Continued harmonization of the international normalized ratio across a large laboratory network: Evidence of sustained low interlaboratory variation and bias after a change in instrumentation

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to maintain low interlaboratory variation and bias in international normalized ratio (INR) results following a network change in instrumentation and reagents, using a process of ongoing standardization and harmonization.

METHODS

Network-wide standardization to new common instrument and reagent platforms followed by network-wide application of a simple novel process of verification of international sensitive index and mean normal prothrombin time values for each new lot of prothrombin time (PT) reagent that does not require use of World Health Organization reference thromboplastin or INR calibration/certified plasma.

RESULTS

The network transitioned from mechanical hemostasis detection instruments with associated PT reagent (Diagnostica Stago; NeoPTimal) to optical detection (ACL TOPs) with associated PT reagent (Werfen; RecombiPlasTin 2G). Comparing 3 years of data for each situation, the network (n = 27 laboratories) maintained low INR variability and bias relative to general mechanical and optical groups and other laboratories.

CONCLUSIONS

Harmonized support for patient management of vitamin K antagonists such as warfarin was continuously maintained in our geography, with potentially positive implications for other coagulation laboratories and geographies. For the United States in particular, paucity of US Food and Drug Administration-cleared INR certified plasmas potentially compromises INR test accuracy; our novel approach may provide workable alternatives for other laboratories/networks.

Evolution of Hemostasis Testing: A Personal Reflection Covering over 40 Years of History

There is no certainty in change, other than change is certain. As Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis celebrates 50 years of publication, I felt it appropriate to reflect on my own 40-year plus scientific career. My career in the thrombosis and hemostasis field did not start until 1987, but the subsequent 35 years reflected a period of significant change in associated disease diagnostics. I started in the Westmead Hospital "coagulation laboratory" when staff were still performing manual clotting tests, using stopwatches, pipettes, test tubes, and a water bath, which we transported to the hospital outpatient department to run our weekly warfarin clinic. Several hemostasis instruments have come and gone, including the Coag-A-Mate X2, the ACL-300R, the MDA-180, the BCS XP, and several StaR Evolution analyzers. Some instruments remain, including the PFA-100, PFA-200, the AggRAM, the CS-5100, an AcuStar, a Hydrasys gel system, and two ACL-TOP 750s. We still have a water bath, but this is primarily used to defrost frozen samples, and manual clotting tests are only used to teach visiting medical students. We have migrated across several methodologies in the 45-year history of the local laboratory. Laurel gel rockets, used for several assays in the 1980s, were replaced with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay assays and most assays were eventually placed on automated instruments. Radio-isotopic assays, used in the 1980s, were replaced by an alternate safer method or else abandoned. Test numbers have increased markedly over time. The approximately 31,000 hemostasis assays performed at the Westmead-based laboratory in 1983 had become approximately 200,000 in 2022, a sixfold increase. Some 90,000 prothrombin times and activated partial thromboplastic times are now performed at this laboratory per year. Thrombophilia assays were added to the test repertoires over time, as were the tests to measure several anticoagulant drugs, most recently the direct oral anticoagulants. I hope my personal history, reflecting on the changes in hemostasis testing over my career to date in the field, is found to be of interest to the readership, and I hope they forgive any inaccuracies I have introduced in this reflection of the past.

Serum Biomarkers of Maternal Morbidity and Adverse Outcome in Severe Pre-Eclampsia

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of maternal serum biomarkers of myocardial damage, oxidative stress and angiogenic imbalance with maternal adverse outcomes in women with severe pre-eclampsia.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study, where maternal serum biomarkers were evaluated in women admitted with severe pre-eclampsia to a tertiary care centre between March 2019 and February 2020. Serum markers included brain naturetic peptide (BNP), cardiac troponin-T (cTnT), cystatin-C (cys-C), soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1), placental growth factor (PlGF), Total Anti-Oxidant status (TAO) and malondialdehyde (MAO). Main outcome measures were adverse maternal outcomes defined as eclampsia, pulmonary oedema, acute kidney injury, placental abruption and HELLP syndrome.

RESULTS

Adverse maternal outcomes occurred in 93(37.2%, 95% CI: 31.2%-43.6%) of the 250 women with severe pre-eclampsia included in the study, including 21 with pulmonary oedema, 25 with acute kidney injury and 36 with eclampsia. BNP levels were higher among women who developed pulmonary oedema (55.4 pg/mL vs 42.0 pg/mL, p = 0.008). TAO levels were higher in women who developed eclampsia (4.6 mM, IQR 3.1-5.7, p < 0.001) and acute kidney injury (4.1 mM, IQR 3.2-6.3, p = 0.002) compared to those who did not develop any complications (2.93 mM, IQR 2.3-4.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Even though the endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress biomarkers were associated with development of preeclampsia, it may have limited utility in identifying women who might develop adverse outcomes.

Effect of warfarin versus aspirin on blood viscosity in cardioembolic stroke with atrial fibrillation: a prospective clinical trial

Background

Warfarin is evidence-based therapy for the prevention of cardioembolic stroke, but has not been studied for its effects on whole blood viscosity (WBV). This study investigated the effect of warfarin versus aspirin on WBV in patients presenting with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and acute cardioembolic stroke.

Methods

We enrolled patients with acute cerebral infarction, aged 56–90 years who had NVAF, CHADS₂ score ≥ 2, presenting with mild-to-moderate stroke (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score < 20 and modified Rankin Scale (2mRS) score < 4) in a single center. The patients were alternately assigned to warfarin or aspirin groups. Post-treatment WBV was assessed after international normalized ratio (INR) reached target range [2, 3] for patients in the warfarin group, and 5 days after baseline in the aspirin group.

Results

Total 67 patients were included, and 56 completed this study (33 warfarin and 23 aspirin). Compared to baseline values, warfarin reduced post-treatment BV at all shear rates. The BV reductions greater than 1 cP measured at shear rates of 300, 150, 5, and 1 s^− 1 were independently and significantly associated with warfarin treatment compared to aspirin after adjusting for age, sex, CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores, and baseline hematocrit.

Conclusions

Warfarin confers greater reductions in BV than aspirin in patients with acute cardioembolic stroke. BV could be a useful method to estimate thrombotic risk in patients receiving warfarin.

Trial registration

KCT0001291, Date of Registration: 2014-12-01

Harmonizing the International Normalized Ratio (INR) : Standardization of Methods and Use of Novel Strategies to Reduce Interlaboratory Variation and Bias

OBJECTIVES

To reduce interlaboratory variation and bias in international normalized ratio (INR) results, as used to monitor patients receiving vitamin K antagonist therapy, including warfarin, in a large pathology network (n = 27 laboratories) by procedural standardization and harmonization.

METHODS

Network consensus to standardize to common instrument and reagent platforms was established, following development of hemostasis test specifications. Subsequent installations and implementation occurred after conclusion of a government tender process. Network-wide application of simple novel process of verification harmonization of local international sensitive index and mean normal prothrombin time initiated for each new lot of INR reagent that does not require ongoing use of reference thromboplastin or calibration/certified plasma sets.

RESULTS

We achieved reduction of different instrument manufacturers (from four to one), instrument types (10 to three), reagent types (four to one), and instrument/reagent combinations (12 to three), plus substantial reduction in INR variability and bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Results infer significant improvement in local patient management, with positive implications for other laboratories. For the United States in particular, lack of US Food and Drug Administration-cleared certified plasmas may compromise INR accuracy, and our novel approach may provide a workable alternative for laboratories and networks.

Validation of the Sysmex CS5100 coagulation analyzer and comparison to the Stago STA-R analyzer for routine coagulation parameters

INTRODUCTION

The CS5100 analyzer (Sysmex) was validated for the determination of routine coagulation parameters. This fully automated coagulation analyzer uses multiple wavelength technology to perform coagulation (e.g., activated partial thromboplastin time - APTT, prothrombin time - PT, fibrinogen - FBG), chromogenic (e.g., antithrombin - AT) and immunological (e.g., D-dimers - DDi) assays.

METHODS

A comparison with the currently used STA-R Evolution (Stago) was performed. Validation and verification of reference values of the CS5100 was performed in accordance to CLSI guidelines (H57-A, H47-A2, and C28-A3).

RESULTS

As a different detection system and reagents were used, significant differences were observed (e.g. APTT). The within-day and between-day imprecision, accuracy and total error were all acceptable. The reference values defined by the manufacturer could be used except for APTT. In our settings, the therapeutic anti-Xa range of 0.3-0.7 IU/mL corresponded to an APTT range of 60-100 s (Dade actin FS reagent). The APTT reagent showed factor sensitivities between 46 and 72% for FVIII, IX, XI and XII while the PT reagent showed sensitivities between 34 and 52% for FII, FV, FXII, and FX.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the CS5100 instrument is suitable for the determination of the APTT, PT, FBG, DDi and AT in routine analysis.

Diagnostic 20-min whole blood clotting test in Russell's viper envenoming delays antivenom administration

BACKGROUND

The 20-min whole blood clotting test (WBCT20) is widely used for the identification of coagulopathy in snake envenoming, but its performance in practice has not been evaluated.

AIM

We aimed to investigate the diagnostic utility of the WBCT20 for coagulopathy in Russell's viper envenoming.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

METHODS

Adult patients with snake envenoming were recruited. Age, sex, bite information, clinical effects, serial WBCT20 and antivenom treatment were recorded. Definite Russell's viper envenoming was confirmed with venom specific enzyme immunoassay. We assessed sensitivity of admission WBCT20 to coagulopathy (international normalized ratio, INR > 1.5) in Russell's viper envenoming, the specificity of negative WBCT20 in non-envenomed patients and directly compared paired WBCT20 and INR.

RESULTS

Admission WBCT20 was done in 140 Russell's viper bites with coagulopathy and was positive in 56/140 [sensitivity 40% (95% confidence interval (CI): 32-49%)]. A negative WBCT20 led to delayed antivenom administration [WBCT20-ve tests: median delay, 1.78 h (interquartile range (IQR): 0.83-3.7 h) vs. WBCT20 + ve tests: median delay, 0.82 h (IQR: 0.58-1.48 h); P = 0.0007]. Delays to antivenom were largely a consequence of further WBCT20 being performed and more common if the first test was negative (41/84 vs. 12/56). Initial WBCT20 was negative in 9 non-envenomed patients and 48 non-venomous snakebites [specificity: 100% (95% CI: 94-100%)]. In 221 paired tests with INR > 1.5, the WBCT20 was positive in 91(41%). The proportion of positive WBCT20 only increased slightly with higher INR.

CONCLUSION

In clinical practice, the WBCT20 has low sensitivity for detecting coagulopathy in snake envenoming and should not over-ride clinical assessment-based decisions about antivenom administration. There is an urgent need to develop a simple bedside test for coagulopathy in snake envenoming.

Laboratory hematology in the history of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

Background: For the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the journal Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), an historic overview of papers that the journal has published in the field of laboratory hematology (LH) is presented.

Methods: All past volumes of CCLM were screened for papers on LH and these were categorized. Bibliographic data of these papers were also analyzed.

Results: CCLM published in total 387 LH papers. The absolute number of LH papers published annually showed a significant increase over the years since 1985. Also the share of LH papers demonstrated a steady increase (overall mean 5%, but mean 8% over the past 4 years). The most frequent category was coagulation and fibrinolysis (23.5%). Authors from Germany contributed the most LH papers to the journal (22.7%), followed by the Netherlands and Italy (16.3 and 13.2%, respectively). Recent citation data indicated that other publications cited LH review papers much more frequently than other types of papers.

Conclusions: The history of the journal reflects the emergence and development of laboratory hematology as a separate discipline of laboratory medicine.

The new oral anticoagulants and the future of haemostasis laboratory testing

The tests currently employed within most haemostasis laboratories to monitor anticoagulant therapy largely comprise the prothrombin time (PT)/ International Normalised Ratio (INR) and the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). These are respectively used to monitor Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) such as warfarin, and unfractionated heparin. Additional tests that laboratories may also employ for assessing or monitoring unfractionated heparin include thrombin time (TT) and the anti-Xa assay, which can also be used to monitor low molecular weight heparin. Several new anti-thrombotic agents have recently emerged, or are in the final process of clinical evaluation. These novel drugs that include Dabigatran etexilate and Rivaroxaban would not theoretically require monitoring; however, testing is useful in specific situations. The tests currently used to monitor VKAs and heparin are typically either too sensitive or too insensitive to the new drugs to be used as 'typically performed in laboratories', and may thus require some methodological adjustments to increase or decrease their sensitivity. Alternately, different tests may be better employed in these assessments. Whatever the case, laboratories may soon be performing a reduced or possibly increased number of tests, the same kind of tests but perhaps differently, or conceivably different assay panels. Specific laboratory guidance on the choice of the appropriate test to be ordered according to the drug being administered, as well as on appropriate interpretation of test results, will also be necessary. The current report reviews the current state of play and provides a glimpse to the possible future of the coagulation laboratory.

Coagulation update: what's new in hemostasis testing?

The current report provides a personal perspective summarising some interesting recent developments in hemostasis, as well as providing a brief glimpse into some possible imminent changes to come. We briefly review routine coagulation tests, and what changes may take place related to the new emerging anticoagulants. We also briefly review the old and new global tests of hemostasis, including thrombin generation and thromboelastography. Also briefly discussed within the diagnostics of bleeding and thrombotic disorders are the role of microparticles, the rise and fall of thrombophilia testing, the 'disappearance' of fibrinolysis pathway tests, and the absence of tests related to the endothelium, in part reflecting upon Virchow's triad.

Regulation of in vitro diagnostics (IVDs) for use in clinical diagnostic laboratories: towards the light or dark in clinical laboratory testing?

A revised framework for the regulation of in vitro diagnostic devices (IVDs) came into force in Australia on July 1, 2010 that aims to ‘ensure that public and personal health are adequately protected’, but which instead may lead to adverse outcomes in clinical diagnosis and management. The regulatory process aims to regulate all IVDs, including those used by clinical diagnostic laboratories, which are already subject to scrutiny as part of the current laboratory accreditation process. The IVD regulatory process initiated in Australia is similar to that used in Canada, but different to that currently operating in the USA and Europe. However, it is feasible that other countries will in time adopt a similar regulatory framework, given that many countries are involved in the development process. In this opinion paper, the regulatory process for IVDs across several geographies are outlined, as are some benefits and weaknesses of the new regulatory process now applied to Australia, as potentially planned for other regions of the world.