Vascular impulse technology versus elevation for the reduction of swelling of lower extremity joint fractures: results of a prospective randomized controlled study

Analysis of the cost-efficiency of the vascular impulse technology (VIT) in the perioperative management of complex ankle fractures: results of a prospective randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Posttraumatic swelling causes a delay in surgery, a prolonged hospital stay and a higher risk of complications. Thus, soft tissue conditioning following complex ankle fractures is of central importance in their perioperative management. Since the clinical benefit of VIT usage on the clinical course has been shown, it should now be investigated whether it is also cost-efficient in doing so.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Included are published clinical results of the prospective, randomised, controlled, monocentric VIT study that have proven the therapeutic benefit in complex ankle fractures. Participants were allocated in a 1:1 ratio into the intervention group (VIT) and the control group (elevation). In this study, the required economic parameters of these clinical cases were collected on the data of the financial accounting and an estimation of annual cases had been performed to extrapolate the cost-efficiency of this therapy. The primary endpoint was the mean savings (in €).

RESULTS

Thirty-nine cases were studied in the period from 2016 to 2018. There was no difference in the generated revenue. However, due to lower incurred costs in the intervention group, there were potential savings of about €2000 (p_ITT = 0.073) to 3000 (p_AT = 0.008) per patient compared to the control group with therapy costs decreasing as the number of patients treated increases from €1400 in one case to below €200 per patient in 10 cases. There were 20% more revision surgeries in the control group or 50 min more OR time, respectively, and an increased attendance by staff and medical personnel of more than 7 h.

CONCLUSIONS

VIT therapy has been shown to be a beneficial therapeutic modality, but it is so not only in regard to soft-tissue conditioning but also cost efficiency.

Vascular impulse technology versus elevation for reducing the swelling of upper and lower extremity joint fractures

Soft-tissue conditioning due to posttraumatic oedema after complicated joint fractures is a central therapeutic aspect both pre- and postoperatively. On average, 6-10 days pass until the patient is suitable for surgery. This study compares the decongestant effect of vascular impulse technology (VIT) with that of conventional elevation. In this monocentric RCT, 68 patients with joint fractures of the upper (n = 36) and lower (n = 32) extremity were included and randomized after consent in a 1:1 ratio. Variables were evaluated for all fractures together and additionally subdivided into upper or lower extremity for better clinical comparability. Primary endpoint was the time in days from hospital admission to operability. Secondary endpoints were total length of stay, oedema reduction, pain intensity, complications, and revisions. The time from admission until operability was reduced by 1.4 (95% CI - 0.4; 3.1) days in the mITT analysis (p = 0.120) and was statistically significant with 1.7 (95% CI 0.1; 3.3) days in the as-treated sensitivity analysis (p_AT = 0.038). Significantly less pain and a faster oedema reduction were found in the intervention group. Due to rare occurrences, nothing can be concluded regarding complications and revisions. Administration of VIT therapy did not lead to a significant reduction in time until operability in the whole population but was superior to elevation for soft-tissue conditioning and pain reduction. However, there was a significant reduction by 2.5 days (95% CI 0.7; 4.3) in the subgroup of lower extremity fractures. VIT therapy therefore seems to be a helpful tool in the treatment of posttraumatic oedema after complex joint fractures of the lower and upper extremity, especially in tibial head and lower leg fractures.

A Current Concepts Update in Pilon Fracture Management

A review of the existing literature, related to treatment options and management principles of pilon fractures, was performed, and its results are presented. Pilon fractures have a very diverse pattern, but there are general characteristics to help diagnose and plan therapy. The choice of therapy is highly dependent on the surrounding soft-tissue environment. Different methods of treatment, lack of standard management protocols, and the high risk of complications make this injury one of the biggest challenges that an orthopedic surgeon can face. This review focuses on the general aspects of the pilon fracture management as well as its complications and possible solutions.