Addition of transversus abdominis plane block to patient controlled analgesia for laparoscopic high anterior resection improves analgesia, reduces opioid requirement and expedites recovery of bowel function

Intraoperative Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Catheters Placed for Post-operative Analgesia Following Pedicled Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Case Report

Transverse rectus abdominis (TRAM) flap reconstruction of the breast is a procedure in which a flap of skin, fat, and underlying rectus abdominis muscle is used to reconstruct the breast. This procedure is commonly performed after mastectomy and results in significant pain at the donor abdominal site. We present this case of a 50-year-old female undergoing pedicled TRAM flap surgery in which ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) catheters were placed intraoperatively, in a novel fashion: under ultrasound guidance, directly on the abdominal musculature, without overlying fat, subcutaneous tissue, or dressing. Our case-reported numeric pain scores ranged from 0-5/10 during postoperative days one to two. The patient's IV morphine requirement on postoperative days zero to two ranged between 1.34 mg to 2.6 mg per day, representing a significant decrease compared to literature-reported opioid consumption after such surgery. Her pain and opioid consumption increased significantly after catheter removal, suggesting the efficacy of our intraoperative TAP catheters.

A double-blinded, randomized trial comparing surgeon-administered transversus abdominis plane block with placebo after midline laparotomy in gynecologic oncology surgery

BACKGROUND

Surgeon-administered transversus abdominis plane block is a contemporary approach to providing postoperative analgesia, and this approach is performed by transperitoneally administering local anesthetic in the plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles to target the sensory nerves of the anterolateral abdominal wall. Although this technique is used in many centers, it has not been studied prospectively in patients undergoing a midline laparotomy.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate whether surgeon-administered transversus abdominis plane block reduces postoperative opioid requirements and improves clinical outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, patients with a suspected or proven gynecologic malignancy undergoing surgery through a midline laparotomy at 1 Canadian tertiary academic center were randomized to either the bupivacaine group (surgeon-administered transversus abdominis plane blocks with 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine) or the placebo group (surgeon-administered transversus abdominis plane blocks with 40 mL of normal saline solution) before fascial closure. The primary outcome was the total dose of opioids (in morphine milligram equivalents) received in the first 24 hours after surgery. The secondary outcomes included opioid doses between 24 and 48 hours, pain scores, postoperative nausea and vomiting, incidence of clinical ileus, time to flatus, and hospital length of stay. The exclusion criteria included contraindications to study medication, history of chronic opioid use, significant adhesions on the anterior abdominal wall preventing access to the injection site, concurrent nonabdominal surgical procedure, and the planned use of neuraxial anesthesia or analgesia. To detect a 20% decrease in opioid requirements with a 2-sided type 1 error of 5% and power of 80%, a sample size of 36 patients per group was calculated.

RESULTS

From October 2020 to November 2021, 38 patients were randomized to the bupivacaine arm, and 41 patients were randomized to the placebo arm. The mean age was 60 years, and the mean body mass index was 29.3. A supraumbilical incision was used in 30 of 79 cases (38.0%), and bowel resection was performed in 10 of 79 cases (12.7%). Patient and surgical characteristics were evenly distributed. The patients in the bupivacaine group required 98.0±59.2 morphine milligram equivalents in the first 24 hours after surgery, whereas the patients in the placebo group required 100.8±44.0 morphine milligram equivalents (P=.85). The mean pain score at 4 hours after surgery was 3.1±2.4 (0-10 scale) in the intervention group vs 3.1±2.0 in the placebo group (P=.93). Clinically significant nausea or vomiting was reported in 1 of 38 patients (2.6%) in the intervention group vs 1 of 41 patients (2.4%) in the placebo group (P=.95). Time to first flatus, rates of clinical ileus, and length of stay were similar between groups. Subgroup analysis of patients with a body mass index of <25 and patients who received an infraumbilical incision showed similarly comparable outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Surgeon-administered transversus abdominis plane block with bupivacaine was not found to be superior to the placebo intervention in reducing postoperative opioid requirements or improving other postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing a midline laparotomy. These results differed from previous reports evaluating the ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block approach. Surgeon-administered transversus abdominis plane block should not be considered standard of care in postoperative multimodal analgesia.

Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Single-Shot Epidural Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Surgery

Background Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and epidural analgesia are two frequently used regional anaesthesia techniques that attenuate postoperative pain after inguinal hernia repair.  Aim To compare the analgesic efficacy between the single-shot epidural block and TAP block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair surgery.  Methods Forty patients of either gender undergoing elective inguinal hernia surgery of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class Ⅰ and Ⅱ were randomly allocated into two groups. Group E received a single-shot epidural with 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. Group T received a TAP block with 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine under ultrasound guidance. Postoperative pain was evaluated by the visual analog scale (VAS). Rescue analgesia was given on VAS score ≥ 4 or on-demand in the postoperative period. The primary outcome included VAS score at 15 min, 1st h, 2nd h, 6th h, 12th h, and 24th h after the block. The secondary outcome was the analgesia duration, the total rescue analgesia dose required, and the patient satisfaction level. Results The VAS pain scores were significantly lower in the epidural group compared to the TAP group at the 2nd, 6th, 12th, and 24th h postoperatively (p<0.0001). The mean duration of analgesia was significantly more in Group E (576.75±96.64 min) compared to Group T (276.75±105.56 min). The total analgesic consumption was seen significantly more in 24 h in Group T than in Group E. Patient satisfaction score was significantly higher with a mean value of 5.55±0.6 in group E compared to 4.75±0.72 in group T. Conclusion A single-shot epidural provides better postoperative pain control than a TAP block. The duration of the first analgesic demand was prolonged, with less analgesic consumption in the epidural group.

Applications of the ultrasound-guided nerve block technique for nonanalgesic effects

The nerve block technique guided by ultrasound has been able to accurately block tiny nerves throughout the body in recent years. It has been increasingly used to treat multisystem diseases or analgesia in surgical patients, but the latter accounted for the vast majority of cases. The nonanalgesic effect of nerve blocks is also in wide demand. After searching ultrasound-guided nerve block works on the PubMed database, we systematically summarized the current clinical application of the nerve block technique and the unique role and related mechanism of nerve block in the prevention and treatment of multi-system diseases or symptoms, including disorders of the circulatory and respiratory systems, postoperative cognitive dysfunction, immune function, posttraumatic stress disorder, and postoperative digestive system, to put forward the potential prospective application in future and serve as a reference for future research of nerve block therapy in these diseases mentioned.

Effect of needle type on plane block spread in a cadaveric porcine model

INTRODUCTION

Plane blocks are an increasingly common type of regional anaesthesia technique in the perioperative period. Increased spread of local anaesthesia during plane blocks is thought to be related to an increased area of pain coverage. This study sought to assess differences in injectate spread comparing Tuohy needles with standard insulated stimulating block needles.

METHODS

10 Yorkshire-Cross porcine cadavers were used in this study. Immediately following euthanasia, the cadavers underwent bilateral ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block injection with radiopaque contrast dye, with one side placed with a 20 g Tuohy needle, and the other side with a 20 g insulated stimulating block needle. Injectate spread was assessed using plain film X-ray and area of spread was measured to compare differences.

RESULTS

All 10 animals underwent successful ultrasound-guided TAP block placement. In all 10 animals, the area of contrast spread was greater with the Tuohy than stimulating needle. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to analyse the difference between the groups. The average difference between the two sides was 33.02% (p=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to demonstrate differences in injectate spread with different needle types. This suggests enhanced spread with Tuohy needle compared with standard block needle, and may encourage its use during plane blocks.

Dexmedetomidine versus clonidine adjuvants to levobupivacaine for ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in paediatric laparoscopic orchiopexy: Randomized, double-blind study

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgeries are associated with less postoperative pain and adverse events compared to open procedures. But, it still reduces the quality of life in children. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is used to reduce pain. We hypothesized that dexmedetomidine or clonidine could improve the analgesic profile of levobupivacaine to the same extent during TAP block in children.

METHODS

Ninety children were randomly allocated in a randomized double-blind trial to receive bilateral TAP block with levobupivacaine plus normal saline (group B, n = 30), or dexmedetomidine (group D, n = 30) or clonidine (group C, n = 30). Primary outcome was the modified Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale score. Secondary outcomes included time to initial analgesic request, number of analgesic claims, total analgesic consumption, parents' satisfaction, sedation score and complications.

RESULTS

Children of group D showed reduced pain scores compared to other groups. They represented the longest period of analgesia (565.00 ± 71.5 min) with p < 0.001, and fewer patients required two doses of analgesia during the first postoperative day. The cumulative amount of backup analgesia was significantly different between these groups (p = 0.026). Higher parents' satisfaction scores were recorded in groups D and C compared to group B. Sedation among the study groups revealed significant differences (p = 0.035), but no severe complications were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding dexmedetomidine to levobupivacaine can extend the time of analgesia and reduce the use of postoperative backup analgesics with minimal sedation effects when used in TAP block in paediatrics undergoing laparoscopic orchiopexy. Clonidine can be used as an alternative adjuvant to local anaesthetics with good postoperative analgesic profiles.

SIGNIFICANCE

Clonidine can alternate dexmedetomidine during TAP block with local anesthetics for pediatrics laparoscopies. Both can lead to better postoperative analgesic profiles. Clonidine may be preferred, especially in our developing regions, because of its easy availability and lower cost than that of dexmedetomidine.

Quadratus Lumborum Block As A Single Anesthetic Method For Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal (Tep) Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Minimally invasive surgery for inguinal hernia repair is advantageous in terms of return to usual activities and lower rates of chronic pain; however, it requires general anesthesia. This study sought to analyze the benefits of ultrasound guided locoregional anesthesia of the quadratus lumborum muscle (QL block) as a single anesthetic technique for endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair with regard to postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, and hospital cost. A total of 46 patients, aged 18 to 80 years, with unilateral inguinal hernia, one group that received general anesthesia and one that received sedation and QL block for TEP inguinal hernia repair. In the 46 patients the median pain score 6 hours after surgery was significantly lower (2 versus 4) among the QL block group than among the group receiving general anesthesia. Consequently, the former group showed a briefer median hospital stay (6 versus 24 hours, respectively). The anesthesia and hospital costs were also lower for the QL block group, with median reductions of 64.15% and 25%, respectively. QL block is a safe and effective option for patients undergoing TEP inguinal hernia repair, given the observed reduction in early postoperative pain, briefer hospital stay, and decreased anesthesia and hospital costs.

Analgesic Efficacy of Preemptive Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery

Despite rapid advancements in laparoscopic surgical devices and techniques, pain remains a significant issue. We examined the efficacy of preemptive transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block for acute postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. We retrospectively analyzed 153 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery with or without TAP block; among them, 142 were allocated to the TAP or non-TAP group. We performed between-group comparisons of demographic, clinical, and anesthetic data and pain scores at a postoperative anesthesia care unit (PACU) and at postoperative days 1, 3, and 5. There were no significant between-group differences in demographic and clinical characteristics. The mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) were significantly lower in the TAP group at the start and end of surgery. The post-extubation bispectral index was significantly higher in the TAP group. There were no significant between-group differences in the pain scores and opioid consumption at the PACU or at postoperative days 1, 3, and 5, or in the time to pass flatus, the hospital stay length, and postoperative complications. Preemptive TAP block showed an intraoperative, but not postoperative, analgesic effect, characterized by a low mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and MAC.

Dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided tranversus abdominis plane block improves postoperative analgesia and recovery following laparoscopic colectomy

The present prospective, double blind, randomized clinical study was designed to evaluate whether dexmedetomidine (Dex) combined with ropivacaine for tranversus abdominis plane (TAP) block could improve analgesic quality and duration, and promote recovery following laparoscopic colectomy. Following induction of anesthesia, ultrasound-guided bilateral TAP block was performed in 60 patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic colectomy with either 20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine plus 2 ml normal saline 0.9% (R group), or 20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine plus 2 ml Dex (0.5 µg/kg) (RD group). Visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain, sedation level, length of hospital stay (LOS), and bowel function recovery time and associated complications were recorded. Overall patient satisfaction with postoperative pain management was also assessed. The hemodynamic variables were not significantly different between the two groups during the surgery. However, the duration of analgesia was significantly longer in the RD group compared with the R group (P<0.05). VAS scores at 1, 2, 6 and 12 h following surgery were significantly decreased in the RD group compared with those in the R group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in sedation level between the two groups. Notably, postoperative nausea and vomiting in the RD group was significantly decreased compared with those in the R group in the first 24 h (P<0.05). There were no serious adverse events in any group. Furthermore, 90.0 and 66.7% patients were satisfied with the postoperative pain management in the RD group and R group, respectively. The postoperative first bowel movement time was significantly shorter in the RD group compared with the R group (P<0.05). However, the LOS was not significantly different between the two groups. In conlusion, the addition of Dex to ropivacaine could significantly improve the analgesic quality and duration of TAP block, which in turn promotes recovery following laparoscopic colectomy.

Efficacy of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia is a key component of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for postoperative pain management. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has contributed to the implementation of this approach in different kinds of surgical procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of TAP block and its impact on recovery in colorectal surgery.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases was conducted. Studies that compared TAP block to a control group (no TAP block or placebo) after colorectal resections were included. The effects of TAP block in patients undergoing colorectal surgery were assessed, including the technical aspects of the procedure. Two measures were used to evaluate the effectiveness of postoperative pain control: a numeric pain rating score at rest and on coughing or movement at 24 h following surgery and the opioid requirement at 24 h. Clinical aspects of recovery were postoperative ileus, surgical site infection, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were included in the analysis. Data showed that TAP block is a safe procedure associated with a significant reduction in the pain score at rest [WMD - 0.91 (95% CI - 1.56; - 0.27); p < 0.05] and on coughing or movement [WMD - 0.36 (95% CI - 0.72; - 0.01); p < 0.05] at 24 h after surgery and a significant decrease in morphine consumption in the TAP block group the day after surgery [WMD - 2.07 (95% CI - 2.63; - 1.51); p < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

TAP block appears to provide both an effective analgesia and a significant reduction in opioid use on the first postoperative day after colorectal surgery. Its use does not seem to lead to increased postoperative complications.

Effectiveness and Safety of Continuous Transverse Abdominal Plane Blocks vs Epidural Analgesia in Donor Nephroureterectomy

BACKGROUND

The transverse abdominal plane (TAP) block is sensitive and encompasses peripheral nerves of the anterior abdominal wall. It decreases 27% of the forced vital capacity, 58% of maximum inspiratory, and 51% of the maximum expiratory pressure on the first postoperative day. It is a postoperative analgesic alternative.

OBJECTIVE

The researchers sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the TAP block compared with continuous epidural analgesia in donor nephroureterectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A controlled clinical trial of 30 randomized patients in 2 groups-TAP and continuous epidural analgesia-was used. In the TAP group, a catheter was installed in the transverse abdominal plane and ropivacaine, 0.375% 20 mL, and ropivacaine, 0.2%, were deposited in an elastomeric infuser. The other group was installed with an epidural catheter; at the end of the surgery, 10mL of ropivacaine 0.2% was administered and connected to an elastomeric infuser. Adverse effects and pain intensity were evaluated in the first 36 hours; Student t test and the χ² test were applied.

RESULTS

The study showed similar analgesia in both groups at 6 hours after the procedure (P = .256); better analgesia was seen in the TAP group in the next 30 hours (P = .000). Researchers also found time for bladder catheter removal, ambulation, and minor hospital discharge in the TAP vs the epidural group as follows: 18.2 ± 3.6 vs 21.7 ± 4.4 hours (P = .028), 20 ± 3.5 vs 23.5 ± 4.2 hours (P = .019), and 51.2 ± 8.4 vs 62.4 ± 17.6 hours (P = .035), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous TAP blockade is an effective and safe technique. It favors early recovery, early removal of the bladder catheter, ambulation, and discharge.

Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Multimodal analgesia is important for postoperative recovery in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Multiple randomized controlled trials have investigated the use of transversus abdominis plane local anesthetic infiltration as a method of decreasing postoperative pain and opioid consumption, with variable results.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the overall effect of transversus abdominis plane block in postoperative pain, opioid use, and speed of recovery in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was done with PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Knowledge, and Cochrane Library. Only randomized controlled trials were selected for review.

INTERVENTIONS

Transversus abdominis plane local anesthetic infiltration versus no intervention, saline, or other techniques in laparoscopic colorectal surgeries was investigated.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measured was postoperative pain on day 1, at rest or with activity. The secondary outcomes measured were postoperative pain beyond day 1, consumptions of opioid, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Eight clinical trials including 649 patients between 2013 and 2018 were included. Resting pain scores within 2 hours (standardized mean difference, -0.53; p = 0.01), 4 hours (standardized mean difference, -0.42; p = 0.004), and 6 hours (standardized mean difference, -0.47; p = 0.03) showed statistically significant reduction. Six studies including 413 patients demonstrated lower cumulative opioid consumption within 24 hours after surgery (standardized mean difference, -0.82; p = 0.01). Five studies including 357 patients did not show a significant difference in length of stay (standardized mean difference, -0.04; p = 0.82).

LIMITATIONS

Local anesthetic used in block varied in type and quantity across different studies. There were heterogeneities in pain score measurements and opioid consumption. Patient populations may be different among studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Transversus abdominis block can lead to a lower pain score at rest within the first 6 hours and reduce opioid consumption within the first 24 hours. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A997.

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Versus Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery

BACKGROUND

Transversus abdominis plane block may improve analgesia after colorectal surgery; however, techniques remain unstandardized and results are conflicting.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare laparoscopic and ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block with no block in minimally invasive colorectal surgery.

DESIGN

This was a randomized controlled trial.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at an urban teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery were included.

INTERVENTIONS

The intervention included 2:2:1 randomization to laparoscopic, ultrasound-guided, or no transversus abdominis plane block.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Morphine use in the first 24 hours after surgery was measured.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 107 patients randomly assigned to laparoscopic (n = 41), ultrasound-guided (n = 45), or no transversus abdominis plane block (n = 21). Mean age was 50.4 years (SD ± 18 y), and 50 patients (47%) were men. Laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block was superior to ultrasound-guided (p = 0.007) and no transversus abdominis plane block (p = 0.007), with median (interquartile range) total morphine used in the first 24 hours postoperatively of 17.6 mg (6.6-33.9 mg), 34.0 mg (16.4-44.4 mg), and 31.6 mg (18.4-44.4 mg). At 48 hours, laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block remained superior to ultrasound-guided (p = 0.03) and no transversus abdominis plane block (p = 0.007) with median (interquartile range) total morphine used at 48 hours postoperatively of 26.8 mg (15.5-45.8 mg), 44.0 mg (27.6-70.0 mg), and 60.8 mg (34.8-78.8 mg). Mean hospital stay was 5.1 ± 3.1 days without any intergroup differences. Overall complications were similar between groups.

LIMITATIONS

Treatment teams were not blinded and there was operator dependence of techniques and variable timing of the blocks.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block is superior to ultrasound-guided and no transversus abdominis plane block in achieving pain control and minimizing opioid use in the first 24 hours after colorectal surgery. A large, multicenter, randomized trial is needed to confirm our findings. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A822.

Ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block utilization in multimodal pain management after open gynecologic surgery

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a peripheral nerve block directed at the nerves in the anterior abdominal wall. We sought to determine whether TAP block reduces post-operative narcotic use or length of stay after open gynecologic surgery. Among 98 women who underwent an open hysterectomy between July 2016 - July 2017 by a gynecologic oncologist, 73 (74.5%) received a TAP block. The majority of patients who received a TAP block had a vertical incision (86.3%) while the majority of patients who did not receive TAP block had a transverse incision (64%). More patients in the TAP block group underwent cancer debulking compared to the no TAP block group (65.7% versus 8%). The two groups did not differ in post-operative pain scores on day 1, 2, or 3, cumulative narcotic use by post-operative day 3, length of stay, or ileus. We found TAP block after vertical skin incision results in comparable pain scores, narcotic use, and length of stay compared to patients undergoing transverse incisions without TAP block.

Pain management in abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND

Abdominal surgery has undergone major changes during the last two decades with a general shift from open, invasive surgery to closed minimally invasive surgery. Accordingly, pain management strategies have also changed, especially with the introduction of ultrasound-guided abdominal wall blocks. Despite laparoscopic abdominal surgery classified as minimal, pain can be quite significant and needs to be addressed appropriately.

PURPOSE

This narrative review focuses on adequate pain strategies for various types of surgery. The respective techniques are described and examples of specific pain management strategies given. Advantages and disadvantages of techniques are discussed. This review can serve as a sort of empirical guideline and orientation for the reader to develop their own strategy as well as bringing surgeons up-to-date with the latest anesthetic techniques.

CONCLUSION

Pain is not less or less relevant in minimally invasive surgery. New hallmarks of a multimodal pain strategy are abdominal wall blocks, either as single shot or continuously. Minor open surgery is best performed under a combination of loco-regional blocks and continuous sedation. Abdominal wall blocks, NSAIDs, and short-acting opioids given by nurses or as PCA present the best multimodal pain strategy in abdominal surgery. Epidural analgesia and spinal anesthesia have become second-line options or are reserved for specific patient morbidities or surgical requirements.

Effect of the transversus abdominis plane block on postoperative pain and recovery in patients with hepatic echinococcosis

Objectives

Hepatic echinococcosis (HE) is a severe parasitic disease that occurs worldwide, and radical surgery is the recommended therapy. This study was performed to investigate the efficacy of using a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block during surgery on postoperative pain and recovery of patients with HE under the guidelines of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol.

Methods

Fifty-eight patients from the Tibetan plateau who underwent surgery for treatment of HE by the same surgeons under the guidance of ERAS were included in the present study. A TAP block was conducted before closing the abdominal cavity.

Results

The consumption of sufentanil was significantly lower in patients of the TAP than control group. Patients had a significantly shorter time to first flatus in the TAP than control group. Other parameters showed no significant differences between the two groups.

Conclusions

Use of the TAP block could reduce the consumption of analgesic medication and promote recovery of patients from the Tibetan plateau under the guidance of an ERAS protocol.

Effects of dexmedetomidine as an adjunct in transversus abdominis plane block during gynecological laparoscopy

Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block for abdominal surgery has been widely studied in clinical settings. However, dexmedetomidine as an adjunctive analgesic combined with TAP block has been rarely reported. The present study evaluated the efficacy of TAP block combined with dexmedetomidine adjunct for gynecological laparoscopy. In brief, 90 patients were randomly divided into three groups: Group I, which received post-operative intravenous analgesia only after general anesthesia; Group II, which received a TAP block with 20 ml 0.375% ropivacaine; and Group III, which received a TAP block with 20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine and 1 µg/kg dexmedetomidine after induction. In all groups, propofol was used for general anesthesia. The dosage of propofol, duration of the operation, and the time of awakening, spontaneous breathing and extubation were recorded. In addition, the Steward and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were determined at 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 h post-surgery. The occurrence of nausea and vomiting and/or respiratory depression was also recorded. Compared with those in Group I, the dosage of propofol, as well as the time of awakening, spontaneous breathing and extubation were significantly decreased in Group III (P<0.01 and P<0.05, respectively). In addition, the VAS score at 2 and 4 h in Group II (both P<0.05) and 2, 4 (both P<0.01) and 8 h (P<0.05) in Group III after the surgery were significantly lower compared with those in Group I. Furthermore, in Groups II and III, a lower number of cases experienced nausea and vomiting (P<0.05). In conclusion, the ultrasound-guided TAP block combined with dexmedetomidine adjunct may improve recovery from anesthesia and reduce post-operative pain (trial registration no. ChiCTR-IPR-15007398).

Endogenous Opiates and Behavior: 2015

This paper is the thirty-eighth consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system. It summarizes papers published during 2015 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior, and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia, stress and social status, tolerance and dependence, learning and memory, eating and drinking, drug abuse and alcohol, sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology, mental illness and mood, seizures and neurologic disorders, electrical-related activity and neurophysiology, general activity and locomotion, gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions, cardiovascular responses, respiration and thermoregulation, and immunological responses.

Liposomal Bupivacaine Use in Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks Reduces Pain and Postoperative Intravenous Opioid Requirement After Colorectal Surgery

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery protocols frequently use multimodal postoperative analgesia to improve postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate liposomal bupivacaine use in transversus abdominis plane blocks on postoperative pain scores and opioid use after colorectal surgery.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study comparing outcomes between patients receiving nonliposomal anesthetic (n = 104) and liposomal bupivacaine (n = 303) blocks.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at a single tertiary care center.

PATIENTS

Patients included those identified within an institutional database as inpatients undergoing colorectal procedures between 2013 and 2015 who underwent transversus abdominis plane block for perioperative analgesia.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The study measured postoperative pain scores and opioid requirements.

RESULTS

Patients receiving liposomal bupivacaine had significantly lower pain scores for the first 24 to 36 postoperative hours. Pain scores were similar after 36 hours. The use of intravenous opioids among the liposomal bupivacaine group decreased by more than one third during the hospitalization (99.1 vs 64.5 mg; p = 0.040). The use of ketorolac was also decreased (49.0 vs 18.3 mg; p < 0.001). In subgroup analysis, the decrease in opioid use was observed between laparoscopic and robotic procedures but not with laparotomies. No significant differences were noted in the use of oral opioids, acetaminophen, or ibuprofen. Postoperative length of stay and total cost were decreased in the liposomal bupivacaine group but did not achieve statistical significance.

LIMITATIONS

The study was limited by its retrospective, single-center design and heterogeneity of block administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Attenuated pain scores observed with liposomal bupivacaine use were associated with significantly lower intravenous opioid and ketorolac use, suggesting that liposomal bupivacaine-containing transversus abdominis plane blocks are well aligned with the opioid-reducing goals of many enhanced recovery protocols.

Pilot study of a novel pain management strategy: evaluating the impact on patient outcomes

BACKGROUND

Our objective was to evaluate the impact of a novel multimodal pain management strategy on intraoperative opioid requirements, postoperative pain, narcotic use, and length of stay.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection were managed with an experimental protocol. The protocol uses a post-induction, pre-incision bilateral TAP block and local peritoneal infiltration at port sites with long-acting liposomal bupivacaine (20 mL long-acting liposomal bupivacaine, 30 mL 0.25 % bupivacaine, 30 mL saline). Experimental patients were matched on age, body mass index, gender, comorbidity, diagnosis, and procedure to a control group that received no block or local wound infiltration. Both groups followed a standardized enhanced recovery pathway. Demographics, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. The main outcome measures were intraoperative opioids, postoperative pain, opioid use, and length of stay.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were analyzed-25 experimental and 25 controls. Patients were well matched on all demographics. In both cohorts, the main diagnosis was colorectal cancer and primary procedure performed a segmental resection. Operative times were similar (p = 0.41). Experimental patients received significantly less intraoperative fentanyl (mean 158 mcg experimental vs. 299 mcg control; p < 0.01). The experimental group had significantly lower initial (p < 0.01) and final PACU pain scores (p = 0.04) and shorter LOS (3.0 vs. 4.1 days, p = 0.04) compared to controls. Experimental patients trended toward shorter PACU times and lower opioid use and daily pain scores throughout the hospital stay. Postoperative complication and readmission rates were similar across groups. There were no reoperations or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Our multimodal pain management strategy reduced intraoperative opioid administration. Postoperatively, improvements in PACU time, postoperative pain and narcotic use, and lengths of stay were seen in the experimental cohort. With the favorable finding from the pilot study, further investigation is warranted to fully evaluate the impact of this pain management protocol on patient satisfaction, clinical and financial outcomes.

Clinical curative effect of Mesalt combined with Mepilex dressing in postoperative infection of inguinal hernia

Background

Inguinal hernia is a common surgical disease. Tension-free hernioplasty is currently commonly used for its treatment, with multiple advantages such as simple surgical method, low recurrence rate, and ability to be performed in primary care hospitals, but the risk of incision infection still exists. Mild infection can be cured by local washing, dressing, and systemic antibiotics. If the infection is severe, the wound may not heal after removing the patch, and secondary suturing is needed.

Material/Methods

A total of 60 patients with postoperative infection after tension-free repair of inguinal hernia were randomly divided into control (n=30) and treatment (n=30) groups. Patients in the treatment group received Mesalt combined with Mepilex for dressing while the patients in the control group received conventional gauze for dressing. Pain degree, wound healing time, and dressing times were observed.

Results

The clinical therapeutic effect in the treatment group was significantly better than in the control group. The treatment group exhibited significantly less pain when patients receive dressing, shorter wounds healing time (15±3.5 vs. 30±5.0), and less dressing frequency (10±2.1 vs. 20±2.4).

Conclusions

Mesalt combined with Mepilex can effectively improve postoperative infection after inguinal hernia treatment, obviously reducing pain, shorting wound healing time, and decreasing dressing frequency. It can be widely used in clinical practice.