Misdiagnosis of Myasthenia Gravis and Subsequent Clinical Implication: A case report and review of literature

The impact of diagnosis delay on European patients with generalised myasthenia gravis

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to determine the mean duration of diagnosis delay for patients with myasthenia gravis from five European countries and explore the impact of >1 year diagnosis delay.

METHODS

Patients with myasthenia gravis (N = 387) from Europe (France/Germany/Italy/Spain/United Kingdom) and their physicians participated in the Adelphi Real World Myasthenia Gravis Disease Specific Programme™. Diagnosis delay (time from symptom onset to diagnosis) was calculated and characteristics described for patients experiencing >1 year and ≤1 year diagnosis delay. Denominators varied according to outcome as missing data were not imputed.

RESULTS

Mean (standard deviation) diagnosis delay was 363.1 (520.9) days, and 27.1% (105 out of 387) of patients experienced diagnosis delay >1 year. Among patients with >1 year and ≤1 year diagnosis delay, respectively, 69.2% (72 out of 104) and 17.4% [45 out of 259] had initially received a different diagnosis (physician-reported); 40.0% (42 out of 105) and 24.1% (68 out of 282) were Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America class III at the time of the survey (physician-reported); 72.4% (76 out of 105) and 61.3% (173 out of 282) had fatigue (subjective physician reporting from a pre-selected list of symptoms); 30.5% (32 out of 105) and 17.4% (49 out of 282) had anxiety and 21.9% (23 out of 105) and 13.1% (37 out of 282) had depression (both subjective physician reporting from a pre-selected list, Likert-style); and mean (standard deviation) MG-QoL-15r score was 14.4 (5.50) and 12.6 (7.84) (self-reported by N = 43 and N = 74 patients, respectively).

INTERPRETATION

More than a quarter of patients with myasthenia gravis experienced diagnosis delay of >1 year. These patients had a different clinical profile with regards to severity, symptoms, comorbidities and MG-QoL-15r score, compared with patients experiencing ≤1 year diagnosis delay.

Electrophysiologic evaluation of myasthenia gravis and its mimics: real-world experience with single-fiber electromyography

OBJECTIVES

In centers which routinely perform single fiber electromyography (SFEMG) for suspected myasthenia gravis (MG), the additional benefit of other neurophysiologic investigations and the frequency of myasthenia mimics has not been ascertained. We aimed to illustrate the range of neurological and non-neurological myasthenia mimics referred for evaluation, and contrast features of their electrophysiologic evaluation with confirmed MG.

METHODS

We reviewed all SFEMG studies performed at our center between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2020. Patient demographics, clinical phenotype, antibody status and final diagnosis were recorded. Electrophysiologic findings were correlated with clinical features and sensitivity analyses performed.

RESULTS

A total of 528 SFEMG studies were performed, of which 213 (41%) were abnormal. A diagnosis of MG was made in 101 individuals, including 46 with ocular MG and 35 with seronegative disease. Compared to myasthenia mimics with an abnormal SFEMG, individuals with MG had higher median jitter (mean consecutive difference 61 μs vs. 42 μs, p < 0.001) and a greater percentage of abnormal pairs (61% vs. 33%, p < 0.001) on SFEMG. Repetitive nerve stimulation was abnormal in 27.1% of people with MG and was associated with a generalized clinical phenotype (OR 4.17; 95% CI 1.67-10.48). Thirteen (2%) individuals with MG had normal SFEMG, of whom 10 were in clinical remission. Functional neurological disorders, cranial nerve palsies, primary ocular disease and myopathy were frequent myasthenia mimics.

CONCLUSION

SFEMG can be abnormal in a number of myasthenia mimics, and routine nerve conduction studies and electromyography should always be undertaken. In centers where SFEMG is performed routinely for the investigation of suspected MG, extensive proximal repetitive nerve stimulation can be foregone without substantially affecting diagnostic evaluation. Normal SFEMG in those with confirmed myasthenia gravis may help indicate clinical remission.

Development of a Model Care Pathway for Myasthenia Gravis

Myasthenia Gravis (MG) is a chronic, life-lasting condition that requires high coordination among different professionals and disciplines. The diagnosis of MG is often delayed and sometimes misdiagnosed. The goal of the care pathway (CP) is to add value to healthcare reducing unnecessary variations. The quality of the care received by patients affected with MG could benefit from the use of CP. We conducted a study aimed to define an inclusive, comprehensive, and multidisciplinary CP for the diagnosis, treatment, and care of MG. The development of the model CP, key interventions, and process indicators is based on the literature review and 85 international MG experts were involved in their evaluation, expressing a judgment of relevance through the Delphi study. 60 activities are included in the model CP and evaluated by the MG experts were valid and feasible. The 60 activities were then translated into 14 key interventions and 24 process indicators. We believe that the developed model CP will help for MG patients to have a timely diagnosis and high-quality, accessible, and cost-effective treatments and care. We also believe that the development of model CPs for other rare diseases is feasible and could aid in the integration of evidence-based knowledge into clinical practice.

Myasthenia gravis presenting as bilateral pseudointernuclear ophthalmoplegia in a patient with an incidental prolactinoma

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare and potentially dangerous autoimmune condition, which affects the acetylcholine receptors at the neuromuscular junction of skeletal muscle. MG's diverse symptomatology may readily masquerade as other neurological conditions, posing a diagnostic challenge to clinicians. We describe a 24-year old man who presented to the emergency department with a new onset internuclear ophthalmoplegia. After a series of investigations, we eventually arrived at a diagnosis of MG with pseudointernuclear ophthalmoplegia with an incidentally detected prolactinoma. We explore the literature regarding the pathophysiology of pseudointernuclear ophthalmoplegia, the link between prolactin and autoimmunity and the association between prolactinoma and MG.