Anti-carbamylated protein autoantibodies associated with mortality in Spanish rheumatoid arthritis patients

Anti-Carbamylated Protein Antibodies in ACPA-Negative and ACPA-Positive Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

The objective of this study was to assess the level of antibodies to carbamylated proteins and analyze the clinical and immunological associations in patients with ACPA-negative and ACPA-positive variants of rheumatoid arthritis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

. The study involved 150 patients with a reliable diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and 25 patients as healthy controls. Depending on ACPA values, two groups of patients were recruited: ACPA-positive (n = 75) and ACPA-negative (n = 75). RA activity was assessed by the DAS28 index. Determination of antibodies to carbamylated proteins was performed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (BlueGene Biotech, China). Quantitative determination of ACPA in serum was performed by enzyme immunoassay using a commercial reagent kit (AxisShield, UK; upper limit of normal 5.0 U/mL; Orgentec, Germany; upper limit of normal 20.0 U/mL).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

. Median anti-CarP in patients with RA was 126.2 [100.83; 157.41] ng/mL and was statistically significantly higher (p < 0.001) than in healthy controls (88.89 [70.53; 107.75] ng/mL). Among all patients with RA, 50 (33.3%) were anti-Carp-positive (22 (29.3%) in the ACPA(+) group and 28 (37.3%) in the ACPA(-) group), and one (2%) volunteer from healthy controls was anti-CarP(+) (p = 0.002). In ROC analysis performed to assess the diagnostic significance of anti-CarP for RA for all patients with RA, the area under the curve was 0.783 ± 0.047 with 95% CI: 0.691-0.874 (p < 0.001), with a cut-off point of 143 ng/mL, specificity 96%, sensitivity 36.7%. In the ACPA(+) RA group, the erosion count was statistically significantly higher (p = 0.044) in anti-CarP(+) patients than in anti-CarP(-) patients. A weak direct correlation between anti-CarP and DAS28 was found in the ACPA(-) RA group.

CONCLUSIONS

. We studied the predictive value of anti-CarP as an auxiliary biomarker in ACPA(+) and ACPA(-) subtypes of RA. ACPA(+) anti-CarP(+) patients have a more "erosive" subtype of the disease than ACPA(+) anti-CarP(-) patients. In ACPA(-) patients, anti-CarP helps to identify a more erosive subtype of the disease, and among ACPA(-) patients it helps to reduce the proportion of seronegative patients. Further studies are required to determine the optimal standards for the laboratory diagnosis of anti-CarP and to clarify the diagnostic potential of these ABs as part of the differential diagnosis of arthritis in other rheumatic diseases.

Redefining seropositive rheumatoid arthritis: Clinical implications of anti-carbamylated protein on remission, radiographic damage and quality of life

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic disabling disease where continued disease activity translates to irreversible articular damage. Seropositivity for rheumatoid factor (RF) and anticitrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) are markers of poorer prognosis; with increased disease activity, radiographic progression and even mortality.1 However, other than ACPA, no other biomarker has emerged for clinical use in the last 10 years.

Distribution and clinical significance of anti-carbamylation protein antibodies in rheumatological diseases among the Chinese Han population

Objective

Several studies have demonstrated that anti-carbamylation protein antibodies (Anti-CarPA) are persistent in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis (SSC), primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS), and interstitial lung disease associated with RA (RA-ILD). However, the relationship between anti-CarPA and other rheumatic diseases (RDs) and non-RA-ILD is not known till now. This study sought to examine the presence of anti-CarPA in Chinese Han patients with RDs and its clinical significance.

Methods

The study included 90 healthy controls (HCs) and 300 patients with RDs, including RA, SLE, polymyositis/dermatomyositis (PM/DM), pSS, SSC, spondyloarthritis (SpA), anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies associated with vasculitis (AAV), undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD), and Behcet's disease (BD). Antibodies against carbamylated human serum albumin were detected using commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. Correlations between clinical and laboratory parameters were analyzed.

Result

Serum levels of anti-CarPA in RA (34.43 ± 33.34 ng/ml), SLE (21.12 ± 22.23 ng/ml), pSS (16.32 ± 13.54 ng/ml), PM/DM (30.85 ± 17.34 ng/ml), SSC (23.53 ± 10.70 ng/ml), and UCTD (28.35 ± 21.91 ng/ml) were higher than those of anti-CarPA in the HCs (7.30 ± 5.05 ng/ml). The concentration of serum anti-CarPA was higher in patients with rheumatic disease-related interstitial lung disease (RD-ILD), especially RA-ILD, PM/DM-ILD, and pSS-ILD. Patients with RD-ILD who tested positive for anti-CarPA were more likely to have a more severe radiographic classification (grades II, p = 0.045; grades III, p = 0.003). Binary logistic regression analysis suggested that anti-CarPA had an association with ILD in RA (p = 0.033), PM/DM (p = 0.039), and pSS (p = 0.048). Based on receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis, anti-CarPA cutoffs best discriminated ILD in RA (>32.59 ng/ml, p = 0.050), PM/DM (>23.46 ng/ml, p = 0.038), and pSS (>37.08 ng/ml, p = 0.040). Moreover, serum levels of anti-CarPA were correlated with antibodies against transcription intermediary factor 1 complex (anti-TIF1) (R = -0.28, p = 0.044), antibodies against glycyl-transfer ribonucleic acid synthetase (anti-EJ) (R = 0.30, p = 0.031), and antibodies against melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (anti-MDA5) (R = 0.35, p = 0.011).

Conclusion

Serum anti-CarPA could be detected in patients with RA, PM/DM, pSS, SSC, and UCTD among the Chinese Han population. And it may also assist in identifying ILD in patients with RA, PM/DM, and pSS, which emphasized attention to the lung involvement in anti-CarPA-positive patients.

Neutrophil extracellular trap-associated carbamylation and histones trigger osteoclast formation in rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Neutrophil infiltration into the synovial joint is a hallmark of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a disease characterised by progressive bone erosion. However, the mechanisms by which neutrophils participate in bone destruction remain unclear. Carbamylation is a posttranslational modification linked to increased bone erosion in RA and we previously showed that carbamylation is present in RA neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). However, it remains unclear whether NETs and their carbamylated protein cargo directly promote bone destruction and alter osteoclast biology.

METHODS

NETs and carbamylated NETs (cNETs) were assessed for their capacity to induce osteoclast formation in CD14+ monocytes. Chemical inhibitors and neutralising antibodies were used to elucidate the pathway by which NETs induce osteoclastogenesis. HLA-DRB1*04:01 mice received intra-articular injection of cNETs for 4 weeks. Joints were isolated and assessed for osteoclast formation. Plasma and synovial fluid samples from patients with RA (n=32) were assessed for the presence of carbamylated histone, and correlations to disease specific outcomes were performed.

RESULTS

We found that NETs, when cNETs, instruct monocytes to undergo rapid osteoclast formation. NET-mediated osteoclastogenesis appears to depend on Toll-like receptor 4 signalling and NET-associated proteins including histones and neutrophil elastase. In vivo, we identified that the number of osteoclasts increased following immunisation with cNETs in HLA-DRB1*04:01 transgenic mice. Furthermore, carbamylated histones are increased in plasma and synovial fluid from patients with RA and correlate with active bone resorption and inflammatory markers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that NETs have a direct role in RA-associated bone erosion by promoting osteoclast formation.

Anti-Carbamylated Protein (Anti-CarP) Antibodies in Patients Evaluated for Suspected Rheumatoid Arthritis

(1) Background: Anti-carbamylated protein (CarP) antibodies have been studied as novel markers to aid in the diagnosis and prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis. (2) Methods: A total of 265 samples were included in the evaluation, for which 98 had results for anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP), 86 for rheumatoid factor (RF), and 212 for 14-3-3 eta protein. Anti-CarP antibodies were measured using a fetal calf serum-based single-step assay (research use only, Inova Diagnostics, San Diego, CA). (3) Results: Anti-CarP antibodies were significantly higher and more frequent in anti-CCP3.1+ (p = 0.0025), RF+ (p = 0.0043) and 14-3-3 eta+ (p = 0.028) samples compared to the negative counterpart group. In addition, isolated anti-CarP positivity occurred in samples negative for anti-CCP3.1, RF, or 14-3-3 eta. When anti-CarP antibodies were compared to each of the RF, anti-CCP3.1, and 14-3-3 eta by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, the area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.71 (RF), 0.68 (anti-CCP3.1), and 0.59 (14-3-3 eta), respectively, demonstrated a moderate correlation. Using an UpSet plot, we determined that 10.6% of the samples with available results for anti-CCP3.1, RF, and anti-CarP showed triple positivity. (4) Conclusions: Anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP) antibodies can be detected in anti-CCP, RF and 14-3-3 eta-positive and -negative patients, potentially identifying specific subsets of patients.

Anti-carbamylated protein antibodies positivity and disease activity in Hispanic patients with established rheumatoid arthritis: An observational study

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to determine the prevalence of anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP) antibodies in Mexican Hispanics with established rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to assess their relationship with disease activity.

METHODS

A cohort study was conducted in 278 patients with established RA during an 18-month follow-up. We measured IgG/IgM/IgA rheumatoid factor (RF), IgG anticitrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) and IgG/IgM/IgA anti-CarP antibodies using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). For disease activity, we performed the 28-joint disease activity score with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR). Repeated measures one-way ANOVA was used to test the association between anti-CarP IgG antibody status and longitudinal DAS28-ESR scores. Patients were evaluated at baseline and at 6, 12, and 18 months during follow-up.

RESULTS

Anti-CarP IgG antibodies were positive in 47.8% of patients and, accounting for all isotypes, in 9.5% of patients with negative RF and ACPA. Triple antibody positivity was present in 42.6% of patients in our sample. Anti-CarP IgG antibody positivity did not show statistically significant differences in mean DAS28-ESR when compared to anti-CarP IgG antibody negative patients at baseline, 6, 12 or 18 months.

CONCLUSION

Anti-CarP IgG antibodies are not associated to a higher disease activity in Hispanic patients with established RA. Our findings suggest that the clinical value of measuring anti-CarP antibodies in RA diminishes over time.

Increased disease activity in early arthritis patients with anti-carbamylated protein antibodies

The initial management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has a high impact on disease prognosis. Therefore, we need to select the most appropriate treatment as soon as possible. This goal requires biomarkers of disease severity and prognosis. One such biomarker may be the presence of anti-carbamylated protein antibodies (ACarPA) because it is associated with adverse long term outcomes as radiographic damage and mortality. Here, we have assessed the ACarPA as short-term prognostic biomarkers. The study was conducted in 978 prospective early arthritis (EA) patients that were followed for two years. Our results show the association of ACarPA with increased levels of all the disease activity measures in the first visit after arthritis onset. However, the associations were more significant with the high levels in local measures of inflammation and physician assessment than with the increases in systemic inflammation and patient-reported outcomes. More notably, disease activity was persistently increased in the ACarPA positive patients during the two years of follow-up. These differences were significant even after accounting for the presence of other RA autoantibodies. Therefore, the ACarPA could be considered short-term prognostic biomarkers of increased disease activity in the EA patients.

Do anti-carbamylated protein antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis reflect local and systemic osteoporosis? A study of osteoprotegrin and receptor activator for nuclear factor kappa B ligand and radiological assessment

Background

One of the most important and dangerous complications of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is bone loss, which manifested by erosions and juxta-articular or systemic bone loss. Anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP) antibodies which are also called anti-homocitrulline antibodies have recently been found in RA. Increase anti-CarP antibody titres may lead to severe disease and increase the progression of bone loss. Osteoprotegrin and receptor activator for nuclear factor kappa B and its ligand (RANKL) are the main players in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis. Thus, we aimed to investigate and detect the presence and prevalence of anti-CarP in rheumatoid arthritis and their association with disease severity and osteoporosis, as well as with OPG/RANKL in 80 Egyptian RA patients to highlight this relationship which could be useful in managing RA patients with osteoporosis.

Results

Serum anti-CarP levels were significantly increased in the RA group compared with the control group (P< 0.001). We found a negative association between anti-CarP and anti-CCP and disease activity (r=−0.878, −0.534, respectively, P<0.001). We also found a positive correlation between anti-CarP and the Larsen score, DEXA score, RF, HAQ, and RANKL (r=0.646, 0.287, 0.243, 0.892, 0.671, 0.869 [respectively], P<0.001) and there was negative correlation between anti-CarP and OPG (r=−0.553, P<0.001).

Conclusion

Anti-CarP antibodies are associated with disease severity and disability in RA patients. They could play an important and significant role in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis in these patients.

The value of anti-CarP and anti-PAD4 as markers of rheumatoid arthritis in ACPA/RF negative rheumatoid arthritis patients

Background:

Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) and rheumatoid factor (RF) are key factors in the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism rheumatoid arthritis (RA) classification criteria markers. However, about 30% of patients diagnosed with RA are seronegative, rationalizing the need for new serologic markers for RA. Antibodies against carbamylated proteins (anti-CarP) and against peptidyl-arginine deiminase type 4 (anti-PAD4) have been postulated to be useful RA markers. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the value of anti-CarP and anti-PAD4 in a well-characterized population of RA patients and healthy controls (HCs).

Methods:

A total of 122 RA patients and 30 HCs were enrolled in the study. Serum levels of ACPA, anti-PAD4, anti-CarP and RF were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent immunoassays (ELISAs). Synthetic carbamylated peptides were used in the ELISA assay to determine the protein targets of the anti-CarP antibodies.

Results:

Rates of ACPA, RF, anti-PAD4 and anti-CarP positivity were 85.2%, 67.2%, 55.7% and 46.7% in RA, and 0%, 0%, 6.7% and 6.7% in HC respectively. In the RA population, 25.4% of patients had all four types of antibodies positive, while 6.6% had no antibodies. There was a significant correlation between anti-PAD4 and ACPAs (r_s = 0.39), RF and ACPAs, (r_s = 0.3) and RF and anti-CarP, (r_s = 0.3). There was no correlation between ACPAs and anti-CarP. Anti-CarP positivity was noted in 49 (47.1%) and 45 (54.9%) of ACPAs and RF positive patients respectively. In addition, five anti-CarP+ patients did not have ACPA nor RF.

Conclusion:

Anti-CarP but not anti-PAD4 may be a useful biomarker in identifying ACPA/RF negative RA patients. This antibody may identify an additional RA population who may benefit from early implementation of aggressive therapy.

Neutrophil-mediated carbamylation promotes articular damage in rheumatoid arthritis

Formation of autoantibodies to carbamylated proteins (anti-CarP) is considered detrimental in the prognosis of erosive rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The source of carbamylated antigens and the mechanisms by which anti-CarP antibodies promote bone erosion in RA remain unknown. Here, we find that neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) externalize carbamylated proteins and that RA subjects develop autoantibodies against carbamylated NET (cNET) antigens that, in turn, correlate with levels of anti-CarP. Transgenic mice expressing the human RA shared epitope (HLADRB1* 04:01) immunized with cNETs develop antibodies to citrullinated and carbamylated proteins. Furthermore, anti-carbamylated histone antibodies correlate with radiographic bone erosion in RA subjects. Moreover, anti-carbamylated histone-immunoglobulin G immune complexes promote osteoclast differentiation and potentiate osteoclast-mediated matrix resorption. These results demonstrate that carbamylated proteins present in NETs enhance pathogenic immune responses and bone destruction, which may explain the association between anti-CarP and erosive arthritis in RA.

Anti-carbamylated proteins antibody repertoire in rheumatoid arthritis: evidence of a new autoantibody linked to interstitial lung disease

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the association between anti-carbamylated protein antibodies (Anti-CarP) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study including RA patients fulfilling the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria. The main population comprised two groups: (1) RA patients diagnosed with RA-ILD (RA-ILD group); (2) RA patients without ILD (non-ILD RA group). Non-ILD RA patients in whom ILD was suspected underwent a diagnostic work-up and, if ILD was diagnosed, were switched to the RA-ILD group. ILD was diagnosed by high-resolution computed tomography and confirmed by a multidisciplinary committee. An independent replication sample was also obtained. Three Anti-CarP IgG autoantibodies against fetal calf serum (Anti-FCS), fibrinogen (Anti-Fib) and chimeric fibrine/filagrine homocitrullinated peptide (Anti-CFFHP) and one Anti-CarP IgA against FCS (Anti-FCS-IgA) were determined by home-made ELISA. Associations between Anti-CarP and ILD were analysed using multivariable logistic regression adjusted by smoking, sex, age, RA disease duration, rheumatoid factor and anticitrullinated protein antibodies.

RESULTS

We enrolled 179 patients: 37 (21%) were finally diagnosed with RA-ILD. Anti-CarP specificities were more frequent in RA-ILD patients (Anti-FCS 70% vs 43%; Anti-Fib 73% vs 51%; Anti-CFFHP 38% vs 19%; Anti-CarP-IgA 51% vs 20%, p<0.05 for all comparisons). Serum titers of Anti-CarP were significantly higher in RA-ILD patients. Anti-CarP specificities showed a robust effect towards increasing the odds of ILD in the multivariate analysis (Anti-FCS (OR: 3.42; 95% CI: 1.13 to 10.40), Anti-Fib (OR: 2.85; 95% CI: 0.83 to 9.70), Anti-CFFHP (OR: 3.11; 95% CI: 1.06 to 9.14) and Anti-FCS-IgA (OR: 4.30; 95% CI: 1.41 to 13.04)). Similar findings were observed in the replication sample.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-CarP were strongly associated with ILD. The role of homocitrullination in RA-ILD merits further investigation.

Autoantibodies as Diagnostic Markers and Mediator of Joint Inflammation in Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis is a systemic, polygenic, and multifactorial syndrome characterized by erosive polyarthritis, damage to joint architecture, and presence of autoantibodies against several self-structures in the serum and synovial fluid. These autoantibodies (anticitrullinated protein/peptide antibodies (ACPAs), rheumatoid factors (RF), anticollagen type II antibodies, antiglucose-6 phosphate isomerase antibodies, anticarbamylated protein antibodies, and antiacetylated protein antibodies) have different characteristics, diagnostic/prognostic value, and pathological significance in RA patients. Some of these antibodies are present in the patients' serum several years before the onset of clinical disease. Various genetic and environmental factors are associated with autoantibody production against different autoantigenic targets. Both the activating and inhibitory FcγRs and the activation of different complement cascades contribute to the downstream effector functions in the antibody-mediated disease pathology. Interplay between several molecules (cytokines, chemokines, proteases, and inflammatory mediators) culminates in causing damage to the articular cartilage and bones. In addition, autoantibodies are proven to be useful disease markers for RA, and different diagnostic tools are being developed for early diagnosis of the clinical disease. Recently, a direct link was proposed between the presence of autoantibodies and bone erosion as well as in the induction of pain. In this review, the diagnostic value of autoantibodies, their synthesis and function as a mediator of joint inflammation, and the significance of IgG-Fc glycosylation are discussed.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Anticarbamylated Protein Antibodies in Established Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Monocentric Cross-Sectional Study

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of anticarbamylated protein antibodies (CarP), alone and in combination with traditional biomarkers (rheumatoid factor [RF] and anticitrullinated peptide antibodies [ACPA]), in established rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

A commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit was used to assess CarP concentrations in serum samples of 200 established RA and 206 controls (115 healthy donors and 55 patients with other rheumatic diseases). Main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC; 95% confidence interval [CI]). Difference in accuracy was evaluated by comparison of the respective AUCs.

Results

A serum CarP cut-off of 1.47 ng/ml or more differentiated patients with RA from controls with 30% sensitivity, 97.1% specificity, and good accuracy (AUC[95%CI] = 0.83[0.79-0.86], P < 0.0001). However, it showed moderate diagnostic accuracy in seronegative RA patients: sensitivity 17.9%, specificity 96.9%, and AUC (95% CI) = 0.69 (0.63-0.75). The diagnostic accuracy of CarP_ACPA and CarP_RF combinations was significantly superior to that of ACPA and RF alone (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.015, respectively), but not to that of ACPA_RF combination (P = 0.089) In addition, the CarP_ACPA_RF combination did not improve the diagnostic accuracy of the ACPA_RF combination (AUC mean difference [95% CI] = 0.006 [-0.001 to 0.015], P = 0.10). The number of positive autoantibodies (0, 1, 2, or 3) was not significantly associated with moderate-severe disease (Disease Activity Score-28 [DAS-28] > 3.2) in adjusted multiple regression analysis.

Conclusion

CarP has good diagnostic accuracy in established RA but not in seronegative RA. The addition of CarP to ACPA and RF alone or in combination does not significantly enhance the diagnostic accuracy of ACPA_RF combination.

Guidelines for biomarkers in autoimmune rheumatic diseases - evidence based analysis

Autoimmune rheumatic diseases are characterised by an abnormal immune system response, complement activation, cytokines dysregulation and inflammation. In last years, despite many progresses in managing these patients, it has been shown that clinical remission is reached in less than 50% of patients and a personalised and tailored therapeutic approach is still lacking resulting in a significant gap between guidelines and real-world practice. In this context, the need for biomarkers facilitating early diagnosis and profiling those individuals at the highest risk for a poor outcome has become of crucial interest. A biomarker generally refers to a measured characteristic which may be used as an indicator of some biological state or condition. Three different types of medical biomarkers has been suggested: i. mechanistic markers; ii. clinical disease markers; iii. therapeutic markers. A combination of biomarkers from these different groups could be used for an ideal more accurate diagnosis and treatment. However, although a growing body of evidence is focused on improving biomarkers, a significant amount of this information is not integrated on standard clinical care. The overarching aim of this work was to clarify the meaning of specific biomarkers during autoimmune diseases; their possible role in confirming diagnosis, predicting outcome and suggesting specific treatments.

Triple Positivity for Anti-Citrullinated Protein Autoantibodies, Rheumatoid Factor, and Anti-Carbamylated Protein Antibodies Conferring High Specificity for Rheumatoid Arthritis: Implications for Very Early Identification of At-Risk Individuals

OBJECTIVE

In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) and rheumatoid factor (RF) are commonly used to aid in the diagnosis. Although these autoantibodies are mainly found in RA, their specificity is not optimal. It is therefore difficult to identify RA patients, especially in very early disease, based on the presence of ACPAs and RF alone. In addition, anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP) antibodies have diagnostic and prognostic value, since their presence is associated with joint damage in RA patients and also associated with the future development of RA in patients with arthralgia. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the value of combined antibody testing in relation to prediction and diagnosis of (early) RA.

METHODS

A literature search resulted in identification of 12 relevant studies, consisting of RA patients, pre-RA individuals, disease controls, healthy first-degree relatives of RA patients, and healthy control subjects, in which data on RF, ACPAs, and anti-CarP antibody status were available. Using these data, random effects meta-analyses were carried out for several antibody combinations.

RESULTS

The individual antibodies were highly prevalent in patients with RA (34-80%) compared to the control groups, but were also present in non-RA controls (0-23%). For the classification of most subjects correctly as having RA or as a non-RA control, the combination of ACPAs and/or RF often performed well (specificity 65-100%, sensitivity 59-88%). However, triple positivity for ACPAs, RF, and anti-CarP antibodies resulted in a higher specificity for RA (98-100%), accompanied by a lower sensitivity (11-39%).

CONCLUSION

As the rheumatology field is moving toward very early identification of RA and possible screening for individuals at maximum risk of RA in populations with a low pretest probability, an autoantibody profile of triple positivity for ACPAs, RF, and anti-CarP provides interesting information that might help identify individuals at risk of developing RA.

Association of high titers of anti-carbamylated protein antibodies with decreased bone mineral density in early arthritis patients

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has a negative impact on bone that is partly mediated by anti-citrullinated proteins antibodies (ACPA). These antibodies are associated with erosions, and with juxta-articular and systemic bone loss. Other RA autoantibodies, the anti-carbamylated protein antibodies (anti-CarPA), are independently associated with erosions. However, we do not know if they are also associated with juxta-articular and systemic bone loss. Here, we have addressed this question with data from 548 early arthritis (EA) patients. Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine (LS), total hip (TH) and metacarpophalangeal joints (MCP). The 25.9% anti-CarPA positive patients did not show significant differences in BMD Z-scores with the negative patients. Nevertheless, this result was due to the similarity between negative and low-positive (below the median of the positive) patients, whereas the high-positive patients showed significant decrease of BMD at LS (β = -0.39, p = 0.01) and TH (β = -0.30, p = 0.02); but not at the juxta-articular bone of MCP. Given the overlap between anti-CarPA and ACPA, we included the two autoantibodies in an analysis that showed significantly lower BMD Z-scores at LS and TH (p< 0.01) only in the ACPA positive/anti-CarPA high-positive subgroup. However, the similar coefficients of regression between the ACPA positive/anti-CarPA high-positive and the ACPA negative/anti-CarPA high-positive subgroups (β = -0.50 vs. -0.52 at LS, and β = -0.37 vs. -0.30 at TH) suggested an independent association. Overall, these results support a contribution of anti-CarPA to systemic bone loss in EA patients.

Biomarkers in connective tissue diseases

Autoimmune connective tissue diseases are clinically variable, making biomarkers desirable for assessing future disease risk, supporting early and accurate diagnosis, monitoring disease activity and progression, selecting therapeutics, and assessing treatment response. Because of their correlations with specific clinical characteristics and often with disease progression, autoantibodies and other soluble mediators are considered potential biomarkers. Additional biomarkers might reflect downstream pathologic processes or appear because of ongoing inflammation and damage. Because of overlap between diseases, some biomarkers have limited specificity for a single autoimmune connective tissue disease. This review describes select current biomarkers that aid in the diagnosis and treatment of several major systemic autoimmune connective tissue disorders: systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitides. Newly proposed biomarkers that target various stages in disease onset or progression are also discussed. Newer approaches to overcome the diversity observed in patients with these diseases and to facilitate personalized disease monitoring and treatment are also addressed.

Value of Measuring Anti-Carbamylated Protein Antibodies for Classification on Early Arthritis Patients

Classification of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as quickly as possible improves their prognosis. This reason motivates specially dedicated early arthritis (EA) clinics. Here, we have used 1062 EA patients with two years of follow-up to explore the value of anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP) antibodies, a new type of RA specific autoantibodies, for classification. Specifically, we aimed to determine whether the addition of anti-CarP antibodies to IgM rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies, which are helpful in RA classification, improves it or not. Our analysis showed that incorporation of the anti-CarP antibodies to combinations of the other two antibodies (all joint by the OR Boolean operator) produces a modest increase in sensitivity (2.2% higher), at the cost of decreased specificity (8.1% lower). The cost-benefit ratio was more favorable in the patients lacking the other autoantibodies. However, it did not improve by considering different titer levels of the anti-CarP antibodies, or after exhaustively exploring other antibody combinations. Therefore, the place in RA classification of these antibodies is questionable in the context of current treatments and biomarkers. This conclusion does not exclude their potential value for stratifying patients in joint damage, disease activity, disability, or mortality categories.