1
|
Sun H, Liu W, Sun X, Gao Y, Chen Y, Lin Y, Song J, Zhang Z, Wang BH, Li L, Feng H, Tan H, Chen Q, Peng L, Dai W, Wu IXY. Development and Validation of Knowledge Assessment Scales for Dementia and Urinary Incontinence in Community Older People. J Appl Gerontol 2024; 43:1042-1051. [PMID: 38488166 DOI: 10.1177/07334648241236036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/09/2024] Open
Abstract
To develop and validate scales for reliably assessing dementia and urinary incontinence knowledge of older adults in the community. Items were generated through a literature review, refined through a Delphi study (n = 19), and then revised through a pilot study (n = 29). Item analysis and exploratory factor analysis were applied to finalize the scales (n = 244). Construct validity, reliability, and acceptability were evaluated (n = 243). The two knowledge assessment scales for dementia and urinary incontinence, respectively, comprised 12 items and 8 items. Model fit indicators of both met the criteria of confirmatory factor analysis. Cronbach's α were .82 and .70, respectively. Completion ratio and completion time of the two scales was 83.51% and 4.22 ± 1.90 minutes. The knowledge assessment scales for dementia and urinary incontinence with satisfactory validity, reliability, and acceptability, could be served as valid tools for disease prevention and management among older adults in the community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Sun
- Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Wenqi Liu
- Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xuemei Sun
- Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yinyan Gao
- Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yancong Chen
- Changsha Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changsha, China
| | - Yali Lin
- Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jinlu Song
- Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Zixuan Zhang
- Changsha Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changsha, China
| | - Betty H Wang
- Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Lingqi Li
- Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Hui Feng
- Xiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Hongzhuan Tan
- Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Qiong Chen
- Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Linlin Peng
- Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Wenjie Dai
- Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology, Changsha, China
| | - Irene X Y Wu
- Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Albishi W, AbuDujain NM, Arafah O, Alshaygy IS, Aldosari ZA, Alhuqbani MN, Alangari SM. Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the Forgotten Joint Score for knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2023; 31:4312-4318. [PMID: 37329371 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07484-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Arabic version of this questionnaire in Arabic patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS The Arabic version of the English FJS (Ar-FJS) was modified according to cross-cultural adaptation best practices. The study included 111 patients who underwent TKA 1-5 years ago and completed the Ar-FJS. The reduced Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (rWOMAC) and 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) were used to assess the construct validity of the study. Fifty-two individuals took the Ar-FJS test twice to evaluate the test-retest reliability. RESULTS The reliability of the Ar-FJS demonstrated a Cronbach's α value of 0.940 and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.951. The ceiling effect of the Ar-FJS was 5.4% (n = 6), whereas the floor effect was 1.8% (n = 2). Additionally, the Ar-FJS showed correlation coefficients of 0.753 and 0.992 for the rWOMAC and SF-36, respectively. CONCLUSION The Ar-FJS-12 demonstrated excellent internal consistency, repeatability, construct validity, and content validity and can be recommended for patients in Arabic-speaking communities who have undergone knee arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waleed Albishi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nasser M AbuDujain
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Orfan Arafah
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ibrahim S Alshaygy
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Zyad A Aldosari
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Mohammed N Alhuqbani
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Saad M Alangari
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Griffin J, Davis ET, Parsons H, Gemperle Mannion E, Khatri C, Ellard DR, Blyth MJ, Clement ND, Deehan D, Flynn N, Fox J, Grant NJ, Haddad FS, Hutchinson CE, Mason J, Mohindru B, Scott CEH, Smith TO, Skinner JA, Toms AD, Rees S, Underwood M, Metcalfe A. Robotic Arthroplasty Clinical and cost Effectiveness Randomised controlled trial (RACER-knee): a study protocol. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e068255. [PMID: 37295832 PMCID: PMC10277111 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Robotic-assisted knee replacement systems have been introduced to healthcare services worldwide in an effort to improve clinical outcomes for people, although high-quality evidence that they are clinically, or cost-effective remains sparse. Robotic-arm systems may improve surgical accuracy and could contribute to reduced pain, improved function and lower overall cost of total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. However, TKR with conventional instruments may be just as effective and may be quicker and cheaper. There is a need for a robust evaluation of this technology, including cost-effectiveness analyses using both within-trial and modelling approaches. This trial will compare robotic-assisted against conventional TKR to provide high-quality evidence on whether robotic-assisted knee replacement is beneficial to patients and cost-effective for healthcare systems. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The Robotic Arthroplasty Clinical and cost Effectiveness Randomised controlled trial-Knee is a multicentre, participant-assessor blinded, randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted TKR compared with TKR using conventional instruments. A total of 332 participants will be randomised (1:1) to provide 90% power for a 12-point difference in the primary outcome measure; the Forgotten Joint Score at 12 months postrandomisation. Allocation concealment will be achieved using computer-based randomisation performed on the day of surgery and methods for blinding will include sham incisions for marker clusters and blinded operation notes. The primary analysis will adhere to the intention-to-treat principle. Results will be reported in line with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement. A parallel study will collect data on the learning effects associated with robotic-arm systems. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The trial has been approved by an ethics committee for patient participation (East Midlands-Nottingham 2 Research Ethics Committee, 29 July 2020. NRES number: 20/EM/0159). All results from the study will be disseminated using peer-reviewed publications, presentations at international conferences, lay summaries and social media as appropriate. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN27624068.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Griffin
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Edward T Davis
- Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Helen Parsons
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Elke Gemperle Mannion
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Chetan Khatri
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - David R Ellard
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Mark J Blyth
- Orthopaedic Research Unit, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | - Nicholas David Clement
- Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Edinburgh Division of Clinical and Surgical Sciences, Edinburgh, UK
| | - David Deehan
- Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | | | | | | | - Fares S Haddad
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Charles E Hutchinson
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - James Mason
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Bishal Mohindru
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Chloe E H Scott
- Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- University of Edinburgh Division of Clinical and Surgical Sciences, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Toby O Smith
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - John A Skinner
- Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, Stanmore, UK
| | - Andrew D Toms
- Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Sophie Rees
- Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Martin Underwood
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Andrew Metcalfe
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Patel A, Edwards TC, Jones G, Liddle AD, Cobb J, Garner A. Metabolic equivalent of task scores avoid the ceiling effect observed with conventional patient-reported outcome scores following knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt Open 2023; 4:129-137. [PMID: 37051845 PMCID: PMC10032227 DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.43.bjo-2022-0119.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
The metabolic equivalent of task (MET) score examines patient performance in relation to energy expenditure before and after knee arthroplasty. This study assesses its use in a knee arthroplasty population in comparison with the widely used Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and EuroQol five-dimension index (EQ-5D), which are reported to be limited by ceiling effects. A total of 116 patients with OKS, EQ-5D, and MET scores before, and at least six months following, unilateral primary knee arthroplasty were identified from a database. Procedures were performed by a single surgeon between 2014 and 2019 consecutively. Scores were analyzed for normality, skewness, kurtosis, and the presence of ceiling/floor effects. Concurrent validity between the MET score, OKS, and EQ-5D was assessed using Spearman's rank. Postoperatively the OKS and EQ-5D demonstrated negative skews in distribution, with high kurtosis at six months and one year. The OKS demonstrated a ceiling effect at one year (15.7%) postoperatively. The EQ-5D demonstrated a ceiling effect at six months (30.2%) and one year (39.8%) postoperatively. The MET score did not demonstrate a skewed distribution or ceiling effect either at six months or one year postoperatively. Weak-moderate correlations were noted between the MET score and conventional scores at six months and one year postoperatively. In contrast to the OKS and EQ-5D, the MET score was normally distributed postoperatively with no ceiling effect. It is worth consideration as an arthroplasty outcome measure, particularly for patients with high expectations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arjun Patel
- MSk Lab, Sir Michael Uren Biomedical Engineering Research Hub, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Thomas C Edwards
- MSk Lab, Sir Michael Uren Biomedical Engineering Research Hub, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Gareth Jones
- MSk Lab, Sir Michael Uren Biomedical Engineering Research Hub, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Alexander D Liddle
- MSk Lab, Sir Michael Uren Biomedical Engineering Research Hub, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Justin Cobb
- MSk Lab, Sir Michael Uren Biomedical Engineering Research Hub, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Amy Garner
- MSk Lab, Sir Michael Uren Biomedical Engineering Research Hub, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bagge A, Jensen CB, Mikkelsen M, Gromov K, Nielsen CS, Troelsen A. Obese Patients Achieve Good Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Despite a Lower Preoperative Score. J Arthroplasty 2023; 38:252-258.e2. [PMID: 36096272 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2022] [Revised: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this study, we examined the association between obesity and patient-reported outcome measures after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MUKA), assessed through score changes, Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), and minimal important change (MIC). Second, the association between obesity and early readmissions was examined. METHODS A total of 450 MUKAs (mean body mass index [BMI] 30.3, range, 19.6-53.1), performed from February 2016 to December 2020, were grouped using BMI: <30, 30-34.9, and >34.9. Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and Activity and Participation Questionnaire (APQ) were assessed preoperatively and at 3, 12, and 24 months, postoperatively. The 12-month PASS and MIC were also assessed, defining PASS as OKS = 30, MIC-OKS as change in OKS = 8, and MIC-FJS as change in FJS = 14. RESULTS No significant differences in OKS change were found between BMI groups. After 12 months, patients who had a BMI of 30-34.9 had lower change in FJS (estimate -8.1, 95% CI -14.9 to -1.4) and were less likely to reach PASS (odds ratio 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.7) as well as MIC-FJS (odds ratio 0.5, 95% CI 0.2-0.9). Both obese groups had lower change in APQ after 12 months. Differences in 90-day readmission rates were nonsignificant between groups. CONCLUSION Our findings of no differences in OKS improvement between BMI groups and achieving MIC for BMI > 34.9 suggest good improvements in obese patients despite lower preoperative scores, supporting contemporary indications for MUKA. Lower APQ development and achievement of 12-month PASS may be used when addressing expectations of recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anders Bagge
- Hvidovre Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Clinical Orthopaedic Research Hvidovre (CORH), Kettegård Allé 30, 2650 Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christian B Jensen
- Hvidovre Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Clinical Orthopaedic Research Hvidovre (CORH), Kettegård Allé 30, 2650 Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mette Mikkelsen
- Hvidovre Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Clinical Orthopaedic Research Hvidovre (CORH), Kettegård Allé 30, 2650 Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kirill Gromov
- Hvidovre Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Clinical Orthopaedic Research Hvidovre (CORH), Kettegård Allé 30, 2650 Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christian S Nielsen
- Hvidovre Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Clinical Orthopaedic Research Hvidovre (CORH), Kettegård Allé 30, 2650 Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anders Troelsen
- Hvidovre Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Clinical Orthopaedic Research Hvidovre (CORH), Kettegård Allé 30, 2650 Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
McNamara I, Pomeroy V, Clark AB, Creelman G, Whitehouse C, Wells J, Harry B, Smith TO, High J, Swart AM, Clarke C. Comparison of the Journey II bicruciate stabilised (JII-BCS) and GENESIS II total knee arthroplasty for functional ability and motor impairment: the CAPAbility, blinded, randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e061648. [PMID: 36599639 PMCID: PMC9815016 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine if a newer design of total knee replacement (TKR) (Journey II BCS) produces superior patient-reported outcomes scores and biomechanical outcomes than the older, more established design (Genesis II). SETTING Patients were recruited from an NHS University Hospital between July 2018 and October 2019 with surgery at two sites. Biomechanical and functional capacity measurements were at a University Movement and Exercise Laboratory. PARTICIPANTS 80 participants undergoing single-stage TKR. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomised to receive either the Journey II BCS (JII-BCS) or Genesis II TKR. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome was the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were: OKS Activity and Participation Questionnaire, EQ-5D-5L and UCLA Activity scores, Timed Up and Go Test, 6 min walk test, lower limb kinematics and lower limb muscle activity during walking and balance. RESULTS This study found no difference in the OKS between groups. The OKS scores for the JII-BCS and Genesis II groups were mean (SD) 42.97 (5.21) and 43.13 (5.20) respectively, adjusted effect size 0.35 (-2.01,2.71) p=0.771In secondary outcome measures, the Genesis II group demonstrated a significantly greater walking range-of-movement (50.62 (7.33) vs 46.07 (7.71) degrees, adjusted effect size, 3.14 (0.61,5.68) p=0.02) and higher peak knee flexion angular velocity during walking (mean (SD) 307.69 (38.96) vs 330.38 (41.40) degrees/second, adjusted effect size was 21.75 (4.54,38.96), p=0.01) and better postural control (smaller resultant centre of path length) during quiet standing than the JII-BCS group (mean (SD) 158.14 (65.40) vs 235.48 (176.94) mm, adjusted effect size, 59.91 (-105.98, -13.85) p=0.01.). CONCLUSIONS In this study population, the findings do not support the hypothesis that the Journey II BCS produces a better outcome than the Genesis II for the primary outcome of the OKS at 6 months after surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN32315753.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iain McNamara
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
- University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | | | - Allan B Clark
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | | | | | - J Wells
- University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - B Harry
- Department of clinical neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Toby O Smith
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | | | - Ann Marie Swart
- University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
- Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mills K, Wymenga AB, Bénard MR, Kaptein BL, Defoort KC, van Hellemondt GG, Heesterbeek PJC. Fluoroscopic and radiostereometric analysis of a bicruciate-retaining versus a posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Bone Joint J 2023; 105-B:35-46. [PMID: 36587259 PMCID: PMC9948430 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.105b1.bjj-2022-0465.r2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The aim of this study was to compare a bicruciate-retaining (BCR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a posterior cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA design in terms of kinematics, measured using fluoroscopy and stability as micromotion using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). METHODS A total of 40 patients with end-stage osteoarthritis were included in this randomized controlled trial. All patients performed a step-up and lunge task in front of a monoplane fluoroscope one year postoperatively. Femorotibial contact point (CP) locations were determined at every flexion angle and compared between the groups. RSA images were taken at baseline, six weeks, three, six, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Clinical and functional outcomes were compared postoperatively for two years. RESULTS The BCR-TKA demonstrated a kinematic pattern comparable to the natural knee's screw-home mechanism in the step-up task. In the lunge task, the medial CP of the BCR-TKA was more anterior in the early flexion phase, while laterally the CP was more posterior during the entire movement cycle. The BCR-TKA group showed higher tibial migration. No differences were found for the clinical and functional outcomes. CONCLUSION The BCR-TKA shows a different kinematic pattern in early flexion/late extension compared to the CR-TKA. The difference between both implants is mostly visible in the flexion phase in which the anterior cruciate ligament is effective; however, both designs fail to fully replicate the motion of a natural knee. The higher migration of the BCR-TKA was concerning and highlights the importance of longer follow-up.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(1):35-46.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Mills
- Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands,Correspondence should be sent to Kelly Mills. E-mail:
| | | | | | - Bart L. Kaptein
- Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Defining the minimal clinically important difference for the knee society score following revision total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022; 30:2744-2752. [PMID: 34117505 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06628-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No previous study has evaluated the MCID for revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to identify the MCID for the Knee Society Score (KSS), for revision TKA. METHODS Prospectively collected data from 270 patients who underwent revision TKA at a single institution was analysed. Clinical assessment was performed preoperatively, at 6 months and 2 years using Knee Society Function Score (KSFS) and Knee (KSKS) Scores, and Oxford Knee Score (OKS). MCID was evaluated with a three-pronged methodology, using (1) anchor-based method with linear regression, (2) anchor-based method with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under curve (AUC), (3) distribution-based method with standard deviation (SD). The anchors used were improvement in OKS ≥ 5, patient satisfaction, and implant survivorship following revision TKA. RESULTS The cohort comprised 70% females, with mean age of 69.0 years, that underwent unilateral revision TKA. The MCID determined by anchor-based linear regression method using OKS was 6.3 for KSFS, and 6.6 for KSKS. The MCID determined by anchor-based ROC was between 15 and 20 for KSFS (AUC: satisfaction = 71.8%, survivorship = 61.4%) and between 33 and 34 for KSKS (AUC: satisfaction = 76.3%, survivorship = 67.1%). The MCID determined by distribution-based method of 0.5 SD was 11.7 for KSFS and 11.9 for KSKS. CONCLUSION The MCID of 6.3 points for KSFS, and 6.6 points for KSKS, is a useful benchmark for future studies looking to compare revision against primary TKA outcomes. Clinically, the MCID between 15 and 20 for KSFS and between 33 and 34 for KSKS is a powerful tool for discriminating patients with successful outcomes after revision TKA. Implant survivorship is an objective and naturally dichotomous outcome measure that complements the subjective measure of patient satisfaction, which future MCID studies could consider utilizing as anchors in ROC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II.
Collapse
|
9
|
Edwards TC, Guest B, Garner A, Logishetty K, Liddle AD, Cobb JP. The metabolic equivalent of task score : a useful metric for comparing high-functioning hip arthroplasty patients. Bone Joint Res 2022; 11:317-326. [PMID: 35604337 PMCID: PMC9130675 DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.115.bjr-2021-0445.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS This study investigates the use of the metabolic equivalent of task (MET) score in a young hip arthroplasty population, and its ability to capture additional benefit beyond the ceiling effect of conventional patient-reported outcome measures. METHODS From our electronic database of 751 hip arthroplasty procedures, 221 patients were included. Patients were excluded if they had revision surgery, an alternative hip procedure, or incomplete data either preoperatively or at one-year follow-up. Included patients had a mean age of 59.4 years (SD 11.3) and 54.3% were male, incorporating 117 primary total hip and 104 hip resurfacing arthroplasty operations. Oxford Hip Score (OHS), EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D), and the MET were recorded preoperatively and at one-year follow-up. The distribution was examined reporting the presence of ceiling and floor effects. Validity was assessed correlating the MET with the other scores using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and determining responsiveness. A subgroup of 93 patients scoring 48/48 on the OHS were analyzed by age, sex, BMI, and preoperative MET using the other metrics to determine if differences could be established despite scoring identically on the OHS. RESULTS Postoperatively the OHS and EQ-5D demonstrate considerable negatively skewed distributions with ceiling effects of 41.6% and 53.8%, respectively. The MET was normally distributed postoperatively with no relevant ceiling effect. Weak-to-moderate significant correlations were found between the MET and the other two metrics. In the 48/48 subgroup, no differences were found comparing groups with the EQ-5D, however significantly higher mean MET scores were demonstrated for patients aged < 60 years (12.7 (SD 4.7) vs 10.6 (SD 2.4), p = 0.008), male patients (12.5 (SD 4.5) vs 10.8 (SD 2.8), p = 0.024), and those with preoperative MET scores > 6 (12.6 (SD 4.2) vs 11.0 (SD 3.3), p = 0.040). CONCLUSION The MET is normally distributed in patients following hip arthroplasty, recording levels of activity which are undetectable using the OHS. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(5):317-326.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas C Edwards
- MSk Lab, Imperial College London, Sir Michael Uren Biomedical Engineering Research Hub, London, UK
| | - Brogan Guest
- MSk Lab, Imperial College London, Sir Michael Uren Biomedical Engineering Research Hub, London, UK
| | - Amy Garner
- MSk Lab, Imperial College London, Sir Michael Uren Biomedical Engineering Research Hub, London, UK
| | - Kartik Logishetty
- MSk Lab, Imperial College London, Sir Michael Uren Biomedical Engineering Research Hub, London, UK
| | - Alexander D Liddle
- MSk Lab, Imperial College London, Sir Michael Uren Biomedical Engineering Research Hub, London, UK
| | - Justin P Cobb
- MSk Lab, Imperial College London, Sir Michael Uren Biomedical Engineering Research Hub, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Clement ND, Bardgett M, Galloway S, Baron YJ, Smith K, Weir DJ, Deehan DJ. Robotic- and orthosensor-assisted versus manual (ROAM) total knee replacement: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2022; 23:70. [PMID: 35065657 PMCID: PMC8783439 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05936-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Robotic-arm-assisted knee arthroplasty allows for more accurate component positioning and alignment and is associated with better patient-reported outcomes compared to manually performed jig-based knee arthroplasty. However, what is not known is whether the addition of an intra-articular sensor (VerasenseTM) to aid intraoperative balancing of the total knee replacement (TKR) offers improved functional outcomes for the patient. The purpose of this research is to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing a conventional manual knee replacement to those undergoing TKR using robotic-assisted surgery and the VerasenseTM to optimise alignment and balance the knee joint, respectively, and assess the associated cost economics of such technology. Methods and analysis This randomised controlled trial will include 90 patients with end-stage osteoarthritis of the knee undergoing primary TKR. Patients meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria that consent to be in the study will be randomised at a ratio of 1:1 to either manual TKR (standard of care) or robotic-arm-assisted TKR with VerasenseTM to aid balancing of the knee. The primary objective will be functional improvement at 6 months following surgery between the two groups. The secondary objectives are to compare changes in knee-specific function, joint awareness, patient expectation and fulfilment, satisfaction, pain, stiffness and functional ability, health-related quality of life, cost-effectiveness, and gait patterns between the two groups. Ethical approval was obtained by the Tyne & Wear South Research Ethics Committee, UK. The study is sponsored by the Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Discussion This study will assess whether the improved accuracy of component positioning using the robotic-arm-assisted surgery and the VerasenseTM to aid balancing of the TKR offers improved outcome relative to standard manual jig-based systems that are currently the standard of care. This will be assessed primarily according to knee-specific function, but several other measures will also be assessed including whether these are cost-effective interventions. Trial registration International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number ISRCTN47889316 10.1186/ISRCTN47889316. Registered on 25 November 2019 Date and version for protocol ROAM Protocol V1.0 (13-12-2018) Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05936-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Steven Galloway
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Y Jenny Baron
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Karen Smith
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - David J Weir
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - David J Deehan
- Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
MOHAMMAD HR, JUDGE A, MURRAY DW. A matched comparison of the patient-reported outcome measures of cemented and cementless total knee replacements, based on the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and Isle of Man and England's National PROM collection programme. Acta Orthop 2022; 93:164-170. [PMID: 34981127 PMCID: PMC8815428 DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2021.896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose - Total knee replacement (TKR) can be implanted with or without bone cement. It is currently unknown how the functional outcomes compare. Therefore, we compared the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) of both fixation methods. Patients and methods - We performed a propensitymatched comparison of 14,404 TKRs (7,202 cemented and 7,202 cementless) enrolled in the National Joint Registry and the English National PROMs collection programme. Subgroup analyses were performed in different age groups (1) < 55 years; (2) 55-64 years; (3) 65-74 years; (4) ≥ 75 years. Results - The 6-month postoperative Oxford Knee Score (OKS) was significantly (p < 0.001) higher for cemented TKR (35, SD 9.7) than cementless TKR (34, SD 9.9). The OKS was also significantly higher for the cemented TKR in all age groups, except the 55-64-year group. A significantly higher proportion of cemented TKRs had an excellent OKS (≥ 41) compared with cementless (32% vs. 28%, p < 0.001) and a lower proportion of poor (< 27) scores (19% vs. 22%, p = 0.001). This was also observed for all age subgroups. There were no significant differences in EQ-5D points gained postoperatively between the groups respectively (0.31 vs. 0.30, p = 0.1). Interpretation - Cemented TKRs had a greater proportion of excellent OKS scores and lower proportion of poor scores both overall and across all age groups. However, the absolute differences are small and below the minimally clinically important difference, making both fixation types acceptable. Currently the vast majority of TKRs are cemented and the results from this study suggest that this is appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hasan R MOHAMMAD
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences University of Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford
| | - Andrew JUDGE
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK
| | - David W MURRAY
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences University of Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mohammad HR, Judge A, Murray DW. A matched comparison of the patient-reported outcome measures of 38,716 total and unicompartmental knee replacements: an analysis of linked data from the National Joint Registry of England, Northern Ireland and Isle of Man and England's National PROM collection programme. Acta Orthop 2021; 92:701-708. [PMID: 34309481 PMCID: PMC8635544 DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1956744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose - The surgical treatment options for severe knee osteoarthritis are unicompartmental (UKR) and total knee replacement (TKR). For patients, functional outcomes are more important than revision rate. We compared the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of both implant types using a large PROMs dataset.Patients and methods - We analysed a propensity-matched comparison of 38,716 knee replacements (19,358 UKRs and 19,358 TKRs) enrolled in the National Joint Registry and the English National PROM collection programme. Subgroup analyses were performed in different age groups.Results - 6-month postoperative Oxford Knee Score (OKS) for UKR and TKR were 38 (SD 9.4) and 36 (SD 9.4) respectively. A higher proportion of UKRs had an excellent OKS (≥ 41) compared with TKR (47% vs 36%) and a lower proportion of poor OKS (< 27) scores (13% vs. 16%). The 6-month OKS was higher in all age groups for UKR compared with TKR, with the difference increasing in older age groups. The mean 6-month EQ-5D score was 0.78 (SD 0.25) and 0.75 (SD 0.25) respectively. The improvement in EQ-5D resulting from surgery was higher for UKR than TKR both overall and in all age groups. All comparisons were statistically significant (p < 0.05).Interpretation - UKR had a greater proportion of excellent OKS scores and lower proportion of poor scores than TKR. Additionally, the quality of life was higher for UKR compared with TKR. These factors should be balanced against the higher revision rate for UKR when choosing which procedure to perform.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hasan R Mohammad
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK,Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Level 1 Learning and Research Building, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol, UK,Correspondence: Hasan R MOHAMMAD Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew Judge
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK,Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Level 1 Learning and Research Building, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol, UK
| | - David W Murray
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Withers K, Palmer R, Lewis S, Carolan-Rees G. First steps in PROMs and PREMs collection in Wales as part of the prudent and value-based healthcare agenda. Qual Life Res 2021; 30:3157-3170. [PMID: 33249539 PMCID: PMC7700742 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02711-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients are experts in their own health and should be treated as equal partners in their care. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are an effective way of gathering patient feedback and can facilitate effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis to improve decision making and service improvement. The PROMs, PREMs & Effectiveness Programme was initiated in 2016 and aimed to develop an electronic platform to facilitate collection of PROMs and Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) from secondary care patients across Wales. METHODS We worked with all Health Boards in Wales, the NHS Wales Informatics Service (NWIS), and Cedar (a healthcare technology research centre) to identify and meet technical requirements to develop a platform which is fit for purpose. Patient groups were included throughout the development to gather feedback and for extensive testing. Clinical teams helped identify the most appropriate tools, with licences, translations and electronic formatting issues being managed centrally. RESULTS The developed platform is integrated with patient administration systems minimising the need for manual input, with processes in place to allow automatic collection triggers according to nationally agreed schedules. We have over 30 nationally agreed PROMs 'pathways' with over 110,000 PROMs collected to date. Responses are fed back to clinicians via the electronic patient record and to each health board via feeds to the national data warehouse, making data easily accessible to different teams, maximising use and application. DISCUSSION The national platform has provided a co-ordinated approach to PROMs collection in Wales, offering an effective means of communicating with patients outside the traditional clinic visit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen Withers
- Cedar Healthcare Technology Research Centre, Cedar, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff Medicentre, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4UJ, UK.
| | - Robert Palmer
- Cedar Healthcare Technology Research Centre, Cedar, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff Medicentre, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4UJ, UK
| | - Sally Lewis
- Value Based & Prudent Healthcare, Mamhilad House, Mamhilad Park Estate, Pontypool, NP4 0HZ, UK
| | - Grace Carolan-Rees
- Cedar Healthcare Technology Research Centre, Cedar, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff Medicentre, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4UJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Khow YZ, Liow MHL, Goh GS, Chen JY, Lo NN, Yeo SJ. The oxford knee score minimal clinically important difference for revision total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2021; 32:211-217. [PMID: 34509827 DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2021.08.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2021] [Revised: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is crucial for interpreting meaningful improvements in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). No previous study has evaluated the MCID for the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to propose the OKS MCID for revision TKA. METHODS Prospectively collected data from 191 patients who underwent revision TKA at a single institution was analysed. Clinical assessment was performed preoperatively and at 2 years using OKS and Short-Form 36 Physical Component Score (SF-36 PCS). MCID was evaluated with a three-pronged methodology, using (1) anchor-based method with linear regression, (2) anchor-based method with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under curve (AUC), (3) distribution-based method with standard deviation (SD). The anchors used were improvement in SF-36 PCS ≥ 12, patient satisfaction, and implant survivorship following revision TKA. RESULTS The MCID determined by anchor-based linear regression method using improvements in SF-36 PCS was 4.9 points. The MCID determined by anchor-based ROC was 10.5 points for satisfaction (AUC = 74.8%) and 13.5 points for implant survivorship (AUC = 73.7%). The MCID determined by distribution-based method of 0.5 SD was 4.7. CONCLUSION The proposed MCID for OKS following revision TKA is 4.9 points. Patients who achieve an improvement in OKS of at least 10.5-13.5 points by 2 years are likely to be satisfied with their surgery and not require a subsequent re-revision TKA. Patients undergoing revision TKA should aim for an improvement in OKS of at least 10.5-13.5 points as a target score.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Zhi Khow
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | | | - Graham S Goh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | | | - Ngai Nung Lo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Seng Jin Yeo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Beard DJ, Davies LJ, Cook JA, MacLennan G, Price A, Kent S, Hudson J, Carr A, Leal J, Campbell H, Fitzpatrick R, Arden N, Murray D, Campbell MK. Total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: the TOPKAT RCT. Health Technol Assess 2021; 24:1-98. [PMID: 32369436 DOI: 10.3310/hta24200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Late-stage medial compartment knee osteoarthritis can be treated using total knee replacement or partial (unicompartmental) knee replacement. There is high variation in treatment choice and insufficient evidence to guide selection. OBJECTIVE To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of partial knee replacement compared with total knee replacement in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. The findings are intended to guide surgical decision-making for patients, surgeons and health-care providers. DESIGN This was a randomised, multicentre, pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial that included an expertise component. The target sample size was 500 patients. A web-based randomisation system was used to allocate treatments. SETTING Twenty-seven NHS hospitals (68 surgeons). PARTICIPANTS Patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. INTERVENTIONS The trial compared the overall management strategy of partial knee replacement treatment with total knee replacement treatment. No specified brand or subtype of implant was investigated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The Oxford Knee Score at 5 years was the primary end point. Secondary outcomes included activity scores, global health measures, transition items, patient satisfaction (Lund Score) and complications (including reoperation, revision and composite 'failure' - defined by minimal Oxford Knee Score improvement and/or reoperation). Cost-effectiveness was also assessed. RESULTS A total of 528 patients were randomised (partial knee replacement, n = 264; total knee replacement, n = 264). The follow-up primary outcome response rate at 5 years was 88% and both operations had good outcomes. There was no significant difference between groups in mean Oxford Knee Score at 5 years (difference 1.04, 95% confidence interval -0.42 to 2.50). An area under the curve analysis of the Oxford Knee Score at 5 years showed benefit in favour of partial knee replacement over total knee replacement, but the difference was within the minimal clinically important difference [mean 36.6 (standard deviation 8.3) (n = 233), mean 35.1 (standard deviation 9.1) (n = 231), respectively]. Secondary outcome measures showed consistent patterns of benefit in the direction of partial knee replacement compared with total knee replacement although most differences were small and non-significant. Patient-reported improvement (transition) and reflection (would you have the operation again?) showed statistically significant superiority for partial knee replacement only, but both of these variables could be influenced by the lack of blinding. The frequency of reoperation (including revision) by treatment received was similar for both groups: 22 out of 245 for partial knee replacement and 28 out of 269 for total knee replacement patients. Revision rates at 5 years were 10 out of 245 for partial knee replacement and 8 out of 269 for total knee replacement. There were 28 'failures' of partial knee replacement and 38 'failures' of total knee replacement (as defined by composite outcome). Beyond 1 year, partial knee replacement was cost-effective compared with total knee replacement, being associated with greater health benefits (measured using quality-adjusted life-years) and lower health-care costs, reflecting lower costs of the index surgery and subsequent health-care use. LIMITATIONS It was not possible to blind patients in this study and there was some non-compliance with the allocated treatment interventions. Surgeons providing partial knee replacement were relatively experienced with the procedure. CONCLUSIONS Both total knee replacement and partial knee replacement are effective, offer similar clinical outcomes and have similar reoperation and complication rates. Some patient-reported measures of treatment approval were significantly higher for partial knee replacement than for total knee replacement. Partial knee replacement was more cost-effective (more effective and cost saving) than total knee replacement at 5 years. FUTURE WORK Further (10-year) follow-up is in progress to assess the longer-term stability of these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN03013488 and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01352247. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 20. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Beard
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Loretta J Davies
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jonathan A Cook
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Graeme MacLennan
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Andrew Price
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Seamus Kent
- Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jemma Hudson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Andrew Carr
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jose Leal
- Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Helen Campbell
- Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ray Fitzpatrick
- Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nigel Arden
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David Murray
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Te Molder MEM, Vriezekolk JE, Bénard MR, Heesterbeek PJC. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and construct validity of the Dutch Oxford Knee Score - Activity and Participation Questionnaire. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22:700. [PMID: 34404359 PMCID: PMC8369625 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04521-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) tend to be younger and tend to receive TKA at an earlier stage compared to 20 years ago. The Oxford Knee Score – Activity and Participation (OKS-APQ) questionnaire evaluates higher levels of activity and participation, reflecting activity patterns of younger or more active people. The purpose of this study was to translate the OKS-APQ questionnaire into Dutch, and to evaluate its measurement properties in pre- and postoperative TKA patients. Methods The OKS-APQ was translated and adapted according to the forward–backward translation multi step approach and tested for clinimetric quality. Floor and ceiling effects, structural validity, construct validity, internal consistency and test–retest reliability were evaluated using COSMIN quality criteria. The OKS-APQ, the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), the Short Form-36 (SF-36), a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) were assessed in 131 patients (72 preoperative and 59 postoperative TKA patients), and the OKS-APQ was administered twice in 50 patients (12 preoperative and 38 postoperative TKA patients), after an interval of minimal 2 weeks. Results Floor effects were observed in preoperative patients. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) indicated a good fit of a 1-factor model by the following indices: (Comparative Fit Index (CFI): 0.97, Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI): 0.96 and Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR): 0.03). Construct validity was supported as > 75% of the hypotheses were confirmed. Internal consistency (Cronbach α’s from 0.81 to 0.95) was good in the pooled and separate pre- and postoperative samples and test–retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) from 0.63 – 0.85) were good in postoperative patients and moderate in preoperative patients. The standard Error of Measurements (SEMs) ranged from 8.5 – 12.2 and the Smallest Detectable Changes in individuals (SDCind) ranged from 23.5 – 34.0 (on a scale from 0 to 100). Conclusions Preliminary findings suggest that the Dutch version of the OKS-APQ is reliable and valid for a Dutch postoperative TKA patient sample. However, in a preoperative TKA sample, the OKS-APQ seems less suitable, because of floor effects and lower test–retest reliability. The Dutch version of the OKS-APQ can be used alongside the OKS to discriminate among levels of activity and participation in postoperative patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malou E M Te Molder
- Department of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, PO Box 9011, 6500 GM, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. .,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Johanna E Vriezekolk
- Department of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, PO Box 9011, 6500 GM, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Menno R Bénard
- Department of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, PO Box 9011, 6500 GM, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Petra J C Heesterbeek
- Department of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, PO Box 9011, 6500 GM, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Panchani SK, Divecha HM, Lafferty R, Pavlou G, Oakley J, Shaw D, Chitre A, Wynn Jones H, Raut V, Smith R, Gambhir A, Board T. Early Functional Outcomes After Evolutionary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Is New Always Better? JB JS Open Access 2021; 6:JBJSOA-D-21-00016. [PMID: 34337284 PMCID: PMC8318648 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.oa.21.00016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Total knee replacement (TKR) designs continue to evolve with the aim of improving patient outcomes; however, there remains a significant patient dissatisfaction rate. We report the early functional outcomes of an evolutionary knee design in the context of a single-blinded, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Jez Oakley
- Wrightington Hospital, Wigan, United Kingdom
| | - Debbie Shaw
- Wrightington Hospital, Wigan, United Kingdom
| | - Amol Chitre
- Wrightington Hospital, Wigan, United Kingdom
| | | | - Videsh Raut
- Wrightington Hospital, Wigan, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Tim Board
- Wrightington Hospital, Wigan, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chen C, Wang W, Wu H, Gao A, Qiu Y, Weng W, Price A. Cross-cultural translation and validation of the Chinese Oxford Knee Score and the Activity and Participation Questionnaire. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2021; 28:2309499020910668. [PMID: 32301381 DOI: 10.1177/2309499020910668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To cross-culturally translate and validate the Chinese versions of the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the Activity and Participation Questionnaire (APQ) in patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis who are also candidates for knee replacement. METHODS The Chinese version of the OKS and APQ was completed by standard forward-backward translation and adaption. The feasibility was validated by a pretest in 30 patients. The final version together with the Short Form-36 (SF-36), EQ-5D, and EQ visual analog scale were assessed in 150 patients, and the OKS and APQ were repeated in 30 patients after a 2-week interval. The psychometric properties of the OKS and APQ were evaluated for test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), internal consistency using Cronbach's α, and construct validity using Spearman's correlation analysis. RESULTS All patients were able to understand and complete both the OKS and APQ without difficulty (i.e. no missing data). The ICCs were 0.959 for the OKS, 0.956 for the APQ for total scores, and >0.7 for each item. Cronbach's α was greater than 0.7, and the corrected item-total correlation was greater than 0.4 for each item of both questionnaires. The OKS and APQ showed better correlations with questions from the pain and function domains than with those from the mental status domains of the SF-36 and EQ-5D. No floor or ceiling effect was identified in either questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS The Chinese versions of the OKS and APQ are easy to understand and complete and showed good reliability and validity. They can be used to assess patient-reported outcomes after undergoing knee replacement in mainland China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Chen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.,Department of Orthopaedics, Suqian First Hospital, Suqian, China
| | - Weijun Wang
- Department of Orthopaedics, Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.,Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Hao Wu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China
| | - Anqi Gao
- Department of Orthopaedics, Suqian First Hospital, Suqian, China
| | - Yong Qiu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China
| | - Wenjie Weng
- Department of Orthopaedics, Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China
| | - Andrew Price
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wang Y, Yin M, Zhu S, Chen X, Zhou H, Qian W. Patient-reported outcome measures used in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint Res 2021; 10:203-217. [PMID: 33734821 PMCID: PMC7998066 DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.103.bjr-2020-0268.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are being used increasingly in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We conducted a systematic review aimed at identifying psychometrically sound PROMs by appraising their measurement properties. Studies concerning the development and/or evaluation of the measurement properties of PROMs used in a TKA population were systematically retrieved via PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus. Ratings for methodological quality and measurement properties were conducted according to updated COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology. Of the 155 articles on 34 instruments included, nine PROMs met the minimum requirements for psychometric validation and can be recommended to use as measures of TKA outcome: Oxford Knee Score (OKS); OKS-Activity and Participation Questionnaire (OKS-APQ); 12-item short form Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS-12); KOOS Physical function Short form (KOOS-PS); Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index-Total Knee Replacement function short form (WOMAC-TKR); Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS); Forgotten Joint Score (FJS); Patient's Knee Implant Performance (PKIP); and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score. The pain and function subscales in WOMAC, as well as the pain, function, and quality of life subscales in KOOS, were validated psychometrically as standalone subscales instead of as whole instruments. However, none of the included PROMs have been validated for all measurement properties. Thus, further studies are still warranted to evaluate those PROMs. Use of the other 25 scales and subscales should be tempered until further studies validate their measurement properties. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(3):203-217.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiou Wang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China
| | - Meihua Yin
- Institute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shibai Zhu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China
| | - Xi Chen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China
| | - Hongru Zhou
- Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wenwei Qian
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Return to Work Following Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: The Effect of Patient Intent and Preoperative Work Status. J Arthroplasty 2021; 36:434-441. [PMID: 32873451 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ability of total knee and hip arthroplasty (TKA/THA) to facilitate return to work (RTW) when it is the patient's preoperative intent to do so remains unclear. We aimed at determining whether TKA/THA facilitated RTW in patients of working age who intended to return. METHODS This is a prospective cohort study of 173 consecutive patients <65 years of age, undergoing unilateral TKA (n = 82: median age 58; range, 39-65; 36 [43.9%] male) or THA (n = 91: median age 59; range, 34-65; 42 [46.2%] male) during 2018. Oxford knee/hip scores, Oxford-Activity and Participation Questionnaire, and EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ-5D) scores were measured preoperatively and at 1 year when an employment questionnaire was also completed. RESULTS Of patients who intended to RTW, 44 of 52 (84.6%) RTW by 1 year following TKA (at mean 14.8 ± 8.4 weeks) and 53 of 60 (88.3%) following THA (at mean 13.6 ± 7.5 weeks). Failure to RTW despite intent was associated with job physicality for TKA (P = .004) and negative preoperative EQ-5D for THA (P = .01). In patients unable to work before surgery due to joint disease, fewer RTW: 4 of 21 (19.0%) after TKA; and 6 of 17 (35.3%) after THA. Preoperative Oxford knee score >18.5 predicted RTW with 74% sensitivity (P < .001); preoperative Oxford hip score >19.5 predicted RTW with 75% sensitivity (P < .001). Preoperative EQ-5D indices were similarly predictive (P < .001). CONCLUSION In this United Kingdom study, preoperative intent to RTW was the most powerful predictor of actual RTW following TKA/THA. Where patients intend to RTW following TKA/THA, 85% RTW following TKA and 88% following THA.
Collapse
|
21
|
Clement ND, Afzal I, Demetriou C, Deehan DJ, Field RE, Kader DF. The preoperative Oxford Knee Score is an independent predictor of achieving a postoperative ceiling score after total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2020; 102-B:1519-1526. [PMID: 33135448 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.102b11.bjj-2019-1327.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Aims The primary aim of this study was to assess whether the postoperative Oxford Knee Score (OKS) demonstrated a ceiling effect at one and/or two years after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The secondary aim was to identify preoperative independent predictors for patients that achieved a ceiling score after TKA. Methods A retrospective cohort of 5,857 patients undergoing a primary TKA were identified from an established arthroplasty database. Patient demographics, body mass index (BMI), OKS, and EuroQoL five-dimension (EQ-5D) general health scores were collected preoperatively and at one and two years postoperatively. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent preoperative predictors of patients achieving postoperative ceiling scores. Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to identify a preoperative OKS that predicted a postoperative ceiling score. Results The ceiling effect was 4.6% (n = 272) at one year which increased significantly (odds ratio (OR) 40.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 30.4 to 53.3; p < 0.001) to 6.2% (n = 363) at two years, when defined as those with a maximal score of 48 points. However, when the ceiling effect was defined as an OKS of 44 points or more, this increased to 26.3% (n = 1,540) at one year and further to 29.8% (n = 1,748) at two years (OR 21.6, 95% CI 18.7 to 25.1; p < 0.001). A preoperative OKS of 23 or more and 22 or more were predictive of achieving a postoperative ceiling OKS at one and two years when defined as a maximal score or a score of 44 or more, respectively. Conclusion The postoperative OKS demonstrated a small ceiling effect when defined by a maximal score, but when defined by a postoperative OKS of 44 or more the ceiling effect was moderate and failed to meet standards. The preoperative OKS was an independent predictor of achieving a ceiling score. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(11):1519–1526.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas D. Clement
- Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Orthopaedic Surgery, South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, UK
| | - Irrum Afzal
- Research Department, South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, UK
| | - Charis Demetriou
- Research Department, South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, UK
| | - David J. Deehan
- Department of Orthopaedics, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Richard E. Field
- Orthopaedic Surgery, South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, UK
- St George's University of London, London, UK
| | - Deiary F. Kader
- Orthopaedic Surgery, South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, UK
- Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hoorntje A, Waterval-Witjes S, Koenraadt KL, Kuijer PPF, Blankevoort L, Kerkhoffs GM, van Geenen RC. Goal Attainment Scaling Rehabilitation Improves Satisfaction with Work Activities for Younger Working Patients After Knee Arthroplasty: Results from the Randomized Controlled ACTION Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020; 102:1445-1453. [PMID: 32453116 PMCID: PMC7508269 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.19.01471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Knee arthroplasty (KA) is increasingly performed in relatively young, active patients. This heterogeneous patient population often has high expectations, including work resumption and performance of knee-demanding leisure-time activities. Goal attainment scaling (GAS) may personalize rehabilitation by using patient-specific, activity-oriented rehabilitation goals. Since unmet expectations are a leading cause of dissatisfaction after KA, personalized rehabilitation may improve patient satisfaction. We hypothesized that, compared with standard rehabilitation, GAS-based rehabilitation would result in younger, active patients having higher satisfaction regarding activities after KA. METHODS We performed a single-center randomized controlled trial. Eligible patients were <65 years of age, working outside the home, and scheduled to undergo unicompartmental or total KA. The required sample size was 120 patients. Using GAS, patients developed personal activity goals with a physiotherapist preoperatively. These goals were used to monitor patients' goal attainment and provide goal-specific feedback during postoperative outpatient rehabilitation. Standard rehabilitation consisted of regular outpatient physiotherapy visits. The primary outcome measures were visual analogue scale (VAS) scores (scale of 0 to 100) for satisfaction regarding activities of daily living and work and leisure-time activities 1 year postoperatively, which were analyzed using generalized estimating equation models. RESULTS Patient satisfaction with work activities was significantly higher in the GAS group (β = 10.7 points, 98% confidence interval [CI] = 2.0 to 19.4 points) than in the control group. Patient satisfaction with activities of daily living and leisure-time activities did not differ between groups. We found no differences in VAS satisfaction scores between unicompartmental KA and total KA. CONCLUSIONS Personalized, goal-specific rehabilitation using GAS resulted in higher patient satisfaction with work activities, compared with standard rehabilitation, 1 year after KA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Hoorntje
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Foundation for Orthopaedic Research Care and Education, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands,Email address for A. Hoorntje:
| | - Suzanne Waterval-Witjes
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Foundation for Orthopaedic Research Care and Education, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands,Personalized Knee Care, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Koen L.M. Koenraadt
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Foundation for Orthopaedic Research Care and Education, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - P. Paul F.M. Kuijer
- Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Leendert Blankevoort
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gino M.M.J. Kerkhoffs
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger C.I. van Geenen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Foundation for Orthopaedic Research Care and Education, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Clarke C, Pomeroy V, Clark A, Creelman G, Hancock N, Horton S, Killett A, Mann C, Payerne E, Toms A, Roberts G, Smith T, Swart AM, McNamara I. CAPAbility: comparison of the JOURNEY II Bi-Cruciate Stabilised and GENESIS II total knee arthroplasty in performance and functional ability: protocol of a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2020; 21:222. [PMID: 32093769 PMCID: PMC7041243 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-4143-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2019] [Accepted: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Osteoarthritis of the knee is a common condition that is expected to rise in the next two decades leading to an associated increase in total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. Although there is little debate regarding the safety and efficacy of modern TKR, up to 20% of patients report poor functional outcomes following surgery. This study will investigate the functional outcome of two TKRs; the JOURNEY II Bi-Cruciate Stabilised knee arthroplasty, a newer knee prosthesis designed to provide guided motion and improve knee kinematics by more closely approximating a normal knee, and the GENESIS II, a proven existing design. Aim To compare the change in Patient-reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) scores of the JOURNEY II BCS and the GENESIS II from pre-operation to 6 months post operation. Methods CAPAbility is a pragmatic, blinded, two-arm parallel, randomised controlled trial recruiting patients with primary osteoarthritis due to have unilateral TKR surgery across two UK hospitals. Eligible participants (n = 80) will be randomly allocated to receive either the JOURNEY II or the GENESIS II BCS knee prosthesis. Baseline measures will be taken prior to surgery. Patients will be followed at 1 week, 6 to 8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively. The primary outcome is the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) at 6 months post-operatively. Secondary outcomes include: other PROMs, biomechanical, radiological (computerised tomography, (CT)), clinical efficacy and safety outcomes. An embedded qualitative study will also investigate patients’ perspectives via interview pre and post surgery on variables known to affect the outcome of TKR surgery. A sub-sample (n = 30) will have additional in-depth interviews to explore the themes identified. The surgeons’ perspectives on the operation will be investigated by a group interview after all participants have undergone surgery. Discussion This trial will evaluate two generations of TKR using PROMS, kinematic and radiological analyses and qualitative outcomes from the patient perspective. Trial registration International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number Registration, ID: ISRCTN32315753. Registered on 12 December 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celia Clarke
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
| | - Valerie Pomeroy
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Allan Clark
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | | | - Nicola Hancock
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Simon Horton
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Anne Killett
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Charles Mann
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | | | - Andoni Toms
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.,Norwich Radiology Academy, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | | | - Toby Smith
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.,Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ann Marie Swart
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Iain McNamara
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.,Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sansone V, Fennema P, Applefield RC, Marchina S, Ronco R, Pascale W, Pascale V. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Italian language Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) as an outcome measure for total knee arthroplasty in an Italian population. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2020; 21:23. [PMID: 31926561 PMCID: PMC6955087 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2985-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 12/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background With ever-increasing numbers of patients undergoing elective total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and as TKA is performed in increasingly younger patients, patient demands and expectations have also increased. With improved patient outcomes, new PROMs with heightened discriminatory power in well-performing patients are needed. The present study aimed to translate and validate the Italian version of the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) as a tool for evaluating pre-operative through longitudinal post-operative outcomes in an Italian population. Methods In this prospective study, patients with unilateral osteoarthritis, undergoing TKA surgery between May 2015 and December 2017 were recruited to participate in the study. The FJS-12 and WOMAC were collected pre-operatively and at six and 12 months post-operatively. According to the COSMIN checklist, reliability, internal consistency, validity, responsiveness, effect size, and ceiling effects and floor effects were evaluated. Results One hundred twenty patients completed the study, 66 of which participated in the evaluation of test-retest reliability. Good test-retest reliability was found (ICC = 0.90). The FJS-12 also showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.81). Construct validity with the WOMAC, as a measure of the Pearson correlation coefficient, was moderate (r = 0.45 pre-operatively; r = 0.46 at 6 months and r = 0.42 at 12 months post-operatively). From six to 12 months, the change was slightly greater for the WOMAC than for the FJS-12 patients (effect size d = 0.94; d = 0.75, respectively). At 12-months follow-up, the ceiling effects reflecting the maximum score were 12% for the FJS-12 and 6% for the WOMAC; however, scores within 10% of the maximum score were comprised 30% of the FJS-12 scores and 59% for the WOMAC. Conclusion The Italian FJS-12 demonstrated strong measurement properties in terms of reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity in TKA patients. Furthermore, a more detailed look at ceiling effects shows a superior discriminatory capacity when compared to the WOMAC at 12-months follow-up, particularly in better-performing patients. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov NCT03805490. Registered 18 January 2019 (retrospectively registered).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerio Sansone
- Department of Orthopaedics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono, 7, 20122, Milan, MI, Italy.,IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi, 4, 20161, Milan, MI, Italy
| | - Peter Fennema
- AMR Advanced Medical Research GmbH, Männedorf, Switzerland
| | - Rachel C Applefield
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi, 4, 20161, Milan, MI, Italy
| | - Stefano Marchina
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi, 4, 20161, Milan, MI, Italy
| | - Raffaella Ronco
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Milano-Bicocca, U7, stanza 2064, 20126, Milan, Italy
| | - Walter Pascale
- Department of Orthopaedics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono, 7, 20122, Milan, MI, Italy.,IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi, 4, 20161, Milan, MI, Italy
| | - Valerio Pascale
- Department of Orthopaedics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono, 7, 20122, Milan, MI, Italy. .,IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi, 4, 20161, Milan, MI, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kappel A, Laursen M, Nielsen PT, Odgaard A. Relationship between outcome scores and knee laxity following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Acta Orthop 2019; 90:46-52. [PMID: 30569797 PMCID: PMC6367957 DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1554400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose - Instability following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is, according to all national registries, one of the major failure mechanisms leading to revision surgery. However, the range of soft-tissue laxity that favors both pain relief and optimal knee function following TKA remains unclear. We reviewed current evidence on the relationship between instrumented knee laxity measured postoperatively and outcome scores following primary TKA. Patients and methods - We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify relevant studies, which were cross-referenced using Web of Science. Results - 14 eligible studies were identified; all were methodologically similar. Both sagittal and coronal laxity measurement were reported; 6 studies reported on measurement in both extension and flexion. In knee extension from 0° to 30° none of 11 studies could establish statistically significant association between laxity and outcome scores. In flexion from 60° to 90° 6 of 9 studies found statistically significant association. Favorable results were reported for posterior cruciate retaining (CR) knees with sagittal laxity between 5 and 10 mm at 75-80° and for knees with medial coronal laxity below 4° in 80-90° of flexion. Interpretation - In order to improve outcome following TKA careful measuring and adjusting of ligament laxity intraoperatively seems important. Future studies using newer outcome scores supplemented by performance-based scores may complement current evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Kappel
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery/Clinical Institute, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; ,Correspondence:
| | - Mogens Laursen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery/Clinical Institute, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark;
| | - Poul T Nielsen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery/Clinical Institute, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark;
| | - Anders Odgaard
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev-Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Metcalfe AJ, Ahearn N, Hassaballa MA, Parsons N, Ackroyd CE, Murray JR, Robinson JR, Eldridge JD, Porteous AJ. The Avon patellofemoral joint arthroplasty: two- to 18-year results of a large single-centre cohort. Bone Joint J 2018; 100-B:1162-1167. [PMID: 30168762 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.100b9.bjj-2018-0174.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Aims This study reports on the medium- to long-term implant survivorship and patient-reported outcomes for the Avon patellofemoral joint (PFJ) arthroplasty. Patients and Methods A total of 558 Avon PFJ arthroplasties in 431 patients, with minimum two-year follow-up, were identified from a prospective database. Patient-reported outcomes and implant survivorship were analyzed, with follow-up of up to 18 years. Results Outcomes were recorded for 483 implants (368 patients), representing an 86% follow-up rate. The median postoperative Oxford Knee Score (0 to 48 scale) was 35 (interquartile range (IQR) 25.5 to 43) and the median Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC, 0 to 100 scale) was 35 (IQR 25 to 53) at two years. There were 105 revisions, 61 (58%) for progression of osteoarthritis. All documented revisions were to primary knee systems without augmentation. The implant survival rate was 77.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 72.4 to 81.7, number at risk 204) at ten years and 67.4% (95% CI 72.4 to 81.7 number at risk 45) at 15 years. Regression analysis of explanatory data variable showed that cases performed in the last nine years had improved survival compared with the first nine years of the cohort, but the individual operating surgeon had the strongest effect on survivorship. Conclusion Satisfactory long-term results can be obtained with the Avon PFJ arthroplasty, with maintenance of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), satisfactory survival, and low rates of loosening and wear. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1162-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J Metcalfe
- Warwick Medical School, Warwick University, Coventry, UK
| | - N Ahearn
- The Avon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - M A Hassaballa
- The Avon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - N Parsons
- Warwick Medical School, Warwick University, Coventry, UK
| | - C E Ackroyd
- The Avon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - J R Murray
- The Avon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - J R Robinson
- The Avon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - J D Eldridge
- The Avon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - A J Porteous
- The Avon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hamilton DF, Loth FL, MacDonald DJ, Giesinger K, Patton JT, Simpson AH, Howie CR, Giesinger JM. Treatment Success Following Joint Arthroplasty: Defining Thresholds for the Oxford Hip and Knee Scores. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33:2392-2397. [PMID: 29691169 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2018] [Revised: 03/21/2018] [Accepted: 03/22/2018] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcome scores are the mainstay method for quantifying success following arthroplasty. However, it is unclear when a "successful outcome" is achieved. We calculated threshold values for the Oxford Hip and Knee Score (OHS and OKS) representing achievement of a successful treatment at 12-month follow-up. METHODS Questionnaires were administered to patients undergoing total hip (THA) or knee (TKA) arthroplasty before and 12 months after surgery alongside questions assessing key aspects of treatment success. A composite success criterion was used to perform receiver operator characteristic analysis. Thresholds providing maximum sensitivity and specificity were determined for the total sample and subgroups defined by presurgery scores. RESULTS Data were available for 3203 THA and 2742 TKA patients. Applying the composite treatment success criterion, 67.3% of the TKA and 77.6% of the THA sample reported treatment success. Accuracy for predicting treatment success was high for the OHS and OKS (both areas under the curve, 0.87). For the OHS, a threshold value of 37.5 points showed highest sensitivity and specificity in the total sample, while for the OKS the optimal threshold was 32.5 points. Depending on presurgery scores, optimal thresholds varied between 32.5 and 38.5 for the OHS and 28.5 and 36.5 for the OKS. CONCLUSION This is the first study to apply a composite "success" anchor to the OHS and OKS to evaluate outcome following total joint arthroplasty. Notably fewer patients report a "successful outcome" using a composite outcome threshold than report being "satisfied."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David F Hamilton
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Fanny L Loth
- University of Innsbruck, Faculty of Psychology and Sport Science, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Deborah J MacDonald
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | | - James T Patton
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - A Hamish Simpson
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Colin R Howie
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Johannes M Giesinger
- Innsbruck Institute of Patient-centered Outcome Research (IIPCOR), Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Harris K, Lim CR, Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Beard DJ, Price AJ. The Oxford knee score and its subscales do not exhibit a ceiling or a floor effect in knee arthroplasty patients: an analysis of the National Health Service PROMs data set. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25:2736-2742. [PMID: 26519187 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3788-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2014] [Accepted: 09/10/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In this study, we examined whether the OKS demonstrated a floor or a ceiling effect when used to measure the outcome of knee replacement surgery in a large national cohort. METHODS NHS PROMs database, containing pre- to 6 month post-operative OKS on 72,154 patients, mean age 69 (SD 9.4), undergoing knee replacement surgery, was examined to establish the proportion of patients achieving top or bottom OKS values pre- and post-operatively. RESULTS Pre-operatively, none of patients achieved the maximum/'best' (48) and minimum (0) scores. Post-operatively, no patients (0 %) achieved the minimum/'worst' score, but the percentage achieving the maximum score increased to 2.7 %. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that the highest post-operative overall ceiling percentage was 3 %, in a subgroup of patients between 60 and 79 years of age and 13.7 % in a group of patients who had a pre-operative OKS above 41. Furthermore, 10.8 % of patients achieved the top post-operative OKS-PCS and 4.7 % top post-operative OKS-FCS. CONCLUSION Based on NHS PROMs data, the OKS does not exhibit a ceiling or floor effect overall, or for both its pain and function subscales, and remains a valid measure of outcomes for patients undergoing TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Large-scale retrospective observations study, Level II.
Collapse
|
29
|
A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32:1688-1697.e7. [PMID: 28162839 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2016] [Revised: 12/15/2016] [Accepted: 12/27/2016] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While clinical research on total knee arthroplasty (TKA) outcomes is prevalent in the literature, studies often have poor methodological and reporting quality. A high-quality patient-reported outcome instrument is reliable, valid, and responsive. Many studies evaluate these properties, but none have done so with a systematic and accepted method. The objectives of this study were to identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for TKA, and to critically appraise, compare, and summarize their psychometric properties using accepted methods. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and SPORTDiscus were systematically searched for articles with the following inclusion criteria: publication before December 2014, English language, non-generic PRO, and evaluation in the TKA population. Methodological quality and evidence of psychometric properties were assessed with the COnsensus-based standards for the selection of health Status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist and criteria for psychometric evidence proposed by the COSMIN group and Terwee et al. RESULTS One-hundred fifteen studies on 32 PROMs were included in this review. Only the Work, Osteoarthritis or joint-Replacement Questionnaire, the Oxford Knee Score, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index had 4 or more properties with positive evidence. CONCLUSION Most TKA PROMs have limited evidence for their psychometric properties. Although not all the properties were studied, the Work, Osteoarthritis or joint-Replacement Questionnaire, with the highest overall ratings, could be a useful PROM for evaluating patients undergoing TKA. The methods and reporting of this literature can improve by following accepted guidelines.
Collapse
|
30
|
Witjes S, van Geenen RCI, Koenraadt KLM, van der Hart CP, Blankevoort L, Kerkhoffs GMMJ, Kuijer PPFM. Expectations of younger patients concerning activities after knee arthroplasty: are we asking the right questions? Qual Life Res 2017; 26:403-417. [PMID: 27492606 PMCID: PMC5288419 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-016-1380-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/26/2016] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Indications for total and unicondylar knee arthroplasty (KA) have expanded to younger patients, in which Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) often show ceiling effects. This might be due to higher expectations. Our aims were to explore expectations of younger patients concerning activities in daily life, work and leisure time after KA and to assess to what extent PROMs meet and evaluate these activities of importance. METHODS Focus groups were performed among osteoarthritis (OA) patients <65 years awaiting KA, in which they indicated what activities they expected to perform better in daily life, work and leisure time after KA. Additionally, 28 activities of daily life, 17 of work and 27 of leisure time were depicted from seven PROMS, which were rated on importance, frequency and bother. A total score, representing motivation for surgery, was also calculated. RESULTS Data saturation was reached after six focus groups including 37 patients. Younger OA patients expect to perform better on 16 activities after KA, including high-impact leisure time activities. From the PROMs, daily life and work activities were rated high in both importance and motivation for surgery, but for leisure time activities importance varied highly between patients. All seven PROMs score activities of importance, but no single PROM incorporates all activities rated important. CONCLUSION Younger patients expect to perform better on many activities of daily life, work and leisure time after KA, and often at demanding levels. To measure outcomes of younger patients, we suggest using PROMs that include work and leisure time activities besides daily life activities, in which preferably scored activities can be individualized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne Witjes
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Foundation FORCE (Foundation for Orthopedic Research Care & Education), Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- ACES (Academic Center for Evidence - based Sports medicine), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- ACHSS (Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger C I van Geenen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Foundation FORCE (Foundation for Orthopedic Research Care & Education), Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Koen L M Koenraadt
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Foundation FORCE (Foundation for Orthopedic Research Care & Education), Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Cor P van der Hart
- ACES (Academic Center for Evidence - based Sports medicine), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Bergman Clinics, Naarden, The Netherlands
| | - Leendert Blankevoort
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- ACES (Academic Center for Evidence - based Sports medicine), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- ACHSS (Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- ORCA (Orthopaedic Research Center Amsterdam), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- ACES (Academic Center for Evidence - based Sports medicine), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- ACHSS (Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P Paul F M Kuijer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Bergman Clinics, Naarden, The Netherlands.
- Academic Medical Centre, Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hamilton DF, Loth FL, Giesinger JM, Giesinger K, MacDonald DJ, Patton JT, Simpson AHRW, Howie CR. Validation of the English language Forgotten Joint Score-12 as an outcome measure for total hip and knee arthroplasty in a British population. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B:218-224. [DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.99b2.bjj-2016-0606.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2016] [Accepted: 10/13/2016] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Aims To validate the English language Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) as a tool to evaluate the outcome of hip and knee arthroplasty in a United Kingdom population. Patients and Methods All patients undergoing surgery between January and August 2014 were eligible for inclusion. Prospective data were collected from 205 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 231 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Outcomes were assessed with the FJS-12 and the Oxford Hip and Knee Scores (OHS, OKS) pre-operatively, then at six and 12 months post-operatively. Internal consistency, convergent validity, effect size, relative validity and ceiling effects were determined. Results Data for the TKA and THA patients showed high internal consistency for the FJS-12 (Cronbach α = 0.97 in TKAs, 0.98 in THAs). Convergent validity with the Oxford Scores was high (r = 0.85 in TKAs, r = 0.79 for THAs). From six to 12 months, the change was higher for the FJS-12 than for the OHS in THA patients (effect size d = 0.21 versus -0.03). Ceiling effects at one-year follow-up were low for the FJS-12 with just 3.9% (TKA) and 8.8% (THA) of patients achieving the best possible score. Conclusion The FJS-12 has strong measurement properties in terms of validity, internal consistency and sensitivity to change in TKA and THA patients. Low ceiling effects and good relative validity allow the monitoring of longer term outcomes, particularly in well-performing groups after total joint arthroplasty. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:218–24.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - F. L. Loth
- Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - K. Giesinger
- Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St
Gallen, Switzerland
| | | | | | - A. H. R. W. Simpson
- Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51
Little France Crescent, Old Dalkeith Road, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Maempel JF, Clement ND, Brenkel IJ, Walmsley PJ. Range of movement correlates with the Oxford knee score after total knee replacement: A prediction model and validation. Knee 2016; 23:511-6. [PMID: 26875051 DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2014] [Revised: 12/17/2015] [Accepted: 01/11/2016] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient reported outcome measures are widely used in the evaluation of outcomes after Total Knee Replacement (TKR) in joint registries and large studies. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between the Oxford knee score (OKS) and range of motion (ROM) after TKR, and to construct and validate prediction models of ROM from the measured OKS. METHODS Eight hundred sixty patients reviewed five years postoperatively and 273 patients reviewed nine to 10 years postoperatively completed an OKS. Of these, 808 (94%) and 226 (83%) patients, respectively, had a complete dataset (knee extension and ROM) and formed the study cohort. RESULTS Regression analysis demonstrated a significant correlation between the OKS and ROM (r=0.38, p<0.001) after adjusting for other confounding variables (age, sex, body mass index, and knee extension). A prediction model was constructed and validated using a second cohort of 226 patients at nine to 10 years after their TKR. Intraclass correlation demonstrated good reliability (r=0.60, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.69) between predicted and actual measured ROM for this group. However, when the OKS is used in isolation the reliability of the predicted ROM is diminished (intraclass correlation r=0.41, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.55). CONCLUSIONS The OKS is an independent predictor of ROM after TKR. It is also possible to predict ROM from the OKS, but the reliability of this is improved when other independent predictors such as age, gender, body mass index (BMI) and degree of knee extension are also acknowledged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian F Maempel
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Victoria Hospital, Hayfield Road, Kirkcaldy, Fife KY2 5AH, United Kingdom.
| | - Nicholas D Clement
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Victoria Hospital, Hayfield Road, Kirkcaldy, Fife KY2 5AH, United Kingdom
| | - Ivan J Brenkel
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Victoria Hospital, Hayfield Road, Kirkcaldy, Fife KY2 5AH, United Kingdom
| | - Phil J Walmsley
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Victoria Hospital, Hayfield Road, Kirkcaldy, Fife KY2 5AH, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Does Goal Attainment Scaling improve satisfaction regarding performance of activities of younger knee arthroplasty patients? Study protocol of the randomized controlled ACTION trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2016; 17:113. [PMID: 26936270 PMCID: PMC4776377 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-0965-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2016] [Accepted: 02/24/2016] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Knee arthroplasty is being increasingly performed, and also more often in a younger patient population (<65 years of age). Up to 20 % of patients remain dissatisfied after knee arthroplasty, despite the apparent technical success of the operation. Recent studies suggest that the fulfilment of patients’ expectations plays an important role in achieving satisfaction. Thus, addressing preoperative expectations more explicitly might improve patient satisfaction. The primary aim of the present study is to investigate the effect of a multidisciplinary, goal attained and individualized rehabilitation on satisfaction of activities of younger patients (<65 years) after knee arthroplasty. Methods/design A single-centre randomized controlled trial will be conducted. In total, 120 patients (<65 years of age) with knee osteoarthritis who will undergo knee arthroplasty, will be randomly allocated to either goal attainment scaling rehabilitation or usual care rehabilitation. Goal attainment scaling rehabilitation includes drafting individually set rehabilitation goals preoperatively and measuring progress of rehabilitation on a six-point scale (-3 to +2). The primary outcome is patient satisfaction concerning activities in daily life, work and leisure time, including sports. Secondary outcome measures include KOOS, OKS, SQUASH and WORQ questionnaires and activity objectively measured with the Activ8® activity monitor. Discussion The findings of this study will help to elucidate whether goal attainment scaling is an effective rehabilitation method for achieving higher levels of patient satisfaction, with a focus on activities, in younger patients after knee arthroplasty. Trial registration This trial is since June 15th 2015 registered at the Dutch Trial Register: NTR5251.
Collapse
|
34
|
Baumann F, Ernstberger T, Loibl M, Zeman F, Nerlich M, Tibesku C. Validation of the German Forgotten Joint Score (G-FJS) according to the COSMIN checklist: does a reduction in joint awareness indicate clinical improvement after arthroplasty of the knee? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2016; 136:257-64. [PMID: 26646846 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-015-2372-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Evaluation of further improvement in treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee requires measurement tools with a high discriminatory power. In this context, joint awareness in everyday life is seen as crucial criterion. Purpose of this study was to adapt and validate a German version of the "Forgotten Joint Score" (FJS) according to the COSMIN checklist. METHODS We evaluated a German translation of the FJS for reliability, validity and responsiveness according to the COSMIN checklist. Therefore, patients with an artificial knee joint completed the G-FJS questionnaire twice at intervals of at least 2 weeks. In addition, the Knee Society Score, the Oxford Knee Score, the Tegner Activity Scale, a Visual Analogue Scale, the EuroQol-5D (EQ 5-D), and a subjective assessment of the limitations were recorded. RESULTS Between June and December 2014, one hundred and five patients (average age 65.2 years) completed both questionnaires and were available for data analysis. Test-retest reliability of the FJS was high with an ICC = 0.80 (95 % CI 0.69, 0.90) and with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.95 (95 % CI 0.92, 0.99). CONCLUSIONS The German translation of the FJS is a viable tool for the postoperative monitoring after arthroplasty of the knee. This is the first study providing data on test-retest reliability of the FJS. The FJS is a reliable and valid measurement tool for evaluation of patient rated outcome in patients with an artificial knee joint. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Validating cohort study, Level 1b.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Baumann
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany.
| | - Toni Ernstberger
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Markus Loibl
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Florian Zeman
- Center for Clinical Studies, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Michael Nerlich
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Liddle AD, Pandit H, Judge A, Murray DW. Patient-reported outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 14,076 matched patients from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B:793-801. [PMID: 26033059 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.97b6.35155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 232] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Whether to use total or unicompartmental knee replacement (TKA/UKA) for end-stage knee osteoarthritis remains controversial. Although UKA results in a faster recovery, lower rates of morbidity and mortality and fewer complications, the long-term revision rate is substantially higher than that for TKA. The effect of each intervention on patient-reported outcome remains unclear. The aim of this study was to determine whether six-month patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are better in patients after TKA or UKA, using data from a large national joint registry (NJR). We carried out a propensity score-matched cohort study which compared six-month PROMs after TKA and UKA in patients enrolled in the NJR for England and Wales, and the English national PROM collection programme. A total of 3519 UKA patients were matched to 10 557 TKAs. The mean six-month PROMs favoured UKA: the Oxford Knee Score was 37.7 (95% confidence interval (CI) 37.4 to 38.0) for UKA and 36.1 (95% CI 35.9 to 36.3) for TKA; the mean EuroQol EQ-5D index was 0.772 (95% CI 0.764 to 0.780) for UKA and 0.751 (95% CI 0.747 to 0.756) for TKA. UKA patients were more likely to achieve excellent results (odds ratio (OR) 1.59, 95% CI 1.47 to 1.72, p < 0.001) and to be highly satisfied (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.39, p < 0.001), and were less likely to report complications than those who had undergone TKA. UKA gives better early patient-reported outcomes than TKA; these differences are most marked for the very best outcomes. Complications and readmission are more likely after TKA. Although the data presented reflect the short-term outcome, they suggest that the high revision rate for UKA may not be because of poorer clinical outcomes. These factors should inform decision-making in patients eligible for either procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A D Liddle
- University of Oxford, Windmill Road, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK
| | - H Pandit
- University of Oxford, Windmill Road, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK
| | - A Judge
- University of Oxford, Windmill Road, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK
| | - D W Murray
- University of Oxford, Windmill Road, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Lim CR, Harris K, Dawson J, Beard DJ, Fitzpatrick R, Price AJ. Floor and ceiling effects in the OHS: an analysis of the NHS PROMs data set. BMJ Open 2015; 5:e007765. [PMID: 26216152 PMCID: PMC4521553 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 181] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective was to examine whether the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) demonstrated a floor or a ceiling effect when used to measure the outcome of hip replacement surgery in a large national cohort. SETTING Secondary database analysis of a national audit conducted in England and Wales on patient undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty in a secondary care setting. PARTICIPANTS 93 253 primary arthroplasty patients completed preoperative OHS questionnaires and 69 361 completed 6-month postoperative OHS questionnaires. The population had a mean age of 67.78 (range 14-100, SD 11.3) and 59% were female. PRIMARY SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome measure was the Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Secondary outcome measures were the OHS-FCS and OHS-PCS. Floor and ceiling effects were considered present if >15% of patients achieved the worst score/floor effect (0/48) or best/ceiling effect (48/48) score. RESULTS Preoperatively, 0% of patients achieved the best score (48) and 0.1% achieved the worst score (0). Postoperatively, 0.1% patients achieved the worst score, but the percentage achieving the best score increased to 11.6%. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that patients between 50 and 59 years of age had the highest postoperative best score, at 15.3%. The highest postoperative OHS worst score percentage was in a group of patients who had a preoperative OHS above 41/48 at 28%. Furthermore, 22.6% of patients achieved the best postoperative OHS-PCS and 19.9% best postoperative OHS-FCS. CONCLUSIONS Based on NHS PROMS data the overall OHS does not exhibit a ceiling or floor effect and should continue to be used as a valid measure of patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. However, subscale analysis does indicate some limitations in the OHS-PCS and OHS-FCS. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NDORMS. Introducing standardised and evidence-based thresholds for hip and knee replacement surgery. The Arthroplasty Candidacy Help Engine (ACHE tool). HTA Project 11/63/01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher R Lim
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kristina Harris
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jill Dawson
- Department of Public Health, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - David J Beard
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ray Fitzpatrick
- Health Services Research Unit, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew J Price
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Maempel JF, Clement ND, Brenkel IJ, Walmsley PJ. Validation of a prediction model that allows direct comparison of the Oxford Knee Score and American Knee Society clinical rating system. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B:503-9. [DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.97b4.34867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
This study demonstrates a significant correlation between the American Knee Society (AKS) Clinical Rating System and the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and provides a validated prediction tool to estimate score conversion. A total of 1022 patients were prospectively clinically assessed five years after TKR and completed AKS assessments and an OKS questionnaire. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated significant correlations between OKS and the AKS knee and function scores but a stronger correlation (r = 0.68, p < 0.001) when using the sum of the AKS knee and function scores. Addition of body mass index and age (other statistically significant predictors of OKS) to the algorithm did not significantly increase the predictive value. The simple regression model was used to predict the OKS in a group of 236 patients who were clinically assessed nine to ten years after TKR using the AKS system. The predicted OKS was compared with actual OKS in the second group. Intra-class correlation demonstrated excellent reliability (r = 0.81, 95% confidence intervals 0.75 to 0.85) for the combined knee and function score when used to predict OKS. Our findings will facilitate comparison of outcome data from studies and registries using either the OKS or the AKS scores and may also be of value for those undertaking meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:503–9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. F. Maempel
- Victoria Hospital, Hayfield
Road, Kirkcaldy KY2 5AH, UK
| | - N. D. Clement
- Victoria Hospital, Hayfield
Road, Kirkcaldy KY2 5AH, UK
| | - I. J. Brenkel
- Victoria Hospital, Hayfield
Road, Kirkcaldy KY2 5AH, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hossain FS, Konan S, Patel S, Rodriguez-Merchan EC, Haddad FS. The assessment of outcome after total knee arthroplasty: are we there yet? Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B:3-9. [PMID: 25568406 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.97b1.34434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
The routine use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in evaluating the outcome after arthroplasty by healthcare organisations reflects a growing recognition of the importance of patients' perspectives in improving treatment. Although widely embraced in the NHS, there are concerns that PROMs are being used beyond their means due to a poor understanding of their limitations. This paper reviews some of the current challenges in using PROMs to evaluate total knee arthroplasty. It highlights alternative methods that have been used to improve the assessment of outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F S Hossain
- Yorkshire and Humber Deanery Orthopaedic Training Rotation, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK
| | - S Konan
- NE(UCH) Orthopaedic Training Rotation, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, 350 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK
| | - S Patel
- NE(UCH) Orthopaedic Training Rotation, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, 350 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK
| | - E C Rodriguez-Merchan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, La Paz University Hospital, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046-Madrid, Spain
| | - F S Haddad
- University College London Hospitals, Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Liddle AD, Judge A, Pandit H, Murray DW. Response to Letter to the editor: 'Paper validates previous registry unicompartmental knee analyses'. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2015; 23:329-30. [PMID: 25450849 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2014] [Accepted: 11/01/2014] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- A D Liddle
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford OX37LD, United Kingdom.
| | - A Judge
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford OX37LD, United Kingdom
| | - H Pandit
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford OX37LD, United Kingdom
| | - D W Murray
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford OX37LD, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
|
41
|
Elson DW, Dawson M, Wilson C, Risebury M, Wilson A. The UK Knee Osteotomy Registry (UKKOR). Knee 2015; 22:1-3. [PMID: 25467935 DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2014] [Accepted: 10/30/2014] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- David W Elson
- Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK.
| | - Matt Dawson
- North Cumbria University Hospitals NHS Trust, Carlisle, Cumbria CA2 7HY, UK
| | - Chris Wilson
- Cardiff and Vale, University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Mike Risebury
- Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Adrian Wilson
- Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK
| |
Collapse
|