Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib in Patients with Polymyalgia Rheumatica (EAST PMR): An open-label randomized controlled trial

Investigational agents for polymyalgia rheumatica treatment: assessing the critical needs for future development

INTRODUCTION

Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is an inflammatory rheumatic disorder characterized by pain and stiffness in the shoulder and pelvic girdles, constitutional symptoms, and elevated acute-phase reactants. Glucocorticoids (GCs) remain the first-choice treatment for PMR, but relapses are common. Identification of steroid-sparing agents is therefore of utmost importance.

AREAS COVERED

The efficacy of conventional immunosuppressive drugs is controversial. The use of interleukin (IL)-6 receptor inhibitors proved to be effective and safe in treating PMR patients. Currently, there are 12 ongoing clinical trials exploring potential treatments such as leflunomide, low-dose IL-2, rituximab, abatacept, secukinumab, Janus kinase inhibitors, and selective inhibitors like SPI-62 and ABBV 154.

EXPERT OPINION

The high efficacy of IL-6 R receptor inhibitors as well as the numerous drug trials currently recruiting suggest that several therapeutic options will be available in the near future. Accurate diagnosis and early stratification of PMR patients according to the giant cell arteritis-PMR Spectrum Disease 'GPSD' and potential risk factors for relapsing disease or GC-related adverse events are crucial to identify patients who would benefit most from GC-sparing agents. The development of internationally accepted definitions for remission and relapse is urgently needed. Early referral strategies to specialist settings would improve disease stratification and personalized treatment.

The pipeline of immunomodulatory therapies in polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis: A systematic review of clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this systematic review was to provide an overview of current developments and potentially available therapeutic options for polymyalgia rheumatic (PMR) and giant cell arteritis (GCA), in the coming years.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of 17 national and international clinical trial databases for all disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for PMR and GCA that are already marketed, in clinical development or withdrawn. The search was performed on January 2024, with the keywords "polymyalgia rheumatica" and "giant cell arteritis". For each molecule, we only considered the study at the most advanced stage of clinical development.

RESULTS

For PMR, a total of 15 DMARDs were identified: 2 conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs), 11 biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) and 2 targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs). For GCA, 18 DMARDs were identified: 2 csDMARDs, 14 bDMARDs and 2 tsDMARDs. Currently, there are only 2 approved corticosteroid-sparing therapies in these diseases, which both target the IL-6 signaling pathway, namely tocilizumab in GCA and sarilumab in PMR. Most of the molecules in current development are repurposed from from other conditions and clinical research in PMR/GCA seems to be mostly driven by the potential to repurpose existing treatments rather than by translational research.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review identified 23 DMARDs evaluated for PMR and GCA: 3 csDMARDs, 17 bDMARDs and 3 tsDMARDs. Several promising treatments are likely to be marketed in the coming years.

Recommendations of the French Society of Rheumatology for the management in current practice of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica

OBJECTIVE

To develop recommendations for the routine management of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR).

METHODS

Following standard procedures, a systematic review of the literature by five supervised junior rheumatologists, based on the questions selected by the steering committee (5 senior rheumatologists), was used as the basis for working meetings, followed by a one-day plenary meeting with the working group (15 members), leading to the development of the wording and determination of the strength of the recommendations and the level of agreement of the experts.

RESULTS

Five general principles and 19 recommendations were drawn up. Three recommendations relate to diagnosis and the use of imaging, and five to the assessment of the disease, its activity and comorbidities. Non-pharmacological therapies are the subject of one recommendation. Three recommendations concern initial treatment based on general corticosteroid therapy, five concern the reduction of corticosteroid therapy and follow-up, and two concern corticosteroid dependence and steroid-sparing treatments (anti-IL-6).

CONCLUSION

These recommendations take account of current data on PMR, with the aim of reducing exposure to corticosteroid therapy and its side effects in a fragile population. They are intended to be practical, to help practitioners in the day-to-day management of patients with PMR.

Abatacept in early polymyalgia rheumatica (ALORS): a proof-of-concept, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial

BACKGROUND

Medium-dose glucocorticoids can improve symptoms in nearly all patients with polymyalgia rheumatica. According to its good safety profile, abatacept could be used instead of glucocorticoids in early polymyalgia rheumatica. We aimed to determine whether the efficacy of abatacept is sufficient to justify larger studies in early polymyalgia rheumatica.

METHODS

To evaluate whether abatacept allows low disease activity without glucocorticoids in early polymyalgia rheumatica, we conducted a proof-of-concept, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. Participants were recruited from five centres in France (in Brest, Le Mans, Morlaix, Dinan and Saint Malo, and Strasbourg) and were included if they had recent-onset (<6 months) polymyalgia rheumatica with a C-reactive protein (CRP) polymyalgia rheumatica activity score (PMR-AS) of more than 17 without any signs or symptoms of giant cell arteritis (clinical and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT evaluation). Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive weekly subcutaneous abatacept (125 mg) or matching placebo, with glucocorticoid rescue therapy allowed in cases of high disease activity, for 12 weeks, and then glucocorticoid treatment based on disease activity, until week 36. Investigators, patients, outcome assessors, and sponsor personnel were masked to group assignments. The primary endpoint was low disease activity (CRP PMR-AS ≤10) at week 12 without glucocorticoids and without rescue treatment. The study was powered to demonstrate a 60% difference in response rates between groups. Open-ended adverse events were collected at each visit by clinicians and were categorised following system organ class classification after study completion. The ALORS trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03632187.

FINDINGS

34 patients (22 women and 12 men) were randomly assigned between Dec 13, 2018, and Oct 21, 2021. All patients who had been randomly assigned were included in the analysis. The primary endpoint was reached by eight (50%) of 16 patients in the abatacept group and four (22%) of 18 patients in the placebo group (relative risk 2·2 [0·9-5·5]); crude p=0·15; adjusted p=0·070). Eight (50%) patients in the abatacept and 15 (83%) in the placebo group had adverse events. Four patients (one [6%] in the abatacept group and three [17%] in the placebo group) had serious adverse events. There were no deaths or new safety concerns.

INTERPRETATION

This study suggests that the effect of abatacept alone is not strong enough to justify larger studies in early polymyalgia rheumatica. This is only a first step in deciding whether a larger study should be conducted in early polymyalgia rheumatica and does not exclude a potential effect of abatacept in glucocorticoid-dependent polymyalgia rheumatica.

FUNDING

BMS Pharma France.

Biological therapy in polymyalgia rheumatica

INTRODUCTION

Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is an inflammatory rheumatic disease of the elderly, treated mainly with systemic corticosteroids. The frequency of side effects of steroids is high in this aged population and increased due to comorbidities. The use of biological treatments could be of interest in this condition.

AREAS COVERED

This review takes into account literature data from the PubMed and clinical trial databases concerning the results of the use of biological treatments in PMR, in terms of efficacy and safety of these treatments.

EXPERT OPINION

Current data do not allow us to identify any particular efficacy of the various anti-TNF agents used in the treatment of PMR. Anti-interleukin 6 agents (tocilizumab, sarilumab) have shown consistent efficacy results, suggesting a particularly interesting steroid-sparing effect in the population under consideration. The safety profile appears acceptable. Other biologic targeted treatments are currently being evaluated. Anti-interleukin-6 agents may well have a place in the therapeutic strategy for PMR, particularly for patients with steroid-resistant disease or at high risk of complications of corticosteroid therapy.