Estimation of contrast-to-noise ratio in CT and CBCT images with varying scan settings in presence of different implant materials

Pancreatic cancer in photon-counting CT: Low keV virtual monoenergetic images improve tumor conspicuity

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The aim of the study was to identify differences in the tumor conspicuity of pancreatic adenocarcinomas in different monoenergetic or polyenergetic reconstructions and contrast phases in photon-counting CT (PCCT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

34 patients were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Quantitative image analysis was performed with region of interest (ROI) measurements in different monoenergetic levels ranging from 40 up to 70 keV (5-point steps) and polyenergetic series. Tumor-parenchyma attenuation differences and contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) were calculated. A qualitative image analysis was accomplished by 4 radiologists using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = "not recognizable" up to 5 = "easy recognizable"). Differences between groups were evaluated for statistical significance using the Friedman test and in case of significant differences pair-wise post-hoc testing with Bonferroni correction was applied.

RESULTS

Tumor-parenchyma attenuation difference was significantly different between the different image reconstructions for both arterial- and portal-venous-phase-images (p < 0.001). Tumor-parenchyma attenuation difference was significantly higher on arterial-phase-images at mono40keV compared to polyenergetic images (p < 0.001) and mono55keV images or higher (p < 0.001). For portal-venous-phase-images tumor-parenchyma attenuation difference was significantly higher on mono40keV images compared to polyenergetic images (p < 0.001) and mono50keV images (p = 0.03) or higher (p < 0.001). The same trend was seen for CNR. Tumor conspicuity was rated best on mono40keV images with 4.3 ± 0.9 for arterial-phase-images and 4.3 ± 1.1 for portal-venous-phase-images. In contrast, overall image quality was rated best on polyenergetic-images with 4.8 ± 0.5 for arterial-phase-images and 4.7 ± 0.6 for portal-venous-phase-images.

CONCLUSION

Low keV virtual monoenergetic images significantly improve the tumor conspicuity of pancreatic adenocarcinomas in PCCT based on quantitative and qualitative results. On the other hand, readers prefer polyenergetic images for overall image quality.

Filtered back projection vs. iterative reconstruction for CBCT: effects on image noise and processing time

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of standard filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR) methods on CBCT image noise and processing time (PT), acquired with various acquisition parameters with and without metal artefact reduction (MAR).

METHODS

CBCT scans using the Midmark EIOS unit of a human mandible embedded in soft tissue equivalent material with and without the presence of an implant at mandibular first molar region were acquired at various acquisition settings (milliamperages [4mA-14mA], FOV [5 × 5, 6 × 8, 9 × 10 cm], and resolutions [low, standard, high] and reconstructed using standard FBP and IR, and with and without MAR. The processing time was recorded for each reconstruction. ImageJ was used to analyze specific axial images. Radial transaxial fiducial lines were created relative to the implant site. Standard deviations of the gray density values (image noise) were calculated at fixed distances on the fiducial lines on the buccal and lingual aspects at specific axial levels, and mean values for FBP and IR were compared using paired t-tests. Significance was defined as p < 0.05.

RESULTS

The overall mean for image noise (± SD) for FBP was 198.65 ± 55.58 and 99.84 ± 16.28 for IR. IR significantly decreased image noise compared to FBP at all acquisition parameters (p < 0.05). Noise reduction among different scanning protocols ranged between 29.7% (5 × 5 cm FOV) and 58.1% (5mA). IR increased processing time by an average of 35.1 s.

CONCLUSIONS

IR significantly reduces CBCT image noise compared to standard FBP without substantially increasing processing time.

The Impact of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Exposure Parameters on Peri-Implant Artifacts: A Literature Review

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) amounts to an excellent diagnostic tool to evaluate the peri-implant bone thickness in all dimensions. Despite the unquestionable advantages of CBCT, potential artifacts around dental implants might disturb the proper assessment of the surrounding structures. The artifacts may mask osseointegration, shallow bone defects, and other types of radiolucency, which make it difficult to establish an early diagnosis of bone loss. Proper diagnosis of bone defect is necessary to decide about surgical intervention. The aim of this literature review is to assess the CBCT exposure causing artifacts on the peri-implant structures. An electronic search of MEDLINE (PubMed) database includes studies published before July 2021 and supplemented by manual research. Clinical, ex vivo, in vitro, and animal studies evaluating the relationship between exposition parameters and occurrence of artifacts around the dental implant in CBCT studies were included. A literature review revealed that kilovoltage, tube current, and field of view may affect the occurrence of artifacts around dental implants, all of which would compromise radiological evaluation. Therefore, it is feasible to reduce the incidence of artifacts and improve the image quality by appropriate modification of the exposure parameters. However, the reduction of artifacts is often associated with a significant increase in radiation exposure; hence, an effort should be made to minimize the radiation dose in line with the ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) principle.

Image-Quality Assessment of Polyenergetic and Virtual Monoenergetic Reconstructions of Unenhanced CT Scans of the Head: Initial Experiences with the First Photon-Counting CT Approved for Clinical Use

In 2021, the first clinical photon-counting CT (PCCT) was introduced. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the image quality of polyenergetic and virtual monoenergetic reconstructions in unenhanced PCCTs of the head. A total of 49 consecutive patients with unenhanced PCCTs of the head were retrospectively included. The signals ± standard deviations of the gray and white matter were measured at three different locations in axial slices, and a measure of the artifacts below the cranial calvaria and in the posterior fossa between the petrous bones was also obtained. The signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were calculated for all reconstructions. In terms of the SNRs and CNRs, the polyenergetic reconstruction is superior to all virtual monoenergetic reconstructions (p < 0.001). In the MERs, the highest SNR is found in the 70 keV MER, and the highest CNR is in the 65 keV MER. In terms of artifacts below the cranial calvaria and in the posterior fossa, certain MERs are superior to polyenergetic reconstruction (p < 0.001). The PCCT provided excellent image contrast and low-noise profiles for the differentiation of the grey and white matter. Only the artifacts below the calvarium and in the posterior fossa still underperform, which is attributable to the lack of an artifact reduction algorithm in image postprocessing. It is conceivable that the usual improvements in image postprocessing, especially with regard to glaring artifacts, will lead to further improvements in image quality.