1
|
Han Z, Nan X, Ma M, Zhou R, Wang P, Liu J, Li Y, Li Y. Effect of aspirin, warfarin, and proton-pump inhibitors on performance of fecal immunochemical test in colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Exp Med 2023; 23:4355-4368. [PMID: 37804359 DOI: 10.1007/s10238-023-01196-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/09/2023]
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the impact of antithrombotic agents and proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) on fecal immunochemical test (FIT). PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar were searched from inception until September 3, 2023. Studies comparing the diagnostic performance of FIT between medicine users and non-users in average-risk colorectal cancer screening populations were included. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values (PPVs) for advanced neoplasia (AN) of FIT were compared by reporting pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model. Twenty-two studies enrolling 5,572,367 individuals were included. For aspirin, pooled sensitivity and specificity for AN were 57.2% and 88.4% in users versus 60.2% and 93.2% in non-users; while pooled ORs were 1.49 (95% CI 0.89-2.48, P = 0.13) and 0.72 (95% CI 0.62-0.83, P < 0.001), respectively. In subgroup analysis, there was no difference in sensitivity and specificity between the two groups at the cutoff of 20 μg Hb/g (P = 0.57 and 0.29, respectively) but a significantly lower specificity in users compared with non-users at lower cutoffs (P < 0.001). Moreover, a significantly lower PPVAN in users compared with non-users was observed after matching age and sex confounders (P = 0.001). Warfarin had no significant influence on PPVAN of FIT (P = 0.43). PPIs were associated with a significantly lower PPVAN in users (P < 0.001). Aspirin use was associated with lower specificity and PPV of FIT. Aspirin discontinuation before FIT to reduce false-positive results should be interpreted with caution given concerns about cardiovascular events. Increasing cutoff values of FIT in aspirin users may be another possible approach. Additionally, warfarin withdrawal before FIT is unnecessary but PPIs withdrawal before FIT is recommended to reduce false-positive results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhongxue Han
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 107 Wenhuaxi Road, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, China
- Laboratory of Translational Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Robot Engineering Laboratory for Precise Diagnosis and Therapy of GI Tumor, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Xueping Nan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 107 Wenhuaxi Road, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, China
- Laboratory of Translational Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Robot Engineering Laboratory for Precise Diagnosis and Therapy of GI Tumor, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Mingjun Ma
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 107 Wenhuaxi Road, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, China
- Laboratory of Translational Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Robot Engineering Laboratory for Precise Diagnosis and Therapy of GI Tumor, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Ruchen Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 107 Wenhuaxi Road, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, China
- Laboratory of Translational Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Robot Engineering Laboratory for Precise Diagnosis and Therapy of GI Tumor, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Peizhu Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 107 Wenhuaxi Road, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, China
- Laboratory of Translational Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Robot Engineering Laboratory for Precise Diagnosis and Therapy of GI Tumor, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Jing Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 107 Wenhuaxi Road, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, China
- Laboratory of Translational Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Robot Engineering Laboratory for Precise Diagnosis and Therapy of GI Tumor, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Yanqing Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 107 Wenhuaxi Road, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, China
- Laboratory of Translational Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Robot Engineering Laboratory for Precise Diagnosis and Therapy of GI Tumor, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Yueyue Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 107 Wenhuaxi Road, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, China.
- Laboratory of Translational Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
- Robot Engineering Laboratory for Precise Diagnosis and Therapy of GI Tumor, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Núñez Rodríguez MªH, Díez Redondo P, Riu Pons F, Cimavilla M, Loza A, Perez-Miranda M. Findings in the distal and proximal colon in colonoscopy screening after positive FIT and related pre-procedure factors. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS : ORGANO OFICIAL DE LA SOCIEDAD ESPANOLA DE PATOLOGIA DIGESTIVA 2022; 114:719-724. [PMID: 35285657 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8409/2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colonoscopy is the gold standard method for the early diagnosis and prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC). Screening programs include immune determination of blood in feces. Regardless of the method used, proximal colon lesions appear to be detected less frequently. OBJECTIVE Analyze the characteristics of proximal and distal lesions and possible predisposing factors. METHODS A cross-sectional study was performed of 692 patients from the CRC screening program with FIT ≥ 100ngHb/ml (October 2017 - October 2018). The right colon was examined twice as patients were participating in a randomized clinical trial to re-evaluate the right colon by forward-viewing endoscope or proximal retroflexion. The adenoma detection rate (ADR), advanced neoplasia (AN) and CRC in the proximal and distal colon, the histological and morphological characteristics in each section were analyzed. RESULTS 52.9% of the patients were male, with a mean age of 59.5 years (SD: 7.6). 1490 polyps were found and the ADR was 57.7% (distal 42% and proximal 37%). Detection rates were 45.8% for AN, 40.9% for advanced adenomas, 5.2% for advanced SSL and CRC was diagnosed in 4.8% of patients. Males had more AN than females. The mean age of patients with AN was significantly higher. AN were associated with smoking and alcohol consumption (p=0.0001). Globally, FIT levels were higher in patients with AN (p=0.003). Sixty-six per cent of cancers were distally located and 61.3% of CRC were diagnosed in the early stages. CONCLUSIONS In an average-risk asymptomatic population undergoing colonoscopy after positive FIT, AN were more common in the distal colon in males, older patients, smokers and those with alcohol intake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Andrea Loza
- Endoscopias/Digestivo, Hospital Santos Reyes
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Monahan KJ, Davies MM, Abulafi M, Banerjea A, Nicholson BD, Arasaradnam R, Barker N, Benton S, Booth R, Burling D, Carten RV, D'Souza N, East JE, Kleijnen J, Machesney M, Pettman M, Pipe J, Saker L, Sharp L, Stephenson J, Steele RJ. Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) in patients with signs or symptoms of suspected colorectal cancer (CRC): a joint guideline from the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) and the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG). Gut 2022; 71:gutjnl-2022-327985. [PMID: 35820780 PMCID: PMC9484376 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) has a high sensitivity for the detection of colorectal cancer (CRC). In a symptomatic population FIT may identify those patients who require colorectal investigation with the highest priority. FIT offers considerable advantages over the use of symptoms alone, as an objective measure of risk with a vastly superior positive predictive value for CRC, while conversely identifying a truly low risk cohort of patients. The aim of this guideline was to provide a clear strategy for the use of FIT in the diagnostic pathway of people with signs or symptoms of a suspected diagnosis of CRC. The guideline was jointly developed by the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/British Society of Gastroenterology, specifically by a 21-member multidisciplinary guideline development group (GDG). A systematic review of 13 535 publications was undertaken to develop 23 evidence and expert opinion-based recommendations for the triage of people with symptoms of a suspected CRC diagnosis in primary care. In order to achieve consensus among a broad group of key stakeholders, we completed an extended Delphi of the GDG, and also 61 other individuals across the UK and Ireland, including by members of the public, charities and primary and secondary care. Seventeen research recommendations were also prioritised to inform clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin J Monahan
- The Wolfson Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, London, UK
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Michael M Davies
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Muti Abulafi
- Colorectal Surgery, Croydon Health Services NHS Trust, Croydon, Greater London, UK
| | - Ayan Banerjea
- Nottingham Colorectal Service, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Brian D Nicholson
- Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ramesh Arasaradnam
- University of Warwick, Clinical Sciences Research Institute, Coventry, UK
- Gastroenterology Department, University Hospital Coventry, Coventry, UK
| | | | - Sally Benton
- Hub Director, NHS Bowel Cancer Screening South of England Hub, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - Richard Booth
- Colorectal Surgery, Croydon University Hospital, Croydon, UK
| | - David Burling
- Radiology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, London, UK
| | | | | | - James Edward East
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Univerity of Oxford Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford, UK
- Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic Healthcare, London, UK
| | - Jos Kleijnen
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, North Yorkshire, UK
| | - Michael Machesney
- Colorectal Surgery, Whipps Cross Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Maria Pettman
- Colorectal Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Lance Saker
- General Practice, Oak Lodge Medical Centre, London, UK
| | - Linda Sharp
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Robert Jc Steele
- Surgery and Oncology Department, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Johnstone MS, Miller G, Pang G, Burton P, Kourounis G, Winter J, Crighton E, Mansouri D, Witherspoon P, Smith K, McSorley ST. Alternative diagnoses and demographics associated with a raised quantitative faecal immunochemical test in symptomatic patients. Ann Clin Biochem 2022; 59:277-287. [PMID: 35044264 PMCID: PMC9280700 DOI: 10.1177/00045632221076771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Background The faecal immunochemical test (FIT) has proven utility for colorectal cancer
detection in symptomatic patients. However, most patients with a raised
faecal haemoglobin (f-Hb) do not have colorectal cancer. We investigated
alternative diagnoses and demographics associated with a raised f-Hb in
symptomatic patients. Methods A retrospective, observational study was performed of patients with FIT
submitted between August 2018 to January 2019 in NHS Greater Glasgow and
Clyde followed by colonoscopy. Colonoscopy/pathology reports were searched
for alternative diagnoses. Covariables were compared using the χ2 test. Multivariate binary logistic regression identified independent
predictors of a raised f-Hb. Results 1272 patients were included. In addition to colorectal cancer (odds ratio
(OR), 9.27 (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.61–23.83; p
< 0.001)), older age (OR, 1.52 (95% CI: 1.00–2.32; p =
0.05)), deprivation (OR, 1.54 (95% CI: 1.21–1.94; p <
0.001)), oral anticoagulants (OR, 1.78 (95% CI: 1.01–3.15;
p = 0.046)), rectal bleeding (OR, 1.47 (95% CI:
1.15–1.88; p = 0.002)), advanced adenoma (OR, 7.52 (95% CI:
3.90–14.49; p < 0.001)), non-advanced polyps (OR, 1.78
(95% CI: 1.33–2.38; p < 0.001)) and inflammatory bowel
disease (IBD) (OR, 4.19 (95% CI: 2.17–8.07; p < 0.001))
independently predicted raised f-Hb. Deprivation (Scottish Index of Multiple
Deprivation (SIMD) 1-2: OR, 2.13 (95% CI: 1.38–3.29; p =
0.001)) independently predicted a raised f-Hb in patients with no pathology
found at colonoscopy. Conclusions An elevated f-Hb is independently associated with older age, deprivation,
anticoagulants, rectal bleeding, advanced adenoma, non-advanced polyps and
IBD in symptomatic patients. Deprivation is associated with a raised f-Hb in
the absence of pathology. This must be considered when utilising FIT in
symptomatic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark S Johnstone
- Academic Unit of Surgery, School of Medicine, 3526University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Gillian Miller
- Academic Unit of Surgery, School of Medicine, 3526University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Grace Pang
- Academic Unit of Surgery, School of Medicine, 3526University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Paul Burton
- eHealth, Corporate Services, Business Intelligence, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Georgios Kourounis
- Academic Unit of Surgery, School of Medicine, 3526University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jack Winter
- Department of Gastroenterology, 59736Glasgow Royal Infirmary, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Emilia Crighton
- Public Health, Health Service, Public Health Screening, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - David Mansouri
- Department of Coloproctology, 59736Glasgow Royal Infirmary, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Paul Witherspoon
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, 427872Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Karen Smith
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, 59736Glasgow Royal Infirmary, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Stephen T McSorley
- Academic Unit of Surgery, School of Medicine, 3526University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Faecal Haemoglobin Estimated by Faecal Immunochemical Tests-An Indicator of Systemic Inflammation with Real Clinical Potential. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11112093. [PMID: 34829442 PMCID: PMC8622944 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11112093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Multimorbidity is the major cause of ill-health and premature death in developed countries. The ability to identify individuals at risk of developing chronic disease, particularly multimorbidity, reliably, and simply, and to identify undiagnosed disorders, is vital to reducing the global burden of disease. This narrative review, the first of recent studies, demonstrates that raised faecal haemoglobin concentration (f-Hb) is associated with increased all-cause and cause-specific mortality and with longer-term conditions including diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and psoriasis, and with probable intake of particulate matter. We and others have hypothesized that elevated f-Hb (measured using a faecal immunochemical test) has considerable potential to identify individuals at risk of, or who already have, early stage, undiagnosed chronic disease. If f-Hb does prove to be an effective biomarker for chronic disease and multimorbidity, individuals with detectable f-Hb, but without an obvious source of gastrointestinal blood loss, could benefit from further assessment and early intervention. To test this hypothesis rigorously, longitudinal data-linkage methodology is required linking colorectal cancer screening data, and data on patients presenting with lower gastrointestinal symptoms, with routinely collected health information.
Collapse
|
6
|
False-positive fecal immunochemical test results in colorectal cancer screening and gastrointestinal drug use. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36:1861-1869. [PMID: 33982138 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-03947-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The study aimed to determine the influence of drug treatments (proton pump inhibitors [PPIs] combined with other drugs) on the false-positive (FP) rate in the fecal immunochemical test (FIT). METHODS Patients undergoing colonoscopy in the setting of a CRC screening program due to a positive FIT result were included prospectively. Demographic data and drug intake of PPIs, antiplatelet therapy (APA), anticoagulants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were collected. An FP FIT result was considered normal colonoscopy or with nonneoplastic pathology (NNP). Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the effect of these drugs on the rate of FP FIT results. RESULTS We included 515 patients, and 59% (304/515) were males. The rate of FP FIT results was 48% (249/515). Study drug use was higher in patients > 60 years old and females than in those < 60 years old and males (p < 0.001 and p = 0.049, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that female sex (OR = 2.7 95% CI 1.9-3.9), NNP (OR = 1.5 95% CI 1.1-2.2), and the use of any of the study drugs (OR = 1.4 95% CI 0.9-2.0) were independent risk factors for FP FIT results. The risk of FP FIT results was significantly higher in PPI users than in nonusers (OR = 1.8 95% CI 1.1-2.9), specifically when PPIs were combined with other drugs (OR = 2.01 95% CI 1.1-3.6) only in men. CONCLUSION Female sex, NNP, and PPIs combined with other drugs in males were identified as independent risk factors for FP FIT results.
Collapse
|
7
|
Gies A, Niedermaier T, Alwers E, Hielscher T, Weigl K, Heisser T, Schrotz-King P, Hoffmeister M, Brenner H. Consistent Major Differences in Sex- and Age-Specific Diagnostic Performance among Nine Faecal Immunochemical Tests Used for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:3574. [PMID: 34298786 PMCID: PMC8306133 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13143574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Evidence on diagnostic performance of faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) by sex and age is scarce. We aimed to evaluate FIT performance for detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia (AN) by sex and age across nine different FIT brands in a colonoscopy-controlled setting. The faecal samples were obtained from 2042 participants of colonoscopy screening. All eligible cases with AN (n = 216) and 300 randomly selected participants without AN were included. Diagnostic performance for detection of AN was assessed by sex and age (50-64 vs. 65-79 years for each of the nine FITs individually and for all FITs combined. Sensitivity was consistently lower, and specificity was consistently higher for females as compared with males (pooled values at original FIT cutoffs, 25.7% vs. 34.6%, p = 0.12 and 96.2% vs. 90.8%, p < 0.01, respectively). Positive predictive values (PPVs) were similar between both sexes, but negative predictive values (NPVs) were consistently higher for females (pooled values, 91.8% vs. 86.6%, p < 0.01). Sex-specific cutoffs attenuated differences in sensitivities but increased differences in predictive values. According to age, sensitivities and specificities were similar, whereas PPVs were consistently lower and NPVs were consistently higher for the younger participants. A negative FIT is less reliable in ruling out AN among men than among women and among older than among younger participants. Comparisons of measures of diagnostic performance among studies with different sex or age distributions should be interpreted with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anton Gies
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Division of Preventive Oncology, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (A.G.); (P.S.-K.); (H.B.)
| | - Tobias Niedermaier
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (E.A.); (K.W.); (T.H.); (M.H.)
| | - Elizabeth Alwers
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (E.A.); (K.W.); (T.H.); (M.H.)
| | - Thomas Hielscher
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Biostatistics, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
| | - Korbinian Weigl
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (E.A.); (K.W.); (T.H.); (M.H.)
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Heisser
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (E.A.); (K.W.); (T.H.); (M.H.)
- Medical Faculty Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Petra Schrotz-King
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Division of Preventive Oncology, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (A.G.); (P.S.-K.); (H.B.)
| | - Michael Hoffmeister
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (E.A.); (K.W.); (T.H.); (M.H.)
| | - Hermann Brenner
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Division of Preventive Oncology, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (A.G.); (P.S.-K.); (H.B.)
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (E.A.); (K.W.); (T.H.); (M.H.)
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chandrapalan S, Hee SW, Widlak MM, Farrugia A, Alam MT, Smith S, Arasaradnam RP. Performance of the faecal immunochemical test for the detection of colorectal neoplasms and the role of proton pump inhibitors in their diagnostic accuracy. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:1649-1657. [PMID: 33991166 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
AIM The faecal immunochemical test (FIT) is currently utilized in both symptomatic and screening populations, but little is known about factors that affect its performance. For example, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy has been purported to increase false negative rates. This has significant implications given the extent of PPI prescriptions. The aim of this work was to evaluate the performance of the FIT for the detection of colorectal neoplasms and the impact of PPI therapy on its diagnostic accuracy. METHOD Symptomatic patients referred on the suspected cancer pathway and those on polyp surveillance between 2015 and 2019 were approached to participate. Estimates of the accuracy of FIT at different cut-off levels in diagnosing colorectal neoplasms were made. Logistic regression was used to assess the effect of PPIs on the FIT results. RESULTS A total of 667 participants were eligible for the final analysis. At a cut-off of 10 μg/g faeces, the overall sensitivity and specificity of FIT for the detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) was 0.85 (95% CI 0.71-0.94) and 0.81 (95% CI 0.78-0.84), respectively. For the detection of advanced neoplasia, the sensitivity was 0.70 (95% CI 0.58-0.79) and the specificity was 0.83 (95% CI 0.80-0.86). At higher thresholds, the sensitivity steadily declined whilst specificity increased. PPI therapy did not have a significant effect on performance of the FIT. CONCLUSION FIT is a good rule-out test for the detection of CRC and advanced neoplasia at lower thresholds. PPI therapy does not appear to have an effect on its diagnostic performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Subashini Chandrapalan
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.,University Hospital of Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK
| | - Siew Wan Hee
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Monika M Widlak
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.,University Hospital of Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK
| | - Alexia Farrugia
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.,University Hospital of Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK
| | - Mohammed T Alam
- Department of Biology, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, UAE
| | - Steve Smith
- Midlands and North West Bowel Cancer Screening Hub, University Hospital of Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK
| | - Ramesh P Arasaradnam
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.,University Hospital of Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK.,Health, Biological and Experimental Sciences, University of Coventry, Coventry, UK.,School of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chandrapalan S, Bosch S, Cubiella J, Guardiola J, Kimani P, Mulder C, Persaud K, de Meij TGJ, Altomare DF, Brenner H, de Boer NKH, Ricciardiello L, Arasaradnam RP. Systematic review with meta-analysis: volatile organic compound analysis to improve faecal immunochemical testing in the detection of colorectal cancer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2021; 54:14-23. [PMID: 34004036 DOI: 10.1111/apt.16405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Revised: 03/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Faecal immunochemical test (FIT) is emerging as a valid test to rule-out the presence of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the accuracy of FIT is dependent on the cut-off applied. An additional low-cost test could improve further detection of CRC. AIMS To evaluate the efficacy of combined FIT and volatile organic compounds (VOC) in the detection of CRC within symptomatic populations. METHODS Systematic reviews on the diagnostic accuracy of FIT and VOC, for the detection of CRC, were updated. Meta-analyses were performed adopting a bivariate model for sensitivity and specificity. Clinical utility of combined FIT and VOC was estimated using Fagan's nomogram. Post-test probability of FIT negatives was used as a pre-test probability for VOC. RESULTS The pooled sensitivity and specificity of FIT at 10 µg/g faeces, for the detection of CRC, were 0.914 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.894-0.936) and 0.783 (CI = 0.850-0.696), respectively. For VOC, the sensitivity was 0.837 (CI = 0.781-0.881) and the specificity was 0.803 (CI = 0.870-0.712). The area under the curve for FIT and VOC were 0.926 and 0.885, respectively. In a population with 5% CRC prevalence, the estimated probability of having CRC following a negative FIT was 0.5% and following both negative FIT and VOC was 0.1%. CONCLUSIONS In a FIT-negative symptomatic population, VOC can be a good test to rule-out the presence of CRC. The estimated probability reduction by 0.4% when both tests being negative offers adequate safety netting in primary care for the exclusion of CRC. The number needed to colonoscope to identify one CRC is eight if either FIT or VOC positive. Cost-effectiveness and clinical accuracy of this approach will need further evaluation.
Collapse
|
10
|
Proton-pump inhibitors are associated with a high false-positivity rate in faecal immunochemical testing. J Gastroenterol 2021; 56:42-53. [PMID: 33159805 DOI: 10.1007/s00535-020-01738-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND False-positivity rates in faecal immunochemical test (FIT) can be affected by drug exposure. We aimed to assess the association between proton pump inhibitors (PPI) consumption and false positive (FP) results in a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme using electronic prescription records. METHODS A retrospective cohort study within a population-based screening program for CRC from 2010 to 2016 was performed. Participants with a conclusive FIT result and with prescription electronic data were included. An FP result was defined as having a positive FIT (≥ 20 µg haemoglobin/g faeces) and a follow-up colonoscopy without intermediate or high-risk lesions or CRC. Screening data were anonymously linked to the public data analysis program for health research and innovation (PADRIS) database that recorded patient diseases history and reimbursed medication. PPI exposure was defined as having retrieved at least one dispensation of PPI three months prior to the FIT. RESULTS A total of 89,199 tests (of 46,783 participants) were analysed, 4824 (5.4%) tested positive and the proportion of FP was 53.5%. Overall, 17,544 participants (19.7%) were PPI users prior to FIT performance. PPI exposure increased the probability of obtaining an FP FIT result from 50.4 to 63.3% (adjusted OR 1.39; 95% CI 1.18-1.65). Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetylsalicylic acid, antibiotics, and laxatives were also associated with an FP result. The effect of PPI was independent and showed a synergistic interaction with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. CONCLUSION PPIs increase FIT positivity at the expense of FP results. The recommendation to avoid their use before FIT performance could reduce up to 3% of colonoscopies and 9% of FP results.
Collapse
|
11
|
|
12
|
FIT negative cancers: A right-sided problem? Implications for screening and whether iron deficiency anaemia has a role to play. Surgeon 2020; 19:27-32. [PMID: 32199773 DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2020.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2019] [Revised: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Faecal Immunohistochemistry Testing (FIT) is recommended as an adjunct to guide referrals from Primary Care for individuals without rectal bleeding, who do not meet the suspected cancer pathway referral guidelines. It has largely replaced Faecal Occult Blood Testing. AIMS To assess the specificity of FIT. To understand the characteristics of FIT negative cancer patients and whether they have predominantly right sided cancers. Evaluating the efficacy of FIT and Iron deficiency anaemia in combination to capture patients with colorectal cancers. METHODS A study of 1000 symptomatic patients, undergoing FIT by Clinicians during the 'Digital rectal examination'. Inclusion criteria; all patients referred via our cancer referral pathway. FIT positivity was set at 10 μg g of faeces. RESULTS There were 7 FIT negative cancers in this cohort; 1 was a lymphoma and the other 6 were caecal adenocarcinomas. 5 were anaemic. The positive predictive value of IDA was 34% compared with 'other symptoms'; 18%. The negative predictive value of FIT was 99.05% in this cohort. Specificity for FIT was 86.9% (CI 96%). CONCLUSION Two separate referral pathways for IDA and FIT positive tests, would have captured all patients except 2; the lymphoma and 1 advanced caecal adenocarcinoma. FIT is an excellent triage tool prior to colonoscopy however capturing right sided disease remains a weak point. Multivariate analysis of patients in addition to IDA and FIT should improve capture of this subgroup.
Collapse
|