Impact of Different Screw Designs on Durability of Fracture Fixation: In Vitro Study with Cyclic Loading of Scaphoid Bones

Biomechanical comparison of headless compression screws versus independent locking screw for intra-articular fractures

PURPOSE

Headless compression screws (HCS) have a variable thread pitch and headless design enabling them to embed below the articular surface and generate compression force for fracture healing without restricting movement. Locking screws have greater variety of dimensions and a threaded pitch mirroring the design of the HCS. The objective of this study is to determine whether locking screws can generate compression force and compare the compressive forces generated by HCS versus locking screws.

METHOD

A comparison between 3.5-mm HCS versus 3.5-mm locking screws and 2.8-mm HCS versus 2.7-mm locking screws was performed using a synthetic foam bone model (Synbone) and FlexiForce sensors to record the compression forces (N). The mean peak compression force was calculated from a sample of 3 screws for each screw type. Statistical analysis was performed using the one-way ANOVA test and statistical significance was determined to be p =  < 0.05.

RESULTS

The 3.5-mm Synthes and Smith and Nephew locking screws generated similar peak compression forces to the 3.5-mm Acutrak 2 headless compression screws with no statistically significant difference between them. The smaller 2.7-mm Synthes and Smith and Nephew locking screws initially generated similar compressive forces up to 1.5 and 2 revolutions, respectively, but their peak compression force was less compared to the 2.8-mm Micro Acutrak 2 HCS.

CONCLUSION

Locking screws are able to generate compressive forces and may be a viable alternative to headless compressive screws supporting their use for intra-articular fractures.

The application of a dual-lead locking screw could enhance the reduction and fixation stability of the proximal humerus fractures: a biomechanical evaluation

Introduction

Bicortical screw fixation, which penetrates and fixes the near and far cortex of bone, has been conventionally used to achieve compressive fixation for fracture using screws. Open reduction and internal fixation using the locking plate are widely used for treating proximal humerus fractures. However, minimal contact between the bone and the locking plate can lead to an insufficient reduction. Theoretically, a dual-lead locking screw with different leads for the screw head and body could enhance the reduction and fixation stability of fragments in proximal humeral fractures without bicortical fixation, and achieve additional compression at the bone-plate-screw interface. This study assessed the insertion mechanics of the lead ratio of the dual-lead locking screw and its effect on the fixation stability of the proximal humerus fracture.

Methods

A Multi-Fix® locking plating system composed of ∅ 3.5 mm locking screws and a locking plate was used to make a locked plating for Sawbone bone blocks and fourth-generation composite humeri. Two different types of Sawbone bone blocks were used to simulate the osteoporotic (10 PCF) and normal cancellous (20 PCF) bones. The lead of the screw head thread (L head ) was 0.8 mm, and that of the screw body (L body ) was 0.8, 1.25, 1.6, 2.0, and 2.4 mm, whose lead ratios (R lead = L body / L head ) were 1.0, 1.56, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0, respectively.

Results

The dual-lead locking screw elevated the compression between the locking plate and the bone. The elevation in the compression due to the dual-lead thread became weaker for the cancellous bone when the lead of the screw body was more than twice that of the screw head. The plate/humerus compression with strong bone quality withstood higher dual-lead-driven compression.

Discussion

A dual-lead locking screw of L body = 1.25 mm (R lead = 1.56 ) is recommended for maximum rotational stability for the locked humerus plating. The screws with over L body = 1.6 mm (R lead = 2 ) have no advantage in terms of the failure torque and maximum torsional deformation. Any locking dual-lead screw with a body thread lead of <1.6 mm (R lead = 2 ) can be used without the risk of bone crush when surgeons require additional compression to the locked cancellous bone plating.

The Effect of Derotational Kirschner Wires on Fracture Gap Reduction With Variable-Pitch Headless Screws

PURPOSE

We evaluated the impact of angled derotational Kirschner wires (K-wires) on fracture gap reduction with variable-pitch headless screws.

METHODS

Fully threaded variable-pitch headless screws (20 and 28 mm) were inserted into "normal" bone models of polyurethane blocks. In separate trials, derotational K-wires were inserted at predetermined angles of 0°, 15°, 30°, and 40° and compared with each other, with no K-wire as a control. Fluoroscopic images taken after each screw turn were analyzed. The optimal fracture gap closure, initial screw push-off, and screw back-out gap creation were determined and compared at various derotational K-wire angles.

RESULTS

Initial screw push-off due to screw insertion and screw back-out gap creation were not significantly affected by the angle of the derotational K-wire. With a 20-mm screw, only a 40° derotational K-wire led to significantly less gap closure compared with control and with 0°, 15°, and 30° derotational K-wires. It led to an approximately 60% decrease in gap closure compared with no K-wire. With the 28-mm screw, compared with no K-wire, 15° and 30° derotational K-wires led to statistically significant decreases in gap closure (approximately 25%), whereas a 40° derotational K-wire led to an approximately 60% decrease. With the 28-mm screw, the 40° derotational K-wire also led to a statistically significant smaller gap closure when compared with 0°, 15°, and 30° derotational K-wires.

CONCLUSIONS

A derotational K-wire placed in parallel to the planned trajectory of a headless compression screw does not affect fracture gap closure. With greater angulation of the derotational K-wire, the fracture gap is still closed, but less tightly.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Derotational K-wires can help prevent fracture fragment rotation during headless compression screw insertion. At small deviations from parallel (≤30°), fracture gap closure achieved by the screw is minimally affected. At greater angles (ie, 40°), fracture gap closure may be substantially reduced, preventing fracture compression.

Comparison of Minimally Invasive Operative Treatment with Conservative Treatment for Acute, Minimally Displaced Scaphoid Fractures at 12 Months' Follow-up

Background  Minimally displaced scaphoid fractures can be challenging to diagnose and treat. Cannulated scaphoid screws have made percutaneous stabilization highly effective. Questions  Would minimally invasive operative treatment of minimally displaced scaphoid fractures yield faster return to work when compared with patients treated conservatively? How do functional and patient satisfaction scores compare between the two groups at 12-months follow-up? Patients and Methods  Records from 18 patients (mean age 28.6 years) treated surgically were retrospectively reviewed and compared with a group of 10 patients (mean age 33.3 years, p  = 0.74) treated nonoperatively. Inclusion criteria were a minimum follow-up period of 12 months and radiographic union. Time to return to work was compared between groups. At 12 months' follow-up, wrist range of motion (ROM) and grip strength were compared, as well as pain, satisfaction, and overall wrist function were evaluated by the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Mayo modified wrist score (MMWS). Results  The mean time to return to work for the operated group was 39.75 days, while for the nonoperated group it was 88.14 days ( p  = 0.002). At the 12 months' follow-up, mean ROM, grip strength, and VAS score did not differ between groups. The mean MMWS was 98.75 for the operated group and 87.5 for the nonoperated group, indicating a better result in patients treated operatively ( p  = 0.03). In addition, two failures of instrumentation were recorded, a seldom seen complication. Conclusion  Percutaneous fixation of minimally displaced scaphoid fractures allows faster return to work and leaves patients more satisfied with their wrist function compared with plaster immobilization at 12 months' follow-up. Level of evidence  This is a Level III, retrospective, case-control study.

Pull-out forces of headless compression screws in variations of synthetic bone models imitating different types of scaphoid fractures in good bone quality

Screw osteosynthesis using headless compression screws has become the accepted gold standard for the surgical treatment of scaphoid fractures. Optimal screw specifications remain controversially discussed. We aimed to investigate the influence of bone model composition on screw stability tests using headless compression screws in different scaphoid fracture models. We conducted pull-out tests using Acutrak2^®mini, HCS^®, HKS^®, HBS^®, Herbert/Whipple^® and Twinfix^® screws. To imitate cortical and cancellous bone, two-layer polyurethane (PU) models with two distinct densities were produced. The cylinders were cut at different positions to replicate fracture localisations at increasing distances. The maximum pull-out force required to achieve up to 1 mm of pull-out distance (N_{to 1 mm}) was measured. Acutrak2^®mini and HCS^® followed by Twinfix^® showed the greatest average pull-out forces. N_{to 1 mm} was, on average, greater in the cortico-cancellous model than in the cancellous cylinder with the Acutrak2^®mini and the Herbert/Whipple^® screws, while it was the least with the HBS^® and the Twinfix^® screws; there were also differences between the HCS^® and HKS^®. There were no differences between the different fracture simulations in the synthesis strength using either the HKS^® or HBS^®. The pull-out forces of the HCS^® and Twinfix^® remained high also in simulations with the smaller screw base fragments. Varying imitations of cancellous and cortico-cancellous bone and fracture localisation reveal important information about the ex vivo strength of screw syntheses. The grip of the cortical structure should be used with the screws that fit more firmly in cortico-cancellous bone.

Which Headless Compression Screw Produces the Highest Interfragmentary Compression Force in Scaphoid Fracture?

BACKGROUND

Interfragmentary compression at the fracture site facilitates healing. Headless compression screws used to treat scaphoid fractures can be grouped as shank screws, conical tapered screws and double component screws. There has been no meta-analysis of biomechanical studies to compare interfragmentary compression produced by the above screws.

METHODS

A computerised search of Pubmed, Embase and OVID database was undertaken to identify the studies. We estimated the weighted mean difference of interfragmentary compression (in Newton) with 95% confidence intervals. Random effects model was selected for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The pooled estimate of nine studies demonstrated that conical tapered screw produced significantly higher interfragmentary compression force compared to the shank screw (WMD 19.96, 95% CI 11.2-28.8, p < 0.0001, I ² = 99%). The pooled estimate of four studies demonstrated that dual component screw produced significantly higher interfragmentary compression force compared to the shank screw (WMD 16.93, 95% CI 12.3-21.6, p < 0.0001, I ² = 97.7%). The pooled estimate of four studies showed that there was no significant difference in the interfragmentary compression force generated by either conical tapered screw or dual component screw (WMD 3.93, 95% CI - 8.3 to 16.2, p = 0.53, I ² = 99.7%). There was evidence of minimal publication bias.

CONCLUSION

Conical tapered screws and dual component screws produced statistically significant higher interfragmentary compression force at the scaphoid fracture site compared to shank screws. There was no difference in the compression force generated by either conical tapered screw or dual component screw.

Deviations in positioning variable pitch screws- scaphoid waist fractures

INTRODUCTION

Operative therapy using a headless cannulated variable pitch compression screw is the gold standard for the treatment of instable scaphoid fractures.

HYPOTHESIS

Deviation from the central placement is associated with a loss of stability and stiffness.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An artificial bone model was manufactured and different screw positions (central, 10° and 20° to the long axis) were assessed. A shearing test with axial force on the 45° flexed scaphoid was applied.

RESULTS

The inserted variable pitch screw showed the highest stiffness and failure force in a position in the long axis. At 10 degrees, a slight decrease in stiffness (32.7N/mm±9.3N/mm) and failure force (41.6N±13.2N) was observed, while a significant reduction in stiffness (29.3N/mm±4.6N/mm) and failure force (50.3N±19.5N) was measured at 20 degrees.

DISCUSSION

Deviations in the angle of insertion of the compression screw cause loss in failure force, thus deviations from the central placement is associated with less stability and stiffness.

LEVEL OF PROOF

Controlled laboratory study (basic science study, biomechanical testing).

Impact of Screw Length on Proximal Scaphoid Fracture Biomechanics

Background  Proximal scaphoid fractures display high nonunion rates and increased revision cases. Waist fracture fixation involves maximizing screw length within the cortex; however, the optimal screw length for proximal scaphoid fractures remains unknown. Purpose  The main purpose of this article is to compare stiffness and ultimate load for proximal scaphoid fracture fixation of various headless compression screw lengths. Methods  Eighteen scaphoids underwent an osteotomy simulating a 7 mm oblique proximal fracture. Screws of three lengths (10, 18, and 24 mm) were randomly assigned for fixation. Each specimen underwent cyclic loading with stiffness calculated during the last loading cycle. Specimens that withstood cyclic loading were loaded to failure. Results  No significant difference in stiffness between screw lengths was found. Ultimate load was significantly impacted by the screw length. A significant difference in ultimate load between a 10 and 24 mm screw was found; however, no significant difference occurred in ultimate load between an 18 and 24 mm screw. Conclusions  No significant difference in stiffness between all groups could be due to similarities in purchase in the proximal aspect. The 10 mm screw withstanding less ultimate load compared to the 24 mm screw could be due to the 10 mm screw gaining less purchase on either side of the fracture site compared to the 24 mm screw. Lack of significant difference in ultimate load between the 18 and 24 mm screw could be occurring because the fracture site is closer to the 18 mm screw midpoint, as distal threads are engaged closer to the fracture. Clinical Relevance  Maximizing screw length may not provide superior fixation biomechanically compared with fixation utilizing a 6 mm shorter screw for proximal scaphoid fractures.

A comparative study of the effect of drilling depth on generation of compressive force by headless compression screws using conical and cylindrical type of drill bit

Background

This study was conducted to measure the effect of different drilling depths on compression forces generated by two commonly used headless compression screws using the two different types of drill bit, the Acutrak® mini (conical type drill bit) and the Synthes 3.0 HCS® (cylindrical type drill bit).

Methods

A load cell was placed between two Sawbone blocks, which were 12 mm and 40 mm in thickness, respectively. After placing the guide pin into the center of the block, the drilling depth of the Acutrak® mini and Synthes HCS® screws ranged from 16 to 28 mm and 22 to 28 mm, respectively. The 24-mm screws were inserted and the compression force was measured immediately and at 30 min post-insertion.

Results

The Acutrak® mini generated greater compression force compared to the Synthes 3.0 HCS® when drilled to a depth of less than 24 mm. The compression force of the Acutrak® mini showed a strong inverse correlation with the drilling depth. There was no significant inverse correlation observed between the compression force of the Synthes HCS® and the drilling depth.

Conclusions

If the screw length and the drill depth are the same, the Synthes 3.0 HCS® (cylindrical type drill bit) is safer and easier to use as it has no change in the compression force even when over-drilling because the compression force of the two screws is similar. As for the Acutrak® mini (conical type drill bit), while it is technically demanding due to varying compression force according to the drill depth, it can be used in certain cases because it can give stronger compression force through under-drilling.

The Scaphoid Safe Zone: A Radiographic Simulation Study to Prevent Cortical Perforation Arising from Different Views

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to simulate and calculate the probability of iatrogenic perforation of the scaphoid cortical bone when internal fixation appeared to be safe on radiographs. The results will assist surgeons in determining proper screw placement.

METHODS

Thirty scaphoids were reconstructed using computed tomography data and image-processing software. Different central axes were determined by the software to simulate the surgical views. The safe zone (SZ) and risk zone (RZ) were identified on the axial projection radiographs by comparing the scaphoid bone stenosis measured by the fluoroscopic radiographs with a three-dimensional reconstruction of the scaphoid stenosis. Each original axial projection radiograph was zoomed and compiled to match a calculated average image. The RZ, SZ, and probability of perforations in various quadrants were calculated.

RESULTS

Using a volar view (approach), the mean risks of cortical perforation were 25% with screws and 36% with k-wires. Using a dorsal view (approach), the mean risks of cortical perforation were 18% with screws and 30% with k-wires. A high risk of perforation was detected at the ulnar-dorsal zone.

CONCLUSION

Surgeons should be wary of screws that appear to lie close to the scaphoid cortex on both anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs, particularly in the ulnar-dorsal and radial-dorsal quadrants, because such screws are likely to perforate the cortex. The position of the internal fixator should be assessed using a diagram outlining the various SZs. Therapeutic, Level III.

Self-drilling and self-tapping miniscrews for osteosynthesis fixture after LeFort I osteotomy: An ex vivo trial for primary stability and a randomized clinical study

BACKGROUND

Self-drilling osteosynthesis screws (SDS) have a potential higher primary stability together with clinical advantages such as less time effort compared to self-tapping screws (STS). The aims of the study were to compare the primary stability of SDS and STS ex vivo and to analyze of the time-saving effect in vivo.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ex vivo, both screws were placed in porcine bone. Torque was measured for insertion and removal. Four specimens were kept in bone for histologic bone-to-implant-contact examination. In vivo, 49 patients who received orthognathic surgery in the maxilla were included in 2 centers. In a split-mouth design, the time for osteosynthesis fixation and perioperative events were recorded.

RESULTS

Ex vivo, insertion and removal torque measurements were higher for SDS, especially in dense bone. Histologic imaging on the exemplary-stained specimens showed higher bone contact and compressed bone matrix for SDS in all bone densities. In vivo, the mean osteosynthesis time in both centers was 5.5 min (±3.03) for SDS and 5.5 min (±2.37) for STS. Separate analysis showed that center I was faster with STS and center II with SDS. Although, in center I a higher rate of failed primary stability of SDS compared to STS was documented.

CONCLUSIONS

SDS showed a partially higher primary stability ex vivo, especially in dense bone. The timesaving effect of SDS is less pronounced than expected, but technically SDS might be favorable where drilling is difficult or even impossible.