1
|
Gao J, Li F. Heterochromatin repeat organization at an individual level: Rex1BD and the 14-3-3 protein coordinate to shape the epigenetic landscape within heterochromatin repeats. Bioessays 2024; 46:e2400030. [PMID: 38679759 DOI: 10.1002/bies.202400030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 04/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
In eukaryotic cells, heterochromatin is typically composed of tandem DNA repeats and plays crucial roles in gene expression and genome stability. It has been reported that silencing at individual units within tandem heterochromatin repeats exhibits a position-dependent variation. However, how the heterochromatin is organized at an individual repeat level remains poorly understood. Using a novel genetic approach, our recent study identified a conserved protein Rex1BD required for position-dependent silencing within heterochromatin repeats. We further revealed that Rex1BD interacts with the 14-3-3 protein to regulate heterochromatin silencing by linking RNAi and HDAC pathways. In this review, we discuss how Rex1BD and the 14-3-3 protein coordinate to modulate heterochromatin organization at the individual repeat level, and comment on the biological significance of the position-dependent effect in heterochromatin repeats. We also identify the knowledge gaps that still need to be unveiled in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinxin Gao
- Department of Biology, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Fei Li
- Department of Biology, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Balachandra V, Shrestha RL, Hammond CM, Lin S, Hendriks IA, Sethi SC, Chen L, Sevilla S, Caplen NJ, Chari R, Karpova TS, McKinnon K, Todd MA, Koparde V, Cheng KCC, Nielsen ML, Groth A, Basrai MA. DNAJC9 prevents CENP-A mislocalization and chromosomal instability by maintaining the fidelity of histone supply chains. EMBO J 2024; 43:2166-2197. [PMID: 38600242 PMCID: PMC11148058 DOI: 10.1038/s44318-024-00093-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
The centromeric histone H3 variant CENP-A is overexpressed in many cancers. The mislocalization of CENP-A to noncentromeric regions contributes to chromosomal instability (CIN), a hallmark of cancer. However, pathways that promote or prevent CENP-A mislocalization remain poorly defined. Here, we performed a genome-wide RNAi screen for regulators of CENP-A localization which identified DNAJC9, a J-domain protein implicated in histone H3-H4 protein folding, as a factor restricting CENP-A mislocalization. Cells lacking DNAJC9 exhibit mislocalization of CENP-A throughout the genome, and CIN phenotypes. Global interactome analysis showed that DNAJC9 depletion promotes the interaction of CENP-A with the DNA-replication-associated histone chaperone MCM2. CENP-A mislocalization upon DNAJC9 depletion was dependent on MCM2, defining MCM2 as a driver of CENP-A deposition at ectopic sites when H3-H4 supply chains are disrupted. Cells depleted for histone H3.3, also exhibit CENP-A mislocalization. In summary, we have defined novel factors that prevent mislocalization of CENP-A, and demonstrated that the integrity of H3-H4 supply chains regulated by histone chaperones such as DNAJC9 restrict CENP-A mislocalization and CIN.
Collapse
Grants
- 75N91019D00024 NCI NIH HHS
- HHSN261201500003I NCI NIH HHS
- ZIA BC 010822 HHS | NIH | NCI | Center for Cancer Research (CCR)
- ZIA BC 011704 HHS | NIH | NCI | Center for Cancer Research (CCR)
- 75N91019D00024 NCI NIH HHS
- HHSN261201500003I NCI NIH HHS
- 0135-00096B and 8020-00220B,EPIC-XS-823839,R146-A9159-16-S2 Independent Research Fund Denmark, European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program, Danish Cancer Society
- ERC CoG 724436,R198-2015-269 and R313-2019-448,7016-00042B,NNF21OC0067425,NNF14CC0001 European Research Council, Lund-beck Foundation, Independent Research Fund Denmark, Novo Nordisk Foundation
- HHS | NIH | National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Independent Research Fund Denmark, European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program, Danish Cancer Society
- NIH Intramural Research Program, Intramural Research Program of the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinutha Balachandra
- Yeast Genome Stability Section, Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Roshan L Shrestha
- Yeast Genome Stability Section, Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Colin M Hammond
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research (CPR), Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Biotech Research and Innovation Centre (BRIC), Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
| | - Shinjen Lin
- Functional Genomics Laboratory, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ivo A Hendriks
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research (CPR), Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Subhash Chandra Sethi
- Yeast Genome Stability Section, Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lu Chen
- Functional Genomics Laboratory, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Samantha Sevilla
- Collaborative Bioinformatics Resource, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Advanced Biomedical Computational Science, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA
| | - Natasha J Caplen
- Functional Genetics Section, Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Raj Chari
- Genome Modification Core (GMC), Frederick National Lab for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA
| | - Tatiana S Karpova
- Optical Microscopy Core, Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Katherine McKinnon
- Flow Cytometry Core, Vaccine Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Matthew Am Todd
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research (CPR), Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Biotech Research and Innovation Centre (BRIC), Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vishal Koparde
- Collaborative Bioinformatics Resource, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Advanced Biomedical Computational Science, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA
| | - Ken Chih-Chien Cheng
- Functional Genomics Laboratory, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Michael L Nielsen
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research (CPR), Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anja Groth
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research (CPR), Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Biotech Research and Innovation Centre (BRIC), Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Munira A Basrai
- Yeast Genome Stability Section, Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Parl FF. Analysis of CENP-B Boxes as Anchor of Kinetochores in Centromeres of Human Chromosomes. Bioinform Biol Insights 2024; 18:11779322241248913. [PMID: 38690324 PMCID: PMC11060027 DOI: 10.1177/11779322241248913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
The kinetochore is a multiprotein structure that attaches at one end to DNA in the centromere and at the other end to microtubules in the mitotic spindle. By connecting centromere and spindle, the kinetochore controls the migration of chromosomes during cell division. The exact position where the kinetochore assembles on each centromere was uncertain because large sections of centromeric DNA had not been sequenced due to highly repetitive alpha-satellite arrays. Embedded in the arrays is a 17 bp consensus sequence, the so-called CENP-B box, which binds the CENP-B protein, the only protein that binds directly to centromeric DNA. Recently, the Telomere-to-Telomere Consortium published the complete centromeric DNA sequences of all chromosomes including their epigenetic modifications in the T2T-CHM13 map. I used data from the T2T-CHM13 map to locate the CENP-B boxes in the centromeres as anchor of kinetochores. Most of the CENP-B boxes in centromeric DNA are methylated with the exception of the so-called centromere dip region (CDR), where CENP-B protein dimers bind to adjacent unmethylated CENP-B boxes and interact with CENP-A and CENP-C proteins to assemble the kinetochore. The centromeres of all chromosomes combined have a size of 407 Mb of which the kinetochores account for 5.0 Mb or 1.2%. There is no correlation between centromere and kinetochore size (P = .77). While the number of CENP-B boxes varies 4-fold between chromosomes, their density (number/Kb) varies less than 2-fold with a mean of 2.61 ± 0.33. The narrow range ensures a uniform pull of the spindle on the centromeres. I illustrate the findings in a model of the human kinetochore anchored at unmethylated CENP-B boxes in the CDR and present circos plots of chromosomes to show the location of kinetochores in their respective centromeres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fritz F Parl
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Di Tommaso E, Giunta S. Dynamic interplay between human alpha-satellite DNA structure and centromere functions. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2024; 156:130-140. [PMID: 37926668 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2023.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
Maintenance of genome stability relies on functional centromeres for correct chromosome segregation and faithful inheritance of the genetic information. The human centromere is the primary constriction within mitotic chromosomes made up of repetitive alpha-satellite DNA hierarchically organized in megabase-long arrays of near-identical higher order repeats (HORs). Centromeres are epigenetically specified by the presence of the centromere-specific histone H3 variant, CENP-A, which enables the assembly of the kinetochore for microtubule attachment. Notably, centromeric DNA is faithfully inherited as intact haplotypes from the parents to the offspring without intervening recombination, yet, outside of meiosis, centromeres are akin to common fragile sites (CFSs), manifesting crossing-overs and ongoing sequence instability. Consequences of DNA changes within the centromere are just starting to emerge, with unclear effects on intra- and inter-generational inheritance driven by centromere's essential role in kinetochore assembly. Here, we review evidence of meiotic selection operating to mitigate centromere drive, as well as recent reports on centromere damage, recombination and repair during the mitotic cell division. We propose an antagonistic pleiotropy interpretation to reconcile centromere DNA instability as both driver of aneuploidy that underlies degenerative diseases, while also potentially necessary for the maintenance of homogenized HORs for centromere function. We attempt to provide a framework for this conceptual leap taking into consideration the structural interface of centromere-kinetochore interaction and present case scenarios for its malfunctioning. Finally, we offer an integrated working model to connect DNA instability, chromatin, and structural changes with functional consequences on chromosome integrity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Di Tommaso
- Laboratory of Genome Evolution, Department of Biology & Biotechnology Charles Darwin, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome 00185, Italy
| | - Simona Giunta
- Laboratory of Genome Evolution, Department of Biology & Biotechnology Charles Darwin, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome 00185, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Serafim RB, Cardoso C, Storti CB, da Silva P, Qi H, Parasuram R, Navegante G, Peron JPS, Silva WA, Espreafico EM, Paçó-Larson ML, Price BD, Valente V. HJURP is recruited to double-strand break sites and facilitates DNA repair by promoting chromatin reorganization. Oncogene 2024; 43:804-820. [PMID: 38279062 DOI: 10.1038/s41388-024-02937-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
HJURP is overexpressed in several cancer types and strongly correlates with patient survival. However, the mechanistic basis underlying the association of HJURP with cancer aggressiveness is not well understood. HJURP promotes the loading of the histone H3 variant, CENP-A, at the centromeric chromatin, epigenetically defining the centromeres and supporting proper chromosome segregation. In addition, HJURP is associated with DNA repair but its function in this process is still scarcely explored. Here, we demonstrate that HJURP is recruited to DSBs through a mechanism requiring chromatin PARylation and promotes epigenetic alterations that favor the execution of DNA repair. Incorporation of HJURP at DSBs promotes turnover of H3K9me3 and HP1, facilitating DNA damage signaling and DSB repair. Moreover, HJURP overexpression in glioma cell lines also affected global structure of heterochromatin independently of DNA damage induction, promoting genome-wide reorganization and assisting DNA damage response. HJURP overexpression therefore extensively alters DNA damage signaling and DSB repair, and also increases radioresistance of glioma cells. Importantly, HJURP expression levels in tumors are also associated with poor response of patients to radiation. Thus, our results enlarge the understanding of HJURP involvement in DNA repair and highlight it as a promising target for the development of adjuvant therapies that sensitize tumor cells to irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodolfo B Serafim
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (USP), Avenida Bandeirantes, 3900, Ribeirão Preto, 14049-900, Brazil
- São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Rodovia Araraquara - Jaú, Km 01 - s/n, Campos Ville, Araraquara, SP, 14800-903, Brazil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- Center for Cell-Based Therapy-CEPID/FAPESP, Rua Tenente Catão Roxo, 2501, Ribeirão Preto, 14051-140, Brazil
| | - Cibele Cardoso
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (USP), Avenida Bandeirantes, 3900, Ribeirão Preto, 14049-900, Brazil
- Center for Cell-Based Therapy-CEPID/FAPESP, Rua Tenente Catão Roxo, 2501, Ribeirão Preto, 14051-140, Brazil
- Department of Genetics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (USP), Avenida Bandeirantes, 3900, Ribeirão Preto, 14049-900, Brazil
| | - Camila B Storti
- Department of Genetics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (USP), Avenida Bandeirantes, 3900, Ribeirão Preto, 14049-900, Brazil
| | - Patrick da Silva
- Department of Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Hongyun Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Ramya Parasuram
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Geovana Navegante
- São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Rodovia Araraquara - Jaú, Km 01 - s/n, Campos Ville, Araraquara, SP, 14800-903, Brazil
| | - Jean Pierre S Peron
- Department of Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Wilson A Silva
- Center for Cell-Based Therapy-CEPID/FAPESP, Rua Tenente Catão Roxo, 2501, Ribeirão Preto, 14051-140, Brazil
- Department of Genetics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (USP), Avenida Bandeirantes, 3900, Ribeirão Preto, 14049-900, Brazil
| | - Enilza M Espreafico
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (USP), Avenida Bandeirantes, 3900, Ribeirão Preto, 14049-900, Brazil
| | - Maria L Paçó-Larson
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (USP), Avenida Bandeirantes, 3900, Ribeirão Preto, 14049-900, Brazil
| | - Brendan D Price
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| | - Valeria Valente
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (USP), Avenida Bandeirantes, 3900, Ribeirão Preto, 14049-900, Brazil.
- São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Rodovia Araraquara - Jaú, Km 01 - s/n, Campos Ville, Araraquara, SP, 14800-903, Brazil.
- Center for Cell-Based Therapy-CEPID/FAPESP, Rua Tenente Catão Roxo, 2501, Ribeirão Preto, 14051-140, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sissoko GB, Tarasovetc EV, Marescal O, Grishchuk EL, Cheeseman IM. Higher-order protein assembly controls kinetochore formation. Nat Cell Biol 2024; 26:45-56. [PMID: 38168769 PMCID: PMC10842828 DOI: 10.1038/s41556-023-01313-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
To faithfully segregate chromosomes during vertebrate mitosis, kinetochore-microtubule interactions must be restricted to a single site on each chromosome. Prior work on pair-wise kinetochore protein interactions has been unable to identify the mechanisms that prevent outer kinetochore formation in regions with a low density of CENP-A nucleosomes. To investigate the impact of higher-order assembly on kinetochore formation, we generated oligomers of the inner kinetochore protein CENP-T using two distinct, genetically engineered systems in human cells. Although individual CENP-T molecules interact poorly with outer kinetochore proteins, oligomers that mimic centromeric CENP-T density trigger the robust formation of functional, cytoplasmic kinetochore-like particles. Both in cells and in vitro, each molecule of oligomerized CENP-T recruits substantially higher levels of outer kinetochore components than monomeric CENP-T molecules. Our work suggests that the density dependence of CENP-T restricts outer kinetochore recruitment to centromeres, where densely packed CENP-A recruits a high local concentration of inner kinetochore proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gunter B Sissoko
- Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Ekaterina V Tarasovetc
- Department of Physiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Océane Marescal
- Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Ekaterina L Grishchuk
- Department of Physiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Iain M Cheeseman
- Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.
- Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Brannan EO, Hartley GA, O’Neill RJ. Mechanisms of Rapid Karyotype Evolution in Mammals. Genes (Basel) 2023; 15:62. [PMID: 38254952 PMCID: PMC10815390 DOI: 10.3390/genes15010062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Chromosome reshuffling events are often a foundational mechanism by which speciation can occur, giving rise to highly derivative karyotypes even amongst closely related species. Yet, the features that distinguish lineages prone to such rapid chromosome evolution from those that maintain stable karyotypes across evolutionary time are still to be defined. In this review, we summarize lineages prone to rapid karyotypic evolution in the context of Simpson's rates of evolution-tachytelic, horotelic, and bradytelic-and outline the mechanisms proposed to contribute to chromosome rearrangements, their fixation, and their potential impact on speciation events. Furthermore, we discuss relevant genomic features that underpin chromosome variation, including patterns of fusions/fissions, centromere positioning, and epigenetic marks such as DNA methylation. Finally, in the era of telomere-to-telomere genomics, we discuss the value of gapless genome resources to the future of research focused on the plasticity of highly rearranged karyotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emry O. Brannan
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA; (E.O.B.); (G.A.H.)
| | - Gabrielle A. Hartley
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA; (E.O.B.); (G.A.H.)
| | - Rachel J. O’Neill
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA; (E.O.B.); (G.A.H.)
- Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ólafsson G, Haase MAB, Boeke JD. Humanization reveals pervasive incompatibility of yeast and human kinetochore components. G3 (BETHESDA, MD.) 2023; 14:jkad260. [PMID: 37962556 PMCID: PMC10755175 DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkad260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
Kinetochores assemble on centromeres to drive chromosome segregation in eukaryotic cells. Humans and budding yeast share most of the structural subunits of the kinetochore, whereas protein sequences have diverged considerably. The conserved centromeric histone H3 variant, CenH3 (CENP-A in humans and Cse4 in budding yeast), marks the site for kinetochore assembly in most species. A previous effort to complement Cse4 in yeast with human CENP-A was unsuccessful; however, co-complementation with the human core nucleosome was not attempted. Previously, our lab successfully humanized the core nucleosome in yeast; however, this severely affected cellular growth. We hypothesized that yeast Cse4 is incompatible with humanized nucleosomes and that the kinetochore represented a limiting factor for efficient histone humanization. Thus, we argued that including the human CENP-A or a Cse4-CENP-A chimera might improve histone humanization and facilitate kinetochore function in humanized yeast. The opposite was true: CENP-A expression reduced histone humanization efficiency, was toxic to yeast, and disrupted cell cycle progression and kinetochore function in wild-type (WT) cells. Suppressors of CENP-A toxicity included gene deletions of subunits of 3 conserved chromatin remodeling complexes, highlighting their role in CenH3 chromatin positioning. Finally, we attempted to complement the subunits of the NDC80 kinetochore complex, individually and in combination, without success, in contrast to a previous study indicating complementation by the human NDC80/HEC1 gene. Our results suggest that limited protein sequence similarity between yeast and human components in this very complex structure leads to failure of complementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guðjón Ólafsson
- Institute for Systems Genetics and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Max A B Haase
- Institute for Systems Genetics and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, USA
- Vilcek Institute of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Jef D Boeke
- Institute for Systems Genetics and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, NYU Tandon School of Engineering, Brooklyn, NY 14 11201, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sundararajan K, Straight AF. Centromere Identity and the Regulation of Chromosome Segregation. Front Cell Dev Biol 2022; 10:914249. [PMID: 35721504 PMCID: PMC9203049 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.914249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Eukaryotes segregate their chromosomes during mitosis and meiosis by attaching chromosomes to the microtubules of the spindle so that they can be distributed into daughter cells. The complexity of centromeres ranges from the point centromeres of yeast that attach to a single microtubule to the more complex regional centromeres found in many metazoans or holocentric centromeres of some nematodes, arthropods and plants, that bind to dozens of microtubules per kinetochore. In vertebrates, the centromere is defined by a centromere specific histone variant termed Centromere Protein A (CENP-A) that replaces histone H3 in a subset of centromeric nucleosomes. These CENP-A nucleosomes are distributed on long stretches of highly repetitive DNA and interspersed with histone H3 containing nucleosomes. The mechanisms by which cells control the number and position of CENP-A nucleosomes is unknown but likely important for the organization of centromeric chromatin in mitosis so that the kinetochore is properly oriented for microtubule capture. CENP-A chromatin is epigenetically determined thus cells must correct errors in CENP-A organization to prevent centromere dysfunction and chromosome loss. Recent improvements in sequencing complex centromeres have paved the way for defining the organization of CENP-A nucleosomes in centromeres. Here we discuss the importance and challenges in understanding CENP-A organization and highlight new discoveries and advances enabled by recent improvements in the human genome assembly.
Collapse
|
10
|
Renaud-Pageot C, Quivy JP, Lochhead M, Almouzni G. CENP-A Regulation and Cancer. Front Cell Dev Biol 2022; 10:907120. [PMID: 35721491 PMCID: PMC9201071 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.907120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In mammals, CENP-A, a histone H3 variant found in the centromeric chromatin, is critical for faithful chromosome segregation and genome integrity maintenance through cell divisions. Specifically, it has dual functions, enabling to define epigenetically the centromere position and providing the foundation for building up the kinetochore. Regulation of its dynamics of synthesis and deposition ensures to propagate proper centromeres on each chromosome across mitosis and meiosis. However, CENP-A overexpression is a feature identified in many cancers. Importantly, high levels of CENP-A lead to its mislocalization outside the centromere. Recent studies in mammals have begun to uncover how CENP-A overexpression can affect genome integrity, reprogram cell fate and impact 3D nuclear organization in cancer. Here, we summarize the mechanisms that orchestrate CENP-A regulation. Then we review how, beyond its centromeric function, CENP-A overexpression is linked to cancer state in mammalian cells, with a focus on the perturbations that ensue at the level of chromatin organization. Finally, we review the clinical interest for CENP-A in cancer treatment.
Collapse
|
11
|
The ins and outs of CENP-A: Chromatin dynamics of the centromere-specific histone. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2022; 135:24-34. [PMID: 35422390 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2022.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Centromeres are highly specialised chromosome domains defined by the presence of an epigenetic mark, the specific histone H3 variant called CENP-A (centromere protein A). They constitute the genomic regions on which kinetochores form and when defective cause segregation defects that can lead to aneuploidy and cancer. Here, we discuss how CENP-A is established and maintained to propagate centromere identity while subjected to dynamic chromatin remodelling during essential cellular processes like DNA repair, replication, and transcription. We highlight parallels and identify conserved mechanisms between different model organism with a particular focus on 1) the establishment of CENP-A at centromeres, 2) CENP-A maintenance during transcription and replication, and 3) the mechanisms that help preventing CENP-A localization at non-centromeric sites. We then give examples of how timely loading of new CENP-A to the centromere, maintenance of old CENP-A during S-phase and transcription, and removal of CENP-A at non-centromeric sites are coordinated and controlled by an intricate network of factors whose identity is slowly being unravelled.
Collapse
|
12
|
Molecular Dynamics and Evolution of Centromeres in the Genus Equus. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23084183. [PMID: 35457002 PMCID: PMC9024551 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23084183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The centromere is the chromosomal locus essential for proper chromosome segregation. While the centromeric function is well conserved and epigenetically specified, centromeric DNA sequences are typically composed of satellite DNA and represent the most rapidly evolving sequences in eukaryotic genomes. The presence of satellite sequences at centromeres hampered the comprehensive molecular analysis of these enigmatic loci. The discovery of functional centromeres completely devoid of satellite repetitions and fixed in some animal and plant species represented a turning point in centromere biology, definitively proving the epigenetic nature of the centromere. The first satellite-free centromere, fixed in a vertebrate species, was discovered in the horse. Later, an extraordinary number of satellite-free neocentromeres had been discovered in other species of the genus Equus, which remains the only mammalian genus with numerous satellite-free centromeres described thus far. These neocentromeres arose recently during evolution and are caught in a stage of incomplete maturation. Their presence made the equids a unique model for investigating, at molecular level, the minimal requirements for centromere seeding and evolution. This model system provided new insights on how centromeres are established and transmitted to the progeny and on the role of satellite DNA in different aspects of centromere biology.
Collapse
|
13
|
Gershman A, Sauria MEG, Guitart X, Vollger MR, Hook PW, Hoyt SJ, Jain M, Shumate A, Razaghi R, Koren S, Altemose N, Caldas GV, Logsdon GA, Rhie A, Eichler EE, Schatz MC, O'Neill RJ, Phillippy AM, Miga KH, Timp W. Epigenetic patterns in a complete human genome. Science 2022; 376:eabj5089. [PMID: 35357915 PMCID: PMC9170183 DOI: 10.1126/science.abj5089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 58.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The completion of a telomere-to-telomere human reference genome, T2T-CHM13, has resolved complex regions of the genome, including repetitive and homologous regions. Here, we present a high-resolution epigenetic study of previously unresolved sequences, representing entire acrocentric chromosome short arms, gene family expansions, and a diverse collection of repeat classes. This resource precisely maps CpG methylation (32.28 million CpGs), DNA accessibility, and short-read datasets (166,058 previously unresolved chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing peaks) to provide evidence of activity across previously unidentified or corrected genes and reveals clinically relevant paralog-specific regulation. Probing CpG methylation across human centromeres from six diverse individuals generated an estimate of variability in kinetochore localization. This analysis provides a framework with which to investigate the most elusive regions of the human genome, granting insights into epigenetic regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariel Gershman
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael E G Sauria
- Department of Biology and Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Xavi Guitart
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Mitchell R Vollger
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Paul W Hook
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Savannah J Hoyt
- Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Miten Jain
- UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Alaina Shumate
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Roham Razaghi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sergey Koren
- Genome Informatics Section, Computational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Nicolas Altemose
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Gina V Caldas
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley CA, USA
| | - Glennis A Logsdon
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Arang Rhie
- Genome Informatics Section, Computational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Evan E Eichler
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Michael C Schatz
- Department of Biology and Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Rachel J O'Neill
- Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Adam M Phillippy
- Genome Informatics Section, Computational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Karen H Miga
- UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Winston Timp
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Altemose N, Glennis A, Bzikadze AV, Sidhwani P, Langley SA, Caldas GV, Hoyt SJ, Uralsky L, Ryabov FD, Shew CJ, Sauria MEG, Borchers M, Gershman A, Mikheenko A, Shepelev VA, Dvorkina T, Kunyavskaya O, Vollger MR, Rhie A, McCartney AM, Asri M, Lorig-Roach R, Shafin K, Aganezov S, Olson D, de Lima LG, Potapova T, Hartley GA, Haukness M, Kerpedjiev P, Gusev F, Tigyi K, Brooks S, Young A, Nurk S, Koren S, Salama SR, Paten B, Rogaev EI, Streets A, Karpen GH, Dernburg AF, Sullivan BA, Straight AF, Wheeler TJ, Gerton JL, Eichler EE, Phillippy AM, Timp W, Dennis MY, O'Neill RJ, Zook JM, Schatz MC, Pevzner PA, Diekhans M, Langley CH, Alexandrov IA, Miga KH. Complete genomic and epigenetic maps of human centromeres. Science 2022; 376:eabl4178. [PMID: 35357911 PMCID: PMC9233505 DOI: 10.1126/science.abl4178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 193] [Impact Index Per Article: 96.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Existing human genome assemblies have almost entirely excluded repetitive sequences within and near centromeres, limiting our understanding of their organization, evolution, and functions, which include facilitating proper chromosome segregation. Now, a complete, telomere-to-telomere human genome assembly (T2T-CHM13) has enabled us to comprehensively characterize pericentromeric and centromeric repeats, which constitute 6.2% of the genome (189.9 megabases). Detailed maps of these regions revealed multimegabase structural rearrangements, including in active centromeric repeat arrays. Analysis of centromere-associated sequences uncovered a strong relationship between the position of the centromere and the evolution of the surrounding DNA through layered repeat expansions. Furthermore, comparisons of chromosome X centromeres across a diverse panel of individuals illuminated high degrees of structural, epigenetic, and sequence variation in these complex and rapidly evolving regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Altemose
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - A. Glennis
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Andrey V. Bzikadze
- Graduate Program in Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Pragya Sidhwani
- Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Sasha A. Langley
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Gina V. Caldas
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Savannah J. Hoyt
- Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Lev Uralsky
- Sirius University of Science and Technology, Sochi, Russia
- Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Colin J. Shew
- Genome Center, MIND Institute, and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Ariel Gershman
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alla Mikheenko
- Center for Algorithmic Biotechnology, Institute of Translational Biomedicine, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | | | - Tatiana Dvorkina
- Center for Algorithmic Biotechnology, Institute of Translational Biomedicine, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - Olga Kunyavskaya
- Center for Algorithmic Biotechnology, Institute of Translational Biomedicine, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - Mitchell R. Vollger
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Arang Rhie
- Genome Informatics Section, Computational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ann M. McCartney
- Genome Informatics Section, Computational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Mobin Asri
- UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Ryan Lorig-Roach
- UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Kishwar Shafin
- UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Sergey Aganezov
- Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniel Olson
- Department of Computer Science, University of Montana, Missoula, MT. USA
| | | | - Tamara Potapova
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Gabrielle A. Hartley
- Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Marina Haukness
- UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | | | - Fedor Gusev
- Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Moscow, Russia
| | - Kristof Tigyi
- UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD, USA
| | - Shelise Brooks
- NIH Intramural Sequencing Center, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Alice Young
- NIH Intramural Sequencing Center, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sergey Nurk
- Genome Informatics Section, Computational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sergey Koren
- Genome Informatics Section, Computational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sofie R. Salama
- UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD, USA
| | - Benedict Paten
- UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
- Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Evgeny I. Rogaev
- Sirius University of Science and Technology, Sochi, Russia
- Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
- Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Aaron Streets
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
- Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Gary H. Karpen
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
- BioEngineering and BioMedical Sciences Department, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Abby F. Dernburg
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD, USA
- Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Beth A. Sullivan
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Travis J. Wheeler
- Department of Computer Science, University of Montana, Missoula, MT. USA
| | - Jennifer L. Gerton
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO, USA
- University of Kansas Medical School, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Cancer Center, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Evan E. Eichler
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD, USA
| | - Adam M. Phillippy
- Genome Informatics Section, Computational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Winston Timp
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Megan Y. Dennis
- Genome Center, MIND Institute, and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Rachel J. O'Neill
- Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Justin M. Zook
- Biosystems and Biomaterials Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| | - Michael C. Schatz
- Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Pavel A. Pevzner
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Mark Diekhans
- UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Charles H. Langley
- Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Ivan A. Alexandrov
- Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Moscow, Russia
- Center for Algorithmic Biotechnology, Institute of Translational Biomedicine, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
- Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Karen H. Miga
- UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
- Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Jeffery D, Lochhead M, Almouzni G. CENP-A: A Histone H3 Variant with Key Roles in Centromere Architecture in Healthy and Diseased States. Results Probl Cell Differ 2022; 70:221-261. [PMID: 36348109 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Centromeres are key architectural components of chromosomes. Here, we examine their construction, maintenance, and functionality. Focusing on the mammalian centromere- specific histone H3 variant, CENP-A, we highlight its coevolution with both centromeric DNA and its chaperone, HJURP. We then consider CENP-A de novo deposition and the importance of centromeric DNA recently uncovered with the added value from new ultra-long-read sequencing. We next review how to ensure the maintenance of CENP-A at the centromere throughout the cell cycle. Finally, we discuss the impact of disrupting CENP-A regulation on cancer and cell fate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Jeffery
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue contre le Cancer, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Nuclear Dynamics Unit, UMR3664, Paris, France
| | - Marina Lochhead
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue contre le Cancer, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Nuclear Dynamics Unit, UMR3664, Paris, France
| | - Geneviève Almouzni
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue contre le Cancer, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Nuclear Dynamics Unit, UMR3664, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kim T. Epigenetic control of centromere: what can we learn from neocentromere? Genes Genomics 2021; 44:317-325. [PMID: 34843088 DOI: 10.1007/s13258-021-01193-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The centromere is the special region on a chromosome, which serves as the site for assembly of kinetochore complex and is essential for maintaining genomic integrity. Neocentromeres are new centromeres that form on the non-centromeric regions of the chromosome when the natural centromere is disrupted or inactivated. Although neocentromeres lack the typical features found in centromeres, cells with neocentromeres divide normally during mitosis and meiosis. Neocentromeres not only arise naturally but their formation can also be induced experimentally. Therefore, neocentromeres are a great tool for studying functions and formation of centromeres. OBJECTIVE To study neocentromeres and use that knowledge to gain insights into the epigenetic regulation of canonical centromeres. DISCUSSION Here, we review the characteristics of naturally occurring centromeres and neocentromeres and those of experimentally induced neocentromeres. We also discuss the mechanism of centromere formation and epigenetic regulation of centromere function, which we learned from studying the neocentromeres. Although neocentromeres lack main features of centromeres, such as presence of repetitive ⍺-satellite DNA and pericentric heterochromatin, they behave quite similar to the canonical centromere, indicating the epigenetic nature of the centromere. Still, further investigation will help to understand the formation and maintenance of the centromere, and the correlation to human diseases. CONCLUSION Neocentromeres helped us to understand the formation of canonical centromeres. Also, since neocentromeres are associated with certain cancer types, knowledge about them could be helpful to treat cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taekyung Kim
- Department of Biology Education, Pusan National University, 2, Busandaehak-ro 63beon-gil, Geumjeong-gu, Busan, 46241, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wang K, Liu Y, Yu Z, Gu B, Hu J, Huang L, Ge X, Xu L, Zhang M, Zhao J, Hu M, Le R, Wu Q, Ye S, Gao S, Zhang X, Xu RM, Li G. Phosphorylation at Ser68 facilitates DCAF11-mediated ubiquitination and degradation of CENP-A during the cell cycle. Cell Rep 2021; 37:109987. [PMID: 34758320 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Revised: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
CENP-A (centromeric protein A), a histone H3 variant, specifies centromere identity and is essential to centromere maintenance. Little is known about how protein levels of CENP-A are controlled in mammalian cells. Here, we report that the phosphorylation of CENP-A Ser68 primes the ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated proteolysis of CENP-A during mitotic phase in human cultured cells. We identify two major polyubiquitination sites that are responsible for this phosphorylation-dependent degradation. Substituting the two residues, Lys49 and Lys124, with arginines abrogates proper CENP-A degradation and results in CENP-A mislocalization to non-centromeric regions. Furthermore, we find that DCAF11 (DDB1 and CUL4 associated factor 11/WDR23) is the E3 ligase that specifically mediates the observed polyubiquitination. Deletion of DCAF11 hampers CENP-A degradation and causes its mislocalization. We conclude that the Ser68 phosphorylation plays an important role in regulating cellular CENP-A homeostasis via DCAF11-mediated degradation to prevent ectopic localization of CENP-A during the cell cycle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kehui Wang
- National Laboratory of Bio-macromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Yuting Liu
- National Laboratory of Bio-macromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Zhouliang Yu
- National Laboratory of Bio-macromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Bo Gu
- College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
| | - Jie Hu
- National Laboratory of Bio-macromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Li Huang
- National Laboratory of Bio-macromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Xiao Ge
- Center for Comparative Biomedicine, Key Laboratory of Systems Biomedicine (Ministry of Education), Institute of Systems Biomedicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
| | - Lingyi Xu
- Department of Biophysics, Department of Pathology of Sir Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310058, China; Department of Biophysics, Institute of Neuroscience, NHC and CAMS Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310058, China
| | - Mengyu Zhang
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Function and Application of Biological Macromolecular Structures, School of Life Sciences, Tianjin University, 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300072, China
| | - Jicheng Zhao
- National Laboratory of Bio-macromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Mingli Hu
- National Laboratory of Bio-macromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Rongrong Le
- School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
| | - Qiang Wu
- Center for Comparative Biomedicine, Key Laboratory of Systems Biomedicine (Ministry of Education), Institute of Systems Biomedicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
| | - Sheng Ye
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Function and Application of Biological Macromolecular Structures, School of Life Sciences, Tianjin University, 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300072, China; Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
| | - Shaorong Gao
- School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
| | - Xiaodong Zhang
- College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
| | - Rui-Ming Xu
- National Laboratory of Bio-macromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Guohong Li
- National Laboratory of Bio-macromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dong Q, Yang J, Gao J, Li F. Recent insights into mechanisms preventing ectopic centromere formation. Open Biol 2021; 11:210189. [PMID: 34493071 PMCID: PMC8424319 DOI: 10.1098/rsob.210189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The centromere is a specialized chromosomal structure essential for chromosome segregation. Centromere dysfunction leads to chromosome segregation errors and genome instability. In most eukaryotes, centromere identity is specified epigenetically by CENP-A, a centromere-specific histone H3 variant. CENP-A replaces histone H3 in centromeres, and nucleates the assembly of the kinetochore complex. Mislocalization of CENP-A to non-centromeric regions causes ectopic assembly of CENP-A chromatin, which has a devastating impact on chromosome segregation and has been linked to a variety of human cancers. How non-centromeric regions are protected from CENP-A misincorporation in normal cells is largely unexplored. Here, we review the most recent advances on the mechanisms underlying the prevention of ectopic centromere formation, and discuss the implications in human disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qianhua Dong
- Department of Biology, New York University, New York, NY 10003-6688, USA
| | - Jinpu Yang
- Department of Biology, New York University, New York, NY 10003-6688, USA
| | - Jinxin Gao
- Department of Biology, New York University, New York, NY 10003-6688, USA
| | - Fei Li
- Department of Biology, New York University, New York, NY 10003-6688, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Liu X, Wang H, Zhao G. Centromere Protein A Goes Far Beyond the Centromere in Cancers. Mol Cancer Res 2021; 20:3-10. [PMID: 34465586 DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-21-0311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Centromere dysfunctions leading to numerical chromosome alterations are believed to be closely related to human cancers. As a centromere-specific protein, centromere protein A (CENP-A) replaces the histone H3 in centromeres and is therefore considered a key factor of centromere identity. Researches have shown that CENP-A is overexpressed in many types of human cancers. However, the behavior and function of CENP-A in tumorigenesis have not yet been systematically summarized. In this article, we describe the pleiotropic roles of CENP-A in human cells. Moreover, we provide a comprehensive review of the current knowledge on the relationship between aberrant expression and ectopic localization of CENP-A and tumorigenesis, and the mechanism of the ectopic deposition of CENP-A in cancers. Furthermore, we note that some oncogenic viruses can modulate the expression and localization of this centromere protein along with its chaperone. At last, we also discuss the therapeutic potential of targeting CENP-A for cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaolan Liu
- Affiliated Wuhan Mental Health Center, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China. .,Research Center for Psychological and Health Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Haiping Wang
- School of Medicine, Jianghan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Guojun Zhao
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pajpach F, Wu T, Shearwin-Whyatt L, Jones K, Grützner F. Flavors of Non-Random Meiotic Segregation of Autosomes and Sex Chromosomes. Genes (Basel) 2021; 12:genes12091338. [PMID: 34573322 PMCID: PMC8471020 DOI: 10.3390/genes12091338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Segregation of chromosomes is a multistep process occurring both at mitosis and meiosis to ensure that daughter cells receive a complete set of genetic information. Critical components in the chromosome segregation include centromeres, kinetochores, components of sister chromatid and homologous chromosomes cohesion, microtubule organizing centres, and spindles. Based on the cytological work in the grasshopper Brachystola, it has been accepted for decades that segregation of homologs at meiosis is fundamentally random. This ensures that alleles on chromosomes have equal chance to be transmitted to progeny. At the same time mechanisms of meiotic drive and an increasing number of other examples of non-random segregation of autosomes and sex chromosomes provide insights into the underlying mechanisms of chromosome segregation but also question the textbook dogma of random chromosome segregation. Recent advances provide a better understanding of meiotic drive as a prominent force where cellular and chromosomal changes allow autosomes to bias their segregation. Less understood are mechanisms explaining observations that autosomal heteromorphism may cause biased segregation and regulate alternating segregation of multiple sex chromosome systems or translocation heterozygotes as an extreme case of non-random segregation. We speculate that molecular and cytological mechanisms of non-random segregation might be common in these cases and that there might be a continuous transition between random and non-random segregation which may play a role in the evolution of sexually antagonistic genes and sex chromosome evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filip Pajpach
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; (F.P.); (L.S.-W.)
| | - Tianyu Wu
- Department of Central Laboratory, Clinical Laboratory, Jing’an District Centre Hospital of Shanghai and Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China;
| | - Linda Shearwin-Whyatt
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; (F.P.); (L.S.-W.)
| | - Keith Jones
- Genome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RH, UK;
| | - Frank Grützner
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; (F.P.); (L.S.-W.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Böhm M, Killinger K, Dudziak A, Pant P, Jänen K, Hohoff S, Mechtler K, Örd M, Loog M, Sanchez-Garcia E, Westermann S. Cdc4 phospho-degrons allow differential regulation of Ame1 CENP-U protein stability across the cell cycle. eLife 2021; 10:67390. [PMID: 34308839 PMCID: PMC8341979 DOI: 10.7554/elife.67390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Kinetochores are multi-subunit protein assemblies that link chromosomes to microtubules of the mitotic and meiotic spindle. It is still poorly understood how efficient, centromere-dependent kinetochore assembly is accomplished from hundreds of individual protein building blocks in a cell cycle-dependent manner. Here, by combining comprehensive phosphorylation analysis of native Ctf19CCAN subunits with biochemical and functional assays in the model system budding yeast, we demonstrate that Cdk1 phosphorylation activates phospho-degrons on the essential subunit Ame1CENP-U, which are recognized by the E3 ubiquitin ligase complex SCF-Cdc4. Gradual phosphorylation of degron motifs culminates in M-phase and targets the protein for degradation. Binding of the Mtw1Mis12 complex shields the proximal phospho-degron, protecting kinetochore-bound Ame1 from the degradation machinery. Artificially increasing degron strength partially suppresses the temperature sensitivity of a cdc4 mutant, while overexpression of Ame1-Okp1 is toxic in SCF mutants, demonstrating the physiological importance of this mechanism. We propose that phospho-regulated clearance of excess CCAN subunits facilitates efficient centromere-dependent kinetochore assembly. Our results suggest a novel strategy for how phospho-degrons can be used to regulate the assembly of multi-subunit complexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Böhm
- Department of Molecular Genetics I, Faculty of Biology, Center of Medical Biotechnology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Kerstin Killinger
- Department of Molecular Genetics I, Faculty of Biology, Center of Medical Biotechnology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Alexander Dudziak
- Department of Molecular Genetics I, Faculty of Biology, Center of Medical Biotechnology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Pradeep Pant
- Department of Computational Biochemistry, Faculty of Biology, Center of Medical Biotechnology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Karolin Jänen
- Department of Molecular Genetics I, Faculty of Biology, Center of Medical Biotechnology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Simone Hohoff
- Department of Molecular Genetics I, Faculty of Biology, Center of Medical Biotechnology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Karl Mechtler
- IMP - Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna, Austria.,Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.,Gregor Mendel Institute (GMI), Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Mihkel Örd
- Institute of Technology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Mart Loog
- Institute of Technology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Elsa Sanchez-Garcia
- Department of Computational Biochemistry, Faculty of Biology, Center of Medical Biotechnology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Stefan Westermann
- Department of Molecular Genetics I, Faculty of Biology, Center of Medical Biotechnology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
DNA methylation and histone variants in aging and cancer. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF CELL AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 2021; 364:1-110. [PMID: 34507780 DOI: 10.1016/bs.ircmb.2021.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Aging-related diseases such as cancer can be traced to the accumulation of molecular disorder including increased DNA mutations and epigenetic drift. We provide a comprehensive review of recent results in mice and humans on modifications of DNA methylation and histone variants during aging and in cancer. Accumulated errors in DNA methylation maintenance lead to global decreases in DNA methylation with relaxed repression of repeated DNA and focal hypermethylation blocking the expression of tumor suppressor genes. Epigenetic clocks based on quantifying levels of DNA methylation at specific genomic sites is proving to be a valuable metric for estimating the biological age of individuals. Histone variants have specialized functions in transcriptional regulation and genome stability. Their concentration tends to increase in aged post-mitotic chromatin, but their effects in cancer are mainly determined by their specialized functions. Our increased understanding of epigenetic regulation and their modifications during aging has motivated interventions to delay or reverse epigenetic modifications using the epigenetic clocks as a rapid readout for efficacity. Similarly, the knowledge of epigenetic modifications in cancer is suggesting new approaches to target these modifications for cancer therapy.
Collapse
|
23
|
Zhou N, Shi L, Shan S, Zhou Z. Molecular basis for the selective recognition and ubiquitination of centromeric histone H3 by yeast E3 ligase Psh1. J Genet Genomics 2021; 48:463-472. [PMID: 34217622 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgg.2021.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Centromeres are chromosomal loci marked by histone variant CenH3 (centromeric histone H3) and essential for genomic stability and cell division. The budding yeast E3 ubiquitin ligase Psh1 selectively recognizes the yeast CenH3 (Cse4) for ubiquitination and controls the cellular level of Cse4 for proteolysis, but the underlying mechanism remains largely unknown. Here, we show that Psh1 uses a Cse4-binding domain (CBD, residues 1-211) to interact with Cse4-H4 instead of H3-H4, yielding a dissociation constant (Kd) of 27 nM. Psh1 recognizes Cse4-specific residues in the L1 loop and α2 helix to ensure Cse4 binding and ubiquitination. We map the Psh1-binding region of Cse4-H4 and identify a wide range of Cse4-specific residues required for the Psh1-mediated Cse4 recognition and ubiquitination. Further analyses reveal that histone chaperone Scm3 can impair Cse4 ubiquitination by abrogating Psh1-Cse4 binding. Together, our study reveals a novel Cse4-binding mode distinct from those of known CenH3 chaperones and elucidates the mechanism by which Scm3 competes with Psh1 for Cse4 binding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Zhou
- National Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100089, China
| | - Liuxin Shi
- National Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100089, China
| | - Shan Shan
- National Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Zheng Zhou
- National Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100089, China.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hartley GA, Okhovat M, O'Neill RJ, Carbone L. Comparative analyses of gibbon centromeres reveal dynamic genus specific shifts in repeat composition. Mol Biol Evol 2021; 38:3972-3992. [PMID: 33983366 PMCID: PMC8382927 DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msab148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Centromeres are functionally conserved chromosomal loci essential for proper chromosome segregation during cell division, yet they show high sequence diversity across species. Despite their variation, a near universal feature of centromeres is the presence of repetitive sequences, such as DNA satellites and transposable elements (TEs). Because of their rapidly evolving karyotypes, gibbons represent a compelling model to investigate divergence of functional centromere sequences across short evolutionary timescales. In this study, we use ChIP-seq, RNA-seq, and fluorescence in situ hybridization to comprehensively investigate the centromeric repeat content of the four extant gibbon genera (Hoolock, Hylobates, Nomascus, and Siamang). In all gibbon genera, we find that CENP-A nucleosomes and the DNA-proteins that interface with the inner kinetochore preferentially bind retroelements of broad classes rather than satellite DNA. A previously identified gibbon-specific composite retrotransposon, LAVA, known to be expanded within the centromere regions of one gibbon genus (Hoolock), displays centromere- and species-specific sequence differences, potentially as a result of its co-option to a centromeric function. When dissecting centromere satellite composition, we discovered the presence of the retroelement-derived macrosatellite SST1 in multiple centromeres of Hoolock, whereas alpha-satellites represent the predominate satellite in the other genera, further suggesting an independent evolutionary trajectory for Hoolock centromeres. Finally, using de novo assembly of centromere sequences, we determined that transcripts originating from gibbon centromeres recapitulate the species-specific TE composition. Combined, our data reveal dynamic shifts in the repeat content that define gibbon centromeres and coincide with the extensive karyotypic diversity within this lineage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabrielle A Hartley
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269
| | - Mariam Okhovat
- Department of Medicine, Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, 97239
| | - Rachel J O'Neill
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269.,Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269.,Department of Genomics and Genome Sciences, UConn Health, Farmington, CT, 06030
| | - Lucia Carbone
- Department of Medicine, Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, 97239.,Division of Genetics, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton, OR, 97006.,Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, 97239.,Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, 97239
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lin Z, Yuen KWY. RbAp46/48LIN-53 and HAT-1 are required for initial CENP-AHCP-3 deposition and de novo holocentromere formation on artificial chromosomes in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:9154-9173. [PMID: 33872374 PMCID: PMC8450102 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Revised: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Foreign DNA microinjected into the Caenorhabditis elegans syncytial gonad forms episomal extra-chromosomal arrays, or artificial chromosomes (ACs), in embryos. Short, linear DNA fragments injected concatemerize into high molecular weight (HMW) DNA arrays that are visible as punctate DAPI-stained foci in oocytes, and they undergo chromatinization and centromerization in embryos. The inner centromere, inner kinetochore and spindle checkpoint components, including AIR-2, CENP-AHCP-3, Mis18BP1KNL-2 and BUB-1, respectively, assemble onto the nascent ACs during the first mitosis. The DNA replication efficiency of ACs improves over several cell cycles, which correlates with the improvement of kinetochore bi-orientation and proper segregation of ACs. Depletion of condensin II subunits, like CAPG-2 and SMC-4, but not the replicative helicase component, MCM-2, reduces de novo CENP-AHCP-3 level on nascent ACs. Furthermore, H3K9ac, H4K5ac and H4K12ac are highly enriched on newly chromatinized ACs. RbAp46/48LIN-53 and HAT-1, which affect the acetylation of histone H3 and H4, are essential for chromatinization, de novo centromere formation and segregation competency of nascent ACs. RbAp46/48LIN-53 or HAT-1 depletion causes the loss of both CENP-AHCP-3 and Mis18BP1KNL-2 initial deposition at de novo centromeres on ACs. This phenomenon is different from centromere maintenance on endogenous chromosomes, where Mis18BP1KNL-2 functions upstream of RbAp46/48LIN-53.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhongyang Lin
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong. Kadoorie Biological Sciences Building, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong
| | - Karen Wing Yee Yuen
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong. Kadoorie Biological Sciences Building, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wang N, Liu J, Ricci WA, Gent JI, Dawe RK. Maize centromeric chromatin scales with changes in genome size. Genetics 2021; 217:iyab020. [PMID: 33857306 PMCID: PMC8049547 DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyab020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 01/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Centromeres are defined by the location of Centromeric Histone H3 (CENP-A/CENH3) which interacts with DNA to define the locations and sizes of functional centromeres. An analysis of 26 maize genomes including 110 fully assembled centromeric regions revealed positive relationships between centromere size and genome size. These effects are independent of variation in the amounts of the major centromeric satellite sequence CentC. We also backcrossed known centromeres into two different lines with larger genomes and observed consistent increases in functional centromere sizes for multiple centromeres. Although changes in centromere size involve changes in bound CENH3, we could not mimic the effect by overexpressing CENH3 by threefold. Literature from other fields demonstrate that changes in genome size affect protein levels, organelle size and cell size. Our data demonstrate that centromere size is among these scalable features, and that multiple limiting factors together contribute to a stable centromere size equilibrium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Na Wang
- Department of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, Athens GA 30602, USA
| | - Jianing Liu
- Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens GA 30602, USA
| | - William A Ricci
- Department of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, Athens GA 30602, USA
| | - Jonathan I Gent
- Department of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, Athens GA 30602, USA
| | - R Kelly Dawe
- Department of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, Athens GA 30602, USA
- Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens GA 30602, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Leclerc S, Kitagawa K. The Role of Human Centromeric RNA in Chromosome Stability. Front Mol Biosci 2021; 8:642732. [PMID: 33869284 PMCID: PMC8044762 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.642732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Chromosome instability is a hallmark of cancer and is caused by inaccurate segregation of chromosomes. One cellular structure used to avoid this fate is the kinetochore, which binds to the centromere on the chromosome. Human centromeres are poorly understood, since sequencing and analyzing repeated alpha-satellite DNA regions, which can span a few megabases at the centromere, are particularly difficult. However, recent analyses revealed that these regions are actively transcribed and that transcription levels are tightly regulated, unveiling a possible role of RNA at the centromere. In this short review, we focus on the recent discovery of the function of human centromeric RNA in the regulation and structure of the centromere, and discuss the consequences of dysregulation of centromeric RNA in cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Leclerc
- Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Katsumi Kitagawa
- Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Navarro AP, Cheeseman IM. Kinetochore assembly throughout the cell cycle. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2021; 117:62-74. [PMID: 33753005 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2021.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The kinetochore plays an essential role in facilitating chromosome segregation during cell division. This massive protein complex assembles onto the centromere of chromosomes and enables their attachment to spindle microtubules during mitosis. The kinetochore also functions as a signaling hub to regulate cell cycle progression, and is crucial to ensuring the fidelity of chromosome segregation. Despite the fact that kinetochores are large and robust molecular assemblies, they are also highly dynamic structures that undergo structural and organizational changes throughout the cell cycle. This review will highlight our current understanding of kinetochore structure and function, focusing on the dynamic processes that underlie kinetochore assembly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra P Navarro
- Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, 455 Main Street, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Iain M Cheeseman
- Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, 455 Main Street, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Moreno-Moreno O, Torras-Llort M, Azorin F. The E3-ligases SCFPpa and APC/CCdh1 co-operate to regulate CENP-ACID expression across the cell cycle. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:3395-3406. [PMID: 30753559 PMCID: PMC6468245 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2018] [Revised: 01/22/2019] [Accepted: 01/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Centromere identity is determined by the specific deposition of CENP-A, a histone H3 variant localizing exclusively at centromeres. Increased CENP-A expression, which is a frequent event in cancer, causes mislocalization, ectopic kinetochore assembly and genomic instability. Proteolysis regulates CENP-A expression and prevents its misincorporation across chromatin. How proteolysis restricts CENP-A localization to centromeres is not well understood. Here we report that, in Drosophila, CENP-ACID expression levels are regulated throughout the cell cycle by the combined action of SCFPpa and APC/CCdh1. We show that SCFPpa regulates CENP-ACID expression in G1 and, importantly, in S-phase preventing its promiscuous incorporation across chromatin during replication. In G1, CENP-ACID expression is also regulated by APC/CCdh1. We also show that Cal1, the specific chaperone that deposits CENP-ACID at centromeres, protects CENP-ACID from SCFPpa-mediated degradation but not from APC/CCdh1-mediated degradation. These results suggest that, whereas SCFPpa targets the fraction of CENP-ACID that is not in complex with Cal1, APC/CCdh1 mediates also degradation of the Cal1-CENP-ACID complex and, thus, likely contributes to the regulation of centromeric CENP-ACID deposition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Moreno-Moreno
- Institute of Molecular Biology of Barcelona, IBMB, CSIC. Baldiri Reixac 4. 08028 Barcelona, Spain.,Institute for Research in Biomedicine, IRB Barcelona. The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology. Baldiri Reixac 10, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mònica Torras-Llort
- Institute of Molecular Biology of Barcelona, IBMB, CSIC. Baldiri Reixac 4. 08028 Barcelona, Spain.,Institute for Research in Biomedicine, IRB Barcelona. The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology. Baldiri Reixac 10, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fernando Azorin
- Institute of Molecular Biology of Barcelona, IBMB, CSIC. Baldiri Reixac 4. 08028 Barcelona, Spain.,Institute for Research in Biomedicine, IRB Barcelona. The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology. Baldiri Reixac 10, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sharma AB, Dimitrov S, Hamiche A, Van Dyck E. Centromeric and ectopic assembly of CENP-A chromatin in health and cancer: old marks and new tracks. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:1051-1069. [PMID: 30590707 PMCID: PMC6379705 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky1298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2018] [Revised: 12/13/2018] [Accepted: 12/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The histone H3 variant CENP-A confers epigenetic identity to the centromere and plays crucial roles in the assembly and function of the kinetochore, thus ensuring proper segregation of our chromosomes. CENP-A containing nucleosomes exhibit unique structural specificities and lack the complex profile of gene expression-associated histone posttranslational modifications found in canonical histone H3 and the H3.3 variant. CENP-A mislocalization into noncentromeric regions resulting from its overexpression leads to chromosomal segregation aberrations and genome instability. Overexpression of CENP-A is a feature of many cancers and is associated with malignant progression and poor outcome. The recent years have seen impressive progress in our understanding of the mechanisms that orchestrate CENP-A deposition at native centromeres and ectopic loci. They have witnessed the description of novel, heterotypic CENP-A/H3.3 nucleosome particles and the exploration of the phenotypes associated with the deregulation of CENP-A and its chaperones in tumor cells. Here, we review the structural specificities of CENP-A nucleosomes, the epigenetic features that characterize the centrochromatin and the mechanisms and factors that orchestrate CENP-A deposition at centromeres. We then review our knowledge of CENP-A ectopic distribution, highlighting experimental strategies that have enabled key discoveries. Finally, we discuss the implications of deregulated CENP-A in cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhishek Bharadwaj Sharma
- NORLUX Neuro-Oncology Laboratory, Department of Oncology, Luxembourg Institute of Health (LIH), 84 Val Fleuri, L-1526 Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Stefan Dimitrov
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS UMR 5309, INSERM U1209, Institute for Advanced Biosciences (IAB), Site Santé-Allée des Alpes, 38700 La Tronche, France.,Izmir Biomedicine and Genome Center, İzmir, Turkey
| | - Ali Hamiche
- Département de Génomique Fonctionnelle et Cancer, Institut de Génétique et Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire (IGBMC), Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, INSERM, 67404 Illkirch Cedex, France
| | - Eric Van Dyck
- NORLUX Neuro-Oncology Laboratory, Department of Oncology, Luxembourg Institute of Health (LIH), 84 Val Fleuri, L-1526 Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
DNA replication acts as an error correction mechanism to maintain centromere identity by restricting CENP-A to centromeres. Nat Cell Biol 2019; 21:743-754. [PMID: 31160708 DOI: 10.1038/s41556-019-0331-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2018] [Accepted: 04/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Chromatin assembled with the histone H3 variant CENP-A is the heritable epigenetic determinant of human centromere identity. Using genome-wide mapping and reference models for 23 human centromeres, CENP-A binding sites are identified within the megabase-long, repetitive α-satellite DNAs at each centromere. CENP-A is shown in early G1 to be assembled into nucleosomes within each centromere and onto 11,390 transcriptionally active sites on the chromosome arms. DNA replication is demonstrated to remove ectopically loaded, non-centromeric CENP-A. In contrast, tethering of centromeric CENP-A to the sites of DNA replication through the constitutive centromere associated network (CCAN) is shown to enable precise reloading of centromere-bound CENP-A onto the same DNA sequences as in its initial prereplication loading. Thus, DNA replication acts as an error correction mechanism for maintaining centromere identity through its removal of non-centromeric CENP-A coupled with CCAN-mediated retention and precise reloading of centromeric CENP-A.
Collapse
|
32
|
Mishra PK, Olafsson G, Boeckmann L, Westlake TJ, Jowhar ZM, Dittman LE, Baker RE, D’Amours D, Thorpe PH, Basrai MA. Cell cycle-dependent association of polo kinase Cdc5 with CENP-A contributes to faithful chromosome segregation in budding yeast. Mol Biol Cell 2019; 30:1020-1036. [PMID: 30726152 PMCID: PMC6589903 DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e18-09-0584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2018] [Revised: 01/04/2019] [Accepted: 01/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Evolutionarily conserved polo-like kinase, Cdc5 (Plk1 in humans), associates with kinetochores during mitosis; however, the role of cell cycle-dependent centromeric ( CEN) association of Cdc5 and its substrates that exclusively localize to the kinetochore have not been characterized. Here we report that evolutionarily conserved CEN histone H3 variant, Cse4 (CENP-A in humans), is a substrate of Cdc5, and that the cell cycle-regulated association of Cse4 with Cdc5 is required for cell growth. Cdc5 contributes to Cse4 phosphorylation in vivo and interacts with Cse4 in mitotic cells. Mass spectrometry analysis of in vitro kinase assays showed that Cdc5 phosphorylates nine serine residues clustered within the N-terminus of Cse4. Strains with cse4-9SA exhibit increased errors in chromosome segregation, reduced levels of CEN-associated Mif2 and Mcd1/Scc1 when combined with a deletion of MCM21. Moreover, the loss of Cdc5 from the CEN chromatin contributes to defects in kinetochore integrity and reduction in CEN-associated Cse4. The cell cycle-regulated association of Cdc5 with Cse4 is essential for cell viability as constitutive association of Cdc5 with Cse4 at the kinetochore leads to growth defects. In summary, our results have defined a role for Cdc5-mediated Cse4 phosphorylation in faithful chromosome segregation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prashant K. Mishra
- Genetics Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - Gudjon Olafsson
- School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom
| | - Lars Boeckmann
- Genetics Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - Timothy J. Westlake
- Genetics Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - Ziad M. Jowhar
- Genetics Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - Lauren E. Dittman
- Genetics Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - Richard E. Baker
- Department of Microbiology and Physiological Systems, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655
| | - Damien D’Amours
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
| | - Peter H. Thorpe
- School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom
| | - Munira A. Basrai
- Genetics Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Centromere Repeats: Hidden Gems of the Genome. Genes (Basel) 2019; 10:genes10030223. [PMID: 30884847 PMCID: PMC6471113 DOI: 10.3390/genes10030223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2019] [Revised: 03/07/2019] [Accepted: 03/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Satellite DNAs are now regarded as powerful and active contributors to genomic and chromosomal evolution. Paired with mobile transposable elements, these repetitive sequences provide a dynamic mechanism through which novel karyotypic modifications and chromosomal rearrangements may occur. In this review, we discuss the regulatory activity of satellite DNA and their neighboring transposable elements in a chromosomal context with a particular emphasis on the integral role of both in centromere function. In addition, we discuss the varied mechanisms by which centromeric repeats have endured evolutionary processes, producing a novel, species-specific centromeric landscape despite sharing a ubiquitously conserved function. Finally, we highlight the role these repetitive elements play in the establishment and functionality of de novo centromeres and chromosomal breakpoints that underpin karyotypic variation. By emphasizing these unique activities of satellite DNAs and transposable elements, we hope to disparage the conventional exemplification of repetitive DNA in the historically-associated context of ‘junk’.
Collapse
|
34
|
Niikura Y, Kitagawa R, Kitagawa K. CENP-A Ubiquitylation Contributes to Maintaining the Chromosomal Location of the Centromere. Molecules 2019; 24:molecules24030402. [PMID: 30678315 PMCID: PMC6384693 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24030402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2018] [Revised: 01/15/2019] [Accepted: 01/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The centromere plays an essential role in accurate chromosome segregation, and the chromosomal location of the centromere is determined by the presence of a histone H3 variant, centromere protein A (CENP-A), in centromeric nucleosomes. However, the precise mechanisms of deposition, maintenance, and inheritance of CENP-A at centromeres are unclear. We have reported that CENP-A deposition requires ubiquitylation of CENP-A lysine 124 mediated by the E3 ligase activity of Cullin 4A (CUL4A)—RING-box protein 1 (RBX1)—COP9 signalsome complex subunit 8 (COPS8). We have proposed a model of inheritance for CENP-A ubiquitylation, through dimerization between rounds of cell divisions, that maintains the position of centromeres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yohei Niikura
- Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, Department of Molecular Medicine, UT Health Science Center San Antonio School of Medicine, 8403 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229-3000, USA.
- MOE Key Laboratory of Model Animal for Disease Study, Model Animal Research Center, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210061, China.
| | - Risa Kitagawa
- Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, Department of Molecular Medicine, UT Health Science Center San Antonio School of Medicine, 8403 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229-3000, USA.
| | - Katsumi Kitagawa
- Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, Department of Molecular Medicine, UT Health Science Center San Antonio School of Medicine, 8403 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229-3000, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
French BT, Straight AF. CDK phosphorylation of Xenopus laevis M18BP1 promotes its metaphase centromere localization. EMBO J 2019; 38:embj.2018100093. [PMID: 30606714 DOI: 10.15252/embj.2018100093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2018] [Revised: 12/07/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Chromosome segregation requires the centromere, the site on chromosomes where kinetochores assemble in mitosis to attach chromosomes to the mitotic spindle. Centromere identity is defined epigenetically by the presence of nucleosomes containing the histone H3 variant CENP-A. New CENP-A nucleosome assembly occurs at the centromere every cell cycle during G1, but how CENP-A nucleosome assembly is spatially and temporally restricted remains poorly understood. Centromere recruitment of factors required for CENP-A assembly is mediated in part by the three-protein Mis18 complex (Mis18α, Mis18β, M18BP1). Here, we show that Xenopus M18BP1 localizes to centromeres during metaphase-prior to CENP-A assembly-by binding to CENP-C using a highly conserved SANTA domain. We find that Cdk phosphorylation of M18BP1 is necessary for M18BP1 to bind CENP-C and localize to centromeres in metaphase. Surprisingly, mutations which disrupt the metaphase M18BP1/CENP-C interaction cause defective nuclear localization of M18BP1 in interphase, resulting in defective CENP-A nucleosome assembly. We propose that M18BP1 may identify centromeric sites in metaphase for subsequent CENP-A nucleosome assembly in interphase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley T French
- Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Aaron F Straight
- Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Barra V, Fachinetti D. The dark side of centromeres: types, causes and consequences of structural abnormalities implicating centromeric DNA. Nat Commun 2018; 9:4340. [PMID: 30337534 PMCID: PMC6194107 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06545-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 164] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2018] [Accepted: 09/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Centromeres are the chromosomal domains required to ensure faithful transmission of the genome during cell division. They have a central role in preventing aneuploidy, by orchestrating the assembly of several components required for chromosome separation. However, centromeres also adopt a complex structure that makes them susceptible to being sites of chromosome rearrangements. Therefore, preservation of centromere integrity is a difficult, but important task for the cell. In this review, we discuss how centromeres could potentially be a source of genome instability and how centromere aberrations and rearrangements are linked with human diseases such as cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Barra
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS, UMR 144, 26 rue d'Ulm, F-75005, Paris, France
| | - D Fachinetti
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS, UMR 144, 26 rue d'Ulm, F-75005, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Mendiratta S, Gatto A, Almouzni G. Histone supply: Multitiered regulation ensures chromatin dynamics throughout the cell cycle. J Cell Biol 2018; 218:39-54. [PMID: 30257851 PMCID: PMC6314538 DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201807179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Revised: 09/05/2018] [Accepted: 09/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Mendiratta et al. review the interplay between the different regulatory layers that affect the transcription and dynamics of distinct histone H3 variants along the cell cycle. As the building blocks of chromatin, histones are central to establish and maintain particular chromatin states associated with given cell fates. Importantly, histones exist as distinct variants whose expression and incorporation into chromatin are tightly regulated during the cell cycle. During S phase, specialized replicative histone variants ensure the bulk of the chromatinization of the duplicating genome. Other non-replicative histone variants deposited throughout the cell cycle at specific loci use pathways uncoupled from DNA synthesis. Here, we review the particular dynamics of expression, cellular transit, assembly, and disassembly of replicative and non-replicative forms of the histone H3. Beyond the role of histone variants in chromatin dynamics, we review our current knowledge concerning their distinct regulation to control their expression at different levels including transcription, posttranscriptional processing, and protein stability. In light of this unique regulation, we highlight situations where perturbations in histone balance may lead to cellular dysfunction and pathologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shweta Mendiratta
- Institut Curie, Paris Sciences et Lettres Research University, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR3664, Equipe Labellisée Ligue contre le Cancer, Paris, France.,Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 06, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR3664, Paris, France
| | - Alberto Gatto
- Institut Curie, Paris Sciences et Lettres Research University, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR3664, Equipe Labellisée Ligue contre le Cancer, Paris, France.,Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 06, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR3664, Paris, France
| | - Genevieve Almouzni
- Institut Curie, Paris Sciences et Lettres Research University, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR3664, Equipe Labellisée Ligue contre le Cancer, Paris, France .,Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 06, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR3664, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Verma G, Surolia N. Centromere and its associated proteins-what we know about them in Plasmodium falciparum. IUBMB Life 2018; 70:732-742. [PMID: 29935010 DOI: 10.1002/iub.1878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Accepted: 04/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The complex life cycle of intracellular parasitic protozoans entails multiple rounds of DNA replication and mitosis followed by cytokinesis to release daughter parasites. To gain insights into mitotic events it is imperative to identify the biomarkers that constitute the chromosome segregation machinery in the parasite. Chromosomal loci called centromeres and their associated proteins play an essential role in accurate chromosome segregation. Although new information on the centromere-kinetochore proteins has been added to the existing pool of knowledge, a paucity of biomarkers for nuclear division prevents a global view of chromosome segregation mechanism in the malaria parasite. In Plasmodium falciparum, except CENH3 and CENP-C homologues, other centromere associated proteins responsible for centromere functions and kinetochore assembly are not known. The focus of this review is to summarize the current understanding on the centromere organization and its associated proteins in eukaryotes with the emerging information in P. falciparum. © 2018 IUBMB Life, 70(8):732-742, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garima Verma
- Molecular Parasitology Laboratory, Molecular Biology and Genetics Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Jakkur, Bangalore, India.,W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Namita Surolia
- Molecular Parasitology Laboratory, Molecular Biology and Genetics Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Jakkur, Bangalore, India
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Shrestha RL, Ahn GS, Staples MI, Sathyan KM, Karpova TS, Foltz DR, Basrai MA. Mislocalization of centromeric histone H3 variant CENP-A contributes to chromosomal instability (CIN) in human cells. Oncotarget 2018; 8:46781-46800. [PMID: 28596481 PMCID: PMC5564523 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2017] [Accepted: 05/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Chromosomal instability (CIN) is a hallmark of many cancers and a major contributor to tumorigenesis. Centromere and kinetochore associated proteins such as the evolutionarily conserved centromeric histone H3 variant CENP-A, associate with centromeric DNA for centromere function and chromosomal stability. Stringent regulation of cellular CENP-A levels prevents its mislocalization in yeast and flies to maintain genome stability. CENP-A overexpression and mislocalization are observed in several cancers and reported to be associated with increased invasiveness and poor prognosis. We examined whether there is a direct relationship between mislocalization of overexpressed CENP-A and CIN using HeLa and chromosomally stable diploid RPE1 cell lines as model systems. Our results show that mislocalization of overexpressed CENP-A to chromosome arms leads to chromosome congression defects, lagging chromosomes, micronuclei formation and a delay in mitotic exit. CENP-A overexpressing cells showed altered localization of centromere and kinetochore associated proteins such as CENP-C, CENP-T and Nuf2 leading to weakened native kinetochores as shown by reduced interkinetochore distance and CIN. Importantly, our results show that mislocalization of CENP-A to chromosome arms is one of the major contributors for CIN as depletion of histone chaperone DAXX prevents CENP-A mislocalization and rescues the reduced interkinetochore distance and CIN phenotype in CENP-A overexpressing cells. In summary, our results establish that CENP-A overexpression and mislocalization result in a CIN phenotype in human cells. This study provides insights into how overexpression of CENP-A may contribute to CIN in cancers and underscore the importance of understanding the pathways that prevent CENP-A mislocalization for genome stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Grace S Ahn
- Genetics Branch, CCR, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Kizhakke M Sathyan
- Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Tatiana S Karpova
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, CCR, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Daniel R Foltz
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Wang N, Dawe RK. Centromere Size and Its Relationship to Haploid Formation in Plants. MOLECULAR PLANT 2018; 11:398-406. [PMID: 29277426 DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2017] [Revised: 12/07/2017] [Accepted: 12/12/2017] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
Wide species crosses often result in uniparental genome elimination and visible failures in centromere function. Crosses involving lines with mutated forms of the CENH3 histone variant that organizes the centromere/kinetochore interface have been shown to have similar effects, inducing haploids at high frequencies. Here, we propose a simple centromere size model that endeavors to explain both observations. It is based on the idea of a quantitative centromere architecture where each centromere in an individual is the same size, and the average size is dictated by a natural equilibrium between bound and unbound CENH3 (and its chaperones or binding proteins). While centromere size is determined by the cellular milieu, centromere positions are heritable and defined by the interactions of a small set of proteins that bind to both DNA and CENH3. Lines with defective or mutated CENH3 have a lower loading capacity and support smaller centromeres. In cases where a line with small or defective centromeres is crossed to a line with larger or normal centromeres, the smaller/defective centromeres are selectively degraded or not maintained, resulting in chromosome loss from the small-centromere parent. The model is testable and generalizable, and helps to explain the counterintuitive observation that inducer lines do not induce haploids when crossed to themselves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Na Wang
- Department of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
| | - R Kelly Dawe
- Department of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA; Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Üretmen Kagıalı ZC, Şentürk A, Özkan Küçük NE, Qureshi MH, Özlü N. Proteomics in Cell Division. Proteomics 2017; 17. [PMID: 28548456 DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201600100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2016] [Revised: 04/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Cell division requires a coordinated action of the cell cycle machinery, cytoskeletal elements, chromosomes, and membranes. Cell division studies have greatly benefitted from the mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomic approaches for probing the biochemistry of highly dynamic complexes and their coordination with each other as a cell progresses into division. In this review, the authors first summarize a wide-range of proteomic studies that focus on the identification of sub-cellular components/protein complexes of the cell division machinery including kinetochores, mitotic spindle, midzone, and centrosomes. The authors also highlight MS-based large-scale analyses of the cellular components that are largely understudied during cell division such as the cell surface and lipids. Then, the authors focus on posttranslational modification analyses, especially phosphorylation and the resulting crosstalk with other modifications as a cell undergoes cell division. Combining proteomic approaches that probe the biochemistry of cell division components with functional genomic assays will lead to breakthroughs toward a systems-level understanding of cell division.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aydanur Şentürk
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Mohammad Haroon Qureshi
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.,Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Nurhan Özlü
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Niikura Y, Kitagawa R, Ogi H, Kitagawa K. SGT1-HSP90 complex is required for CENP-A deposition at centromeres. Cell Cycle 2017; 16:1683-1694. [PMID: 28816574 PMCID: PMC5602426 DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2017.1325039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The centromere plays an essential role in accurate chromosome segregation, and defects in its function lead to aneuploidy and thus cancer. The centromere-specific histone H3 variant CENP-A is proposed to be the epigenetic mark of the centromere, as active centromeres require CENP-A–containing nucleosomes to direct the recruitment of multiple kinetochore proteins. CENP-A K124 ubiquitylation, mediated by CUL4A-RBX1-COPS8 E3 ligase activity, is required for CENP-A deposition at the centromere. However, the mechanism that controls the E3 ligase activity of the CUL4A-RBX1-COPS8 complex remains obscure. We have discovered that the SGT1-HSP90 complex is required for recognition of CENP-A by COPS8. Thus, the SGT1-HSP90 complex contributes to the E3 ligase activity of the CUL4A complex that is necessary for CENP-A ubiquitylation and CENP-A deposition at the centromere.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yohei Niikura
- a Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute , Department of Molecular Medicine, UT Health Science Center San Antonio School of Medicine , San Antonio , TX , USA.,b The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital , Columbus , OH , USA
| | - Risa Kitagawa
- a Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute , Department of Molecular Medicine, UT Health Science Center San Antonio School of Medicine , San Antonio , TX , USA.,b The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital , Columbus , OH , USA
| | - Hiroo Ogi
- b The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital , Columbus , OH , USA
| | - Katsumi Kitagawa
- a Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute , Department of Molecular Medicine, UT Health Science Center San Antonio School of Medicine , San Antonio , TX , USA.,b The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital , Columbus , OH , USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
CENP-A regulates chromosome segregation during the first meiosis of mouse oocytes. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 37:313-318. [PMID: 28585134 DOI: 10.1007/s11596-017-1733-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2016] [Revised: 09/09/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Proper chromosome separation in both mitosis and meiosis depends on the correct connection between kinetochores of chromosomes and spindle microtubules. Kinetochore dysfunction can lead to unequal distribution of chromosomes during cell division and result in aneuploidy, thus kinetochores are critical for faithful segregation of chromosomes. Centromere protein A (CENP-A) is an important component of the inner kinetochore plate. Multiple studies in mitosis have found that deficiencies in CENP-A could result in structural and functional changes of kinetochores, leading to abnormal chromosome segregation, aneuploidy and apoptosis in cells. Here we report the expression and function of CENP-A during mouse oocyte meiosis. Our study found that microinjection of CENP-A blocking antibody resulted in errors of homologous chromosome segregation and caused aneuploidy in eggs. Thus, our findings provide evidence that CENP-A is critical for the faithful chromosome segregation during mammalian oocyte meiosis.
Collapse
|
44
|
Filipescu D, Naughtin M, Podsypanina K, Lejour V, Wilson L, Gurard-Levin ZA, Orsi GA, Simeonova I, Toufektchan E, Attardi LD, Toledo F, Almouzni G. Essential role for centromeric factors following p53 loss and oncogenic transformation. Genes Dev 2017; 31:463-480. [PMID: 28356341 PMCID: PMC5393061 DOI: 10.1101/gad.290924.116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2016] [Accepted: 02/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
In mammals, centromere definition involves the histone variant CENP-A (centromere protein A), deposited by its chaperone, HJURP (Holliday junction recognition protein). Alterations in this process impair chromosome segregation and genome stability, which are also compromised by p53 inactivation in cancer. Here we found that CENP-A and HJURP are transcriptionally up-regulated in p53-null human tumors. Using an established mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) model combining p53 inactivation with E1A or HRas-V12 oncogene expression, we reproduced a similar up-regulation of HJURP and CENP-A. We delineate functional CDE/CHR motifs within the Hjurp and Cenpa promoters and demonstrate their roles in p53-mediated repression. To assess the importance of HJURP up-regulation in transformed murine and human cells, we used a CRISPR/Cas9 approach. Remarkably, depletion of HJURP leads to distinct outcomes depending on their p53 status. Functional p53 elicits a cell cycle arrest response, whereas, in p53-null transformed cells, the absence of arrest enables the loss of HJURP to induce severe aneuploidy and, ultimately, apoptotic cell death. We thus tested the impact of HJURP depletion in pre-established allograft tumors in mice and revealed a major block of tumor progression in vivo. We discuss a model in which an "epigenetic addiction" to the HJURP chaperone represents an Achilles' heel in p53-deficient transformed cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Filipescu
- Institut Curie, Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL) Research University, UMR3664, Centre Nationnal de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Equipe Labellisée Ligue contre le Cancer, F-75005 Paris, France
- Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC) Université Paris 06, UMR3664, CNRS, F-75005 Paris, France
| | - Monica Naughtin
- Institut Curie, Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL) Research University, UMR3664, Centre Nationnal de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Equipe Labellisée Ligue contre le Cancer, F-75005 Paris, France
- Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC) Université Paris 06, UMR3664, CNRS, F-75005 Paris, France
| | - Katrina Podsypanina
- Institut Curie, Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL) Research University, UMR3664, Centre Nationnal de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Equipe Labellisée Ligue contre le Cancer, F-75005 Paris, France
- Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC) Université Paris 06, UMR3664, CNRS, F-75005 Paris, France
| | - Vincent Lejour
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, UMR3244, CNRS, Equipe Labellisée Ligue contre le Cancer, F-75005 Paris, France
- Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06, UMR3244, CNRS, F-75005 Paris, France
| | - Laurence Wilson
- Institut Curie, Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL) Research University, UMR3664, Centre Nationnal de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Equipe Labellisée Ligue contre le Cancer, F-75005 Paris, France
- Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC) Université Paris 06, UMR3664, CNRS, F-75005 Paris, France
| | - Zachary A Gurard-Levin
- Institut Curie, Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL) Research University, UMR3664, Centre Nationnal de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Equipe Labellisée Ligue contre le Cancer, F-75005 Paris, France
- Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC) Université Paris 06, UMR3664, CNRS, F-75005 Paris, France
| | - Guillermo A Orsi
- Institut Curie, Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL) Research University, UMR3664, Centre Nationnal de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Equipe Labellisée Ligue contre le Cancer, F-75005 Paris, France
- Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC) Université Paris 06, UMR3664, CNRS, F-75005 Paris, France
| | - Iva Simeonova
- Institut Curie, Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL) Research University, UMR3664, Centre Nationnal de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Equipe Labellisée Ligue contre le Cancer, F-75005 Paris, France
- Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC) Université Paris 06, UMR3664, CNRS, F-75005 Paris, France
| | - Eleonore Toufektchan
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, UMR3244, CNRS, Equipe Labellisée Ligue contre le Cancer, F-75005 Paris, France
- Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06, UMR3244, CNRS, F-75005 Paris, France
| | - Laura D Attardi
- Division of Radiation and Cancer Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - Franck Toledo
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, UMR3244, CNRS, Equipe Labellisée Ligue contre le Cancer, F-75005 Paris, France
- Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06, UMR3244, CNRS, F-75005 Paris, France
| | - Geneviève Almouzni
- Institut Curie, Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL) Research University, UMR3664, Centre Nationnal de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Equipe Labellisée Ligue contre le Cancer, F-75005 Paris, France
- Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC) Université Paris 06, UMR3664, CNRS, F-75005 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Moreno-Moreno O, Torras-Llort M, Azorín F. Variations on a nucleosome theme: The structural basis of centromere function. Bioessays 2017; 39. [PMID: 28220502 DOI: 10.1002/bies.201600241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The centromere is a specialized chromosomal structure that dictates kinetochore assembly and, thus, is essential for accurate chromosome segregation. Centromere identity is determined epigenetically by the presence of a centromere-specific histone H3 variant, CENP-A, that replaces canonical H3 in centromeric chromatin. Here, we discuss recent work by Roulland et al. that identifies structural elements of the nucleosome as essential determinants of centromere function. In particular, CENP-A nucleosomes have flexible DNA ends due to the short αN helix of CENP-A. The higher flexibility of the DNA ends of centromeric nucleosomes impairs binding of linker histones H1, while it facilitates binding of other essential centromeric proteins, such as CENP-C, and is required for mitotic fidelity. This work extends previous observations indicating that the differential structural properties of CENP-A nucleosomes are on the basis of its contribution to centromere identity and function. Here, we discuss the implications of this work and the questions arising from it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Moreno-Moreno
- Institute of Molecular Biology of Barcelona, CSIC, Barcelona, Spain.,Institute for Research in Biomedicine, IRB Barcelona, The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mònica Torras-Llort
- Institute of Molecular Biology of Barcelona, CSIC, Barcelona, Spain.,Institute for Research in Biomedicine, IRB Barcelona, The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fernando Azorín
- Institute of Molecular Biology of Barcelona, CSIC, Barcelona, Spain.,Institute for Research in Biomedicine, IRB Barcelona, The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Musacchio A, Desai A. A Molecular View of Kinetochore Assembly and Function. BIOLOGY 2017; 6:E5. [PMID: 28125021 PMCID: PMC5371998 DOI: 10.3390/biology6010005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 310] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2016] [Revised: 01/16/2017] [Accepted: 01/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Kinetochores are large protein assemblies that connect chromosomes to microtubules of the mitotic and meiotic spindles in order to distribute the replicated genome from a mother cell to its daughters. Kinetochores also control feedback mechanisms responsible for the correction of incorrect microtubule attachments, and for the coordination of chromosome attachment with cell cycle progression. Finally, kinetochores contribute to their own preservation, across generations, at the specific chromosomal loci devoted to host them, the centromeres. They achieve this in most species by exploiting an epigenetic, DNA-sequence-independent mechanism; notable exceptions are budding yeasts where a specific sequence is associated with centromere function. In the last 15 years, extensive progress in the elucidation of the composition of the kinetochore and the identification of various physical and functional modules within its substructure has led to a much deeper molecular understanding of kinetochore organization and the origins of its functional output. Here, we provide a broad summary of this progress, focusing primarily on kinetochores of humans and budding yeast, while highlighting work from other models, and present important unresolved questions for future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Musacchio
- Department of Mechanistic Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Otto-Hahn Straße 11, Dortmund 44227, Germany.
- Centre for Medical Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen 45117, Germany.
| | - Arshad Desai
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
- Department of Cellular & Molecular Medicine, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Zasadzińska E, Foltz DR. Orchestrating the Specific Assembly of Centromeric Nucleosomes. PROGRESS IN MOLECULAR AND SUBCELLULAR BIOLOGY 2017; 56:165-192. [PMID: 28840237 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-58592-5_7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Centromeres are chromosomal loci that are defined epigenetically in most eukaryotes by incorporation of a centromere-specific nucleosome in which the canonical histone H3 variant is replaced by Centromere Protein A (CENP-A). Therefore, the assembly and propagation of centromeric nucleosomes are critical for maintaining centromere identify and ensuring genomic stability. Centromeres direct chromosome segregation (during mitosis and meiosis) by recruiting the constitutive centromere-associated network of proteins throughout the cell cycle that in turn recruits the kinetochore during mitosis. Assembly of centromere-specific nucleosomes in humans requires the dedicated CENP-A chaperone HJURP, and the Mis18 complex to couple the deposition of new CENP-A to the site of the pre-existing centromere, which is essential for maintaining centromere identity. Human CENP-A deposition occurs specifically in early G1, into pre-existing chromatin, and several additional chromatin-associated complexes regulate CENP-A nucleosome deposition and stability. Here we review the current knowledge on how new CENP-A nucleosomes are assembled selectively at the existing centromere in different species and how this process is controlled to ensure stable epigenetic inheritance of the centromere.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ewelina Zasadzińska
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA
| | - Daniel R Foltz
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA. .,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. .,Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Barrey EJ, Heun P. Artificial Chromosomes and Strategies to Initiate Epigenetic Centromere Establishment. PROGRESS IN MOLECULAR AND SUBCELLULAR BIOLOGY 2017; 56:193-212. [PMID: 28840238 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-58592-5_8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
In recent years, various synthetic approaches have been developed to address the question of what directs centromere establishment and maintenance. In this chapter, we will discuss how approaches aimed at constructing synthetic centromeres have co-evolved with and contributed to shape the theory describing the determinants of centromere identity. We will first review lessons learned from artificial chromosomes created from "naked" centromeric sequences to investigate the role of the underlying DNA for centromere formation. We will then discuss how several studies, which applied removal of endogenous centromeres or over-expression of the centromere-specific histone CENP-A, helped to investigate the contribution of chromatin context to centromere establishment. Finally, we will examine various biosynthetic approaches taking advantage of targeting specific proteins to ectopic sites in the genome to dissect the role of many centromere-associated proteins and chromatin modifiers for centromere inheritance and function. Together, these studies showed that chromatin context matters, particularly proximity to heterochromatin or repetitive DNA sequences. Moreover, despite the important contribution of centromeric DNA, the centromere-specific histone H3-variant CENP-A emerges as a key epigenetic mark to establish and maintain functional centromeres on artificial chromosomes or at ectopic sites of the genome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelyne J Barrey
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Patrick Heun
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Histone H4 Facilitates the Proteolysis of the Budding Yeast CENP-ACse4 Centromeric Histone Variant. Genetics 2016; 205:113-124. [PMID: 27794026 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.116.194027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2016] [Accepted: 10/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The incorporation of histone variants into nucleosomes can alter chromatin-based processes. CENP-A is the histone H3 variant found exclusively at centromeres that serves as an epigenetic mark for centromere identity and is required for kinetochore assembly. CENP-A mislocalization to ectopic sites appears to contribute to genomic instability, transcriptional misregulation, and tumorigenesis, so mechanisms exist to ensure its exclusive localization to centromeres. One conserved process is proteolysis, which is mediated by the Psh1 E3 ubiquitin ligase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (budding yeast). To determine whether there are features of the CENP-A nucleosome that facilitate proteolysis, we performed a genetic screen to identify histone H4 residues that regulate CENP-ACse4 degradation. We found that H4-R36 is a key residue that promotes the interaction between CENP-ACse4 and Psh1 Consistent with this, CENP-ACse4 protein levels are stabilized in H4-R36A mutant cells and CENP-ACse4 is enriched in the euchromatin. We propose that the defects in CENP-ACse4 proteolysis may be related to changes in Psh1 localization, as Psh1 becomes enriched at some 3' intergenic regions in H4-R36A mutant cells. Together, these data reveal a key residue in histone H4 that is important for efficient CENP-ACse4 degradation, likely by facilitating the interaction between Psh1 and CENP-ACse4.
Collapse
|
50
|
Niikura Y, Kitagawa R, Kitagawa K. The inheritance of centromere identity. Mol Cell Oncol 2016; 3:e1188226. [PMID: 27652331 PMCID: PMC4972116 DOI: 10.1080/23723556.2016.1188226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2016] [Revised: 05/05/2016] [Accepted: 05/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
CENP-A (Centromere protein A) is a histone H3 variant that epigenetically determines the centromere position, but the mechanism of its centromere inheritance is obscure. We propose that CENP-A ubiquitylation, which is inherited through dimerization between rounds of cell division, is a candidate for the epigenetic mark of centromere identity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yohei Niikura
- Center for Childhood Cancer and Blood Diseases, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital , Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Risa Kitagawa
- Center for Childhood Cancer and Blood Diseases, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital , Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Katsumi Kitagawa
- Center for Childhood Cancer and Blood Diseases, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|