Impact of acute-phase complications and interventions on 6-month survival after stroke. A prospective observational study

Systematic Literature Review of the Association of Fever and Elevated Temperature with Outcomes in Critically Ill Adult Patients

Although most commonly associated with infection, elevated temperature and fever also occur in a variety of critically ill populations. Prior studies have suggested that fever and elevated temperature may be detrimental to critically ill patients and can lead to poor outcomes, but the evidence surrounding the association of fever with outcomes is rapidly evolving. To broadly assess potential associations of elevated temperature and fever with outcomes in critically ill adult patients, we performed a systematic literature review focusing on traumatic brain injury, stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic), cardiac arrest, sepsis, and general intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Searches were conducted in Embase® and PubMed® from 2016 to 2021, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, including dual-screening of abstracts, full texts, and extracted data. In total, 60 studies assessing traumatic brain injury and stroke (24), cardiac arrest (8), sepsis (22), and general ICU (6) patients were included. Mortality, functional, or neurological status and length of stay were the most frequently reported outcomes. Elevated temperature and fever were associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury, stroke, and cardiac arrest but not in patients with sepsis. Although a causal relationship between elevated temperature and poor outcomes cannot be definitively established, the association observed in this systematic literature review supports the concept that management of elevated temperature may factor in avoidance of detrimental outcomes in multiple critically ill populations. The analysis also highlights gaps in our understanding of fever and elevated temperature in critically ill adult patients.

Which items of the modified Barthel Index can predict functional independence at discharge from inpatient rehabilitation? A secondary analysis retrospective cohort study

The modified Barthel Index (mBI) is a well-established patient-centered outcome measure commonly administrated in rehabilitation settings to evaluate the functional status of patients at admission and discharge. This study aimed to detect which mBI items collected on admission can predict the total mBI at discharge from first inpatient rehabilitation in large cohorts of orthopedic (n = 1864) and neurological (n = 1684) patients. Demographic and clinical data (time since the acute event 11.8 ± 17.2 days) at patients' admission and mBI at discharge were collected. Univariate and multiple binary logistic regressions were performed to study the associations between independent and dependent variables for each cohort separately. In neurological patients, the shorter time between the acute event and rehabilitation admission, shorter length of stay, and being independent with feeding, personal hygiene, bladder, and transfers were independently associated with higher total mBI at discharge (R 2  = 0.636). In orthopedic patients, age, the shorter time between the acute event and rehabilitation admission, shorter length of stay, and being independent with personal hygiene, dressing, and bladder were independently associated with higher total mBI at discharge (R 2  = 0.622). Our results showed that different activities in neurological (i.e. feeding, personal hygiene, bladder, and transfer) and orthopedic sample (i.e. personal hygiene, dressing, and bladder) are positively associated with better function (measured by mBI) at the discharge. Clinicians have to take into account these predictors of functionality when they plan an appropriate rehabilitation treatment.

Model Analysis and Experimental Study of Lower Limb Rehabilitation Training Device Based on Gravity Balance

More hemiplegia patients tend to use equipment for rehabilitation training due to the lack of physical therapists and the low effect of manual training. Nowadays, lower limb rehabilitation training devices for patients in grade 2 of the Medical Research Council (MRC-2) scale are still scarce and have some issues of poor autonomy and cannot relieve the muscle weakness of patients. To address these problems, a prototype based on gravity balance was designed with the combination of springs and linkages to enable patients to passively experience the rehabilitation training in the state of balancing the gravity of lower limbs. The motion of the mechanism was analyzed to obtain the functional relation between the motor rotation angle and the joints’ angle. Based on the principle of constant potential energy, a gravity balance mathematical model of the device was established, analyzed, and simulated. Moreover, through the training experiment, the results show that when subjects in three different weights were trained under the rehabilitation device with and without gravity balance, the required torques of the motor and EMG signal strength of the knee and hip joints decreased by a degree of significance, which verified the effectiveness of the device’s gravity balancing characteristics for MRC-2 patients.

Redefining a minimal assessment protocol for stroke rehabilitation: the new "Protocollo di Minima per l'ICtus" - PMIC2020

BACKGROUND

The use of standardized assessment protocols is strongly recommended to identify patient's needs, outcomes, and predictors of response to specific interventions in Stroke rehabilitation. In 2008, the Italian Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (SIMFER) published the minimal protocol for the person with stroke (PMIC), in reference to the International classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.

AIM

In 2019, the SIMFER appointed a working group (WG) to provide a revised, updated version in line with the most recent literature and suitable for all rehabilitation settings: the PMIC2020.

DESIGN

descriptive study based on the consensus of a panel of experts.

SETTING

all the rehabilitation settings.

POPULATION

stroke survivor people with disability.

METHODS

the coordinator of the SIMFER national Stroke Section appointed the WG, including the 8 Stroke Section board members, and 4 more experts (3 physiatrists; 1 neurologist). An extensive revision of the international literature on stroke assessment recommendations was performed; each proposed change from PMIC was written and motivated, discussed and voted.

RESULTS

The PMIC2020 is a single form, to be administered at any time of the rehabilitation pathway, including a minimum set of variables, consisting of a demographic/anamnestic section, and a clinical/functional assessment section. Newly introduced tools included measures of malnutrition (BMI<18,5); pain in verbal and non-verbal patients (Numeric Rating Scale-pain, Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia Scale); neurological impairment (National Institute of Health-stroke scale); activity (Modified Barthel Index, Short Physical Performance Battery); and participation (Frenchay Activity Index).

CONCLUSIONS

The PMIC2020 provides an updated tool for the multidimensional rehabilitation assessment of the stroke patient, at any stage of the rehabilitation pathway; it aims to provide a shared minimum set of variables defining patient's needs and outcomes across different rehabilitation facilities and settings.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

The PMIC2020 identifies patient's needs, outcomes, and predictors of response to specific interventions in Stroke rehabilitation and provide ground for a highly needed Stroke Registry.

The association of diabetes and hyperglycemia with sepsis outcomes: a population-based cohort analysis

The independent association of diabetes and hyperglycemia on the outcomes of sepsis remains unclear. We conducted retrospective cohort analyses of outcomes among patients with community-onset sepsis admitted to Shamir Medical Center, Israel (08-12/2016). Statistical associations were queried by Cox and logistic regressions, controlled for by matched propensity score analyses. Among 1527 patients with community-onset sepsis, 469 (30.7%) were diabetic. Diabetic patients were significantly older, with advanced complexity of comorbidities, and were more often exposed to healthcare environments. Despite statistically significant univariable associations with in-hospital and 90-day mortality, the adjusted Hazard Ratios (aHR) were 1.21 95% CI 0.8-1.71, p = 0.29 and 1.13 95% CI 0.86-1.49, p = 0.37, respectively. However, hyperglycemia at admission (i.e., above 200 mg/dl (was independently associated with: increased in-hospital mortality, aHR 1.48 95% CI 1.02-2.16, p = 0.037, 30-day mortality, aHR 1.8 95% CI 1.12-2.58, p = 0.001), and 90-day mortality, aHR 1.68 95% CI 1.24-2.27, p = 0.001. This association was more robust among diabetic patients than those without diabetes. In this study, diabetes was not associated with worse clinical outcomes in community-onset sepsis. However, high glucose levels at sepsis onset are independently associated with a worse prognosis, particularly among diabetic patients. Future trials should explore whether glycemic control could impact the outcomes and should be part of the management of sepsis, among the general adult septic population.

Survival of Stroke Patients According to Hypertension Status in Northern Ethiopia: Seven Years Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

Globally, stroke appears as a major cause of preventable deaths and disabilities. In Ethiopia, the intra-hospital mortality of stroke is significant; however, epidemiologic data are scarce whether there is a difference in the overall survival time between hypertensive and non-hypertensive adult stroke patients admitted in specialized hospitals. This study was intended to determine the survival of stroke patients according to their hypertension status admitted in Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northern Ethiopia from March 1, 2012, to February 28, 2019.

Methods and Findings

A hospital-based retrospective cohort study was conducted among all cohorts of confirmed first-ever stroke patients admitted in Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northern Ethiopia. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was applied to estimate the survival probability of hypertensive and non-hypertensive first-ever stroke patients. Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to determine the adjusted hazard ratio of death for each main baseline predictor variable with 95% CI, and P-value <0.05 was used to declare statistical significance. The assumptions of the Cox proportional hazards regression model assessed by the global test, Schoenfeld residuals. There were 503 (323 were hypertensive, 180 Non-hypertensive) confirmed first, ever adult stroke patients, the overall median age of the patients was 65 years, IQR (53–75) years. Seventy-five (14.9%) of them were dead, with a median survival time of 48 days and 428 (85.1%) of them were censored. At any particular point in time, the hazard of death among hypertensive patients was two times higher than non-hypertensive patients, but this was not found to be a statistically significant (adjusted HR=2.13: 95% CI 0.66–6.81). Glasgow Coma Scale 3–8 at admission (adjusted HR=10.12; 95% CI 2.58–40.68), presence of stroke complications (adjusted HR=7.23; 95% CI 1.86–28.26) and borderline high total cholesterol level (adjusted HR=3.57; 95% CI 1.15–11.1) were the only independent predictors of intra-hospital patient mortality.

Conclusion

The overall survival time difference between hypertensive and non-hypertensive first-ever adult stroke patients was not statistically significant. Early identification and treatment of stroke complications, co-morbidities along strict follow-up of comatose patients may improve the intra-hospital survival of stroke patients, and we also recommend community-based studies using a large sample size.

Dysphagia and disability in minor strokes - An institutional study

BACKGROUND

Minor strokes, defined as NIHSS ≤5 are considered non-disabling, associated with a favourable outcome.

AIM

Our aim was to study prevalence and predictors of dysphagia in patients with minor stroke and its impact on functional outcome.

METHODS

Single centre retrospective study of all minor strokes admitted to Comprehensive Stroke care centre with 1 year completed follow-up were recruited. Clinical and imaging details and follow-up data were extracted from medical records.

RESULTS

We had 147 patients with minor stroke, 72.1% men with median age 61 years. 71% presented within 24 h of symptom onset. Most common etiology was lacunar .Median NIHSS at admission was 3(IQR 2). 85 patients had anterior circulation strokes and 34 had chronic infarcts in imaging.19 had significant dysphagia and 10 were discharged with nasogastric feeding tube. Admission NIHSS and white mater changes in imaging were predictive of post stroke dysphagia. Excellent recovery of dysphagia was found within 1 month post stroke in all, except one who required percutaneous gastrostomy. At 3 months 76% had excellent outcome. Presence of dysphagia and diabetes were found to be predictive of short term outcome, independent of admission stroke severity. At 12 months, post stroke dysphagia, female gender and white mater changes in imaging were predictive of unfavourable outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Minor strokes are disabling in a small fraction of patients. Over 10% of them can have significant post stroke dysphagia necessitating nasogastric feeding short term. This patient subgroup tend to have less favourable outcome on short and long term follow-up.

Long-term survival after stroke in Lithuania: Data from Kaunas population-based stroke registry

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of reliable epidemiological data on long-term survival trends of first-ever stroke patients in Lithuanian population.

AIMS

To evaluate trends in long-term survival after stroke and to determine the influence of some sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, time and subtype of stroke, and stroke care on survival.

METHODS

All stroke events included in Kaunas stroke register database were ascertained and validated according to the standardized criteria outlined by the WHO MONICA Project. The study included all patients in Kaunas (Lithuania) city aged 25 to 64 years who experienced a stroke between 1986 and 2011. Death time was confirmed by the Office for National Death Statistics. Estimates of stroke long-term survival data and factors influencing survival changes were made by applying the Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

During the study period, 4,129 persons aged 25-64 years suffered from a first-ever stroke: 2,215 (53.6%) of them were men and 1,914 (46.4%)-women. Ischemic stroke was significantly more frequent in males than in females (80.6% and 78.6%, respectively, p<0.05) and subarachnoid hemorrhage was more common in women than in men (9.0% and 7.0% respectively, p <0.05). Of all first-ever stroke patients, 3,272 (79.2%) survived 1 year and 2,905 (70.4%) survived 5 years after stroke onset. The 1- and 5-years survival rate after a first-ever stroke in women was significantly higher as compared with that in men (Log-rank test p = 0.0001). The older (55-64 year) persons had poorer 1-year and 5-years survival rate as compared with persons in the younger (25-54 years) age group (Log-rank test p = 0.0001). Among persons with a first-ever stroke who had their stroke in 2007-2011, 1- and 5-year survival rate was higher compared with that in persons who had had a stroke in 1986-1990 and in 1997-2001 (Log-rank test p = 0.0001). The persons with a first-ever ischemic stroke had a better chance to survive first 1- and 5-years after stroke compared with persons who had intracerebral or subarachnoid haemorrhage. Only female gender was associated with higher 1- and 5-year survival rate after first-ever stroke. The older age, previous myocardial infarction and diabetes mellitus were associated with lower 1- and 5-year survival rate after first-ever stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

This population-based study of patients with first-ever stroke demonstrated that the long-term survival was better in women than men, and improved significantly in both men and women during the past decade. Long-term survival was better of those with first-ever ischemic stroke and of younger age- 25 to 54 years.