Dubiously increased FT4 and FT3 levels in clinically euthyroid patients: clinical finding or analytical pitfall?

Free thyroxine measurement in clinical practice: how to optimize indications, analytical procedures, and interpretation criteria while waiting for global standardization

Thyroid dysfunctions are among the most common endocrine disorders and accurate biochemical testing is needed to confirm or rule out a diagnosis. Notably, true hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism in the setting of a normal thyroid-stimulating hormone level are highly unlikely, making the assessment of free thyroxine (FT4) inappropriate in most new cases. However, FT4 measurement is integral in both the diagnosis and management of relevant central dysfunctions (central hypothyroidism and central hyperthyroidism) as well as for monitoring therapy in hyperthyroid patients treated with anti-thyroid drugs or radioiodine. In such settings, accurate FT4 quantification is required. Global standardization will improve the comparability of the results across laboratories and allow the development of common clinical decision limits in evidence-based guidelines. The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Committee for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests has undertaken FT4 immunoassay method comparison and recalibration studies and developed a reference measurement procedure that is currently being validated. However, technical and implementation challenges, including the establishment of different clinical decision limits for distinct patient groups, still remain. Accordingly, different assays and reference values cannot be interchanged. Two-way communication between the laboratory and clinical specialists is pivotal to properly select a reliable FT4 assay, establish reference intervals, investigate discordant results, and monitor the analytical and clinical performance of the method over time.

Comparison of Various Ultrasound-Based Malignant Risk Stratification Systems on an Occasion for Assessing Thyroid Nodules in Hashimoto's Thyroiditis

Purpose

To compare the diagnostic performance and unnecessary ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (US-FNA) biopsy rate of the 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA), 2016 Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR), and 2017 American College of Radiology (ACR) guidelines for patients with and without Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT).

Patients and Methods

This retrospective study included 716 nodules from 696 consecutive patients, which were classified using the categories defined by the three guidelines: ATA, KSThR, and ACR. The malignancy risk in each category was calculated and the diagnostic performance and unnecessary fine-needle aspiration (FNA) rates of the three guidelines were compared.

Results

In total, 426 malignant and 290 benign nodules were identified. Patients with malignant nodules had lower total thyroxine levels and higher thyroid-stimulating hormone, thyroid peroxidase antibody, and thyroglobulin antibody levels than those without malignant nodules (all P<0.01). The margin difference was significant in non-HT patients (P<0.01), but comparable in HT patients (P=0.55). The calculated malignancy risks of high and intermediate suspicion nodules in the ATA and KSThR guidelines and moderately suspicious nodules in the ACR guidelines were significantly lower in non-HT patients compared with HT patients (P<0.05). The ACR guidelines showed the lowest sensitivity, highest specificity, and lowest unnecessary FNA rates in patients with and without HT. Compared to non-HT patients, HT patients had significantly lower unnecessary FNA rates (P<0.01).

Conclusion

HT was associated with a higher malignancy rate of thyroid nodules with intermediate suspicion according to the ATA, KSThR, and ACR guidelines. The three guidelines, especially ACR, were likely to be more effective and could allow a greater reduction in the percentage of benign nodules biopsied in patients with HT.