Symptom relief after large-volume thoracentesis in the absence of lung perfusion

The effect of pleural drainage on pulse oximetry in a post-operative thoracic surgery population

BACKGROUND

Pleural effusions in post-operative thoracic surgery patients are common. Effusions can result in prolonged hospitalizations or readmissions, with prior studies suggesting mixed effects of pleural drainage on hypoxia. We aimed to define the impact of pleural drainage on pulse oximetry (SpO2) in post-thoracic surgery patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study of post-operative thoracic surgery patients undergoing pleural drainage was performed. SpO2 and supplemental oxygen (FiO2) values were recorded at pre- and post-procedure. The primary outcome was difference in pre-procedural and post-procedural SpO2.

RESULTS

We identified 95 patients with a mean age of 65 (SD - 13.8) years undergoing 122 pleural drainage procedures. Mean drainage volume was 619 (SD-423) mL and the majority of procedures (88.5 %) included a drainage of <1000 mL. SpO2 was associated with an increase from 94.0 % (SD-2.6) to 97.3 % (SD-2.0) at 24-h (p < 0.0001). FiO2 was associated with a decrease from 0.31 (SD-0.15) to 0.29 (SD-0.12) at 24-h (p = 0.0081). SpO2/FiO2 was associated with an increase from 344.5 (SD-99.0) to 371.9 (SD-94.7) at 24-h post-procedure (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pleural drainage within post-operative thoracic surgery patients offers statistically significant improvements in oxygen saturation by peripheral pulse oximetry and oxygen supplementation; however the clinical significance of these changes remains unclear. Pleural drainage itself may be requested for numerous reasons, including diagnostic (fevers, leukocytosis, etc.) or therapeutic (worsening dyspnea) evaluation. However, pleural drainage may offer minimal clinical impact on pulse oximetry in post-operative thoracic surgery patients.

The Impact of Thoracentesis On Postprocedure Pulse Oximetry

BACKGROUND

Although thoracentesis can offer considerable symptomatic relief to the patient, its physiologic impact on oxygen saturation has not been well established in the literature. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of thoracentesis on postprocedure pulse oximetry (SpO2) in an inpatient population.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients undergoing thoracentesis from January 2012 to November 2017 was performed. Inclusion criteria were age above 18 and thoracentesis performed in an inpatient setting. Records were reviewed for patient demographics, procedure reports, and laboratory values. SpO2 and FiO2 values were collected before and 6 and 24 hours postprocedure. Multivariable linear regression models were used to evaluate for changes in SpO2 and SpO2/FiO2. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, serum hemoglobin, effusion etiology, volume removed, nonexpandable lung physiology and procedural complications and FiO2.

RESULTS

A total of 502 patients were included. The mean (SD) age was 60 (14) years, and 53.4% of the patients were male. The most common cause of pleural effusion was malignant effusion (37%). The median (interquartile range) volume of fluid removed was 1400 (1000 to 2000) mL and nonexpandable lung physiology was noted in 35%. There was no significant within-subject difference in 24 hours postprocedure SpO2 compared with preprocedure SpO2. In multivariable analysis, there was a small increase in 24-hour postprocedure SpO2 [β=0.31, 95% confidence interval (0.22, 0.41), P<0.01] and a similar small increase in 24-hour postprocedure SpO2/FiO2 [β=0.84, 95% confidence interval: (0.68, 1.01), P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Among inpatients undergoing thoracentesis, there is no clinically significant change in SpO2 or SpO2/FiO2 at 24-hours post-procedure compared to pre-procedural SpO2 or SpO2/FiO2.

Pleural cerebrospinal fluid shunting causing trapped lung: A respiratory physician's approach to management and prevention

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting into the pleural space can cause complications such as long-standing pleural effusions and trapped lung. These complications can be difficult to manage due to the propensity of effusions to recur, and the irreversible nature of trapped lung. This report describes the case of a woman with a pleural CSF shunt who developed chronic pleural effusions and trapped lung over two years, following a 24-year period without any respiratory shunt complications. Management options for this patient included thoracentesis, lung decortication, insertion of an indwelling pleural catheter, and shunt revision. Advocating for pleural shunt revision when symptomatic or increasingly large pleural effusions occur may prevent the development of trapped lung.

Thoracentesis

Pleural effusions are common and account for high morbidity and mortality in a range of patients. Thoracentesis can provide significant symptom relief and improvement in physiologic parameters including dyspnea, exercise, and sleep. Recent advances, including the use of ultrasound and dedicated procedural teams, have improved the safety of thoracentesis. This has allowed thoracentesis to be performed on higher-risk individuals including those with elevated bleeding risk and bilateral pleural effusions. This review will summarize recent advances in thoracentesis procedural safety, symptom relief following thoracentesis, and understanding of the physiologic basis for such improvements.

Release of growth factors after mechanical and chemical pleurodesis for treatment of malignant pleural effusion: a randomized control study

Background

Growth factors are key inducers of fibrosis but can also mediate inflammatory responses resulting in increasing pleural effusion and acute respiratory distress syndrome. The primary aim of the study was to analyse growth factors release after performing chemical and mechanical pleurodesis in the first 48 hours at the patients with malignant pleural effusion. The secondary endpoints were to evaluate the effectiveness of the both pleurodeses, symptoms release and the quality of life of patients after the treatment.

Patients and methods.

A prospective randomized study included 36 consecutive female patients with breast carcinoma and malignant pleural effusion in an intention-to-treat analysis. We treated 18 patients by means of thoracoscopic mechanical pleurodesis and 18 patients by chemical pleurodesis with talcum applied over a chest tube. We gathered the pleural fluid and serum samples in the following 48 hours under a dedicated protocol and tested them for growth factors levels. A quality of life and visual analogue pain score surveys were also performed.

Results

Median measured serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) level after chemical pleurodesis was 930.68 pg/ml (95% CI: 388.22–4656.65) and after mechanical pleurodesis 808.54 pg/ml. (95% CI: 463.20-1235.13) (p = 0.103). Median pleural levels of transforming growth factor (TGF) β1 were higher after performing mechanical pleurodesis (4814.00 pg/ml [95% CI: 2726.51–7292.94]) when compared to those after performing chemical pleurodesis (1976.50 pg/ml [95% CI: 1659.82–5136.26]) (p = 0.078). We observed similar results for fibroblast growth factor (FGF) β; the serum level was higher after mechanical pleurodesis (30.45 pg/ml [95% CI: 20.40–59.42]), compared to those after chemical pleurodesis (13.39 pg/ml [95% CI: 5.04 – 74.60]) (p = 0.076). Mechanical pleurodesis was equally effective as chemical pleurodesis in terms of hospital stay, pleural effusion re-accumulation, requiring of additional thoracentesis, median overall survival, but, it shortened the mean thoracic drainage duration (p = 0.030) and resulted in a higher symptoms release and in a better quality of life (p = 0.047).

Conclusions

We recorded an increase in serum VEGF levels after chemical pleurodesis, however on the contrary, an increase in the pleural fluid level of TGFβ1 and FGFβ] after mechanical pleurodesis with respect to compared group. Although the differences did not reach statistical significance, VEGF, TGFβ1 and FGFβ remain the most interesting parameters for future research. Considering the mechanisms of growth factors action, we conclude that in our study group mechanical pleurodesis might be more efficient in terms of growth factors release, thoracic drainage duration and resulted in a higher symptoms release and in a better quality of life than chemical pleurodesis.

CT volumetric analysis of pleural effusions: a comparison with thoracentesis volumes

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this study was to compare computed tomography (CT) volumetric analysis of pleural effusions with thoracentesis volumes. The secondary objective of this study was to compare subjective grading of pleural effusion size with thoracentesis volumes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 67 patients with free-flowing pleural effusions who underwent therapeutic thoracentesis. CT volumetric analysis was performed on all patients; the CT volumes were compared with the thoracentesis volumes. In addition, the subjective grading of pleural effusion size was compared with the thoracentesis volumes.

RESULTS

The average difference between CT volume and thoracentesis volume was 9.4 mL (1.3%) ± 290 mL (30%); these volumes were not statistically different (P = .79, paired two-tailed Student's t-test). The thoracentesis volume of a "small," "moderate," and "large" pleural effusion, as graded on chest CT, was found to be approximately 410 ± 260 cc, 770 ± 270 mL and 1370 ± 650 mL, respectively; the thoracentesis volume of a "small," "moderate," and "large" pleural effusion, as graded on chest radiograph, was found to be approximately 610 ± 320 mL, 1040 ± 460 mL, and 1530 ± 830 mL, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CT volumetric analysis is an accessible tool that can be used to accurately quantify the size of pleural effusions.