Test-retest reliability of the Performance of Upper Limb (PUL) module for muscular dystrophy patients

Performance of upper limb entry item to predict forced vital capacity in dysferlin-deficient limb girdle muscular dystrophy

Dysferlin-deficient limb girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD R2), also referred to as dysferlinopathy, can be associated with respiratory muscle weakness as the disease progresses. Clinical practice guidelines recommend biennial lung function assessments in patients with dysferlinopathy to screen for respiratory impairment. However, lack of universal access to spirometry equipment and trained specialists makes regular monitoring challenging. This study investigated the use of the Performance of Upper Limb (PUL) clinical scale entry item as a low-cost screening tool to identify patients with dysferlinopathy at risk of respiratory impairment. Using data from 193 patients from the Jain Foundation's International Clinical Outcomes Study, modelling identified a significant positive relationship between the PUL entry item and forced vital capacity (FVC). Eighty-eight percent of patients with the lowest PUL entry item score of 1 presented with FVC % predicted values of <60 %, suggestive of respiratory impairment. By contrast, only 10 % of the remainder of the cohort (PUL entry item of 2 or more) had an FVC of <60 %. This relationship also held true when accounting for ambulatory status, age, and sex as possible confounding factors. In summary, our results suggest that the PUL entry item could be implemented in clinical practice to screen for respiratory impairment where spirometry is not readily available.

Development of the Brazilian version of the Performance of Upper Limb scale for children and adolescents with Duchenne muscular dystrophy

BACKGROUND

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is one of the most common and disabling childhood genetic diseases. The course of DMD involves progressive muscular degeneration and weakness, leading to functional decline. The Performance of the Upper Limb scale (PUL) is a specific instrument designed to assess the upper limb function of patients with DMD.

OBJECTIVE

To adapt the PUL cross-culturally to Brazilian Portuguese (PUL-Br) and assess the convergent validity, structural validity, inter-rater reliability, and internal consistency for Brazilian patients with DMD METHODS: The cross-cultural adaptation involved six steps: translation to Brazilian Portuguese, Brazilian Portuguese translation synthesis, back-translation to English, back-translation synthesis, an expert committee review, and a pre-final version test (n = 12). The convergent validity of the PUL-Br was evaluated by examining its correlation to the Motor Function Measure scale (MFM) using 30 patients with DMD. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to assess structural validity. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) verified the PUL-Br interrater reliability. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to verify internal consistency.

RESULTS

The PUL was cross-culturally adapted to Brazilian Portuguese. A strong and positive correlation was found between the PUL-Br total score and the total score on the MFM (r = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.67, 0.91). The PUL-Br showed a satisfactory fit of the data to the three-factor model, excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC: 0.94), and good internal consistency (Cronbach's: 0.91).

CONCLUSION

The PUL-Br is valid and reliable for assessing the upper limb function of Brazilian patients with DMD.

Experimental Validation of an Upper Limb Benchmarking Framework in Healthy and Post-Stroke Individuals: A Pilot Study

In the context of neurorehabilitation, there have been rapid and continuous improvements in sensors-based clinical tools to quantify limb performance. As a result of the increasing integration of technologies in the assessment procedure, the need to integrate evidence-based medicine with benchmarking has emerged in the scientific community. In this work, we present the experimental validation of our previously proposed benchmarking scheme for upper limb capabilities in terms of repeatability, reproducibility, and clinical meaningfulness. We performed a prospective multicenter study on neurologically intact young and elderly subjects and post-stroke patients while recording kinematics and electromyography. 60 subjects (30 young healthy, 15 elderly healthy, and 15 post-stroke) completed the benchmarking protocol. The framework was repeatable among different assessors and instrumentation. Age did not significantly impact the performance indicators of the scheme for healthy subjects. In post-stroke subjects, the movements presented decreased smoothness and speed, the movement amplitude was reduced, and the muscular activation showed lower power and lower intra-limb coordination. We revised the original framework reducing it to three motor skills, and we extracted 14 significant performance indicators with a good correlation with the ARAT clinical scale. The applicability of the scheme is wide, and it may be considered a valuable tool for upper limb functional evaluation in the clinical routine.

Functional trajectories before and after loss of ambulation in Duchenne muscular dystrophy and implications for clinical trials

This study examined functional trajectories of subjects during the transition phase between ambulatory and non-ambulatory Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) to inform clinical trial designs for new therapeutics. Ambulatory, pulmonary, and upper limb function leading up to loss of ambulation (LoA) and non-ambulatory measures following LoA were quantified; time ordering of pulmonary and upper limb milestones relative to LoA were determined; and the 10-second time threshold for 10-meter walk/run (10MWR) as a marker of approaching LOA was explored. Included in this analysis were 51 subjects aged between 7 and 18 years who experienced LoA during follow-up in the PRO-DMD-01 natural history study. Mean age at LoA was 12.7 (7.1-18.6) years. Mean annual rates of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) <80%-predicted and performance of upper limb (PUL) 1.2 total score were smaller before than after LoA, but not significantly (FVC %-predicted: 5.6% vs. 10.1%, p = 0.21; PUL 1.2 total score: 2.3 vs. 3.8 units, p = 0.20). More than half of patients experienced clinically significant deficits in FVC %-predicted and PUL 1.2 before experiencing LoA. Among subjects with baseline 10MWR >10 s, those with <1 year to LoA had similar mean ages but significantly worse mean ambulatory function at baseline compared to those with ≥1 year to LoA. Enriching DMD clinical trials for patients with declining pulmonary or upper limb function is achievable without restricting enrollment to non-ambulatory patients. The sequencing of LoA and initial deficits in pulmonary and upper limb function varied across patients and highlights the potential for composite outcomes or multi-outcome trial designs to assess disease-modifying therapies more comprehensively.

Validity of the Functional Classification of the Upper Extremities for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Objectives

Some upper-limb function assessments can evaluate treatments in the non-ambulatory stage of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). The Functional Classification of the Upper Extremities (FCUE) was developed for DMD in Japan. The FCUE is easier to use than the Performance of Upper Limb (PUL) and is more detailed than the Brooke Upper Extremity Scale. This study aimed to determine the concurrent validity of FCUE with other methods of assessment for DMD.

Methods

This retrospective study reviewed the medical records of 39 boys with DMD from the National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry to evaluate the concurrent validity of the FCUE and PUL using non-parametric Spearman rank correlation (ρ). We also determined the concurrent validity of the Brooke Upper Extremity Scale and PUL for comparison.

Results

The ρ value between the FCUE and PUL was -0.914 (P<0.001). The FCUE showed robust concurrent validity with the PUL. That correlation between the FCUE and Brooke Upper Extremity Scale gave a ρ value of -0.854 (P<0.001).

Conclusions

The FCUE had a higher concurrent validity with the PUL than with the Brooke Upper Extremity Scale. The FCUE is considered a valid assessment tool of upper-limb function in boys with DMD. Selecting the best assessment method depends on the severity of the patient's condition and a balance between assessment accuracy and evaluation time.

The Performance of Upper Limb (PUL) module in limb-girdle muscular dystrophy

Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD) is a genetic muscle disorder causing weakness and wasting of the proximal limb musculature. When ambulation is lost, the attention must be shifted to the upper limb muscles' function. We studied the upper limb muscle strength and the corresponding function in 15 LGMDR1/LGMD2A and 13 LGMDR2/LGMD2B, through the Performance of Upper Limb scale and the MRC score of upper limbs. The proximal item K and the distal items N and R were lower in LGMD2B/R2. The mean MRC score of all the muscles involved linearly correlated (r2 = 0.922) for item K in LGMD2B/R2. The functional worsening paralleled the muscles weakness in LGMD2B/R2. By contrast, at proximal level the function of LGMD2A/R1 was preserved despite muscle weakness was present, presumably due to compensatory strategies. Sometimes the combination of parameters might be more informative than considering them separately. PUL scale and MRC might be interesting outcome measures in non-ambulant patients.

Antisense Morpholino-Based In Vitro Correction of a Pseudoexon-Generating Variant in the SGCB Gene

Limb-girdle muscular dystrophies (LGMD) are clinically and genetically heterogenous presentations displaying predominantly proximal muscle weakness due to the loss of skeletal muscle fibers. Beta-sarcoglycanopathy (LGMDR4) results from biallelic molecular defects in SGCB and features pediatric onset with limb-girdle involvement, often complicated by respiratory and heart dysfunction. Here we describe a patient who presented at the age of 12 years reporting high creatine kinase levels and onset of cramps after strenuous exercise. Instrumental investigations, including a muscle biopsy, pointed towards a diagnosis of beta-sarcoglycanopathy. NGS panel sequencing identified two variants in the SGCB gene, one of which (c.243+1548T>C) was found to promote the inclusion of a pseudoexon between exons 2 and 3 in the SGCB transcript. Interestingly, we detected the same genotype in a previously reported LGMDR4 patient, deceased more than twenty years ago, who had escaped molecular diagnosis so far. After the delivery of morpholino oligomers targeting the pseudoexon in patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells, we observed the correction of the physiological splicing and partial restoration of protein levels. Our findings prompt the analysis of the c.243+1548T>C variant in suspected LGMDR4 patients, especially those harbouring monoallelic SGCB variants, and provide a further example of the efficacy of antisense technology for the correction of molecular defects resulting in splicing abnormalities.

The neurocognitive profile of adults with Becker muscular dystrophy in the Netherlands

Background:

In Becker muscular dystrophy evidence for neurocognitive and behavioral comorbidity is evolving. More insight into the extend of these problems is of great importance for early detection and remediation in clinical practice.

Objective:

In this study we aimed to describe the neurocognitive and behavioral features of a Dutch adult cohort of BMD patients, and to evaluate correlations to motor function outcomes.

Methods:

28 adult BMD patients were included. Intelligence, executive functioning, verbal memory and reaction times were assessed cross-sectionally. Additionally, patients completed questionnaires on behavioral and emotional symptoms, psychosocial and executive functions. Results were compared to normative data and correlated with disease severity as measured by the 10-meter run/walk test and Performance of the Upper Limb version 1.2.

Results:

15 patients (53.6%) had a high educational level despite frequent grade repeating (48.3%) during primary or secondary school. Neuropsychological testing revealed that intellectual abilities, verbal memory, processing speed and executive functioning were statistically significant below average, but still within normal range. Regarding outcomes of the behavioral questionnaires, no significant differences were reported compared to the norm population. No relevant correlations with disease severity were found.

Conclusions:

This cohort of adult BMD patients exhibits minor cognitive impairments and no significant behavioral problems. The lower outcomes on processing speed and verbal memory, combined with the relatively high prevalence of grade repeating during primary and secondary school, implies that these minor impairments played a role in childhood. However, the on average high educational levels suggests that they grow out of their cognitive impairments with ageing.

Rehabilitation Challenges in Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophies

Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD) is a burdensome progressive neuromuscular disease, with a great impact upon quality of life. Unlike other types of neuromuscular dystrophies, which have onset in early childhood and severely limit the life expectancy, LGMD is usually diagnosed at young adulthood age. Since no etiological treatment is currently available, physiotherapy and generally, rehabilitation therapy, are mandatory for preserving the functional capabilities of the muscles for as long as possible. Exercise therapy, electrical stimulation or novel therapies such as exoskeleton devices aim towards alleviating the impact of disability. It is ideal that muscular dystrophy should be assessed in interdisciplinary clinics (physical therapy, neurology, cardiology, pneumology, surgery and orthopedics) for proper long-term care. Keywords: LGMD, muscle strength, rehabilitation, quality of life,

User-centred assistive SystEm for arm Functions in neUromuscuLar subjects (USEFUL): a randomized controlled study

Background

Upper limb assistive devices can compensate for muscular weakness and empower the user in the execution of daily activities. Multiple devices have been recently proposed but there is still a lack in the scientific comparison of their efficacy.

Methods

We conducted a cross-over multi-centric randomized controlled trial to assess the functional improvement at the upper limb level of two arms supports on 36 patients with muscular dystrophy. Participants tested a passive device (i.e., Wrex by Jaeco) and a semi-active solution for gravity compensation (i.e., Armon Ayura). We evaluated devices’ effectiveness with an externally-assessed scale (i.e., Performance of the Upper Limb-PUL-module), a self-perceived scale (i.e., Abilhand questionnaire), and a usability scale (i.e., System Usability Scale). Friedman’s test was used to assess significant functional gain for PUL module and Abilhand questionnaire. Moreover, PUL changes were compared by means of the Friedman’s test.

Results

Most of the patients improved upper limb function with the use of arm supports (median PUL scores increase of 1–3 points). However, the effectiveness of each device was related to the level of residual ability of the end-user. Slightly impaired patients maintained the same independence without and with assistive devices, even if they reported reduced muscular fatigue for both devices. Moderately impaired patients enhanced their arm functionality with both devices, and they obtained higher improvements with the semi-active one (median PUL scores increase of 9 points). Finally, severely impaired subjects benefited only from the semi-active device (median PUL scores increase of 12 points). Inadequate strength was recognized as a barrier to passive devices. The usability, measured by the System Usability Scale, was evaluated by end-users “good” (70/100 points) for the passive, and “excellent” (80/100 points) for the semi-active device.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that assistive devices can improve the quality of life of people suffering from muscular dystrophy. The use of passive devices, despite being low cost and easy to use, shows limitations in the efficacy of the assistance to daily tasks, limiting the assistance to a predefined horizontal plane. The addition of one active degree of freedom improves efficacy and usability especially for medium to severe patients. Further investigations are needed to increase the evidence on the effect of arm supports on quality of life and diseases’ progression in subjects with degenerative disorders.

Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03127241, Registered 25th April 2017. The clinical trial was also registered as a post-market study at the Italian Ministry of Health.