Can transnasal flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy contribute to airway management decisions?

Principles of Subglottic and Tracheal Visualization with Transnasal Flexible Laryngoscopy

OBJECTIVE

The subglottic area and trachea are important parts of the upper airway, and can be visualized easily using transnasal flexible laryngoscopy (TFL). The aim of this study was to develop a clinical grading system to assist in documentation of the subglottic area and trachea with TFL, and to demonstrate the basic principles of visualization of these anatomic areas as a laryngology practice.

METHODS

The TFL videos of 100 randomized patients were evaluated by three laryngologists. The simple head extension (SHE) position and flexion position (FP) were applied to the patients during the visualization of the subglottic area and trachea. A paired t test was used to compare the grades of the subglottic and tracheal view according to the SHE and FP scores.

RESULTS

This study examined 50 male and 50 female patients ranging in age from 28 to 83 years (mean age: 50.09 ± 13.05 years). For the SHE and FP, the numbers of patients constituting grade 1 were 2 and 35, grade 2 were 2 and 37, grade 3 were 30 and 19, and grade 4 were 41 and 9, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between SHE and FP (P  <  0.05). The k score was 0.785 between the ratings of observer 1 and observer 2; 0.771 between observer 1 and observer 3; and 0.757 between observer 2 and observer 3 (P  <  0.001).

CONCLUSION

This new grading system for the visualization of the subglottis and trachea can help physicians assess and identify the upper airways, and FP provides a better subglottic and tracheal view than SHE.

Comparison of topical anesthetic effects of lidocaine, prilocaine, ropivacaine, and bupivacaine in transnasal fiberoptic nasopharyngolaryngoscopy

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to investigate the topical anesthetic efficacy of four different solutions including lidocaine spray, bupivacaine, ropivacaine, and prilocaine used in patients undergoing transnasal fiberoptic nasopharyngolaryngoscopic examination (TFL).

METHODS

The study included 200 patients who underwent anterior rhinoscopy and TFL examination as a part of routine otolaryngological evaluation in our outpatient clinics. Of these, 111 were female and 89 were male patients. The mean age of the patients was 32 ± 8 years (aged between 19 and 55 years). The patients were randomly divided into five groups. Five groups received one of the local anesthetics studied in our trial (10% lidocaine, 0.5% ropivacaine, 0.25% bupivacaine, 2% prilocaine, and saline solution) in each right side of the nose for 10 minutes before TFL. Each separate examination was performed on the right side of the nasal cavity. After the examination, the patients were asked to note the intensity of the pain that they have experienced during the TFL, by using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS).

RESULTS

The mean VAS scores were 2.08 (SD, 0.62) in the lidocaine group, 2.21 (SD, 0.66) in the prilocaine group, 3.92 (SD, 0.58) in the ropivacaine group, 4.15 (SD, 0.64) in the bupivacaine group, and 6.35 (SD, 0.65) in the saline solution group. The lidocaine and prilocaine groups had significantly better VAS scores versus ropivacaine, bupivacaine, and saline solution groups (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

To provide ideal examination comfort and optimum patient tolerability during TFL evaluation of upper respiratory airway topical lidocaine and prilocaine applications were found to be more efficacious and effective medication for anesthesia of the intranasal mucosa compared with bupivacaine and ropivacaine solutions.