1
|
Nooijen LE, Gustafsson-Liljefors M, Erdmann JI, D'Souza MA, Gilg S, Villard C, Jansson H. Gallbladder cancer mimicking perihilar cholangiocarcinoma-considerable rate of postoperative reclassification with implications for prognosis. World J Surg Oncol 2023; 21:286. [PMID: 37697321 PMCID: PMC10494342 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-023-03171-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For some patients undergoing resection under the suspicion of a perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA), postoperative diagnosis may differ from the preoperative diagnosis. While a postoperative finding of benign bile duct stricture is known to affect 3-15% of patients, less has been described about the consequences of finding other biliary tract cancers postoperatively. This study compared pre- and postoperative diagnoses, risk characteristics, and outcomes after surgery for suspected pCCA. METHODS Retrospective single-center study, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (January 2009-May 2017). The primary postoperative outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes were disease-free survival and postoperative complications. Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Seventy-one patients underwent resection for suspected pCCA. pCCA was confirmed in 48 patients (68%). Ten patients had benign lesions (14%), 2 (3%) were diagnosed with other types of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA, distal n = 1, intrahepatic n = 1), while 11 (15%) were diagnosed with gallbladder cancer (GBC). GBC patients were older than patients with pCCA (median age 71 versus 58 years, p = 0.015), with a large proportion of patients with a high tumor extension stage (≥ T3, 91%). Median overall survival was 20 months (95% CI 15-25 months) for patients with pCCA and 17 months (95% CI 11-23 months) for patients with GBC (p = 0.135). Patients with GBC had significantly shorter median disease-free survival (DFS), 10 months (95% CI 3-17 months) compared 17 months (95% CI 15-19 months) for patients with pCCA (p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS At a large tertiary referral center, 15% of patients resected for suspected pCCA were postoperatively diagnosed with GBC. Compared to patients with pCCA, GBC patients were older, with advanced tumors and shorter DFS. The considerable rate of re-classification stresses the need for improved preoperative staging, as these prognostic differences could have implications for treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn E Nooijen
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maria Gustafsson-Liljefors
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Joris I Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Melroy A D'Souza
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stefan Gilg
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Christina Villard
- Gastroenterology and Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hannes Jansson
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jena SS, Mehta NN, Nundy S. Surgical management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Controversies and recommendations. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2023; 27:227-240. [PMID: 37408334 PMCID: PMC10472117 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.23-028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Hilar cholangiocarcinomas are highly aggressive malignancies. They are usually at an advanced stage at initial presentation. Surgical resection with negative margins is the standard of management. It provides the only chance of cure. Liver transplantation has increased the number of 'curative' procedures for cases previously considered to be unresectable. Meticulous and thorough preoperative planning is required to prevent fatal post-operative complications. Extended resection procedures, including hepatic trisectionectomy for Bismuth type IV tumors, hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy for tumors with extensive longitudinal spread, and combined vascular resection with reconstruction for tumors involving hepatic vascular structures, are challenging procedures with surgical indications expanded. Liver transplantation after the standardization of a neoadjuvant protocol described by the Mayo Clinic has increased the number of patients who can undergo operation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suvendu Sekhar Jena
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Liver Transplantation, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Naimish N Mehta
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Liver Transplantation, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Samiran Nundy
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Liver Transplantation, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schoch A, Lisotti A, Walter T, Fumex F, Leblanc S, Artru P, Desramé J, Brighi N, Marsot J, Souquet JC, Napoléon B. Efficacy of EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy in prolonging survival of patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Endosc Ultrasound 2022; 11:487-494. [PMID: 36537386 PMCID: PMC9921975 DOI: 10.4103/eus-d-22-00014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives The background of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) patients treated with EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS). Methods All patients with pCCA who underwent EUS-HGS from 2010 to 2020 were analyzed. The primary outcome was clinical success; the secondary outcomes were technical success, adverse events (AEs), stent patency, and oncological outcomes. Cox proportional-hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier curves were analyzed to identify variables related to survival. Results Thirty-four patients (50% females, 76 years old) were included; 24 (70.6%) presented with distant metastasis. Indications for EUS-HGS were ERCP failure (64.7%), duodenal stricture (23.5%), postsurgical anatomy (5.9%), and dilation limited to the left intrahepatic duct (5.9%). The technical success rate was 97.1%. The clinical success rate was 64.7%. Nine (26.5%) presented AEs, 2 fatal (bleeding and leakage). The overall survival was 91 (31-263) days. On multivariate analysis, EUS-HGS clinical success (Exp[b]: 0.23 [0.09-0.60]; P = 0.003) and chemotherapy (Exp[b]: 0.06 [0.02-0.23]; P < 0.001) were significantly associated with survival. The survival was longer in patients who achieved EUS-HGS clinical success (178[61-393] vs. 15[73-24] days; hazard ratio: 6.3; P < 0.001) and in those starting chemotherapy (324[178-439] vs. 31 [9-48]; hazard ratio: 1.2; P < 0.001). Conclusions EUS-HGS is effective in pCCA patients despite a not negligible AE rate. Clinical success, potentially leading to jaundice resolution and chemotherapy start, significantly improves survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Armelle Schoch
- Endoscopic Department, Jean Mermoz Private Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Endoscopic Department, Jean Mermoz Private Hospital, Lyon, France,Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Thomas Walter
- Department of Medical Oncology, Edoard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Fabien Fumex
- Endoscopic Department, Jean Mermoz Private Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Sarah Leblanc
- Endoscopic Department, Jean Mermoz Private Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Pascal Artru
- Endoscopic Department, Jean Mermoz Private Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Jérôme Desramé
- Endoscopic Department, Jean Mermoz Private Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Nicole Brighi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Institute for the Study of Cancer (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Julien Marsot
- Department of Radiology, Jean Mermoz Private Hospital, Lyon, France
| | | | - Bertrand Napoléon
- Endoscopic Department, Jean Mermoz Private Hospital, Lyon, France,Address for correspondence Dr. Bertrand Napoléon, Endoscopic Department, Jean Mermoz Private Hospital, Ramsay Sante, 55 avenue Jean Mermoz, 69008 Lyon, France. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nooijen LE, Banales JM, de Boer MT, Braconi C, Folseraas T, Forner A, Holowko W, Hoogwater FJH, Klümpen HJ, Groot Koerkamp B, Lamarca A, La Casta A, López-López F, Izquierdo-Sánchez L, Scheiter A, Utpatel K, Swijnenburg RJ, Kazemier G, Erdmann JI. Impact of Positive Lymph Nodes and Resection Margin Status on the Overall Survival of Patients with Resected Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: The ENSCCA Registry. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2389. [PMID: 35625993 PMCID: PMC9140174 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Lymph node metastasis and positive resection margins have been reported to be major determinants of overall survival (OS) and poor recurrence-free survival (RFS) for patients who underwent resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). However, the prognostic value of positive lymph nodes independently from resection margin status on OS has not been evaluated. Methods: From the European Cholangiocarcinoma (ENSCCA) registry, patients who underwent resection for pCCA between 1994 and 2021 were included in this retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome was OS stratified for resection margin and lymph node status. The secondary outcome was recurrence-free survival. Results: A total of 325 patients from 11 different centers and six European countries were included. Of these, 194 (59.7%) patients had negative resection margins. In 113 (34.8%) patients, positive lymph nodes were found. Lymph node status, histological grade, and ECOG performance status were independent prognostic factors for survival. The median OS for N0R0, N0R1, N+R0, and N+R1 was 38, 30, 18, and 12 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion: These data indicate that in the presence of positive regional lymph nodes, resection margin status does not determine OS or RFS in patients with pCCA. Achieving negative margins in patients with positive nodes should not come at the expense of more extensive surgery and associated higher mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn E. Nooijen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC—Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (L.E.N.); (G.K.)
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (H.-J.K.); (R.-J.S.)
| | - Jesus M. Banales
- Department of Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases, Biodonostia Health Research Institute, Donostia University Hospital, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 20014 San Sebastián, Spain; (J.M.B.); (L.I.-S.)
- National Institute for the Study of Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases, CIBERehd, “Instituto de Salud Carlos III” (ISCIII), 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, School of Sciences, University of Navarra, 31080 Pamplona, Spain
- Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science, 48009 Bilbao, Spain
| | - Marieke T. de Boer
- Section of HPB Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands; (M.T.d.B.); (F.J.H.H.)
| | | | - Trine Folseraas
- Norwegian PSC Research Center and Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Division of Surgery, Inflammatory Medicine and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, 0372 Oslo, Norway;
| | - Alejandro Forner
- BCLC Group, Liver Unit, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, University Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Waclaw Holowko
- Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland;
| | - Frederik J. H. Hoogwater
- Section of HPB Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands; (M.T.d.B.); (F.J.H.H.)
| | - Heinz-Josef Klümpen
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (H.-J.K.); (R.-J.S.)
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC—Location University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Angela Lamarca
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK;
| | - Adelaida La Casta
- Department of Medical Oncology, Biodonostia Health Research Institute, Donostia University Hospital, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 20014 San Sebastián, Spain;
| | - Flora López-López
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, 28041 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Laura Izquierdo-Sánchez
- Department of Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases, Biodonostia Health Research Institute, Donostia University Hospital, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 20014 San Sebastián, Spain; (J.M.B.); (L.I.-S.)
| | - Alexander Scheiter
- Institute of Pathology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (A.S.); (K.U.)
| | - Kirsten Utpatel
- Institute of Pathology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (A.S.); (K.U.)
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (H.-J.K.); (R.-J.S.)
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC—Location University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC—Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (L.E.N.); (G.K.)
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (H.-J.K.); (R.-J.S.)
| | - Joris I. Erdmann
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (H.-J.K.); (R.-J.S.)
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC—Location University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Current Perspectives on the Surgical Management of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14092208. [PMID: 35565335 PMCID: PMC9104954 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2022] [Revised: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) represents nearly 15% of all primary liver cancers and 2% of all cancer-related deaths worldwide. Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) accounts for 50-60% of all CCA. First described in 1965, pCCAs arise between the second-order bile ducts and the insertion of the cystic duct into the common bile duct. CCA typically has an insidious onset and commonly presents with advanced, unresectable disease. Complete surgical resection is technically challenging, as tumor proximity to the structures of the central liver often necessitates an extended hepatectomy to achieve negative margins. Intraoperative frozen section can aid in assuring negative margins and complete resection. Portal lymphadenectomy provides important prognostic and staging information. In specialized centers, vascular resection and reconstruction can be performed to achieve negative margins in appropriately selected patients. In addition, minimally invasive surgical techniques (e.g., robotic surgery) are safe, feasible, and provide equivalent short-term oncologic outcomes. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy followed by liver transplantation provides a potentially curative option for patients with unresectable disease. New trials are needed to investigate novel chemotherapies, immunotherapies, and targeted therapies to better control systemic disease in the adjuvant setting and, potentially, downstage disease in the neoadjuvant setting.
Collapse
|
6
|
Work-Up and Outcome of Hepatic Resection for Peri-Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma (PH-CCA) without Staging Laparoscopy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14071841. [PMID: 35406612 PMCID: PMC8997872 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary This is a single centre cohort of patients undergoing surgery for PH-CCA suggests that routine staging laparoscopy may not be necessary in the pre-operative work-up. Abstract Background: This study reports the outcome of a work-up programme for resection of peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma (PH-CCA) without the use of staging laparoscopy. Methods: This is a clinical case cohort series of patients undergoing surgical resection of PH-CCA without the use of staging laparoscopy in the work-up algorithm. During the 13 years from 1 January 2009 to 1 January 2022, 32 patients underwent laparotomy for planned surgical resection of PH-CCA. Data were collected on demographic profile, admission biochemistry, radiology, pre-operative intervention, operation and outcome, together with post-operative complications and disease-free and overall survival. Results: All patients underwent pre-operative contrast-enhanced CT. Twenty-four (75%) underwent pre-operative MR. Twenty-three (72%) underwent pre-operative biliary drainage. Twenty-nine patients (91%) had either type III or IV peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma. One patient (3%) in this series underwent a non-resectional laparotomy. Twenty-nine (91%) had a final histopathological diagnosis of PH-CCA. One further patient had a final diagnosis of an intraductal papillary neoplasm of the biliary tree (IPNB) with high-grade dysplasia but no invasive cancer. Eleven patients (36%) received chemotherapy after surgery. The median (95% CI) time to recurrence was 14 (7–31) months. The median survival was 25 (18-upper limit not reached) months. Conclusion: This cohort of 32 patients undergoing attempted resection for PH-CCA without the use of staging laparoscopy in the work-up algorithm indicates that with careful attention to patient fitness and cross-sectional and interventional radiologic/endoscopic imaging, a very low non-therapeutic laparotomy rate of 3% can be achieved and sustained.
Collapse
|
7
|
Yamada M, Mizuno T, Yamaguchi J, Yokoyama Y, Igami T, Onoe S, Watanabe N, Uehara K, Matsuo K, Ebata T. Superiority of clinical American Joint Committee on Cancer T classification for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2021; 29:768-777. [PMID: 34717042 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 09/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical tumor staging is essential information for making a therapeutic decision in cancer. This study aimed to identify the optimal tumor classification system for predicting resectability and survival probability in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. METHODS Patients who were treated for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma between 2009 and 2018 were enrolled. Local tumor extension was staged radiologically according to a diameter-based classification system in addition to the AJCC, Blumgart, and Bismuth systems. Survival and resectability were compared between T subgroups, and the discriminability of the four systems was assessed with Harrell's concordance index (C-index). RESULTS Among 702 study patients, 559 (80.0%) underwent laparotomy, 489 (70.0%) of whom underwent resection. The resectability significantly decreased for more advanced tumors in all systems (P < .001); the AJCC system had the greatest discriminability for resectability (area under the curve 0.721). Overall survival at 5 years was 69.9% for AJCC cT1, 45.8% for cT2, 31.8% for cT3, and 15.3% for cT4 tumors (cT1 vs cT2; P = .002, cT2 vs cT3; P = .008 and cT3 vs cT4; P < .001). The AJCC system had the largest C-index of 0.627. CONCLUSIONS The AJCC T system was the optimal classification system for predicting resectability and survival in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihoko Yamada
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Takashi Mizuno
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Junpei Yamaguchi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yukihiro Yokoyama
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Igami
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Onoe
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Watanabe
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Kay Uehara
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Keitaro Matsuo
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Epidemiology, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Tomoki Ebata
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van Keulen A, Franssen S, van der Geest LG, de Boer MT, Coenraad M, van Driel LMJW, Erdmann JI, Haj Mohammad N, Heij L, Klümpen H, Tjwa E, Valkenburg‐van Iersel L, Verheij J, Groot Koerkamp B, Olthof PB. Nationwide treatment and outcomes of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Liver Int 2021; 41:1945-1953. [PMID: 33641214 PMCID: PMC8359996 DOI: 10.1111/liv.14856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2020] [Revised: 02/06/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is a rare tumour that requires complex multidisciplinary management. All known data are almost exclusively derived from expert centres. This study aimed to analyse the outcomes of patients with pCCA in a nationwide cohort. METHODS Data on all patients diagnosed with pCCA in the Netherlands between 2010 and 2018 were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Data included type of hospital of diagnosis and the received treatment. Outcomes included the type of treatment and overall survival. RESULTS A total of 2031 patients were included and the median overall survival for the overall cohort was 5.2 (95% CI 4.7-5.7) months. Three-hundred-ten (15%) patients underwent surgical resection, 271 (13%) underwent palliative systemic treatment, 21 (1%) palliative local anti-cancer treatment and 1429 (70%) underwent best supportive care. These treatments resulted in a median overall survival of 29.6 (95% CI 25.2-34.0), 12.2 (95% CI 11.0-13.3), 14.5 (95%CI 8.2-20.8) and 2.9 (95% CI 2.6-3.2) months respectively. Resection rate was 13% in patients who were diagnosed in non-academic and 32% in academic centres (P < .001), which resulted in a survival difference in favour of academic centres. Median overall survival was 9.7 (95% CI 7.7-11.7) months in academic centres compared to 4.9 (95% CI 4.3-5.4) months in non-academic centres (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS In patients with pCCA, resection rate and overall survival were higher for patients who were diagnosed in academic centres. These results show population-based outcomes of pCCA and highlight the importance of regional collaboration in the treatment of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne‐Marleen van Keulen
- Department of SurgeryErasmus MC Cancer InstituteRotterdamthe Netherlands
- Department of SurgeryReinier de Graaf GasthuisDelftthe Netherlands
| | - Stijn Franssen
- Department of SurgeryErasmus MC Cancer InstituteRotterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Lydia G. van der Geest
- Department of ResearchNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL)Utrechtthe Netherlands
| | - Marieke T. de Boer
- Department of SurgeryUniversity Medical Center GroningenGroningenthe Netherlands
| | - Minneke Coenraad
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenthe Netherlands
| | | | - Joris I. Erdmann
- Department of SurgeryAmsterdam University Medical CentersUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Nadia Haj Mohammad
- Department of Medical OncologyUniversity Medical Center Utrecht/ Regional Academic Cancer Center UtrechtUtrecht UniversityUtrechtthe Netherlands
| | - Lara Heij
- Institute of PathologyUniversity Hospital RWTH AachenAachenGermany
- Visceral and Transplant SurgeryUniversity Hospital RWTH AachenAachenGermany
- NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in MetabolismMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtthe Netherlands
| | - Heinz‐Josef Klümpen
- Department of Medical OncologyAmsterdam University Medical CentersUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Eric Tjwa
- Department of GastroenterologyRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenthe Netherlands
| | - Liselot Valkenburg‐van Iersel
- Department of Internal MedicineDivision of Medical OncologyGROW‐School for Oncology and Developmental BiologyMaastricht University Medical CenterMaastrichtthe Netherlands
| | - Joanne Verheij
- Department of PathologyAmsterdam University Medical CentersUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of SurgeryErasmus MC Cancer InstituteRotterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Pim B. Olthof
- Department of SurgeryErasmus MC Cancer InstituteRotterdamthe Netherlands
- Department of SurgeryAmsterdam University Medical CentersUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nooijen LE, Swijnenburg RJ, Klümpen HJ, Verheij J, Kazemier G, van Gulik TM, Erdmann JI. Surgical Therapy for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: State of the Art. Visc Med 2021; 37:18-25. [PMID: 33708815 PMCID: PMC7923954 DOI: 10.1159/000514032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical therapy still offers the only chance of long-term survival for patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the current standards and challenges in the surgical treatment of pCCA. SUMMARY After imaging and defining resectability, the first step towards optimal surgical treatment is optimizing biliary drainage and preventing cholangitis, followed by securing adequate future liver remnant volume and/or function. The main goal of resection for pCCA is achieving radical resection and ultimately long-term survival. In order to achieve radical resection, several points will be addressed (e.g., vascular resection and reconstruction, intraoperative frozen sections, right versus left hemihepatectomy, and the usefulness of preoperative [chemo]therapy). KEY MESSAGES In order to optimize long-term outcomes for patients with pCCA, collaboration between leading centers should be increased. In addition, this collaboration is necessary to design large prospective randomized controlled trials, as the incidence of pCCA is low and the number of resectable patients is even lower. Currently, most results are based on small retrospective cohort studies resulting in low evidence. In order to properly investigate how to improve long-term survival, we need to set up trials to confirm the results of small series suggesting the positive effect of preoperative chemotherapy and extended lymph node resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn E. Nooijen
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Heinz-Josef Klümpen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joanne Verheij
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas M. van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joris I. Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dondossola D, Ghidini M, Grossi F, Rossi G, Foschi D. Practical review for diagnosis and clinical management of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26:3542-3561. [PMID: 32742125 PMCID: PMC7366054 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i25.3542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2019] [Revised: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCC) is the most aggressive malignant tumor of the biliary tract. Perihilar CCC (pCCC) is the most common CCC and is burdened by a complicated diagnostic iter and its anatomical location makes surgical approach burden by poor results. Besides its clinical presentation, a multimodal diagnostic approach should be carried on by a tertiary specialized center to avoid miss-diagnosis. Preoperative staging must consider the extent of liver resection to avoid post-surgical hepatic failure. During staging iter, magnetic resonance can obtain satisfactory cholangiographic images, while invasive techniques should be used if bile duct samples are needed. Consistently, to improve diagnostic potential, bile duct drainage is not necessary in jaundice, while it is indicated in refractory cholangitis or when liver hypertrophy is needed. Once resecability criteria are identified, the extent of liver resection is secondary to the longitudinal spread of CCC. While in the past type IV pCCC was not considered resectable, some authors reported good results after their treatment. Conversely, in selected unresectable cases, liver transplantation could be a valuable option. Adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care for resected patients, while neoadjuvant approach has growing evidences. If curative resection is not achieved, radiotherapy can be added to chemotherapy. This multistep curative iter must be carried on in specialized centers. Hence, the aim of this review is to highlight the main steps and pitfalls of the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to pCCC with a peculiar attention to type IV pCCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Dondossola
- General and Liver Transplant Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan 20122, Italy
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi of Milan, Milan 20122, Italy
| | - Michele Ghidini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan 20122, Italy
| | - Francesco Grossi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan 20122, Italy
| | - Giorgio Rossi
- General and Liver Transplant Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan 20122, Italy
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi of Milan, Milan 20122, Italy
| | - Diego Foschi
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "Luigi Sacco", L. Sacco Hospital, Università degli Studi of Milan, Milan 20157, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Franken LC, Coelen RJS, Roos E, Verheij J, Phoa SS, Besselink MG, Busch ORC, van Gulik TM. Staging Laparoscopy in Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Is It Still Useful? Visc Med 2020; 36:501-505. [PMID: 33442552 DOI: 10.1159/000506297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2019] [Accepted: 01/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The role of staging laparoscopy in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma remains unclear. Despite extensive preoperative imaging, approximately 25% of patients are deemed unresectable at laparotomy due to metastasized disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of unresectable disease found at staging laparoscopy and to identify predictors for detecting metastasized intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Methods We retrospectively collected records of all patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, presenting at our institution from 2008 to 2017. Staging laparoscopy was performed on the suspicion of distant metastases and on indication in larger tumors. The yield and sensitivity of staging laparoscopy was calculated. Reasons for unresectability at staging laparoscopy or laparotomy were recorded. Results Among a total of 80 patients with potentially resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 35 patients underwent staging laparoscopy on the suspicion of distant metastases. Unresectable disease was found at staging laparoscopy in 15 patients. Reasons for unresectability were liver metastasis (n = 6), peritoneal metastasis (n = 4), severe cirrhosis (n = 2), locally advanced tumor with satellite lesions (n = 1), and distant lymph node metastasis (n = 2). Considering optimal preoperative imaging, the true yield of staging laparoscopy was 20% (7/35). Two patients did not undergo laparotomy due to progression after staging laparoscopy. Of the remaining 18 patients who underwent laparotomy, 6 patients (30%) had unresectable disease, mostly because of distant metastasis (n = 4). Conclusions The role of staging laparoscopy to detect unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is highly dependent on the quality of preoperative imaging. Currently, no accurate selection criteria on imaging exist to select patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who potentially benefit from staging laparoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lotte C Franken
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Jan S Coelen
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eva Roos
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joanne Verheij
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Saffire S Phoa
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier R C Busch
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas M van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Roos E, Strijker M, Franken LC, Busch OR, van Hooft JE, Klümpen HJ, van Laarhoven HW, Wilmink JW, Verheij J, van Gulik TM, Besselink MG. Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes between anatomical subtypes of resected biliary tract cancer in a Western high-volume center. HPB (Oxford) 2020; 22:405-414. [PMID: 31494056 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2019] [Revised: 05/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Outcomes for the four anatomical subtypes of biliary tract carcinoma (BTC) - intrahepatic, perihilar and distal cholangiocarcinoma (ICC, PHCC, DCC) and gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) - are often combined. However, large cohorts comparing short- and long-term outcomes for the anatomical subtypes of BTC are lacking. METHODS All patients who underwent resection for pathology proven ICC, PHCC, DCC or GBC (2000-2016) from a single Western high-volume center were retrospectively selected. Clinicopathological characteristics, short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the four anatomical subtypes. RESULTS Overall, 361 patients with resected BTC were included (33 ICC, 135 PHCC, 148 DCC, 45 GBC). Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher complications were 48%, 51%, 36% and 8% (p < 0.001) and 90-day mortality was 9%, 15%, 3%, 4% (p < 0.001), for ICC, PHCC, DCC, GBC. Median overall survival was 37, 42, 29 and 41 months (p = 0.722), for ICC, PHCC, DCC, GBC. Five-year survival ranged between 29% and 37%. Anatomical subtype was not an independent predictor for overall survival. CONCLUSION In this large single-center cohort of resected BTC, major morbidity and 90-day mortality varied between the four anatomical subtypes of BTC, mainly due to differences in surgical approach However, a significant difference in overall survival was not detected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Roos
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Marin Strijker
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lotte C Franken
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Heinz-Josef Klümpen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna W Wilmink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joanne Verheij
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas M van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
|
14
|
Gaspersz MP, Buettner S, Roos E, van Vugt JLA, Coelen RJS, Vugts J, Wiggers JK, Allen PJ, Besselink MG, Busch ORC, Belt EJ, D'Angelica MI, DeMatteo RP, de Jonge J, Kingham TP, Polak WG, Willemssen FEJA, van Gulik TM, Jarnagin WR, Ijzermans JNM, Groot Koerkamp B. A preoperative prognostic model to predict surgical success in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2018; 118:469-476. [PMID: 30132904 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2018] [Accepted: 06/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) on imaging have a substantial risk of metastatic or locally advanced disease, incomplete (R1) resection, and 90-day mortality. Our aim was to develop a preoperative prognostic model to predict surgical success, defined as a complete (R0) resection without 90-day mortality, in patients with resectable PHC on imaging. STUDY DESIGN Patients with PHC who underwent exploratory laparotomy in three tertiary referral centers were identified. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify preoperatively available prognostic factors. A prognostic model was developed using data from two European centers and validated in one American center. RESULTS In total, 671 patients with PHC underwent exploratory laparotomy. In the derivation cohort, surgical success was achieved in 102 of 331 patients (30.8%). No resection was performed in 176 patients (53.2%) because of metastatic or locally advanced disease. Of the 155 patients (46.8%) who underwent a resection, 38 (24.5%) had an R1-resection. Of the remaining 117 (35.3%), 15 (12.8%) had 90-day mortality. Independent poor prognostic factors for surgical success were identified, and a preoperative prognostic model was developed with a concordance index of 0.71. External validation showed good concordance (0.70). CONCLUSION Surgical success was achieved in only 30% of patients with PHC undergoing exploratory laparotomy and could be predicted by age, cholangitis, hepatic artery involvement, lymph node metastases, and Blumgart stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcia P Gaspersz
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Buettner
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eva Roos
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen L A van Vugt
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J S Coelen
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jaynee Vugts
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jimme K Wiggers
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter J Allen
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier R C Busch
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eric J Belt
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ronald P DeMatteo
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jeroen de Jonge
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T Peter Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wojciech G Polak
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - François E J A Willemssen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas M van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - William R Jarnagin
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan N M Ijzermans
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Coelen RJS, Roos E, Wiggers JK, Besselink MG, Buis CI, Busch ORC, Dejong CHC, van Delden OM, van Eijck CHJ, Fockens P, Gouma DJ, Koerkamp BG, de Haan MW, van Hooft JE, IJzermans JNM, Kater GM, Koornstra JJ, van Lienden KP, Moelker A, Damink SWMO, Poley JW, Porte RJ, de Ridder RJ, Verheij J, van Woerden V, Rauws EAJ, Dijkgraaf MGW, van Gulik TM. Endoscopic versus percutaneous biliary drainage in patients with resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 3:681-690. [PMID: 30122355 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(18)30234-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2018] [Revised: 06/29/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, biliary drainage is recommended to treat obstructive jaundice and optimise the clinical condition before liver resection. Little evidence exists on the preferred initial method of biliary drainage. We therefore investigated the incidence of severe drainage-related complications of endoscopic biliary drainage or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with potentially resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. METHODS We did a multicentre, randomised controlled trial at four academic centres in the Netherlands. Patients who were aged at least 18 years with potentially resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma requiring major liver resection, and biliary obstruction of the future liver remnant (defined as a bilirubin concentration of >50 μmol/L [2·9 mg/dL]), were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive endoscopic biliary drainage or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage through the use of computer-generated allocation. Randomisation, done by the trial coordinator, was stratified for previous (attempted) biliary drainage, the extent of bile duct involvement, and enrolling centre. Patients were enrolled by clinicians of the participating centres. The primary outcome was the number of severe complications between randomisation and surgery in the intention-to-treat population. The trial was registered at the Netherlands National Trial Register, number NTR4243. FINDINGS From Sept 26, 2013, to April 29, 2016, 261 patients were screened for participation, and 54 eligible patients were randomly assigned to endoscopic biliary drainage (n=27) or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (n=27). The study was prematurely closed because of higher mortality in the percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage group (11 [41%] of 27 patients) than in the endoscopic biliary drainage group (three [11%] of 27 patients; relative risk 3·67, 95% CI 1·15-11·69; p=0·03). Three of the 11 deaths among patients in the percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage group occurred before surgery. The proportion of patients with severe preoperative drainage-related complications was similar between the groups (17 [63%] patients in the percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage group vs 18 [67%] in the endoscopic biliary drainage group; relative risk 0·94, 95% CI 0·64-1·40). 16 (59%) patients in the percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage group and ten (37%) patients in the endoscopic biliary drainage group developed preoperative cholangitis (p=0·1). 15 (56%) patients required additional percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage after endoscopic biliary drainage, whereas only one (4%) patient required endoscopic biliary drainage after percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. INTERPRETATION The study was prematurely stopped because of higher all-cause mortality in the percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage group. Post-drainage complications were similar between groups, but the data should be interpreted with caution because of the small sample size. The results call for further prospective studies and reconsideration of indications and strategy towards biliary drainage in this complex disease. FUNDING Dutch Cancer Foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J S Coelen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Eva Roos
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jimme K Wiggers
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Carlijn I Buis
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Olivier R C Busch
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Cornelis H C Dejong
- Department of Surgery and School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Otto M van Delden
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Casper H J van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Paul Fockens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Gouma
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Michiel W de Haan
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jan N M IJzermans
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - G Matthijs Kater
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Jan J Koornstra
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Krijn P van Lienden
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Adriaan Moelker
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Steven W M Olde Damink
- Department of Surgery and School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Jan-Werner Poley
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Robert J Porte
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Rogier J de Ridder
- Department of Gastroenterology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Joanne Verheij
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Victor van Woerden
- Department of Surgery and School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Erik A J Rauws
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marcel G W Dijkgraaf
- Clinical Research Unit and Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Thomas M van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wiggers JK, Groot Koerkamp B, van Klaveren D, Coelen RJ, Nio CY, Allen PJ, Besselink MG, Busch OR, D'Angelica MI, DeMatteo RP, Kingham TP, van Gulik TM, Jarnagin WR. Preoperative Risk Score to Predict Occult Metastatic or Locally Advanced Disease in Patients with Resectable Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma on Imaging. J Am Coll Surg 2018; 227:238-246.e2. [PMID: 29627334 PMCID: PMC6089225 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.03.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2017] [Revised: 03/20/2018] [Accepted: 03/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many patients with resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) on imaging are diagnosed intraoperatively with occult metastatic or locally advanced disease, precluding a curative-intent resection. This study aimed to develop and validate a preoperative risk score. STUDY DESIGN Patients with resectable PHC on imaging who underwent operations in 2 high-volume centers (US and Europe) between 2000 and 2015 were included. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to develop the risk score. Cross-validation was used to validate the score, alternating the 2 centers as "training" and "testing" datasets. RESULTS Of 566 patients who underwent operations, 309 (55%) patients had a resection, and in 257 (45%) patients, a curative-intent resection was precluded due to distant metastasis (n = 151 [27%]) or locally advanced disease (n = 106 [19%]). Preoperative predictors included bilirubin >2 mg/dL, bile duct involvement on imaging, portal vein involvement on imaging (≥180 degrees), hepatic artery involvement on imaging (≥180 degrees), and suspicious lymph nodes on imaging. The new risk score (c-index 0.75 after cross-validation) provided significantly more accurate predictions than the Bismuth classification (c-index 0.62), Blumgart T-staging (c-index 0.67), and cTNM staging (c-index 0.68). The new risk score identified 4 risk groups for occult metastatic or locally advanced disease: low (14.7%), intermediate (29.5%), high (47.3%), and very high risk (81.3%). The preoperative score groups also predicted survival after operation, irrespective of intraoperative findings (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The validated risk score can predict occult distant metastatic or locally advanced PHC based on 5 preoperatively available factors. The score can be useful in preoperative shared decision making and selection of patients in neoadjuvant clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jimme K Wiggers
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - David van Klaveren
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J Coelen
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Yung Nio
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter J Allen
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ronald P DeMatteo
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - T Peter Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Thomas M van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - William R Jarnagin
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Quinn LM, Dunne DFJ, Jones RP, Poston GJ, Malik HZ, Fenwick SW. Optimal perioperative care in peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma resection. Eur Surg 2018; 50:93-99. [PMID: 29875797 PMCID: PMC5968056 DOI: 10.1007/s10353-018-0529-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2018] [Accepted: 04/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Surgical resection remains the only proven curative treatment for peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Despite recent advances in liver surgery techniques and perioperative care, resection for peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma remains associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Considerable variation in the perioperative management of these patients exists. Optimal perioperative management has the potential to deliver improved outcomes. This article seeks to summarize the evidence underpinning best practice in the perioperative care of patients undergoing resection of peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma. The authors also seek to identify areas where research efforts and future clinical trials should be targeted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonard M. Quinn
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, L9 7AL Liverpool, UK
- Institute of translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Ashton Street, L69 3GE Liverpool, UK
| | - Declan F. J. Dunne
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, L9 7AL Liverpool, UK
| | - Robert P. Jones
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, L9 7AL Liverpool, UK
| | - Graeme J. Poston
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, L9 7AL Liverpool, UK
| | - Hassan Z. Malik
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, L9 7AL Liverpool, UK
| | - Stephen W. Fenwick
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, L9 7AL Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rassam F, Roos E, van Lienden KP, van Hooft JE, Klümpen HJ, van Tienhoven G, Bennink RJ, Engelbrecht MR, Schoorlemmer A, Beuers UHW, Verheij J, Besselink MG, Busch OR, van Gulik TM. Modern work-up and extended resection in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: the AMC experience. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2018; 403:289-307. [PMID: 29350267 PMCID: PMC5986829 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-018-1649-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2017] [Accepted: 09/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
AIM Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is a challenging disease and requires aggressive surgical treatment in order to achieve curation. The assessment and work-up of patients with presumed PHC is multidisciplinary, complex and requires extensive experience. The aim of this paper is to review current aspects of diagnosis, preoperative work-up and extended resection in patients with PHC from the perspective of our own institutional experience with this complex tumor. METHODS We provided a review of applied modalities in the diagnosis and work-up of PHC according to current literature. All patients with presumed PHC in our center between 2000 and 2016 were identified and described. The types of resection, surgical techniques and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION Upcoming diagnostic modalities such as Spyglass and combinations of serum biomarkers and molecular markers have potential to decrease the rate of misdiagnosis of benign, inflammatory disease. Assessment of liver function with hepatobiliary scintigraphy provides better information on the future remnant liver (FRL) than volume alone. The selective use of staging laparoscopy is advisable to avoid futile laparotomies. In patients requiring extended resection, selective preoperative biliary drainage is mandatory in cholangitis and when FRL is small (< 50%). Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) is used when FRL volume is less than 40% and optionally includes the left portal vein branches to segment 4. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) as alternative to PVE is not recommended in PHC. N2 positive lymph nodes preclude long-term survival. The benefit of unconditional en bloc resection of the portal vein bifurcation is uncertain. Along these lines, an aggressive surgical approach encompassing extended liver resection including segment 1, regional lymphadenectomy and conditional portal venous resection translates into favorable long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Rassam
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - E Roos
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K P van Lienden
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology and Tytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H J Klümpen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G van Tienhoven
- Department of Radiotherapy, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R J Bennink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M R Engelbrecht
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Schoorlemmer
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - U H W Beuers
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology and Tytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Verheij
- Department of Pathology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - O R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T M van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|