HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer: a rogues' gallery of challenging diagnostic cases: UKNEQAS interpretation guidelines and research recommendations

Atypical Co-amplification with Co-localization of HER2 Gene in Breast Cancer: Combined IHC/FISH Approach as per ASCO/CAP 2018 Guidelines for Targeted Therapy Eligibility

Breast cancer patients with HER2 gene amplification as assessed by FISH are eligible for HER2-targeted therapy. However, in a small subset of patients, unusual FISH pattern of co-localization and co-amplification can pose challenges in interpretation of the HER2 status and hence to assess the HER2 status accurately; our aim was to report their incidence and analyze them based on latest ASCO/CAP 2018 guidelines. We present seven cases with HER2/CEP17 co-amplification and co-localization from a total 4040 cases referred during the year 2017 to 2021 at Mumbai Reference Laboratory, SRL Diagnostics. Core needle biopsy/excision invasive breast carcinoma specimens from metastatic sites were tested for IHC for expressions of ER, PR, and HER2. The ones which came equivocal on HER2 IHC were then evaluated for HER2 amplification by FISH. Co-amplification and co-localization of HER2 and centromeric 17 was observed with a frequency of 0.1% that falls in the range of 0.5-0.1% as reported from other large-scale studies. Our study showed that implementation of a binary inhouse concurrent assessment with IHC as per the ASCO/CAP 2018 helps to reach the most definitive and accurate HER2 status. Our study is an attempt to report such challenging FISH patterns and their work-up for a better understanding on the interpretation. Cumulative data along with follow-up in these cases would bring an insight into exact therapeutic outcome.

FISH Diagnostic Assessment of MDM2 Amplification in Liposarcoma: Potential Pitfalls and Troubleshooting Recommendations

MDM2 amplification represents the leading oncogenic pathway and diagnostic hallmark of liposarcoma, whose assessment is based on Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) analysis. Despite its diagnostic relevance, no univocal interpretation criteria regarding FISH assessments of MDM2 amplification have been established so far, leading to several different approaches and potential diagnostic misinterpretations. This study aims to address the most common issues and proposes troubleshooting guidelines for MDM2 amplification assessments by FISH. We retrospectively retrieved 51 liposarcomas, 25 Lipomas, 5 Spindle Cell Lipoma/Pleomorphic Lipomas, and 2 Atypical Spindle Cell Lipomatous Tumors and the corresponding MDM2 FISH analysis. We observed MDM2 amplification in liposarcomas cases only (43 out of 51 cases) and identified three MDM2-amplified patterns (scattered (50% of cases), clustered (14% of cases), and mixed (36% of cases)) and two nonamplified patterns (low number of signals (82% of cases) and polysomic (18% of cases)). Based on these data and published evidence in the literature, we propose a set of criteria to guide MDM2 amplification analysis in liposarcoma. Kindled by the compelling importance of MDM2 assessments to improve diagnostic and therapeutic liposarcoma management, these suggestions could represent the first step to develop a univocal interpretation model and consensus guidelines.

Clinical-radiomics nomogram for identifying HER2 status in patients with breast cancer: A multicenter study

Purpose

To develop and validate a clinical-radiomics nomogram based on radiomics features and clinical risk factors for identification of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in patients with breast cancer (BC).

Methods

Two hundred and thirty-five female patients with BC were enrolled from July 2018 to February 2022 and divided into a training group (from center I, 115 patients), internal validation group (from center I, 49 patients), and external validation group (from centers II and III, 71 patients). The preoperative MRI of all patients was obtained, and radiomics features were extracted by a free open-source software called 3D Slicer. The Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression model was used to identify the most useful features. The radiomics score (Rad-score) was calculated by using the radiomics signature-based formula. A clinical-radiomics nomogram combining clinical factors and Rad-score was developed through multivariate logistic regression analysis. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

A total of 2,553 radiomics features were extracted, and 21 radiomics features were selected as the most useful radiomics features. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that Rad-score, progesterone receptor (PR), and Ki-67 were independent parameters to distinguish HER2 status. The clinical-radiomics nomogram, which comprised Rad-score, PR, and Ki-67, showed a favorable classification capability, with AUC of 0.87 [95% confidence internal (CI), 0.80 to 0.93] in the training group, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.94) in the internal validation group, and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.93) in the external validation group. DCA illustrated that the nomogram was useful in clinical practice.

Conclusions

The nomogram combined with Rad-score, PR, and Ki-67 can identify the HER2 status of BC.

Detailed Reanalysis of 500 Breast Cancers With Equivocal HER2 Immunohistochemistry and Borderline ERBB2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Results

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the impact of our laboratory's reflex testing process for resolving ERBB2 (HER2) status on breast cancer samples that require additional workup after fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), per guideline recommendations published in 2018 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP).

METHODS

In total, 500 breast cancer specimens with ERBB2 FISH results in groups 2 through 4 (all reported as immunohistochemistry [IHC] equivocal [2+] at external laboratories) were resubmitted for IHC testing in our laboratory. Per the ASCO/CAP guideline, FISH was rescored when internal IHC was also equivocal (2+), targeted to tumor areas demonstrating more intense IHC staining, if observed.

RESULTS

Reflex IHC/FISH testing changed the final reported ERBB2 status in 185 of 500 (37.0%) samples. Result changes included discordant IHC (n = 4 score 0, n = 132 score 1+, and n = 16 score 3+) and discordant FISH (n = 33). Numerical differences in FISH scores were comparable for targeted vs nontargeted FISH rescoring (P = .086 for ERBB2 copy number; P = .49 for ERBB2 ratio). Two cases showed larger differences in FISH scores, suggesting heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

Retesting of breast cancer samples with equivocal IHC frequently changes IHC results, but targeted reanalysis of borderline FISH results rarely identifies significant differences in ERBB2 copy number or ratio.

HER2 Testing: Insights From Pathologists' Perspective on Technically Challenging HER2 FISH Cases

OBJECTIVE

College of American Pathologists and the American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines provide straightforward criteria for HER2 interpretation in breast carcinomas; however, a subset of cases present unusual diagnostic dilemmas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten challenging HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) cases were selected for analysis. The study included a variety of problematic cases such as those with discordant immunohistochemistry (IHC) and FISH results, cases with high intratumoral variability in HER2 copy number, a case with a highly amplified clone in 5% to 10% of the tumor sample, and a case with tumor cells containing tightly clumped HER2 signals. Six high volume HER2 FISH laboratories performed and interpreted HER2 FISH (adding HER2 IHC if necessary). Interpretation strategies were discussed.

RESULTS

There was 100% concordance between laboratories in 4/10 cases. Tumors with increased intratumoral variability (tumors with high variability in HER2 copy number per cell but which otherwise do not fulfill College of American Pathologists and the American Society of Clinical Oncology criteria for heterogeneity) exhibited 100% concordance in 3/4 cases, but 1 case had only 50% agreement. Low positive HER2 cases (group 1 cases with <6 average HER2 copies/cell) had 1 laboratory disagreeing with the majority in 4/4 cases, and this was the only category with discordance between IHC and FISH methodologies. All laboratories identified the case with heterogeneity and interpreted it as positive. Five of the 6 laboratories interpreted the case with tightly clustered HER2 signals as positive.

CONCLUSIONS

This study offers specific observations and interpretation strategies that laboratories can use when confronted with difficult HER 2 cases. It then highlights communication strategies a laboratory may use to discuss these unusual HER2 results with the clinical team.

International Harmonization of Provisional Diagnostic Criteria for ERBB2-Amplified Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Allowing for Screening by Next-Generation Sequencing Panel

PURPOSE

ERBB2 amplification (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positivity [HER2+]) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has important therapeutic implications that necessitate the need for accurate diagnostics. The study purpose was to establish and validate harmonized diagnostic criteria for HER2+ mCRC among 3 groups (GI-SCREEN-Japan, NCTN-SWOG-USA, and Korea).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We assessed HER2 status by immunohistochemistry (IHC), ERBB2/CEP17 ratio, gene copy number (GCN) by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and copy number variation (CNV) using two targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels. Tumor samples from 475 and 16 patients with mCRC in exploratory and validation cohorts, respectively, were used for cross-validation of the NGS panels.

RESULTS

Consensus diagnostic criteria among the 3 groups for HER2+ mCRC were established as follows: IHC 3+ or IHC 2+ and ERBB2/CEP17 ratio by FISH ≥ 2.0, tumor content > 10% for surgically resected specimens, and necessary tumor content not defined for biopsy specimens. The median GCN and CNV for HER2+ patients were 10.9 and 27.7 compared with 2.5 ( P < .0001) and 3.5 ( P < .0001), respectively, in HER2-negative patients. These findings were validated in a validation cohort (GCN, 16.2 v 2.4 [ P = .0002]; CNV, 42.5 v 2.0 [ P = .0003]). GCN correlated with CNV in both cohorts (exploratory, r = 0.90; validation, r = 0.97; P < .0001). CNV in cross-validation of the 2 NGS panels also showed a strong correlation ( r = 0.98; P < .0001). CNV in patients who fulfilled the consensus criteria was > 4.0 in all, which demonstrates the accuracy of the IHC/FISH criteria and cross-validation of NGS panels.

CONCLUSION

We have established and verified harmonized diagnostic criteria for HER2+ and demonstrated consistency between IHC/FISH and CNV determined by NGS in mCRC.

Loss of STAT6 leads to anchorage-independent growth and trastuzumab resistance in HER2+ breast cancer cells

Approximately 20% of breast cancers are HER2-positive. Trastuzumab has improved patient outcomes significantly for these cancers. However, acquired resistance remains a major hurdle in the clinical management of these patients. Therefore, identifying molecular changes that cause trastuzumab resistance is worthwhile. STAT6 is a transcription factor that regulates a variety of genes involved in cell cycle regulation, growth inhibition, and apoptosis. STAT6 expression is lost in approximately 3% of breast cancers, but little work has been done in the context of trastuzumab resistance in breast cancer. In isogenic cell line pairs, we observed that trastuzumab-resistant cells expressed significantly lower levels of STAT6 compared to trastuzumab-sensitive cells. Therefore, in order to study the consequences of STAT6 loss in HER2+ breast cancer, we knocked out both alleles of the STAT6 gene using somatic cell gene targeting. Interestingly, loss of STAT6 resulted in anchorage-independent growth and changes in several genes involved in epithelial to mesenchymal transition. This study suggests that STAT6 may play a role in the pathophysiology of HER2+ human breast cancer.

Complete pathologic response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy increases with increasing HER2/CEP17 ratio in HER2 overexpressing breast cancer: analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB)

BACKGROUND

HER2-positive breast cancer is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer that overexpresses human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 promoting cancer cell growth. Monoclonal antibodies targeting the HER2 receptor have improved survival for this patient population. Achieving pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has correlated with disease-free survival in multiple trials, but we do not know why some HER2-positive tumors respond better to these therapies. We evaluated the correlation between HER2/CEP17 ratio and partial versus complete response following NAC. We evaluated whether patients with higher HER2/CEP17 ratios would have higher rates of pCR after NAC.

METHODS

Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we performed a retrospective review comparing pCR rates after NAC based on HER2 ratio between 2005 and 2014. Patients were excluded if they were HER2 negative, did not undergo NAC, or if the HER2 ratio was not recorded. Trends in percentage of pCR versus partial response were analyzed using SPSS.

RESULTS

The NCDB included 237,118 patients with HER2 equivocal or HER2-positive breast tumors. 29,291 of these patients underwent NAC, and HER2/CEP17 ratios were recorded in 14,597 of the NAC cases. A pCR was noted in 9752 patients and 11,402 patients had a partial response. The ratios were significantly different between complete vs. partial response groups (include ratios), P < 0.001. Using linear regression analysis, we identified a direct relationship between increasing the ratio and response to NAC.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates a linear relationship between HER2/CEP17 ratio and pCR to NAC in patients included in the NCDB. The NCDB reflects current clinical practices across the country, and in this patient population, higher HER2 ratio is predictive of pCR to NAC and thus may be used in guiding decisions regarding the therapies that a patient receives in order to enhance pCR.

HER2 status in breast cancer: changes in guidelines and complicating factors for interpretation

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein overexpression and/or HER2 gene amplification is found in about 20% of invasive breast cancers. It is a sole predictive marker for treatment benefits from HER2 targeted therapy and thus, HER2 testing is a routine practice for newly diagnosed breast cancer in pathology. Currently, HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) is used for a screening test, and in situ hybridization is used as a confirmation test for HER2 IHC equivocal cases. Since the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines on HER2 testing was first released in 2007, it has been updated to provide clear instructions for HER2 testing and accurate determination of HER2 status in breast cancer. During HER2 interpretation, some pitfalls such as intratumoral HER2 heterogeneity and increase in chromosome enumeration probe 17 signals may lead to inaccurate assessment of HER2 status. Moreover, HER2 status can be altered after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or during metastatic progression, due to biologic or methodologic issues. This review addresses recent updates of ASCO/CAP guidelines and factors complicating in the interpretation of HER2 status in breast cancers.

Fast fluorescence in situ hybridisation for the enhanced detection of MET in non-small cell lung cancer

The c-Met/hepatocyte growth factor receptor pathway is frequently dysregulated in multiple cancer types, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MET amplification has been shown to develop as a resistance mechanism to treatment in NSCLC. The identification of increased MET copy number within tumour cells is increasingly important to stratify those tumours and patients which are susceptible to treatment targetting MET kinase inhibition. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) has been successfully employed to identify patients with abnormal MET gene copy number with numerous probes available for use. Here we report a FISH protocol that reduces probe hybridisation time in NSCLC tissue to 1 hour and compare the results with other protocols. MET gene copy number was determined in 20 NSCLC cases using 3 FISH probes: 1. Kreatech FISH, MET (7q31) SE 7 ready to use probes, hybridised using an overnight protocol; 2. Dako MET IQFISH probe with CEP7 ready to use probe, hybridised for 2 hours; 3. Kreatech MET (7q31) SE 7 XL FISH probe, prepared in SwiftFISH buffer and hybridised for 1 hour. The MET gene copy number and MET: centromere 7 gene ratio were determined for each tissue and cases categorised as having MET high or MET low status. All three FISH probes were shown to demonstrate good agreement with each other. Overall percentage agreement between probes was ≥90%. Intraclass correlation showed good agreement (ICC ≥0.80) between all three assays for MET gene copy number and MET: centromere 7 gene ratio. These FISH protocols provide evidence that rapid laboratory developed FISH assays with short turnaround time perform consistently with standard protocols, potentially enabling faster treatment decisions.

Comparison of Dual-ISH (DISH) With Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) and Correlation With Immunohistochemical Findings for HER2/Neu Status in Breast Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The most widely used methods for determination of HER2/neu status in breast carcinoma are immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Both techniques are associated with technical and interpretive difficulties. Alternative methods exist including quantitative PCR and the newly developed chromogenic dual in situ hybridization (DISH).

METHODS

We evaluated HER2 DISH as an alternative to FISH and report our findings from 101 cases. In addition, we correlated HER2 DISH and FISH results with HercepTest and 4B5 immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Eight cases failed FISH analysis and none failed DISH analysis. A 95% (88/93) concordance was found between DISH and FISH for all cases in the series. When only 2+ IHC cases were evaluated, the concordance was 94% for DISH and FISH. Using the 2013 ASCO/CAP recommendations, none of the tested cases were equivocal by FISH or DISH despite 66% of cases being 2+ by HercepTest and 32% by the 4B5 antibody.

COMMENT

Our study, which utilizes a majority of IHC equivocal cases, demonstrates that HER2 FISH and DISH are concordant methodologies. HER2 DISH is therefore an acceptable alternative to FISH.

The Use of Nutraceuticals to Counteract Atherosclerosis: The Role of the Notch Pathway

Despite the currently available pharmacotherapies, today, thirty percent of worldwide deaths are due to cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), whose primary cause is atherosclerosis, an inflammatory disorder characterized by the buildup of lipid deposits on the inside of arteries. Multiple cellular signaling pathways have been shown to be involved in the processes underlying atherosclerosis, and evidence has been accumulating for the crucial role of Notch receptors in regulating the functions of the diverse cell types involved in atherosclerosis onset and progression. Several classes of nutraceuticals have potential benefits for the prevention and treatment of atherosclerosis and CVDs, some of which could in part be due to their ability to modulate the Notch pathway. In this review, we summarize the current state of knowledge on the role of Notch in vascular health and its modulation by nutraceuticals for the prevention of atherosclerosis and/or treatment of related CVDs.

What to expect from the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 guideline in the reflex in situ hybridization test of immunohistochemically equivocal 2+ cases?

To evaluate the effect of the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline in the identification of HER2-positive breast carcinomas (BC) in reflex in situ hybridization (ISH) test. A total of 592 primary invasive BC cases from before and after the publication of the updated ASCO/CAP guideline were evaluated for HER2 amplification by silver ISH according to the 2013 and 2018 guidelines. Cases were mostly (95%) HER2 equivocal by immunohistochemistry (IHC), not centrally reviewed. Other reasons for referring cases were IHC confirmation, IHC discordancy (either between needle-core-biopsy (NCB) and surgical excision specimen (SES) or between different laboratories) and IHC result unexpected for histopathologic features. Cases evaluated with the 2013 guideline (1st cohort) were 14.6% HER2-positive, decreasing significantly after the reclassification with the 2018 guideline due to the exclusion of group 2 cases without HER2 protein overexpression. Cases studied after the implementation of the 2018 guideline (2nd cohort) were 8.7% HER2-positive, a frequency that was not significantly different from the reclassification of the 1st cohort with the 2018 guideline. All cases referred for IHC confirmation had the expected ISH result. Cases with IHC discordancy between NCB and SES were ISH concordant. Only one out of 14 cases with an IHC score 3+ and classified as histological grade 1 or with a Ki67 below 10% was classified as ISH HER2-positive. The 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline resulted in a decrease of HER2-positive cases in reflex ISH test, selecting less patients for anti-HER2-targeted therapy.

Incorporating Biology Into Breast Cancer Staging: American Joint Committee on Cancer, Eighth Edition, Revisions and Beyond

Higher-quality imaging, refined surgical procedures, enhanced pathologic evaluation, and improved understanding of the impact of tumor biology on treatment and prognosis have necessitated revisions of the AJCC breast cancer staging system. The eighth edition includes clinical and pathologic prognostic stages that incorporate biologic variables-grade, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, HER2 status, and multigene panels-with the anatomic extent of disease defined by tumor, node, and metastasis categories. The prognostic staging systems facilitate more refined stratification with respect to survival than anatomic stage alone. Because the prognostic staging systems are dependent on biologic factors, accuracy is dependent on rigorous pathologic evaluation of tumors and on administration of treatment dictated by tumor biology. It is anticipated that technological advances will facilitate even more refined determination of underlying biology within tumors and in the peripheral blood, which increasingly is being evaluated as a compartment that reflects the primary tumor and sites of distant metastases. Diseases should be staged according to the eighth edition staging system to accurately reflect prognosis and to allow standardized data collection. Such standardization will facilitate assessment of the impact of advances in diagnosis and treatment of patients with breast cancer.

Reagent-saving immunohistochemistry for HER2 using non-contact alternating current electric field mixing

Aims

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted agents are an effective approach to treating patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. However, the lack of survival benefit in HER2-negative patients, as well as the toxic effects and high cost of the drugs, highlight the need for accurate and prompt assessment of HER2 status. Our aim was to evaluate the clinical utility of a novel reagent-saving immunohistochemistry method (AC-IHC) that saves HER2 antibody by taking advantage of the non-contact mixing effect in microdroplets subjected to an alternating current electric field.

Methods

Ninety-five specimens were used from patients diagnosed with primary breast cancers identified immunohistochemically as HER2 0/1+, 2+ or 3+ using ASCO/CAP guideline-certified standard IHC. The specimens were all tested using the conventional IHC method (1:50 antibody dilution) as well as AC-IHC (1:50 dilution) and reagent-saving AC-IHC (1:100 dilution).

Results

The reagent-saving AC-IHC produced stable results with less non-specific staining using smaller amounts of labelled antibody. Moreover, the staining and accuracy of HER2 status evaluated with the reagent-saving AC-IHC method was equal to that achieved with standard IHC.

Conclusions

These results suggest reagent-saving AC-IHC could be used as a clinical tool for accurate and stable HER2 IHC, even when reagent concentrations vary.

Clinical utility of RT-PCR in assessing HER 2 gene expression versus traditional IHC and FISH in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

IHC and FISH are used for categorizing HER 2 status in breast cancer at the protein and DNA level, respectively. HER 2 expression at the RNA level is quantitative, cheaper, easier to standardize and free from interobserver variation.

METHODS

115 consecutive patients were tested by IHC, FISH and RT-PCR (test cohort). Assuming FISH result to be the response variable, ROC curves for RT-PCR ratio were analyzed to label HER 2 negative, equivocal and positive cases as RT-PCR score 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Inter-relationships between RT-PCR, IHC and FISH were defined. 'Clinical benefit' of a test was defined as proportion of patients labeled unequivocally as HER 2 positive or negative. Population for 1 year was simulated constraint to previous reports of HER 2 positivity and IHC category distribution by a meta-analysis of previous studies that evaluated concordance between IHC and FISH to determine HER 2 status (simulation cohort). Four diagnostic pathways in the simulation cohort were defined-(1) initial IHC, followed by FISH (conventional pathway); (2) initial RT-PCR, followed by FISH; (3) initial IHC, followed by RT-PCR and then by FISH; (4) initial RT-PCR, followed by IHC and then by FISH. The clinical benefit of IHC and RT-PCR in the four pathways was analyzed and sensitivity analysis for incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and cost-benefit comapring RT-PCR against IHC, both as first-line tests and among those with IHC score 2 as a reflex second-line test was performed by the Monte Carlo technique.

FINDINGS

115 patients comprised the study population. While none with IHC score of 0 or 1 was FISH positive for HER 2, all cases with IHC score of 3 were FISH positive. 43 cases were assigned IHC score of 2. Thus, 72 patients benefited from the initial IHC testing [clinical benefit 62.6%], with the overall concordance between IHC and FISH being 100% for those with IHC score of 0, 1 and 3 (conclusive IHC categories). For RT-PCR with 100% concordance, 15.7% (115-97 = 18) patients would have benefited from RT-PCR testing if it was used as a first-line test. If RT-PCR would have been used as a second-line test among those with IHC score 2 (n = 43), then only 6 patients would have been assigned a conclusive RT-PCR category (category 1 or 3) translating to a clinical benefit of 14% (6/43) as a second-line test. As a second-line test it had 51% probability to prove more cost-effective than the conventional pathway, provided the cost of RT-PCR was 0.4 times the cost of IHC. Also in a three-step pathway, RT-PCR upfront would have 56% probability of higher cost-benefit provided the cost of RT-PCR was 0.1 times the cost of IHC.

CONCLUSION

RT-PCR results were found to be suboptimal to IHC in terms of discriminative ability and clinical benefit; thus, it is unlikely to replace IHC as a first-line test in the near future.

Utility of Alternate, Noncentromeric Chromosome 17 Reference Probe for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Testing in Breast Cancer Cases

Context PathVysion-a US Food and Drug Administration-approved dual-probe human epidermal growth factor receptor ( HER2) fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay-provides the HER2: CEP17 ratio, a centromeric enumeration probe ratio for determining HER2 status in breast cancers. However, pericentromeric amplifications might then skew the HER2: CEP17 ratio, underestimating the HER2 status, which calls into question the use of CEP17 as the reference probe. Objective To analyze the utility of a noncentromeric chromosome 17 reference locus ( D17S122) to assess HER2 gene status in cases showing "nonclassical" FISH patterns with the CEP17 probe. Design The HER2 status of breast cancers accessioned in the years 2015-2017, displaying "nonclassical" or "equivocal" results by the PathVysion (Abbott Molecular Inc, Des Plaines, Illinois) HER2 DNA Probe Kit were reflex tested using an alternate FISH probe (ZytoLight SPEC/D17S122, ZytoVision, Bremerhaven, Germany) and interpreted with American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists 2013 guidelines. Results Of 37 cases, 17 were FISH equivocal. With the alternate D17S122 probe, 13 (76.4%) were reclassified as amplified, 3 (17.6%) as nonamplified, and a single case retained an equivocal result. Of the 17 cases with a chromosome 17 polysomy pattern, disomy, polysomy, and monosomy patterns were seen with 14 cases, 2 cases, and 1 case, respectively. Within the 17 cases with polysomy pattern, 3 (17.6%) demonstrated an unusual colocalization pattern of HER2 and CEP17, which was not observed with the alternate probe. Conclusions The denominator-stable alternate probe is a useful adjunct in the diagnostic armamentarium to analyze HER2 status in cases with FISH equivocal and complex patterns.

A nomogram to predict HER2 status in breast cancer patients with HER2-borderline disease as determined via immunohistochemistry

This study aimed to develop a nomogram to predict fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay results for HER2-borderline breast cancer as determined via immunohistochemistry (IHC) among patients in China. We reviewed a database of breast cancer patients diagnosed between January 2007 and April 2013 at our institutions. We used logistic regression to develop a nomogram and we used receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and calibration plots to validate our nomogram. In total, 1138, 301 and 344 patients had IHC-determined HER2-negative, HER2-borderline and HER2-positive disease, respectively. Within the training cohort, univariate and multivariate analyses suggested that estrogen receptor (ER) status, progesterone receptor (PR) status and tumor grade were significantly associated with HER2 status (P<0.01). A nomogram was developed and the AUCs for the training and validation cohorts were 0.795 and 0.749, respectively. The calibration plots suggested that the model was well calibrated. This new nomogram can be used to predict HER2 status in HER2-borderline breast cancer patients and will be particularly helpful to resource-limited countries.

HER2/neu Testing In 432 Consecutive Breast Cancer Cases using FISH and IHC - A Comparative Study

INTRODUCTION

The development of trastuzumab, a HER-2/neu targeted monoclonal antibody resulted in significant improvements in clinical response and survival in HER-2/neu gene amplified group of patients. Thus, accurate assessment of HER-2/neu status becomes critical. Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) and Immunohistochemistry (IHC) are the most commonly used methods for this purpose and specific recommendations exist with regard to the concordance to be observed between the two tests.

AIM

Here, we report and evaluate the concordance rate between FISH and IHC for HER-2/neu status in breast cancer specimens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Archival paraffin blocks of tumour tissue from 450 patients of breast cancer were analyzed for Her-2/neu status using FISH and IHC.

RESULTS

There was a highly significant concordance between the results of FISH and IHC assays in HER-2/neu status assessment in invasive breast cancer cases. There were inverse associations between the expression of Oestrogen Receptors/Progesterone Receptors (ER/PR) and HER-2/neu amplification.

CONCLUSION

Although, IHC gave significant concordant results with FISH in determining HER-2/neu status, its subjective grading system precludes its use as a gold standard. FISH should always be used to determine true gene amplification when the IHC results are equivocal.

Well-differentiated invasive breast cancers with equivocal HER2 immunohistochemistry: what is the yield of routine reflex in-situ hybridization testing?

AIMS

The 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) HER2 guidelines recommend testing all invasive breast cancers for HER2, typically with immunohistochemistry (IHC) followed by in-situ hybridization (ISH) when IHC is equivocal. As well-differentiated breast cancers are rarely HER2-positive, we assessed the value of routine reflex HER2 ISH testing for this subset of breast cancers.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We collected HER2 IHC 2+ cases and fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) data from primary breast cancers with well-differentiated tumour types (grade 1 ductal carcinomas, classic lobular carcinomas, tubular, cribriform and pure mucinous carcinomas) at our centre from 2010 to 2015. Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and IHC slides were reviewed to confirm tumour type, grade and IHC score based on ASCO/CAP 2013 guidelines and their recent revisions. Of 4633 invasive carcinomas, 1133 had a well-differentiated tumour type; 177 of these were HER2 IHC equivocal, three of which were low-level amplified by FISH (0.3% of all well-differentiated tumours). One amplified case was classic invasive lobular carcinoma and two were invasive ductal carcinomas, grade 1. One amplified case had chromosome 17 monosomy, and one was rescored as HER2 IHC 1+ upon review. 'Basolateral' staining was noted in one amplified case and in 65 of 174 (37.4%) non-amplified cases. This incomplete membranous staining pattern was observed in the majority of invasive ductal carcinomas that were rescored as 1+ according to the revised 2013 guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of HER2 amplification among well-differentiated breast cancers is very low. Basolateral staining in well-differentiated tumours may be overinterpreted as HER2 IHC 2+, but is rarely associated with HER2 amplification.

Discrepancies in central review re-testing of patients with ER-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer in the OPTIMA prelim randomised clinical trial

Background:

There is limited data on results of central re-testing of samples from patients with invasive breast cancer categorised in their local hospital laboratories as oestrogen receptor (ER) positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor homologue 2 (HER2) negative.

Methods:

The Optimal Personalised Treatment of early breast cancer usIng Multiparameter Analysis preliminary study (OPTIMA prelim) was the feasibility phase of a randomised controlled trial to validate the use of multiparameter assay-directed chemotherapy decisions in the UK National Health Service (NHS). Eligibility criteria included ER positivity and HER2 negativity. Central re-testing of receptor status was mandatory.

Results:

Of the 431 patients tested centrally, discrepant results between central and local laboratory results were identified in only 19 (4.4% 95% confidence interval 2.5–6.3%) patients (with 21 tumours). On central review, seven patients had cancers that were ER-negative (1.6%) and 13 (3.0%) patients with 15 tumours had HER2-positive disease, including one tumour discrepant for both biomarkers.

Conclusions:

Central re-testing of receptor status of invasive breast cancers in the UK NHS setting shows a high level of reproducibility in categorising tumours as ER-positive and HER2-negative, and raises questions regarding the cost effectiveness and clinical value of central re-testing in this sub-group of breast cancers in this setting.

Gene amplification of CCNE1, CCND1, and CDK6 in gastric cancers detected by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and fluorescence in situ hybridization

New and effective treatments for advanced gastric cancer are urgently needed. Cyclins E and D1 form a complex with cyclin-dependent kinase 2, 4, or 6 to regulate G1-S transition. The G1-S regulatory genes encoding cyclin E (CCNE1), cyclin D1 (CCND1), and CDK6 (CDK6) are frequently amplified in gastric cancer and may therefore influence molecularly targeted therapies against ERBB2 or EGFR when coamplified. A total of 179 formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded gastric cancer specimens were examined for these gene amplifications by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Amplification of at least 1 G1-S regulatory gene was found in 35 tumors (CCNE1 amplification, 15% of samples; CCND1, 6%; CDK6, 1%). In 13 of the 35 tumors, dual-color fluorescence in situ hybridization identified coamplification of the G1-S regulatory genes with ERBB2, EGFR, and/or KRAS in single cancer nuclei. The observation that cells with G1-S regulatory gene amplification contained clonal subpopulations with coamplification of ERBB2, EGFR, or KRAS in 5 early and 3 advanced cancers suggests that amplification of the G1-S regulatory genes represents an early event, which precedes ERBB2, EGFR, or KRAS amplification. Amplified CCNE1, CCND1, and CDK6 in advanced gastric cancer may be potentially useful as direct targets for molecular therapy or for combination therapy with ERBB2 or EGFR inhibitors. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification could be a useful tool for identification of patients who would benefit from such therapies.

Inconsistent Results With Different Secondary Reflex Assays for Resolving HER2 Status

OBJECTIVES

Guidelines suggest that secondary reflex testing may be useful for resolving HER2 status in breast cancers with equivocal results by both immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH). We compared two reflex ISH assays and a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for this application.

METHODS

Twenty-nine breast cancers with equivocal IHC and ISH results were retested two ways: (1) ISH using differentially labeled probes targeting ERBB2 ( HER2 , 17q12) and either RAI1 (17p11.2) or ORC4 (2q22.3-2q23.1) in two separate assays and (2) real-time quantitative PCR amplification of ERBB2 and a control locus ( EIF5B , 2q11.2).

RESULTS

Results of the HER2 / RAI1 and HER2 / ORC4 ISH assays were concordant for 21 (72%) cases, and results of all three secondary reflex assays were concordant for only 18 (62%) cases. Result discrepancies between the two ISH readers were observed for cases close to the cutoff threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of different control loci for ISH is associated with discordant results, and PCR is more likely to classify cases as nonamplified, possibly due to contamination with nontumor cells. While resolution of HER2 -equivocal results is desirable from a clinical perspective, different secondary reflex assays yield different results, and the correlation of these results with clinical outcomes is unknown.

Genomic Copy Number Analysis of HER2-Equivocal Breast Cancers

OBJECTIVES

Guidelines for HER2 testing define an equivocal range for HER2 using two approved testing methods, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH). We investigated genome-wide copy number alterations in this subgroup.

METHODS

Ten breast cancers with equivocal HER2 status by both IHC and ISH were analyzed by single-nucleotide polymorphism cytogenomic microarray (SNP array). DNA ploidy analysis by flow cytometry was performed on nine cases with sufficient material remaining.

RESULTS

SNP array analysis showed uniform gain of chromosome 17 (polysomy) in one case and segmental copy number gains encompassing HER2 and the centromere in five other cases. Flow cytometry revealed hyperdiploidy in six cases, all but one of which also had HER2 gains on SNP array. Although there was no evidence of HER2 amplification by SNP array, six cases showed amplification of other genomic regions, including known oncogenes in four cases.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of hyperdiploidy and segmental copy number gains contributes to HER2 ISH-equivocal results in most breast cancers. Cases in which HER2 copy number gain is not corroborated by genomic analysis suggest the presence of other contributing variables influencing ISH results. Genomic copy number analysis also implicates non-HER2 oncogenic drivers in many cases that are HER2 equivocal.

FISH testing of HER2 immunohistochemistry 1+ invasive breast cancer with unfavorable characteristics

Diagnostic assays for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression have a high predictive value because patients with HER2-positive tumors could benefit from HER2-targeted therapy. The aim of the present study is to analyze the incidence of HER2 gene amplification in selected tumors with adverse features that scored 1+ by immunohistochemistry (IHC). For that purpose, 331 consecutive invasive breast cancers (IBCs) were tested by IHC for HER2 expression between January and December 2013, 102 of which (31%) scored 1+. Of these 102 women with IBC who underwent surgery, 75 entered the study (73.5%). A total of 48 out of 75 (64%) IBC samples (patients' median age, 60.75 years) were selected according to ≥1 unfavorable tumor characteristics, and tested by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Of these 48 IBC samples scoring 1+ by IHC, 22 (46%) exhibited high histological grade (G3), 23 (48%) had a high proliferative index (Ki-67, >30%), 27 (56%) showed vascular invasion and 32 out of 41 evaluable cases (78%) were node-positive. Regarding hormone receptor expression, 3 (6%) and 10 (21%) cases were negative for estrogen and progesterone receptors expression, respectively. FISH was performed on 48 IBC cases scoring 1+ by IHC, and 7 infiltrating ductal carcinomas (IDCs) (14.6%) demonstrated HER2 amplification with a high proliferative index. In 42 IDC samples, statistical analysis evidenced a significant association between histological grade and high proliferative index (P=0.0200). In addition, in 48 HER2 scoring 1+ IBCs, Fisher's exact test evidenced a significant association between the presence of gene amplification and high proliferative index (P=0.0033). Based on these biopathological parameters, particularly a high proliferative index, the present results indicate that it is possible to of identify tumors scoring 1+ by IHC with HER2 amplification by FISH, thus aiding the selection of patients who are suitable for HER2-targeted therapy according to an acceptable cost/benefit ratio.

Determining HER2 (ERBB2) amplification status in women with breast cancer: final results from the Australian in situ hybridisation program

Appropriate and accurate determination of HER2 status in women with breast cancer is critical for stratifying anti-HER2 therapies, and for access to subsidised treatment in the Australian setting. We conducted a regulated, nationwide program providing HER2 in situ hybridisation (ISH) testing for patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Cases with equivocal or non-diagnostic ISH test results at the local laboratory were sent to a high volume central testing laboratory for analysis using fluorescence ISH (FISH). We tested 78,408 early breast cancers and 3469 metastatic cancers using ISH. Of these, 12,405 early breast cancers (15.8%) and 798 metastatic cancers (23.0%) were HER2 positive. During the testing period, the proportion of core biopsy samples increased, the number of repeat tests remained stable and testing turnaround time declined. Discordant 3+ IHC, ISH negative results dropped from 20% to 13% in early breast cancers and from 35% to 8% among metastatic breast cancers. Following central laboratory FISH testing only 87 samples remained non-diagnostic (1.9% of FISH-tested samples, 0.1% of the whole cohort), most being decalcified specimens. This is a successful story of a cohesive service determining HER2 status in women with breast cancer in a 'real-world' setting.

Novel method for rapid in-situ hybridization of HER2 using non-contact alternating-current electric-field mixing

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted agents are an effective approach to treating HER2-positive breast cancer patients. However, the lack of survival benefit in HER2-negative patients as well as the toxic effects and high cost of the drugs highlight the need for accurate and prompt assessment of HER2 status. Our aim was to evaluate the clinical utility of a novel rapid dual in-situ hybridization (RISH) method developed to facilitate hybridization. The method takes advantage of the non-contact mixing effect of an alternating current (AC) electric field. One hundred sixty-three specimens were used from patients diagnosed with primary breast cancers identified immunohistochemically as HER2 0/1(+), (2+) or (3+). The specimens were all tested using conventional dual in-situ hybridization (DISH), DISH with an automated slide stainer, and RISH. With RISH the HER2 test was completed within 6 h, as compared to 20–22 h needed for the standard protocol. Although RISH produced results more promptly using smaller amounts of labeled antibody, the staining and accuracy of HER2 status evaluation with RISH was equal to or greater than with DISH. These results suggest RISH could be used as a clinical tool to promptly determine HER2 status.

Dual PET and Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging Probes as Tools for Imaging in Oncology

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to summarize advances in PET fluorescence resolution, agent design, and preclinical imaging that make a growing case for clinical PET fluorescence imaging.

CONCLUSION

Existing SPECT, PET, fluorescence, and MRI contrast imaging techniques are already deeply integrated into the management of cancer, from initial diagnosis to the observation and management of metastases. Combined positron-emitting fluorescent contrast agents can convey new or substantial benefits that improve on these proven clinical contrast agents.

Changes of heterogeneous cell populations in the Ishikawa cell line during long-term culture: Proposal for an in vitro clonal evolution model of tumor cells

Genomic changes in tumor cell lines can occur during culture, leading to differences between cell lines carrying the same name. In this study, genome profiles between low and high passages were investigated in the Ishikawa 3-H-12 cell line (JCRB1505). Cells contained between 43 and 46 chromosomes and the modal number changed from 46 to 45 during culture. Cytogenetic analysis revealed that a translocation t(9;14), observed in all metaphases, is a robust marker for this cell line. Single-nucleotide polymorphism microarrays showed a heterogeneous copy number in the early passages and distinct profiles at late passages. These results demonstrate that cell culture can lead to elimination of ancestral clones by sequential selection, resulting in extensive replacement with a novel clone. Our observations on Ishikawa cells in vitro are different from the in vivo heterogeneity in which ancestral clones are often retained during tumor evolution and suggest a model for in vitro clonal evolution.

Improving gastric cancer preclinical studies using diverse in vitro and in vivo model systems

BACKGROUND

"Biomarker-driven targeted therapy," the practice of tailoring patients' treatment to the expression/activity levels of disease-specific genes/proteins, remains challenging. For example, while the anti-ERBB2 monoclonal antibody, trastuzumab, was first developed using well-characterized, diverse in vitro breast cancer models (and is now a standard adjuvant therapy for ERBB2-positive breast cancer patients), trastuzumab approval for ERBB2-positive gastric cancer was largely based on preclinical studies of a single cell line, NCI-N87. Ensuing clinical trials revealed only modest patient efficacy, and many ERBB2-positive gastric cancer (GC) patients failed to respond at all (i.e., were inherently recalcitrant), or succumbed to acquired resistance.

METHOD

To assess mechanisms underlying GC insensitivity to ERBB2 therapies, we established a diverse panel of GC cells, differing in ERBB2 expression levels, for comprehensive in vitro and in vivo characterization. For higher throughput assays of ERBB2 DNA and protein levels, we compared the concordance of various laboratory quantification methods, including those of in vitro and in vivo genetic anomalies (FISH and SISH) and xenograft protein expression (Western blot vs. IHC), of both cell and xenograft (tissue-sectioned) microarrays.

RESULTS

The biomarker assessment methods strongly agreed, as did correlation between RNA and protein expression. However, although ERBB2 genomic anomalies showed good in vitro vs. in vivo correlation, we observed striking differences in protein expression between cultured cells and mouse xenografts (even within the same GC cell type). Via our unique pathway analysis, we delineated a signaling network, in addition to specific pathways/biological processes, emanating from the ERBB2 signaling cascade, as a potential useful target of clinical treatment. Integrated analysis of public data from gastric tumors revealed frequent (10 - 20 %) amplification of the genes NFKBIE, PTK2, and PIK3CA, each of which resides in an ERBB2-derived subpathway network.

CONCLUSION

Our comprehensive bioinformatics analyses of highly heterogeneous cancer cells, combined with tumor "omics" profiles, can optimally characterize the expression patterns and activity of specific tumor biomarkers. Subsequent in vitro and in vivo validation, of specific disease biomarkers (using multiple methodologies), can improve prediction of patient stratification according to drug response or nonresponse.

Optimal Scoring of Brightfield Dual-Color In Situ Hybridization for Evaluation of HER2 Amplification in Breast Carcinoma: How Many Cells Are Enough?

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the optimum number of cells that should be counted when scoring human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) brightfield dual-color in situ hybridization (BDISH), including cases with HER2/chromosome 17 (Chr17) ratios in the 1.80 to 2.20 range.

METHODS IN TOTAL,

131 cases of breast carcinoma with HER2 immunohistochemistry and BDISH were included. For cases with a HER2/Chr17 ratio of less than 1.80 or more than 2.20 (n = 115), BDISH scoring was performed for 60 cells using three tumor fields, and for cases with a HER2/Chr17 ratio of 1.80 to 2.20 (n = 16), scoring was performed for 120 cells using six tumor fields. Mean HER2/Chr17 ratio and HER2 copy number were calculated for cumulative cell counts.

RESULTS

The HER2 status as determined by the HER2/Chr17 ratio or HER2 copy number was unchanged following counting of additional cells in 100% of cases with ratio of less than 1.80 or more than 2.20. The HER2 status of two cases with ratios of 1.80 to 2.20 changed from positive to negative following counting of 120 cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support recommendations to score 20 nuclei in conjunction with careful assessment of immunohistochemistry and scan of the BDISH slide to identify areas of heterogeneity. Scoring of additional cells/fields is likely not of benefit and might be a disadvantage since the scorer moves out of the area of strongest signal.

Application of the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline and the SISH technique for HER2 testing of breast cancer selects more patients for anti-HER2 treatment

The aim of this study is to assess the impact of changes of the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline on the results of HER2 testing in breast cancer. A series of 916 primary invasive breast cancer cases, assessed as HER2 2+ by IHC in part using the 2007 and in part the 2013 ASCO/CAP criteria, was evaluated for HER2 amplification status by SISH and classified according to both 2007 and 2013 ASCO/CAP ISH guideline criteria. We observed a significant increase of HER2-positive cases (12.4 to 16.8%) and a decrease of HER2-equivocal cases (3.6 to 0.7%). Of the cases studied, 52.1% fulfilled both criteria of HER2/CEP17 ratio and average HER2 copy number per cell to be classified as HER2-positive. Reclassification of the cases from before the introduction of the new ASCO/CAP guideline with the 2013 ISH criteria resulted in an increase of cases with a HER2-positive status (12.4 to 14.2%) and in a decrease of HER2-equivocal cases (3.6 to 1.6%). The 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline selects more patients for anti-HER2 targeted therapy, mostly based on the modifications of criteria to evaluate ISH-HER2.

Reflex Repeat HER2 Testing of Grade 3 Breast Carcinoma at Excision Using Immunohistochemistry and In Situ Analysis: Frequency of HER2 Discordance and Utility of Core Needle Biopsy Parameters to Refine Case Selection

OBJECTIVES

The updated American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines (2013) for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing in breast cancer recommend repeat testing at excision of HER2-negative grade 3 breast tumors. This study aimed to identify the rate of HER2 discordance in this cohort of cases.

METHODS

All HER2-negative grade 3 tumors diagnosed at a single institution over a 15-month period had reflex repeat HER2 testing at excision : HER2 testing was performed in accordance with ASCO/CAP guidelines using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and dual in situ hybridization (ISH).

RESULTS

One hundred cases were identified over the study period. HER2 was amplified at excision in three cases. The discordant tumors showed equivocal IHC at excision with low-level amplification on dual ISH. All discordant cases showed equivocal IHC on core needle biopsy (CNB) specimens and/or tumor upgrade at excision.

CONCLUSIONS

Our series demonstrated a high concordance rate (97%) for HER2 at excision in grade 3 breast tumors with a negative core biopsy result. These findings suggest that reflex repeat HER2 testing of all these cases, which has significant cost and workload implications, may not be justified. Features that may indicate HER2 heterogeneity, such as equivocal IHC on CNB specimens or tumor upgrade at excision, may help refine selection of cases for repeat testing.

Free digital image analysis software helps to resolve equivocal scores in HER2 immunohistochemistry

Evaluation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry (IHC) is subject to interobserver variation and lack of reproducibility. Digital image analysis (DIA) has been shown to improve the consistency and accuracy of the evaluation and its use is encouraged in current testing guidelines. We studied whether digital image analysis using a free software application (ImmunoMembrane) can assist in interpreting HER2 IHC in equivocal 2+ cases. We also compared digital photomicrographs with whole-slide images (WSI) as material for ImmunoMembrane DIA. We stained 750 surgical resection specimens of invasive breast cancers immunohistochemically for HER2 and analysed staining with ImmunoMembrane. The ImmunoMembrane DIA scores were compared with the originally responsible pathologists' visual scores, a researcher's visual scores and in situ hybridisation (ISH) results. The originally responsible pathologists reported 9.1 % positive 3+ IHC scores, for the researcher this was 8.4 % and for ImmunoMembrane 9.5 %. Equivocal 2+ scores were 34 % for the pathologists, 43.7 % for the researcher and 10.1 % for ImmunoMembrane. Negative 0/1+ scores were 57.6 % for the pathologists, 46.8 % for the researcher and 80.8 % for ImmunoMembrane. There were six false positive cases, which were classified as 3+ by ImmunoMembrane and negative by ISH. Six cases were false negative defined as 0/1+ by IHC and positive by ISH. ImmunoMembrane DIA using digital photomicrographs and WSI showed almost perfect agreement. In conclusion, digital image analysis by ImmunoMembrane can help to resolve a majority of equivocal 2+ cases in HER2 IHC, which reduces the need for ISH testing.

HER2 testing and its predictive utility in anti-HER2 breast cancer therapy

Breast cancer treatment is dependent on accurate pathologic diagnosis. HER2 testing is now universally recommended as part of evaluation of invasive breast cancer. HER2 testing is available via various slide and non-slide based assays, and interpretation of results continues to evolve. Herein we review these testing modalities and their incorporation into the 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines. Once accurate HER2 status has been established the proper treatment based on recent clinical trials can be instituted.

The New Equivocal: Changes to HER2 FISH Results When Applying the 2013 ASCO/CAP Guidelines

OBJECTIVES

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2, ERBB2) testing is an important prognostic/predictive marker in breast cancer management, especially in selecting HER2-targeted treatment. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines address HER2 status and were recently revised in 2013, replacing the 2007 version. For in situ hybridization interpretation, 2013 guidelines return to the prior threshold of a HER2/CEP17 ratio of 2.0 or greater for positive and eliminate 1.8 to 2.2 as the equivocal range. Also, the HER2 signal/nucleus ratio is accounted for, with 6.0 or greater for positive and 4.0 to less than 6.0 for equivocal, even in cases with a HER2/CEP17 ratio less than 2.0.

METHODS

With institutional review board approval, we reviewed our 2006 to 2012 HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results and classified them according to both the 2007 and 2013 guidelines as negative, positive, or equivocal.

RESULTS

Of 717 HER2 FISH results, 55 (7.7%) changed category when reassessed by 2013 guidelines. Nineteen of 25 results in the 2007 equivocal category were reassigned as positive (n = 13) or negative (n = 6). Thirty-five previously negative cases became equivocal in the 2013 scheme, 12 of these with 1+ immunohistochemistry. The positive category increased from 71 to 85.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines increased the number of HER2 FISH positive and equivocal results. The equivocal group is substantially different, posing a dilemma for clinical management.

Semi-comprehensive analysis of gene amplification in gastric cancers using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and fluorescence in situ hybridization

The prognosis of patients with gastric carcinomas at an advanced stage still remains dismal, and therefore novel therapeutic modalities are urgently needed. Since the successful targeting of amplified ERBB2 with a humanized monoclonal antibody, the amplified genes of other receptor tyrosine kinases such as EGFR, FGFR2, and MET, as well as those of other cell regulator genes, are being considered as candidate targets of molecular therapy. The aim of the present study was to determine the amplification status of 26 genes, which are frequently amplified in solid cancers, in advanced gastric cancers. A total of 93 formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded advanced gastric cancer tissues were examined by multiple ligation-dependent probe amplification, and 32 cases with 'gain' or 'amplified' status of 16 genes were further examined for the respective gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and for the respective protein overexpression by immunohistochemistry. The frequencies of gene amplifications in advanced gastric cancers were as follows: ERBB2 (13 cases, 14%), FGFR2 (7 cases, 8%), MYC (7 cases, 8%), TOP2A (7 cases, 8%), MET (4 cases, 4%), MDM2 (4 cases, 4%), CCND1 (3 cases, 3%), FGF10 (2 cases, 3%), and EGFR (1 case, 1%). Amplification of the receptor tyrosine kinases genes occurred in a mutually exclusive manner except for one tumor in which ERBB2 and FGFR2 were both amplified but in different cancer cells. Co-amplification of ERBB2 and MYC, and EGFR and CCND1, in single nuclei but on different amplicons, was confirmed in one case each. Attempts at correlating the FISH status with the immunohistochemical staining pattern showed variable results from complete concordance to no correlation. In conclusion, combination of multiple ligation-dependent probe amplification and FISH analysis is a feasible approach for obtaining the semi-comprehensive genetic information that is necessary for personalized molecular targeted therapy.

Identification of a Low-Risk Luminal A Breast Cancer Cohort That May Not Benefit From Breast Radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To determine the prognostic and predictive value of intrinsic subtyping by using immunohistochemical (IHC) biomarkers for ipsilateral breast relapse (IBR) in participants in an early breast cancer randomized trial of tamoxifen with or without breast radiotherapy (RT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

IHC analysis of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), cytokeratin 5/6, epidermal growth factor receptor, and Ki-67 was conducted on 501 of 769 available blocks. Patients were classified as luminal A (n = 265), luminal B (n = 165), or high-risk subtype (luminal HER2, n = 22; HER2 enriched, n = 13; basal like, n = 30; or triple-negative nonbasal, n = 6). Median follow-up was 10 years.

RESULTS

Classification by subtype was prognostic for IBR (10-year estimates: luminal A, 5.2%; luminal B, 10.5%; high-risk subtypes, 21.3%; P < .001). Luminal subtypes seemed to derive less benefit from RT (luminal A hazard ratio [HR], 0.40; luminal B HR, 0.51) than high-risk subtypes (HR, 0.13); however, the overall subtype-treatment interaction term was not significant (P = .26). In an exploratory analysis of women with clinical low-risk (age older than 60 years, T1, grade 1 or 2) luminal A tumors (n = 151), 10-year IBR was 3.1% versus 11.8% for the high-risk cohort (n = 341; P = .0063). Clinical low-risk luminal A patients had a 10-year IBR of 1.3% with tamoxifen versus 5.0% with tamoxifen plus RT (P = .42). Multivariable analysis showed that RT (HR, 0.31; P < .001), clinical risk group (HR, 2.2; P = .025), and luminal A subtype (HR, 0.25; P < .001) were significantly associated with IBR.

CONCLUSION

IHC subtyping was prognostic for IBR but was not predictive of benefit from RT. Further studies may validate the exploratory finding of a low-risk luminal A group who may be spared breast RT.

Gene protein detection platform--a comparison of a new human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 assay with conventional immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization platforms

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are widely used semiquantitative assays for selecting breast cancer patients for HER2 antibody therapy. However, both techniques have been shown to have disadvantages. Our aim was to test a recent automated technique of combined IHC and brightfield dual in situ hybridization-gene protein detection platform (GPDP)-in breast cancer HER2 protein, gene, and chromosome 17 centromere status evaluations, comparing the results in accordance to the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists recommendations for HER2 testing in breast cancer from both 2007 and 2013. The GPDP technique performance was evaluated on 52 consecutive whole slide invasive breast cancer cases with HER2 IHC 2/3+ scoring results. Applying in turns the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists recommendations for HER2 testing in breast cancer from 2007 and 2013 to both FISH and GPDP DISH assays, the HER2 gene amplification results showed 100% concordance among amplified/nonamplified cases, but there was a shift in 4 cases toward positive from equivocal results and toward equivocal from negative results. This might be related to the emphasis on the average HER2 copy number in the 2013 criteria. HER2 expression by IVD market IHC kit (Pathway®) has a strong correlation with GPDP HER2 protein, including a full concordance for all cases scored as 3+ and a reduction from 2+ to 1+ in 7 cases corresponding to nonamplified cases. Gene protein detection platform HER2 protein "solo" could have spared the need for 7 FISH studies. In addition, the platform offered advantages on interpretation reassurance including selecting areas for counting gene signals paralleled with protein IHC expression, on heterogeneity detection, interpretation time, technical time, and tissue expense.

HER2 in solid tumors: more than 10 years under the microscope; where are we now?

HER2 is a well-recognized mediator of the cancerogenic process. It is dysregulated in a wide range of solid tumors, mainly via protein overexpression and/or gene amplification, thus making HER2 an attractive target for tailored treatment. The anti-HER2 therapy trastuzumab was approved for the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients more than 10 years ago. Since then, trastuzumab and other HER2-inhibitors have been entered into clinical practice for the treatment of breast cancer and, more recently, have been approved to treat HER2-positive metastatic gastric cancers. Currently, HER2-targeted therapies are under evaluation in other tumor types. Due to the relevance of proper patient selection, the accurate assessment of HER2 status is fundamental. This review will discuss the established knowledge and novel insights into the HER2 story, mainly focusing on breast, gastric and colorectal cancers, as well as providing a brief overview of salivary gland, bladder, ovarian and lung tumors.

Assessing the HER2 status in mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer on the basis of the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline update

Her2 gene amplification and protein overexpression are important factors in predicting clinical sensitivity to anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody therapy in breast, gastric, or gastro-esophageal junction cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the HER2 status in the mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Adopting the 2013 American Society for Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists guideline update for HER2 testing, 49 tissue microarray samples of mucinous EOC were analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) tests. The prevalence of HER2 positivity in Asian mucinous EOC was 9 of 49 Asian women (18.37%). The overall concordance was 100% between IHC and FISH results. Her2 gene copies before chromosome-17 correction increased significantly in a stepwise order through the negative, equivocal, and positive IHC result categories (P<0.001), as did the Her2 gene copies after chromosome-17 correction (P<0.001). Of the Taiwanese cohort (n=21), HER2 heterogeneity was 4.76% (1/21) in all but 14.26% (1/7) in HER2-positive cancer. In conclusion, we demonstrated that the prevalence of HER2 positivity in both Asian and white women was comparable; complete HER2 concordance existed between IHC and FISH tests for the Her2 gene copies per tumor cell either before or after correction of chromosome-17, and this can be applied as a potentially valuable tool to analyze the HER2 status. Polysomy-17 was absent under the CEP17 cutoff ≥3. The existence of HER2 heterogeneity can be discerned in certain HER2-expressed primary mucinous EOC in Taiwanese women.

A critical review of HER2-positive gastric cancer evaluation and treatment: from trastuzumab, and beyond

Identification of the importance of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) status, biomarker testing and the development of anti-HER2 treatments have changed the prognosis of breast and gastric cancers. The addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy has improved outcomes for patients with HER2-positive metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach and gastroesophageal junction, but some relevant issues remain to be elucidated or will emerge with new drugs. This article reviews the current state of HER2 in gastric cancer focusing on diagnostic and anti-HER2 targeted treatment issues and the role of trastuzumab in localized disease, and its combination or integration with new therapies.

Impact of HER2 copy number in IHC2+/FISH-amplified breast cancer on outcome of adjuvant trastuzumab treatment in a large UK cancer network

Background:

Adjuvant trastuzumab with chemotherapy is standard treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer, defined as either HER2 IHC3+ or IHC2+ and FISH amplified. The aim of this study was to investigate the degree to which HER2 amplification in terms of HER2 gene copy numbers in HER2+IHC2+ cancers affected the outcome in a community setting.

Methods:

Case records of 311 consecutive patients with early breast cancer presenting between 1st January 2005 and 31st December 2008 were reviewed. Progression-free survival and overall survival were calculated with the Kaplan–Meier method using STATA 13.

Results:

Among 3+ cases (n=230) 163 received T vs 67 no-T. Among 2+ cases (n=81) 59 received T vs 22 no-T. Among 59 IHC2+-treated cases n=28 had an average of >12, n=13 had >6 to <12, and n=18 had >2 to <6 HER2 gene copies, respectively. The time of progression and overall survival of high and low copy number patients was similar and better than the intermediate copy number and the untreated cohorts.

Conclusions:

High HER2 copy number (>12) appears to be associated with consistently better response compared with patients with intermediate HER2 copy numbers (6–12). In light of emerging data of patients showing insensivity to trastuzumab therapy, we propose that the HER2 gene copy number value should be included as an additional indicator for stratifying both the management and the follow-up of breast cancer patients.

Virtual tissue microarrays: a novel and viable approach to optimizing tissue microarrays for biomarker research applied to ductal carcinoma in situ

AIMS

Tissue microarrays (TMAs) are effective tools for performing high-throughput standardization analyses of biomarkers, but evidence indicating the core number required to be representative of the whole tumour is lacking. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-obligate precursor of invasive breast cancer. The number and size of cores that can best represent a DCIS lesion are unknown. Rather than performing extensive experiments using several variants of physical TMAs, the aim of this study was to develop a 'virtual TMA' approach that is effective at optimizing biomarker discovery and validation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Whole DCIS sections from 95 patients were evaluated by immunohistochemistry for oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), HER2, and Ki67. Histoscores were generated manually for ER, PgR, and HER2, as well as percentage positivity for Ki67. Slides were scanned using the FDA-approved Ariol SL50 Image Analysis system, and the virtual array (V-Array) module was used. Virtual cores created virtual TMAs, and our validated scoring classifiers were applied. Automated histoscores and percentage positivity were determined, and compared against increasing numbers of cores. The optimal number of cores was based on concordant results between virtual TMAs and corresponding whole sections.

CONCLUSIONS

We have shown that virtual arrays constitute an important tool in digital pathology in both research and clinical settings.

Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update

PURPOSE

To update the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing in breast cancer to improve the accuracy of HER2 testing and its utility as a predictive marker in invasive breast cancer.

METHODS

ASCO/CAP convened an Update Committee that included coauthors of the 2007 guideline to conduct a systematic literature review and update recommendations for optimal HER2 testing.

RESULTS

The Update Committee identified criteria and areas requiring clarification to improve the accuracy of HER2 testing by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or in situ hybridization (ISH). The guideline was reviewed and approved by both organizations.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The Update Committee recommends that HER2 status (HER2 negative or positive) be determined in all patients with invasive (early stage or recurrence) breast cancer on the basis of one or more HER2 test results (negative, equivocal, or positive). Testing criteria define HER2-positive status when (on observing within an area of tumor that amounts to >10% of contiguous and homogeneous tumor cells) there is evidence of protein overexpression (IHC) or gene amplification (HER2 copy number or HER2/CEP17 ratio by ISH based on counting at least 20 cells within the area). If results are equivocal (revised criteria), reflex testing should be performed using an alternative assay (IHC or ISH). Repeat testing should be considered if results seem discordant with other histopathologic findings. Laboratories should demonstrate high concordance with a validated HER2 test on a sufficiently large and representative set of specimens. Testing must be performed in a laboratory accredited by CAP or another accrediting entity. The Update Committee urges providers and health systems to cooperate to ensure the highest quality testing.