Arthroscopic biceps augmentation does not improve clinical outcomes during incomplete repair of large to massive rotator cuff tears

Clinical Outcomes and Re-Tear Rates for Partial Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With or Without Biceps Augmentation for Large-to-Massive Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The recent addition of biceps tendon augmentation to partial arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) for the treatment of large-to-massive rotator cuff tears is proposed to improve clinical outcomes and reduce re-tears.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis (5 studies) was to compare outcomes between partial ARCR with (142 patients) and without (149 patients) biceps augmentation.

RESULTS

Partial ARCR with and without biceps augmentation were comparable in pain, function, and range of motion. However, biceps augmentation vs no augmentation at all during ARCR may lower re-tear rates for irreparable large-to-massive rotator cuff tears (42.9% vs 72.5%, P=.007).

CONCLUSION

More research is needed to investigate this technique and guide surgical decision-making. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(5):e217-e224.].

Reduced retear rates yet similar clinical outcomes following arthroscopic partial repair of large and massive irreparable rotator cuff tears with biceps augmentation compared to repairs without biceps augmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical outcomes between arthroscopic partial rotator cuff repair with biceps augmentation (BA) and partial repair (PR) without BA.

METHODS

This systematic review included studies comparing outcomes of arthroscopic repair for large to massive irreparable rotator cuff tears with and without the BA. The focus was on postoperative clinical results and retear rates. Mean differences were used to express continuous outcomes, while odds ratios (ORs) were employed for dichotomous outcomes.

RESULTS

Ten studies (733 shoulders, all level 3 evidence) were included. The BA group showed a significant reduction in retear rates (OR = 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20-0.77, P = 0.007) and comparable postoperative outcomes across various measures: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, visual analogue scale for pain, University of California-Los Angeles shoulder score, active forward flexion motion and active external rotation at the arm-at-side position compared to the PR group. Subgroup analysis of two BA techniques-rerouting and supplementation following supraglenoid tenotomy-showed no significant differences in ASES score for either technique versus PR. However, rerouting significantly lowered retear rates (OR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.12-0.36, p < 0.001), while supplementation showed similar retear rates to PR (OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.37-2.02, n.s.).

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic partial rotator cuff repair with BA for large to massive irreparable rotator cuff tears is a reliable technique, resulting in improved postoperative outcomes. BA using supplementation following supraglenoid tenotomy showed similar clinical outcomes and range of motion but with lower retear rates compared to the PR group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Patch Augmentation in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Surgery-Review of Current Evidence and Newest Trends

Background: Rotator cuff tears are a common and debilitating condition requiring surgical intervention. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is essential for restoring shoulder function and alleviating pain. Tear classification by size and tendon retraction, along with the grade for fatty infiltration, influence postoperative outcomes, with large tears and higher fatty infiltration grades linked to higher retear rates. Managing complex tears is challenging, with failure rates ranging from 20 to 94%. Patch augmentation has emerged as a promising strategy, using biological or synthetic materials to reinforce tendon repairs, enhancing structural integrity and reducing retear risk. Methods: A review of the recent literature from January 2018 to March 2024 was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science. Keywords included "rotator cuff tear", "rotator cuff augmentation", "rotator cuff patch", "tendon augmentation", "massive rotator cuff tear", "patch augmentation", and "grafts". Relevant articles were selected based on their abstracts for a comprehensive review. Results: Initial methods used autograft tissues, but advances in biomaterials have led to standardized, biocompatible synthetic patches. Studies show reduced retear rates with patch augmentation, ranging from 17 to 45%. Conclusions: Patch augmentation reduces the retear rates and improves tendon repair, but complications like immune responses and infections persist. Cost-effectiveness analyses indicate that while initial costs are higher, long-term savings from reduced rehabilitation, revision surgeries, and increased productivity can make patch augmentation economically beneficial.

Arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction augmentation using a semitendinosus autograft in massive reparable rotator cuff tears

Background

Arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) augmentation is a viable treatment option for massive reparable cuff tears. This study aimed to retrospectively compare clinical and imaging outcomes of patients with reparable massive rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) with those after SCR augmentation using a semitendinosus autograft.

Methods

We retrospectively compared 50 patients with massive reparable rotator cuff tears who underwent ARCR and SCR augmentation (n = 25 each). Patients were clinically followed up for at least 2 years, and the American Shoulder and Elbow index, other patient-reported outcomes, active range of motion, and radiography and magnetic resonance imaging findings were assessed.

Results

At the final follow-up, both patient groups showed significant improvements in forward elevation in range of motion and visual analog scale scores. Improvements in the American Shoulder and Elbow scores in the SCR augmentation group were significantly superior to those in the ARCR group (48.3 and 28.9, P < .01). There was a significant difference in the retear rate between the SCR augmentation group and ARCR group (20% and 56%, respectively; P = .009).

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that patient-reported outcomes and retear rates in patients who underwent SCR augmentation with rotator cuff repair for massive rotator cuff tears significantly improved compared with those in patients who underwent ARCR without augmentation. Augmentation with semitendinosus autografting during rotator cuff repair represents a solution for patients with massive reparable rotator cuff tears.

Long Head of the Biceps Pediculated Autograft Augmentation of Arthroscopic Subscapularis Repair

Subscapularis (SSc) repairs are not free of failure and continues to pose a challenging problem. Although various biological and structural augmentation methods are available for the posterosuperior rotator cuff, few options have been explored for the anterior one. In the Technical Note, we describe an all-arthroscopic technique in which we use the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) as a pediculated autograft to reinforce an SSc repair. After SSc repair and LHBT tenodesis, the intra-articular portion of the LHBT is placed on the upper part of the SSc tendon at the rotator interval. Repurposing the otherwise-discarded tendon brings several biological and mechanical advantages at a lower cost without donor-site morbidity.

Arthroscopic decompression of calcific tendinitis without cuff repair

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of arthroscopic decompression of calcific tendinitis performed without repairing the rotator cuff defect.

Methods

A total of 99 patients who underwent treatment between December 2013 and August 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were reviewed pre- and postoperatively according to the location, size, physical characteristics, and radiological features of the calcific deposits. Additionally, the influence of any residual calcific deposits shown on postoperative radiographs was explored. The healing rate of the unrepaired cuff defect was determined by reviewing the 29 patients who had follow-up MRIs.

Results

Statistically significant improvement from pre- to postoperation was seen in all VAS and ASES scores for each group, but no statistical differences were seen between the postoperative scores according to the differences in the features of the calcific deposits. When residual calcification was observed postoperatively, the mean ASES and VAS (rest) scores improved significantly to 95.0 (SD 5.6) and 0.0 (SD 0.0), respectively (p = 0.006 and p < 0.001), and did not differ from those who had the complete removal. Of 29 patients who had follow-up MRIs, six (20.7%) showed signs of an interstitial tear. This group's mean postoperative ASES and VAS (rest) scores improved to excellent levels of 96.0 (SD 3.7) and 0.0 (SD 0.0), respectively, and were similar to those of the 23 patients with normal MRI appearances.

Conclusion

Arthroscopic removal of calcific deposits without repairing the rotator cuff defect resulted in significant improvement in function and pain level, regardless of the deposit's location, size, type, and whether or not complete excision was achieved. Despite leaving the defects unrepaired, in the limited number of patients with follow-up MRIs, 23 of 29 patients (79.3%) showed good healing, and the rest, who had persistent signs of interstitial defects on the MRIs, still had excellent outcomes. The removal of calcific deposits without repairing the cuff defects provided excellent outcomes.