1
|
Raissi-Dehkordi N, Raissi-Dehkordi N, Hajikarimloo B, Khakpai F, Zarrindast MR. Potentiation of Imipramine-Induced Anti-hyperalgesic and Anti-Nociceptive Effects by Citicoline in the Sciatic Nerve Ligated Mice. ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE 2024; 27:456-464. [PMID: 39306718 PMCID: PMC11416695 DOI: 10.34172/aim.28772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peripheral neuropathic pain is a result of damage/illness of the peripheral nerves. The mechanisms caused by its pathophysiology are not completely understood. METHODS Imipramine is a tricyclic antidepressant that is sometimes used to treat neuropathic pain. Moreover, citicoline is considered a novel adjuvant for painful disorders such as neuropathic pain. So, a possible interaction between imipramine and citicoline on pain behavior was examined in nerve-ligated mice using tail-flick and hot plate tests. RESULTS The results indicated that induction of neuropathic pain by sciatic nerve ligation caused hyperalgesia in nerve-ligated mice. On the other hand, intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of citicoline (50, 75, and 100 mg/kg), and imipramine (2.5 and 5 mg/kg) induced anti-hyperalgesic and anti-nociceptive effects in nerve-ligated mice. Furthermore, citicoline potentiated the anti-hyperalgesic and anti-nociceptive effects of imipramine when they were co-administrated in nerve-ligated mice. Interestingly, there was an additive effect between imipramine and citicoline upon induction of anti-hyperalgesic and anti-nociceptive effects in nerve-ligated mice. CONCLUSION Therefore, it can be concluded that citicoline (as an adjuvant substance) enhanced the efficacy of imipramine for the modulation of pain behavior in nerve-ligated mice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Bardia Hajikarimloo
- School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Khakpai
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
- Cognitive and Neuroscience Research Center (CNRC), Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Moammad-Reza Zarrindast
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Institute for Cognitive Science Studies (ICSS), Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Curatolo M, Chiu AP, Chia C, Ward A, Johnston SK, Klein RM, Henze DA, Zhu W, Raftery D. Multi-Omics Profiles of Chronic Low Back Pain and Fibromyalgia - Study Protocol. RESEARCH SQUARE 2024:rs.3.rs-4669838. [PMID: 39149502 PMCID: PMC11326421 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4669838/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/17/2024]
Abstract
Background Chronic low back pain (CLBP) and fibromyalgia (FM) are leading causes of suffering, disability, and social costs. Current pharmacological treatments do not target molecular mechanisms driving CLBP and FM, and no validated biomarkers are available, hampering the development of effective therapeutics. Omics research has the potential to substantially advance our ability to develop mechanism-specific therapeutics by identifying pathways involved in the pathophysiology of CLBP and FM, and facilitate the development of diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic biomarkers. We will conduct a blood and urine multi-omics study in comprehensively phenotyped and clinically characterized patients with CLBP and FM. Our aims are to identify molecular pathways potentially involved in the pathophysiology of CLBP and FM that would shift the focus of research to the development of target-specific therapeutics, and identify candidate diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic biomarkers. Methods We are conducting a prospective cohort study of adults ≥18 years of age with CLBP (n=100) and FM (n=100), and pain-free controls (n=200). Phenotyping measures include demographics, medication use, pain-related clinical characteristics, physical function, neuropathiccomponents (quantitative sensory tests and DN4 questionnaire), pain facilitation (temporal summation), and psychosocial function as moderator. Blood and urine samples are collected to analyze metabolomics, lipidomics and proteomics. We will integrate the overall omics data to identify common mechanisms and pathways, and associate multi-omics profiles to pain-related clinical characteristics, physical function, indicators of neuropathic pain, and pain facilitation, with psychosocial variables as moderators. Discussion Our study addresses the need for a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying chronic low back pain and fibromyalgia. Using a multi-omics approach, we hope to identify converging evidence for potential targets of future therapeutic developments, as well as promising candidate biomarkers for further investigation by biomarker validation studies. We believe that accurate patient phenotyping will be essential for the discovery process, as both conditions are characterized by high heterogeneity and complexity, likely rendering molecular mechanisms phenotype specific.
Collapse
|
3
|
Baroncini A, Maffulli N, Mian M, Vaishya R, Simeone F, Migliorini F. Predictors of success of pharmacological management in patients with chronic lower back pain: systematic review. J Orthop Surg Res 2024; 19:248. [PMID: 38637804 PMCID: PMC11025267 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04741-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conservative management is recommended as the first therapeutic step in chronic low back pain (LBP), but there is no available evidence regarding the possible effect of patients' baseline characteristics on the therapeutic outcomes. A systematic review of the literature was performed to investigate this point. METHODS In February 2024, all the level I studies investigating the role of pharmacological management for chronic LBP were accessed. Data concerning the patient demographic at baseline were collected: number of patients and related mean BMI and age, duration of the symptoms, duration of the follow-up, percentage of females, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMQ), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The outcomes at the last follow-up were evaluated through NRS, RMQ, and ODI. A multiple linear model regression diagnostic through the Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient (r) was used. RESULTS Data from 47 articles (9007 patients) were obtained. The analysis yielded the following significant associations: age at baseline and NRS at follow-up (r = - 0.22; P = 0.04), NRS at baseline with NRS (r = 0.26; P = 0.03) and RMQ (r = - 0.58; P = 0.02) at follow-up, RMQ at baseline and the same at follow-up (r = 0.69; P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION Older age, higher BMI, presence of comorbidities, higher ODI and a long history of symptoms or surgical treatments do not reduce the efficacy of pharmacological management of chronic LBP. However, pharmacological therapy is not an effective option for patients with high baseline RMQ. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I systematic review of RCTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Baroncini
- GSpine4, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Maffulli
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, University La Sapienza, 00185, Rome, Italy
- Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Hospital, London, E1 4DG, England
- School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University Faculty of Medicine, Thornburrow Drive, Stoke on Trent, England
| | - Michael Mian
- Innovation Research Teaching Service (IRTS), Academic Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University, 39100, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Raju Vaishya
- Department of Orthopaedics and Joint Replacement Surgery, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi, 110076, India
| | - Francesco Simeone
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Academic Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University, 39100, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Academic Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University, 39100, Bolzano, Italy.
- Department of Orthopaedic, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ma T, Qi H, Mao Y, Wang Y, Duan B, Ma K. Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Antidepressants for Patients with Chronic Back Pain: A Network Meta-Analysis. J Clin Pharmacol 2024; 64:205-214. [PMID: 37794650 DOI: 10.1002/jcph.2365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 09/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
Various antidepressants have introduced in clinical practice for pain management, but it is important to understand how to properly use them. We therefore performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare and rank the efficacy and safety of antidepressants for patients with chronic back pain. We identified eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the efficacy and safety of antidepressants for chronic back pain from PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov, searching from inception to May 2023. Six categories of antidepressants for the treatment of chronic back pain were included, and the surface under the cumulative ranking probabilities was applied to rank the treatment strategies. Overall, we selected 19 RCTs recruiting 2903 patients for the meta-analysis. Tricyclic antidepressants presented the best relative effects for relief in pain score (surface under the cumulative ranking, 84.4%). The results of pairwise comparison analyses found the use of serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) significantly reduced pain score and low disability score compared with placebo, irrespective of treatment duration. Noradrenaline-dopamine reuptake inhibitors (relative risk [RR], 2.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-6.03; P = .008) and SNRIs (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.07-1.27; P < .001) significantly increased the risk of adverse events. SNRIs were associated with an increased risk of withdrawal due to adverse events (RR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.64-3.43; P < .001). This study found that antidepressants are more efficacious than placebos for treating chronic back pain, and tricyclic antidepressants are the most likely medications that lead to pain relief.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Ma
- Department of Algology, Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital, Xining, China
| | - Hongyu Qi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital, Xining, China
| | - Yuanrong Mao
- Department of Algology, Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital, Xining, China
| | - Ya Wang
- Department of Algology, Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital, Xining, China
| | - Baolin Duan
- Department of Algology, Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital, Xining, China
| | - Ke Ma
- Department of Algology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Migliorini F, Vaishya R, Pappalardo G, Schneider M, Bell A, Maffulli N. Between guidelines and clinical trials: evidence-based advice on the pharmacological management of non-specific chronic low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023; 24:432. [PMID: 37254090 PMCID: PMC10228138 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06537-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The pharmacological management of nonspecific chronic low back pain (NCLBP) aims to restore patients' daily activities and improve their quality of life. The management of NCLBP is not well codified and extremely heterogeneous, and residual symptoms are common. Pharmacological management should be considered as co-adjuvant to non-pharmacological therapy, and should be guided by the symptoms reported by the patients. Depending on the individual severity of NCLPB, pharmacological management may range from nonopioid to opioid analgesics. It is important to identify patients with generalized sensory hypersensitivity, who may benefit from dedicated therapy. This article provides an evidence-based overview of the principles of pharmacological management of NCLPB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Orthopaedic, Trauma, and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH University Hospital of Aachen, 52064 Aachen, Germany
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Academic Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Bolzano, 39100 Italy
| | - Raju Vaishya
- Department of Orthopedics, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals Institutes of Orthopaedics, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Marco Schneider
- Department of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Witten/Herdecke, 58455 Witten, Germany
- Department of Arthroscopy and Joint Replacement, MVZ Praxisklinik Orthopädie Aachen, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Andreas Bell
- Department of Orthopedics, Eifelklinik St. Brigida, Simmerath, Germany
| | - Nicola Maffulli
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Baronissi, 84081 Italy
- Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Hospital, London, E1 4DG England
- School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Stoke on Trent, Keele University Faculty of Medicine, Keele, England
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pharmacogenetics and Pain Treatment with a Focus on Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) and Antidepressants: A Systematic Review. Pharmaceutics 2022; 14:pharmaceutics14061190. [PMID: 35745763 PMCID: PMC9228102 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14061190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: This systematic review summarizes the impact of pharmacogenetics on the effect and safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and antidepressants when used for pain treatment. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines regarding the human in vivo efficacy and safety of NSAIDs and antidepressants in pain treatment that take pharmacogenetic parameters into consideration. Studies were collected from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to the cutoff date 18 October 2021. Results: Twenty-five articles out of the 6547 initially detected publications were identified. Relevant medication–gene interactions were noted for drug safety. Interactions important for pain management were detected for (1) ibuprofen/CYP2C9; (2) celecoxib/CYP2C9; (3) piroxicam/CYP2C8, CYP2C9; (4) diclofenac/CYP2C9, UGT2B7, CYP2C8, ABCC2; (5) meloxicam/CYP2C9; (6) aspirin/CYP2C9, SLCO1B1, and CHST2; (7) amitriptyline/CYP2D6 and CYP2C19; (8) imipramine/CYP2C19; (9) nortriptyline/CYP2C19, CYP2D6, ABCB1; and (10) escitalopram/HTR2C, CYP2C19, and CYP1A2. Conclusions: Overall, a lack of well powered human in vivo studies assessing the pharmacogenetics in pain patients treated with NSAIDs or antidepressants is noted. Studies indicate a higher risk for partly severe side effects for the CYP2C9 poor metabolizers and NSAIDs. Further in vivo studies are needed to consolidate the relevant polymorphisms in NSAID safety as well as in the efficacy of NSAIDs and antidepressants in pain management.
Collapse
|
7
|
Jovanovic F, Pirvulescu I, Knezevic E, Candido KD, Knezevic NN. Comparative safety review of current treatment options for chronic low back pain and unmet needs: a narrative review. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2021; 20:1005-1033. [PMID: 33945371 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1921142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: The healthcare expenditures in the United States are substantial for the management of refractory, chronic low back pain (CLBP). The objective of this review is to summarize and evaluate the safety profiles of different pharmacological treatment options used in the management of CLBP.Areas covered: The authors conducted a search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the safety profiles of different pharmacological agents used in the management of CLBP. This narrative review covered corticosteroids, opioids, antidepressants, gabapentinoids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, muscle relaxants, anti-nerve growth factor antibodies and topical agents, as monotherapy or in combination.Expert opinion: The risk-benefit ratio of a particular treatment is a subject driving the ongoing development of pharmaceuticals. The most commonly reported AEs across all drug classes are of gastrointestinal nature, followed by neurological and skin-related. These AEs include nausea, dizziness, constipation, arthralgia, headache, dry mouth, pruritus, etc. The majority of the AEs reported are not life-threatening, although they may lower patients' quality of life, thus, affecting their compliance. One of the biggest limitations of our review stems from the paucity of safety assessments in published RCTs. Advances in our understanding of the neurobiology of pain will promote development of new therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filip Jovanovic
- Department of Anesthesiology, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Iulia Pirvulescu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Emilija Knezevic
- College of Liberal Arts & Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, IL, United States
| | - Kenneth D Candido
- Department of Anesthesiology, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States.,Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, United States.,Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Nebojsa Nick Knezevic
- Department of Anesthesiology, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States.,Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, United States.,Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Suryanto ME, Audira G, Uapipatanakul B, Hussain A, Saputra F, Siregar P, Chen KHC, Hsiao CD. Antidepressant Screening Demonstrated Non-Monotonic Responses to Amitriptyline, Amoxapine and Sertraline in Locomotor Activity Assay in Larval Zebrafish. Cells 2021; 10:cells10040738. [PMID: 33810553 PMCID: PMC8066259 DOI: 10.3390/cells10040738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2021] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Antidepressants are well-known drugs to treat depression and major depressive disorder for humans. However, the misuse and abuse of antidepressants keep increasing with several side effects reported. The aim of this study was to assess the potential adverse effects of 18 antidepressants by monitoring zebrafish larval locomotor activity performance based on the total distance traveled, burst movement count, and total rotation count at four dark-light intercalated phases. In general, zebrafish larvae displayed sedative effects after antidepressant exposure by showing a significant reduction in all of the locomotor activity-related endpoints. However, three antidepressants i.e., amitriptyline, amoxapine, and sertraline were able to trigger a significantly high locomotor activity in zebrafish larvae during the light cycle. These differences might be due to the pharmacologic differences among the antidepressants. In addition, since each antidepressant possesses a different dosage range from the other, overdoses of these antidepressants might also be the causes of these differences. Furthermore, based on these results, a further study was conducted to observe the effect of these three antidepressants in lower concentrations. From the results, biphasic effects in terms of zebrafish larval locomotor activity were demonstrated by these drugs. Even though further studies are still required to validate the mechanism, these findings indicate that these antidepressants might share a common mechanism responsible for their effects on zebrafish larval locomotor activity although there were some differences in potency of these effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Edbert Suryanto
- Department of Bioscience Technology, Chung Yuan Christian University, Chung-Li 320314, Taiwan; (M.E.S.); (G.A.); (A.H.); (F.S.); (P.S.)
| | - Gilbert Audira
- Department of Bioscience Technology, Chung Yuan Christian University, Chung-Li 320314, Taiwan; (M.E.S.); (G.A.); (A.H.); (F.S.); (P.S.)
- Department of Chemistry, Chung Yuan Christian University, Chung-Li 320314, Taiwan
| | - Boontida Uapipatanakul
- Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi, Thanyaburi 12110, Thailand;
| | - Akhlaq Hussain
- Department of Bioscience Technology, Chung Yuan Christian University, Chung-Li 320314, Taiwan; (M.E.S.); (G.A.); (A.H.); (F.S.); (P.S.)
| | - Ferry Saputra
- Department of Bioscience Technology, Chung Yuan Christian University, Chung-Li 320314, Taiwan; (M.E.S.); (G.A.); (A.H.); (F.S.); (P.S.)
| | - Petrus Siregar
- Department of Bioscience Technology, Chung Yuan Christian University, Chung-Li 320314, Taiwan; (M.E.S.); (G.A.); (A.H.); (F.S.); (P.S.)
| | - Kelvin H.-C. Chen
- Department of Applied Chemistry, National Pingtung University, Pingtung 900391, Taiwan
- Correspondence: (K.H.-C.C.); (C.-D.H.)
| | - Chung-Der Hsiao
- Department of Bioscience Technology, Chung Yuan Christian University, Chung-Li 320314, Taiwan; (M.E.S.); (G.A.); (A.H.); (F.S.); (P.S.)
- Department of Chemistry, Chung Yuan Christian University, Chung-Li 320314, Taiwan
- Center for Nanotechnology, Chung Yuan Christian University, Chung-Li 320314, Taiwan
- Correspondence: (K.H.-C.C.); (C.-D.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Migliorini F, Maffulli N, Baroncini A, Eschweiler J, Tingart M, Quack V. Opioids for chronic low back pain management: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2021; 14:635-641. [PMID: 33706636 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2021.1903316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic low back pain (LBP) is common, and some patients require opiates therapy. This Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) analyzed available randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on the use of opioids for LBP.Methods: All RCTs comparing two or more opioids for chronic LBP and reporting results under the Numeric Rating Scale were included. The following drugs were analyzed: fentanyl, morphine, tapentadol, oxycodone, buprenorphine, oxymorphone, tramadol. The NMA was performed through the STATA routine for Bayesian hierarchical random-effects model analysis, with standardized mean difference (SMD) effect measure. Data regarding the rate of adverse events and different drug formulations were also reported.Results: Data from 2933 patients were obtained, with a mean age of 53.30 ± 6.95 years. The mean duration of symptoms prior to beginning the trial was 95.16 ± 47.29 months. The mean follow-up was 3.29 ± 1.72 months. Among the analyzed compounds, oxymorphone, tapentadol and fentanyl showed the highest efficacy in terms of pain reduction.Conclusion: According to published level I evidence, oxymorphone, tapentadol and fentanyl were the most effective drugs in the treatment of chronic LBP. However, different formulation and pharmacokinetic characteristics need to be taken into consideration when choosing the ideal compound for a given patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Clinic Aachen, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Aachen, Germany
| | - Nicola Maffulli
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, via S. Allende, Baronissi (SA), Italy.,School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University School of Medicine, Stoke on Trent, UK.,Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Mile End Hospital, London, UK
| | - Alice Baroncini
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Clinic Aachen, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Aachen, Germany
| | - Jörg Eschweiler
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Clinic Aachen, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Aachen, Germany
| | - Markus Tingart
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Clinic Aachen, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Aachen, Germany
| | - Valentin Quack
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Clinic Aachen, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ferraro MC, Bagg MK, Wewege MA, Cashin AG, Leake HB, Rizzo RRN, Jones MD, Gustin SM, Day R, Loo CK, McAuley JH. Efficacy, acceptability, and safety of antidepressants for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev 2021; 10:62. [PMID: 33627178 PMCID: PMC7905649 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-021-01599-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antidepressant medicines are used to manage symptoms of low back pain. The efficacy, acceptability, and safety of antidepressant medicines for low back pain (LBP) are not clear. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy, acceptability, and safety of antidepressant medicines for LBP. METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov , the EU Clinical Trials Register, and the WHO International Clinical Trial Registry Platform from inception to May 2020. We included published and trial registry reports of RCTs that allocated adult participants with LBP to receive an antidepressant medicine or a placebo medicine. Pairs of authors independently extracted data in duplicate. We extracted participant characteristics, study sample size, outcome values, and measures of variance for each outcome. We data using random-effects meta-analysis models and calculated estimates of effects and heterogeneity for each outcome. We formed judgments of confidence in the evidence in accordance with GRADE. We report our findings in accordance with the PRISMA statement. We prespecified all outcomes in a prospectively registered protocol. The primary outcomes were pain intensity and acceptability. We measured pain intensity at end-of-treatment on a 0-100 point scale and considered 10 points the minimal clinically important difference. We defined acceptability as the odds of stopping treatment for any reason. RESULTS We included 23 RCTs in this review. Data were available for pain in 17 trials and acceptability in 14 trials. Treatment with antidepressants decreased pain intensity by 4.33 points (95% CI - 6.15 to - 2.50) on a 0-100 scale, compared to placebo. Treatment with antidepressants increased the odds of stopping treatment for any reason (OR 1.27 [95% CI 1.03 to 1.56]), compared to placebo. CONCLUSIONS Treatment of LBP with antidepressants is associated with small reductions in pain intensity and increased odds of stopping treatment for any reason, compared to placebo. The effect on pain is not clinically important. The effect on acceptability warrants consideration. These findings provide Level I evidence to guide clinicians in their use of antidepressants to treat LBP. TRIAL REGISTRATION We prospectively registered the protocol for this systematic review on PROSPERO ( CRD42020149275 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C. Ferraro
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW Australia
- School of Health Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Matthew K. Bagg
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- New College Village, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Michael A. Wewege
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW Australia
- School of Health Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Aidan G. Cashin
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Hayley B. Leake
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW Australia
- IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Rodrigo R. N. Rizzo
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW Australia
- School of Health Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Matthew D. Jones
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW Australia
- School of Health Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sylvia M. Gustin
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW Australia
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Richard Day
- Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- St. Vincent’s Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Colleen K. Loo
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia
| | - James H. McAuley
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW Australia
- School of Health Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ferreira GE, McLachlan AJ, Lin CWC, Zadro JR, Abdel-Shaheed C, O'Keeffe M, Maher CG. Efficacy and safety of antidepressants for the treatment of back pain and osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2021; 372:m4825. [PMID: 33472813 PMCID: PMC8489297 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m4825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the efficacy and safety of antidepressants for back and osteoarthritis pain compared with placebo. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception to 15 November and updated on 12 May 2020. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION Randomised controlled trials comparing the efficacy or safety, or both of any antidepressant drug with placebo (active or inert) in participants with low back or neck pain, sciatica, or hip or knee osteoarthritis. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two independent reviewers extracted data. Pain and disability were primary outcomes. Pain and disability scores were converted to a scale of 0 (no pain or disability) to 100 (worst pain or disability). A random effects model was used to calculate weighted mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. Safety (any adverse event, serious adverse events, and proportion of participants who withdrew from trials owing to adverse events) was a secondary outcome. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration's tool and certainty of evidence with the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) framework. RESULTS 33 trials (5318 participants) were included. Moderate certainty evidence showed that serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) reduced back pain (mean difference -5.30, 95% confidence interval -7.31 to -3.30) at 3-13 weeks and low certainty evidence that SNRIs reduced osteoarthritis pain (-9.72, -12.75 to -6.69) at 3-13 weeks. Very low certainty evidence showed that SNRIs reduced sciatica at two weeks or less (-18.60, -31.87 to -5.33) but not at 3-13 weeks (-17.50, -42.90 to 7.89). Low to very low certainty evidence showed that tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) did not reduce sciatica at two weeks or less (-7.55, -18.25 to 3.15) but did at 3-13 weeks (-15.95, -31.52 to -0.39) and 3-12 months (-27.0, -36.11 to -17.89). Moderate certainty evidence showed that SNRIs reduced disability from back pain at 3-13 weeks (-3.55, -5.22 to -1.88) and disability due to osteoarthritis at two weeks or less (-5.10, -7.31 to -2.89), with low certainty evidence at 3-13 weeks (-6.07, -8.13 to -4.02). TCAs and other antidepressants did not reduce pain or disability from back pain. CONCLUSION Moderate certainty evidence shows that the effect of SNRIs on pain and disability scores is small and not clinically important for back pain, but a clinically important effect cannot be excluded for osteoarthritis. TCAs and SNRIs might be effective for sciatica, but the certainty of evidence ranged from low to very low. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42020158521.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni E Ferreira
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Andrew J McLachlan
- Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia
| | - Chung-Wei Christine Lin
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Christina Abdel-Shaheed
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mary O'Keeffe
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney, Australia
- School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Republic of Ireland
| | - Chris G Maher
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Migliorini F, Maffulli N, Eschweiler J, Betsch M, Catalano G, Driessen A, Tingart M, Baroncini A. The pharmacological management of chronic lower back pain. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2020; 22:109-119. [PMID: 32885995 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1817384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Treating chronic low back pain (LBP) can be challenging, and the most effective pharmacological therapy is controversial. The present systematic review investigated the efficacy of various pharmacological compounds to achieve pain relief and improve disability in chronic LBP patients. The present study focused on acetaminophen, amoxicillin, flupirtine, baclofen, tryciclic antidepressants (TCAs), duloxetine, topiramate, gabapentinoids, non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids. AREAS COVERED All randomized clinical trials comparing two or more drug treatments for chronic low back pain were accessed. Studies reporting outcomes concerning patients with neurologic or mechanic, specific or aspecific low back pain with or without radiculopathy were included. LBP was considered chronic if pain had lasted more than 6 weeks. Data from 47 articles (9007 patients: mean age: 52.62 ± 7.0 years; mean BMI: 28.26 ± 2.8; mean follow-up: 3.23 ± 3.2 months) were obtained. EXPERT OPINION According to published level I evidence, only baclofen, duloxetine, NSAIDs, and opiates showed to improve pain and disability levels in patients with LBP. However, the patients' demographics are heterogeneous, and the results must be interpreted with caution and in the light of possible adverse events connected to the use of these drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Clinic Aachen, RWTH Aachen University Clinic , Aachen, Germany
| | - Nicola Maffulli
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno , Allende, Baronissi (SA), Italy.,School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University School of Medicine , Thornburrow Drive, Stoke on Trent, UK.,Queen Mary University of London, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine , London, UK
| | - Jörg Eschweiler
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Clinic Aachen, RWTH Aachen University Clinic , Aachen, Germany
| | - Marcel Betsch
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Clinic Aachen, RWTH Aachen University Clinic , Aachen, Germany.,University of Toronto Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Program (UTOSM), Women´s College Hospital , Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Giovanni Catalano
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Clinic Aachen, RWTH Aachen University Clinic , Aachen, Germany
| | - Arne Driessen
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Clinic Aachen, RWTH Aachen University Clinic , Aachen, Germany
| | - Markus Tingart
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Clinic Aachen, RWTH Aachen University Clinic , Aachen, Germany
| | - Alice Baroncini
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Clinic Aachen, RWTH Aachen University Clinic , Aachen, Germany.,Department of Spine Surgery, Eifelklinik St ., Brigida, Simmerath, Germany
| |
Collapse
|