1
|
Haroun E, Agrawal K, Leibovitch J, Kassab J, Zoghbi M, Dutta D, Lim SH. Chronic graft-versus-host disease in pediatric patients: Differences and challenges. Blood Rev 2023; 60:101054. [PMID: 36805299 DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2023.101054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
Despite the use of high-resolution molecular techniques for tissue typing, chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) remains a major complication following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. cGVHD adversely affects the life-expectancy and quality of life. The latter is particularly important and functionally relevant in pediatric patients who have a longer life-expectancy than adults. Current laboratory evidence suggests that there is not any difference in the pathophysiology of cGVHD between adults and pediatric patients. However, there are some clinical features and complications of the disease that are different in pediatric patients. There are also challenges in the development of new therapeutics for this group of patients. In this review, we will discuss the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical features and consequences of the disease, and highlight the differences between pediatric and adult patients. We will examine the current treatment options for pediatric patients with moderate to severe cGVHD and discuss the challenges facing therapeutic development for cGVHD in the pediatric population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elio Haroun
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States of America
| | - Kavita Agrawal
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States of America
| | - Jennifer Leibovitch
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States of America
| | - Joseph Kassab
- Department of Medicine, Saint-Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Marianne Zoghbi
- Department of Medicine, Saint-Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Dibyendu Dutta
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States of America
| | - Seah H Lim
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States of America,; Sanofi Oncology, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Polfuss M, Mooney-Doyle K, Keller M, Gralton KS, Giambra B, Vance A. Developing a Family Resource: Considerations for Family Member Research Participation. JOURNAL OF FAMILY NURSING 2023; 29:202-222. [PMID: 36935575 DOI: 10.1177/10748407231157433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
When individuals participate in health care research, the choice often affects the entire family. Researchers are responsible for protecting participants and minimizing any burdens the research may place on them. Resources to educate potential study participants about these issues from a family perspective are lacking. A family-focused, evidence-based resource was created for individuals and families to prompt discussion prior to their consenting to enrollment in research. The resource includes key relevant questions to consider related to their study participation and was revised based on input from family nurse scientists and a hospital-based family advisory group. This resource raises awareness of the importance of employing a family lens when designing research and during the recruitment and enrollment of participants. Adopting a family lens in health care research will support the participant's ability to make an informed choice regarding participation and may ultimately enhance the experience of participants and their families and study outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Polfuss
- University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA
- Children's Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | | | | | | | - Barbara Giambra
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Ashlee Vance
- Michigan State University, Detroit, USA
- Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mohini P, Palaganas M, Elia Y, Motran L, Sochett E, Curtis J, Scholey JW, McArthur L, Mahmud FH. Exploring the Motivational Drivers of Young Adults with Diabetes for Participation in Kidney Research. J Patient Exp 2022; 9:23743735221138236. [PMID: 36388087 PMCID: PMC9663656 DOI: 10.1177/23743735221138236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Understanding motivational drivers and barriers to patient participation in diabetes research are important to ensure research is relevant and valuable. Young adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) completed a 31-question qualitative survey evaluating participant experience, understanding, and motivators and barriers to research involvement. A total of 35 participants, 19–28 years of age, 60% female, completed the survey. Motivating factors included personal benefit, relationship with the study team, curiosity, financial compensation, altruism, and nostalgia. Older participants (>22 years) reported higher levels of trust in the study team (p = 0.02) and their relationship with the study team positively influenced their decision to participate (p = 0.03). Financial compensation was a strong motivator for participants with higher education (p = 0.02). Age, sex, education level, and trust in the study team influenced participants’ understanding. Barriers included logistics and lack of familial support. Important motivational drivers and barriers to participation in research by young adults with T1D must be considered to increase research engagement and facilitate the discovery of new knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Mohini
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - M Palaganas
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Y Elia
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - L Motran
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - E Sochett
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - J Curtis
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - JW Scholey
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - L McArthur
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - FH Mahmud
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schunk JE, Jacobsen KK, Stephens D, Watson A, Olsen CS, Casper TC, Glaser NS, Kuppermann N. Enroller Experience and Parental Familiarity of Disease Influence Participation in a Pediatric Trial. West J Emerg Med 2021; 22:1176-1182. [PMID: 34546895 PMCID: PMC8463059 DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2021.4.54647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Acquiring parental consent is critical to pediatric clinical research, especially in interventional trials. In this study we investigated demographic, clinical, and environmental factors associated with likelihood of parental permission for enrollment in a study of therapies for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in children. Methods We analyzed data from patients and parents who were approached for enrollment in the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) Fluid Therapies Under Investigation in DKA (FLUID) trial at one major participating center. We determined the influence of various factors on patient enrollment, including gender, age, distance from home to hospital, insurance status, known vs new onset of diabetes, glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c), DKA severity, gender of the enroller, experience of the enroller, and time of enrollment. Patients whose parents consented to participate were compared to those who declined participation using bivariable and multivariable analyses controlling for the enroller. Results A total of 250 patient/parent dyads were approached; 177 (71%) agreed to participate, and 73 (29%) declined. Parents of patients with previous episodes of DKA agreed to enroll more frequently than those with a first DKA episode (94.3% for patients with 1–2 previous DKA episodes, 92.3% for > 2 previous episodes, vs 64.9% for new onset diabetes and 63.2% previously diagnosed but no previous DKA). Participation was also more likely with more experienced enrollers (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] of participation for an enroller with more than two years’ experience vs less than two years: 2.46 [1.53, 3.97]). After adjusting for demographic and clinical factors, significant associations between participation and both DKA history and enroller experience remained. Patient age, gender, distance of home from hospital, glycemic control, insurance status, and measures of DKA severity were not associated with likelihood of participation. Conclusion Familiarity with the disease process (previously diagnosed diabetes and previous experience with DKA) and experience of the enroller favorably influenced the likelihood of parental permission for enrollment in a study of DKA in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeff E Schunk
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Kammy K Jacobsen
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Dilon Stephens
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Amy Watson
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Cody S Olsen
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - T Charles Casper
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Nicole S Glaser
- University of California Davis Health, Department of Pediatrics, Sacramento, California
| | - Nathan Kuppermann
- University of California Davis Health, Department of Pediatrics, Sacramento, California.,University of California Davis Health, Department of Emergency Medicine, Sacramento, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nielson C, Huang Y, Kull CA, Park AH. Utilizing Community Engagement Studios to inform patient experience in a multicenter randomized control trial. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 133:110007. [PMID: 32208178 PMCID: PMC7225038 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2019] [Revised: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether a community engagement approach can provide feedback for implementation of valuable measures to improve the outcome of a clinical trial. METHODS Review of the results from a Community Engagement Studio (CE Studio) for the ValEAR trial: an NIH-funded, multi-institutional study designed to research the efficacy of valganciclovir in the treatment of congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV)-induced hearing loss. Participants were given information about the trial then asked a series of questions to assess their input on the merits or weaknesses affecting their participation in the trial. RESULTS Thirteen parents whose children have congenital CMV infection were recruited for the CE Studio. The overall theme from the responses was a desire to advance the field but a need to clearly understand the risks and benefits of participation. Many requested more educational resources, more printed materials, or greater access to researchers if questions arose. Many welcomed having patient stories and information displayed in a dedicated website or through social media. CONCLUSION This community engagement approach provided useful feedback from families similar to those expected to be potential enrollees in the CMV ValEAR trial. In response to parental comments, two educational videos were created: one on the general topic of cCMV and the other specific to the CMV ValEAR trial. Researchers who wish to optimize their clinical trial's success should consider incorporating a CE Studio into their study design.
Collapse
|
6
|
Parent Perceptions of and Preferences for Participation in Child Health Research: Results from a Pediatric Practice-Based Research Network. J Am Board Fam Med 2019; 32:685-694. [PMID: 31506364 PMCID: PMC7890794 DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.05.190030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2019] [Revised: 05/07/2019] [Accepted: 05/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recruitment efforts for child health research are often based on assumptions, therefore improving knowledge about parents' perceptions and preferences could enhance engagement. AIM/OBJECTIVE 1) To describe parents' perceptions about and preferences for participation in child health research within a pediatric practice-based research network (PBRN), and 2) to investigate any associations with the presence of on-site PBRN research staff, office location, and child age. METHODS We conducted a 2-phase study with a convenience sample of parents from diverse office settings. Phase 1 was a qualitative assessment using semistructured, in-person interviews. Phase 2 consisted of a quantitative self-administered survey assessing: 1) perceptions of importance, benefits/motivations, and risks/barriers of child health research, and 2) preferences for recruitment method and enrollment location. RESULTS Parents (n = 627) uniformly perceived child health research to be important in prevention (89%), diagnosis (89%), and treatment (92%). They were motivated to participate most commonly by altruism and rarely by compensation. Parents perceived side effects (60%), discomfort (52%), and time (45%) as the main risks of participation. Most parents preferred to learn about research opportunities at their pediatric office (70%), and if interested, to enroll their child in their pediatric office (57%) or in their home (52%). Parents were significantly more altruistic and interested in participation in offices with on-site PBRN research staff and greater proximity to the University. CONCLUSIONS Child health researchers could enhance participation by using recruitment resources and enrollment strategies that match parent preferences, including engagement by on-site PBRN staff.
Collapse
|
7
|
Kick K, Assfalg R, Aydin S, Bechtold-Dalla Pozza S, Böcker D, Braig S, Bunk M, Dunstheimer D, Durmashkina A, Ermer U, Gavazzeni A, Gerstl EM, Heinrich M, Herbst M, Kriesen Y, Kuhnle-Krahl U, Müller H, Nellen-Hellmuth N, Ockert C, Ramminger C, Sindichakis M, Tretter S, Warncke K, Achenbach P, Ziegler AG, Hoffmann VS. Recruiting young pre-symptomatic children for a clinical trial in type 1 diabetes: Insights from the Fr1da insulin intervention study. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2018; 11:170-173. [PMID: 30197933 PMCID: PMC6126533 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Revised: 08/01/2018] [Accepted: 08/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although detection of children at high risk of developing type 1 diabetes and diagnosis of early stages is possible, up to now there exists no approved therapy to delay or prevent type 1 diabetes. Thus it is vital to develop evidence-based interventions. For this a sufficient number of trial participants is crucial but difficult to obtain especially in asymptomatic children. Aim Identifying family characteristics that lead to or impede trial participation and analyze reasons stated by families for non-participation. Methods Participants for the Fr1da Insulin Intervention study are recruited from the Fr1da study, a population based screening for early stage type 1 diabetes in Bavaria. Families with eligible children were invited to enroll. We analyzed sex and age of the child, distance of the family to the study center in Munich and the existence of a first degree family member with type 1 as possible influential factors for study participation. We also analyzed reasons stated by families who declined study participation in a phone interview. Results Of 146 eligible children 77 (53%) were enrolled into the trial. None of the tested family characteristics differed significantly between the enrolling and the families not participating, but in general enrolling families lived closer to the study site than families not participating. This is also reflected in the reasons given by non-participating families. The most frequent reason stated were time restrictions. The second most frequent reason was the venous blood draw. Conclusion The factors for non-participation identified in this project need be taken into account for the design of future trials in young children to ensure proper recruitment and thus to generate valid results for medical treatment of children. More research on the reason of participation and non-participation in clinical trials is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerstin Kick
- Forschergruppe Diabetes, Technical University Munich, at Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Robin Assfalg
- Institute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich-Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Susanne Aydin
- Forschergruppe Diabetes, Technical University Munich, at Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Melanie Bunk
- Forschergruppe Diabetes e.V. at Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich-Neuherberg, Germany
| | | | - Alevtina Durmashkina
- Forschergruppe Diabetes, Technical University Munich, at Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Uwe Ermer
- Kliniken St. Elisabeth, Neuburg/Donau, Germany
| | | | | | - Melanie Heinrich
- Forschergruppe Diabetes, Technical University Munich, at Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Melanie Herbst
- Forschergruppe Diabetes e.V. at Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich-Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Yvonne Kriesen
- Forschergruppe Diabetes e.V. at Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich-Neuherberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Claudia Ramminger
- Forschergruppe Diabetes e.V. at Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich-Neuherberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Katharina Warncke
- Forschergruppe Diabetes e.V. at Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich-Neuherberg, Germany
- Department of Pediatrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Achenbach
- Forschergruppe Diabetes, Technical University Munich, at Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich-Neuherberg, Germany
- Forschergruppe Diabetes e.V. at Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich-Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Anette-G. Ziegler
- Forschergruppe Diabetes, Technical University Munich, at Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich-Neuherberg, Germany
- Forschergruppe Diabetes e.V. at Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich-Neuherberg, Germany
- Corresponding author. Institute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764 Neuherberg , Germany.
| | - Verena S. Hoffmann
- Institute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich-Neuherberg, Germany
- Corresponding author. Institute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764 Neuherberg , Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Laibhen-Parkes N, Kimble LP, Melnyk BM, Sudia T, Codone S. An Adaptation of the Original Fresno Test to Measure Evidence-Based Practice Competence in Pediatric Bedside Nurses. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2018; 15:230-240. [PMID: 29729660 DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Instruments used to assess evidence-based practice (EBP) competence in nurses have been subjective, unreliable, or invalid. The Fresno test was identified as the only instrument to measure all the steps of EBP with supportive reliability and validity data. However, the items and psychometric properties of the original Fresno test are only relevant to measure EBP with medical residents. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to describe the development of the adapted Fresno test for pediatric nurses, and provide preliminary validity and reliability data for its use with Bachelor of Science in Nursing-prepared pediatric bedside nurses. METHODS General adaptations were made to the original instrument's case studies, item content, wording, and format to meet the needs of a pediatric nursing sample. The scoring rubric was also modified to complement changes made to the instrument. Content and face validity, and intrarater reliability of the adapted Fresno test were assessed during a mixed-methods pilot study conducted from October to December 2013 with 29 Bachelor of Science in Nursing-prepared pediatric nurses. RESULTS Validity data provided evidence for good content and face validity. Intrarater reliability estimates were high. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION The adapted Fresno test presented here appears to be a valid and reliable assessment of EBP competence in Bachelor of Science in Nursing-prepared pediatric nurses. However, further testing of this instrument is warranted using a larger sample of pediatric nurses in diverse settings. This instrument can be a starting point for evaluating the impact of EBP competence on patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Laibhen-Parkes
- Clinical Assistant Professor, Georgia Baptist College of Nursing, Mercer University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Laura P Kimble
- Professor and Piedmont Healthcare Endowed Chair in Nursing, Georgia Baptist College of Nursing, Mercer University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk
- Associate Vice President for Health Promotion, University Chief Wellness Officer, Dean and Professor, College of Nursing, and Professor of Pediatrics & Psychiatry, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA, and Editor, Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, Sigma, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Tanya Sudia
- Associate Dean for Research and Scholarship, Interim Graduate Program Director and Professor, Louise Herrington School of Nursing, Baylor University, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Susan Codone
- Associate Professor, Technical Communication, Mercer University, Macon, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kamin W, Funk P, Seifert G, Zimmermann A, Lehmacher W. EPs 7630 is effective and safe in children under 6 years with acute respiratory tract infections: clinical studies revisited. Curr Med Res Opin 2018; 34:475-485. [PMID: 29119837 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1402754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pelargonium sidoides preparation EPs 7630 has been proven safe and effective in acute respiratory tract infections (aRTIs), but data for young children have not been presented separately. This study reviewed clinical studies and presents an overview of known and newly analyzed data from children <6 years. METHODS MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for interventional and non-interventional studies which investigated the effects of EPs 7630 in aRTIs and included children <6 years of age. Sub-group analyses for this age range were performed for symptom scales, global efficacy or effectiveness assessments, and safety outcomes. RESULTS Seven studies with 1067 children <6 years exposed to EPs 7630 were identified. Efficacy of EPs 7630 was significantly superior to placebo in reducing symptom intensity and time until complete recovery in two randomized, double-blind trials in patients with acute bronchitis (AB). Similar symptom time courses were observed in two non-comparative observational studies in AB. One non-comparative, open-label study was identified in acute tonsillopharyngitis (ATP), and one in acute rhinosinusitis (ARS). In both indications, nearly all children showed complete recovery or major symptom improvements during the treatment period, with changes that were similar to those observed in controlled trials investigating older patient populations. The results were supported by an additional observational study including children with various diagnoses of aRTIs. EPs 7630 was safe and well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS EPs 7630 is efficacious in children <6 years suffering from AB. The analyses also support the effectiveness of the product in ATP and in ARS. No safety concerns were identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Kamin
- a Clinic for Paediatrics , Evangelic Hospital Hamm , Hamm , Germany
| | - Petra Funk
- b Clinical Research Department , Dr. Willmar Schwabe GmbH & Co. KG , Karlsruhe , Germany
| | - Georg Seifert
- c Clinic for Paediatrics , Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin , Berlin , Germany
| | - Andrea Zimmermann
- b Clinical Research Department , Dr. Willmar Schwabe GmbH & Co. KG , Karlsruhe , Germany
| | - Walter Lehmacher
- d Institute for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology of the University of Cologne , Cologne , Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Peay HL, Biesecker BB, Wilfond BS, Jarecki J, Umstead KL, Escolar DM, Tibben A. Barriers and facilitators to clinical trial participation among parents of children with pediatric neuromuscular disorders. Clin Trials 2018; 15:139-148. [PMID: 29475375 DOI: 10.1177/1740774517751118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Pediatric rare disease presents a challenging situation of high unmet need and a limited pool of potential clinical trial participants. Understanding perspectives of parents of children who have not participated in trials may facilitate approaches to optimize participation rates. The objective of this study was to explore factors associated with parental interest in enrolling children with pediatric neuromuscular disorders in clinical trials. METHODS Parents of individuals with Duchenne or Becker muscular dystrophy and spinal muscular atrophy were recruited through advocacy organizations, a registry, and clinics. These parents ( N = 203) completed a questionnaire including assessments of barriers and facilitators to clinical trial participation, parents' interest in trial participation, and their perceptions of others' views about participation in a clinical trial. RESULTS Trial interest in participating parents was high (64% combined group). The most highly endorsed barrier to participation was the possibility of receiving placebo, followed by not having enough information on risks and trial procedures. Compared to parents of children with Duchenne or Becker muscular dystrophy, parents of children with spinal muscular atrophy endorsed significantly more information and knowledge barriers. The greatest facilitators of participation were (1) confidence in improving disease understanding and (2) guarantee to receive the treatment after a successful trial. A logistic regression model, χ2 (4, n = 188) = 80.64, p < .001, indicated that higher perceived barriers and more frequent trial communication by the provider were associated with lower interest, while positive trial perceptions by the child's providers and concordance in trial perceptions among those close to the decision-maker were associated with higher interest. CONCLUSION We found high parental interest in pediatric neuromuscular trials that was tempered by concerns about the potential for randomization to a placebo arm. Participants perceived that their trial participation would be facilitated by additional education and guidance from their clinicians. Yet, intentions were negatively associated with frequency of provider communication, perhaps reflecting waning parental interest with a greater understanding of limitations in trial access, increased sophistication in their understanding of trial design, and appreciation of potential burden. To support parents' informed decisions, it is important to educate them to evaluate the quality of research, as well as providing lay information explaining the use of placebo, trial processes, and potential barriers to long-term drug access. Our findings should inform the development of targeted educational content, clinician training, and decision support tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly L Peay
- 1 RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.,2 Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy, Hackensack, NJ, USA
| | - Barbara B Biesecker
- 3 Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Kendall L Umstead
- 3 Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Aad Tibben
- 7 Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Parents' perceived obstacles to pediatric clinical trial participation: Findings from the clinical trials transformation initiative. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2017; 9:33-39. [PMID: 29696222 PMCID: PMC5898566 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2017.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2017] [Revised: 11/08/2017] [Accepted: 11/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Enrollment of children into pediatric clinical trials remains challenging. More effective strategies to improve recruitment of children into trials are needed. This study used in-depth qualitative interviews with parents who were approached to enroll their children in a clinical trial in order to gain an understanding of the barriers to pediatric clinical trial participation. Twenty-four parents whose children had been offered the opportunity to participate in a clinical trial were interviewed: 19 whose children had participated in at least 1 clinical trial and 5 who had declined participation in any trial. Each study aspect, from the initial explanation of the study to the end of the study, can affect the willingness of parents to consent to the proposed study and future studies. Establishing trust, appropriate timing, a transparent discussion of risks and benefits oriented to the layperson, and providing motivation for children to participate were key factors that impacted parents' decisions. In order for clinical trial accrual to be successful, parents' priorities and considerations must be a central focus, beginning with initial trial design. The recommendations from the parents who participated in this study can be used to support budget allocations that ensure adequate training of study staff and improved staffing on nights and weekends. Studies of parent responses in outpatient settings and additional inpatient settings will provide valuable information on the consent process from the child's and parent's perspectives. Further studies are needed to explore whether implementation of such strategies will result in improved recruitment for pediatric clinical trials.
Collapse
|
12
|
Research Participation Decision-Making Among Youth and Parents of Youth With Chronic Health Conditions. J Pediatr Health Care 2017; 31:167-177. [PMID: 27553117 DOI: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2016.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2016] [Revised: 07/05/2016] [Accepted: 07/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
The aims of this qualitative descriptive study were to describe how past experiences with research (including communication, information, values, and support) may contribute to research fatigue among youth and parents of youth with HIV, cystic fibrosis, and Type 1 diabetes. Eighteen parents and youth were purposively recruited from outpatient subspecialty clinics at a major academic medical center. They took part in qualitative interviews and completed a demographics form and the Decisional Conflict Scale. Youth participants also completed the Erikson Psychosocial Stage Inventory. Two major themes emerged: Blurred Lines and Hope for the Future. Research fatigue was not found in this sample. Results point to challenges with informed consent in settings where research and clinical care are integrated and suggest that protective factors allow for continued participation without excess burden on youth and parents. Strategies to minimize research fatigue and support engagement in research are offered.
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose was to identify patient/family characteristics and recruitment process characteristics associated with the decision to participate in a 2-year continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) RCT for youth with type 1 diabetes and their families. METHOD Study staff approached patients who were conditionally eligible according to medical record review or referred by a provider. We categorized families according to participation decision (agree vs decline) and timing of decision (day of approach vs later ["thinkers"]). RESULTS Over 18 months, we approached 456 eligible patients; 19% agreed on the day of approach, 10% agreed later, 42% declined on the day of approach, and 30% declined later. Agreers were younger ( P = .002), had shorter diabetes duration ( P = .0003), had a lower insulin dose ( P = .02), checked blood glucose levels more often ( P = .002), and were more likely to use pump therapy ( P = .009) than decliners. Patients/families were more likely to agree in fall/winter (41%) than spring/summer (19%, P < .0001). Of decliners, 50% cited no interest in CGM as the reason for nonparticipation. Among thinkers, 49% of patients who made a decision within 2 weeks of being approached agreed; only 15% of thinkers who made a decision >2 weeks after being approached agreed to participate ( P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS Recruitment is a critical and often challenging phase of clinical trials. Recruitment to pediatric CGM studies may be especially challenging due to youths' reluctance to use CGM. These data provide an opportunity to better understand and possibly optimize recruitment into future pediatric CGM studies and other studies of advanced diabetes technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa K. Volkening
- Section on Clinical, Behavioral & Outcomes Research, Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult Section, Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kaitlin C. Gaffney
- Section on Clinical, Behavioral & Outcomes Research, Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult Section, Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michelle L. Katz
- Section on Clinical, Behavioral & Outcomes Research, Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult Section, Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lori M. Laffel
- Section on Clinical, Behavioral & Outcomes Research, Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult Section, Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kelly LE, Davies EH, Saint-Raymond A, Tomasi P, Offringa M. Important issues in the justification of a control treatment in paediatric drug trials. Arch Dis Child 2016; 101:962-7. [PMID: 27052950 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-310644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2016] [Accepted: 03/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The value of comparative effectiveness trials in informing clinical and policy decisions depends heavily on the choice of control arm (comparator). Our objective is to identify challenges in comparator reasoning and to determine justification criteria for selecting a control arm in paediatric clinical trials. DESIGN A literature search was completed to identify existing sources of guidance on comparator selection. Subsequently, we reviewed a randomly selected sample of comparators selected for paediatric investigation plans (PIPs) adopted by the Paediatric Committee of the European Medicines Agency in 2013. We gathered descriptive information and evaluated their review process to identify challenges and compromises between regulators and sponsors with regard to the selection of the comparator. A tool to help investigators justify the selection of active controls and placebo arms was developed using the existing literature and empirical data. RESULTS Justifying comparator selection was a challenge in 28% of PIPs. The following challenging paediatric issues in the decision-making process were identified: use of off-label medications as comparators, ethical and safe use of placebo, duration of placebo use, an undefined optimal dosing strategy, lack of age-appropriate safety and efficacy data, and drug dosing not supported by extrapolation of safety/efficacy evidence from other populations. CONCLUSIONS In order to generate trials that will inform clinical decision-making and support marketing authorisations, researchers must systemically and transparently justify their selection of the comparator arm for their study. This report highlights key areas for justification in the choice of comparator in paediatric clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren E Kelly
- Child Health and Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Martin Offringa
- Child Health and Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Stocks J, Lum S. Back to school: challenges and rewards of engaging young children in scientific research. Arch Dis Child 2016; 101:785-7. [PMID: 27117837 PMCID: PMC5013085 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-310347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2016] [Accepted: 04/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Janet Stocks
- Respiratory, Critical Care and Anaesthesia section (Portex Unit), UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Sooky Lum
- Respiratory, Critical Care and Anaesthesia section (Portex Unit), UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tromp K, Zwaan CM, van de Vathorst S. Motivations of children and their parents to participate in drug research: a systematic review. Eur J Pediatr 2016; 175:599-612. [PMID: 27041121 PMCID: PMC4839044 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-016-2715-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2015] [Revised: 03/08/2016] [Accepted: 03/13/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Information on motivations for research participation, may enable professionals to better tailor the process of recruitment and informed consent to the perspective of parents and children. Therefore, this systematic review assesses motivating and discouraging factors for children and their parents to decide to participate in clinical drug research. Studies were identified from searches in 6 databases. Two independent reviewers screened and selected relevant articles. Results were aggregated and presented by use of qualitative metasummary. 38 studies fulfilled the selection criteria and were of sufficient quality for inclusion in the qualitative metasummary. Most mentioned motivating factors for parents were: health benefit for child, altruism, trust in research, and relation to researcher. Most mentioned motivating factors for children were: personal health benefit, altruism and increasing comfort. Fear of risks, distrust in research, logistical aspects and disruption of daily life were mentioned most by parents as discouraging factors. Burden and disruption of daily life, feeling like a "guinea pig" and fear of risks were most mentioned as discouraging factors by children. CONCLUSION Paying attention to these motivating and discouraging factors of children and their parents during the recruitment and informed consent process in drug research increases the moral and instrumental value of informed consent. WHAT IS KNOWN • This systematic review pools the existing empirical literature on motivations of minors and their parents to consent or dissent to participation in clinical drug research. • The most mentioned motivating and discouraging factors for children and their parents to consent to participation in clinical drug research are identified aggregated and presented by use of qualitative metasummary. What is new: • This information can be used to adapt the research protocol, recruitment, and informed consent/assent process to the needs of children and their parents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krista Tromp
- />Department of Medical Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Erasmus MC, P.O. box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C. Michel Zwaan
- />Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children’s Hospital, P.O. box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne van de Vathorst
- />Department of Medical Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Erasmus MC, P.O. box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cunningham J, Wallston KA, Wilkins CH, Hull PC, Miller ST. Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the HPV Clinical Trial Survey for Parents (CTSP-HPV) Using Traditional Survey Development Methods and Community Engagement Principles. Clin Transl Sci 2015; 8:702-9. [PMID: 26530324 DOI: 10.1111/cts.12347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study describes the development and psychometric evaluation of HPV Clinical Trial Survey for Parents with Children Aged 9 to 15 (CTSP-HPV) using traditional instrument development methods and community engagement principles. METHODS An expert panel and parental input informed survey content and parents recommended study design changes (e.g., flyer wording). A convenience sample of 256 parents completed the final survey measuring parental willingness to consent to HPV clinical trial (CT) participation and other factors hypothesized to influence willingness (e.g., HPV vaccine benefits). Cronbach's a, Spearman correlations, and multiple linear regression were used to estimate internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity, and predictively validity, respectively. RESULTS Internal reliability was confirmed for all scales (a ≥ 0.70.). Parental willingness was positively associated (p < 0.05) with trust in medical researchers, adolescent CT knowledge, HPV vaccine benefits, advantages of adolescent CTs (r range 0.33-0.42), supporting convergent validity. Moderate discriminant construct validity was also demonstrated. Regression results indicate reasonable predictive validity with the six scales accounting for 31% of the variance in parents' willingness. CONCLUSIONS This instrument can inform interventions based on factors that influence parental willingness, which may lead to the eventual increase in trial participation. Further psychometric testing is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Consuelo H Wilkins
- School of Medicine, Meharry Medical College, School of Medicine, and Meharry-Vanderbilt Alliance, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Pamela C Hull
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Stephania T Miller
- Department of Surgery, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ayers S, Sawyer A, Düring C, Rabe H. Parents report positive experiences about enrolling babies in a cord-related clinical trial before birth. Acta Paediatr 2015; 104:e164-70. [PMID: 25639827 DOI: 10.1111/apa.12922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2014] [Revised: 08/06/2014] [Accepted: 01/07/2015] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study was to evaluate parents' perceptions when they were asked to enrol their unborn preterm infant in a randomised trial involving delayed cord clamping or cord milking. METHODS The parents of 58 infants were asked to take part in a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews to provide feedback about how they felt about their infants being included in the research project. A total of 37 parents - 15 fathers and 22 mothers - agreed to take part. RESULTS Parents were generally positive about their experiences of their baby taking part in the trial, but the findings raised some concerns about the validity of the consent obtained before delivery, as it was given in a hurry, and some participants had difficulty remembering that they had agreed to take part. Four themes were identified from the interviews: implications of taking part, reasons for enrolling infants, experiences of recruitment and suggestions for improvement. CONCLUSION Overall, the parents were positive about their baby taking part in the trial, but the consent process could be improved, by providing information about relevant trials earlier in the pregnancy or implementing continuous consent at key points in the trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Ayers
- Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research; City University London; London UK
| | - Alexandra Sawyer
- Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research; City University London; London UK
| | | | - Heike Rabe
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School and University Hospitals; Brighton UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Buck D, Hogan V, Powell CJ, Sloper JJ, Speed C, Taylor RH, Tiffin P, Clarke MP. Surrendering control, or nothing to lose: Parents' preferences about participation in a randomised trial of childhood strabismus surgery. Clin Trials 2015; 12:384-93. [PMID: 25805203 DOI: 10.1177/1740774515577956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intermittent exotropia is the most common form of divergent strabismus (squint) in children. Evidence regarding its optimum management is limited. A pilot randomised controlled trial has recently been completed (Surgery versus Active Monitoring in Intermittent Exotropia trial) to determine the feasibility of a full randomised controlled trial. PURPOSE To identify drivers for and barriers against parents' participation in Surgery versus Active Monitoring in Intermittent Exotropia and to seek their views on information received, the need for randomisation, and enhancing acceptability. METHODS Multiple method qualitative study using semi-structured telephone interviews to explore parents' motivations and trial screening logs to provide an indication of common barriers. Exploratory thematic analysis identified key themes. RESULTS A total of 48 interviews were conducted (14 participants; 34 non-participants). Barriers included no desire for surgery/preference to 'wait and see', wanting surgery immediately, feeling uncomfortable about 'surrendering control' over decision-making/being managed 'at random', lack of confidence in the effectiveness of surgery, believing the risks outweighed the benefits, and lack of trust. Drivers included desiring surgery, 'nothing to lose', benefits offsetting the risks, and being in a trial would result in better care. Some also mentioned 'doing their bit' for research. Suggestions for enhancing acceptability included allowing choice of treatment group, giving more time for decision-making, expanding on information given, and improving communication. Many felt the necessity of randomisation was adequately explained, but there was some indication that it was misunderstood. Information extracted from the screening logs of 80/89 eligible non-participants indicated the most prevalent barrier was not wanting surgery/preferring to observe (56%), followed by desiring surgery straightaway (15%). Opposition to randomisation/wanting to retain control was recorded in 9% of cases as was the belief that the child's squint was not severe enough to warrant surgery. LIMITATIONS Interviews were not audio-recorded. Not all who consented to interview could be contacted, although the response/contact rate was good (48/62). A few parents did not provide reasons for refusing the trial. CONCLUSION Opposition to surgery and concerns about surrendering control were common obstacles to participation, whereas parents keen for their child to undergo the operation but happy to defer tended to embrace a 'nothing to lose' attitude. Many non-participants would have consented if allowed to choose group, although most of these would have chosen observation. While most parents felt happy with information given and that randomisation was adequately explained, it is of concern that there may be some misunderstanding, which should be addressed in any trial. These findings will inform future trials in childhood exotropia, for example, consideration of preference arms and improving communication. Lessons learnt from the Surgery versus Active Monitoring in Intermittent Exotropia trial could prove valuable to paediatric and surgical trials generally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Buck
- Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Vanessa Hogan
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Christine J Powell
- Newcastle Eye Centre, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Chris Speed
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Geppert C, Candilis P, Baker S, Lidz C, Appelbaum P, Fletcher K. Motivations of Patients with Diabetes to Participate in Research. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2014; 5:14-21. [PMID: 25419533 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2014.910282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research on the motivations of research participants has focused primarily on vulnerable populations at risk of exploitation, and there is little research on the motivations and reasons of general medical patients participating in research. Given a significant increase in research studies recruiting participants with diabetes, we sought to better understand the motivations of patients with diabetes considering a general medical research protocol. METHODS The analyses presented here compare the reasoning and willingness to participate in a hypothetical research study of medically ill subjects (patients with diabetes, n=51) with non-ill (n=57) subjects. Responses on the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research (MacCAT-CR) were correlated with demographic variables and scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Short-Form-36 (SF-36). RESULTS Overall, 44% of the group with diabetes and 56% of the comparison group indicated a willingness to participate in the research study. The reasons diabetic and comparison groups offered for willingness or unwillingness to participate in research did not differ significantly. 75% mentioned reasons related to treatment, 63% altruism; none mentioned money. Of those patients with diabetes who would not participate in research, 94% cited risk, and 89% expressed an aversion to research. CONCLUSIONS The present study suggests that when research is not related to their diagnosis, persons with diabetes do not differ significantly from non-ill comparison subjects in their motivations to participate in research. Given the similarity of our subjects' motivations to those of other medically ill populations, it may be that investigators can now focus more closely on the decision-making characteristics of their patients involved in clinical research rather than their diagnoses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia Geppert
- New Mexico Veterans Affairs Health Care System - Ethics 1501 San Pedro Dr. SE University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico 87108
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Maida S, Dalla Costa G, Rodegher M, Falautano M, Comi G, Martinelli V. Overcoming recruitment challenges in patients with multiple sclerosis: Results from an Italian survey. Clin Trials 2014; 11:667-72. [DOI: 10.1177/1740774514545248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Background: Recruiting patients for randomized clinical trials is still extremely difficult. While there has been much research in oncology patients, no previous studies have consistently addressed specific factors affecting the willingness to enroll in multiple sclerosis trials from the patient’s perspective. To this end, we conducted an exploratory study to assess the related factors and to find ways to improve recruitment. Methods: This is a single-center, observational study involving 352 consecutive outpatients followed at one site in Italy. Patients completed the Enrollment Problems Questionnaire and Beck Depression Inventory. Results: Over 50% of the patients would consider participating in a randomized trial. Willing patients are frequently older, with no children, have a diagnosis of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, and have already participated in clinical trials. Patients’ choices were positively influenced by expectations of having (a) a greater chance of cure, (b) an unavailable drug, (c) a specialist’s care, and (d) the chance to contribute to medical research. Willingness was significantly increased by the use of optimistic language and practical/psychological assistance during the decision-making process. Conclusion: Multiple sclerosis patients’ willingness to participate in a randomized trial is mainly related to both altruistic and individual considerations, as well as to a greater chance of specialist/improved care. More effective information flow and an effective, long-standing patient–physician relationship may improve recruitment overall.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Maida
- Department of Neurology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Gloria Dalla Costa
- Department of Neurology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Mariaemma Rodegher
- Department of Neurology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Monica Falautano
- Psychological Service, Department of Neurology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Comi
- Department of Neurology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gruen ME, Jiamachello KN, Thomson A, Lascelles BDX. Clinical trials involving cats: what factors affect owner participation? J Feline Med Surg 2014; 16:727-35. [PMID: 24938313 DOI: 10.1177/1098612x14539499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
STUDY RATIONALE Clinical trials are frequently hindered by difficulties in recruiting eligible participants, increasing the timeline and limiting generalizability of results. In veterinary medicine, where proxy enrollment is required, no studies have detailed what factors influence owner participation in clinical trials involving cats. We aimed to investigate these factors through a survey of owners at first opinion practices. PROTOCOL The survey was designed using feedback from a pilot study and input from clinical researchers. Owners were asked demographic questions and whether they would, would not, or were unsure about participating in a clinical trial with their cat. They then ranked the importance and influence of various factors on participation using a five-point Likert-type scale, and incentives from most to least encouraging. A total of 413 surveys were distributed to cat owners at four hospitals, two feline-only and two multi-species; 88.6% were completed. Data for importance and influence factors as well as incentive rankings were analyzed overall, and by hospital type, location and whether owners would consider participating. FINDINGS The most influential factors were trust in the organization, benefit to the cat and veterinarian recommendation. Importance and influence factors varied by willingness to participate. Ranked incentives were not significantly different across groups, with 'Free Services' ranked highest. RELEVANCE This study provides a first look at what factors influence participation in clinical trials with cats. Given the importance placed in the recommendation of veterinarians, continued work is needed to determine veterinarian-related factors affecting clinical trial participation. The results provide guidance towards improved clinical trial design, promotion and education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret E Gruen
- Comparative Pain Research Laboratory, North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, USA Behavioral Medicine Service, North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, USA
| | - Katrina N Jiamachello
- Comparative Pain Research Laboratory, North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, USA
| | - Andrea Thomson
- Comparative Pain Research Laboratory, North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, USA
| | - B Duncan X Lascelles
- Comparative Pain Research Laboratory, North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, USA Center for Comparative Medicine and Translational Research, North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Laibhen-Parkes N, Codone S. Web-based evidence based practice educational intervention to improve EBP competence among BSN-prepared pediatric bedside nurses: a mixed methods pilot study. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2014. [DOI: 10.7243/2056-9157-1-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|