The effect of breast density on the missed lesion rate in screening digital mammography determined using an adjustable-density breast phantom tailored to Japanese women

Comparative evaluation of image-based vs. text-based vs. multimodal AI approaches for automatic breast density assessment in mammograms

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In the last decade, there has been a growing interest in applying artificial intelligence (AI) systems to breast cancer assessment, including breast density evaluation. However, few models have been developed to integrate textual mammographic reports and mammographic images. Our aims are (1) to generate a natural language processing (NLP)-based AI system, (2) to evaluate an external image-based software, and (3) to develop a multimodal system, using the late fusion approach, by integrating image and text inferences for the automatic classification of breast density according to the American College of Radiology (ACR) guidelines in mammograms and radiological reports.

METHODS

We first compared different NLP models, three based on n-gram term frequency - inverse document frequency and two transformer-based architectures, using 1533 unstructured mammogram reports as a training set and 303 reports as a test set. Subsequently, we evaluated an external image-based software using 303 mammogram images. Finally, we assessed our multimodal system taking into account both text and mammogram images.

RESULTS

Our best NLP model achieved 88 % accuracy, while the external software and the multimodal system achieved 75 % and 80 % accuracy, respectively, in classifying ACR breast densities.

CONCLUSION

Although our multimodal system outperforms the image-based tool, it currently does not improve the results offered by the NLP model for ACR breast density classification. Nevertheless, the promising results observed here open the possibility to more comprehensive studies regarding the utilization of multimodal tools in the assessment of breast density.

A review of screening mammography: The benefits and radiation risks put into perspective

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND

In medical imaging a benefit to risk analysis is required when justifying or implementing diagnostic procedures. Screening mammography is no exception and in particular concerns around the use of radiation to help diagnose cancer must be addressed.

METHODS

The Medline database and various established reports on breast screening and radiological protection were utilised to explore this review.

RESULTS/DISCUSSION

The benefit of screening is well argued; the ability to detect and treat breast cancer has led to a 91% 5-year survival rate and 497 deaths prevented from breast cancer amongst 100,000 screened women. Subsequently, screening guidelines by various countries recommend annual, biennial or triennial screening from ages somewhere between 40-74 years. Whilst the literature presents different perspectives on screening younger and older women, the current evidence of benefit for screening women <40 and ≥75 years is currently not strong. The radiation dose and associated risk delivered to each woman for a single examination is dependent upon age, breast density and breast thickness, however the average mean glandular dose is around 2.5-3 mGy, and this would result in 65 induced cancers and 8 deaths per 100,000 women over a screening lifetime from 40-74 years. This results in a ratio of lives saved to deaths from induced cancer of 62:1.

CONCLUSION

Therefore, compared to the potential mortality reduction achievable with screening mammography, the risk is small.