The Effect of Sex on the Minimum Local Analgesic Concentration of Ropivacaine for Caudal Anesthesia in Anorectal Surgery

Sex differences in pediatric caudal epidural anesthesia under sedation without primary airway instrumentation

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To identify sex differences associated with caudal epidurals, the most commonly used technique of pediatric regional anesthesia, based on individually validated data of ultrasound-guided blocks performed between 04/2014 and 12/2020.

METHODS

Prospectively collected and individually validated data of a cohort of children aged between 0-15 years was analyzed in a retrospective observational study. We included pediatric surgeries involving a primary plan of caudal epidural anesthesia under sedation (without airway instrumentation) and a contingency plan of general anesthesia. Sex-specific rates were analyzed for overall failure of the primary anesthesia plan, for residual pain, for block-related technical complications and for critical respiratory events. We used Fisher´s exact tests and multivariable logistic regressions were used to evaluate sex-specific associations.

RESULTS

Data from 487 girls and 2060 boys ≤15 years old (ASA status 1 to 4) were analyzed. The primary-anesthesia-plan failure rate was 5.5% (95%CI 3.8%-7.8%) (N = 27/487) among girls and 4.7% (95%CI 3.9%-5.7%) (N = 97/2060) among boys (p = 0.41). Residual pain was the main cause of failure, with rates of 4.5% (95%CI 2.9-6.6%) (N = 22/487) among girls and 3.0% (95%CI 2.3-3.8%) (N = 61/2060) among boys (p = 0.089). Block-related technical complications were seen at rates of 0.8% (95%CI 0.3%-1.9%) (N = 4/487) among girls vs 2.5% (95%CI 0.5-2.7%) (N = 51/2060) among boys and, hence, significantly more often among male patients (p = 0.023). Male sex was significantly associated with higher odds (adjusted OR: 3.18; 95% CI: 1.12-9; p = 0.029) for such technical complications regardless of age, ASA status, gestational week at birth or puncture attempts. Critical respiratory events occurred at a 1.7% (95%CI 1.2%-2.3%) rate (N = 35/2060) twice as high among boys as 0.8% (95%CI 0.3%-1.9%) (N = 4/487) among girls (p = 0.21).

CONCLUSIONS

While the the primary-anesthesia-plan failure rate was equal for girls and boys, technical complications and respiratory events are more likely to occur in boys.

The Minimum Effective Concentration (MEC95) of different volumes of ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided caudal epidural block: a dose-finding study

BACKGROUND

Caudal epidural block (CEB) may be beneficial in anorectal surgery because its use may extend postoperative analgesia. This dose-finding study aimed to estimate the minimum effective anesthetic concentrations for 95% patients(MEC95) of 20 ml or 25 ml of ropivacaine in with CEB.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this double-blind, prospective study, the concentration of ropivacaine administered in 20 ml and 25 ml for ultrasound-guided CEB were determined using the sample up-and-down sequential allocation study design of binary response variables. The first participant was given 0.5% ropivacaine. Depending on whether a block was successful or unsuccessful, the concentration of local anesthesia was decreased or increased by 0.025% in the next patient. Every five minutes for 30 min, the sensory blockade using a pin-prick sensation at S3 dermatome compared to at T6 dermatome were evaluated every 5 min within 30 min. An effective CEB was defined as a a reduction of sensation at S3 dermatome and the existence of flaccid anal sphincter. Anesthesia was considered successful if the surgeon could perform the surgery without additional anesthesia. We determined the MEC50 using the Dixon and Massey up-and-down method and estimated the MEC95 using probit regression.

RESULTS

The concentration of ropivacaine administered in 20 ml for CEB ranged from 0.2% to 0.5%. Probit regression with a bias-corrected Morris 95% CI derived by bootstrapping showed an MEC50 and MEC 50 of ropivacaine for anorectal surgical anesthesia were 0.27% (95% CI, 0.24 to 0.31) and 0.36%(95% CI, 0.32 to 0.61). The concentration of ropivacaine administered in 25 ml for CEB ranged from 0.175 to 0.5. Probit regression with a bias-corrected Morris 95% CI derived by bootstrapping showed an MEC50 and MEC95 for CEB were 0.24% (95% CI, 0.19 to 0.27) and 0.32% (95% CI, 0.28 to 0.54).

CONCLUSION

With ultrasound-guided CEB, the MEC95 of 0.36% ropivacaine at 20 ml and 0.32% ropivacaine at 25 ml provide adequate surgical anesthesia/analgesia 95% of patients undergoing anorectoal surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrails.gov: Retrospectively registered (ChiCTR2100042954; Registration date:1/2, 2021).

Study on MEV90 of 0.5% ropivacaine for US-guided caudal epidural block in anorectal surgery

Background

Choosing the appropriate concentration and volume of anesthetics is critical for a successful nerve block. The current study aimed to determine the minimum effective volume (MEV) of 0.5% ropivacaine for US-guided CEB in 90% of patients (MEV90) undergoing anorectal surgery. The aims were to reduce the occurrence of complications associated with a sacral blockade in anorectal surgery, broaden the indications for surgical procedures and treatment, and improve patient satisfaction. This study presents the groundwork for the development of individualized anesthetic programs. We believe that the study would serve as a reference for the use of caudal epidural block (CEB) in lower abdominal surgery for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia.

Methods

This study used a biased coin design (BCD) up-and-down method (UDM). We divided the participants into two groups based on gender, and each group independently performed the biased coin design up-and-down method. We used 0.5% ropivacaine for the first patient in each group; however, the volume was 10 ml for men and 8 ml for women. Therefore, the dose of anesthetics given to each patient was determined by the response of the previous patient. If the block of the previous patient failed, the volume was increased by 2 ml in the following patient. Otherwise, the next subject had an 11% chance of receiving a volume of 2 ml less or an 89% chance of receiving no volume change. We defined a successful block as painless surgery with anal sphincter relaxation 15 min after the drug injection. Enrollment was completed after 45 successful caudal blocks for each group.

Results

Caudal epidural block was successfully performed on 50 men and 49 women. The MEV90 of ropivacaine for CEB was calculated to be 12.88 ml (95% CI: 10.8-14 ml) for men and 10.73 ml (95% CI: 9.67-12 ml) for women. Men had a MEV99 of 13.88 ml (95% CI: 12.97-14 ml), and women had a MEV99 of 11.87 ml (95% CI: 11.72-12 ml).

Conclusion

With operability and general applicability, it is possible to increase the success rate of CEB for anorectal surgery to 99% as well as decrease the incidence of anesthesia-related complications. CEB can meet the needs of patients for rapid postoperative rehabilitation, improve patient satisfaction, and lay a solid foundation for postoperative analgesia.

The minimum effective concentration (MEC90) of ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided caudal block in anorectal surgery. A dose finding study

Background

Caudal epidural block (CEB) provides reliable anesthesia for adults undergoing anorectal surgery. Despite the widely utilization, the minimum effective concentration for 90% patients (MEC₉₀) of ropivacaine for CEB remains unknown.

Objective

To estimate MEC of ropivacaine for CEB in anorectal surgery.

Design

A prospective dose-finding study using biased coin design up-and-down sequential method.

Setting

Operating room and postoperative recovery area of Chengdu Shangjin Nanfu Hospital, from October 2019 to January 2020.

Patients

50 males and 51 females scheduled for anorectal surgery.

Interventions

We conducted two independent biased coin design up-and down trials by genders. The concentration of ropivacaine administered to the first patient of male and female were 0.25% with fixed volume of 14ml for male and 12ml for female patients based on our previous study. In case of failure, the concentration was increased by 0.05% in the next subject. Otherwise, the next subject was randomized to a concentration 0.05% less with a probability of 0.11, or the same concentration with a probability of 0.89. Success was defined as complete sensory blockade of perineal area 15 min after the block evidenced by the presence of a lax anal sphincter and pain-free surgery.

Main outcome measures

The MEC of ropivacaine to achieve a successful CEB in 90%(MEC₉₀) of the patients.

Results

The MEC₉₀ of ropivacaine for CEB were estimated to be 0.35% (95% CI 0.29 to 0.4%) for male and 0.353% (95%CI 0.22 to 0.4%) for female. By extrapolation to MEC in 99% of subjects (MEC99) and pooled adjacent violators algorithm (PAVA) adjusted responses, it would be optimal to choose 0.4% ropivacaine with a volume of 14ml for male and 12ml for female.

Conclusions

A concentration of 0.35% ropivacaine with a volume of 14ml provided a successful CEB in 90% of the male patients, while 0.353% ropivacaine with a volume of 12ml provided a successful CEB in 90% of the female patients. A concentration of 0.4% and a volume of 14ml for male and 12 ml for female would be successful in 99% of the patients.

Trial registration

Chictr.org.cn identifier: No. ChiCTR 1900024315.

Investigation of the Minimum Local Analgesic Concentration of Epidural Sufentanil Combined With Ropivacaine for Labor Analgesia

PURPOSE

Worldwide, there are only few studies focusing on labor analgesia on the MLAC (minimum local analgesic concentration) or EC50 (median effective concentration) of sufentanil and ropivacaine. Therefore, we determine the MLAC or EC50 of sufentanil and ropivacaine for epidural analgesia by using an up-down sequential allocation and survey its adverse effect in a prospective blinded randomized trial.

METHODS

Sixty nulliparous full-term parturients who required labor analgesia were recruited and randomly divided into the sufentanil and ropivacaine groups. The formulation was 25 μg sufentanil combined with 0.1% ropivacaine (added 0.9% normal saline to 75 ml). According to the response of a previous parturient, the dosage of sufentanil was increased or decreased by 5 μg in the sufetanil group; meanwhile, we also administrated an initial concentration of 0.1% ropivacaine combined with 22.5 μg sufentanil (added 0.9% normal saline to 75 ml) in the ropivacaine group. The concentration of ropivacaine was increased or decreased by 0.01% following the response of the previous parturient. The Brownlee up-down sequential allocation was used to estimate the MLAC of epidural ropivacaine and its 95% confidence intervals in labor analgesia.

FINDINGS

There were no significant changes for the two groups, including for age, height weight, active stage, second stage of labor, and gestational weeks (P = 0.769, 0.900, 0.603, 0.441, 0.577, and 0.695, respectively). The VAS scores of the parturient decreased to varying degrees (P < 0.0001) after labor analgesia compared with VAS before labor analgesia, and the most effective analgesia was reached in 60 min. The EC50 dose of epidural ropivacaine combined with 0.3 μg/mL sufentanil was 0.09687%, and the 95% CI was 0.08944%~0.1043%. Five parturients had PONV, and the incidence rate was 16.7%; one parturient had pruritus, so the incidence rate was 3.3%. The EC50 dose of epidural sulfetanil combined with 0.1% ropivacaine was 18.76 μg with a 95% confidence interval of 13.5-24.48 μg. There were no significant differences in the active stage, second stage of labor, and maternal and fetal hemodynamic data between the two groups. Notably, the Apgar scores for 1 min and 5 min were 10 scores for almost all of these patients. There were no significant differences between the two groups for maternal and fetal side effects, which had very low incidence rates.

IMPLICATIONS

The MLAC of epidural sufentanil or ropivacaine could provide satisfactory and safe analgesia for parturients while having a low incidence rate of side effects.

The Duration of Nerve Block from Local Anesthetic Formulations in Male and Female Rats

PURPOSE

It is unknown whether there are sex differences in response to free or encapsulated local anesthetics.

METHODS

We examined nerve block duration and toxicity following peripheral nerve blockade in male and female rats. We studied the local anesthetic bupivacaine (free or encapsulated) as well as tetrodotoxin, which acts on a different site of the same voltage-gated channel.

RESULTS

Sensory nerve blockade was 158.5 [139-190] minutes (median [interquartile range]) (males) compared to 173 [134-171] minutes (females) (p = 0.702) following bupivacaine injection, N = 8 male, 8 female. Motor nerve blockade was 157 [141-171] minutes (males) compared to 172 [146-320] minutes (females) (p = 0.2786). Micellar bupivacaine (N = 8 male, 8 female) resulted in sensory nerve blockade of 266 [227-320] minutes (males) compared to 285 [239-344] minutes (females) (p = 0.6427). Motor nerve blockade was 264 [251-264] minutes (males) compared to 287 [262-287] minutes (females) (p = 0.3823). Liposomal bupivacaine (N = 8 male, 8 female) resulted in sensory nerve blockade of 240 [207-277] minutes (males) compared to 289 [204-348] minutes (females) (p = 0.1654). Motor nerve blockade was 266 [237-372] minutes (males) compared to 317 [251-356] minutes (females) (p = 0.6671). Following tetrodotoxin injection (N = 12 male,12 female) sensory nerve blockade was 54.8 [5-117] minutes (males) compared to 54 [14-71] minutes (females) (p = 0.6422). Motor nerve blockade was 72 [40-112] minutes (males) compared to 64 [32-143] minutes (females) (p = 0.971).

CONCLUSIONS

We found no statistically significant sex differences associated with the formulations tested. In both sexes, durations of nerve block were similar between micellar and liposomal bupivacaine formulations, despite the micellar formulation containing less drug.

A Retrospective Study Evaluating the Effect of Low Doses of Perineural Dexamethasone on Ropivacaine Brachial Plexus Peripheral Nerve Block Analgesic Duration

Objective

Examination of the effectiveness of perineural dexamethasone administered in very low and low doses on ropivacaine brachial plexus block duration.

Design

Retrospective evaluation of brachial plexus block duration in a large cohort of patients receiving peripheral nerve blocks with and without perineural dexamethasone in a prospectively collected quality assurance database.

Setting

A single academic medical center.

Methods

A total of 1,942 brachial plexus blocks placed over a 16-month period were reviewed. Demographics, nerve block location, and perineural dexamethasone utilization and dose were examined in relation to block duration. Perineural dexamethasone was examined as none (0 mg), very low dose (2 mg or less), and low dose (greater than 2 mg to 4 mg). Continuous catheter techniques, local anesthetics other than ropivacaine, and block locations with fewer than 15 subjects were excluded. Associations between block duration and predictors of interest were examined using multivariable regression models. A subgroup analysis of the impact of receiving dexamethasone on block duration within each block type was also conducted using a univariate linear regression approach.

Results

A total of 1,027 subjects were evaluated. More than 90% of brachial plexus blocks contained perineural dexamethasone (≤4 mg), with a median dose of 2 mg. Increased block duration was associated with receiving any dose of perineural dexamethasone (P < 0.0001), female gender (P = 0.022), increased age (P = 0.048), and increased local anesthetic dose (P = 0.01). In a multivariable model, block duration did not differ with very low- or low-dose perineural dexamethasone after controlling for other factors (P = 0.420).

Conclusion

Perineural dexamethasone prolonged block duration compared with ropivacaine alone; however, duration was not greater with low-dose compared with very low-dose perineural dexamethasone.

Factors predictive of the onset and duration of action of local anesthesia in mandibular third-molar surgery: a prospective study

The aim of this study was to assess the influence of patients' and surgical variables on the onset and duration of action of local anesthesia (LA) in mandibular third-molar (M3) surgery. Patients scheduled for mandibular M3 surgery were considered for inclusion in this prospective cohort study. Patients' and surgical variables were recorded. Two per cent (2%) lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine was used to block the nerves for extraction of mandibular M3. Then, the onset of action and duration of LA were monitored. Univariate analysis and multivariate regression analysis were used to analyze the data. The final cohort included 88 subjects (32 men and 56 women; mean age ± SD = 29.3 ± 12.3 yr). With univariate analysis, age, gender, body mass index (BMI), smoking quantity and duration, operation time, and 'volume of local anesthetic needed' significantly influenced the onset of action and duration of LA. Multivariate regression revealed that age and smoking quantity were the only statistically significant predictors of the onset of action of LA, whereas age, smoking quantity, and 'volume of local anesthetic needed' were the only statistically significant predictors of duration of LA. Further studies are recommended to uncover other predictors of the onset of action and duration of LA.

Infant spinal anesthesia: Do girls need a larger dose of local anesthetic?

BACKGROUND

Gender differences in absorption, distribution, and metabolism of a number of anesthetic agents have been identified in adults. Clinically, adult studies suggest women demonstrate slower onset of opioid analgesic effects, lower spinal and epidural dose requirements, and greater sensitivity to neuromuscular blocking agents. Sex-related differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of local anesthetics in neonates and infants, however, have not been well documented. As a result, it is not known whether modification of the dose of local anesthetic for awake spinal anesthesia in infants is required.

AIMS

Our aim was to determine whether the ED50 and ED95 of local anesthetics used for infant spinal anesthesia are different between sexes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of data previously collected during dose-response studies of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine spinal anesthetics. The doses were reanalyzed using generalized linear regression analysis to determine whether there is a discernible difference in dose requirements between male and female infants.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty infant spinal anesthetics were reviewed. For levobupivacaine, the ED50 (95% CI) was 0.69 (0.49-0.88) mg vs 0.49 (0.33-0.65), whereas the ED95(95% CI) was 1.07 (0.73-1.41) vs 0.93 (0.64-1.22) for girls and boys, respectively. For ropivacaine spinal anesthesia, the ED50 (95% CI) was 0.64 (0.35-0.92) mg vs 0.30 (-0.32-0.92), whereas the ED95 (95% CI) was 1.30 (0.73-1.87) vs 1.66 (0.55-2.76) for girls and boys, respectively.

CONCLUSION

There is no evidence that sex differences occur at the ED50 dose range or at the clinically relevant ED95 dose. Modification of spinal anesthetic dose is not required for infant girls.

Factors Influencing Quality of Pain Management in a Physician Staffed Helicopter Emergency Medical Service

BACKGROUND

Pain is frequently encountered in the prehospital setting and needs to be treated quickly and sufficiently. However, incidences of insufficient analgesia after prehospital treatment by emergency medical services are reported to be as high as 43%. The purpose of this analysis was to identify modifiable factors in a specific emergency patient cohort that influence the pain suffered by patients when admitted to the hospital.

METHODS

For that purpose, this retrospective observational study included all patients with significant pain treated by a Swiss physician-staffed helicopter emergency service between April and October 2011 with the following characteristics to limit selection bias: Age > 15 years, numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain documented at the scene and at hospital admission, NRS > 3 at the scene, initial Glasgow coma scale > 12, and National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics score < VI. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate patient and mission characteristics of helicopter emergency service associated with insufficient pain management.

RESULTS

A total of 778 patients were included in the analysis. Insufficient pain management (NRS > 3 at hospital admission) was identified in 298 patients (38%). Factors associated with insufficient pain management were higher National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics scores, high NRS at the scene, nontrauma patients, no analgesic administration, and treatment by a female physician. In 16% (128 patients), despite ongoing pain, no analgesics were administered. Factors associated with this untreated persisting pain were short time at the scene (below 10 minutes), secondary missions of helicopter emergency service, moderate pain at the scene, and nontrauma patients. Sufficient management of severe pain is significantly better if ketamine is combined with an opioid (65%), compared to a ketamine or opioid monotherapy (46%, P = .007).

CONCLUSIONS

In the studied specific Swiss cohort, nontrauma patients, patients on secondary missions, patients treated only for a short time at the scene before transport, patients who receive no analgesic, and treatment by a female physician may be risk factors for insufficient pain management. Patients suffering pain at the scene (NRS > 3) should receive an analgesic whenever possible. Patients with severe pain at the scene (NRS ≥ 8) may benefit from the combination of ketamine with an opioid. The finding about sex differences concerning analgesic administration is intriguing and possibly worthy of further study.

Effective Concentration of Lidocaine Plus Fentanyl for Caudal Block in Patients Undergoing Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy

Objective. This study determined the effective concentration (EC) of lidocaine plus 75 μg fentanyl for caudal block in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy. Methods. Consecutive male patients scheduled for TRUS guided prostate biopsy were enrolled. The mixed solution for caudal block contained lidocaine and 75 μg fentanyl, in total 20 mL. The concentration of lidocaine was determined using the up-and-down method, starting at 0.8% (a step size of 0.1%). A successful caudal block was defined by no pain perception during biopsy. The EC50 of lidocaine for successful caudal block was calculated and side effects were evaluated. Results. A total of 23 patients were recruited. The EC50 of lidocaine for successful caudal block was 0.53%. Conclusions. Lidocaine of 0.53% combined with 75 μg fentanyl resulted in excellent caudal block in 50% of male patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.

Lack of Sex Difference in Minimum Local Analgesic Concentration of Ropivacaine for Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

Background

Sex differences, which may be an important variable for determining anesthetic requirements, have not been well investigated in the aspect of local anesthetic. This investigation aimed to compare the minimum local analgesic concentration (MLAC) of ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block (US-SCB) between men and women.

Material/Method

Patients aged 18–45 years undergoing elective forearm, wrist, or hand surgeries under US-SCB were divided into 2 groups according to sex. The initial concentration was 0.375% ropivacaine 20 mL and the concentration for the next patient was determined by the up-down technique at 0.025% intervals. Success was defined as the absence of any pain in response to a pinprick in the region of all 4 terminal nerves and the skin incision within 45 min. The primary outcome was the MLAC of ropivacaine, which was estimated by the Dixon and Massey method. The analgesia duration, which was defined as the time from the end of the US-SCB injection to the time of feeling discomfort and need for additional analgesics, was observed for each patient.

Results

The MLAC of ropivacaine 20 mL for US-SCB was 0.2675% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2512–0.2838%) in men and 0.2675% (95% CI, 0.2524–0.2826%) in women. There was no significant difference in MLAC or the analgesia duration between the 2 groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions

We found no significant sex-related differences in MLAC or analgesia duration of ropivacaine for US-SCB.

Sex differences in remifentanil requirements for preventing cough during anesthetic emergence

PURPOSE

Target-controlled infusion (TCI) of remifentanil can suppress coughing during emergence from general anesthesia; nevertheless, previous studies under different clinical conditions recommend significantly different effective effect-site concentrations (effective Ce) of remifentanil for 50% of patients (EC₅₀). The differences among these studies include type of surgery and patient sex. In recent years, study of sex differences in regards to anesthetic pharmacology has drawn greater interest. Accordingly, we attempted to determine the effective Ce of remifentanil for preventing cough for each sex under the same clinical conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty female and 25 male ASA physical status I-II grade patients between the ages of 20 and 46 years who were undergoing thyroidectomy were enrolled in this study. The effective Ce of remifentanil for preventing cough was determined for each sex using the isotonic regression method with a bootstrapping approach, following Dixon's up-and-down method.

RESULTS

Isotonic regression with a bootstrapping approach revealed that the estimated EC₅₀ of remifentanil for preventing coughing during emergence was significantly lower in females {1.30 ng/mL [83% confidence interval (CI), 1.20-1.47 ng/mL]} than in males [2.57 ng/mL (83% CI, 2.45-2.70 ng/mL)]. Mean EC₅₀ in females was also significantly lower than in males (1.23±0.21 ng/mL vs. 2.43±0.21 ng/mL, p<0.001). Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate over time were not significantly different between the sexes.

CONCLUSION

When using remifentanil TCI for cough prevention during anesthetic emergence, patient sex should be a considered for appropriate dosing.

Sex and gender aspects in anesthetics and pain medication

The influence of sex and gender on anesthesia and analgesic therapy remains poorly understood, nevertheless the numerous physiological and pharmacological differences present between men and women. Although in anesthesiology sex-gender aspects have attracted little attention, it has been reported that women have a greater sensitivity to the non-depolarizing neuroblocking agents, whereas males are more sensitive than females to propofol. It has been suggested that men wake slower than women after general anesthesia and have less postoperative nausea and vomiting. Sexual hormones seem to be of importance in the onset of differences. Nevertheless, in the last years, sex-gender influences on pain and analgesia have become a hot topic and data regarding sex-gender differences in response to pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic pain treatments are still scanty, inconsistent, and non-univocal. In particular, females seem to be more sensitive than males to opioid receptor agonists. Women may experience respiratory depression and other adverse effects more easily if they are given the same doses as males. Evidently, there is an obvious need for more research, which should include psychological and social factors in experimental preclinical and clinical paradigms in view of their importance on pain mechanism, in order to individualize analgesia to optimize pain relief.

Everyday regional anesthesia in children

Regional anesthesia in children is an evolving technique with many advantages in perioperative management. Although most regional anesthesia techniques are sufficiently described in the literature, the implementation of these techniques into daily clinical practice is still lacking. The main problems associated with pediatric regional anesthesia (PRA) include the appropriate selection of blockade, the management around the block, and how to teach these techniques in an optimal manner. This review article provides an overview of these 'hot' topics in PRA.

[Gender aspects in anesthesia : modified approach in research and treatment?]

Gender differences can have a relevant influence on the perioperative outcome as male and female patients are affected differently by adverse events, e.g. side effects of drugs. Furthermore, differences relating to specific drug effects, comorbidities and outcome after anesthesia or intensive care have been demonstrated. There seems to be a gender bias in diagnosis and therapy. While the knowledge regarding this field is still growing certain aspects have already been integrated into clinical practice: prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), target controlled infusion (TCI) model and male only policy with production of blood products. There is a need to study the influence of gender, age and race in order to optimize treatment towards a more individualized therapy. This article highlights already identified differences and discusses potential underlying mechanisms.

Minimum local analgesic concentration of ropivacaine for intra-operative caudal analgesia in pre-school and school age children

We compared the minimum local analgesia concentration of ropivacaine for intra-operative caudal analgesia in pre-school and school age children. Fifty-one boys, undergoing hypospadius repair surgery, were stratified into pre-school or school age groups. After induction of anaesthesia, caudal block was performed with ropivacaine 1 ml.kg⁻¹ of the desired concentration. The first child in each group received ropivacaine 0.125%, and subsequent concentrations were determined by the analgesic response of the previous patient using Dixon's up-and-down method. Under general anaesthesia with 0.7 minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane, the minimum local analgesia concentration of ropivacaine for intra-operative caudal block was 34% greater in school age than in pre-school age boys (0.143% (95% CI 0.132-0.157%) vs 0.107% (95% CI 0.089-0.122%), respectively; p < 0.001). This study indicates that a higher concentration of ropivacaine is needed for school age than pre-school age children to provide intra-operative caudal analgesia when combined with general anaesthesia.