Assessment of EGFR mutation status using cell-free DNA from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

Evaluating personalized circulating tumor DNA detection for early-stage lung cancer

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been widely used as a minimally invasive biomarker in clinical routine. However, a number of factors such as panel design, sample quality, patients' disease stages are known to influence ctDNA detection sensitivity. In this study, we systematically evaluated common factors associated with the variability of ctDNA detection in plasma and investigated ctDNA abundance in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Whole exome profiling was conducted on 61 tumor tissue samples to identify tumor-specific variants, which were then used to design personalized assay MarRyDa® for ctDNA detection. DNA extracted from BAL fluid and plasma were genotyped using MarRyDa® platform. Our analysis showed that histological subtypes and disease stages had significant differences in ctDNA detection rate. Furthermore, we found that DNA purified from BAL supernatants contains the highest levels of ctDNA compared with BAL precipitates and plasma; therefore, utilizing BAL supernatants for tumor detection might provide additional benefits. Finally, we demonstrated that tumor cellularity played significant roles in the design of personalized ctDNA panel which eventually impacts ctDNA detection sensitivity. We suggest setting a flexible criteria for sample quality control and utilization of BAL might benefit more patients in clinics.

Biomarkers in the management of lung cancer: changing the practice of thoracic oncology

Lung cancer currently represents a leading cause of cancer death. Substantial progress achieved in the medical therapy of lung cancer during the last decade has been associated with the advent of targeted therapy, including immunotherapy. The targeted therapy has gradually shifted from drugs suppressing general mechanisms of tumor growth and progression to agents aiming at transforming mechanisms like driver mutations in a particular tumor. Knowledge of the molecular characteristics of a tumor has become an essential component of the more targeted therapeutic approach. There are specific challenges for biomarker determination in lung cancer, in particular a commonly limited size of tumor sample. Liquid biopsy is therefore of particular importance in the management of lung cancer. Laboratory medicine is an indispensable part of multidisciplinary management of lung cancer. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) has played and will continue playing a major role in updating and spreading the knowledge in the field.

Concordance of Cytological Specimens with Histological Tissue for Detection of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

There is increasing need for more testing in non-small cell lung cancer given the introduction of newer targeted therapies. Cytological specimens including conventional smears (CS), cell blocks (CB), and liquid-based cytology (LBC) are an alternative to histologic tissue (HT) specimens in detecting EGFR mutations, but the concordance of these 2 specimens is yet to be determined. The aim of the present systematic review is to determine the concordance rates between different cytologic specimens with HT in detecting EGFR mutations.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were utilized in the primary search, along with reference lists of electronically retrieved full-text articles. Concordance rates were pooled together if 2 or more studies reporting the same type of cytologic specimen were available.

RESULTS

Overall, 15 studies were included in this review, with 13 studies included in the pooled analysis. There was an overall concordance rate of 92.8% in 593 paired cytologic and HT specimens, with LBC having the highest concordance rate of 96.0%, followed by CS and CB, each with a concordance rate of 95.8%, although the concordance rate of CS and/or CB was lower at 90.6% with a larger pool of studies. LBC was found to have a significantly higher concordance rate than CS and/or CB.

CONCLUSION

Cytological specimens have a high concordance rate in detecting EGFR mutations, when compared to HT. LBC has shown superior concordance rates compared to CS and CB. Cytological specimens should be considered as an additional and alternative source of diagnostic material for EGFR testing.

EGFR mutation status yield from bronchoalveolar lavage in patients with primary pulmonary adenocarcinoma compared to a venous blood sample and tissue biopsy

Background

In recent years, there has been a revolution in the genomic profiling and molecular typing of lung cancer. A key oncogene is the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The gold standard for determining EGFR mutation status is tissue biopsy, where a histological specimen is taken by a bronchoscopic or surgical method (transbronchial biopsy, forceps biopsy, etc.). However, in clinical practice the tissue sample is often insufficient for morphological and molecular analysis. Bronchoalveolar lavage is a validated diagnostic method for pathogenic infections in the lower respiratory tract, yet its diagnostic value for oncogenic mutation testing in lung cancer has not been extensively investigated. This study aims to compare the prevalence of EGFR mutation status in bronchoalveolar lavage and peripheral blood referring to the gold standard - tissue biopsy in patients with primary lung adenocarcinoma.

Methods

Twenty-six patients with adenocarcinoma were examined for EGFR mutation from tissue biopsy, peripheral blood sample and bronchoalveolar lavage.

Results

Thirteen patients had wild type EGFR and the other 13 had EGFR mutation. EGFR mutation from a peripheral blood sample was identified in 38.5% (5/13) of patients, whereas EGFR mutation obtained from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was identified in 92.3% (12/13). This study demonstrates that a liquid biopsy sample for EGFR status from BAL has a higher sensitivity compared to a venous blood sample.

Bronchial Washing Fluid Versus Plasma and Bronchoscopy Biopsy Samples for Detecting Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Status in Lung Cancer

Background

Bronchial washing fluid (BWF) is a common specimen collected during bronchoscopy and has been suggested to contain both tumor cells and cell-free DNA. However, there is no consensus on the feasibility of BWF in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) genetic analysis because of the limited sample size and varying results in previous studies. This study compared the feasibility, sensitivity, and specificity of detecting EGFR mutation using BWF, bronchoscopy biopsy, and plasma samples in patients with lung cancer (LC).

Materials and Methods

A total of 144 patients (110 with LC and 34 without LC) were enrolled in the study. During diagnostic bronchoscopy for suspected LC lesions, bronchial washing with saline was performed directly or through a guide sheath. BWF was collected as well as paired bronchoscopy biopsy and plasma samples, and EGFR mutation testing was performed via highly sensitive blocker polymerase chain reaction. The EGFR mutation status of histologic samples was set as the standard reference.

Results

Compared with the histologic samples, the sensitivity, specificity, and concordance rate of EGFR mutation detected in BWF samples were 92.5%, 100%, and 97.9%, respectively. Moreover, BWF showed a higher sensitivity in EGFR mutation testing than both plasma (100% [8/8] vs. 62.5% [5/8], p = 0.095) and bronchoscopy biopsy samples (92.5% [37/40] vs. 77.5% [31/40], p = 0.012) and identified EGFR mutations in 6 cases whose biopsy failed to establish an LC diagnosis. The diameter of the target lesion and its contact degree with BWF were positive predictive factors for EGFR testing results.

Conclusions

BWF yields a high sensitivity in EGFR mutation testing, having high concordance with histologic samples, and presenting the benefit of rapid EGFR mutation detection in LC patients.

Technical and Methodological Aspects of Cell-Free Nucleic Acids Analyzes

Analyzes of cell-free nucleic acids (cfNAs) have shown huge potential in many biomedical applications, gradually entering several fields of research and everyday clinical care. Many biological properties of cfNAs can be informative to gain deeper insights into the function of the organism, such as their different types (DNA, RNAs) and subtypes (gDNA, mtDNA, bacterial DNA, miRNAs, etc.), forms (naked or vesicle bound NAs), fragmentation profiles, sequence composition, epigenetic modifications, and many others. On the other hand, the workflows of their analyzes comprise many important steps, from sample collection, storage and transportation, through extraction and laboratory analysis, up to bioinformatic analyzes and statistical evaluations, where each of these steps has the potential to affect the outcome and informational value of the performed analyzes. There are, however, no universal or standard protocols on how to exactly proceed when analyzing different cfNAs for different applications, at least according to our best knowledge. We decided therefore to prepare an overview of the available literature and products commercialized for cfNAs processing, in an attempt to summarize the benefits and limitations of the currently available approaches, devices, consumables, and protocols, together with various factors influencing the workflow, its processes, and outcomes.

Molecular testing on bronchial washings for the diagnosis and predictive assessment of lung cancer

Cytopathological analyses of bronchial washings (BWs) collected during fibre‐optic bronchoscopy are often inconclusive for lung cancer diagnosis. To address this issue, we assessed the suitability of conducting molecular analyses on BWs, with the aim to improve the diagnosis and outcome prediction of lung cancer. The methylation status of RASSF1A, CDH1, DLC1 and PRPH was analysed in BW samples from 91 lung cancer patients and 31 controls, using a novel two‐colour droplet digital methylation‐specific PCR (ddMSP) technique. Mutations in ALK, BRAF, EGFR, ERBB2, KRAS, MAP2K1, MET, NRAS, PIK3CA, ROS1 and TP53 and gene fusions of ALK, RET and ROS1 were also investigated, using next‐generation sequencing on 73 lung cancer patients and 14 tumour‐free individuals. Our four‐gene methylation panel had significant diagnostic power, with 97% sensitivity and 74% specificity (relative risk, 7.3; odds ratio, 6.1; 95% confidence interval, 12.7–127). In contrast, gene mutation analysis had a remarkable value for predictive, but not for diagnostic, purposes. Actionable mutations in EGFR, HER2 and ROS1 as well as in other cancer genes (KRAS, PIK3CA and TP53) were detected. Concordance with gene mutations uncovered in tumour biopsies was higher than 90%. In addition, bronchial‐washing analyses permitted complete patient coverage and the detection of additional actionable mutations. In conclusion, BWs are a useful material on which to perform molecular tests based on gene panels: aberrant gene methylation and mutation analyses could be performed as approaches accompanying current diagnostic and predictive assays during the initial workup phase. This study establishes the grounds for further prospective investigation.

Compared to plasma, bronchial washing fluid shows higher diagnostic yields for detecting EGFR-TKI sensitizing mutations by ddPCR in lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The rate of diagnosis of advanced lung adenocarcinoma must be improved. In this study, we compared the detection rates of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor-sensitizing mutations (mEGFRs) in bronchial washing fluid (BWF) and the plasma of patients with lung adenocarcinoma using the tissue genotype as the standard reference.

METHODS

Paired blood and BWF specimens were collected from 73 patients with lung cancer. The tumor EGFR mutation status was determined by genotyping of the plasma and BWF samples using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR).

RESULTS

The study cohort included 26, 10, 10, and 27 patients with stage I, II, III, and IV disease. Of the 73 cases, 35 had a wild-type EGFR, and 19 had the L858R substitution and exon 19 deletion mutations. The areas under the receiver operator characteristic curves for sensitivity vs. specificity of ddPCR were 0.895 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.822-0.969] for BWF and 0.686 (95% CI: 0.592-0.780) for plasma (p < 0.001). The fractional abundance was higher in BWF of the mEGFR-positive cases than in the plasma (p = 0.004), facilitating easy threshold setting and discrimination between mEGFR-positive and negative cases. When genotyping results obtained using plasma and BWF were compared for early lung cancer (stages I-IIIA), the diagnostic yields were significantly higher for BWF ddPCR, and the same tendency was observed for the advanced stages, suggesting that the BWF data may reflect the genotype status in early-stage patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The mEGFR genotyping results obtained using BWF showed a higher diagnostic efficacy than did those obtained using the plasma. Thus, BWF-based genotyping may be a useful substitute for that using plasma in lung cancer.

Comparison of PANAMutyper and PNAClamp for Detecting KRAS Mutations from Patients With Malignant Pleural Effusion

BACKGROUND/AIM

KRAS is one of the frequently mutated genes in human cancers and often relates with drug resistance and poor prognosis. PANAMutyper™ is a novel technology that integrates PNAClamp™ and PANA S-Melting™. In the present study, PANAMutyper™ and PNAClamp™ were compared for the detection of KRAS mutations using different samples of patients with malignant pleural effusion.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 103 patients (including 56 lung adenocarcinoma, 10 lung squamous carcinoma, 17 small cell lung cancer, 3 large cell lung cancer, 3 stomach cancer, 2 ovarian cancer, and others) with malignant pleural effusion were investigated using matched tumor tissue, cell block, and pleural effusion samples. The diagnostic performance of these two methods was compared.

RESULTS

KRAS mutations were detected in 18 (17.5%) of 103 patients using tissue, cell block, and pleural effusion samples. All 18 patients with KRAS mutations were detected by PANAMutyper™ using any sample type, however, only 7 cases were detected by PNAClamp™. Among the subtypes of KRAS mutations, substitution in codon 12, 35G>T was the most frequent, followed by substitution in codon 12, 35G>A and codon 12, 34G>A. In pleural effusion specimens, PANAMutyper™ showed a better diagnostic performance compared to PNAClamp™.

CONCLUSION

PANAMutyper™ had a diagnostic superiority for the detection of KRAS mutations in patients with malignant pleural effusion compared to PNAClamp™, although there was a concordance between PANAMutyper™ and PNAClamp™ results. Therefore, PANAMutyper™ can be used for a more sensitive and accurate detection of KRAS mutations.

Feasibility of Bronchial Washing Fluid-Based Approach to Early-Stage Lung Cancer Diagnosis

A blood-based approach such as circulating tumor DNA remains challenging in diagnosis for early-stage disease. Bronchial washing (BW) is a minimally invasive procedure that yields fluids that may contain tumor DNA. Therefore, we prospectively enrolled 12 patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer without endoscopically visible tumors. Somatic mutations were analyzed using ultra-deep next-generation sequencing in 48 paired specimens (primary tumor tissue, normal tissue, BW supernatant, and BW precipitate). In primary tumors, 130 missense mutations/indels (5-16 per patient) and 20 driver mutations (0-3 per patient) were found. Concordance of driver mutations between BW fluids and primary tumors was 95.0%. The allele frequencies for missense mutations/indels in BW supernatants significantly correlated with those in primary tumors and were higher than those in BW precipitates. These findings suggest that BW supernatants are reflective of tumor-associated mutations and could be used for early-stage lung cancer diagnosis.

[Progress in Non-invasive Detection of EGFR Mutation in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

在过去的十年里，癌症患者的管理模式已经逐渐转向为基于分子突变检测的个体化模式。表皮生长因子受体（epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR）基因突变是非小细胞肺癌（non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC）的重要驱动因素，针对EGFR的靶向治疗和传统化疗相比，显示出显著的安全性和有效性。然而，并不是所有的EGFR突变患者都可接受EGFR靶向治疗，不同的突变类型往往预示着不同的临床结局，如敏感性突变EGFR 19-Del、L858R和耐药性突变20ins。此外，如今已经开发出第三代TKI药物Osimertinib（AZD9291）和Rociletinib（CO-1686）可使因EGFR T790M突变，导致初代TKI耐药的患者进一步获益。因此，治疗前了解患者EGFR突变状态，治疗过程中持续监测耐药基因EGFR T790M突变情况，对NSCLC患者靶向药物的管理有着重要的意义。最近几年来，“液体活检”技术得到快速的发展，让我们看到采用非侵入性方法以实时监测耐药性突变成为现实的可能。在本综述中，我们回顾了NSCLC中检测EGFR突变的多种非侵入性检测技术在不同液体样本的临床应用。

Rapid point-of-care testing for epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in patients with lung cancer using cell-free DNA from cytology specimen supernatants

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are associated with responses to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our previous study revealed a rapid point-of-care system for detecting EGFR mutations. This system analyzes cell pellets from cytology specimens using droplet-polymerase chain reaction (d-PCR), and has a reaction time of 10 min. The present study aimed to validate the performance of the EGFR d-PCR assay using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from supernatants obtained from cytology specimens. Assay results from cfDNA supernatant analyses were compared with those from cell pellets for 90 patients who were clinically diagnosed with, or suspected of having, lung cancer (80 bronchial lavage fluid samples, nine pleural effusion samples and one spinal fluid sample). EGFR mutations were identified in 12 and 15 cases using cfDNA supernatants and cell pellets, respectively. The concordance rates between cfDNA-supernatant and cell‑pellet assay results were 96.7% [kappa coefficient (K)=0.87], 98.9% (K=0.94), 98.9% (K=0.79) and 98.9% (K=0.79) for total EGFR mutations, L858R, E746_A750del and T790M, respectively. All 15 patients with EGFR mutation-positive results, as determined by EGFR d-PCR assay using cfDNA supernatants or cell pellets, also displayed positive results by conventional EGFR assays using tumor tissue or cytology specimens. Notably, EGFR mutations were even detected in five cfDNA supernatants for which the cytological diagnoses of the corresponding cell pellets were 'suspicious for malignancy', 'atypical' or 'negative for malignancy.' In conclusion, this rapid point-of-care system may be considered a promising novel screening method that may enable patients with NSCLC to receive EGFR-TKI therapy more rapidly, whilst also reserving cell pellets for additional morphological and molecular analyses.

miR-185 and miR-29a are similarly expressed in the bronchoalveolar lavage cells in IPF and lung cancer but common targets DNMT1 and COL1A1 show disease specific patterns

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and lung cancer (LC) constitute two progressively devastating lung diseases with common risk factors including aging and smoking. There is an increasing interest in the investigation of common pathogenic mechanisms between IPF and LC with therapeutic implications. Several oncomirs, microRNAs associated with malignancy, are also linked with IPF. miR-29a and miR-185 downregulation is probably involved both in carcinogenesis and fibrogenesis. We have previously observed miR-29a and miR-185 downregulation in IPF cells from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and in this study we investigated their expression in LC BAL cells. Common targets of miR-29a and miR-185 such as DNA methyltransferase (DNMT)1, DNMT3b, COL1A1, AKT1 and AKT2 were measured. Potential correlations with pulmonary function tests, smoking status and endobronchial findings were investigated. Similar levels of miR-29a and miR-185 were detected in IPF and LC while their common targets AKT1 and DNMT3b were not found to differ, suggesting potential pathogenetic similarities at the level of key epigenetic regulators. By conrast, COL1A1 mRNA levels were increased in IPF suggesting a disease-specific mRNA signature. Notably, DNMT1 was downregulated in the LC group and its expression was further reduced in the presence of increasing malignant burden as it was implied by the endobronchial findings.

Circulating DNA in EGFR-mutated lung cancer

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) consists of short double stranded DNA fragments that are released by tumors including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). With the identification of driver mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene and development of targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the clinical outcome of NSCLC patients in this subgroup has improved tremendously. The gold standard to assess EGFR mutation is through tissue biopsy, which can be limited by difficulty in accessing the tumor, inability of patients to tolerate invasive procedures, insufficient sample for molecular testing and inability to capture intratumoral heterogeneity. The great need for rapid and accurate identification of activating EGFR mutations in NSCLC patients paves the road for ctDNA technology. Studies have demonstrated ctDNA to be a reliable complement to tumor genotyping. Platforms like digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and next-generation sequencing based analyses have made it possible to identify EGFR mutations in plasma with high sensitivity and specificity. This article will provide an overview on ctDNA in the context of EGFR mutated NSCLC, especially its emerging applications in diagnosis, disease surveillance, treatment monitoring and detection of resistance mechanisms.