1
|
Beddok A, Calugaru V, de Marzi L, Graff P, Dumas JL, Goudjil F, Dendale R, Minsat M, Verrelle P, Buvat I, Créhange G. Clinical and technical challenges of cancer reirradiation: Words of wisdom. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2022; 174:103655. [PMID: 35398521 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Since the development of new radiotherapy techniques that have improved healthy tissue sparing, reirradiation (reRT) has become possible. The selection of patients eligible for reRT is complex given that it can induce severe or even fatal side effects. The first step should therefore be to assess, in the context of multidisciplinary staff meeting, the patient's physical status, the presence of sequelae resulting from the first irradiation and the best treatment option available. ReRT can be performed either curatively or palliatively to treat a cancer-related symptom that is detrimental to the patient's quality of life. The selected techniques for reRT should provide the best protection of healthy tissue. The construction of target volumes and the evaluation of constraints regarding the doses that can be used in this context have not yet been fully codified. These points raised in the literature suggest that randomized studies should be undertaken to answer pending questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud Beddok
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Université Paris Saclay/Inserm/Institut Curie. Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France.
| | - Valentin Calugaru
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| | - Ludovic de Marzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Université Paris Saclay/Inserm/Institut Curie. Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| | - Pierre Graff
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France
| | - Jean-Luc Dumas
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France
| | - Farid Goudjil
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| | - Rémi Dendale
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| | - Mathieu Minsat
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France
| | - Pierre Verrelle
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France
| | - Irène Buvat
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Université Paris Saclay/Inserm/Institut Curie. Orsay. France
| | - Gilles Créhange
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Université Paris Saclay/Inserm/Institut Curie. Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yamazaki H, Masui K, Suzuki G, Yoshida K, Nakamura S, Isohashi F, Kotsuma T, Takaoka Y, Tanaka E, Akiyama H, Ishibashi N. Reirradiation for recurrent head and neck carcinoma using high-dose-rate brachytherapy: A multi-institutional study. Brachytherapy 2022; 21:341-346. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
|
3
|
Yamazaki H, Suzuki G, Aibe N, Nakamura S, Yoshida K, Oh R. A surveillance study of patterns of reirradiation practice using external beam radiotherapy in Japan. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2021; 62:285-293. [PMID: 33341887 PMCID: PMC7948832 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rraa112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Revised: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/07/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to survey the present status and patterns of reirradiation (Re-RT) practice using external beam radiotherapy in Japan. We distributed an e-mail questionnaire to the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology partner institutions, which consisted of part 1 (number of Re-RT cases in 2008-2012 and 2013-2018) and part 2 (indications and treatment planning for Re-RT and eight case scenarios). Of the 85 institutions that replied to part 1, 75 (88%) performed Re-RTs. However, 59 of these 75 institutions (79%) reported difficulty in obtaining Re-RT case information from their databases. The responses from 37 institutions included the number of Re-RT cases, which totaled 508 in the period from 2009 to 2013 (institution median 3; 0-235), and an increase to 762 cases in the period from 2014 to 2018 (12.5; 0-295). A total of 47 physicians responded to part 2 of the survey. Important indications for Re-RT that were considered were age, performance status, life expectancy, absence of distant metastases and time interval since previous radiotherapy. In addition to clinical decision-making factors, previous total radiation dose, volume of irradiated tissue and the biologically equivalent dose were considered during Re-RT planning. From the eight site-specific scenarios presented to the respondents, >60% of radiation oncologists agreed to perform Re-RT. Re-RT cases have increased in number, and interest in Re-RT among radiation oncologists has increased recently due to advances in technology. However, several problems exist that emphasize the need for consensus building and the establishment of guidelines for practice and prospective evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideya Yamazaki
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566 Japan
| | - Gen Suzuki
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566 Japan
| | - Norihiro Aibe
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566 Japan
| | - Satoaki Nakamura
- Department of Radiology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata 573-1010, Japan
| | - Ken Yoshida
- Department of Radiology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata 573-1010, Japan
| | - Ryoongjin Oh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miyakojima IGRT Clinic
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
A national surveillance study of the current status of reirradiation using brachytherapy in Japan. Brachytherapy 2020; 20:226-231. [PMID: 32888854 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2020] [Revised: 06/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to explore the current status and pattern of practice for reirradiation using brachytherapy (ReRT-BT) through a survey in Japan. MATERIALS AND METHODS We distributed an e-mail-based questionnaire to 153 institutions equipped with high-dose-rate brachytherapy facilities. RESULTS We received responses from 76 institutions (49.7%). Forty-three of these institutions performed ReRT-BT and 42 institutions (55%) performed ReRT-BT during 2009-2018. However, 29 of the 42 institutions (69%) reported difficulty in obtaining ReRT-BT case information from their respective databases. Almost all the institutions encountered insufficient database system to extract details about the ReRT-BT cases. Responses from 33 institutions included the number of ReRT-BT cases; this increased from 90 in the period 2009-2013 (institution median = 0.5; 0-16) to 172 in the period 2014-2018 (institution median = 2; 0-26). Nine institutions had to perform ReRT-BT for more than one case per year. The major location for cancer treatment was the pelvis (94%), followed by the head and neck (5%) and others (1%). In six site-specific scenarios, barring uterine corpus cancer recurrence, more than 90% of radiation oncologists agreed to perform ReRT-BT, whereas other areas (head and neck, prostate, and rectal cancer) gained 16-37% agreement. CONCLUSIONS This decade saw an increase in the number of ReRT-BT cases in Japan and radiation oncologists' interest in ReRT-BT as a viable therapeutic option. However, scarce availability, immature education system, and insufficient database system are barriers to further consensus building.
Collapse
|
5
|
Muirhead R, Jones B. Re-irradiation is Now a Real Option – But How Do We Take it Forward? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:65-66. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2017] [Accepted: 11/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
6
|
Yamazaki H, Fushiki M, Mizowaki T. A surveillance study of the current status of reirradiation and patterns of practice. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2017; 58:71-78. [PMID: 27609191 PMCID: PMC5321179 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrw059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2016] [Revised: 03/24/2016] [Accepted: 05/01/2016] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to survey the current status of reirradiation (Re-RT) and patterns of practice in Japan. An email questionnaire was sent to Kansai Cancer Therapist Group partner institutions, using questions similar to those in the Canadian radiation oncologist (RO) survey (2008). A total of 34 ROs from 28 institutions returned the survey. All 28 institutions experienced Re-RT cases in 2014. However, 26 of the 28 institutions (93%) reported difficulty in obtaining Re-RT case information from their respective databases. Responses from 19 institutions included the number of Re-RT cases; this rose from 183 in the period 2005-2009 (institution median = 4; 2-12.9) to 562 in the period 2010-2014 (institution median = 26; 2-225). Important considerations for indication of Re-RT were age (65%), performance status (83%), life expectancy (70%), absence of distant metastases (67%), and interval since previous treatment (73%). Previous total radiation dose (48%), volume of tissue irradiated (72%), and the biologically equivalent dose (BED; 68.5%) were taken into account during Re-RT planning. These factors were similar to those considered in the Canadian survey; however, the present study did not consider age. In eight site-specific scenarios, barring central nervous system recurrence, more than 90% of ROs agreed to perform Re-RT, which was higher than the percentage observed in the Canadian survey. Re-RT cases have increased in number and aroused interest among ROs in this decade of advanced technology. However, consensus building to establish guidelines for the practice and prospective evaluation of Re-RT is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideya Yamazaki
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan
| | - Masato Fushiki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagahama City Hospital, Nagahama, Shiga, Japan
| | - Takashi Mizowaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Li YR, Kirk M, Lin L. Proton Therapy for Vaginal Reirradiation. Int J Part Ther 2016; 3:320-326. [PMID: 28989947 PMCID: PMC5627360 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-16-00013.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2016] [Accepted: 06/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Primary or recurrent gynecologic cancers in operable patients with a history of prior pelvic radiation are typically treated with surgery based on the risk of late toxicities historically associated with reirradiation. A number of studies have demonstrated that, compared with conventional radiation therapy (RT) using photons, proton therapy (PT) offers dosimetric advantages for patients with gynecologic cancers by reducing radiation dose to healthy tissues. Thereby, we expect that, in appropriately selected cases, PT may reduce long-term treatment-related morbidities without compromising treatment efficacy. Herein, we describe the treatment planning, technique, and long-term follow-up of a patient who was treated with PT for a primary vaginal carcinoma nearly 30 years after a prior course of pelvic RT. Using this case, we illustrate the utility and advantages of PT in the treatment of cancers that occur at less favorable sites, adjacent to normal structures with low radiation tolerance, or in paients with a history of prior irradiation. Additionally, we provide a brief discussion and review of literature of prior case series of pelvic reirradiation, illustrating the value of identifying treatment approaches that can reduce treatment-related morbidities, particularly late treatment toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Rose Li
- Medical Scientist Training Program, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Maura Kirk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Lilie Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Modern Palliative Treatments for Metastatic Bone Disease: Awareness of Advantages, Disadvantages, and Guidance. Clin J Pain 2016; 32:337-50. [PMID: 25988937 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastatic disease is the most common malignancy of the bone. Prostate, breast, lung, kidney, and thyroid cancer account for 80% of skeletal metastases. Bone metastases are associated with significant skeletal morbidity including severe bone pain, pathologic fractures, spinal cord or nerve roots compression, and malignant hypercalcemia. These events compromise greatly the quality of life of the patients. The treatment of cancer patients with bone metastases is mostly aimed at palliation. OBJECTIVE This article aims to present these palliative treatments for the patients with bone metastases, summarize the clinical applications, and review the techniques and results. METHODS It gives an extensive overview of the possibilities of palliation in patients with metastatic cancer to the bone. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Currently, modern treatments are available for the palliative management of patients with metastatic bone disease. These include modern radiation therapy, chemotherapy, embolization, electrochemotherapy, radiofrequency ablation, and high-intensity focused ultrasound. As such it is of interest for all physicians with no experience with these developments to make palliative procedures safer and more reliable.
Collapse
|
9
|
Jones B, Grant W. Retreatment of Central Nervous System Tumours. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2014; 26:407-18. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2014.04.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2014] [Accepted: 04/09/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
10
|
Joseph K, Tai P, Wu J, Barnes E, Levin W. Workshop report: A practical approach and general principles of re-irradiation for in-field cancer recurrence. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2011; 22:885-9. [PMID: 20888198 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2010.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2010] [Revised: 06/03/2010] [Accepted: 08/18/2010] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
In-field cancer recurrence after previous adjuvant or radical radiotherapy presents particularly challenging clinical issues to the oncologists. A Canadian pattern of practice survey showed a wide range of approaches in treatment intent, planning and dose fractionation. A workshop on re-irradiation was conducted at the 2009 Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology annual scientific meeting, under the guidance of the Symptom Control Committee, in an effort to promote a uniform approach among radiation oncologists in their approach to re-irradiation. The workshop has made various recommendations in an effort to bring consistency among radiation oncologists across Canada to their approach towards re-irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Joseph
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Joseph KJ, Al-Mandhari Z, Pervez N, Parliament M, Wu J, Ghosh S, Tai P, Lian J, Levin W. Reirradiation after radical radiation therapy: a survey of patterns of practice among Canadian radiation oncologists. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 72:1523-9. [PMID: 18501531 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.03.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2007] [Revised: 03/18/2008] [Accepted: 03/19/2008] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this study was to survey the use of reirradiation (Re-RT) for in-field failures after previous radical radiation treatment (RT) among Canadian radiation oncologists (ROs). METHODS AND MATERIALS An electronic survey was sent to 271 ROs in Canada. The completed surveys were received electronically via e-mail and the data were analyzed using SAS 9.1.3 software. RESULTS A total of 183 ROs (67.5%) completed and returned the survey. The majority of the respondents were involved in the practice of either breast (48%) or genitourinary (43%) tumor sites. A total of 49% of the participants were interested in using Re-RT for the management of in-field recurrences. The goals of the therapy would be improvement of quality of life (99%), locoregional control (80%), or cure (32%). Most of the physicians believed that patients should have a minimum Karnofsky performance status of 50 or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 3, a minimum life expectancy of 3 months, and a minimum interval from initial treatment of 3 months if Re-RT were to be given with curative intent. CONCLUSIONS This survey showed that a wide variation existed among ROs in their approach to Re-RT. Newer technologies in RT planning and delivery would be employed to facilitate normal tissue avoidance. The results of this study suggested that a consensus meeting was needed to establish guidelines for the practice and prospective evaluation of Re-RT.
Collapse
|
12
|
Jones B, Dale RG, Deehan C, Hopkins KI, Morgan DA. The role of biologically effective dose (BED) in clinical oncology. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2001; 13:71-81. [PMID: 11373882 DOI: 10.1053/clon.2001.9221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
There are many clinical situations in which radiobiological considerations can be usefully applied and all clinicians should be aware of the potential benefits of developing a quantitative radiobiological approach to their practice. The concept of biologically effective dose (BED) in particular is useful for quantifying treatment expectations, but clinical oncologists should recognize that careful interpretation of modelling results is required before clinical decisions can be made and that there is a lack of reliable human parameters for application in some situations. Correct use of the BED concept will, in more complex treatment situations, sometimes involve the use of multiple parameters and BED calculations. Examples include: 1. Where the dose per fraction is being altered and it is possible that normal tissue tolerance may be compromised, calculations should include two or more alpha/beta ratio values, some being less than 3 Gy, in order to estimate the 'worst case scenario'. 2. A single one-point BED calculation will not be representative of the biological effect throughout a large planning target volume where there are significant 'hot spots'. Multiple BED evaluations are then indicated. 3. Where there are combinations of radiotherapy treatments or phases of treatments, these can be quantitatively assessed by the addition of BEDs, although the volume of tissue is not inherently included in the BED calculation and any high-dose region needs to be separately assessed as in point 2. 4. Allowance for tumour clonogen repopulation during therapy is required for some tumour types. 5. Different histological classes of cancers require the use of different alpha/beta ratios. Where there is reasonable doubt regarding this parameter, a suitable range should be used. The principles involved are illustrated by worked examples. Attention to detail and the examination of ranges of possible results should offer a safer guide to alternative dose fractionation schedules, although the ultimate choice will be tempered by clinical circumstances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Jones
- Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Old SE, Burnet NG, Macfarlane R, O'Donovan DG, Langmack K. Post-partum retreatment with iridium-192 wire brachytherapy for meningioma recurring in pregnancy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2001; 13:114-6. [PMID: 11373872 DOI: 10.1053/clon.2001.9232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
We report the case history of a female patient who had received radical radiotherapy for a malignant meningioma at the age of 11 years. Thirteen years later, during her first pregnancy, she presented with a recurrence. The tumour was surgically debulked, but complications related to postoperative sepsis, the location of the tumour, and the extent of her previous treatment made the delivery of adjuvant radiotherapy problematic. The tumour bed was treated using an interstitial implant of 192Ir wires to a dose of 60 Gy in 100 hours. The patient remains well with no evidence of tumour recurrence or brain necrosis 2 years later. We discuss the role of female sex hormones in meningioma and the difficulties of radical retreatment of tumours in the central nervous system. The various techniques of brachytherapy in the brain are highlighted. The specific advantages of 192Ir in this patient are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S E Old
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|