CA) is an important method of assessing carotid artery occlusive disease and is the best method of planning for carotid angioplasty and stent placement (CAS). This study compared the results of CA performed by vascular surgeons in a contemporary series against widely recognized interdisciplinary quality standards for this procedure. Although many vascular surgeons perform CA, there is a paucity of data about its safety, efficacy, and compliance with quality standards in vascular practice. The importance of quality CA will likely increase as CAS emerges to assume a broader clinical role.

METHOD

Carotid arteriograms performed by seven vascular surgeons at three institutions from September 2000 to May 2004 were reviewed. These results were compared with quality standards for the performance of CA.

RESULTS

Five hundred three carotid arteriograms were performed over 45 months. Indications for the procedure were extracranial cerebrovascular disease (86%), trauma (5%), and other conditions (9%). Indications for the procedure were appropriate in 100% of patients (as determined by guidelines document) and exceeded the recommended standard of appropriate indications in 99%. All procedures successfully provided the information required, exceeding the threshold of 98% for procedural success. Reversible neurologic deficits occurred in 0.6% (two transient ischemic attacks and one stroke) compared with the threshold of 2.5%. A permanent neurologic deficit occurred in 0.2% (1 patient) compared with the published guideline of 1% after carotid arteriography. Major non-neurologic complications occurred in 1.2% (6 patients), less than the standard of 2.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

The safety and efficacy of a contemporary series of CA performed in vascular surgery practice compared favorably with recognized interdisciplinary quality standards for this procedure. Ensuring safe and effective CA is likely to support the successful growth of CAS as a treatment option.