Evaluation of CA125 in relation to pain symptoms among adolescents and young adult women with and without surgically-confirmed endometriosis

Subgroups of pelvic pain are differentially associated with endometriosis and inflammatory comorbidities: a latent class analysis

ABSTRACT

Chronic pelvic pain is heterogeneous with potentially clinically informative subgroups. We aimed to identify subgroups of pelvic pain based on symptom patterns and investigate their associations with inflammatory and chronic pain-related comorbidities. Latent class analysis (LCA) identified subgroups of participants (n = 1255) from the Adolescence to Adulthood (A2A) cohort. Six participant characteristics were included in the LCA: severity, frequency, and impact on daily activities of both menstruation-associated (cyclic) and non-menstruation-associated (acyclic) pelvic pain. Three-step LCA quantified associations between LC subgroups, demographic and clinical variables, and 18 comorbidities (10 with prevalence ≥10%). Five subgroups were identified: none or minimal (23%), moderate cyclic only (28%), severe cyclic only (20%), moderate or severe acyclic plus moderate cyclic (9%), and severe acyclic plus severe cyclic (21%). Endometriosis prevalence within these 5 LCA-pelvic pain-defined subgroups ranged in size from 4% in "none or minimal pelvic pain" to 24%, 72%, 70%, and 94%, respectively, in the 4 pain subgroups, with statistically significant odds of membership only for the latter 3 subgroups. Migraines were associated with significant odds of membership in all 4 pelvic pain subgroups relative to those with no pelvic pain (adjusted odds ratios = 2.92-7.78), whereas back, joint, or leg pain each had significantly greater odds of membership in the latter 3 subgroups. Asthma or allergies had three times the odds of membership in the most severe pain group. Subgroups with elevated levels of cyclic or acyclic pain are associated with greater frequency of chronic overlapping pain conditions, suggesting an important role for central inflammatory and immunological mechanisms.

World Endometriosis Research Foundation Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonization Project: V. Physical examination standards in endometriosis research

OBJECTIVE

The World Endometriosis Research Foundation established the Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonisation Project (EPHect) to create standardized documentation tools (with common data elements) to facilitate the comparison and combination of data across different research sites and studies. In 2014, 4 data research standards were published: clinician-reported surgical data, patient-reported clinical data, and fluid and tissue biospecimen collection. Our current objective is to create an EPHect standard for the clinician-reported physical examination (EPHect-PE) for research studies.

DESIGN

An international consortium involving 26 clinical and academic experts and patient partners from 11 countries representing 25 institutions and organizations. Two virtual workshops, followed by the development of the physical examination standards underwent multiple rounds of iterations and revisions.

SUBJECTS

N/A MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): N/A RESULT(S): The EPHect-PE tool provides standardized assessment of physical examination characteristics and pain phenotyping. Data elements involve examination of back and pelvic girdle; abdomen including allodynia and trigger points; vulva including provoked vestibulodynia; pelvic floor muscle tone and tenderness; tenderness on unidigital pelvic examination; presence of pelvic nodularity; uterine size and mobility; presence of adnexal masses; presence of incisional masses; speculum examination; tenderness and allodynia at an extra-pelvic site (e.g., forearm); and recording of anthropometrics.

CONCLUSION(S)

The EPHect-PE standards will facilitate the standardized documentation of the physical examination, including the assessment and documentation of examination phenotyping of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain.

Plasma proteins and persistent postsurgical pelvic pain among adolescents and young adults with endometriosis

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive biomarkers that predict surgical treatment response would inform personalized treatments and provide insight into potential biologic pathways underlying endometriosis-associated pain and symptom progression.

OBJECTIVE

To use plasma proteins in relation to the persistence of pelvic pain following laparoscopic surgery in predominantly adolescents and young adults with endometriosis using a multiplex aptamer-based proteomics biomarker discovery platform.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a prospective analysis including 142 participants with laparoscopically-confirmed endometriosis from the Women's Health Study: From Adolescence to Adulthood observational longitudinal cohort with study enrollment from 2012-2018. Biologic samples and patient data were collected with modified World Endometriosis Research Foundation Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonization Project tools. In blood collected before laparoscopic ablation or excision of endometriosis, we simultaneously measured 1305 plasma protein levels, including markers for immunity, angiogenesis, and inflammation, using SomaScan. Worsening or persistent postsurgical pelvic pain was defined as having newly developed, persistent (ie, stable), or worsening severity, frequency, or persistent life interference of dysmenorrhea or acyclic pelvic pain at 1-year postsurgery compared with presurgery. We calculated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals using logistic regression adjusted for age, body mass index, fasting status, and hormone use at blood draw. We applied Ingenuity Pathway Analysis and STRING analysis to identify pathophysiologic pathways and protein interactions.

RESULTS

The median age at blood draw was 17 years (interquartile range, 15-19 years), and most participants were White (90%). All had superficial peritoneal lesions only and were treated by excision or ablation. One-year postsurgery, pelvic pain worsened or persisted for 76 (54%) of these participants with endometriosis, whereas pelvic pain improved for 66 (46%). We identified 83 proteins associated with worsening or persistent pelvic pain 1-year postsurgery (nominal P<.05). Compared with those with improved pelvic pain 1-year postsurgery, those with worsening or persistent pelvic pain had higher plasma levels of CD63 antigen (odds ratio, 2.98 [95% confidence interval, 1.44-6.19]) and CD47 (odds ratio, 2.68 [95% confidence interval, 1.28-5.61]), but lower levels of Sonic Hedgehog protein (odds ratio, 0.55 [95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.84]) in presurgical blood. Pathways related to cell migration were up-regulated, and pathways related to angiogenesis were down-regulated in those with worsening or persistent postsurgical pelvic pain compared with those with improved pain. When we examined the change in protein levels from presurgery to postsurgery and its subsequent risk of worsening or persistent postsurgical pain at 1-year follow-up, we observed increasing levels of Sonic Hedgehog protein from presurgery to postsurgery was associated with a 4-fold increase in the risk of postsurgical pain (odds ratio [quartile 4 vs 1], 3.86 [1.04-14.33]).

CONCLUSION

Using an aptamer-based proteomics platform, we identified plasma proteins and pathways associated with worsening or persistent pelvic pain postsurgical treatment of endometriosis among adolescents and young adults that may aid in risk stratification of individuals with endometriosis.

Endometriosis and Adolescence: The Impact of Dysmenorrhea

Endometriosis affects approximately 10% of premenopausal women worldwide. Despite its impact on quality of life, the delay in diagnosing this chronic disease is well known. Many patients with endometriosis report having suffered from dysmenorrhea and chronic pelvic pain in adolescence or at a young age. However, this painful symptom is often highly underestimated and considered a normal and transient symptom in young women. The real prevalence of endometriosis in adolescence remains uncertain. Some authors recently described at least one ultrasound feature of endometriosis in 13.3% of a general population of adolescent girls, which increased to 35.3% in young girls with severe dysmenorrhea. Dysmenorrhea is classified as primary dysmenorrhea or secondary dysmenorrhea. Primary dysmenorrhea is defined as a menstrual pain without organic disease, while secondary dysmenorrhea is defined as a menstrual pain associated with organic pelvic pathology. Since endometriosis represents the main cause of secondary dysmenorrhea in adolescents and young women, it is important to determine whether the patient has primary dysmenorrhea or additional suggestive symptoms related to endometriosis. Endometriosis in adolescent patients is a challenging problem with clinical and pathological differences compared with its presentation in premenopausal women. Adolescents and young women with dysmenorrhea and painful symptoms that suggest endometriosis should be referred to dedicated endometriosis centers for an early diagnosis and appropriate medical and surgical management. This paper aims to describe the role of dysmenorrhea in adolescents and the management of these young patients to confirm or exclude endometriosis.

Plasma proteomic profiles of pain subtypes in adolescents and young adults with endometriosis

STUDY QUESTION

What are the similarities and differences in the systemic proteomic profiles by endometriosis-associated pain subtypes among adolescents and young adults with endometriosis?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Endometriosis-associated pain subtypes exhibited distinct plasma proteomic profiles.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Endometriosis patients, especially those diagnosed in adolescents and young adults, are often plagued by various pain symptoms. However, it is not clear what biological processes underlie this heterogeneity.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using data and plasma samples from 142 adolescent or young adult participants of the Women's Health Study: From Adolescence to Adulthood cohort with laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

We measured 1305 plasma protein levels by SomaScan. We classified self-reported endometriosis-associated pain into subtypes of dysmenorrhea, acyclic pelvic pain, life impacting pelvic pain, bladder pain, bowel pain, and widespread pain phenotype. We used logistic regression to calculate the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for differentially expressed proteins, adjusting for age, BMI, fasting status, and hormone use at blood draw. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis identified enriched biological pathways.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Our study population consisted mainly of adolescents and young adults (mean age at blood draw = 18 years), with nearly all (97%) scored as rASRM stage I/II at laparoscopic diagnosis of endometriosis, which is a common clinical presentation of endometriosis diagnosed at a younger age. Pain subtypes exhibited distinct plasma proteomic profiles. Multiple cell movement pathways were downregulated in cases with severe dysmenorrhea and life impacting pelvic pain compared to those without (P < 7.5×10-15). Endometriosis cases with acyclic pelvic pain had upregulation of immune cell adhesion pathways (P < 9.0×10-9), while those with bladder pain had upregulation of immune cell migration (P < 3.7×10-8) and those with bowel pain had downregulation (P < 6.5×10-7) of the immune cell migration pathways compared to those without. Having a wide-spread pain phenotype involved downregulation of multiple immune pathways (P < 8.0×10-10).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Our study was limited by the lack of an independent validation cohort. We were also only able to explore any presence of a pain subtype and could not evaluate multiple combinations by pain subtypes. Further mechanistic studies are warranted to elucidate the differences in pathophysiology by endometriosis-pain subtype.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The observed variation in plasma protein profiles by pain subtypes suggests different underlying molecular mechanisms, highlighting the need for potential consideration of pain subtypes for effectively treating endometriosis patients presenting with various pain symptoms.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This study was supported by the Department of Defense W81XWH1910318 and the 2017 Boston Center for Endometriosis Trainee Award. Financial support for establishment of and data collection within the A2A cohort were provided by the J. Willard and Alice S. Marriott Foundation. N.S., A.F.V., S.A.M., and K.L.T. have received funding from the Marriott Family Foundation. C.B.S. is funded by an R35 MIRA Award from NIGMS (5R35GM142676). S.A.M. and K.L.T. are supported by NICHD R01HD094842. S.A.M. reports serving as an advisory board member for AbbVie and Roche, Field Chief Editor for Frontiers in Reproductive Health, personal fees from Abbott for roundtable participation; none of these are related to this study. Other authors report no conflict of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

How to Improve Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Endometriosis with Advanced Statistical Methods

Background and Objectives: Endometriosis is one of the most common gynecological disorders in women of reproductive age. Causing pelvic pain and infertility, it is considered one of the most serious health problems, being responsible for work absences or productivity loss. Its diagnosis is often delayed because of the need for an invasive laparoscopic approach. Despite years of studies, no single marker for endometriosis has been discovered. The aim of this research was to find an algorithm based on symptoms and laboratory tests that could diagnose endometriosis in a non-invasive way. Materials and Methods: The research group consisted of 101 women hospitalized for diagnostic laparoscopy, among which 71 had confirmed endometriosis. Data on reproductive history were collected in detail. CA125 (cancer antigen-125) level and VEGF1(vascular endothelial growth factor 1) were tested in blood samples. Among the used statistical methods, the LASSO regression-a new important statistical tool eliminating the least useful features-was the only method to have significant results. Results: Out of 19 features based on results of LASSO, 7 variables were chosen: body mass index, age of menarche, cycle length, painful periods, information about using contraception, CA125, and VEGF1. After multivariate logistic regression with a backward strategy, the three most significant features were evaluated. The strongest impact on endometriosis prediction had information about painful periods, CA125 over 15 u/mL, and the lowest BMI, with a sensitivity of 0.8800 and a specificity of 0.8000, respectively. Conclusions: Advanced statistical methods are crucial when creating non-invasive tests for endometriosis. An algorithm based on three easy features, including painful menses, BMI level, and CA125 concentration could have an important place in the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. If confirmed in a prospective study, implementing such an algorithm in populations with a high risk of endometriosis will allow us to cover patients suspected of endometriosis with proper treatment.

Analysis of risk factors for sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the risk factors of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis in patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC), and to establish a risk nomogram model.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, the clinical data of 79 EC patients who were treated in Zhumadian Central Hospital from January 2019 to January 2021 were analyzed. The patients were divided into SLN positive group and SLN negative group according to the occurrence of SLN metastasis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to explore the factors affecting the occurrence of SLN metastasis in EC patients. The nomogram model predicting the risk of SLN metastasis in EC patients was constructed. The discrimination, accuracy and clinical benefit rate of the model were evaluated.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis showed that body mass index (BMI) ≥ 24 kg/m², tumor diameter ≥ 2 cm, low differentiation, and cervical stromal involvement were risk factors for SLN metastasis in EC patients (P < 0.05). And the risk of SLN in EC patients increased with the increase in human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) level (P < 0.05). The constructed nomogram model was tested, and the area under the curve (AUC) of the model was 0.934 (95% CI: 0.878-0.979), the calibration curve obtained a Brier of 0.084. Decision curve results showed that 68 out of every 100 EC patients could benefit without compromising the interests of others, with a benefit rate of 68%.

CONCLUSION

The occurrence of SLN in EC patients is related to their personal general characteristics, pathological characteristics, tumor markers, and other multi-dimensional indicators. The medical staff can evaluate the SLN risk of EC patients by combining multiple indicators.

Circulating proteomic profiles associated with endometriosis in adolescents and young adults

STUDY QUESTION

What are the systemic molecular profiles of endometriosis diagnosed in adolescents and young adults?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Significant enrichment and increased activation of proteins related to angiogenesis and cell migration pathways were observed in endometriosis cases compared to controls (P-value < 2.4 × 10-8).

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Little is known about the pathophysiology of adolescent endometriosis despite the fact that over 50% of adults with endometriosis report onset of severe pelvic pain during adolescence.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A cross-sectional analysis using data on 142 laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis cases and 74 controls from the observational longitudinal cohort of Women's Health Study: From Adolescence to Adulthood (A2A).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

We measured 1305 plasma protein levels using the validated, multiplex aptamer-based proteomics discovery platform, SOMAscan. We calculated odds ratios and 95% CIs using logistic regression adjusting for age, BMI, fasting status and hormone use at blood draw for differentially expressed proteins (P < 0.05). Ingenuity Pathway Analysis and STRING analysis were performed to identify biological pathways and protein interactions. We also examined proteins and pathways associated with superficial peritoneal lesion colors (i.e. red, vascularized, white, blue/black, brown).

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Average age at blood draw was 18 years for endometriosis cases and 22 years for controls. We identified 63 proteins associated with endometriosis with type-I error set at 0.05, and absolute fold change >1.2, revealing significant enrichment of dysregulated proteins in biological pathways associated with endometriosis. Increased activation of pathways related to angiogenesis and cell migration was observed in plasma from endometriosis cases compared to controls (P-value < 2.4 × 10-8). Furthermore, when we examined proteins and pathways associated with lesion colors, vascularized lesions were associated with upregulation of pathways related to immune cell migration/activation and inflammation, whereas white, blue/black and brown lesions were associated with downregulation of these pathways.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Validation of our results in independent datasets and mechanistic studies are warranted to further our understanding of the pathophysiological characteristics of this common but understudied patient population.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

To our knowledge, this was the first study to comprehensively examine circulating proteins in predominantly adolescents and young adult women with and without endometriosis. Results from this study provide novel biological insight that will build toward further research to elucidate endometriosis pathophysiology during the earlier course of the disease trajectory.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This study was supported by the Department of Defense (W81XWH1910318) and the 2017 Boston Center for Endometriosis Trainee Award. Financial support for establishment of and data collection within the A2A cohort were provided by the J. Willard and Alice S. Marriott Foundation. N.S., A.F.V., S.A.M., K.L.T. have received funding from Marriott Family Foundation. S.A.M. and K.L.T. are supported by NICHD (R01 HD94842). S.A.M. serves as an advisory board member for AbbVie and Roche; neither are related to this study. The authors report no conflict of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Endometriosis at all ages: diagnostic ultrasound

Endometriosis is a gynecological disease affecting about 10% of the female population. The multifactorial hormonal, inflammatory, genetic, mental and behavior pathogenesis can result in chronic pelvic pain, blooding disorders and infertility causing disruption of quality of life. Correct diagnosis of the extension and topography is substantial in defining the adequate therapeutic strategy. In an increasing proportion of the cases, endometriosis is being managed medically and para-medically; diagnostic or therapeutic surgery can often be avoided or delayed. Transvaginal sonography is considered being the first-line imaging method in the diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis. The paradigm shift from the belief that endometriosis only affects women of reproductive age has drawn attention to endometriosis in both premenarchal and postmenopausal patients. This review resumes the actually recommended ultrasound signs in the case of patients in menstrual age. Specific diagnostic approaches in adolescent and menopausal patients are highlighted.

Presurgical blood metabolites and risk of postsurgical pelvic pain in young patients with endometriosis

OBJECTIVE

To identify metabolites in presurgical blood associated with risk of persistent postsurgical pelvic pain 1 year after endometriosis surgery in adolescent and young adult patients.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study within the Women's Health Study: From Adolescence to Adulthood, a US-based longitudinal cohort of adolescents and women enrolled from 2012-2018.

SETTING

Two tertiary care hospitals.

PATIENT(S)

Laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis patients (n = 180) with blood collected before their endometriosis surgery. Of these, 77 patients additionally provided blood samples 5 weeks to 6 months after their surgery. We measured plasma metabolites using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, and a total of 390 known metabolites were included in our analysis.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Persistent postsurgical pelvic pain, defined as severe, life-impacting pelvic pain 1 year after endometriosis surgery.

RESULT(S)

Most patients (>95%) were at stage I/II of the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification. Their average age at diagnosis was 18.7 years, with 36% reporting persistent postsurgical pelvic pain. Of the 21 metabolites in presurgical blood that were associated with risk of persistent postsurgical pelvic pain, 19 metabolites, which were mainly lipid metabolites, were associated with increased risk. Only 2 metabolites-pregnenolone sulfate (odds ratio = 0.64, 95% confidence interval = 0.44-0.92) and fucose (odds ratio = 0.69, 95% confidence interval = 0.47-0.97)-were associated with decreased risk. Metabolite set enrichment analysis revealed that higher levels of lysophosphatidylethanolamines (false discovery rate = 0.01) and lysophosphatidylcholines (false discovery rate = 0.01) in presurgical blood were associated with increased risk of persistent postsurgical pelvic pain.

CONCLUSION(S)

Our results suggest that dysregulation of multiple groups of lipid metabolites may play a role in the persistence of pelvic pain postsurgery among young endometriosis patients.

ESHRE guideline: endometriosis

STUDY QUESTION

How should endometriosis be diagnosed and managed based on the best available evidence from published literature?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The current guideline provides 109 recommendations on diagnosis, treatments for pain and infertility, management of disease recurrence, asymptomatic or extrapelvic disease, endometriosis in adolescents and postmenopausal women, prevention and the association with cancer.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Endometriosis is a chronic condition with a plethora of presentations in terms of not only the occurrence of lesions, but also the presence of signs and symptoms. The most important symptoms include pain and infertility.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

The guideline was developed according to the structured methodology for development of ESHRE guidelines. After formulation of key questions by a group of experts, literature searches and assessments were performed. Papers published up to 1 December 2020 and written in English were included in the literature review.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS

Based on the collected evidence, recommendations were formulated and discussed within specialist subgroups and then presented to the core guideline development group (GDG) until consensus was reached. A stakeholder review was organized after finalization of the draft. The final version was approved by the GDG and the ESHRE Executive Committee.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

This guideline aims to help clinicians to apply best care for women with endometriosis. Although studies mostly focus on women of reproductive age, the guideline also addresses endometriosis in adolescents and postmenopausal women. The guideline outlines the diagnostic process for endometriosis, which challenges laparoscopy and histology as gold standard diagnostic tests. The options for treatment of endometriosis-associated pain symptoms include analgesics, medical treatments and surgery. Non-pharmacological treatments are also discussed. For management of endometriosis-associated infertility, surgical treatment and/or medically assisted reproduction are feasible. While most of the more recent studies confirm previous ESHRE recommendations, there are five topics in which significant changes to recommendations were required and changes in clinical practice are to be expected.

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

The guideline describes different management options but, based on existing evidence, no firm recommendations could be formulated on the most appropriate treatments. Also, for specific clinical issues, such as asymptomatic endometriosis or extrapelvic endometriosis, the evidence is too scarce to make evidence-based recommendations.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The guideline provides clinicians with clear advice on best practice in endometriosis care, based on the best evidence currently available. In addition, a list of research recommendations is provided to stimulate further studies in endometriosis.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

The guideline was developed and funded by ESHRE, covering expenses associated with the guideline meetings, with the literature searches and with the dissemination of the guideline. The guideline group members did not receive payments. C.M.B. reports grants from Bayer Healthcare and the European Commission; Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board with ObsEva (Data Safety Monitoring Group) and Myovant (Scientific Advisory Group). A.B. reports grants from FEMaLE executive board member and European Commission Horizon 2020 grant; consulting fees from Ethicon Endo Surgery, Medtronic; honoraria for lectures from Ethicon; and support for meeting attendance from Gedeon Richter; A.H. reports grants from MRC, NIHR, CSO, Roche Diagnostics, Astra Zeneca, Ferring; Consulting fees from Roche Diagnostics, Nordic Pharma, Chugai and Benevolent Al Bio Limited all paid to the institution; a pending patent on Serum endometriosis biomarker; he is also Chair of TSC for STOP-OHSS and CERM trials. O.H. reports consulting fees and speaker's fees from Gedeon Richter and Bayer AG; support for attending meetings from Gedeon-Richter, and leadership roles at the Finnish Society for Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Nordic federation of the societies of obstetrics and gynecology. L.K. reports consulting fees from Gedeon Richter, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Dr KADE/Besins, Palleos Healthcare, Roche, Mithra; honoraria for lectures from Gedeon Richter, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Dr KADE/Besins, Palleos Healthcare, Roche, Mithra; support for attending meetings from Gedeon Richter, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Dr KADE/Besins, Palleos Healthcare, Roche, Mithra; he also has a leadership role in the German Society of Gynecological Endocrinology (DGGEF). M.K. reports grants from French Foundation for Medical Research (FRM), Australian Ministry of Health, Medical Research Future Fund and French National Cancer Institute; support for meeting attendance from European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), European Congress on Endometriosis (EEC) and ESHRE; She is an advisory Board Member, FEMaLe Project (Finding Endometriosis Using Machine Learning), Scientific Committee Chair for the French Foundation for Research on Endometriosis and Scientific Committee Chair for the ComPaRe-Endometriosis cohort. A.N. reports grants from Merck SA and Ferring; speaker fees from Merck SA and Ferring; support for meeting attendance from Merck SA; Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board with Nordic Pharma and Merck SA; she also is a board member of medical advisory board, Endometriosis Society, the Netherlands (patients advocacy group) and an executive board member of the World Endometriosis Society. E.S. reports grants from National Institute for Health Research UK, Rosetrees Trust, Barts and the London Charity; Royalties from De Gruyter (book editor); consulting fees from Hologic; speakers fees from Hologic, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Intuitive, Olympus and Karl Storz; Participation in the Medicines for Women's Health Expert Advisory Group with Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA); he is also Ambassador for the World Endometriosis Society. C.T. reports grants from Merck SA; Consulting fees from Gedeon Richter, Nordic Pharma and Merck SA; speaker fees from Merck SA, all paid to the institution; and support for meeting attendance from Ferring, Gedeon Richter and Merck SA. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

DISCLAIMER

This guideline represents the views of ESHRE, which were achieved after careful consideration of the scientific evidence available at the time of preparation. In the absence of scientific evidence on certain aspects, a consensus between the relevant ESHRE stakeholders has been obtained. Adherence to these clinical practice guidelines does not guarantee a successful or specific outcome, nor does it establish a standard of care. Clinical practice guidelines do not replace the need for application of clinical judgement to each individual presentation, nor variations based on locality and facility type. ESHRE makes no warranty, express or implied, regarding the clinical practice guidelines and specifically excludes any warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular use or purpose (Full disclaimer available at www.eshre.eu/guidelines.).