Familial risks of kidney failure in Sweden: a nationwide family study

Beyond the kidney biopsy: genomic approach to undetermined kidney diseases

Background

According to data from large national registries, almost 20%-25% of patients with end-stage kidney disease have an undetermined kidney disease (UKD). Recent data have shown that monogenic disease-causing variants are under-diagnosed. We performed exome sequencing (ES) on UKD patients in our center to improve the diagnosis rate.

Methods

ES was proposed in routine practice for patients with UKD including kidney biopsy from January 2019 to December 2021. Mutations were detected using a targeted bioinformatic customized kidney gene panel (675 genes). The pathogenicity was assessed using American College of Medical Genetics guidelines.

Results

We included 230 adult patients, median age 47.5 years. Consanguinity was reported by 25 patients. A family history of kidney disease was documented in 115 patients (50%). Kidney biopsies were either inconclusive in 69 patients (30.1%) or impossible in 71 (30.9%). We detected 28 monogenic renal disorders in 75 (32.6%) patients. Collagenopathies was the most common genetic kidney diagnosis (46.7%), with COL4A3 and COL4A4 accounting for 80% of these diagnoses. Tubulopathies (16%) and ciliopathies (14.7%) yielded, respectively, the second and third genetic kidney diagnosis category and UMOD-associated nephropathy as the main genetic findings for tubulopathies (7/11). Ten of the 22 patients having ES "first" eventually received a positive diagnosis, thereby avoiding 11 biopsies. Among the 44 patients with glomerular, tubulo-interstitial or vascular nephropathy, 13 (29.5%) were phenocopies. The diagnostic yield of ES was higher in female patients (P = .02) and in patients with a family history of kidney disease (P < .0001), reaching 56.8% when the patient had both first- and second-degree family history of renal disease.

Conclusion

Genetic diagnosis has provided new clinical insights by clarifying or reclassifying kidney disease etiology in over a third of UKD patients. Exome "first" may have a significant positive diagnostic yield, thus avoiding invasive kidney biopsy; moreover, the diagnostic yield remains elevated even when biopsy is impossible or inconclusive. ES provides a clinical benefit for routine nephrological healthcare in patients with UKD.

Renal Genetics Clinic: 3-Year Experience in the Cleveland Clinic

Rationale & Objective

There has been an increasing demand for the expertise provided by a renal genetics clinic. Such programs are limited in the United States and typically operate in a genomics research setting. Here we report a 3-year, real-world, single-center renal genetics clinic experience.

Study Design

Retrospective cohort.

Setting & Participants

Outpatient cases referred to the renal genetics clinic of the Cleveland Clinic between January 2019 and March 2022 were reviewed.

Analytical Approach

Clinical and laboratory characteristics were analyzed. All genetic testing was performed in clinical labs.

Results

309 new patients referred from 15 specialties were evaluated, including 118 males and 191 females aged 35.1 ± 20.3 years. Glomerular diseases were the leading presentation followed by cystic kidney diseases, electrolyte disorders, congenital anomalies of kidneys and urinary tract, nephrolithiasis, and tubulointerstitial kidney diseases. Dysmorphic features were noted in 27 (8.7%) patients. Genetic testing was recommended in 292 (94.5%) patients including chromosomal microarray (8.9%), single-gene tests (19.5%), multigene panels (77.3%), and exome sequencing (17.5%). 80.5% of patients received insurance coverage for genetic testing. 45% (115/256) of patients had positive results, 25% (64/256) had variants of unknown significance, and 22.3% (57/256) had negative results. 43 distinct monogenic disorders were diagnosed. Family history of kidney disease was present in 52.8% of patients and associated with positive genetic findings (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.40-3.74). 69% of patients with positive results received a new diagnosis and/or a change in the diagnosis. Among these, 39.7% (31/78) of patients received a significant change in disease management.

Limitations

Retrospective and single-center study.

Conclusions

The renal genetics clinic plays important roles in the diagnosis and management of patients with genetic kidney diseases. Multigene panels are the most frequently used testing modality with a high diagnostic yield. Family history of kidney disease is a strong indication for renal genetics clinic referral.

Diagnostic and clinical utility of genetic testing in children with kidney failure

BACKGROUND

Genetic kidney disease is well established as an important cause of pediatric kidney failure, and genetic testing might increase diagnostic accuracy, but evidence is limited. This study was conducted to determine the diagnostic yield and clinical impact of genetic testing for children with kidney failure.

METHODS

Patients who were diagnosed with kidney failure before 19 years of age at Children's Hospital of Fudan University from 2009 to 2018 and received next-generation sequencing (NGS) were enrolled. The results for likely pathogenic variants in genes known to cause chronic kidney disease (CKD) were analyzed.

RESULTS

A molecular diagnosis was identified in 39.9% (75/188) of children with kidney failure. Specific subtype of clinical category was discerned in 54 (72.0%) patients, kidney disease was reclassified in 7 (9.3%) patients, the unknown etiology of 5 (6.7%) patients was molecularly diagnosed, and the clinical diagnoses of the other 9 (12.0%) patients were confirmed. In addition, genetic diagnosis was considered to have contributed to clinical management, including negating the need for kidney biopsy (26/75, 34.7%), avoiding immunosuppressive therapy (24/75, 32.0%), changing surveillance (48/75, 64.0%), guiding specific treatment (21/75, 28.0%), and guiding peri-transplant management and options for kidney transplantation (12/75, 16.0%). Furthermore, cascade testing was subsequently offered to 34.7% (26/75) of families.

CONCLUSIONS

Genetic testing identified a molecular diagnosis in nearly 40% of children with kidney failure. Our results confirm that in children with kidney failure, genetic testing can not only establish a specific molecular diagnosis, but has a significant impact on clinical management.

Family History is Important to Identify Patients with Monogenic Causes of Adult-Onset Chronic Kidney Disease

Monogenic causes of chronic kidney disease (CKD) are more prevalent in adults than previously thought, as causative gene variants are found in almost 10% of unselected patients with CKD. Even so, genetic testing in patients with adult-onset CKD is uncommon in clinical practice and the optimal criteria for patient selection remain unclear. A family history of kidney disease emerges as one marker associated with a high diagnostic yield of genetic testing. We present 3 cases of adult-onset CKD with underlying monogenic causes exemplifying different modes of inheritance. Case 1 is a 60-year-old male with slowly progressive CKD initially ascribed to hypertension and diabetes despite a family history with several affected first-degree relatives. A pathogenic MUC1 variant was found, and thus we identified the first Danish family of MUC1-associated autosomal dominant tubulointerstitial kidney disease. Case 2 is a 40-year-old female with nephrocalcinosis, nephrolithiasis, and unexplainable hypercalcemia consistent with vitamin D intoxication. The family history indicated autosomal recessive inheritance, and genetic testing revealed 2 pathogenic CYP24A1 variants in compound heterozygous form associated with idiopathic infantile hypercalcemia. Case 3 is a 50-year-old male with microscopic hematuria, proteinuria, and hearing loss. Electron microscopy of renal biopsy showed thin basal membrane syndrome, and the family history indicated X-linked inheritance. A novel missense variant in COL4A5 was identified, suggesting an atypical late-onset form of X-linked Alport syndrome. This case series illustrates the heterogeneous presentations of monogenic kidney disease in adults and emphasizes the importance of family history for initiating genetic testing to identify underlying monogenic causation. Moreover, we discuss the potential impact of genetic diagnostics on patient management and genetic family counseling.

An accessible insight into genetic findings for transplantation recipients with suspected genetic kidney disease

Determining the etiology of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) constitutes a great challenge in the context of renal transplantation. Evidence is lacking on the genetic findings for adult renal transplant recipients through exome sequencing (ES). Adult patients on kidney transplant waitlist were recruited from 2017 to 2019. Trio-ES was conducted for the families who had multiple affected individuals with nephropathy or clinical suspicion of a genetic kidney disease owing to early onset or extrarenal features. Pathogenic variants were confirmed in 62 from 115 families post sequencing for 421 individuals including 195 health family members as potential living donors. Seventeen distinct genetic disorders were identified confirming the priori diagnosis in 33 (28.7%) families, modified or reclassified the clinical diagnosis in 27 (23.5%) families, and established a diagnosis in two families with ESRD of unknown etiology. In 14.8% of the families, we detected promising variants of uncertain significance in candidate genes associated with renal development or renal disease. Furthermore, we reported the secondary findings of oncogenes in 4.4% of the patients and known single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with pharmacokinetics in our cohort to predict the drug levels of tacrolimus and mycophenolate. The diagnostic utility of the genetic findings has provided new clinical insight in most families that help with preplanned renal transplantation.

Diagnostic Yield of Next-Generation Sequencing in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease of Unknown Etiology

Advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques, including whole exome sequencing, have facilitated cost-effective sequencing of large regions of the genome, enabling the implementation of NGS in clinical practice. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major contributor to global burden of disease and is associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. CKD can be caused by a wide variety of primary renal disorders. In about one in five CKD patients, no primary renal disease diagnosis can be established. Moreover, recent studies indicate that the clinical diagnosis may be incorrect in a substantial number of patients. Both the absence of a diagnosis or an incorrect diagnosis can have therapeutic implications. Genetic testing might increase the diagnostic accuracy in patients with CKD, especially in patients with unknown etiology. The diagnostic utility of NGS has been shown mainly in pediatric CKD cohorts, while emerging data suggest that genetic testing can also be a valuable diagnostic tool in adults with CKD. In addition to its implications for unexplained CKD, NGS can contribute to the diagnostic process in kidney diseases with an atypical presentation, where it may lead to reclassification of the primary renal disease diagnosis. So far, only a few studies have reported on the diagnostic yield of NGS-based techniques in patients with unexplained CKD. Here, we will discuss the potential diagnostic role of gene panels and whole exome sequencing in pediatric and adult patients with unexplained and atypical CKD.

Relatives in silent kidney disease screening (RISKS) study: A Chinese cohort study

AIM

Family members of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have higher risk for chronic kidney disease (CKD). Limited study has examined the risk of developing CKD in relatives of patients in earlier stages of CKD.

METHODS

From January 2008 to June 2009, the Hong Kong Society of Nephrology studied first-degree relatives of stage 1-5 CKD patients from 11 local hospitals. A total of 844 relatives of 466 index CKD patients (stages 1-2: 29.6%; stage 3: 16.7%; stage 4: 10.9%; stage 5: 42.7%) were reviewed for various risk factors of CKD. We also defined a composite marker of kidney damage by the presence of one or more following features: (i) positive urine protein, (ii) spot urine protein-to-creatinine ratio ≥0.15 mg/mg, (iii) hypertension and (iv) estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≤60 mL/min per 1.73 m² and determine its association with participant and index patient factors.

RESULTS

Among these 844 relatives, 23.1%, 25.9% and 4.4% of them had proteinuria (urine protein ≥1+), haematuria (urine red blood cell ≥1+) and glycosuria (urine glucose ≥1+), respectively. Proteinuria (P = 0.10) or glycosuria (P = 0.43), however, was not associated with stages of CKD of index patients. Smoking participants had a significantly lower eGFR (102.7 vs. 107.1 mL/min per 1.73 m² ) and a higher prevalence of proteinuria (33.6% vs. 21.4%). Multivariate analysis showed that older age, male gender, obesity, being parents of index patients and being the relatives of a female index patient were independently associated with a positive composite marker.

CONCLUSION

First-degree relatives of all stages of CKD are at risk of developing CKD and deserve screening. Parents, the elderly, obese and male relatives were more likely to develop markers of kidney damage.

Heritability of End-Stage Renal Disease: A Swedish Adoption Study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The heritability of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) among adoptees has not been examined so far. By studying adoptees and their biological and adoptive parents, it is possible to differentiate between the genetic causes and environmental causes of familial aggregation. This nationwide study aimed to disentangle the genetic and shared environmental contribution to the familial transmission of ESRD.

METHODS

We performed a family study for Swedish-born adoptees (born between 1945 until 1995) and their biological and adoptive parents. The Swedish Multi-Generation Register was linked to the National Patient Registry for the period 1964-2012. ESRD was defined as patients in active uremic care, that is, chronic dialysis or kidney transplantation. OR for ESRD was determined for adoptees with an affected biological parent with ESRD compared with adoptees without a biological parent with ESRD. The OR for ESRD was also calculated in adoptees with an adoptive parent with ESRD compared with adoptees with an adoptive parent without ESRD. Moreover, heritability for ESRD was estimated with Falconer's regression.

RESULTS

A total of 111 adoptees, 463 adoptive parents, and 397 biological parents were affected by ESRD. The OR for ESRD was 6.41 in adoptees (95% CI 2.96-13.89) of biological parents diagnosed with ESRD. The OR for ESRD was 2.40 in adoptees (95% CI 0.76-7.60) of adoptive parents diagnosed with ESRD. The heritability of ESRD was 59.5 ± 18.2%.

CONCLUSION

The family history of ESRD in a biological parent is an important risk factor for ESRD. The high heritability indicates that genetic factors play an important role in understanding the etiology of ESRD.

A single nucleotide polymorphism in the UMOD promoter is associated with end stage renal disease

BACKGROUND

Several genome-wide association studies revealed that several variants of UMOD gene were related to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), CKD or hypertension. In this study, we investigated the association between a common variant rs13333226 in the promoter region of UMOD gene and end stage renal disease (ESRD).

METHODS

Variant rs13333226 of UMOD gene was genotyped by using the ABI Real time TaqMan allelic discrimination assay in a case-control study including 638 unrelated patients with ESRD and 366 controls.

RESULTS

The frequency of UMOD SNP rs13333226 GG/GA genotype was significantly higher (36.83% vs. 20.22%, P = 4.02 × 10^-8) and the frequency of G allele was much higher (19.04% vs. 11.20%, P = 4.00 × 10^-6) in the patients with ESRD than in the controls. The G allele was associated with an increased risk of ESRD (odds ratio 2.30, 95% confidence interval 1.70-3.11, P = 6.10 × 10^-8). And G allele (odds ratio 2.33, 95% confidence interval 1.32-4.13, P = 3.65 × 10^-3) was associated independently with ESRD.

CONCLUSIONS

A common variation rs13333226 in the promoter region of UMOD gene was independently associated with ESRD in Han Chinese.