Changes in BP induced by passive leg raising predict response to fluid loading in critically ill patients

Differential Cardiac Responses after Passive Leg Raising

This study retrospectively examined the hemodynamic effects of passive leg raising (PLR) in mechanically ventilated patients during fluid removal before spontaneous breathing trials. In previous studies, we noticed varying cardiac responses after PLR completion, particularly in positive tests. Using a bioreactance monitor, we recorded and analyzed hemodynamic parameters, including stroke volume and cardiac index (CI), before and after PLR in post-acute ICU patients. We included 27 patients who underwent 60 PLR procedures. In preload-unresponsive patients, no significant CI changes were observed (CI_t-6 = 3.7 [2.6; 4.7] mL/min/m2 vs. CI_t9 = 3.3 [2.5; 3.4] mL/min/m2; p = 0.306), while in preload-responsive patients, two distinct CI response types to PLR were identified: a transient peak with immediate return to baseline (CI_t-6 = 2.7 [2.5; 3.1] mL/min/m2 vs. 3.3 [2.6; 3.8] L/min/m2; p = 0.119) and a sustained CI elevation lasting beyond the PLR maneuver (CI_t-6 = 2.8 [2.3; 2.9] L/min/m2 vs. 3.3 [2.8; 3.9] ml/min/m2; p = 0.034). The latter was particularly noted when ΔCI during PLR exceeded 25%. Our findings suggest that in certain preload-responsive patients, PLR can induce a more sustained increase in CI, indicating a possible persistent hemodynamic effect. This effect could be due to a combination of autotransfusion and sympathetic activation affecting venous return and vascular tone. Further research in larger cohorts and more comprehensive hemodynamic assessments are warranted to validate these observations and elucidate the possible underlying mechanisms.The Fluid unLoading On Weaning (FLOW) study was prospectively registered under the ID NCT04496583 on 2020-07-29 at ClinicalTrials.gov.

Venom Hypersensitivity

Stinging insects are a frequent cause of local and systemic hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis. For those with a history of life-threatening anaphylaxis, venom immunotherapy is effective, safe, and can be life-saving. Arachnids are a much less common source of envenomation through bites or stings and are less likely to cause a hypersensitivity reaction. However, recognizing the clinical manifestations when they do present is important for accurate diagnosis and treatment, and, when indicated, consideration of other diagnoses.

Blood pressure response to clonidine in children with short stature is correlated with postural characteristics: a retrospective cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Clonidine stimulation test has been widely used in the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in children with short stature with a high level of reliability. However, it may cause hypotension, which usually appears as headache, dizziness, bradycardia, and even syncope. It is well known that elevating the beds to make patients' feet above their cardiac level might relieve this discomfort. However, the real efficiency of this method remains to be proved while the best angle for the elevated bed is still unclear.

METHODS

A total of 1200 children with short stature were enrolled in this retrospective cross-sectional study. Age, gender, weight, and basic systolic and diastolic blood pressure were collected. Blood pressure at 1, 2, 3, and 4 h after stimulation tests were recorded. The participants were divided into 3 groups based on the angles of the elevated foot of their beds named 0°, 20°, and 40° groups.

RESULTS

At one hour after the commencement of the tests, participants lying on the elevated beds showed a higher mean increase on the change of pulse pressure. The difference in the angles of the elevated beds did not show statistical significance compared with those who did not elevate their beds (0.13 vs. 2.83, P = 0.001; 0.13 vs. 2.18, P = 0.005; 2.83 vs. 2.18, P = 0.369). When it came to 4 h after the tests began, participants whose beds were elevated at an angle around 20° had a significantly higher mean increase in the change of pulse pressure values compared with those whose beds were elevated at an angle around 40° (1.46 vs. -0.05, P = 0.042).

CONCLUSION

Elevating the foot of the beds of the patients who are undergoing clonidine stimulation tests at an angle of 20°might be a good choice to alleviate the hypotension caused by the tests.

Differences in Hemodynamic Response to Passive Leg Raising Tests during the Day in Healthy Individuals: The Question of Normovolemia

BACKGROUND

The passive leg-raising (PLR) test was developed to predict fluid responsiveness and reduce fluid overload. However, the hemodynamic response of healthy individuals to the PLR test and how it changes during the day, between the morning and evening, after individuals have consumed food and fluids, has not been profoundly explored. This study aimed to compare the systemic hemodynamic changes in healthy individuals between morning and evening PLR tests.

METHODS

In this study, the PLR test was performed twice a day. The first PLR test was performed between 08h00 and 09h00 in the morning, while the second PLR test was performed between 20h00 and 21h00 in the evening. Hemodynamic parameters were measured using an impedance cardiography monitor, and a cutoff value of a 10% increase in stroke volume (SV) during the PLR test was used to differentiate between preload responders and non-responders.

RESULTS

We included 50 healthy volunteers in this study. When comparing the morning and evening PLR test results, we found no PLR-induced differences in heart rate (-3 [-8-2] vs. -2 [-8-4] beats/min, p = 0.870), SV (11 [5-22] vs. 12 [4-20] mL, p = 0.853) or cardiac output (0.7 [0.2-1.3] vs. 0.8 [0.1-1.4] L/min, p = 0.639). We also observed no differences in the proportion of preload responders during the PLR test between the morning and evening (64% vs. 66%, p = 0.99). However, there was a moderate agreement between the two PLR tests (morning and evening) (kappa = 0.429, p = 0.012). There was a moderate correlation between the changes in SV between the two PLR tests (r_s = 0.50, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In young, healthy individuals, we observed no change in the systemic hemodynamic responsiveness to the PLR test between the morning and evening, without restriction of fluid and food intake.

Predictors of fluid responsiveness in the operating room: a narrative review

Prediction of fluid responsiveness has been considered an essential tool for modern fluid management. However, most studies in this field have focused on patients in intensive care unit despite numerous research throughout several decades. Therefore, the present narrative review aims to show the representative method's feasibility, advantages, and limitations in predicting fluid responsiveness, focusing on the operating room environments. Firstly, we described the predictors of fluid responsiveness based on heart-lung interaction, including pulse pressure and stroke volume variations, the measurement of respiratory variations of inferior vena cava diameter, and the end-expiratory occlusion test and addressed their limitations. Subsequently, the passive leg raising test and mini-fluid challenge tests were also mentioned, which assess fluid responsiveness by mimicking a classic fluid challenge. In the last part of this review, we pointed out the pitfalls of fluid management based on fluid responsiveness prediction, which emphasized the importance of individualized decision-making. Understanding the available representative methods to predict fluid responsiveness and their associated benefits and drawbacks through this review will aid anesthesiologists in choosing the most reliable methods for optimal fluid administration in each patient during anesthesia in the operating room.

Venom Hypersensitivity

Stinging insects are a frequent cause of local and systemic hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis. For those with a history of life-threatening anaphylaxis, venom immunotherapy is effective, safe, and can be life-saving. Arachnids are a much less common source of envenomation through bites or stings and are less likely to cause a hypersensitivity reaction. However, recognizing the clinical manifestations when they do present is important for accurate diagnosis and treatment, and, when indicated, consideration of other diagnoses.

Hemodynamic Responses to Provocative Maneuvers during Right Heart Catheterization

Rationale: Current guidelines recognize the utility of provocative maneuvers during right heart catheterization to aid the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension. Few studies have compared the performance of different provocation maneuvers. Objectives: To assess the hemodynamic correlation among three provocative maneuvers, including their effect on pulmonary hypertension classification. Methods: This prospective trial was conducted between October 2016 and May 2018. Adult patients underwent three provocative maneuvers during right heart catheterization: passive leg raise (PLR), load-targeted supine bicycle exercise, and rapid crystalloid fluid infusion. Patients were classified as follows: no pulmonary hypertension, precapillary pulmonary hypertension, isolated postcapillary pulmonary hypertension, combined pre- and postcapillary pulmonary hypertension, and uncategorized pulmonary hypertension. We assessed the hemodynamic changes associated with each maneuver. We also assessed whether provocative maneuvers led to hemodynamic reclassification of the patient to either postcapillary pulmonary hypertension with provocation or exercise pulmonary hypertension. Results: Eighty-five patients (mean age 62 ± 12 years, 53% women) were included. Correlation between exercise and fluid challenge was moderate to strong (0.49-0.82; P < 0.001) for changes in right atrial pressure, mean pulmonary arterial pressure, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure, and cardiac index from baseline. Correlation between PLR and exercise (0.4-0.65; P < 0.001) and between PLR and fluid challenge (0.45-0.6; P < 0.001) was moderate for changes in right atrial pressure, mean pulmonary arterial pressure, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, and cardiac index. Hemodynamic correlation between other provocative maneuvers was poor. Depending on provocative maneuver and classification criteria, there was significant variation in the number of patients reclassified as having exercise pulmonary hypertension (3-50%) or postcapillary pulmonary hypertension with provocation (11-48%). Conclusions: Hemodynamic determinations during exercise and fluid challenge showed moderate to strong hemodynamic correlation. Moderate hemodynamic correlation was seen between PLR and exercise or fluid challenge. Although some provocative maneuvers demonstrate good hemodynamic correlation, there is inconsistency when using these maneuvers to identify patients with postcapillary or exercise pulmonary hypertension.

Passive Leg Raise Stress Echocardiography in Severe Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis

BACKGROUND

Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is used to increase the transvalvular flow in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis. Dobutamine fails to increase the stroke volume index (SVI) in a third of patients. In this study, we tested whether passive leg raise (PLR) added to dobutamine could increase SVI and transvalvular flow in patients with severe paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis.

METHODS

Forty-five patients with apparent severe low-flow, low-gradient AS based on traditional measurements were included. Twenty-five were categorized as belonging to the "Paradox"-Group (LVEF≥50%), and twenty to the "LowEF"-Group (LVEF<50% or "classical" low-flow, low-gradient AS) for comparison. A four-step stress echocardiographic exam was performed: resting conditions ("Rest"), PLR alone ("PLR"), maximal dobutamine infusion rate ("Dmax"), and combination of Dmax and PLR ("Dmax+PLR"). AVA, (aortic valve area, cm²) SVI (ml/m2) and mean transvalvular flow (ml/s) were calculated using both, velocity-time-integral (VTI) of LV outflow tract and the Simpson-method. Changes compared to "Rest" and between the stress maneuvers were analysed.

RESULTS

In the "Paradox"-Group, compared to "Rest", LV end-diastolic volume significantly decreased under "Dmax" but was completely restored with "Dmax+PLR" ("Rest", "Dmax", "Dmax+PLR": 61±15 vs 49±18 (p<0.001) vs 61±18 ml (ns)). The smallest SVI-increase in the "Paradox"-Group was observed during "Dmax" ("PLR", "Dmax", "Dmax+PLR": VTI: 38±4 (p<0.001), 36±7 (p=0.019), 41±7 (p<0.001); Simpson: 28±6 (p<0.001), 21±7 (ns), 27±7 ml/m² (ns)). Compared to "Dmax", "Dmax+PLR" was able to achieve a higher SVI (VTI: 36±7 vs 41±7, p<0.001, Simpson: 21±7 vs 27±7 ml/m², p<0.001), and transvalvular flow in the Simpson-method only (179±56 vs 219±56 ml/s, p<0.001) as well as, additionally, a higher mean gradient (34±10 vs 39±12 mmHg, p=0.003) and AVA in the Simpson-method (0.64±0.21 vs 0.73±0.21 cm², p=0.026). In the "LowEF"-Group, only SVI VTI (31±8 vs 35±7 ml/m², p=0.034) and mean gradient (29±12 vs 34±14 mmHg, p=0.003) were higher in "Dmax+PLR". The proportion of patients with SVI VTI ≥ 35 ml/m² and an increase of SVI VTI of more than 20% compared to "Rest" was highest in "Dmax+PLR" in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Dobutamine decreases the preload in paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis. Adding PLR counteracts this effect, resulting in increased SVI and flow (in one method). The combined stress maneuver allowed reclassification of some patients from severe to moderate AS and may therefore be useful in selected cases in this population where the severity is uncertain.

Passive leg raising-induced changes in pulse pressure variation to assess fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a multicentre prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Passive leg raising-induced changes in cardiac index can be used to predict fluid responsiveness. We investigated whether passive leg raising-induced changes in pulse pressure variation (ΔPPV_PLR) can also predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients.

METHODS

In this multicentre prospective observational study, we included 270 critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation in whom volume expansion was indicated because of acute circulatory failure. We did not include patients with cardiac arrythmias. Cardiac index and PPV were measured before/during a passive leg raising test and before/after volume expansion. A volume expansion-induced increase in cardiac index of >15% defined fluid responsiveness. To investigate whether ΔPPV_PLR can predict fluid responsiveness, we determined areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) and grey zones for relative and absolute ΔPPV_PLR.

RESULTS

Of the 270 patients, 238 (88%) were on controlled mechanical ventilation with no spontaneous breathing activity and 32 (12%) were on pressure support ventilation. The median tidal volume was 7.1 (inter-quartile range [IQR], 6.6-7.6) ml kg^-1 ideal body weight. One hundred sixty-four patients (61%) were fluid responders. Relative and absolute ΔPPV_PLR predicted fluid responsiveness with an AUROC of 0.92 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.88-0.95; P<0.001) each. The grey zone for relative and absolute ΔPPV_PLR included 4.8% and 22.6% of patients, respectively. These results were not affected by ventilatory mode and baseline characteristics (type of shock, centre, vasoactive treatment).

CONCLUSIONS

Passive leg raising-induced changes in pulse pressure variation accurately predict fluid responsiveness with a small grey zone in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03225378.

To identify normovolemia in humans: The stroke volume response to passive leg raising vs. head-down tilt

Volume responsiveness can be evaluated by tilting maneuvers such as head-down tilt (HDT) and passive leg raising (PLR), but the two procedures use different references (HDT the supine position; PLR the semi-recumbent position). We tested whether the two procedures identify "normovolemia" by evaluating the stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO) responses and whether the peripheral perfusion index (PPI) derived from pulse oximetry provides similar information. In randomized order, 10 healthy men were exposed to both HDT and PLR, and evaluations were made also when the subjects fasted. Central cardiovascular variables were derived by pulse contour analysis and changes in central blood volume assessed by thoracic electrical admittance (TEA). During HDT, SV remained stable (fasted 110 ± 16 vs. 109 ± 16 ml; control 113 ± 16 vs. 111 ± 16 ml, p > 0.05) with no change in CO, TEA, PPI, or SV variation (SVV). In contrast during PLR, SV increased (fasted 108 ± 17 vs. 117 ± 17 ml; control 108 ± 18 vs. 117 ± 18 ml, p < 0.05) followed by an increase in TEA (p < 0.05) and CO increased when subjects fasted (6.7 ± 1.5 vs. 7.1 ± 1.5, p = 0.007) with no change in PPI or SVV. In conclusion, SV has a maximal value for rest in supine men, while PLR restores SV as CBV is reduced in a semi-recumbent position and the procedure thereby makes healthy volunteers seem fluid responsive.

Value of DYnamicVariation of impedance cardiac output in the diagnosis of heart failure in emergency department patients with undifferentiated dyspnea

AIM OF STUDY

Cardiac output (CO) responses to acute changes in body position and Valsalva maneuver (VM) were proposed to assess cardiac contractile reserve. We investigated the value of sitting position (SP), leg raising (LR), and VM for identifying heart failure (HF) in patients with undifferentiated dyspnea.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

It is a prospective study including patients over 18 years old admitted to the emergency department (ED) for dyspnea. Bioimpedance CO was measured at baseline, under SP, LR, and VM. HF diagnosis was based on clinical assessment, serum levels of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and echocardiography findings. Study population was divided into patients with heart failure (HF group) and patients without HF (non-HF group). Diagnostic performance of CO change under the three maneuvers was calculated by sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

290 patients were enrolled in the study. The final diagnosis was dyspnea due to congestive heart failure in 147 patients (50.7%). CO change with VM was the most accurate exam in identifying congestive heart failure as the cause of dyspnea with a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios of 79%, 60%, 1.97, and 0.36 respectively. Area under ROC curve was 0.62(95% CI, 0.55-0.69), 0.63(95% CI, 0.56-0.69), and 0.70(95% CI, 0.64-0.76) respectively for SP, LR, and VM. In a multivariate analysis, CO change with VM, but not with SP or LR, carried independent diagnostic value (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

the diagnosis of HF can be aided with use of analyzing the effect of VM on non-invasively measured CO among patients admitted to the ED with undifferentiated dyspnea. Diagnostic yield of SP and LR was poor.

Comparison of Superior Vena Cava and Inferior Vena Cava Diameter Changes by Echocardiography in Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Context:

Resuscitation of critically ill patients requires an accurate assessment of the patient's intravascular volume status. Passive leg raise cause auto transfusion of fluid to the thoracic cavity.

Aims:

This study aims to assess and compare the efficacy of superior vena cava (SVC) and inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter changes in response to passive leg raise (PLR) in predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients.

Methods:

We enrolled 30 patients. Predictive indices were obtained by transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography and were calculated as follows: (Dmax − Dmin)/Dmax for collapsibility index of SVC (cSVC) and (Dmax − Dmin)/Dmin for distensibility index of IVC (dIVC), where Dmax and Dmin are the maximal and minimal diameters of SVC and IVC. Measurements were performed at baseline and 1 min after PLR. Patients were divided into responders (increase in cardiac index (CI) ≥10%) and nonresponders (NR) (increase in CI <10% or no increase in CI).

Results:

Among those included, 24 (80%) patients were R and six were NR. There was significant rise in mean arterial pressure, decrease in heart rate, and decrease in mean cSVC from baseline to 1 min after PLR among responders. The best threshold values for discriminating R from NR was 35% for cSVC, with sensitivity and specificity of being 100%, and 25% for dIVC, with 54% sensitivity and 86.7% specificity. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for cSVC and dIVC regarding the assessment of fluid responsiveness were 1.00 and 0.66, respectively.

Conclusions:

cSVC had better sensitivity and specificity than dIVC in predicting fluid responsiveness.

Intraoperative Cardiac Arrest

Cardiac arrest in the operating room and in the immediate postoperative period is a potentially catastrophic event that is almost always witnessed and is frequently anticipated. Perioperative crises and perioperative cardiac arrest, although often catastrophic, are frequently managed in a timely and directed manner because practitioners have a deep knowledge of the patient's medical condition and details of recent procedures. It is hoped that the approaches described here, along with approaches for the rapid identification and management of specific high-stakes clinical scenarios, will help anesthesiologists continue to improve patient outcomes.

Fluid responsiveness to passive leg raising in patients with and without coronary artery disease: A prospective observational study

Introduction:

Hemodynamic stability and fluid responsiveness (FR) assume importance in perioperative management of patients undergoing major surgery. Passive leg raising (PLR) is validated in assessing FR in intensive care unit patients. Very few studies have examined FR to PLR in intraoperative scenario. We prospectively studied FR to PLR using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), in patients with no coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing major neurosurgery and those with CAD undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Methods:

We enrolled 29 adult consenting patients undergoing major neurosurgery with TEE monitoring and 25 patients undergoing CABG. After induction of anesthesia, baseline hemodynamic parameters were obtained which was followed by PLR using automated adjustment of the operating table. Clinical and TEE-derived hemodynamic parameters were recorded at 1 and 10 min after PLR following which patients were returned to supine position.

Results:

A total of 162 TEE and clinical examinations were done across baseline, 1 and 10 min after PLR; and paired comparison was done at data intervals of baseline versus 1 min PLR, baseline versus 10 min PLR, and 1 min versus 10 min PLR. There was no significant change in hemodynamic variables at any of the paired comparison intervals in patients undergoing neurosurgery. CABG cases had significant hemodynamic improvement 1 min after PLR, partially sustained at 10 min.

Conclusion:

Patients undergoing CABG had significant hemodynamic response to PLR, whereas non-CAD patients undergoing neurosurgery did not. A blood pressure–left ventricular end-diastolic volume combination represented strong correlation in response prediction (Pearson's coefficient 0.641; P < 0.01).

Bioreactance-Based Noninvasive Fluid Responsiveness and Cardiac Output Monitoring: A Pilot Study in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and Literature Review

Management of volume status, arterial blood pressure, and cardiac output are core elements in approaching the patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). For the prevention and treatment of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), euvolemia is advocated and caution is made towards the avoidance of hypervolemia. Induced hypertension and cardiac output augmentation are the mainstays of medical management during active DCI, whereas the older triple-H paradigm has fallen out of favor due to lack of demonstrable physiological or clinical benefits and serious concern for adverse effects such as pulmonary edema and multiorgan system dysfunction. Furthermore, insight into clinical hemodynamics of patients with SAH becomes salient when one considers the frequently associated cardiac and pulmonary manifestations of the disease such as SAH-associated cardiomyopathy and neurogenic pulmonary edema. In terms of fluid and volume targets, less attention has been paid to dynamic markers of fluid responsiveness despite the well-established, in the general critical care literature, superiority of these as compared to traditionally used static markers such as central venous pressure (CVP). Based on this literature and sound pathophysiologic reasoning, reliance on static markers (such as CVP) is unjustified when one attempts to assess strategies augmenting stroke volume (SV), arterial blood pressure, and oxygen delivery. There are several options for continuous bedside cardiorespiratory monitoring and optimization of SAH patients. We, here, review a noninvasive monitoring technique based on thoracic bioreactance and focusing on continuous cardiac output and fluid responsiveness markers.

Effect of Systolic Cardiac Function on Passive Leg Raising for Predicting Fluid Responsiveness: A Prospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Passive leg raising (PLR) represents a "self-volume expansion (VE)" that could predict fluid responsiveness, but the influence of systolic cardiac function on PLR has seldom been reported. This study aimed to investigate whether systolic cardiac function, estimated by the global ejection fraction (GEF) from transpulmonary-thermodilution, could influence the diagnostic value of PLR.

METHODS

This prospective, observational study was carried out in the surgical Intensive Care Unit of the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from December 2013 to July 2015. Seventy-eight mechanically ventilated patients considered for VE were prospectively included and divided into a low-GEF (<20%) and a near-normal-GEF (≥20%) group. Within each group, baseline hemodynamics, after PLR and after VE (250 ml 5% albumin over 30 min), were recorded. PLR-induced hemodynamic changes (PLR-Δ) were calculated. Fluid responders were defined by a 15% increase of stroke volume (SV) after VE.

RESULTS

Twenty-five out of 38 patients were responders in the GEF <20% group, compared to 26 out of 40 patients in the GEF ≥20% group. The thresholds of PLR-ΔSV and PLR-Δ cardiac output (PLR-ΔCO) for predicting fluid responsiveness were higher in the GEF ≥20% group than in the GEF <20% group (ΔSV: 12% vs. 8%; ΔCO: 7% vs. 6%), with increased sensitivity (ΔSV: 92% vs. 92%; ΔCO: 81% vs. 80%) and specificity (ΔSV: 86% vs. 70%; ΔCO: 86% vs. 77%), respectively. PLR-Δ heart rate could predict fluid responsiveness in the GEF ≥20% group with a threshold value of -5% (sensitivity 65%, specificity 93%) but could not in the GEF <20% group. The pressure index changes were poor predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

In the critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation, the diagnostic value of PLR for predicting fluid responsiveness depends on cardiac systolic function. Thus, cardiac systolic function must be considered when using PLR.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Register, ChiCTR-OCH-13004027; http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=5540.

Prediction of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients

Fluid administration is the first-line therapy in patients with acute circulatory failure. The main goal of fluid administration is to increase the cardiac output and ultimately the oxygen delivery. Nevertheless, the decision to administer fluids or not should be carefully considered, since half of critically ill patients are fluid unresponsive, and the deleterious effects of fluid overload clearly documented. Thus, except at the initial phase of hypovolemic or septic shock, where hypovolemia is constant and most of the patients responsive to the initial fluid resuscitation, it is of importance to test fluid responsiveness before administering fluids in critically ill patients. The static markers of cardiac preload cannot reliably predict fluid responsiveness, although they have been used for decades. To address this issue, some dynamic tests have been developed over the past years. All these tests consist in measuring the changes in cardiac output in response to the transient changes in cardiac preload that they induced. Most of these tests are based on the heart-lung interactions. The pulse pressure or stroke volume respiratory variations were first described, following by the respiratory variations of the vena cava diameter or of the internal jugular vein diameter. Nevertheless, all these tests are reliable only under strict conditions limiting their use in many clinical situations. Other tests such as passive leg raising or end-expiratory occlusion act as an internal volume challenge. To reliably predict fluid responsiveness, physicians must choose among these different dynamic tests, depending on their respective limitations and on the cardiac output monitoring technique which is used. In this review, we will summarize the most recent findings regarding the prediction of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients.

Cardiopulmonary monitoring of shock

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We will briefly review the classification of shock and the hallmark features of each subtype. Available modalities for monitoring shock patients will be discussed, along with evidence supporting the use, common pitfalls, and practical considerations of each method.

RECENT FINDINGS

As older, invasive monitoring methods such as the pulmonary artery catheter have fallen out of favor, newer technologies for cardiac output estimation, echocardiography, and noninvasive tests such as passive leg raising have gained popularity. Newer forms of minimally invasive or noninvasive monitoring (such as pulse contour analysis and chest bioreactance) show promise but will need further investigation before they are considered validated for practical use. There remains no 'ideal' test or standard of care for cardiopulmonary monitoring of shock patients.

SUMMARY

Shock has potentially reversible causes of morbidity and mortality if appropriately diagnosed and managed. Older methods of invasive monitoring have significant limitations but are still critical for managing shock in certain patients and settings. Newer methods are easier to employ, but further validation is needed. Multiple modalities along with careful clinical assessment are often useful in distinguishing shock subtypes. Best practice standards for monitoring should be based on institutional expertise.

Assessment of adequacy of volume resuscitation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

It has recently become evident that administration of intravenous fluids following initial resuscitation has a greater probability of producing tissue edema and hypoxemia than of increasing oxygen delivery. Therefore, it is essential to have a rational approach to assess the adequacy of volume resuscitation. Here we review passive leg raising (PLR) and respiratory variation in hemodynamics to assess fluid responsiveness.

RECENT FINDINGS

The use of ultrasound enhances the clinician's ability to detect and predict fluid responsiveness, whereas enthusiasm for this modality must be tempered by recent evidence that it is only reliable in apneic patients.

SUMMARY

The best predictor of fluid response for hypotensive patients not on vasopressors is a properly conducted passive leg raise maneuver. For more severely ill patients who are apneic, mechanically ventilated and on vasopressors, point of care echocardiography is the best choice. Increases in vena caval diameter induced by controlled positive pressure breaths are insensitive to arrhythmias and can be performed with relatively brief training. Most challenging are patients who are awake and on vasopressors; we suggest that the best method to discriminate fluid responders is PLR measuring changes in cardiac output.

Ultrasound stroke volume variation induced by passive leg raising and fluid responsiveness: An observational cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the performance of the ultrasound measurement of stroke volume (SV) coupled to passive leg raising (PLR) in predicting fluid responsiveness (FR).

DESIGN

A prospective cohort study was carried out in patients requiring volume expansion (VE). A transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTE) device was used for the measurement of SV. Four measurements were obtained: before and 90s after PLR, and before and after VE. The patients were subsequently classified according to their hemodynamic response to VE. Responders were defined by an increase in SV of at least 15% in response to VE.

RESULTS

Thirty maneuvers were studied. An increase in SV>15% in response to PLR was recorded in 21 cases. Hemodynamic indices taken in the first stage showed significant differences in the distensibility index of the inferior vena cava (dIVC), in the velocity-time integral of aortic blood flow (VTIAo) and in SV, with respective p-values of 0.009, 0.012 and 0.025. The SV changes induced by VE were significantly correlated to the SV changes induced by PLR, with a Spearman coefficient of 0.77 and a linear equation y=0.82 x+1.68. Fluid responsiveness can be efficiently predicted by assessing the effects of PLR on SV monitored by Doppler TTE, with a sensitivity of 94.7% and a negative predictive value of 88%.

CONCLUSION

Our data support the interest of Doppler TTE as an effective tool in predicting FR through the assessment of SV in response to PLR, in hemodynamically unstable patients.

Passive Leg-Raising and Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness: Systematic Review

Fluid boluses are often administered with the aim of improving tissue hypoperfusion in shock. However, only approximately 50% of patients respond to fluid administration with a clinically significant increase in stroke volume. Fluid overload can exacerbate pulmonary edema, precipitate respiratory failure, and prolong mechanical ventilation. Therefore, it is important to predict which hemodynamically unstable patients will increase their stroke volume in response to fluid administration, thereby avoiding deleterious effects. Passive leg-raising (lowering the head and upper torso from a 45° angle to lying supine [flat] while simultaneously raising the legs to a 45° angle) is a transient, reversible autotransfusion that simulates a fluid bolus and is performed to predict a response to fluid administration. The article reviews the accuracy, physiological effects, and factors affecting the response to passive-leg raising to predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients.

Passive Leg Raising: Simple and Reliable Technique to Prevent Fluid Overload in Critically ill Patients

Background:

Dynamic measures, the response to stroke volume (SV) to fluid loading, have been used successfully to guide fluid management decisions in critically ill patients. However, application of dynamic measures is often inaccurate to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with arrhythmias, ventricular dysfunction or spontaneously breathing critically ill patients. Passive leg raising (PLR) is a simple bedside maneuver that may provide an accurate alternative to guide fluid resuscitation in hypovolemic critically ill patients.

Methods:

Pertinent medical literature for fluid responsiveness in the critically ill patient published in English was searched over the past three decades, and then the search was extended as linked citations indicated.

Results:

Thirty-three studies including observational studies, randomized control trials, systemic review, and meta-analysis studies evaluating fluid responsiveness in the critically ill patient met selection criteria.

Conclusions:

PLR coupled with real-time SV monitors is considered a simple, noninvasive, and accurate method to determine fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients with high sensitivity and specificity for a 10% increase in SV. The adverse effect of albumin on the mortality of head trauma patients and chloride-rich crystalloids on mortality and kidney function needs to be considered when choosing the type of fluid for resuscitation.

Fluid responsiveness predicted by transcutaneous partial pressure of oxygen in patients with circulatory failure: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Significant effort has been devoted to defining parameters for predicting fluid responsiveness. Our goal was to study the feasibility of predicting fluid responsiveness by transcutaneous partial pressure of oxygen (PtcO₂) in the critically ill patients.

METHODS

This was a single-center prospective study conducted in the intensive care unit of a tertiary care teaching hospital. Shock patients who presented with at least one clinical sign of inadequate tissue perfusion, defined as systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg or a decrease >40 mmHg in previously hypertensive patients or the need for vasopressive drugs; urine output <0.5 ml/kg/h for 2 h; tachycardia; lactate >4 mmol/l, for less than 24 h in the absence of a contraindication for fluids were eligible to participate in the study. PtcO₂ was continuously recorded before and during a passive leg raising (PLR) test, and then before and after a 250 ml rapid saline infusion in 10 min. Fluid responsiveness is defined as a change in the stroke volume ≥10% after 250 ml of volume infusion.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were included, and 14 responded to volume expansion. In the responders, the mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure, cardiac output, stroke volume and PtcO₂ increased significantly, while the heart rate decreased significantly by both PLR and volume expansion. Changes in the stroke volume induced either by PLR or volume expansion were significantly greater in responders than in non-responders. The correlation between the changes in PtcO₂ and stroke volume induced by volume expansion was significant. Volume expansion induced an increase in the PtcO₂ of 14% and PLR induced an increase in PtcO₂ of 13% predicted fluid responsiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested the changes in PtcO₂ induced by volume expansion and a PLR test predicted fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. Trial registration NCT02083757.

Predictors to Intravenous Fluid Responsiveness

Management with intravenous fluids can improve cardiac output in some surgical patients. Management with static preload indicators, such as central venous pressure and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, has not demonstrated a suitable relationship with changes in the cardiac output induced by intravenous fluid therapy. Dynamic indicators, such as the variability of arterial pulse pressure or stroke volume variation, have demonstrated a suitable relationship. Since improvement in cardiac output does not guarantee an adequate perfusion pressure, in patients with hypotension, it is also necessary to know whether arterial pressure will also increase with intravenous fluid therapy. In this regard, the functional assessment of arterial load by dynamic arterial elastance could help to determine which patients will improve not only their cardiac output but also their mean arterial pressure.

Predictors to Intravenous Fluid Responsiveness

Management with intravenous fluids can improve cardiac output in some surgical patients. Management with static preload indicators, such as central venous pressure and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, has not demonstrated a suitable relationship with changes in the cardiac output induced by intravenous fluid therapy. Dynamic indicators, such as the variability of arterial pulse pressure or stroke volume variation, have demonstrated a suitable relationship. Since improvement in cardiac output does not guarantee an adequate perfusion pressure, in patients with hypotension, it is also necessary to know whether arterial pressure will also increase with intravenous fluid therapy. In this regard, the functional assessment of arterial load by dynamic arterial elastance could help to determine which patients will improve not only their cardiac output but also their mean arterial pressure.

Prediction of fluid responsiveness: an update

In patients with acute circulatory failure, the decision to give fluids or not should not be taken lightly. The risk of overzealous fluid administration has been clearly established. Moreover, volume expansion does not always increase cardiac output as one expects. Thus, after the very initial phase and/or if fluid losses are not obvious, predicting fluid responsiveness should be the first step of fluid strategy. For this purpose, the central venous pressure as well as other “static” markers of preload has been used for decades, but they are not reliable. Robust evidence suggests that this traditional use should be abandoned. Over the last 15 years, a number of dynamic tests have been developed. These tests are based on the principle of inducing short-term changes in cardiac preload, using heart–lung interactions, the passive leg raise or by the infusion of small volumes of fluid, and to observe the resulting effect on cardiac output. Pulse pressure and stroke volume variations were first developed, but they are reliable only under strict conditions. The variations in vena caval diameters share many limitations of pulse pressure variations. The passive leg-raising test is now supported by solid evidence and is more frequently used. More recently, the end-expiratory occlusion test has been described, which is easily performed in ventilated patients. Unlike the traditional fluid challenge, these dynamic tests do not lead to fluid overload. The dynamic tests are complementary, and clinicians should choose between them based on the status of the patient and the cardiac output monitoring technique. Several methods and tests are currently available to identify preload responsiveness. All have some limitations, but they are frequently complementary. Along with elements indicating the risk of fluid administration, they should help clinicians to take the decision to administer fluids or not in a reasoned way.

Fluid responsiveness prediction using Vigileo FloTrac measured cardiac output changes during passive leg raise test

Background

Passive leg raising (PLR) is a so called self-volume challenge used to test for fluid responsiveness. Changes in cardiac output (CO) or stroke volume (SV) measured during PLR are used to predict the need for subsequent fluid loading. This requires a device that can measure CO changes rapidly. The Vigileo™ monitor, using third-generation software, allows continuous CO monitoring. The aim of this study was to compare changes in CO (measured with the Vigileo device) during a PLR manoeuvre to calculate the accuracy for predicting fluid responsiveness.

Methods

This is a prospective study in a 20-bedded mixed general critical care unit in a large non-university regional referral hospital. Fluid responders were defined as having an increase in CO of greater than 15 % following a fluid challenge. Patients meeting the criteria for circulatory shock with a Vigileo™ monitor (Vigileo™; FloTrac; Edwards™; Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) already in situ, and assessed as requiring volume expansion by the clinical team based on clinical criteria, were included. All patients underwent a PLR manoeuvre followed by a fluid challenge.

Results

Data was collected and analysed on stroke volume variation (SVV) at baseline and CO and SVV changes during the PLR manoeuvre and following a subsequent fluid challenge in 33 patients. The majority had septic shock. Patient characteristics, baseline haemodynamic variables and baseline vasoactive infusion requirements were similar between fluid responders (10 patients) and non-responders (23 patients). Peak increase in CO occurred within 120 s during the PLR in all cases. Using an optimal cut point of 9 % increase in CO during the PLR produced an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85 (95 % CI 0.63 to 1.00) with a sensitivity of 80 % (95 % CI 44 to 96 %) and a specificity of 91 % (95 % CI 70 to 98 %).

Conclusions

CO changes measured by the Vigileo™ monitor using third-generation software during a PLR test predict fluid responsiveness in mixed medical and surgical patients with vasopressor-dependent circulatory shock.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40560-016-0188-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Echocardiography as a guide for fluid management

Background

In critically ill patients at risk for organ failure, the administration of intravenous fluids has equal chances of resulting in benefit or harm. While the intent of intravenous fluid is to increase cardiac output and oxygen delivery, unwelcome results in those patients who do not increase their cardiac output are tissue edema, hypoxemia, and excess mortality. Here we briefly review bedside methods to assess fluid responsiveness, focusing upon the strengths and pitfalls of echocardiography in spontaneously breathing mechanically ventilated patients as a means to guide fluid management. We also provide new data to help clinicians anticipate bedside echocardiography findings in vasopressor-dependent, volume-resuscitated patients.

Objective

To review bedside ultrasound as a method to judge whether additional intravenous fluid will increase cardiac output. Special emphasis is placed on the respiratory effort of the patient.

Conclusions

Point-of-care echocardiography has the unique ability to screen for unexpected structural findings while providing a quantifiable probability of a patient’s cardiovascular response to fluids. Measuring changes in stroke volume in response to either passive leg raising or changes in thoracic pressure during controlled mechanical ventilation offer good performance characteristics but may be limited by operator skill, arrhythmia, and open lung ventilation strategies. Measuring changes in vena caval diameter induced by controlled mechanical ventilation demands less training of the operator and performs well during arrythmia. In modern delivery of critical care, however, most patients are nursed awake, even during mechanical ventilation. In patients making respiratory efforts we suggest that ventilator settings must be standardized before assessing this promising technology as a guide for fluid management.

The assessment of circulating volume using inferior vena cava collapse index and carotid Doppler velocity time integral in healthy volunteers: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Assessment of circulating volume and the requirement for fluid replacement are fundamental to resuscitation but remain largely empirical. Passive leg raise (PLR) may determine fluid responders while avoiding potential fluid overload. We hypothesised that inferior vena cava collapse index (IVCCI) and carotid artery blood flow would change predictably in response to PLR, potentially providing a non-invasive tool to assess circulating volume and identifying fluid responsive patients.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective proof of concept pilot study on fasted healthy volunteers. One operator measured IVC diameter during quiet respiration and sniff, and carotid artery flow. Stroke volume (SV) was also measured using suprasternal Doppler. Our primary endpoint was change in IVCCI after PLR. We also studied changes in IVCCI after "sniff", and correlation between carotid artery flow and SV.

RESULTS

Passive leg raise was associated with significant reduction in the mean inferior vena cava collapsibility index from 0.24 to 0.17 (p < 0.01). Mean stroke volume increased from 56.0 to 69.2 mL (p < 0.01). There was no significant change in common carotid artery blood flow. Changes in physiology consequent upon passive leg raise normalised rapidly.

DISCUSSION

Passive leg raise is associated with a decrease of IVCCI and increase in stroke volume. However, the wide range of values observed suggests that factors other than circulating volume predominate in determining the proportion of collapse with respiration.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to other studies, we did not find that carotid blood flow increased with passive leg raise. Rapid normalisation of post-PLR physiology may account for this.

Assessment of fluid responsiveness with end-tidal carbon dioxide using a simplified passive leg raising maneuver: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Assessing fluid responsiveness is important in the management of patients with hemodynamic instability. Passive leg raising (PLR) is a validated dynamic method to induce a transient increase in cardiac preload and predict fluid responsiveness. Variations in end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) obtained by capnography correlate closely with variations in cardiac output when alveolar ventilation and carbon dioxide production are kept constant. In this prospective observational study, we tested the hypothesis that variations in ETCO2 induced by a simplified PLR maneuver can track changes in the cardiac index (CI) and thus predict fluid responsiveness.

METHOD

A five-minute standardized PLR maneuver was performed in 90 paralyzed hemodynamically stable cardiac surgical patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Cardiac index was measured by thermodilution before and one minute after PLR. End-tidal CO2 measurements using capnography were obtained during the entire PLR maneuver. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a 15% increase in the CI. The Chi square test and Student's t test were used to compare responders and non-responders. Logistic regression analyses were then performed to determine factors of responsiveness.

RESULTS

There were no differences between responders and non-responders in demographic and baseline hemodynamic variables. Fluid responsiveness was associated with an ETCO2 variation (ΔETCO2) of ≥ 2 mmHg during PLR [odds ratio (OR), 7.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.7 to 20.2; P < 0.01; sensitivity 75%]. A low positive predictive value (54%) and a high negative predictive value (NPV) (86%) were observed. No other clinical or hemodynamic predictors were associated with fluid responsiveness. A logistic regression model established that a combination of ΔETCO2 ≥ 2 mmHg and a change in systolic blood pressure ≥ 10 mmHg induced by passive leg raising was predictive of fluid responsiveness (OR, 8.9; 95% CI, 2.5 to 32.2; P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Use of a passive leg raising maneuver to induce variation in ETCO2 is a noninvasive and useful method to assess fluid responsiveness in paralyzed cardiac surgery patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Given its high NPV, fluid responsiveness is unlikely if a passive leg raising maneuver induces ΔETCO2 of < 2 mmHg.

The effects of passive leg raising and ultrafiltration stopping on blood pressure in hemodialysis patients

PURPOSE

Hemodialysis-associated hypotension, one of the more serious issues in hemodialysis patients, can be treated by passive leg raising (PLR) and ultrafiltration (UF) stopping. We investigated the effects of PLR and UF stopping on blood pressure in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

The study was conducted in 76 end-stage renal disease patients. After the second hour of dialysis, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) of the patients who did not develop intradialytic hypotension (IDH) were measured in the supine position. Thereafter, PLR was performed by raising the legs 20°; and after 3 min, SBP and DBP were measured again. UF was then stopped in the PLR position; SBP and DBP were repeated 3 min later. The same procedure was performed during IDH in the patients that developed IDH.

RESULTS

A mean 5-mmHg (p < 0.05) increase in SBP and a mean 2-mmHg increase in DBP (p < 0.05) were observed by PLR in the supine position. UF stopping during PLR increased SBP by a mean of 1 mmHg (p < 0.05) while no change was observed in DBP (p = ns). IDH occurred in 19 (25 %) patients. PLR positioning increases SBP and DBP by a mean of 8 mmHg (p < 0.05) and 3 mmHg (p < 0.05), respectively, in the supine position during IDH. During IDH, UF stopping in the PLR position did not significantly increase SBP and DBP in patients as compared to the PLR position.

CONCLUSIONS

SBP and DBP increase during PLR. UF stopping during PLR does not lead to a higher increase in blood pressure as compared to PLR positioning.

Effects of Ischemic Reperfusion Injury and Remote Conditioning on Passive Leg Raising-Induced Brachial-Artery Dilation

<b><i>Objectives:</i></b> Passive leg raising (PLR) has been proposed to assess arterial vasodilator reserve and possibly endothelial function. Since endothelial function is sensitive to ischemic-reperfusion (I-R) injury, we determined the effects of I-R injury and ischemic conditioning on PLR-induced brachial-artery dilation (BAD), i.e. PLR-BAD. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We induced PLR-BAD before and after ipsilateral arm I-R injury (7.5 min of occlusion) in 20 healthy males aged 29 ± 6 years. The protocol was repeated in combination with remote conditioning stimuli (3 × 30 s of contralateral arm occlusions). <b><i>Results:</i></b> PLR resulted in significant BAD (3.85%, p < 0.001) before but not after prolonged ischemia (0.25%, p = 0.38). I-R injury, along with either preischemic or postischemic conditioning restored the PLR-BAD response (before: 3.11%, p < 0.001 and after: 3.74%, p < 0.001). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> I-R injury blunts the BAD induced by PLR. Remote pre- and postconditioning restore this response. These findings are similar to those previously reported using hyperemia and ultrasound to assess BAD.