Linezolid Exerts Greater Bacterial Clearance but No Modification of Host Lung Gene Expression Profiling: A Mouse MRSA Pneumonia Model

Dual functional therapeutics: mitigating bacterial infection and associated inflammation

The emergence of antimicrobial resistance, coupled with the occurrence of persistent systemic infections, has already complicated clinical therapy efforts. Moreover, infections are also accompanied by strong inflammatory responses, generated by the host's innate and adaptive immune systems. The closely intertwined relationship between bacterial infection and inflammation has multiple implications on the ability of antibacterial therapeutics to tackle infection and inflammation. Particularly, uncontrolled inflammatory responses to infection can lead to sepsis, a life-threatening physiological condition. In this review, we discuss dual-functional antibacterial therapeutics that have potential to be developed for treating inflammation associated with bacterial infections. Immense research is underway that aims to develop new therapeutic agents that, when administered, regulate the excess inflammatory response, i.e. they have immunomodulatory properties along with the desired antibacterial activity. The classes of antibiotics that have immunomodulatory function in addition to antibacterial activity have been reviewed. Host defense peptides and their synthetic mimics are amongst the most sought-after solutions to develop such dual-functional therapeutics. This review also highlights the important classes of peptidomimetics that exhibit both antibacterial and immunomodulatory properties.

Antibiotics as immunomodulators: a potential pharmacologic approach for ARDS treatment

First described in the mid-1960s, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening form of respiratory failure with an overall mortality rate of approximately 40%. Despite significant advances in the understanding and treatment of ARDS, no substantive pharmacologic therapy has proven to be beneficial, and current management continues to be primarily supportive. Beyond their antibacterial activity, several antibiotics such as macrolides and tetracyclines exert pleiotropic immunomodulatory effects that might be able to rectify the dysregulated inflammatory response present in patients with ARDS. This review aims to provide an overview of preclinical and clinical studies that describe the immunomodulatory effects of antibiotics in ARDS. Moreover, the underlying mechanisms of their immunomodulatory properties will be discussed. Further studies are necessary to investigate their full therapeutic potential and to identify ARDS phenotypes which are most likely to benefit from their immunomodulatory effects.

In vivo bactericidal effect of colistin-linezolid combination in a murine model of MDR and XDR Acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia

Recently, paradoxical combinations of colistin with anti-Gram-positive bacterial agents were introduced as a treatment alternative for multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MDRAB) infection. We assessed the therapeutic efficacy of the colistin–linezolid combination regimen in vitro and in a murine model of Acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia. A multidrug-resistant clinical strain (MDRAB31) and an extensively drug-resistant clinical strain (XDRAB78) were used in this study. The survival rates of mice and bacterial counts in lung tissue were used to assess the effects of colistin–linezolid combination. The survival rates of colistin–linezolid combination groups significantly increased compared with colistin groups for MDRAB31 (72% versus 32%, P = 0.03) and for XDRAB78 (92% versus 68%, P = 0.031). The colistin–linezolid combination groups significantly reduced the bacterial counts in lung tissue compared with colistin groups for MDRAB31 and for XDRAB78 (P < 0.05). The colistin–linezolid combination had a bactericidal and synergistic effect compared with colistin alone in time-kill assay and in murine model of pneumonia. Our data demonstrated the synergistic effect of colistin–linezolid combination regimen as a treatment alternative for the severe pulmonary infection caused by MDRAB and XDRAB.

Understanding and Exploiting the Effect of Tuberculosis Antimicrobials on Host Mitochondrial Function and Bioenergetics

Almost 140 years after its discovery, tuberculosis remains the leading infectious cause of death globally. For half a century, patients with drug-sensitive and drug-resistant tuberculosis have undergone long, arduous, and complex treatment processes with several antimicrobials that primarily function through direct bactericidal activity. Long-term utilization of these antimicrobials has been well-characterized and associated with numerous toxic side-effects. With the prevalence of drug-resistant strains on the rise and new therapies for tuberculosis urgently required, a more thorough understanding of these antimicrobials is a necessity. In order to progress from the “one size fits all” treatment approach, understanding how these antimicrobials affect mitochondrial function and bioenergetics may provide further insight into how these drugs affect the overall functions of host immune cells during tuberculosis infection. Such insights may help to inform future studies, instigate discussion, and help toward establishing personalized approaches to using such antimicrobials which could help to pave the way for more tailored treatment regimens. While recent research has highlighted the important role mitochondria and bioenergetics play in infected host cells, only a small number of studies have examined how these antimicrobials affect mitochondrial function and immunometabolic processes within these immune cells. This short review highlights how these antimicrobials affect key elements of mitochondrial function, leading to further discussion on how they affect bioenergetic processes, such as glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation, and how antimicrobial-induced alterations in these processes can be linked to downstream changes in inflammation, autophagy, and altered bactericidal activity.

Linezolid and Its Immunomodulatory Effect: In Vitro and In Vivo Evidence

Recent studies have explored the effects of some antibacterial agents on various aspects of the immune response to infection in addition to their bactericidal effects. As a synthetic oxazolidinone class of antibacterial agent, linezolid (LZD) exhibits activity against a broad range of Gram-positive bacteria. In the present review, we summarized the effects of LZD on the immune response and new approaches that can exploit such interactions for the treatment of bacterial infections. In vitro and pre-clinical evidence demonstrate that LZD suppresses the phagocytic ability, cytokine synthesis, and secretion of immune cells as well as the expressions of immune-related genes at the mRNA level under the stimulation of endotoxin or pathogens. Immunomodulatory effects of LZD can not only reduce the inflammatory damage induced by exaggerated or prolonged release of pro-inflammatory cytokines during infections but can also be applied to alleviate the symptoms of non-infectious inflammatory conditions. Further research is necessary to explore the molecular mechanisms involved and confirm these findings in clinical practice.

Effects of Intracage Ammonia on Markers of Pulmonary Endothelial Integrity in Mice Housed in Static Microisolation Cages

Time-weighted exposure limits to ammonia are established for humans; however similar guidelines have not been defined for laboratory rodents. The Guide recommends maintaining air pollutants at concentrations below levels irritating to mucous membranes but does not provide specific values. Numerous studies have examined ammonia and its effects on animal health, yet none have assessed the effects of naturally occurring intracage ammonia on the lower pulmonary tree and pulmonary endothelial and epithelial integrity in mice. We performed several assays commonly used in mouse acute lung-injury studies (bronchoalveolar lavage fluid [BAL] cell counts and protein concentration, excess lung water content [ELW], Evans blue permeability assay [EBA], lung tissue myeloperoxidase assay [MPO], and lung histopathology) to evaluate the effects of exposure to cyclical, naturally occurring ammonia levels on pulmonary integrity and inflammation. C57BL/6 mice were maintained in static microisolation or open-top cages. Cages were changed weekly, and ammonia levels were measured for 6 wk on days 0, 1, 3, 5, and 7 of each cage-change cycle. Ammonia levels in static microisolation cages began to increase on day 3 and peaked at a mean of 141.3 ppm on day 7. Ammonia levels in open-top cages never exceeded 5 ppm. Neither BAL cell counts, protein concentration, ELW, EBA, nor MPO differed significantly between groups. Lung histopathology showed minimal, incidental changes in all mice. Our findings indicate that the ammonia concentrations in the static microisolation cages we used did not alter the integrity of the lower pulmonary tract nor influence key indicators used to assess acute lung injury.