Total Intravenous Anesthesia and Spontaneous Ventilation for Foreign Body Removal in Children

Nasal high-flow oxygen in pediatric anesthesia and airway management

Nasal High-Flow (NHF) is weight-dependent in children, aimed to match peak inspiratory flow and thereby deliver an accurate FiO₂ with a splinting pressure of 4-6 cm H₂ O. During apnea in children, NHF oxygen can double the expected time to desaturation below 90% in well children but there is no ventilatory exchange; therefore, children do not "THRIVE". Total intravenous anesthesia competency to maintain spontaneous breathing is an important adjunct for successful NHF oxygenation technique during anesthesia. Jaw thrust to maintain a patent upper airway is paramount until surgical instrumentation occurs. There is no evidence to support safe use of NHF oxygen with LASER use due to increased risk of airway fire.

Controlled ventilation or spontaneous respiration in anesthesia for tracheobronchial foreign body removal: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Either controlled ventilation or spontaneous respiration is commonly used in general anesthesia for inhaled foreign body removal via rigid bronchoscopy. Controversy in the literature exists concerning which form of ventilation is optimally suited for bronchoscopy. We performed a meta-analysis to compare controlled ventilation and spontaneous respiration with respect to complications, operation time, and anesthesia recovery time.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE (1946-2013) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE. The articles were evaluated for validity, and the data on complications, including desaturation, laryngospasm, laryngeal edema, bucking and coughing, body movement, breath holding, operation time, and anesthesia recovery time, were extracted by the authors and summarized using odds ratios, mean differences, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

From the included studies, 423 subjects received controlled ventilation, whereas 441 subjects received spontaneous respiration. There was no significant difference in the incidence of desaturation between controlled ventilation and spontaneous respiration (odds ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.30-1.63). However, the incidence of laryngospasm was lower when controlled ventilation was performed (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.10-0.76). The operation time (mean difference, -9.07 min; 95% CI, -14.03 to -4.12) was shorter in the controlled ventilation group.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence does not show a preference for either controlled ventilation or spontaneous respiration, although laryngospasm has a lower incidence when controlled ventilation is performed. Additional clinical studies are required to substantiate this issue.