1
|
Soriano MA, Jiménez-Ormeño E, Lake JP, McMahon JJ, Gallo-Salazar C, Mundy P, Comfort P. Kinetics and Kinematics of the Push Press, Push Jerk, and Split Jerk. J Strength Cond Res 2024; 38:1359-1365. [PMID: 39072653 DOI: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000004810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
Abstract
Soriano, MA, Jiménez-Ormeño, E, Lake, JP, McMahon, JJ, Gallo-Salazar, C, Mundy, P, and Comfort, P. Kinetics and kinematics of the push press, push jerk, and split jerk. J Strength Cond Res 38(8): 1359–1365, 2024—The aim of this study was to explore the kinetics and kinematics across incremental loads with the push press (PP), push jerk (PJ), and split jerk (SJ). Eighteen resistance-trained men performed the 1 repetition maximum (1RM) tests (visit 1) 3–7 days before an incremental loading protocol (60, 75, and 90% 1RM) of the 3 exercises (visit 2). Kinetics and kinematics were derived from force-time data and compared using a repeated-measures analysis of variance with load and exercise as within-subject factors. Dependent variables for the biomechanics assessment were categorized as output (power and impulse), driver (force and work), and strategy (displacement and duration) metrics. The interrepetition reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and coefficient of variation. The PP, PJ, and SJ 1RM performance were 89.7 ± 15.4, 95.6 ± 14.4, and 103.0 ± 16.9 kg, respectively. Driver, strategy, and outcome metrics displayed moderate-to-excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.58–0.98) reliability with acceptable variability (% coefficient of variation: 2.02–10.00). Increased load resulted in significantly large increases in force, work, displacement, duration, power, and impulse (p < 0.001,
= 0.534–0.903). Exercise selection had a significant and large effect on power, impulse, work, and force (p < 0.016,
= 0.387–0.534). There was a significant and large effect of load × exercise interaction on work, displacement, and duration (p < 0.019,
= 0.158–0.220). Practitioners are encouraged to use heavier loads (90 > 75 > 60% 1RM) during the SJ exercise to maximize output, driver, and strategy kinetics and kinematics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcos A Soriano
- Strength Training and Neuromuscular Performance (STreNgthP) Research Group, Camilo José Cela University, Madrid, Spain
- Directorate of Sport, Exercise and Physiotherapy, University of Salford, Frederick Road Campus, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Centre for Sport Studies, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ester Jiménez-Ormeño
- Strength Training and Neuromuscular Performance (STreNgthP) Research Group, Camilo José Cela University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jason P Lake
- Department of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Chichester, Chichester, United Kingdom
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia
| | - John J McMahon
- Directorate of Sport, Exercise and Physiotherapy, University of Salford, Frederick Road Campus, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - César Gallo-Salazar
- Strength Training and Neuromuscular Performance (STreNgthP) Research Group, Camilo José Cela University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Peter Mundy
- Hawkin Dynamics, Inc., Westbrook, Maine; and
- Department of Applied Sciences and Health, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Comfort
- Directorate of Sport, Exercise and Physiotherapy, University of Salford, Frederick Road Campus, Manchester, United Kingdom
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Soriano MA, García-Ramos A, Calderbank J, Marín PJ, Sainz de Baranda P, Comfort P. Does Sex Impact the Differences and Relationships in the One Repetition Maximum Performance Across Weightlifting Overhead Pressing Exercises? J Strength Cond Res 2020; 36:1930-1935. [PMID: 32732776 DOI: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000003746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Soriano, MA, García-Ramos, A, Calderbank, J, Marín, PJ, Sainz de Baranda, P, and Comfort, P. Does sex impact the differences and relationships in the one repetition maximum performance across weightlifting overhead pressing exercises? J Strength Cond XX(X): 000-000, 2020-This study aimed to determine the impact of sex on the differences and relationships of the one repetition maximum (1RM) performance between 3 overhead pressing exercises (push press [PP], push jerk [PJ] and split jerk [SJ]). 15 men (body mass [BM]: 82.3 ± 9.9 kg; weightlifting training experience: 2.6 ± 1.6 years) and 15 women (BM: 64.4 ± 7.0 kg; weightlifting training experience: 2.2 ± 1.4 years) participated in this study. A ratio-scaled (1RM·BM) was used for the comparison between them. The 1RM of the 3 exercises were evaluated within the same testing session using a combined 1RM assessment method. The interaction effect of exercise and sex did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.671; η = 0.001). In contrast, there were significant main effects of exercise (p ≤ 0.01) and sex (p < 0.001) with medium (η = 0.096) and large effect sizes (η = 0.306), respectively. A similar main effect of exercise was reported for both men (PP [1.0 ± 0.1 kg·kg] < PJ [1.1 ± 0.2 kg·kg] ∼ SJ [1.2 ± 0.2 kg·kg]) and women (PP [0.8 ± 0.1 kg·kg] < PJ [0.9 ± 0.2 kg·kg] ∼ SJ [0.9 ± 0.2 kg·kg]). The 1RM performance of the 3 exercises was significantly correlated for men (r [range] = 0.856-0.963) and women (r [range] = 0.636-0.925). Sex does not affect the differences in the 1RM performance across weightlifting overhead pressing exercises. However, stronger correlations and lower variation in the 1RM performance during the PP, PJ, and SJ are expected for men compared with women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcos A Soriano
- Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Camilo José Cela University, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Physical Activity and Sports Sciences, University of Murcia, San Javier, Murcia, Spain.,Directorate of Sport, Exercise and Physiotherapy, University of Salford, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Amador García-Ramos
- Department of Sports Sciences and Physical Conditioning, Faculty of Education, CIEDE, Catholic University of the Most Holy Concepción, Concepción, Chile
| | - Jessica Calderbank
- Directorate of Sport, Exercise and Physiotherapy, University of Salford, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Pilar Sainz de Baranda
- Department of Physical Activity and Sports Sciences, University of Murcia, San Javier, Murcia, Spain
| | - Paul Comfort
- Directorate of Sport, Exercise and Physiotherapy, University of Salford, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|