ON and OFF receptive field processing in the presence of optical scattering

Peripheral Contrast Reduction Optically Induced by Scattering Lenses Thickens Peripheral Choroid

Purpose

The mechanisms underlying a myopia control strategy using scattering lenses are unclear. Therefore, this study investigates the short-term effects of scatter lenses on central and peripheral choroidal thickness and axial length, which serve as a biomarker in myopia progression research.

Methods

In total, 23 participants underwent a 60-minute lens wear phase each to five lens conditions: medium peripheral scattering, high peripheral scattering, medium full-field scattering, high full-field scattering and control (clear lens). Central and peripheral choroidal thickness, foveal axial length, and central visual acuity were measured before and after each lens wear condition.

Results

Peripheral choroidal thickening was found after the lens wear phase of the medium peripheral scattering condition (+3.91 ± 5.37 µm, P = 0.04), revealing a significant difference to the control lens condition (P = 0.004), most pronounced in the superior peripheral retina (+1.95 ± 10.74 µm, P = 0.02). In the central retina, significant choroidal thickening was only found in the nasal part after exposure to medium full-field scattering (+3.91 ± 11.72 µm) compared to the control condition (P = 0.001). High peripheral and full-field scattering conditions did not significantly affect central or peripheral choroidal thickness. Visual acuity was significantly reduced in the full-field scattering conditions compared to control and peripheral scattering lenses, with no improvement after 60-minute lens wear. Axial length did not differ significantly after 60-minute exposure to any scattering lens condition or when compared to the control lens.

Conclusions

The results indicate a local retinal contrast detection mechanism signals the choroid to thicken peripherally after adaptation to medium peripheral scattering but not high peripheral scattering or full-field scattering at all, while central thickening was only significant nasally after exposure to medium full-field scattering. This emphasizes the importance of the peripheral retina and the level of contrast reduction in the context of myopia research.

Translational Relevance

This finding gives insight into the mechanism behind the myopia control strategy inducing peripheral scattering.

Foveal neural adaptation to optically induced contrast reduction

Contrast processing is suggested to interact with eye growth and myopia development. A novel contrast-reducing myopia control lens design decreases image contrast and was shown to slow myopia progression. Limited insights exist regarding neural visual processing following adaptation to image contrast reduction. This study investigated foveal neural contrast sensitivity in 29 young adults following a 30-minute adaptation to scattering using a Bangerter occlusion foil 0.8, +0.5-diopter defocus, and a clear lens control condition. Neural contrast sensitivity at its peak sensitivity of 6 cycles per degree was assessed before and after adaptation to the lens conditions, employing a unique interferometric system. Pre-adaptation measurements were averaged from six replicates and post-adaptation measurements by the first and last three of six replicates. The change in neural contrast sensitivity was largest for scattering across the first and last three post-adaptation measurements (+0.05 ± 0.01 logCS and +0.04 ± 0.01 logCS, respectively) compared with control and defocus (all +0.03 ± 0.01 logCS). For scattering, the observed increase of neural contrast sensitivity within the first three measurements differed significantly from the pre-adaptation baseline (p = 0.04) and was significantly higher compared with the control condition (p = 0.04). The sensitivity increases in the control and defocus conditions were not significant (all p > 0.05). As the adaptation effect diminished, no significant differences were found from baseline or between the conditions in the last three measurements (all p > 0.05). When post-adaptation neural contrast sensitivities were clustered into 25-second sequences, a significant effect was observed between the conditions, with only a significant relevant effect between control and scattering at 25 seconds (p = 0.04) and no further significant effects (all p > 0.05). The alteration in neural contrast sensitivity at peak sensitivity was most pronounced following adaptation to the scattering condition compared with defocus and control, suggesting that induced scattering might be considered for myopia control.

Mechanisms of emmetropization and what might go wrong in myopia

Studies in animal models and humans have shown that refractive state is optimized during postnatal development by a closed-loop negative feedback system that uses retinal image defocus as an error signal, a mechanism called emmetropization. The sensor to detect defocus and its sign resides in the retina itself. The retina and/or the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) presumably releases biochemical messengers to change choroidal thickness and modulate the growth rates of the underlying sclera. A central question arises: if emmetropization operates as a closed-loop system, why does it not stop myopia development? Recent experiments in young human subjects have shown that (1) the emmetropic retina can perfectly distinguish between real positive defocus and simulated defocus, and trigger transient axial eye shortening or elongation, respectively. (2) Strikingly, the myopic retina has reduced ability to inhibit eye growth when positive defocus is imposed. (3) The bi-directional response of the emmetropic retina is elicited with low spatial frequency information below 8 cyc/deg, which makes it unlikely that optical higher-order aberrations play a role. (4) The retinal mechanism for the detection of the sign of defocus involves a comparison of defocus blur in the blue (S-cone) and red end of the spectrum (L + M-cones) but, again, the myopic retina is not responsive, at least not in short-term experiments. This suggests that it cannot fully trigger the inhibitory arm of the emmetropization feedback loop. As a result, with an open feedback loop, myopia development becomes "open-loop".

Clarification on the understanding of contrast theory in relation to the article "ON and OFF receptive field processing in the presence of optical scattering": comment

We are writing to address errors of misrepresentation in the article "ON and OFF receptive field processing in the presence of optical scattering" [Biomed. Opt. Express14, 2618 (2023)10.1364/BOE.489117]. In their investigation of predictions of "contrast theory" to explain the efficacy of diffusion optics technology (DOT), a myopia control lens design [Br. J. Ophthalmol.107, 1709 (2023)10.1136/bjo-2021-321005], Breher et al. incorrectly indicated that our contrast theory proposed that the association between cone opsin gene splicing defects and myopia was due to differential involvement in ON- and OFF-visual pathways. In addition, the Authors write that we have "hypothesized enhanced ON contrast sensitivity in myopes," but we predict the opposite.

Contrast Sensitivity of ON and OFF Human Retinal Pathways in Myopia

The human visual cortex processes light and dark stimuli with ON and OFF pathways that are differently modulated by luminance contrast. We have previously demonstrated that ON cortical pathways have higher contrast sensitivity than OFF cortical pathways and the difference increases with luminance range (defined as the maximum minus minimum luminance in the scene). Here, we demonstrate that these ON-OFF cortical differences are already present in the human retina and that retinal responses measured with electroretinography are more affected by reductions in luminance range than cortical responses measured with electroencephalography. Moreover, we show that ON-OFF pathway differences measured with electroretinography become more pronounced in myopia, a visual disorder that elongates the eye and blurs vision at far distance. We find that, as the eye axial length increases across subjects, ON retinal pathways become less responsive, slower in response latency, less sensitive, and less effective and slower at driving pupil constriction. Based on these results, we conclude that myopia is associated with a deficit in ON pathway function that decreases the ability of the retina to process low contrast and regulate retinal illuminance in bright environments.

Introduction to Visual and Physiological Optics feature issue of Biomedical Optics Express and JOSA A

This feature issue collects articles presented at the tenth Visual and Physiological Optics meeting (VPO2022), held August 29-31, 2022, in Cambridge, UK. This joint feature issue between Biomedical Optics Express and Journal of the Optical Society of America A includes articles that cover the broad range of topics addressed at the meeting and examples of the current state of research in the field.

Visual and Physiological Optics: introduction to the joint feature issue in Biomedical Optics Express and Journal of the Optical Society of America A

This feature issue collects articles presented at the tenth Visual and Physiological Optics meeting (VPO2022), held August 29-31, 2022, in Cambridge, UK. This joint feature issue between Biomedical Optics Express and Journal of the Optical Society of America A includes articles that cover the broad range of topics addressed at the meeting and examples of the current state of research in the field.