Should syndesmotic screws be removed after surgical fixation of unstable ankle fractures? a systematic review

Is There Any Purpose in Routine Syndesmotic Screw Removal? Systematic Literature Review

Introduction: The aim of this systematic review is to examine the recent evidence comparing the removal and non-removal of syndesmotic screws in tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries in terms of functional, clinical, and radiographic outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify clinical studies on syndesmotic screw removal and its outcomes, searching the Cochrane Library and PubMed Medline for publications from 1 January 2004 to 12 February 2024. Studies were included if they involved tibiofibular syndesmotic screw fixation, assessed screw removal or retention, described clinical outcomes, and were original research with at least fifteen patients per group. Results: Most reviewed articles (18 out of 27; 67%) found no significant differences between the routine removal and retention of syndesmotic screws post-fixation. Four retrospective studies (15%) suggested that retaining screws might result in worse outcomes compared to removal. Two studies (7%) indicated that removing screws could introduce additional risks. One study (4%) observed that post-removal, there is some fibula-tibia separation without affecting the medial clear space. Another study (4%) noted that intraosseous screw breakage might increase the need for implant removal due to pain. Additionally, no significant differences in ankle function were found among groups with varying intervals of screw removal. Conclusions: The current literature does not definitively support routine removal of syndesmotic screws. Given the potential complications and financial costs, routine removal should not be performed unless specifically indicated.

Syndesmotic screws, unscrew them, or leave them? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Syndesmotic injuries are frequently stabilized using syndesmotic screws. Traditionally, these screws were routinely removed during the postoperative period, however recent literature has brought into question the necessity of routine removal, citing no change in functional outcomes and the inherent risks of a second surgery. Our study aimed to compare outcomes of patients undergoing routine syndesmotic screw removal versus those undergoing an on-demand approach to removal.

Methods

A systematic search of studies comparing routine syndesmotic screw removal to on-demand screw removal following an acute ankle fracture, or an isolated syndesmotic injury was conducted across seven databases. Only Prospective randomized controlled trials were eligible for inclusion. Data reported on by at least 2 studies was pooled for analysis.

Results

Three studies were identified that met inclusion and exclusion criteria. No significant difference in Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (MD -2.36, 95% CI -6.50 to 1.78, p = 0.26), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Hindfoot Score (MD -0.45, 95% CI -1.59 to .69, p = 0.44), or dorsiflexion (MD 2.20, 95% CI -0.50 to 4.89, p = 0.11) was found between the routine removal group and on-demand removal group at 1-year postoperatively. Routine removal was associated with a significantly higher rate of complications than on-demand removal (RR 3.02, 95% CI 1.64 to 5.54, p = 0.0004). None of the included studies found significant differences in pain scores or range of motion by 1-year postoperatively.

Conclusion

Given the increased risk of complications with routine syndesmotic screw removal and the comparable outcomes when screws are retained, an as-needed approach to syndesmotic screw removal should be considered.

Risk factors associated with breakage of tibio-fibular syndesmotic screws

PURPOSE

This retrospective study aimed to investigate the factors associated with the breakage of tibio-fibular syndesmotic screws (SS).

METHODS

69 patients with unstable AO-Weber Type 44-B ankle fractures who underwent three cortex SS (3.5 mm ø) fixation were included. Patients were followed for at least one year (mean, 18.3 ± 7.6 months). At the final follow-up, patients with broken (Group I) and intact (Group II) SS were compared regarding age, gender, height, weight, body mass index, fracture type, SS length, location, and orientation. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the independent risk factors associated with SS breakage. The sensitivity, specificity, cut-off value, and area under the ROC curve were analyzed.

RESULTS

A stepwise backward logistic regression analysis revealed that age was the only independent predictor for SS breakage (OR = 0.938, 95% CI = 0.904-0.973, R2 = 0.270). ROC curve analysis demonstrated that patients younger than 36 years were associated with seven times increased risk of SS breakage [Odds ratio (95% CI), 7.042 (2.251-22.031)].

CONCLUSION

Age under 36 years was the only significant risk factor for SS breakage. The higher incidence of breakage of the syndesmotic screw can be informed to patients younger than 36.

Current concepts in ankle fractures

Ankle fractures are among the most common orthopaedic injuries. Operative management is performed in unstable ankle fracture patterns to restore the stability and native kinematics of the ankle mortise and minimize the risk of post-traumatic degenerative changes. In this study, we review current concepts in ankle fracture management, including posterior malleolus fixation, syndesmosis fixation, deltoid ligament repair, fibular nailing, and early weightbearing, from both a biomechanical and clinical perspective.

High-Ankle Sprain and Syndesmotic Instability: How Far Have We Come with Diagnosis and Treatment?

Probably one of the most controversial subjects in the orthopedic field is the distal tibiofibular articulation. Even though its most primary knowledge can be a matter of enormous debate, it is in the diagnosis and treatment most of the disagreements reign. Distinguishing between injury and instability remains challenging as well as an optimal clinical decision regarding surgical intervention. The last years presented technology and that was able to bring body to an already well-developed scientifical rationale. In this review article, we aim to demonstrate the current data behind syndesmotic instability in the ligament scenario, whereas using few fracture concepts.

Current status of the management of isolated syndesmotic injuries in Germany

INTRODUCTION

Although non-fracture-related syndesmotic injuries of the ankle are relatively rare, they may lead to poor clinical outcome if initially undiagnosed or managed improperly. Despite a variety of literature regarding possibilities for treatment of isolated syndesmotic injuries, little is known about effective applications of different therapeutic methods in day-to-day work. The aim of this study was to assess the current status of the treatment of isolated syndesmotic injuries in Germany.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An online-questionnaire, capturing the routine diagnostic workup including clinical examination, radiologic assessment and treatment strategies, was sent to all members of the German Society of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology (DGOU) and Association of Arthroscopic and Joint Surgery (AGA). Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft excel and SPSS.

RESULTS

Each question of the questionnaire was on average answered by 431 ± 113 respondents. External rotation stress test (66%), squeeze test (61%) and forced dorsiflexion test (40%) were most commonly used for the clinical examination. In the diagnostic workup, most clinicians relied on MRI (83%) and conventional X-ray analysis (anterior-posterior 58%, lateral 41%, mortise view 38%). Only 15% of the respondents stated that there is a role for arthroscopic evaluation for the assessment of isolated syndesmotic injuries. Most frequently used fixation techniques included syndesmotic screw fixation (80%, 42% one syndesmotic screw, 38% two syndesmotic screws), followed by suture-button devices in 13%. Syndesmotic screw fixation was mainly performed tricortically (78%). While 50% of the respondents stated that syndesmotic screw fixation and suture-button devices are equivalent in the treatment of isolated syndesmotic injuries with respect to clinical outcome, 36% answered that syndesmotic screw fixation is superior compared to suture-button devices.

CONCLUSIONS

While arthroscopy and suture-button devices do not appear to be widely used, syndesmotic screw fixation after diagnostic work-up by MRI seems to be the common treatment algorithm for non-fracture-related syndesmotic injuries in Germany.

Does a Reduced Secondary Operation Rate Offset Higher Implant Charges when Utilizing Suture Button Fixation for Syndesmotic Injuries?

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a reduced secondary operation rate offsets higher implant charges when using suture button fixation for syndesmotic injuries.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Single, urban, Level 1 trauma center.

PARTICIPANTS

Three-hundred twenty-seven (N = 327) skeletally mature patients with rotational ankle fractures (OTA/AO type 44) necessitating concurrent syndesmotic fixation.

INTERVENTION

Suture button or solid 3.5-mm screw syndesmotic fixation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

To compare implant charges with secondary operation charges based on differential implant removal rates between screws and suture buttons.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing screw fixation were older (48.8 vs. 39.6 years, P < 0.01), had more ground-level fall mechanisms (59.3% vs. 51.1%, P = 0.026), and sustained fewer 44C type injuries (34.7% vs. 56.8%, P = 0.01). Implant removal occurred at a higher rate in the screw fixation group (17.6% vs. 5.7%, P = 0.005). Binomial logistic regression identified nonsmoker status (B = 1.03, P = 0.04) and implant type (B = 1.41, P = 0.008) as factors associated with implant removal. Adjusting for age, the NNT with a suture button construct to prevent one implant removal operation was 9, with mean resulting additional implant charges of $9747 ($1083/case). Backward calculations using data from previous large studies estimated secondary operation charges at approximately $14220, suggesting a potential 31.5% cost savings for suture buttons when considering reduced secondary operation rates.

CONCLUSIONS

A reduced secondary operation rate may offset increased implant charges for suture button syndesmotic fixation when considering institutional implant removal rates for operations occurring in tertiary care settings. Given these offsetting charges, surgeons should use the syndesmotic fixation strategy they deem most appropriate in their practice setting.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Economic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Fibula Nail versus Locking Plate Fixation-A Biomechanical Study

In the treatment of ankle fractures, complications such as wound healing problems following open reduction and internal fixation are a major problem. An innovative alternative to this procedure offers a more minimally invasive nail stabilization. The purpose of this biomechanical study was to clarify whether this method was biomechanically comparable to the established method. First, the stability (range of motion, diastasis) and rotational stiffness of the native upper ankle were evaluated in eight pairs of native geriatric specimens. Subsequently, an unstable ankle fracture was created and fixed with a locking plate or a nail in a pairwise manner. The ankles showed significantly less stability and rotational stiffness properties after nail and plate fixations than the corresponding native ankles (p < 0.001 for all parameters). When comparing the two methods, both showed no differences in their range of motion (p = 0.694) and diastasis (p = 0.166). The nail also presented significantly greater rotational stiffness compared to the plate (p = 0.001). However, both fixations remained behind the native stability and rotational stiffness. Due to the comparable biomechanical properties of the nail and plate fixations, an early weight-bearing following nail fixation should be assessed on a case-by-case basis considering the severity of fractures.

Cost-effectiveness of on-demand removal of syndesmotic screwsx

Purpose

Syndesmotic screw removal following acute syndesmotic injury is a commonly performed procedure. However, recent studies suggest that the removal does not result in improved patient reported outcome, while the procedure has proved not to be without complications. The aim of this study was to present a health-economic evaluation of on-demand removal (ODR) compared to routine removal (RR) of the syndesmotic screw.

Methods

Data were collected from the RODEO trial, a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing functional outcome of ODR with RR. Economic evaluation resulted in total costs, costs (in Euro) per quality adjusted life year (QALY) and costs per point improvement on the Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS). This included both direct and indirect costs.

Results

Total costs for ODR were significantly lower with a mean difference of 3160 euro compared to RR (p < 0.001). The difference in QALY was not significant. The difference in OMAS at 12 months was 1.79 with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €-1763 (p = 0.512). The ICER was well below the willingness to pay. Although unit costs might vary between hospitals and countries, these results provide relevant data of cost-effectiveness.

Conclusion

The clinical effectiveness of both ODR and RR can be considered equal. The costs are lower for patients treated with ODR, which leads to the conclusion that ODR is cost-effective.

Biomechanics comparison between endobutton fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation for syndesmotic injury ankle fracture; a finite element analysis and cadaveric validation study

Introduction

Various syndesmotic fixation methods in ankle injury are recommended; however, a lack of biomechanical information persists regarding the stiffness of the fixation methods. The current study thus aimed to assess biomechanical cadaveric validation and perform a finite element analysis of syndesmotic fixation comparing endobutton vs. screw after syndesmotic injury with an ankle fracture.

Method

Five pairs of ankles of fresh cadavers were used for the validity test for Anterior Inferior Tibiofibular Ligament (AITFL), Posterior Inferior Tibiofibular Ligament (PITFL), and Interosseous ligament biomechanics properties. Four finite element models (FEM) were created: an intact model, a fracture model with/without syndesmotic injury, an endobutton fixation model, and a syndesmotic screw fixation model. Each FEM was tested vis-à-vis external rotation force, anteroposterior translation force, and compression force until model failure. The primary outcomes were stiffness and force until failure.

Result

The respective anteroposterior translation force for the stiffness of the intact model, the screw fixation model, and the endobutton fixation was 8.14, 9.15, and 8.17 N/mm. The respective external rotation force for the stiffness of intact, screw fixation, and endobutton model was 0.927,0.949, and 0.940 Nm/degree. The respective stress under compression force in the intact, screw fixation, and endobutton model was 39.94,25.59, and 37.30 MPa.

Conclusion

Both screw and endobutton fixation models provided more translation, compression, and rotation stability than normal syndesmosis, but the screw model provided greater translation and compression force stability than the endobutton model. There was no difference in rotational stability between the two models. We thus recommend the same rehabilitation protocol for both fixation methods; however, vigorous translation and compression should be avoided when using endobutton fixation.

A systematic review of ankle fracture-dislocations: Recent update and future prospects

Background

Ankle fracture-dislocations are one of the most severe types of ankle injuries. Compared to the simple ankle fractures, ankle fracture-dislocations are usually more severely traumatized and can cause worse functional outcomes. The purpose of this study was to review the previous literatures to understand the anatomy, mechanisms, treatment, and functional outcomes associated with ankle fracture-dislocations.

Methods

The available literatures from January 1985 to December 2021 in three main medical databases were searched and analyzed. The detailed information was extracted for each article, such as researchers, age, gender, groups, type of study, type of center research, level of evidence, significant findings, study aim, cause of injury, time from injury to surgery, type of fracture, direction of dislocation, follow-up, postoperative complications and functional evaluation scores.

Results

A total of 15 studies (1,089 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Only one study was a prospective randomized trial. The top-ranked cause of injury was high-energy injury (21.3%). Moreover, the most frequent type of fracture in ankle dislocations was supination-external rotation (SER) ankle fracture (43.8%), while the most common directions of dislocation were lateral (50%) and posterior (38.9%).

Conclusions

Collectively, most ankle fracture-dislocations are caused by high-energy injuries and usually have poor functional outcomes. The mechanism of injury can be dissected by the ankle anatomy and Lauge-Hansen's classification. The treatment of ankle fracture-dislocations still requires more detailed and rational solutions due to the urgency of occurrence, the severity of injury, and the postoperative complications.

Early radiographic outcomes following deltoid ligament repair in bimalleolar equivalent ankle fractures

BACKGROUND

Indications for deltoid ligament repair in bimalleolar equivalent ankle fractures are unclear. This study compared radiographic outcomes in bimalleolar equivalent ankle fractures undergoing open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) +/- deltoid ligament repair.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 1024 ankle fractures was performed. Bimalleolar equivalent injuries treated with ORIF +/- deltoid ligament repair were included. Radiographic assessment was performed preoperatively, and at three months postoperatively.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-seven ankle fractures met inclusion criteria with 46 undergoing deltoid ligament repairs. There was a significant decrease in medial clear space (1.93 ± 0.65 mm vs. 2.26 ± 0.64 mm, p = 0.01), and tibiofibular clear space (3.89 ± 1.20 mm vs. 4.87 ± 1.37 mm, p = 0.0001) at 3 months postoperative in the deltoid repair group compared to the no repair group. When syndesmotic fixation was performed, there were no differences between groups.

CONCLUSION

Deltoid ligament repair in bimalleolar equivalent ankle fractures resulted in reduced medial clear space, and tibiofibular clear space in the early postoperative period. These differences were small and remained within established normal limits.

LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Should Diastatic Syndesmosis be Stabilized in Advanced Pronation-External Rotation Ankle Injuries? A Retrospective Cohort Comparison

OBJECTIVE

With or without screw stabilization for diastatic syndesmosis in advanced pronation-external rotation (PE) ankle injuries has not yet been well-determined. Both techniques were retrospectively compared to investigate the superiority of either of the two.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was carried out. From January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2017, 81 consecutive adult patients (average, 42 years; range, 18-78 years; 44 men and 37 women) with advanced PE ankle injuries (stage 3 or 4 PE type) were treated. After malleolar fractures were internally stabilized with screws and plates, the syndesmotic stability was rechecked by external rotation and hook tests. The necessity of cortical screw insertion to stabilize diastatic syndesmosis was decided by the individual orthopaedic surgeon. Postoperatively, a short leg splint was used for 6 weeks. The syndesmotic screw was removed based on the surgeon's policy. The removal of internal fixation for malleolar fractures was required after 1 year. The outcomes of both approaches were compared clinically, and ankle function was compared using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score. For statistical comparison, the chi-square test was used for categorical data and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for numerical data.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients (average, 40 years; range, 18-78 years; 40 men and 31 women) were followed for at least 1 year (87.7%; average, 2 years; range, 1-11 years). Group 1 (with syndesmotic stabilization) had 22 patients and Group 2 (without syndesmotic stabilization), 49 patients. The union rate in Group 1 patients was 100% (22/22), and in Group 2 patients, 91.8% (45/49; p = 0.17). One deep wound infection occurred in Group 1 patients and two in Group 2 patients. Syndesmosis re-diastasis occurred in 13.6% (3/22) of Group 1 patients and 30.6% (15/49) of Group 2 patients (p = 0.13). One syndesmotic screw broke at 6 months. Satisfactory ankle function according to the AOFAS score was noted in 86.4% (19/22) of Group 1 patients and 65.3% (32/49) of Group 2 patients (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

Insertion of syndesmotic screws to promote ligament healing after internal fixation of malleolar fractures in advanced PE ankle injuries may be reasonable.

The Australian ankle syndesmosis injury survey

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE

The ankle syndesmosis is frequently disrupted in ankle injuries, with higher incidence in concomitant ankle fractures. There is debate regarding the most appropriate surgical management of these injuries, with the development of suture-button devices challenging the conventional approach of surgical stabilisation with syndesmotic screws. The primary aim of this study was to assess current practice variation at a national level, enabling a comparison with reported practice around the world. The secondary aims were to assess practice variation between operative indications and inconsistencies between surgeon device usage and personal preference should they be injured themselves.

METHODS

A 20-item survey detailing surgical experience, diagnosis, surgical management preference and a series of case studies was conducted. The survey was endorsed and promoted by the Australian Orthopaedic Association (AOA).

RESULTS

125 responses were received during the three-month study period. The most commonly used method to stabilise a syndesmotic injury by Australian orthopaedic surgeons was two 3.5 mm screws (26.4%), closely followed by one suture-button (23.2%). Overall, 44% of surgeons employ a dynamic stabilisation method and 54.4% a static stabilisation method. Half of surgeons recommend routine removal of syndesmosis screws, and surgeons tend to use two devices for high Weber C fractures. One third of surgeons who most commonly use screws in their practice would actually prefer a suture-button for management of their own syndesmosis injury.

CONCLUSION

Significant variability remains in the management of syndesmosis injuries. This survey of Australian orthopaedic surgeons reveals higher suture-button device use when compared to other countries.

In Vivo Syndesmotic Motion After Rigid and Flexible Fixation Using 4-Dimensional Computerized Tomography

INTRODUCTION

Maintaining reduction after syndesmotic injury is crucial to patient function; however, malreduction remains common. Flexible suture button fixation may allow more physiologic motion of the syndesmosis compared with rigid screw fixation. Conventional syndesmotic imaging fails to account for physiologic syndesmotic motion with ankle range of motion (ROM), providing misleading results. Four-dimensional computerized tomography (4DCT) can image joints through a dynamic ROM. Our purpose was to compare syndesmotic motion after rigid and flexible fixation using 4DCT.

METHODS

We analyzed 13 patients with syndesmotic injury who were randomized to receive rigid (n = 7) or flexible (n = 6) fixation. Patients underwent bilateral ankle 4DCT while moving between ankle dorsiflexion and plantar flexion. Measures of syndesmotic position and rotation were extracted from 4DCT to determine syndesmotic motion as a function of ankle ROM.

RESULTS

Uninjured ankles demonstrated significant decreases in syndesmotic width of 1.0 mm with ankle plantar flexion (SD = 0.6 mm, P < 0.01). Initial rigid fixation demonstrated reduced motion compared with uninjured ankles in 4 of 5 measures (P < 0.01) despite all patients in the rigid fixation group having removed, loose, or broken screws by the time of imaging. Rigid fixation led to less motion than flexible fixation in 3 measures (P = 0.02-0.04). There were no observed differences in syndesmotic position or motion between flexible fixation and uninjured ankles.

CONCLUSION

Despite the loss of fixation in all subjects in the rigid fixation group, initial rigid fixation led to significantly reduced syndesmotic motion. Flexible fixation recreated more physiologic motion compared with rigid fixation and may be used to reduce rates of syndesmotic malreduction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Maisonneuve Fractures of the Ankle: A Critical Analysis Review

»

Maisonneuve fractures (MFs), originally described as subcapital (high) fibular fractures with additional injury to the anterior and interosseous tibiofibular ligaments, display a variable injury pattern, ranging from stable to highly unstable fractures.

»

The high incidence of associated fractures of the posterior malleolus, the medial malleolus, and the anterolateral distal tibia (the "anterior malleolus") as well as the variable position of the fibula in the fibular notch (FN) warrant preoperative examination via computed tomography (CT).

»

The main goal of treatment is anatomic reduction of the distal fibula into the FN, which requires prior reduction of displaced posterior malleolar fractures, if present, to restore the integrity of the FN.

»

Open reduction of the distal fibula into the FN and fixation with 2 transsyndesmotic screws or fixation with a screw(s) and suture-button implant, under direct vision, on the lateral aspect of the ankle joint and anterior tibiofibular alignment are preferred over closed reduction to avoid sagittal or rotational malpositioning, which is associated with an inferior outcome.

»

Intra- or postoperative 3D CT visualization is essential for assessment of the accuracy of the reduction of the distal fibula into the FN.

Syndesmotic Screw Breakage May Be More Problematic Than Previously Reported: Increased Rates of Hardware Removal Secondary to Pain With Intraosseous Screw Breakage

BACKGROUND

The majority of retained syndesmotic screws will either loosen or break once the patient resumes weight-bearing. While evidence is limited, anecdotal experience suggests that intraosseous screw breakage may be problematic for some patients due to painful bony erosion. This study seeks to identify the incidence of intraosseous screw breakage, variables that may predict intraosseous screw breakage, and whether intraosseous screw breakage is associated with higher rates of implant removal secondary to pain.

METHODS

Five hundred thirty-one patients undergoing syndesmotic stabilization were screened, of which 43 patients (with 58 screws) experiencing postoperative screw breakage met inclusion criteria. Patient charts were retrospectively reviewed for demographic data, comorbidities, time to screw breakage, location of screw breakage, and implant removal. Several radiographic parameters were evaluated for their potential to influence the site of screw breakage.

RESULTS

Intraosseous screw breakage occurred in 32 patients (74.4%). Screw breakage occurred exclusively in the tibiofibular clear space in the remaining 11 instances (25.6%). Intraosseous screw breakage was significantly associated with eventual implant removal after breakage (P = .034). Screws placed further from the tibiotalar joint were at less risk for intraosseous breakage (odds ratio 0.818, P = .002). Screws placed at a threshold height of 20 mm or greater were more likely to break in the clear space (odds ratio 12.1, P = .002).

CONCLUSION

Syndesmotic screw breakage may be more problematic than previously described. Intraosseous breakage was associated with higher rates of implant removal secondary to pain in this study. Placement of screws 20 mm or higher from the tibiotalar joint may decrease risk of intraosseous breakage.Levels of Evidence: Level III: Retrospective study.

Syndesmosis screw breakage: An analysis of multiple breakage locations

INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE

Concerns have been raised about screw breakage within the tibia or fibula, referred to as intraosseous breakage. The purpose of this investigation is to analyze the technical aspects of syndesmotic screw placement in multiple anatomic breakage locations.

MATERIALS

A retrospective analysis of over 1056 patients who underwent syndesmosis fixation was completed. Demographics, screw length, width, number, height above the tibial plafond, angle, breakage location, and breakage location on the screw were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Intraosseous (IO) screw breakage (91 screws, 68 patients) was more common than clear space (CS) breakage (28 screws, 18 patients) (P = < 0.001). Within the IO group, screw breakage within the tibia (60 screws, 52 patients) was more common compared to fibula breakage (29 screws, 24 patients) (P = < 0.001).Increased BMI and the use of multiple screws were associated with IO breakage (P = .007) and CS breakage (P = .012), respectively. Increased screw angle and age were associated with fibular IO breakage (P = .021, P = .036) when compared to other IO breakage locations. Screw angle and placement showed no significant differences between compared groups (P = .629, P = .570).

CONCLUSION

Syndesmosis screw breakage, overall, occurred more commonly in an IO location. When compared to IO breakage, the use of multiple syndesmosis screws is most associated with CS breakage. Increased BMI is associated with increased IO breakage when compared to CS breakage. Patients with IO screw breakage within the fibula had increased age and placed at a higher angle when compared to other IO breakage locations. No other factors related to screw placement, including the height of placement, were found to be significantly associated with location of screw breakage.

Anatomical reconstruction of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament in elite athletes using InternalBrace suture tape

AIMS

The ideal management of acute syndesmotic injuries in elite athletes is controversial. Among several treatment methods used to stabilize the syndesmosis and facilitate healing of the ligaments, the use of suture tape (InternalBrace) has previously been described. The purpose of this study was to analyze the functional outcome, including American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, knee-to-wall measurements, and the time to return to play in days, of unstable syndesmotic injuries treated with the use of the InternalBrace in elite athletes.

METHODS

Data on a consecutive group of elite athletes who underwent isolated reconstruction of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament using the InternalBrace were collected prospectively. Our patient group consisted of 19 elite male athletes with a mean age of 24.5 years (17 to 52). Isolated injuries were seen in 12 patients while associated injuries were found in seven patients (fibular fracture, medial malleolus fracture, anterior talofibular ligament rupture, and posterior malleolus fracture). All patients had a minimum follow-up period of 17 months (mean 27 months (17 to 35)).

RESULTS

All patients returned to their pre-injury level of sports activities. One patient developed a delayed union of the medial malleolus. The mean return to play was 62 days (49 to 84) for isolated injuries, while the patients with concomitant injuries returned to play in a mean of 104 days (56 to 196). The AOFAS score returned to 100 postoperatively in all patients. Knee-to-wall measurements were the same as the contralateral side in 18 patients, while one patient lacked 2 cm compared to the contralateral side.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests the use of the InternalBrace in the management of unstable syndesmotic injuries offers an alternative method of stabilization, with good short-term results, including early return to sports in elite athletes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(1):68-75.

Ankle fractures involving the posterior malleolus: patient characteristics and 7-year results in 100 cases

INTRODUCTION

The presence of a posterior malleolar (PM) fragment has a negative prognostic impact in ankle fractures. The best treatment is still subject to debate. The aim of this study was to assess the medium-to-long-term clinical and functional outcome of ankle fractures with a PM fragment in a larger patient population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred patients (69 women, 31 men, average age 60 years) with ankle fractures including the PM were evaluated clinically and radiographically. Patients with Bartoníček-Rammelt type 3 and 4 fracture displayed a significant female preponderance. Fixation of the PM was performed in 63% and tailored to the individual fracture pattern.

RESULTS

Internal fixation of the PM fragment was negatively correlated with the need for syndesmotic screw placement at the time of surgery (p = 0.010). At an average follow-up of 7.0 years, the mean Foot Function Index (FFI) was 16.5 (SD: 21.5), the Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) averaged 80.2 (SD: 24) and the American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle/hindfoot score averaged 87.5 (SD: 19.1). The maximum score of 100 was achieved by 44% of patients. The physical (PCS) and mental health component summary (MCS) scores of the SF-36 averaged 47.7 (SD: 12.51) and 50.5 (SD: 9.36), respectively. Range of motion was within 3.4 (SD: 6.63) degrees of the uninjured side. The size of the PM fragment had no prognostic value. There was a trend to lower outcome scores with slight anterior or posterior shift of the distal fibula within the tibial incisura. Patients who underwent primary internal fixation had significantly superior SF-36 MCS than patients who underwent staged internal fixation (p = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

With an individualized treatment protocol, tailored to the CT-based assessment of PM fractures, favorable medium and long-term results can be expected.

Is routine removal of syndesmotic screw justified? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Syndesmosis injuries are common with rotational ankle injuries, and placement of a positional syndesmotic screw to maintain its reduction is used as the ligaments heal. There is no clear consensus on routine removal or retention of syndesmotic screw. This study aimed to appraise the current evidence both on removal and retention of syndesmotic screw and to conduct a meta-analysis comparing outcomes and rate of complications of syndesmotic screw removal and retention.

METHODS

Following PROSPERO registration, a systematic search using was performed using keywords ('Syndesmosis' OR 'Syndesmotic' OR 'Transsyndesmotic' OR 'distal tibiofibular') AND ('Screw') AND ('Removal' OR 'Retention') AND 'Outcome' in various databases. No language restrictions were applied and the meta-analysis incorporated the PRISMA statement. VAS (Visual analogue scale for pain), AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot And Ankle Society) scores expressed as mean ± SD, and both groups' complication rates were compared. Comparisons with a random-effects model were performed, and heterogeneity between the studies was calculated using the I2 statistic. T-test for two independent sample means was used to compare pooled mean and Z-test for two proportions to assess the difference in the proportion of complications.

RESULTS

A total of 7 studies with 522 patients were included in this review for analysis. Pooled analysis showed non-significant difference in AOFAS score (MD = -1.84; 95% CI: -4.33 to 0.66; p = 0.150) as well as for VAS score (MD = -0.48; 95% CI: -1.56 to 0.60; p = 0.390) between the two groups. The value of z and p-value for complication rates was 0.6021 and 0.5485, respectively, which was not significant.

CONCLUSION

There doesn't appear to be a difference in functional outcome, pain scores, and complication rates between patients who had their syndesmotic screws removed and those where screw was retained. The fear of inferior outcomes with retained screws is thus unfounded, and routine removal adds to morbidity and financial burden. In conclusion, present data does not support the routine removal of the intact syndesmosis screw, and a change in practice is needed to abandon routine syndesmotic screw removal.

Functional outcome of routine versus on-demand removal of the syndesmotic screw: a multicentre randomized controlled trial

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate whether on-demand removal (ODR) is noninferior to routine removal (RR) of syndesmotic screws regarding functional outcome.

Methods

Adult patients (aged above 17 years) with traumatic syndesmotic injury, surgically treated within 14 days of trauma using one or two syndesmotic screws, were eligible (n = 490) for inclusion in this randomized controlled noninferiority trial. A total of 197 patients were randomized for either ODR (retaining the syndesmotic screw unless there were complaints warranting removal) or RR (screw removed at eight to 12 weeks after syndesmotic fixation), of whom 152 completed the study. The primary outcome was functional outcome at 12 months after screw placement, measured by the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS).

Results

There were 152 patients included in final analysis (RR = 73; ODR = 79). Of these, 59.2% were male (n = 90), and the mean age was 46.9 years (SD 14.6). Median OMAS at 12 months after syndesmotic fixation was 85 (interquartile range (IQR) 60 to 95) for RR and 80 (IQR 65 to 100) for ODR. The noninferiority test indicated that the observed effect size was significantly within the equivalent bounds of -10 and 10 scale points (p < 0.001) for both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol, meaning that ODR was not inferior to RR. There were significantly more complications in the RR group (12/73) than in the ODR group (1/79) (p = 0.007).

Conclusion

ODR of the syndesmotic screw is not inferior to routine removal when it comes to functional outcome. Combined with the high complication rate of screw removal, this offers a strong argument to adopt on demand removal as standard practice of care after syndesmotic screw fixation.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(11):1709–1716.

Suture button versus syndesmosis screw fixation in pronation-external rotation ankle fractures: A minimum 6-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Randomised controlled trials (RCT) with short-term follow-ups have shown that, in treatment of syndesmosis injuries, a suture button device (SB) resulted in better radiographic and functional outcome compared to syndesmosis screw fixation (SS). However, only one RCT has reported long-term results; thus, the syndesmosis malreduction rates for both implants might increase during longer follow-up. The primary objective of this RCT was to evaluate the maintenance of syndesmosis reduction with the SS compared to the SB fixation in patients during a minimum follow-up of 6-years. The secondary objectives were to assess the post-traumatic osteoarthritis (OA) grade and the functional outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

At Oulu University Hospital, between January 2010 and December 2011, we enrolled 43 patients with Lauge-Hansen pronation-external rotation type 4/Weber C, ankle fractures with unstable syndesmosis. Patients were randomised to treatment with either a single 3.5-mm tricortical SS (22 patients) or an SB (21 patients). The mean follow-up was 7.1 years (range, 6.2-7.9). Syndesmosis reduction and OA grade was assessed with standing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) of both ankles. Malreduction was defined as >2 mm side-to-side difference in the mean width of the syndesmosis. OA was graded according to the Morrey & Wiedeman classification. The Olerud-Molander Ankle Outcome Score (OMAS) and a quality of life questionnaire (RAND 36-Item Health Survey) were used to evaluate functional outcome.

RESULTS

Two syndesmoses in the SS group and one in the SB group were malreduced (P = 0.58). Moderate OA after a mean of 7 years post-injury was common. In the SS and SB groups, 9 of 16 and 11 of 13 patients, respectively, had one or more grades serious OA in the injured ankle than in the uninjured ankle (P = 0.11). The mean OMAS was 88 in the SS group and 78 in the SB group (difference between means 7.1, 95% CI: -7.0-21.1, P = 0.32). The RAND-36 results did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSION

The SS and SB maintained syndesmosis reduction equally well during follow-up. Our study findings also suggest that both methods result in moderate OA rates and the functional outcome is comparable between these two syndesmosis fixation methods.

Comparison of Suture-Button Versus Syndesmotic Screw in the Treatment of Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Injury: A Meta-analysis

Traditionally screw fixation is an effective surgical procedure for the treatment of unstable syndesmosis injuries. However, it is still a controversy whether suture-button (SB) device can achieve better clinical outcomes and decrease the risk of complications compared with syndesmotic screw (SS). The present meta-analysis was conducted to figure out whether SB fixation was superior to traditionally screw fixation. Twelve clinical studies were identified, involving 320 patients in the SB group and 334 patients in the SS group. Among patients treated with SB, the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was significantly higher at 3-month follow-up (p = .01) and 2-year follow-up (p = .02), and the Olerud-Molander Ankle (OMA) score at 1-year follow-up (p = .002). In addition, the SB group had significantly better results in the malreduction (p = .0008), implant failure (p < .01), implant removal (p < .01), and local irritation (p = .004). No statistical differences were found in the AOFAS at 6 months follow-up (p = .33) and 1-year follow-up (p = .33), OMA at 3 months follow-up (p = .09), 6 months follow-up (p = .14) and 2 years follow-up (p = .36), the Foot and Ankle Disability Index (p = .73), Euro Qol 5-dimension questionnaire (p = .33), dorsiflexion (DF; p = .91), plantarflexion (p = .23), medial clear space (p = .42), tibiofibular clear space (p = .60), tibiofibular overlap (p = .84), and other complications (p = .95). Based on this meta-analysis, there was no significant difference in postoperative radiological measurements, and no sufficient evidence was found to support the improved clinical outcomes compared with SS fixation group. However, SB technique could improve functional outcomes, reduce the rate of implant removal, implant failure, local irritation, and malreduction without increasing risk of other complications. Therefore, the SB technique should be recommended in the treatment of syndesmosis injuries.

Elective removal of metalwork following Lisfranc injury fixation: Results of a national consensus survey of practice

No consensus exists regarding whether metalwork should be routinely removed following fixation of a Lisfranc injury. When metalwork is removed, notable variation in the timing of surgery is reported in current literature. With the support of the British Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (BOFAS) and the Orthopaedic Trauma Society (OTS) an online 10-question survey was distributed and completed by a total of 205 consultant surgeons in the UK between April-June 2020. Excluding the 20 consultant responses from a regional pilot survey, 185 responses were used to form the main analysis. Over one third (69/183, 37.7%) of surgeons reported they routinely remove metalwork following Lisfranc injury fixation at a median time of 6 months post fixation (interquartile range 4-10). The two most commonly chosen reasons for removal of metalwork were 'to optimise physiological function' and 'to reduce the risk of broken metalwork and risk of making subsequent surgery more difficult' (55/78 responses, 70.5%). Over two thirds of survey respondents (126/184, 68.5%) expressed interest to participate in a randomised controlled trial to compare outcomes of metalwork retention versus removal following Lisfranc injury fixation. Community clinical equipoise exists nationally regarding routine metalwork removal following Lisfranc injury fixation. Considering the paucity of literature, the current survey supports the development of a randomised controlled trial to establish the risks and benefits of metalwork retention versus removal, and would be of value to foot & ankle and trauma surgeons in the UK.

Surgical Site Infections After Routine Syndesmotic Screw Removal: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) after routine removal of syndesmotic screws (SSs) placed to stabilize syndesmotic injuries.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic literature search was performed in the PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases for studies published online before February 2020, using the key words and synonyms of "syndesmotic screw" ("ankle fractures" or "syndesmotic injury") and "implant removal."

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were eligible for inclusion when they described >10 adult patients undergoing elective/scheduled removal of the SS.

DATA EXTRACTION

The 15 included articles were assessed for quality and risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Baseline characteristics of the studies, the study population, the intervention, the potential confounders, and the primary outcome (% of SSIs) were extracted using a customized extraction sheet.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The primary outcome was presented as a proportion of included patients and as a weighted mean, using inverse variance, calculated in RStudio. Furthermore, potential confounders were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The percentage of SSIs ranged from 0% to 9.2%, with a weighted mean of 4%. The largest proportion of these infections were superficial (3%, 95% confidence interval: 2-5), compared with 2% deep infections (95% confidence interval: 1-4). These rates were comparable to those of other foot/ankle procedures indicating that the individual indication for SS removal (SSR) should be carefully considered. Future studies should focus on valid indications for SSR, the influence of prophylactic antibiotics on an SSI after SSR, and complications of retaining the SS to enable a fair benefits/risks comparison of routine versus on-demand removal of the SS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Untreated small posterior fragment of ankle fracture with early removal of syndesmotic screw is associated with recurrent syndesmotic instability

INTRODUCTION

This retrospective study aimed to report outcomes of fixation of bi-malleolar or tri-malleolar fractures combined with syndesmotic injury with or without posterior malleolar fracture (PMF), and to ascertain whether syndesmotic screw removal at 6 to 8 weeks or 3 months postoperatively is more beneficial.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who received open reduction and internal fixation for bi-malleolar (without PMF) or tri-malleolar ankle fracture (with PMF) with syndesmotic injury between January 2013 and December 2017 with at least 24 months of postoperative follow-up. All patients suffered syndesmotic instabilities and were treated using a syndesmotic screw without PMF fixation. Patients with bi-malleolar fracture with syndesmotic screw removal at 6 to 8 weeks postoperatively were included in Group I, tri-malleolar fracture with syndesmotic screw removal at 6 to 8 weeks in Group II, and tri-malleolar fracture with syndesmotic screw removal at 3 months in Group III. Demographic data, clinical and radiographic outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 113 patients were included (Group I, n=47; Group II, n=43; Group III, n=23). Average size of PMF was 14% in patients with tri-malleolar fractures (Groups II and III). No significant difference in ankle functional outcome among groups was observed. The recurrence rate of syndesmotic instability was 10.6% in Group I, 20.9% in Group II, and 8.7% in Group III. Although the difference in recurrence rates of syndesmotic instability among three groups was not statistically significant (P=0.264), Group II showed more interval change in tibiofibular clear space between initial postoperative radiographs and last follow-up radiographs (P=0.028) compared to the other two groups. Fracture union was achieved in all patients without screw breakage.

CONCLUSION

We suggest that the better timing for syndesmotic screw removal is 3 months, instead of 6 to 8 weeks postoperatively, to reduce the risk of recurrence of syndesmotic instability for tri-malleolar fracture without posterior fragment fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III- Case-control study.

Is there any change in surgeon's attitude to the management of ankle fractures accompanying syndesmotic injury? A nationwide survey

Objectives

This study aims to investigate the attitudes of orthopedic surgeons to the management of ankle fractures accompanied by syndesmotic injury with a nationwide survey.

Patients and methods

In the first step of this descriptive study, an electronic survey was prepared in Google drive and a survey link was sent to the Turk-Ortopedi e-mail group between 09 and 19 January 2019. The orthopedic surgeons and residents were requested to complete the questionnaire. A total of 320 orthopedic surgeons (77%) and residents (23%) participated in the survey. The responses were analyzed statistically. To evaluate the changing attitudes, our results were compared with the surgeon survey studies key worded “syndesmotic injury” in PubMed.

Results

The majority of the participants stated that they used the hook test, external rotation stress test, and fluoroscopy together (47.2%) for the diagnosis of syndesmotic injury during the operation. Of the participants, the majority (93%) reported to use metallic syndesmotic screws, and 59% reported to remove the syndesmotic screw routinely. Young surgeons with five to 10 years of experience preferred intraoperative diagnosis methods compared to surgeons with more than 20 years of experience. Foot and ankle surgeons and sports surgeons reported to allow weight bearing before removal of the screw much more than other unspecified branches.

Conclusion

The preferences of the surgeon vary in syndesmotic injuries and there is still no consensus regarding diagnosis and rehabilitation. Compared to the past decade, fewer surgeons prefer to remove the screws today.

Acute and Chronic Syndesmotic Instability: Role of Surgical Stabilization

Acute and chronic syndesmotic injuries significantly impact athletic function and activities of daily living. Patient history, examination, and judicious use of imaging modalities aid diagnosis. Surgical management should be used when frank diastasis, instability, and/or chronic pain and disability ensue. Screw and suture-button fixation remain the mainstay of treatment of acute injuries, but novel syndesmotic reconstruction techniques hold promise for treatment of acute and chronic injuries, especially for athletes. This article focuses on anatomy, mechanisms of injury, diagnosis, and surgical reduction and stabilization of acute and chronic syndesmotic instability. Fixation methods with a focus on considerations for athletes are discussed.

Reduced incidence and economic cost of hardware removal after ankle fracture surgery: a 20-year nationwide registry study

Background and purpose - Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is a treatment method for unstable ankle fractures. During recent years, scientific evidence has shed light on surgical indications as well as on hardware removal. We assessed the incidence and trends of hardware removal procedures following ORIF of ankle fractures.Patients and methods - The study covered all patients 18 years of age and older who had an ankle fracture treated with ORIF in Finland between the years 1997 and 2016. Patient data were obtained from the Finnish National Hospital Discharge Register.Results - 68,865 patients had an ankle fracture treated with ORIF in Finland during the 20-year study period between 1997 and 2016. A hardware removal procedure was performed on 27% of patients (n = 18,648). The incidence of hardware removal procedures after ankle fracture decreased from 31 (95% CI 29-32) per 100,000 person-years in the highest year 2001 (n = 1,247) to 13 (CI 12-14) per 100,000 person-years in 2016 (n = 593). Moreover, the proportion and number of removal operations performed within the first 3 months also decreased. The costs of removal procedures decreased from approximately €994,000 in 2001 to €472,600 in 2016.Interpretation - Removal of hardware after ankle surgery (ORIF) is a common operation with substantial costs. However, the incidence and cost of removals decreased during the study period, with a particular decrease in hardware removal operations within 3 months.

Functional outcome 3-6 years after operative treatment of closed Weber B ankle fractures with or without syndesmotic fixation

BACKGROUND

To compare the long-term functional outcomes of patients surgically treated for Weber B ankle fractures with or without syndesmotic fixation.

METHODS

In total, 959 adult patients with previous treatment with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for closed ankle fractures were eligible for inclusion in a cross-sectional postal survey 3-6 years after surgery; 645 had Weber B fractures. The survey assessed functional outcomes with three validated ankle questionnaires.

RESULTS

In total 365 (57%) patients responded at a median of 4.2 years after the trauma. After adjusting for age, sex, education, smoking status, body mass index, diabetes, physical status before surgery, fracture classification, and duration of surgery, patients with a syndesmotic fixation had no different OMAS score (p = 0.98), LEFS score (p = 0.61), and SEFAS score (p = 0.98) than those without a syndesmotic fixation. Trimalleolar fracture was associated with worse functional outcomes than unimalleolar on two of the scales, the OMAS (p = 0.028) and LEFS (p = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

In multivariable analysis, patients with a syndesmotic fixation had no worse long-term functional outcomes than those without syndesmotic fixation.

Syndesmotic Screw Removal in a Clinic Setting Is Safe and Cost-effective

Background. There is no consensus in the literature regarding the necessity of syndesmotic screw removal, but the majority of surgeons prefer screw removal in the operating room. Purpose. The aim of this study is to analyze the safety and cost-effectiveness of syndesmotic screw removal in the clinic. Methods. A retrospective chart review was performed on all acute, traumatic ankle fractures that required syndesmotic stabilization over 5 years at a level 1 trauma center. Radiographs were evaluated for maintenance of syndesmotic reduction. Orthopaedic clinic visits and operating room costs were calculated. Results. Of 269 patients, syndesmotic screws were successfully removed in the clinic in 170 patients and retained in 99 patients. Two superficial infections (1.2%) developed following screw removal. The superficial infection rate was 3.3% (2 of 60) in patients who did not receive antibiotics compared with 0% (0 of 110) in patients who received antibiotics (P = .12). No patient lost syndesmotic reduction after screw removal. Cost savings of $13 829 per patient were achieved by syndesmotic screw removal in the clinic. Conclusion. Our study demonstrates that syndesmotic screw removal in the clinic is safe, does not result in tibiofibular diastasis, is cost-effective, and results in substantial financial savings. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Dynamic Stabilization of Syndesmosis Injuries Reduces Complications and Reoperations as Compared With Screw Fixation: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Several devices for obtaining dynamic fixation of the syndesmosis have been introduced in recent years, but their efficacy has been tested in only a few randomized controlled trials (RCTs), without demonstrating any clear benefit over the traditional static fixation with screws.

PURPOSE

To perform a level 1 meta-analysis of RCTs to investigate the complications, subjective outcomes, and functional results after dynamic or static fixation of acute syndesmotic injuries.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis of RCTs.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed of the Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase electronic databases, as well as ClinicalTrials.gov for unpublished studies. Eligible studies were RCTs comparing dynamic fixation and static fixation of acute syndesmosis injuries. A meta-analysis was performed, while bias and quality of evidence were rated according to the Cochrane Database questionnaire and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines.

RESULTS

Dynamic fixation had a significantly reduced relative risk (RR = 0.55, P = .003) of complications-in particular, the presence of inadequate reduction at the final follow-up (RR = 0.36, P = .0008) and the clinical diagnosis of recurrent diastasis or instability (RR = 0.10, P = .03). The effect was more evident when compared with permanent screws (RR = 0.10, P = .0001). The reoperation rate was similar between the groups (RR = 0.64, P = .07); however, the overall risk was reduced after dynamic fixation as compared with static fixation with permanent screws (RR = 0.24, P = .007). The American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score was significantly higher among patients treated with dynamic fixation-6.06 points higher (P = .005) at 3 months, 5.21 points (P = .03) at 12 months, and 8.60 points (P < .00001) at 24 months-while the Olerud-Molander score was similar. The visual analog scale for pain score was reduced at 6 months (-0.73 points, P = .003) and 12 months (-0.52 points, P = .005), and ankle range of motion increased by 4.36° (P = .03) with dynamic fixation. The overall quality of evidence ranged from "moderate" to "very low," owing to a substantial risk of bias, heterogeneity, indirectness of outcome reporting, and evaluation of a limited number of patients.

CONCLUSION

The dynamic fixation of syndesmotic injuries was able to reduce the number of complications and improve clinical outcomes as compared with static screw fixation-especially malreduction and clinical instability or diastasis-at a follow-up of 2 years. A lower risk of reoperation was found with dynamic fixation as compared with static fixation with permanent screws. However, the lack of patients or personnel blinding, treatment heterogeneity, small samples, and short follow-up limit the overall quality of this evidence.

Screw fixation of the syndesmosis alters joint contact characteristics in an axially loaded cadaveric model

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to quantify the effects of rigid syndesmotic fixation on functional talar position and cartilage contact mechanics.

METHODS

Twelve below-knee cadaveric specimens with an intact distal syndesmosis were mechanically loaded in four flexion positions (20° plantar flexion, 10° plantar flexion, neutral, 10° dorsiflexion) with zero, one, or two 3.5-mm syndesmotic screws. Rigid clusters of reflective markers were used to track bony movement and ankle-specific pressure sensors were used to measure talar dome and medial/lateral gutter contact mechanics.

RESULTS

Screw fixation caused negligible anterior and inferior shifts of the talus within the mortise. Relative to no fixation, mean peak contact pressure decreased by 6%-32% on the talar dome and increased 2.4- to 6.6-fold in the medial and lateral gutters, respectively, depending on ankle position and number of screws.

CONCLUSIONS

Two-way ANOVA indicated syndesmotic screw fixation significantly increased contact pressure in the medial/lateral gutters and decreased talar dome contact pressure while minimally altering talar position.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Treatment of Ankle Fractures With Syndesmotic Rupture: Suture-Button Fixation Versus Cortical Screw Fixation

Ankle fractures accompanied by syndesmotic rupture are a complex challenge for orthopedic surgeons. Sufficient reduction and stabilization of the syndesmosis are important to prevent early degeneration of the ankle joint and to optimize clinical outcomes. The purpose of the study was to systematically review the literature comparing the suture-button fixation method with the cortical screw fixation method when treating syndesmotic rupture. For this, a systematic review of the literature was performed that included Cochrane, PubMed, and Embase. The following search terms were used: ankle fractures, syndesmosis rupture, tibiofibular syndesmosis injury, ankle joint, tightrope, and suture button. Inclusion criteria were comparison studies, acute ankle fractures with syndesmotic rupture, adult patients, and Coleman score >60. Cadaveric studies, chronic instability, open fractures, polytrauma, and arthropathies were exclusion criteria. Two investigators independently reviewed titles and relevant abstracts. Reoperation and malreduction rates were compared in a meta-analysis. Six studies with 275 patients were included: 2 randomized controlled trials and 2 prospective and 2 retrospective cohort studies. All studies used similar surgical techniques. Functional outcomes (American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society scale and the Olerud-Molander score) were not quantitatively comparable. No significantly less number of malreduction events were detected in the suture-button group (risk ratio = 0.19, 95% confidence interval 0.03 to 1.04, p = .06). Significantly lower reoperation rate was detected in the suture-button group (risk ratio = 0.21, 95% confidence interval 0.06 to 0.69, p = .01). We conclude that the suture-button technique showed a significantly lower reoperation rate and tendency toward less malreduction and better American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society scale scores. This finding is clinically relevant; however, this conclusion is primarily based on 2 studies, and therefore the interest for further research increases.

Ankle Fractures: An Expert Survey of Orthopaedic Trauma Association Members and Evidence-Based Treatment Recommendations

OBJECTIVES

To describe current practice patterns of orthopaedic trauma experts regarding the management of ankle fractures, to review the current literature, and to provide recommendations for care based on a standardized grading system.

DESIGN

Web-based survey.

PARTICIPANTS

Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) members.

METHODS

A 27-item web-based questionnaire was advertised to members of the OTA. Using a cross-sectional survey study design, we evaluated the preferences in diagnosis and treatment of ankle fractures.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-six of 1967 OTA members (8.4%) completed the survey (16% of active members). There is considerable variability in the preferred method of diagnosis and treatment of ankle fractures among the members surveyed. Most responses are in keeping with best evidence available.

CONCLUSIONS

Current controversy remains in the management of ankle fractures. This is reflected in the treatment preferences of the OTA members who responded to this survey.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level V. See Instructions for authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The burden of hardware removal in ankle fractures: How common is it, why do we do it and what is the cost? A ten-year review

BACKGROUND

Ankle fractures account for 9% of all fractures and 40% require surgical management. The ankle is the most common site of hardware removal. The purpose of our study was to investigate the incidence, indication and economic cost associated with removal of hardware from the ankle.

METHODS

We conducted a ten-year retrospective review of 1482 patients treated by open reduction internal fixation for an unstable ankle fracture. Skeletally immature patients were excluded. Data collected was cross referenced from patient medical records, the radiological and electronic patient database. The casemix and hospital inpatient enquiry system (HIPE) were used to calculate costs.

RESULTS

The mean age was 39.9 years with 53.6% male. 185 patients (12.5%) underwent hardware removal with unplanned removal performed in 6% of cases. The average cost of removal was €1113.

CONCLUSION

Removal of hardware continues to be a common operation with significant costs to all involved. More than one in 10 patients underwent future removal of hardware.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

Anatomic Ligament Repairs of Syndesmotic Injuries

Poor clinical results are seen with syndesmotic injuries in the setting of ankle sprains and ankle fractures. The goal of syndesmosis repair is to restore the normal anatomic relationship of the distal tibiofibular joint and prevent ankle arthritis. Indications for surgical intervention for isolated syndesmotic injuries include frank syndesmosis diastasis, medial clear space widening on plain radiographs, significant radiographic syndesmosis diastasis during stress examination, or subtle syndesmotic diastasis detected by arthroscopic evaluation. Complications after syndesmosis repair include symptomatic hardware, malreduction, and arthritis. Anatomic reduction of the syndesmosis leads to better outcomes following surgery.

Effect of Syndesmotic Implant Removal on Dorsiflexion

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence that syndesmotic implant removal (SIR) is beneficial. However, many surgeons advocate removal based on studies suggesting improved motion. Methodologic difficulties make the validity and applicability of previous works questionable. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of ankle dorsiflexion after SIR using radiographically measured motion before and after screw removal utilizing a standardized load.

METHODS

All patients undergoing isolated SIR were candidates for inclusion. Dorsiflexion was measured radiographically: (1) immediately before implant removal intraoperatively, (2) immediately after removal intraoperatively, and (3) 3 months after removal. A standardized torque force was applied to the ankle and a perfect lateral radiograph of the ankle was obtained. Four reviewers independently measured dorsiflexion on randomized, deidentified images. A total of 29 patients met inclusion criteria. All syndesmotic injuries were associated with rotational ankle fractures. There were 11 men (38%) and 18 women (62%). The mean, and standard deviation, age was 50.3 ± 16.9 years (range 19-80).

RESULTS

The mean ankle dorsiflexion pre-operatively, post-operatively, and at a 3-month follow-up was 13.7 ± 6.6 degrees, 13.3 ± 7.3 degrees and 11.8 ± 11.3 degrees, respectively ( P = .466). For subsequent analysis, 5 patients were excluded because of the potential confounding effect of retained suture button devices. Analysis of the remaining 24 patients (and final analysis of 21 patients who had complete 3-month follow-up) demonstrated similar results with no statistically significant difference in ankle dorsiflexion at all 3 time points.

CONCLUSION

Removal of syndesmotic screws may not improve ankle dorsiflexion motion and should not be used as the sole indication for screw removal.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective cohort study.

Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Dysfunction: A Systematic Literature Review of Dynamic Versus Static Fixation Over the Last 10 Years

The goal of the present work was to perform a systematic review of the literature of the past 10 years regarding dynamic and static fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis to determine any clinical differences between the 2 procedures. A literature search of the PubMed MEDLINE database was conducted to identify relevant studies related to distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Studies before January 1, 2007, were excluded to limit the project to the recent literature. Clinical outcomes, device removal rates, time to weightbearing after the initial procedure, and the cost effectiveness of each device were explored. In these 26 studies, 350 patients were treated using a dynamic technique and 845 were treated using a static technique. The weighted American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score was 91.70 (standard error [SE] 1.87) for dynamic fixation patients and the weighted average was 86.48 (SE 2.17) for static fixation patients (p = .068). A secondary procedure to remove the fixation device was performed in 7.7% of dynamic fixation patients and in 39.4% of static fixation patients when studies with 100% device removal were excluded (p < .0001). The mean time to weightbearing was 5.96 (SE 0.72) weeks for patients who underwent dynamic fixation and 10.45 (SE 0.99) weeks for those who had static fixation (p = .0002). The cost for dynamic fixation was found to be less than that for static fixation when secondary procedures for device removal were considered. Based on similar clinical functional scores, lower secondary procedure rates, faster time to full weightbearing, and lower costs to patients, dynamic fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis may be a superior option compared with static fixation.

To compare the efficacy between fixation with tightrope and screw in the treatment of syndesmotic injuries: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To compare the efficacy between fixation with suture-button and screw in the treatment of syndesmotic injuries: a meta-analysis.

METHODS

We comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library and performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective comparative studies (RTCs). We performed using Review Manager 5.2.

RESULTS

Three RCTs and six retrospective studies were conducted, including a total of 397 patients. The significant differences of the fixation of suture-button were reported for AOFAS scores (at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up), full-weight time, reoperation, malreduction and the rate of failure of fixation. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding complications of infection, VAS, OMAS, range of motion, TFCS, TFO and MCS.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither the functional outcome nor complications significantly differed between the fixation methods, but suture-button might lead to a quicker return to work. This analysis needs to be confirmed and updated by larger sample data and rigorously designed RCTs.

Assessing Quality of Syndesmotic Reduction in Surgically Treated Acute Syndesmotic Injuries: A Systematic Review

There is no universal method with cutoff values for the assessment of distal tibiofibular joint reduction in acute syndesmotic injuries. It is important to detect malreductions because they may lead to impaired functional outcome and may demand reoperations. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature to evaluate the appropriateness of different image techniques in determining syndesmotic malalignment. A literature search was conducted in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to search for articles assessing syndesmotic reduction. Excluded were articles where no criteria and/or measurements for syndesmotic reduction were provided, only normative values were provided and reviews. In total, 2157 articles were found, of which 1421 studies were screened for title and abstract after exclusion of duplicates. One hundred ten studies were eligible for full-text analysis. Of these, 61 were excluded. Three studies where added after screening the included references. Fifty-two studies were included, of which 32 were original publications and 20 were publications referring to the original publications. From the original publications, 14 used plains radiographs, 19 computed tomographic (CT) scans, and 5 used 3-dimensional CT scans (some authors used >1 modality in their study). For each modality, a large number of parameters and different cutoff values were reported. CT scanning is superior to plain radiography in the assessment of the quality of joint reduction. Parameters used the most were fibular position in the incisura and fibular rotation. The criteria for adequate reduction should at least include the position of the fibula in the incisura and rotation of the fibula, while ensuring adequate fibular length, all equaling or at least approaching the values of the uninjured contralateral side.

Anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament avulsion fractures in operatively treated ankle fractures: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus about the optimal treatment of anterior inferior ligament avulsion fractures of the ankle. The aim of this study is to provide insights regarding the incidence of anterior inferior ligament avulsion fractures, the association with fracture type, and correlation with treatment.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective analysis in a level-1 trauma center of adult patients with an ankle fracture operated between the dates 01-01-2009 and 01-09-2017 who had a pre- and postoperative CT-scan. Within the study population, the incidence of AITFL avulsion fracture was defined. Primary outcome was the type of avulsion fracture and related treatment. Secondary outcome was additional surgery in relation to the initial treatment.

RESULTS

In total, 65 of 252 (25.8%) patients were diagnosed with an anterior inferior ligament avulsion fracture. Zero patients had a Wagstaffe type 1 fracture, 28 (43.1%) had a type 2, 32 (49.2%) had a type 3, and 5 (7.7%) had a type 4. There was a correlation between Wagstaffe type 2 and Weber B fractures, p < 0.0001, and Wagstaffe type 3 avulsions were correlated with a Weber C fracture, p < 0.0001. Thirty-five of the avulsed fragments (53.8%) were smaller than 5 mm. In 13 (20%) of patients with anterior inferior ligament avulsion fracture, the avulsed fragments were directly fixated during initial surgery. Size and direct fixation of the fragment were significantly correlated (p < 0.0001). Within the anterior inferior ligament avulsion fracture group, only a total of four patients (6.2%) underwent a revision.

CONCLUSION

In the current study, an incidence of 25.8% of anterior inferior ligament avulsion fracture in surgically treated ankle fractures is reported. A correlation between the type of Wagstaffe injury and Weber classification was showed. Most fragments smaller than 5 mm were not fixated; however, not all injuries needed syndesmotic screws due to syndesmotic instability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Classification system of the tibiofibular syndesmosis blood supply and its clinical relevance

Due to the lack of anatomical studies concerning complexity of the tibiofibular syndesmosis blood supply, density of blood vessels with further organization of syndesmotic vascular variations is presented in clinically relevant classification system. The material for the study was obtained from cadaveric dissections. We dissected 50 human ankles observing different types of arterial blood supply. Our classification system is based on the vascular variations of the anterior aspect of tibiofibular syndesmosis and corresponds with vascular density. According to our study the mean vascular density of tibiofibular syndesmosis is relatively low (4.4%) and depends on the type of blood supply. The highest density was observed among ankles with complete vasculature and the lowest when lateral anterior malleolar artery was absent (5.8% vs. 3.5%, respectively). Awareness of various types of tibiofibular syndesmosis arterial blood supply is essential for orthopedic surgeons who operate in the ankle region and radiologists for the anatomic evaluation of this area. Knowledge about possible variations along with relatively low density of vessels may contribute to modification of treatment approach by the increase of the recommended time of syndesmotic screw stabilization in order to prevent healing complications.

In defence of the posterior malleolus

The posterior malleolus of the ankle is the object of increasing attention, with considerable enthusiasm for CT scanning and surgical fixation, as expressed in a recent annotation in The Bone & Joint Journal. Undoubtedly, fractures with a large posterior malleolar fragment that allow posterior talar subluxation from the mortise are served better by fixation. However, in all other situations, the existing literature does not support this widespread change in practice. The available biomechanical evidence shows that the posterior malleolus has little part to play in the stability or contact stresses of the ankle joint. Radiographic studies have not shown that CT scanning offers helpful information on pathoanatomical classification, case selection, or prognosis, or that scanning improves the likelihood of an adequate surgical reduction. Clinical studies have not shown any improvement in patient outcome after surgical fixation, and have confirmed that the inevitable consequence of increased intervention is an increased rate of complications. A careful and thoughtful evaluation of indications, risks, and benefits of this fashionable concept is required to ensure that we are deploying valuable resources with efficacy, and that we do no harm.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:566–9.