Ligand binding modulates the structural dynamics and activity of urokinase-type plasminogen activator: A possible mechanism of plasminogen activation

The Light Chain Allosterically Enhances the Protease Activity of Murine Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator

The active form of the murine urokinase-type plasminogen activator (muPA) is formed by a 27-residue disordered light chain connecting the amino-terminal fragment (ATF) with the serine protease domain. The two chains are tethered by a disulfide bond between C1CT in the disordered light chain and C122CT in the protease domain. Previous work showed that the presence of the disordered light chain affected the inhibition of the protease domain by antibodies. Here we show that the disordered light chain induced a 3.7-fold increase in kcat of the protease domain of muPA. In addition, hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) and accelerated molecular dynamics (AMD) were performed to identify the interactions between the disordered light chain and the protease domain. HDX-MS revealed that the light chain is contacting the 110s, the turn between the β10- and β11-strand, and the β7-strand. A reduction in deuterium uptake was also observed in the activation loop, the 140s loop and the 220s loop, which forms the S1-specificty pocket where the substrate binds. These loops are further away from where the light chain seems to be interacting with the protease domain. Our results suggest that the light chain most likely increases the activity of muPA by allosterically favoring conformations in which the specificity pocket is formed. We propose a model by which the allostery would be transmitted through the β-strands of the β-barrels to the loops on the other side of the protease domain.

The autoactivation of human single-chain urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA)

Most serine proteases are synthesized as inactive zymogens that are activated by cleavage by another protease in a tightly regulated mechanism. The urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and plasmin cleave and activate each other, constituting a positive feedback loop. How this mutual activation cycle begins has remained a mystery. We used hydrogen deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to characterize the dynamic differences between the inactive single-chain uPA (scuPA) and its active form two-chain uPA (tcuPA). The results show that the C-terminal β-barrel and the area around the new N terminus have significantly reduced dynamics in tcuPA as compared with scuPA. We also show that the zymogen scuPA is inactive but can, upon storage, become active in the absence of external proteases. In addition to plasmin, the tcuPA can activate scuPA by cleavage at K158, a process called autoactivation. Unexpectedly, tcuPA can cleave at position 158 even when this site is mutated. TcuPA can also cleave scuPA after K135 or K136 in the disordered linker, which generates the soluble protease domain of uPA. Plasmin cleaves scuPA exclusively after K158 and at a faster rate than tcuPA. We propose a mechanism by which the uPA receptor dimerization could promote autoactivation of scuPA on cell surfaces. These results resolve long-standing controversies in the literature surrounding the mechanism of uPA activation.

Surface loops of trypsin-like serine proteases as determinants of function

Trypsin and chymotrypsin-like serine proteases from family S1 (clan PA) constitute the largest protease group in humans and more generally in vertebrates. The prototypes chymotrypsin, trypsin and elastase represent simple digestive proteases in the gut, where they cleave nearly any protein. Multidomain trypsin-like proteases are key players in the tightly controlled blood coagulation and complement systems, as well as related proteases that are secreted from diverse immune cells. Some serine proteases are expressed in nearly all tissues and fluids of the human body, such as the human kallikreins and kallikrein-related peptidases with specialization for often unique substrates and accurate timing of activity. HtrA and membrane-anchored serine proteases fulfill important physiological tasks with emerging roles in cancer. The high diversity of all family members, which share the tandem β-barrel architecture of the chymotrypsin-fold in the catalytic domain, is conferred by the large differences of eight surface loops, surrounding the active site. The length of these loops alters with insertions and deletions, resulting in remarkably different three-dimensional arrangements. In addition, metal binding sites for Na+, Ca2+ and Zn2+ serve as regulatory elements, as do N-glycosylation sites. Depending on the individual tasks of the protease, the surface loops determine substrate specificity, control the turnover and allow regulation of activation, activity and degradation by other proteins, which are often serine proteases themselves. Most intriguingly, in some serine proteases, the surface loops interact as allosteric network, partially tuned by protein co-factors. Knowledge of these subtle and complicated molecular motions may allow nowadays for new and specific pharmaceutical or medical approaches.

Structural Biology and Protein Engineering of Thrombolytics

Myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke are the most frequent causes of death or disability worldwide. Due to their ability to dissolve blood clots, the thrombolytics are frequently used for their treatment. Improving the effectiveness of thrombolytics for clinical uses is of great interest. The knowledge of the multiple roles of the endogenous thrombolytics and the fibrinolytic system grows continuously. The effects of thrombolytics on the alteration of the nervous system and the regulation of the cell migration offer promising novel uses for treating neurodegenerative disorders or targeting cancer metastasis. However, secondary activities of thrombolytics may lead to life-threatening side-effects such as intracranial bleeding and neurotoxicity. Here we provide a structural biology perspective on various thrombolytic enzymes and their key properties: (i) effectiveness of clot lysis, (ii) affinity and specificity towards fibrin, (iii) biological half-life, (iv) mechanisms of activation/inhibition, and (v) risks of side effects. This information needs to be carefully considered while establishing protein engineering strategies aiming at the development of novel thrombolytics. Current trends and perspectives are discussed, including the screening for novel enzymes and small molecules, the enhancement of fibrin specificity by protein engineering, the suppression of interactions with native receptors, liposomal encapsulation and targeted release, the application of adjuvants, and the development of improved production systems.