1
|
Hong SK, Kim M, Kim Y, Kim JY, Lee J, Kim J, Hong SY, Lee JM, Choi Y, Yi NJ, Lee KW, Suh KS. Donor body mass index over 30 is no barrier for pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2024; 28:337-343. [PMID: 38566519 PMCID: PMC11341885 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.24-020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims Challenges arise when translating pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH) results from Asian to Western donors, due to differences in body mass index (BMI). This study compares the outcomes of PLDRH and conventional open donor right hepatectomy (CDRH) in donors with BMI over 30. Methods Medical records of live liver donors (BMI > 30) undergoing right hepatectomy (2010-2021) were compared: 25 PLDRH cases vs. 19 CDRH cases. Donor and recipient demographics, operative details, and outcomes were analyzed. Results PLDRH and CDRH had similar donor and recipient characteristics. PLDRH had longer liver removal and warm ischemic times, but a shorter post-liver removal duration than CDRH. Donor complication rates were comparable, with the highest complication being grade IIIa in PLDRH, necessitating needle aspiration for biloma on postoperative day 11. Fortunately, this donor fully recovered without additional treatment. No complications exceeding Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa occurred in either group. Recipient outcomes between the groups were similar. Conclusions This study supports PLDRH as a viable option for donors with BMI over 30, challenging the notion that high BMI should deter considering PLDRH. The findings provide valuable insights into the safety and feasibility of PLDRH, encouraging further exploration of this technique in diverse donor populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suk Kyun Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Minseob Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Youngjin Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae-Yoon Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jaewon Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jiyoung Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Su Young Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong-Moo Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - YoungRok Choi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Nam-Joon Yi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kwang-Woong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hong SK, Choi Y, Yi NJ, Lee KW, Suh KS. Insights from Seoul National University Hospital's experience: a systematic review of pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy progression. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2024; 13:293-300. [PMID: 38617478 PMCID: PMC11007335 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-23-239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
Following its initial execution in November 2015, pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (PLDH) has gained acceptance as a conventional practice at Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH). It is noteworthy that a significant proportion of cases entail full right hepatectomies, which are acknowledged to be technically demanding. As expertise and knowledge have been accrued, the pure laparoscopic technique has been extended to encompass liver recipients as a viable option in SNUH. The aim of this review is to present the developmental progression of PLDH, with a focus on pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH), at SNUH. This includes the standardization process, which can be achieved by sharing the hospital's accumulated experience and previous reports. Various types of graft, including full right, left, left lateral section, and monosegment, were procured by pure laparoscopic technique. The criteria for selection were expanded to include donors with variations in the anatomy of the portal vein and bile duct. Additionally, the procedure of PLDRH was determined to be safe and viable for donors with high body mass index and larger graft weight. In conclusion, this review demonstrates the alterations implemented throughout our evolution from restricted to inclusive criteria for donor selection, leading to a complete shift from open surgery to pure laparoscopic procedures in donor hepatectomy and eventually pure laparoscopic living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in recipient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suk Kyun Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - YoungRok Choi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Nam-Joon Yi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kwang-Woong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hong SK, Kim JY, Lee J, Kim J, Choi HH, Lee S, Hong SY, Lee JM, Choi Y, Yi NJ, Lee KW, Suh KS. Pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy: Experience of 556 cases at Seoul National University Hospital. Am J Transplant 2024; 24:222-238. [PMID: 37321453 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (PLDH) has become a routine procedure at Seoul National University Hospital, and the pure laparoscopic method is now being applied to liver recipients as well. This study aimed to review the procedure and outcomes of PLDH to identify any areas that required improvement. Data from 556 donors who underwent PLDH between November 2015 and December 2021 and their recipients were retrospectively reviewed. Among these, 541 patients underwent pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH). The mean hospital stay of the donor was 7.2 days, and the rate of grade I, II, IIIa, and IIIb complications was 2.2%, 2.7%, 1.3%, and 0.9%, respectively, without any irreversible disabilities or mortalities. The most common early and late major complications in the recipient were intraabdominal bleeding (n = 47, 8.5%) and biliary problems (n = 198, 35.6%), respectively. Analysis of the PLDRH procedure showed that operative time, liver removal time, warm ischemic time, Δhemoglobin%, Δtotal bilirubin%, and postoperative hospital stay decreased significantly as the number of cases accumulated. In conclusion, the operative outcomes of PLDRH improved as the number of cases increased. However, continuous caution is needed because major complications still occur in donors and recipients even after hundreds of cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suk Kyun Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - Jae-Yoon Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jaewon Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jiyoung Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hyun Hwa Choi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sola Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Su Young Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jeong-Moo Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - YoungRok Choi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Nam-Joon Yi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kwang-Woong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lin JS, Muhammad H, Lin T, Kamel I, Baghdadi A, Rizkalla N, Ottmann SE, Wesson R, Philosophe B, Gurakar A. Donor BMI and Post-living Donor Liver Transplantation Outcomes: A Preliminary Report. Transplant Direct 2023; 9:e1431. [PMID: 36700065 PMCID: PMC9835892 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Revised: 11/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Living liver donor obesity has been considered a relative contraindication to living donation given the association with hepatic steatosis and potential for poor donor and recipient outcomes. We investigated the association between donor body mass index (BMI) and donor and recipient posttransplant outcomes. Methods We studied 66 living donors and their recipients who underwent living donor liver transplant at our center between 2013 and 2020. BMI was divided into 3 categories (<25, 25-29.9, and ≥30 kg/m2). Magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction was used to quantify steatosis. Donor outcomes included length of stay (LOS), emergency department visits within 90 d, hospital readmissions within 90 d, and complication severity. Recipient outcomes included LOS and in-hospital mortality. The Student t test was used to compare normally distributed variables, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for nonparametric data. Results There was no difference in donor or recipient characteristics based on donor BMI. There was no significant difference in mean magnetic resonance imaging fat percentage among the 3 groups. Additionally, there was no difference in donor LOS (P = 0.058), emergency department visits (P = 0.64), and hospital readmissions (P = 0.66) across BMI category. Donor complications occurred in 30 patients. There was no difference in postdonation complications across BMI category (P = 0.19); however, there was a difference in wound complications, with the highest rate being seen in the highest BMI group (0% versus 16% versus 37%; P = 0.041). Finally, there was no difference in recipient LOS (P = 0.83) and recipient in-hospital mortality (P = 0.29) across BMI category. Conclusions Selecting donors with BMI ≥30 kg/m2 can result in successful living donor liver transplantation; however, they are at risk for perioperative wound complications. Donor counseling and perioperative strategies to mitigate wound-related issues should be used when considering obese living donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica S. Lin
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Haris Muhammad
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Timothy Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ihab Kamel
- Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Azarakhsh Baghdadi
- Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Nicole Rizkalla
- Department of Anesthesia, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Shane E. Ottmann
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Russell Wesson
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Benjamin Philosophe
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ahmet Gurakar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zimmitti G, Sijberden JP, Osei-Bordom D, Russolillo N, Aghayan D, Lanari J, Cipriani F, López-Ben S, Rotellar F, Fuks D, D'Hondt M, Primrose JN, Görgec B, Cacciaguerra AB, Marudanayagam R, Langella S, Vivarelli M, Ruzzenente A, Besselink MG, Alseidi A, Efanov M, Giuliante F, Dagher I, Jovine E, di Benedetto F, Aldrighetti LA, Cillo U, Edwin B, Ferrero A, Sutcliffe RP, Hilal MA. Indications, trends, and perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive and open liver surgery in non-obese and obese patients: An international multicentre propensity score matched retrospective cohort study of 9963 patients. Int J Surg 2022; 107:106957. [PMID: 36252942 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Revised: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the worldwide increase of both obesity and the use of minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS), evidence regarding the safety and eventual benefits of MILS in obese patients is scarce. The aim of this study was therefore to compare the outcomes of non-obese and obese patients (BMI 18.5-29.9 and BMI≥30, respectively) undergoing MILS and OLS, and to assess trends in MILS use among obese patients. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, patients operated at 20 hospitals in eight countries (2009-2019) were included and the characteristics and outcomes of non-obese and obese patients were compared. Thereafter, the outcomes of MILS and OLS were compared in both groups after propensity-score matching (PSM). Changes in the adoption of MILS during the study period were investigated. RESULTS Overall, 9963 patients were included (MILS: n = 4687; OLS: n = 5276). Compared to non-obese patients (n = 7986), obese patients(n = 1977) were more often comorbid, less often received preoperative chemotherapy or had a history of previous hepatectomy, had longer operation durations and more intraoperative blood loss (IOBL), paralleling significantly higher rates of wound- and respiratory-related complications. After PSM, MILS, compared to OLS, was associated, among both non-obese and obese patients, with less IOBL (200 ml vs 320 ml, 200 ml vs 400 ml, respectively), lower rates of transfusions (6.6% vs 12.8%, 4.7% vs 14.7%), complications (26.1% vs 35%, 24.9% vs 34%), bile leaks(4% vs 7%, 1.8% vs 4.9%), liver failure (0.7% vs 2.3%, 0.2% vs 2.1%), and a shorter length of stay(5 vs 7 and 4 vs 7 days). A cautious implementation of MILS over time in obese patients (42.1%-53%, p < .001) was paralleled by stable severe morbidity (p = .433) and mortality (p = .423) rates, despite an accompanying gradual increase in surgical complexity. CONCLUSIONS MILS is increasingly adopted and associated with perioperative benefits in both non-obese and obese patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Zimmitti
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Umberto I Mauriziano Hospital, Largo Turati 62, 10128, Turin, Italy The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy Servei de Cirurgia General i Digestiva, Hospital Doctor Josep Trueta de Girona, Girona, Catalonia, Spain Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, 75014, France Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Riuniti Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, USA Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, California, USA Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Research Centre, Moscow, Russia Chirurgia Epatobiliare, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore-IRCCS, Rome, Italy Department of Digestive Minimally Invasive Surgery, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Paris, France Direttore Chirurgia Generale A ed Urgenza, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Andacoglu O, Tokat Y, Malamutmann E, Adali G, Emre A, Oezcelik A. Outcomes of right lobe donors with BMI≥30 for living donor liver transplantation. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14698. [PMID: 35561085 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Revised: 04/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Donor BMI above 30 is generally considered contraindication for donor hepatectomy. We compared the donor outcomes based on BMI threshold and weight loss. PATIENTS AND METHODS All potential donors were identified and data were collected retrospectively. Steatosis was assessed based on liver-spleen Hounsfield unit difference and absolute liver intensity values. We compared BMI≥30 (n = 53) and BMI<30 (n = 64) donor outcomes. Donors with weight loss (WL) prior to surgery were also analyzed separately. Complications were graded by Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS All donors underwent open right donor hepatectomy. There was no difference between BMI≥30 and <30 groups except female predominance in BMI≥30 group (p = 0.006). Both groups had similar rates of complication rates in all categories, similar remnant volume, operative time, length of stay and similar postoperative liver function recovery (all p>0.05). On the other hand, donors with WL were more commonly male, had smaller graft size, and higher biliary complications rates compared to no-WL donors (all p<0.05). Multivariate binary logistics regression analysis revealed no association between BMI or WL and outcomes. CONCLUSION We demonstrate that donors with BMI≥30 have similar outcomes compared to BMI<30 donors with our defined selection criterion, therefore BMI≥30 is not an absolute contraindication to donate right liver, provided that there is no significant steatosis and remnant liver is satisfactory. For potential overweight donors, WL down to BMI<30 is a reasonable target. Higher biliary complication rates after WL should be investigated further. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oya Andacoglu
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medicine of Essen, Essen, Germany.,Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.,International Liver Center, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yaman Tokat
- International Liver Center, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Eugen Malamutmann
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medicine of Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Gupse Adali
- Department of Gastroenterology, Umraniye Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Anilalp Emre
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medicine of Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Arzu Oezcelik
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medicine of Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|