Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia and Classic Lobular Carcinoma In Situ Can Be Safely Managed Without Surgical Excision

Atypical ductal or lobular hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in-situ, flat epithelial atypia, and future risk of developing breast cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Biopsy-proven breast lesions such as atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) or atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH), lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) and flat epithelial atypia (FEA) increase subsequent risk of breast cancer (BC), but long-term risk has not been synthesized. A systematic review was conducted to quantify future risk of breast cancer accounting for time since diagnosis of these high-risk lesions.

METHODS

A systematic search of literature from 2000 was performed to identify studies reporting BC as an outcome following core-needle or excision biopsy histology diagnosis of ADH, ALH, LCIS, lobular neoplasia (LN) or FEA. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate cumulative BC incidence at five-yearly intervals following initial diagnosis for each histology type.

RESULTS

Seventy studies reporting on 47,671 subjects met eligibility criteria. BC incidence at five years post-diagnosis with a high-risk lesion was estimated to be 9.3 % (95 % CI 6.9-12.5 %) for LCIS, 6.6 % (95 % CI 4.4-9.7 %) for ADH, 9.7 % (95 % CI 5.3-17.2 %) for ALH, 8.6 % (95 % CI 6.5-11.4 %) for LN, and 3.8 % (95 % CI 1.2-11.7 %) for FEA. At ten years post-diagnosis, BC incidence was estimated to be 11.8 % (95 % CI 9.0-15.3 %) for LCIS, 13.9 % (95 % CI 7.8-23.6 %) for ADH, 15.4 % (95 % CI 7.2-29.3 %) for ALH, 17.0 % (95 % CI 7.2-35.3 %) for LN and 7.2 % (95 % CI 2.2-21.2 %) for FEA.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate increased BC risk sustained over time since initial diagnosis of high-risk breast lesions, varying by lesion type, with relatively less evidence for FEA.

The Challenges of Lobular Carcinomas from a Surgeon's Point of View

Invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) presents unique challenges and considerations in the realm of surgical management. Characterized by its distinct histological features, including the loss of E-cadherin expression and dys-cohesive growth pattern, ILC often poses diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas for clinicians. This abstract explores the surgical landscape of ILC, focusing on its epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic modalities, and surgical interventions. Emphasizing the importance of individualized treatment strategies, this narrative delves into the nuances of surgical decision-making, including the role of breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy, axillary staging, and the significance of margin status. Additionally, advancements in surgical techniques, such as oncoplastic approaches and sentinel lymph node biopsy, are examined in the context of optimizing oncologic outcomes and preserving cosmesis. Through a comprehensive review of current literature and clinical guidelines, this overview aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the surgical considerations inherent to the management of invasive lobular breast cancer.

Updates in the Surgical Management of Benign and High-Risk Breast Lesions

Benign breast disease (BBD) is a heterogenous group of lesions often classified as nonproliferative or proliferative, with the latter group further categorized based on the presence of atypia. Although nonproliferative lesions are more common, the risk of breast cancer is elevated in women with proliferative lesions. Historically, the majority of proliferative lesions were excised due to concern for future and/or concomitant breast cancer at the site of the index lesion. However, contemporary data suggest that the risk of cancer associated with various proliferative lesions may be lower than previously thought, and management of BBD has become more nuanced. In this review, we will focus on recent updates in the management of a select group of benign and high-risk lesions.

Upgrade Rates and Breast Cancer Development Among Germline Pathogenic Variant Carriers with High-Risk Breast Lesions

BACKGROUND

High-risk lesions (HRL) of the breast are risk factors for future breast cancer development and may be associated with a concurrent underlying malignancy when identified on needle biopsy; however, there are few data evaluating HRLs in carriers of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in breast cancer predisposition genes.

METHODS

We identified patients from two institutions with germline PVs in high- and moderate-penetrance breast cancer predisposition genes and an HRL in an intact breast, including atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), flat epithelial atypia (FEA), and lobular neoplasia (LN). We calculated upgrade rates at surgical excision and used Kaplan-Meier methods to characterize 3-year breast cancer risk in patients without upgrade.

RESULTS

Of 117 lesions in 105 patients, 65 (55.6%) were ADH, 48 (41.0%) were LN, and 4 (3.4%) were FEA. Most PVs (83.8%) were in the BRCA1/2, CHEK2 and ATM genes. ADH and FEA were excised in most cases (87.1%), with upgrade rates of 11.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.5-23.4%) and 0%, respectively. LN was selectively excised (53.8%); upgrade rate in the excision group was 4.8% (95% CI 0.8-22.7%), and with 20 months of median follow-up, no same-site cancers developed in the observation group. Among those not upgraded, the 3-year risk of breast cancer development was 13.1% (95% CI 6.3-26.3%), mostly estrogen receptor-positive (ER +) disease (89.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Upgrade rates for HRLs in patients with PVs in breast cancer predisposition genes appear similar to non-carriers. HRLs may be associated with increased short-term ER+ breast cancer risk in PV carriers, warranting strong consideration of surgical or chemoprevention therapies in this population.

Upgrade Rates of Variant Lobular Carcinoma In Situ Compared to Classic Lobular Carcinoma In Situ Diagnosed in Core Needle Biopsies: A 10-Year Single Institution Retrospective Study

The primary aim of this study was to determine the upgrade rates of variant lobular carcinoma in situ (V-LCIS, ie, combined florid [F-LCIS] and pleomorphic [P-LCIS]) compared with classic LCIS (C-LCIS) when diagnosed on core needle biopsy (CNB). The secondary goal was to determine the rate of progression/development of invasive carcinoma on long-term follow-up after primary excision. After institutional review board approval, our institutional pathology database was searched for patients with "pure" LCIS diagnosed on CNB who underwent subsequent excision. Radiologic findings were reviewed, radiologic-pathologic (rad-path) correlation was performed, and follow-up patient outcome data were obtained. One hundred twenty cases of LCIS were identified on CNB (C-LCIS = 97, F-LCIS = 18, and P-LCIS = 5). Overall upgrade rates after excision for C-LCIS, F-LCIS, and P-LCIS were 14% (14/97), 44% (8/18), and 40% (2/5), respectively. Of the total cases, 79 (66%) were deemed rad-path concordant. Of these, the upgrade rate after excision for C-LCIS, F-LCIS, and P-LCIS was 7.5% (5 of 66), 40% (4 of 10), and 0% (0 of 3), respectively. The overall upgrade rate for V-LCIS was higher than for C-LCIS (P = .004), even for the cases deemed rad-path concordant (P value: .036). Most upgraded cases (23 of 24) showed pT1a disease or lower. With an average follow-up of 83 months, invasive carcinoma in the ipsilateral breast was identified in 8/120 (7%) cases. Six patients had died: 2 of (contralateral) breast cancer and 4 of other causes. Because of a high upgrade rate, V-LCIS diagnosed on CNB should always be excised. The upgrade rate for C-LCIS (even when rad-path concordant) is higher than reported in many other studies. Rad-path concordance read, surgical consultation, and individualized decision making are recommended for C-LCIS cases. The risk of developing invasive carcinoma after LCIS diagnosis is small (7% with ∼7-year follow-up), but active surveillance is required to diagnose early-stage disease.

Management of screening-detected lobular neoplasia in the era of digital breast tomosynthesis: A preliminary study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to determine upgrade rates of lobular neoplasia detected by screening digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and to determine imaging and clinicopathological features that may influence risk of upgrade.

METHODS

Medical records were reviewed of consecutive women who presented with screening DBT-detected atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) and/or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) from January 1, 2013, to June 30, 2020. Included patients underwent needle biopsy and had surgery or at least two-year imaging follow-up. Imaging and clinicopathological features were compared between upgraded and nonupgraded cases of lobular neoplasia using the Pearson's chi-squared test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

During the study period, 107 women (mean age 55 years, range 40-88 years) with 110 cases of ALH and/or LCIS underwent surgery (80.9%, n = 89) or at least two-year imaging follow-up (19.1%, n = 21). The overall upgrade rate to cancer was 5.5% (6/110), and the upgrade rate to invasive cancer was 3.6% (4/110). The upgrade rate of ALH to cancer was 4.1% (3/74), whereas the upgrade rate of LCIS to cancer was 9.4% (3/32) (p = .28). The upgrade rate of cases presenting as calcifications was 4.2% (3/71), whereas the upgrade rates of cases presenting as noncalcified findings was 7.7% (3/39) (p = .44).

CONCLUSIONS

The upgrade rate of screening DBT-detected lobular neoplasia is less than 6%. Surveillance rather than surgery can be considered for lobular neoplasia, particularly in patients with ALH and in those with screening-detected calcifications leading to the diagnosis.

High-Risk Lesion Management

High-risk lesions or lesions of uncertain malignant potential are frequent findings on image-guided needle biopsy of the breast and comprise a number of distinct entities. These lesions are known for having risk of underlying malignancy and are usually associated with an increased lifetime risk for breast cancer. Surgical excision was traditionally recommended for all high-risk lesions but recent studies have demonstrated that vacuum-assisted excision or surveillance may be adequate for some lesions. While management of high-risk lesion varies among institutions, this chapter describes the management recommendations based on recent literature of the most frequent types of lesions.

Management of Lobular Neoplasia Diagnosed by Core Biopsy

Lobular neoplasia (LN) involves proliferative changes within the breast lobules. LN is divided into lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) and atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH). LCIS can be further subdivided into three subtypes: classic LCIS, pleomorphic LCIS, and LCIS with necrosis (florid type). Because classic LCIS is now considered as a benign etiology, current guidelines recommend close follow-up with imaging versus surgical excision. The goal of our study was to determine if the diagnosis of classic LN on core needle biopsy (CNB) merits surgical excision. This is a retrospective, observational study conducted at Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, MA, from May 17, 2017, through June 30, 2020. We reviewed the data of breast biopsies conducted at our hospital over this period and included patients who were diagnosed with classic LN (LCIS and/or ALH) and excluded patients having any other atypical lesions on CNB. All known cancer patients were excluded. Of the 2707 CNBs performed during the study period, we identified 68 women who were diagnosed with ALH or LCIS on CNB. CNB was performed for an abnormal mammogram in the majority of patients (60; 88%) while 7(10.3%) had an abnormal breast magnetic resonance imaging study (MRI), and 1 had an abnormal ultrasound (US). A total of 58 patients (85%) underwent excisional biopsy, of which 3 (5.2%) showed malignancy, including 2 cases of DCIS and 1 invasive carcinoma. In addition, there was 1 case (1.7%) with pleomorphic LCIS and 11 cases with ADH (15.5%). The management of LN found on core biopsy is evolving, with some advocating surgical excision and others recommending observation. Our data show a change in diagnosis with excisional biopsy in 13 (22.4%) of patients with 2 cases of DCIS, 1 invasive carcinoma, 1 pleomorphic LCIS, and 9 cases of ADH, diagnosed on excisional biopsy. While ALH and classic LCIS are considered benign, the choice of ongoing surveillance versus excisional biopsy should be made with shared decision making with the patient, with consideration of personal and family history, as well as patient preferences.

The morphologic spectrum of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) observations on clinical significance, management implications and diagnostic pitfalls of classic, florid and pleomorphic LCIS

Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is a non-invasive proliferation of atypical dyscohesive epithelial cells characterized by loss or functional alteration of E-cadherin-mediated cell adhesion. The morphologic spectrum of LCIS encompasses classic (C-LCIS), florid (F-LCIS) and pleomorphic LCIS (P-LCIS), as recently defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) Expert Consensus Group. Atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) is also part of this spectrum.This article highlights the morphologic and immunohistochemical features of the three forms of LCIS and summarizes their management implications and prognosis, with emphasis on F-LCIS and P-LCIS.

High-risk and selected benign breast lesions diagnosed on core needle biopsy: Evidence for and against immediate surgical excision

The vast majority of image-detected breast abnormalities are diagnosed by percutaneous core needle biopsy (CNB) in contemporary practice. For frankly malignant lesions diagnosed by CNB, the standard practice of excision and multimodality therapy have been well-defined. However, for high-risk and selected benign lesions diagnosed by CNB, there is less consensus on optimal patient management and the need for immediate surgical excision. Here we outline the arguments for and against the practice of routine surgical excision of commonly encountered high-risk and selected benign breast lesions diagnosed by CNB. The entities reviewed include atypical ductal hyperplasia, atypical lobular hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ, intraductal papillomas, and radial scars. The data in the peer-reviewed literature confirm the benefits of a patient-centered, multidisciplinary approach that moves away from the reflexive "yes" or "no" for routine excision for a given pathologic diagnosis.

Presence of Non-classic LCIS Is Not a Contraindication to Breast Conservation in Patients with Concomitant Invasive Breast Cancer or DCIS

BACKGROUND

Non-classic lobular carcinoma in situ (NC-LCIS) represents a spectrum of lesions, histologically distinct from classic LCIS (C-LCIS) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Several studies have reported on the safety of breast conservation (BCS) in patients with DCIS or invasive breast cancer and concomitant C-LCIS, yet there are no data addressing this question for patients with concomitant NC-LCIS. We evaluated local recurrence (LR) after BCS in patients with DCIS or invasive cancer and concomitant NC-LCIS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We searched institutional databases using natural language processing to identify patients with DCIS or invasive breast cancer and concomitant NC-LCIS treated with BCS between 2000 and 2015. Charts were reviewed to collect demographics, disease and treatment details, and recurrence events. All results represent descriptive analyses.

RESULTS

We identified 71 patients with DCIS (n = 13) or invasive cancer (n = 58) and concomitant NC-LCIS treated with BCS. Median patient age was 59 years (33-77 years), and median invasive tumor size was 1.2 cm (0.1-6.9 cm); 62% of DCIS and 79% of invasive cancer patients had hormone receptor (HR)-positive disease. Among DCIS patients, seven (54%) received radiation and none hormonal therapy. Among those with invasive cancer, 52 (90%) received radiation, 17 (29%) received chemotherapy and 44 of 55 with HR-positive disease (78%) received hormonal therapy. At median follow-up of 79 months (1-265 months), the LR rate was 8% and 2% among patients with DCIS and invasive cancer, respectively.

CONCLUSION

NC-LCIS is rarely present in association with DCIS or invasive cancer, and it does not appear to impact LR outcomes following BCS.