Effects of aprindine on electrophysiological properties of the atrial muscle in man

Effects of intravenous nifekalant, a class III antiarrhythmic drug, on atrial vulnerability parameters in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Nifekalant, a class III antiarrhythmic drug, has been shown to suppress ventricular tachyarrhythmias, but its effects on AF are unclear. The aim of this study was to clarify the effects of nifekalant on the atrial vulnerability parameters in patients with paroxysmal AF. The study included 18 patients with paroxysmal AF who underwent electrophysiological study before and after intravenous infusion of nifekalant. The atrial electrophysiological parameters including the atrial effective refractory period (AERP), maximum intraatrial conduction delay, and wavelength index, calculated as the ratio of AERP to the maximum conduction delay, were quantitatively measured at baseline and during nifekalant infusion. The mean AERP was significantly prolonged from 214 +/- 27 ms at baseline to 242 +/- 39 ms after nifekalant (P < 0.001). Although earlier studies have shown that nifekalant does not affect the atrial conduction time, the mean maximum conduction delay of the study patients was significantly prolonged from 59 +/- 19 ms at baseline to 72 +/- 28 ms after nifekalant (P = 0.015). There was no significant difference in the wavelength index at baseline (4.1 +/- 1.7) and after nifekalant (4.1 +/- 2.5). However, when the differences of AERP and wavelength index were defined as each parameter during nifekalant infusion minus that at baseline, the difference of AERP showed a direct positive correlation with that of the wavelength index (P = 0.013). In conclusion, nifekalant may be effective in the prevention of AF due to prolongation of the AERP. However, in those patients who have a lesser degree of prolongation of the AERP by nifekalant, the wavelength index tended to be decreased, suggesting that the drug might augment the propensity for AF.

Double-blind placebo-controlled trial of aprindine and digoxin for the prevention of symptomatic atrial fibrillation

A multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind trial compared the preventive effect of aprindine and digoxin on the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) with placebo, and also compare the effectiveness of these 2 drugs in the prevention of AF. Patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF who had converted to sinus rhythm (SR) were randomly assigned aprindine (40 mg/day), digoxin (0.25 mg/day) or placebo and followed up on an outpatient basis every 2 weeks for 6 months. Of the 141 patients from 36 participating centers, 47 were given aprindine, 47 digoxin, and 47 were on placebo. After the 6-month follow-up, the Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage of patients remaining free of recurrent symptomatic AF on aprindine, digoxin and placebo were 33.3%, 29.2% and 21.5%, respectively. In patients remaining in SR for 15 days after from the start of follow-up, freedom from recurrence was significantly more prevalent in the aprindine group than in the placebo group (p=0.0414), but there was no significant difference between the digoxin and placebo groups. The rate of adverse events was similar in the 3 groups. In conclusion, neither aprindine nor digoxin had a significant effect on preventing relapse of symptomatic AF; however, recurrence of AF occurred later with aprindine than with placebo or digoxin.

Electrophysiologic effects of a class I antiarrhythmic agent, cibenzoline, on the refractoriness and conduction of the human atrium in vivo

We investigated the effects of a class I antiarrhythmic drug, cibenzoline, on human atrial muscle in vivo. Electrophysiologic measurements were performed in 44 patients (mean age 49 +/- 15 years), before and after an intravenous infusion of cibenzoline 1.4 mg/kg in 5 min. Extrastimuli at a basic cycle length (BCL) of 500 ms were delivered from the right atrial appendage. The effective refractory period of the right atrium (ERP-A), the conduction time from the high right atrium to the coronary sinus, maximum conduction delay (Max. CD), repetitive atrial firing zone (RAFZ), fragmented atrial activity zone (FAAZ), and conduction delay zone (CDZ) were measured. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether repetitive atrial firing (RAF) was induced (group A, n = 18) or not (group B, n = 26). Cibenzoline increased ERP-A from 198 +/- 25 to 214 +/- 26 ms (p < 0.05) and decreased Max. CD from 55 +/- 23 to 43 +/- 19 ms (p < 0.05). There were significant decreases in the RAFZ (10 +/- 17 to 4 +/- 10 ms, p < 0.05), the FAAZ (20 +/- 25 to 12 +/- 18, ms p < 0.05), and the CDZ (41 +/- 21 to 32 +/- 19 ms, p < 0.05). Cibenzoline significantly increased ERP.A (186 +/- 25 to 212 +/- 26 ms, p < 0.05) in group A, but not in group B. There were significant decreases in the RAFZ [25 +/- 19 to 9 +/- 15 ms (p < 0.05) and FAAZ 22 +/- 29 to 11 +/- 21 ms, (p < 0.05)] in group A, but not in group B. The results suggest that cibenzoline can suppress paroxysmal atrial fibrillation by prolongation of ERP-A and may also have preferential effects on the substrate of atrial fibrillation and RAF.